DOCSLIB.ORG

South Sudan Humanitarian Fund 2016 People Reached1 Allocations # of Projects2 # of Partners

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
South Sudan Humanitarian Fund 2016 People Reached1 Allocations # of Projects2 # of Partners FAST COORDINATED EFFECTIVE SOUTH SUDAN 2016 HUMANITARIAN FUND ANNUAL REPORT SOUTH SUDAN HUMANITARIAN FUND 2016 PEOPLE REACHED1 ALLOCATIONS # OF PROJECTS2 # OF PARTNERS 1.8M $81.3M 211 67 SUDAN Abyei Upper Nile region Unity Northern Bahr el Ghazal Jonglei Warrap ETHIOPIA Western Bahr el Ghazal CENTRAL Lakes AFRICAN REPUBLIC Severity of needs Central per county Equatoria Western Equatoria Eastern Equatoria + SSHF allocations per county (US$) > 10.0m DEMOCRATIC KENYA 2.6 - 10.0m 1.1 - 2.5m REPUBLIC OF 0.26 - 1.0m - 0.005 - 0.25m THE CONGO UGANDA *The smaller allocations depicted above represent common services activities carried out in multiple locations. Source: OCHA and partners, 2016 The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Final boundary between the Republic of South Sudan and the Republic of Sudan has not yet been determined. Final status of Abyei region is not yet determined This document is produced by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA). The designations employed and the presentation of material in the report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Cover photo: UNICEF/Kate Holt. PART I: TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I: OVERVIEW Foreword by the Humanitarian Coordinator ������������������ 02 SSHF at a glance ����������������������������������������������������������������� 03 Humanitarian context 2016 ����������������������������������������������� 04 Donor contributions ����������������������������������������������������������� 05 Overview of allocations ����������������������������������������������������� 06 Fund performance �������������������������������������������������������������� 09 Promoting quality programming ���������������������������������������� 13 Challenges and lessons learned ��������������������������������������� 14 PART II: SUMMARY OF ACHIEVEMENTS Camp Coordination and Camp Management ���������������� 16 Education ����������������������������������������������������������������������������� 17 Emergency Shelter and Non-Food Items ������������������������ 18 Food Security and Livelihoods ����������������������������������������� 19 Health ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 20 Nutrition ������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 21 Protection ����������������������������������������������������������������������������� 22 Water, Sanitation and Hygiene ����������������������������������������� 23 Success stories �������������������������������������������������������������������� 24 Emergency Telecommunications ������������������������������������� 25 Logistics ������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 26 PART III: ANNEXES Advisory board ��������������������������������������������������������������������� 28 Funding by organization ������������������������������������������������������ 29 Acronyms ����������������������������������������������������������������������������� 30 End notes ����������������������������������������������������������������������������� 32 SSHF contacts and useful links ���������������� inside back cover 01 PART I: FOREWORD BY THE HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR FOREWORD BY THE HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR At the outset of 2016, many of us hoped that the year would allocations, which enabled us to allocate funds well beyond bring positive change for civilians across South Sudan who the contributions we received. had borne the brunt of more than two years of horrific civil Our two standard allocations provided a vital injection of war. Instead, the conflict deepened and spread, reaching funding to the most urgent activities under the 2016 HRP, areas previously considered stable and uprooting hundreds of although our timeliness was hampered by delays in contribu- thousands of people from their homes. Food insecurity and tions. Given the decrease in contributions, I was circumspect malnutrition rose to unprecedented levels, and civilians con- in my use of the reserve. However, we were able to support tinued to endure horrendous violations, with rape an abhor- the rapid scale-up of the response in Wau in June and, when rent and repeated feature of the conflict. additional funds became available late in the year, we moved With needs across the country rapidly rising, humanitarian quickly to fund the procurement of life-saving supplies for the partners worked day and night to reach people with life-sav- Greater Equatoria response. ing assistance and protection, including in some of the most Inspired by the Grand Bargain adopted at the World remote locations. Rather than folding under the pressure of Humanitarian Summit, we worked intensively in 2016 to multiple simultaneous crises, we came together—coordinating support frontline responders and promote efficiency in the rather than competing, and striving to reach as many people humanitarian operation. Some 12 per cent of SSHF funding in in need as possible, as quickly as possible. 2016 (up from 11 per cent in 2015 and 8 per cent in 2014) was Within this context, the South Sudan Humanitarian Fund allocated to 24 national NGOs (up from 22 in 2015 and 16 in (SSHF) was an important catalyst for fast, coordinated and 2014), and an estimated 85 per cent of all resources allocated effective humanitarian action. Under the SSHF Advisory by the SSHF benefitted the NGO community, either through Board’s stewardship, we allocated US$81.3 million to 211 pro- direct funding for frontline activities or supplies and common jects implemented by 67 partners across the country through- services provided in-kind by UN agencies. We drastically out the year, making the SSHF the fourth largest donor to the reduced ‘pass-through’ funding, with a view to eliminating it 2016 Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP). entirely by 2017. Faced with a sharp decline in donor contributions, we As we look toward 2017, I would like to thank all the partners responded by bolstering our collective prioritization, ensur- who have contributed to the continued success of the SSHF, ing that funds were directed to the most time-critical and and particularly our generous donors without whom the life-saving projects. Recognizing that our partners were faced SSHF would not exist. However, I would be remiss if I did not with onerous operational demands as the crisis grew, we light- close by appealing for our supporters to increase their contri- ened and streamlined SSHF processes, making the Fund more butions in 2017. Needs are continuing to rise and the SSHF is nimble, user-friendly and efficient. We also benefitted from well-placed to ensure that the humanitarian response is swift, an unanticipated return of funds unspent from previous SSHF effective and coordinated. Eugene Owusu Humanitarian Coordinator for South Sudan 02 PART I: THE SOUTH SUDAN HUMANITARIAN FUND 2016 AT A GLANCE THE SOUTH SUDAN HUMANITARIAN FUND 2016 AT A GLANCE PEOPLE REACHED NUMBER OF PROJECTS ALLOCATIONS BY LOCATION 1.8M 211 SUDAN ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Upper Nile ! ! Abyei ! ! ! ! region! $16.9m ALLOCATIONS (US$) NUMBER OF PARTNERS ! ! ! ! ! Northern Bahr ! el Ghazal Unity UnityUnity $16.8m $16.8m $4.5m Warrap ETHIOPIA M Western Bahr $2.2m Jonglei 81.3 67 el Ghazal $12.9m $4.2m Lakes CENTRAL AFRICAN $3.6m CONTRIBUTIONS (US$)* SSHF AS A % OF HRP FUNDING REPUBLIC $6.0m Central Equatoria Eastern Amount by county Western Equatoria Equatoria 5,001 - 50,000 $7.9m HRP 50,001 - 500,000 $6.4m M 500,001 - 1,000,000 58.2 7.5% KENYA DEMOCRATIC 1,000,001 - 5,000,000 REPUBLIC OF More than 5,000,000 THE CONGO UGANDA PEOPLE ASSISTED BY SEX & AGE ALLOCATIONS BY RESPONSE TYPE ALLOCATIONS BY AGENCY TYPE ALLOCATION ROUNDS 12% 12% 16% 20% 32% 1.8 million Total Total Total people $81.3 $81.3 $81.3 58% 36% 48% reached million 37% million 51% million 30% 23% 25% $47.1m Frontline services UN: $41.3 million $38.7 million Boys Women (58 allocations) 1st standard allocation round $24.5M Core pipelines Men Girls INGOs: $30.0 million $29.2 million $9.7m Logistics and (94 allocations) 2nd standard allocation round common services NNGOs: $10 million $13.4 million (59 allocations) Reserve allocations (x2) CONTRIBUTIONS TO SSHF (US$)* CLUSTER ALLOCATIONS (US$) 19.5m 19.5m19.5m8.1m UK 19.5m 21% Nutrition 14.1m 17% 8.1m8.1m Norway 8.1m7.3m 9% 7.3m7.3m WASH 13.4m 16% Sweden 7.3m 8% 6.8m6.8m Netherlands 6.8m3.3m 7% Health 11.9m 15% 3.3m3.3m Ireland 3.3m 4% 2.9m2.9m 2.9m Deposits 10.1m 12% Denmark2.3m2.9m 3% ES/NFI Belgium2.2m2.3m2.3m 2% Carry-over & interest 2.2m Logistics 9.1m 11% Germany 2.2m 2% 2.2m Refunds Australia 2.2m 2% (Unutilized funds returned from FSL 8.8m 10% Switzerland 1.0m 1% previous allocations to partners) Republic of Korea 1.0m 1% Protection 6.8m 8% Canada 0.8m 1% Education 4.3m 5% Luxembourg 0.7m 1% 6.8m Carry over + Interest 22.2m 24% CCCM 2.2m 3% Refunds 13.3m 14% ETC 0.7m 1% *In addition to donor contributions of $58m, there was $22.2m available from carry over, and $13.3m available from refunds, in the SSHF during 2016. Refunds include $11.5 million of unutilized amounts or ineligible expenditures from NGO projects implemented between 2012 and 2015. 03 PART I: HUMANITARIAN CONTEXT 2016 HUMANITARIAN CONTEXT 2016 In 2016, the humanitarian crisis deepened
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Section 3 Includes Practical Exercises and Review
    Guide for Practical 3 Application Speak Up, Speak Out: A Toolkit for Reporting on Human Rights Issues Section 1 IntroductIon Section 1 IntroductIon NOtes ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • The KPMG IDAS Africa Story
    The KPMG IDAS Africa Story Impact Report 2015-2016 kpmg.com/das Acronyms aBi : Agricultural Business Initiative Trust AcT : Accountability in Tanzania AECF : The Africa Enterprise Challenge Fund AGRA : Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa BOP : Bottom of the Pyramid BRACED : Building Resilience and Adaptation to Climate Extremes and Disaster CGAP : Consultative Group to Assist the Poor CICF : County Innovation Challenge Fund Danida : Danish International Development Agency FRP : The MasterCard Foundation Fund for Rural Prosperity FSDT Kenya: Financial Sector Deepening Trust, Kenya FSP : Financial Service Provider GEM : The World Bank Growth and Employment Project GRP : The Global Resilience Partnership HDIF : Human Development Innovation Fund IDAS : International Development Advisory Services IFC : International Finance Corporation IFAD : International Fund for Agricultural Development MEC : MicroEnergy Credits MOOC : Massive Open Online Course REACT : Renewable Energy and Adaptation to Climate Change Technologies (window of the AECF) SCIP Fund: Strategic Climate Institutions Programme Fund SDC : Swiss Agency for Development Cooperation Sida : Swedish International Development Agency SPV : Special Purpose Vehicle THAT : Tandabui Health Access Tanzania Contents 13I 15I AGRIBUSINESS RENEWABLE ENERGY Who We Are 05 AND CLIMATE CHANGE The Grantees 06 Impact at Scale 08 KPMG Values 09 KPMG Lifelong Learning 10 KPMG IDAS Sectors 12 Agribusiness Sector 13 Renewable Energy and 15 Climate Change Resilience Sector 18 18I 22I Innovation, Technology
    [Show full text]
  • About Center for Civilians in Conflict Annual Report
    About Center for ANNUAL REPORT Civilians in Conflict 2012 Center for Civilians in Conflict works to make warring parties more responsible to civilians before, during, and after armed conflict. We are advocates who believe no civilian caught in conflict should be ignored, and advisors who provide practical solutions to preventing and responding to civilian harm. The organization was founded as Campaign for Innocent Victims in Conflict (CIVIC) in 2003 by Marla Ruzicka, a courageous humanitarian killed by a suicide bomber in 2005 while advocating for Iraqi families. CENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT T +1 202 558 6958 | F +1 623 321 7076 E [email protected] 1210 18th Street NW | 4th Floor Washington DC 20036 www.civiliansinconflict.org 1 2 Letter from the Chairman of the Board Letter from the Executive Director Dear friends, I want you to know how many people are working to lessen suffering in the world. In Syria, brave doctors are helping wounded civilians. In Pakistan, lawyers are getting compensation I joined this organization back in 2008 because I believed in the work. Here was a small group for conflict victims. In Somalia, journalists courageously tell the story of conflict. War is indeed of dedicated people changing the nature of war. They are an inspiration. brutal, but we see the better side of humanity every day. I also joined because I know potential for growth when I see it. In this global puzzle to create a better world, our piece is as critical as it is unique. Much of my career has been about growing organizations to tackle global health challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Peacekeeping: Challenges and Opportunities
    214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE • Washington DC 20002 • (202) 546-4400 • heritage.org CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY ________________________________________________________________________ United Nations Peacekeeping: Challenges and Opportunities Testimony before The Committee on Foreign Relations Subcommittee on International Operations and Organizations, Democracy and Human Rights United States Senate July 23, 2008 Brett D. Schaefer Jay Kingham Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom The Heritage Foundation Thank you for inviting me to speak about United Nations Peacekeeping: Challenges and Opportunities. My name is Brett Schaefer. I am the Jay Kingham Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs at The Heritage Foundation. The views I express in this testimony are my own and should not be construed as representing any official position of The Heritage Foundation. UN Peacekeeping One of the United Nations‘ primary responsibilities—and the one that Americans most agree with—is to help maintain international peace and security, but the UN has come under increasing criticism, both within the United States and around the world, for its inability to keep the peace where it is asked to do so. The UN Charter places principal responsibility for maintaining international peace and security within the UN system on the Security Council.1 The Charter gives the Security Council extensive powers to investigate disputes to determine whether they endanger international peace and security; to call on participants in a dispute to settle the conflict through peaceful negotiation; to impose mandatory economic, travel, and diplomatic sanctions; and ultimately to authorize the use of military force.2 This robust vision of the UN as a key vehicle for maintaining international peace and security quickly ran athwart the interests of the member states, particularly during the Cold War when opposing alliances prevented the UN from taking decisive action except when the interests of the major powers were minimal.
    [Show full text]
  • © Kate Holt/IRIN
    1 © Kate Holt/IRIN WHY WASHINGTON STATE? Washington state continues to be a leading exporter, shipping $81.9 billion in goods and $24 billion in services in 2013,1 but there is more to the story than just airplanes and software. Our state’s most important export is a better quality of life for people all over the world. Washington state NGOs and companies are working in over 200 countries in areas such as food security, human rights, good governance, economic development, education, environment and health. With such a strong global development community, Washington state could easily be called the Silicon Valley of Hope. WHY GLOBAL WASHINGTON? Global Washington is the only organization in Washington state that unites businesses, nonprofits, foundations and universities that are working in global development, leading to partnerships that result in innovative products and solutions in the field. We promote our members, bring them together to spark new ideas, and build a network of leaders improving lives around the world. Global Washington believes that by collaborating and working together in our efforts, we accelerate a shared mission of making the world a better place. 1 Washington Council on International Trade 2 PHOTO: SPREEHA GLOBAL CHALLENGES EDUCATION ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY Worldwide, 114 million More than 3.7 billion children don’t receive people struggle to live a basic primary on $2 per day, and half education.1 And even of those are actually for those who are enrolled in surviving on $1 per day or less.5 In school, the quality of education is 12 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, often extremely low.
    [Show full text]
  • Vision and Legacy – 50 Years Later
    volume 6 1 2/2011New Routes 2/2011 1 A journal of peace research New Routes and action published by the life & peace institute Dag Hammarskjöld and the United Nations: Vision and legacy – 50 years later Special issue in collaboration between the Life & Peace Institute and the Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation Contents A sunny September day i was eleven, standing in our garden, moved to tears when my mother told 3 editorial: me what had happened. In my childish world Dag Hammarskjöld had been Dag Hammarskjöld re-visited a garantor against “the worst”, in spite of the Cold War round the corner. Henning Melber How could he suddenly go? Fifty years later I have the privilege of introducing Henning Melber as guest General rather than Secretary editor of this special issue of New Routes. Thanks to his commitment, know­ 7 Lena Lid Falkman ledge and network we present the vision and legacy of Dag Hammarskjöld in honourable memory. inspired by dag hammarskjöld kristina lundqvist 11 Birgitta Nordenman [email protected] [email protected] The ethics of an international 12 civil servant Hans Corell about the authors Leave it to Dag! 17 henning melber is Executive Director 06 President of the UN General Peter Wallensteen of the Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation Assembly. He also served as a Special and a Research Associate with the Envoy to Darfur (2006­08). Global leadership of Secretaries University of Pretoria. 21 kiyo akasaka is the Under­Secretary­ and Generals lena lid falkman (Andersson), PhD, is General for Communications and Public Thomas G. Weiss a scholar at Stockholm School of Information at the UN.
    [Show full text]
  • THE EFFECT of GENDER EQUALITY PROGRAMMING on HUMANITARIAN OUTCOMES © 2015 UN Women
    THE EFFECT OF GENDER EQUALITY PROGRAMMING ON HUMANITARIAN OUTCOMES © 2015 UN Women. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-63214-014-2 The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of UN Women, the United Nations or any of its affiliated organizations. This publication may be freely used for non- commercial, fair use purposes, with proper acknowledgement of UN Women. Any other use must be authorized in writing by UN Women following a written request for permission. Any use of the content, in whole or in part, in all hard or soft-copy including in any online display, shall include attribution to UN- Women as the original publisher and display, or shall cause to be displayed, the copyright of UN Women as follows: “Copyright © [YEAR] by the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women. All worldwide rights reserved.” No user shall have the right to grant rights in the publication or contents that would purport to restrict the rights of UN Women. Produced by the Humanitarian Unit of UN Women on behalf of the IASC Reference Group on Gender in Humanitarian Action Research by Institute of Development Studies, at the University of Sussex Cover Photo: Kate Holt/Africa Practice Design: Melanie Doherty Design ACADEMIC PAPER THE EFFECT OF GENDER EQUALITY PROGRAMMING ON HUMANITARIAN OUTCOMES IDS_Master Logo HUMANITARIAN UNIT UN WOMEN New York, April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION i 1 SYNTHESIS REPORT 1 2 DADAAB, KENYA 19 3 NEPAL 51 4 MINDANAO, PHILIPPINES 75 5 TURKANA, KENYA 157 the effect of gender equality programming on humanitarian outcomes d FOREWORD Integrating gender equality and women’s empowerment has been in- equality and women’s tegrated into humanitarian programmes – by using empowerment into inputs from the beneficiaries themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing Crisis Enabling Recovery ANNUAL
    Preventing Crisis Enabling Recovery ANNUAL REPORT 2010 BUREAU FOR CRISIS PREVENTION AND RECOVERY 2010 Annual Report Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery United Nations Development Programme Marketing Graphic Design Design Illustrations Consultant Consultancy Rodrigo Domingues Cover photos left to right: IRIN–Kate Holt, Nepal; IRIN–Abdul Majeed Goraya, Pakistan; UNDP Burundi; IRIN Kate Holt, Chad; IRIN–Jason Gutierrez, Philippines; UNDP–Samuel Akera, Lesotho; UNDP–Jay Mandal, India; UNDP Sri Lanka; IRIN–Guy Oliver, Zambia; UN Photo - AFP, Kyrgyzstan; IRIN–Kate Holt, Afghanistan; UN Photo–Paulo Filgueiras; IRIN–Sayed Sarwar Amani, Afghanistan; UNDP Philippines; UNDP–Jay Mandal, India; IRIN–Siegfried Modola, Kenya; UNDP–Mariana Nissen, Haiti; UNDP–Marcos Rodriguez, Honduras; UNDP–Satomi Kato, Pakistan; IRIN–Gwen Dubourthoumieu, Democratic Republic of the Congo; IRIN–Mohamed Amin Jibril, Somalia; UNDP Tajikistan; UN Photo–Albert Gonzalez Farran, Sudan Table of Contents Foreword by Helen Clark 5 Introduction by Jordan Ryan 7 Achievements in Disaster Risk Reduction and Recovery 11 Achievements in Early Recovery 19 Achievements in Con!ict Prevention and Recovery 29 Achievements in Gender Equality in Crisis Prevention and Recovery 41 Global Partnerships 47 Conclusion 53 Financial Summary 59 Annex – Financial Report 63 Acronyms 75 Foreword by Helen Clark Empowered lives. Resilient nations. A more just and equitable world is one which will be more stable and secure. Recent events in the Arab states remind us that economic and political exclusion can be a combustible combination. The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) works with countries to reduce poverty, promote democratic governance, prevent and recover from crises, and protect the environment and combat climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Humanitarian Overview 2020 and Who Regularly Report to the Financial Tracking Service (FTS)
    UNITED NATIONS-COORDINATED SUPPORT TO PEOPLE AFFECTED BY DISASTER AND CONFLICT Acknowledgements This publication was produced by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) in collaboration with humanitarian partners across the world. OCHA thanks all organizations, partners and donors who contributed to the Global Humanitarian Overview 2020 and who regularly report to the Financial Tracking Service (FTS). Updated on 10 December 2019. Data sources Information on civilians in conflict is from the Report of the Secretary-General on Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict (S/2019/373). Figures on children in conflict are from the Report of the Secretary-General on Children and Armed Conflict 2018 (A/73/907–S/2019/509). Figures for undernourishment are from FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO, The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2019 (note the figures quoted in the GHO 2019 have since been revised). Figures on acute food insecurity are from the Food Security Information Network, 2019 Global Food Crises Report. Figures on refugees are from UNHCR, Global Trends: Forced Displacement 2018. Figures on internal displacement are from the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre: Global Report on Internal Displacement 2019. Data on children is from UNICEF: http://data.unicef.org. Data on infectious diseases are from WHO. Data on HIV/AIDS are from UNAIDS, UNAIDS Data 2019. The principal source of financial data for this publication is OCHA’s Financial Tracking Service (FTS) fts.unocha.org. Figures for 2019 represent reported contributions as of 13 November 2019. Other sources include: UNHCR data.unhcr.org, the Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) unocha.org/cerf and OCHA’s Country-Based Pooled Funds (CBPFs) Business Intelligence pfbi.unocha.org.
    [Show full text]
  • "Must Boys Be Boys? Ending Sexual Exploitation and Abuse in UN
    A POWERFUL VOICE FOR LIFESAVING ACTION must boys be boys? Ending SExual Exploitation & abuse in UN PeacEkeeping MissionS sarah martin Acknowledgments i am thankful for the women’s advocates in the countries of Sierra leone, liberia and Haiti for alerting me and educating me on the topic of sexual exploitation and abuse by peacekeepers. it is due to their ceaseless work that this issue has finally become acknowledged at the united nations. i would also like to acknowledge the hard work that the advocates for gender equity and women’s rights around the world do every day. i would also like to thank my Refugees interna- tional colleagues who accompanied me on my Ri assessments of West africa and Haiti including: Michelle brown, cliff bernath, Fidele lumeya, and peter gantz. in addition, i would like to thank nicole Mailman and Jehan khaleeli for their assistance in research. i would like to thank Joel charny for his patience and insistence that i could finish this report and make it a reality. Without his confidence, it would surely have lingered unfin- ished on my desk. Sarah Mendelson of cSiS and Sarah Margon of oxfam america gave me invalu- able comments that helped me finalize this report. Finally, i would like to thank alyson Martin, donald Martin, diana prieto, carol boender, and bernice Romero for their interest and support. NOTE ON tHe PHOTOGRAPHs the photographs in this report are meant solely to illustrate peacekeepers and their work. none of the people depicted are either perpetrators or victims of sexual exploitation and abuse. all photos were taken during Ri’s peacekeeping assessment missions.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Play a Role in Zimbabwe Derek Matyszak
    How to play a role in Zimbabwe Derek Matyszak MONOGRAPH 199 | DECEMBER 2019 Cover image: © Kate Holt/AusAID How to play a role in Zimbabwe Derek Matyszak Contents Executive summary .............................................................................................iv Abbreviations and acronyms ..............................................................................vi Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 Parallel narratives and a converged trajectory ................................................ 5 Chapter 2 Developing the narratives ................................................................................... 9 The illegitimacy component ............................................................................ 9 Illegitimacy and the instability narrative ........................................................ 11 Illegitimacy and the July 2018 elections ....................................................... 12 Challenging the results .................................................................................. 15 Sanctions and economic stress .................................................................... 19 Chapter 3 Strengthening the opposing narrative ............................................................. 29 Opposition to government and the suppression of dissent .......................... 29 Achieving the opposite of the intended effect through polemics ................. 38 Twisting facts at an
    [Show full text]
  • Field Manual – the Monitoring and Reporting Mechanism (MRM)
    Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict (OSRSG-CAAC), United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) FIELD MANUAL Monitoring and Reporting Mechanism (MRM) on Grave Violations Against Children in situations of Armed Conflict June 2014 © UNI84914/UNICEF/NYHQ 2010-0813/Kate Holt MRM Field Manual Field Manual – The Monitoring and Reporting Mechanism (MRM) on Grave Violations Against Children in situations of Armed Conflict © United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) June 2014 Acknowledgements The MRM Guidelines and Field Manual are dedicated to all those working to address grave violations against children through the MRM. The Guidelines and Field Manual were produced by the Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Children and Armed Conflict (OSRSG-CAAC), Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), in consultation with UN and NGO partners at headquarters and in the field. We particularly note the writing and editing contributions of Tonderai Chikuhwa, Suba Jayasekaran, Gerard McHugh, Stephane Pichette, Gary Risser, Lara Scott and Christine Watkins; and additional advisory support of Rosalie Azar, Marianne Bauer, Kumar Anuraj Jha, Ann Makome and Alec Wargo. Most importantly, we acknowledge the essential contributions from the current and former members of the MRM Country Task Forces in Afghanistan, Burundi, Central African Republic, Chad, Colombia, Cote d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Iraq, Myanmar, Nepal, Philippines, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Uganda, Yemen and the Israel/State of Palestine Children and Armed Conflict Working Group. We also greatly appreciate the valuable contributions of all of our UN and NGO partners, and UNICEF’s Regional Child Protection Advisers.
    [Show full text]