Second-Order Economics As an Example of Second-Order Cybernetics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Second-Order Economics As an Example of Second-Order Cybernetics Cybernetics and Human Knowing. Vol. 18, nos. 3-4, pp. xx-xx Second-Order Economics as an Example of Second-Order Cybernetics Stuart A. Umpleby1 Heinz von Foerster proposed that the observer should be included in the domain of observation. He suggested that this approach to cybernetics be called second-order cybernetics. Heinz was primarily interested in understanding cognition, based on neurophysiology and mathematics. But there has also been strong interest in cybernetics as a theory of social systems. Using the “second order” idea for existing social science fields would focus attention on the role of the observer and on reflexive phenomena such as the effect of theories on what is being studied. This article considers how the field of economics might adopt the second order idea. A Current Task for Cybernetics In emphasizing the role of the observer and creating the term second-order cybernetics Von Foerster was ahead of his time. One example is the fact that the field of economics may be on the verge of beginning research on second-order economics. But before explaining why that is happening, some background is necessary. Von Foerster was persuaded that the observer needed to be studied as well as the observed. The traditional philosophy of science maintained that scientific observations should be independent of the characteristics of the observer. However, as Humberto Maturana noted, “Anything said is said by an observer” (Maturana, 1970, p. 4). Hence, excluding the observer from consideration is a kind of denial. Von Foerster sustained and advanced the field of cybernetics when many others had returned to their home disciplines. Peter Asaro (2010) in an article titled “Whatever Happened to Cybernetics?” has suggested that there are three main interpretations of cybernetics. First, in the narrow view, cybernetics refers to feedback systems. This interpretation is common among those who work on artificial intelligence. Second, according to the internal view, cybernetics is associated with a subjectivist epistemology. Those committed to a realist epistemology view this line of research as a serious error. Third, according to a broad view, cybernetics can be thought of as a general theory of information and regulation similar to physics, a general theory of matter and energy. This paper takes the third view. Cybernetics can be thought of as a foundation for the social sciences just as physics provides a foundation for the engineering disciplines. Accordingly, second order economics (i.e., second order thinking within a specific field) can be thought of as an example of second order cybernetics, a more general scientific perspective. 1. Stuart A. Umpleby is professor at the Department of Management, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Stuart A. Umpleby George Soros made the connection between cybernetics and economics, since his reflexivity theory is quite compatible with second order cybernetics (Soros, 1987). Soros has pointed out that economic systems are composed of people who both observe and participate. He emphasizes that social systems are fundamentally different from physical systems. Participants have biases, and they change their minds. Furthermore, theories not only describe the behavior of social systems, when acted upon, they also change their functioning. Equilibrium Theory and Behavioral Economics For many years social scientists have sought to emulate the physical sciences. Economists were the most successful. Equilibrium theory in economics uses the model of self-organization or what is currently called complexity theory (Umpleby, 2010). According to this theory, when the economic system is disturbed, it returns quickly to equilibrium. People are assumed to be rational profit seekers. They are assumed to have access to the same information as everyone else, and everyone is assumed to have complete information. In recent years economists have been developing the idea of behavioral economics, which seeks to modify the idealized assumptions of equilibrium theory. For example, behavioral economists point out that people are often not rational, and they do not have equal access to information. Other Assumptions Underlying Economics There are other assumptions underlying economics and its effort to emulate the physical sciences. For example, the classical philosophy of science, which guided the development of the physical sciences, is based on the assumption that observations are independent of the characteristics of the observer. A related idea is that theories do not change the phenomenon being studied. These assumptions work in most cases in the physical sciences, but they do not fit the social sciences. Social scientists are quite aware that social theories affect the behavior of social systems. Indeed, that is why they create new theories. They hope that people will accept the new theories, act on them, and the social system will operate better. However, when social scientists do research, they often assume that theories have no effect. Hence, there is a gap between the way social scientists think when they speak to the general public and the way they think when they do research. The attempt to emulate the physical sciences and the apparent success in doing so, can lead to another assumption, namely that theories progress from good to better. One consequence of this idea is that the history of economic thought is no longer taught in many U.S. universities. In the physical sciences the history of ideas is the way the subject is taught, with one theory building on previous theories. But the history of ideas was discarded in economics for at least two reasons. First, it was thought that there was not enough Second-Order Economics 3 time in the curriculum to teach the older ideas, since there was so much new material to cover. Second, the older theories were often described as vague or speculative in comparison with modern quantitative approaches. If the history of economic thought is added to the curriculum once again and the consequences of theories are considered, then economics will have entered the realm of reflexivity (Soros, 1987). Taking account of the interaction between economic theories and society is what is meant by second-order economics. It is an effort to include the observers (i.e., economists, not just investors or market participants) in the domain of economics. Consequences of the Financial Crisis The 2008 financial crisis produced a rapid return to an earlier economic theory (e.g., Keynes’s recommendation for government intervention during a recession). This change from the widespread belief in the near universal utility of markets has called attention to oscillations in economic thought, not just progress. Swings occur between the idea that government intervention can be helpful and the idea that markets can solve all problems. The financial crisis has called attention to the fact that economic theories do not always progress from good to better. Rather, there are cyclical swings in the theoretical position that has the most followers. Consequently, the currently prevailing theory does not make previous theories obsolete. Older theories may be needed again. Indeed, both theories may be needed in order to achieve both growth and fair distribution of wealth. The general public is quite aware of the competition between theories. There is even a rap song on You Tube about the competition between the ideas of Keynes and Hayek (“Fear the Boom and Bust,” 2011). Following the financial crisis and a renewed interest in government regulation of markets, there has been a return to Keynes’s ideas about the appropriate role of government in the economy. This return to earlier ideas may lead to more attention to economic theories as fundamental parts of an economy. How the prevailing first-order theory changes is the subject matter of second-order economics. How to Model Second-Order Economics Currently economics is defined more by its method than by the subject matter or by events such as crises or central bank decisions. If reflexivity is to be accepted within economics, some modeling method will be needed. What needs to be modeled is the changes in point of view regarding markets and the role of government. Anatole Kaletsky (2010) has described four stages in capitalism: 1) A laissez faire approach to macroeconomics followed the stock market crash of 1929. 2) An interventionist period, based on the theories of John Maynard Keynes began during the 1930s. 3) A movement toward fewer state-owned enterprises and less government regulation was based on the theories of Frederick Hayek and Milton Friedman. 4) A return to the belief that some government regulation is necessary followed the financial crisis of 4 Stuart A. Umpleby 2008. Hence, there are cycles based on the temporary dominance of either government regulation or free market thinking. These influence cycles have a similar structure and can be modeled with the same methods as credit cycles or leverage cycles (Geanakoplos, 2009). Economic theories can be viewed not only as descriptions but also as means for controlling the economy. Political leaders select among economic theories and choose those that benefit their constituents. This analysis is already part of political science, but should it also be part of economics? Should the use of economic theories to manage the economy be part of economics, formally as well as informally? Probably not if the current view of economics as method continues. But possibly so if the history of economic thought is reintroduced into economics curricula. Theories as part of the control system of the economy would be a part of second order economics and would be an example of reflexivity theory. Selection of an economic theory would then be a type of policy, similar to fiscal policy or monetary policy. Currently there is increased interest in comparative economics, for example, comparing the approach to managing the economy in the U.S., Germany, and China.
Recommended publications
  • Warren Mcculloch and the British Cyberneticians
    Warren McCulloch and the British cyberneticians Article (Accepted Version) Husbands, Phil and Holland, Owen (2012) Warren McCulloch and the British cyberneticians. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 37 (3). pp. 237-253. ISSN 0308-0188 This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/43089/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk Warren McCulloch and the British Cyberneticians1 Phil Husbands and Owen Holland Dept. Informatics, University of Sussex Abstract Warren McCulloch was a significant influence on a number of British cyberneticians, as some British pioneers in this area were on him.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dictionary of Cybernetics
    Annenberg School for Communication Departmental Papers (ASC) University of Pennsylvania Year 1986 A Dictionary of Cybernetics Klaus Krippendorff University of Pennsylvania, kkrippendorff@asc.upenn.edu This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. http://repository.upenn.edu/asc papers/224 A DICTIONARY OF CYBERNETICS by Klaus Krippendorff University of Pennsylvania version 2/2/86 A dictionary like the discipline whose terminology it aims to clarify is constantly in flux. It is aided by communal efforts and in turn aids communication within the community of users. Critical comments and suggestions, especially for including new or omitting useless entries, for improving the wording, for references that may need to be added should be directed to: Klaus Krippendorff The Annenberg School of Communications University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA 19104 NOTE: This dictionary is not intended to represent the American Society for Cybernetics nor the opinions of any of its members: neither does it replace the current Cybernetics Glossary. Klaus Krippendorff has been kind enough to make his work available to ASC members in order to stimulate discussion on the language of cybernetics. as well as on the idea of a dictionary itself. ABSOLUTE DISCRIMINATION: ->LIMIT OF ABSOLUTE DISCRIMINATION ADAPTATION: STABILITY of success in the face of a changing environment. Two kinds of adaptation are distinguished. (a) Darwinian adaptation after Darwin who observed how organisms change their internal STRUCTURE when their environment makes existing forms no longer viable. E.g., Ashby's HOMEOSTAT searches for a new pattern of behavior as soon as disturbances in its surroundings drive or threaten to drive its essential VARIABLEs outside specified limits.
    [Show full text]
  • Cybernetics, Economics, and Philosophy in the German Democratic Republic
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Theses Department of History Spring 5-7-2011 Red Helmsman: Cybernetics, Economics, and Philosophy in the German Democratic Republic Kevin T. Baker Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Baker, Kevin T., "Red Helmsman: Cybernetics, Economics, and Philosophy in the German Democratic Republic." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2011. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses/47 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RED HELMSMAN: CYBERNETICS, ECONOMICS, AND PHILOSOPHY IN THE GERMAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC by KEVIN T. BAKER Under the Direction of Jared Poley ABSTRACT Cybernetics, despite being initially rejected in the Eastern Bloc throughout the 1950s for ideological reasons, rose to a high level of institutional prominence in the 1960s, profoundly influencing state philosophy and economic planning. This thesis is an examination of this transition, charting the development of cybernetics from the object of the Sozialistische Einheitspartei Deutschlands’s (SED) opprobrium to one of the major philosophical currents within the party intelligentsia. INDEX WORDS: East Germany, Marxism, History of science, Economics, Cybernetics, Philosophy, Cold War, Information theory, Georg Klaus, Walter Ulbricht RED HELMSMAN: CYBERNETICS, ECONOMICS, AND PHILOSOPHY IN THE GERMAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC by KEVIN T. BAKER A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of the Arts in the College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University 2011 Copyright by Kevin T.
    [Show full text]
  • Adventures Beyond Reductionism. the Remarkable Unfolding of Complex Holism: Sustainability Science
    Adventures Beyond Reductionism. The Remarkable Unfolding of Complex Holism: Sustainability Science A. Sengupta Institute for Complex Holism, Kolkata, INDIA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down”. Can Darwinian random mutations and selection generate biological complexity and holism? In this paper we argue that the “wonderful but not enough” tools of linear reductionism cannot lead to chaos and hence to complexity and holism, but with ChaNoXity this seems indeed plausible, even likely. Based on the Pump-Engine realism of mutually interacting supply and demand — demand institutes supply that fuels demand — we demonstrate that the “supply” of symmetry breaking Darwinian genetic variation, in direct conflict with the symmetry inducing “demand” of natural selection, defines the antagonistic arrows of the real and negative worlds. Working in this competitively collaborating nonlinear mode, these opposites generate the homeostasy of holistic life. Protein folding, mitosis, meiosis, hydrophobicity and other ingredients have their respective expressions in this paradigm; nucleotide substitution, gene duplication-divergence, HGT, stress-induced mutations, antibiotic resistance, Lamarckism would appear to fit in naturally in this complexity paradigm defined through emergence of novelty and self-organization. With obvious departures from mainstream reductionism, this can have far reaching implications in the Darwinian and nano medicine of genetic diseases and disorders. Our goal is to chart a roadmap of adventure beyond (neo)-Darwinian reductionism. Keywords: Chanoxity; Reductionism; Darwinian Holism; Self-organization and Emergence; Demand, Sup- ply, Logistic. 1 Introduction: Beyond Reductionism Biological systems are complex holistic systems: thermodynamically open and far-from-equilibrium, self organizing, emergent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cybernetic Brain
    THE CYBERNETIC BRAIN THE CYBERNETIC BRAIN SKETCHES OF ANOTHER FUTURE Andrew Pickering THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS CHICAGO AND LONDON ANDREW PICKERING IS PROFESSOR OF SOCIOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF EXETER. HIS BOOKS INCLUDE CONSTRUCTING QUARKS: A SO- CIOLOGICAL HISTORY OF PARTICLE PHYSICS, THE MANGLE OF PRACTICE: TIME, AGENCY, AND SCIENCE, AND SCIENCE AS PRACTICE AND CULTURE, A L L PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS, AND THE MANGLE IN PRAC- TICE: SCIENCE, SOCIETY, AND BECOMING (COEDITED WITH KEITH GUZIK). THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS, CHICAGO 60637 THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS, LTD., LONDON © 2010 BY THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PUBLISHED 2010 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 1 2 3 4 5 ISBN-13: 978-0-226-66789-8 (CLOTH) ISBN-10: 0-226-66789-8 (CLOTH) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Pickering, Andrew. The cybernetic brain : sketches of another future / Andrew Pickering. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-226-66789-8 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-226-66789-8 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Cybernetics. 2. Cybernetics—History. 3. Brain. 4. Self-organizing systems. I. Title. Q310.P53 2010 003’.5—dc22 2009023367 a THE PAPER USED IN THIS PUBLICATION MEETS THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD FOR INFORMATION SCIENCES—PERMA- NENCE OF PAPER FOR PRINTED LIBRARY MATERIALS, ANSI Z39.48-1992. DEDICATION For Jane F. CONTENTS Acknowledgments / ix 1. The Adaptive Brain / 1 2. Ontological Theater / 17 PART 1: PSYCHIATRY TO CYBERNETICS 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Order Cybernetics 31/08/2008 10:08
    SECOND ORDER CYBERNETICS 31/08/2008 10:08 Search Print this chapter Cite this chapter SECOND ORDER CYBERNETICS Ranulph Glanville, CybernEthics Research, UK and Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University, Australia Keywords: actor, analogy, argument, automata, autopoiesis, behavior, biology, Black_Box, causality, circularity, coding, cognition, communication, computation, concept, consciousness, control, conversation, cybernetics, description, design, distinction, ecology, education, environment, epistemology, error, ethics, feedback, form, function, generosity, goal, homeostasis, idea, identity, individual, information, interaction, internet, knowing, language, learning, logic, management, mathematics, meaning, mechanism, memory, meta-, metaphor, moment, mutualism, network, object, observe, organizational_closure, oscillation, person, phenomenon, philosophical, physics, positivist, (post-)_modernism, praxis, process, program, psychology, purpose, quality, reality, reason, recursion, relative, responsibility, science, second_order_cybernetics, (self-)_reference, semiotics, social, structure, subject, support, system, theory, thinking, time, truth, understanding, variety, whole_(and_part) Contents 1. Introduction: What Second Order Cybernetics is, and What it Offers 2. Background—the Logical Basis for Second Order Cybernetics 3. Second Order Cybernetics—Historical Overview 4. Theory of Second Order Cybernetics 5. Praxis of Second Order Cybernetics 6. A Note on Second Order Cybernetics and Constructivism 7. Cybernetics, Second Order
    [Show full text]
  • The Road to Servomechanisms: the Influence of Cybernetics on Hayek From
    The Road to Servomechanisms: The Influence of Cybernetics on Hayek from The Sensory Order to the Social Order by Gabriel Oliva CHOPE Working Paper No. 2015-11 October 2015 The Road to Servomechanisms: The Influence of Cybernetics on Hayek from The Sensory Order to the Social Order Gabriel Oliva University of São Paulo [email protected] October 2015 Abstract: This paper explores the ways in which cybernetics influenced the works of F. A. Hayek from the late 1940s onward. It shows that the concept of negative feedback, borrowed from cybernetics, was central to Hayek’s attempt of giving an explanation of the principle to the emergence of human purposive behavior. Next, the paper discusses Hayek’s later uses of cybernetic ideas in his works on the spontaneous formation of social orders. Finally, Hayek’s view on the appropriate scope of the use of cybernetics is considered. Keywords: Cybernetics, F. A. Hayek, Norbert Wiener, Garrett Hardin, Ludwig von Bertalanffy. JEL Codes: B25, B31, C60 2 The Road to Servomechanisms: The Influence of Cybernetics on Hayek from The Sensory Order to the Social Order1 Gabriel Oliva When I began my work I felt that I was nearly alone in working on the evolutionary formation of such highly complex self-maintaining orders. Meanwhile, researches on this kind of problem – under various names, such as autopoiesis, cybernetics, homeostasis, spontaneous order, self-organisation, synergetics, systems theory, and so on – have become so numerous that I have been able to study closely no more than a few of them. (Hayek, 1988, p. 9) 1. Introduction It is widely recognized in the literature2 that the Austrian economist F.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Cybernetics
    ~26 ~ ВІСНИК Київського національного університету імені Тараса Шевченка ISSN1728-3817 Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics, 2020; 1(208): 26-32 УДК 336.7 JEL classification: G2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2020/208-1/3 K. Lawler, Professor ORCID iD 0000-002-3409-6755 University of Kuwait, Kuwait, A. O. Moscardini, Visiting Professor Cardiff Metropolitan University, UK, ORCID ID 0000-0003-4951-0848, T. Vlasova, Visiting Research Fellow ORCID iD 0000-0002-5000-6756 Northumbria University, UK, D. Mubarak, Teaching Assistant ORCID iD 0000-0003-3734-1856 University of Kuwait, Kuwait ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS This paper begins with a consideration of the work of Leijonhufvud, who, in the 1960's, introduced what he termed "cybernetics" to correct many of the perceived weaknesses in macroeconomic theory. The authors use current advances in systems thinking to develop their own definition of Cybernetics and provide an example to illustrate how this definition of cybernetics can produce meaningful economic questions. The paper concludes with a synthesis of economic and cybernetic ideas which is termed "Economic Cybernetics". This term is common in the former Soviet countries but is unfamiliar to western audiences. Keywords: Economics, Cybernetics, Mathematics. 1. Introduction sub discipline area are besmirched. A negative feedback The following quote is taken by from a recent paper by loop develops where the reputation of Economics declines the 2018 Nobel prize winner, Paul Romer. and, if not corrected, result in its death [22]. For more than three decades, macroeconomics has The main research agenda for Leijonhufvud [15] was gone backwards. The treatment of identification now is no to completely debunk the Hicks-Hansen interpretation of more credible than in the early 1970's but escapes challenge the General Theory that focused on the aggregative because it is so much more opaque.
    [Show full text]
  • Gregory Bateson, Cybernetics, and the Social/Behavioral Sciences
    GREGORY BATESON, CYBERNETICS, AND THE SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES ABSTRACT Gregory Bateson's interdisciplinary work in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology was profoundly influenced by the ideas set forth in systems theory, communication theory, information theory and cybernetics. As is now quite common, Bateson used the single term cybernetics in reference to an aggregate of these ideas that grew together shortly after World War II. For him, cybernetics, or communication theory, or information theory, or systems theory, together constituted a unified set of ideas, and he was among the first to appreciate the fact that the patterns of organization and relational symmetry evident in all living systems are indicative of mind. Here, we must not forget that due to the nineteenth century polemic between science and religion, any consideration of purpose and plan, e.g., mental process, had been a priori excluded from science as non-empirical, or immeasurable. Any reference to mind as an explanatory or causal principle had been banned from biology. Even in the social/behavioral sciences, references to mind remained suspect. Building on the work of Norbert Wiener, Warren McCulloch, and W. Ross Ashby, Bateson realized that it is precisely mental process or mind which must be investigated. Thus, he formulated the criteria of mind and the cybernetic epistemology that are pivotal elements in his "ecological philosophy." In fact, he referred to cybernetics as an epistemology: e.g., the model, itself, is a means of knowing what sort of world this is, and also the limitations that exist concerning our ability to know something (or perhaps nothing) of such matters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cybernetic Hypothesis
    THE CYBERNETIC HYPOTHESIS "We can imagine a time when the machine of governance would replace - for better or worse, who knows? - the insufficiency of the minds and devices of politics that are customary today." - Father Dominique Dubarle, Le Monde, December 28th 1948 "There is a striking contrast between the conceptual refinement and dedication characterizing scientific and technical reasoning and the summary and imprecise style that characterizes political reasoning... One even asks oneself whether this is a kind of unsurpassable situation marking the definitive limits of rationality, or if one may hope that this impotence might be overcome someday and collective life be entirely rationalized." - An encyclopedist cybernetician writing in the 1970s I "There is probably no domain of man's thinking or material activity that cybernetics will not come to have a role in someday." Georges Boulanger, Dossier on Cybernetics: utopia or science of tomorrow in the world today, 1968. "The world circumscribing us [the "circumverse"] aims to have stable circuits, equal cycles, the expected repetitions, and trouble-free compatibility. It intends to eliminate all partial impulses and immobilize bodies. Parallel to this, Borges discussed the anxiety of the emperor who wanted to have such an exact map of the empire that he would have to go back over his territory at all its points and bring it up to scale, so much so that the monarch's subjects spent as much time and energy detailing it and maintaining it that the empire ‘itself’ fell into ruins to the exact extent that its cartographical overview was perfected -- such is the madness of the great central Zero, its desire to immobilize bodies that can only ever ‘be’ as representation." Jean-Francois Lyotard, Libidinal Economy, 1973.
    [Show full text]
  • Heinz Von Foerster
    Understanding Understanding: Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition Heinz von Foerster Springer UECPR 11/9/02 12:11 PM Page i Understanding Understanding UECPR 11/9/02 12:11 PM Page ii Springer New York Berlin Heidelberg Hong Kong London Milan Paris Tokyo UECPR 11/9/02 12:11 PM Page iii Heinz von Foerster Understanding Understanding Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition With 122 Illustrations 1 3 UECPR 11/9/02 12:11 PM Page iv Heinz von Foerster Biological Computer Laboratory, Emeritus University of Illinois Urbana, IL 61801 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data von Foerster, Heinz, 1911– Understanding understanding: essays on cybernetics and cognition / Heinz von Foerster. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-387-95392-2 (acid-free paper) 1. Cybernetics. 2. Cognition. I. Title. Q315.5 .V64 2002 003¢.5—dc21 2001057676 ISBN 0-387-95392-2 Printed on acid-free paper. © 2003 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analy- sis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adapta- tion, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling a Socio-Political System for Public Policy Cybernetics
    MODELING A SOCIO-POLITICAL SYSTEM FOR PUBLIC POLICY CYBERNETICS By Paris Arnopoulos Professor Emeritus Concordia University Montreal, Canada Abstract Mathematical model-building in the social sciences is concentrated so far in economics, leaving politics far behind. Based on a recent paradigm of Sociophysics, this article attempts an interdisciplinary general system model that combines all three social sectors: economics, politics, and ethnics. To do so, this preliminary study proceeds by a formalization of systems theory, along with its structures and functions. Because of its wide scope, the model is necessarily theoretical and fundamental, leaving specifics to later specialized studies. As such, this primary attempt incorporates the concepts of political power and economic wealth into the same model, thus indicating a simple way to approach a more realistic representation of society. Key-words: Sociophysics; Sociopolitics; Sociocybernetics; Formal Modeling; Policy-Making. Addresses 104-1605 Dr. Penfield Avenue Kapetan Xrona 33 Montreal, H3H 1B2, Canada Athens 115-25, Greece 504-931-2213 210-674-6253 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 I - THEORETICAL SYSTEMS 1.1 The Social System 4 Structure Diagram 5 1.2 Formal Models 6 1.3 Conceptual Framework 8 II - FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS 2.1 System Functions 10 2.2 Structural Components 12 Flows Diagram 14 2.3 Feedback Systems 15 III - ANALYTICAL METHODS 3.1 Multivariate Analysis 16 3.2 Cybernetic Systems 18 3.3 Political Sub-system 19 Political Sector Diagram 21 CONCLUSION 23 BIBLIOGRAPHY 24 INTRODUCTION Model building is a well-established activity in many disciplines. Models try to describe, explain or prescribe particular aspects of structures or processes with a view to improving our understanding or control of various systems.
    [Show full text]