Including Johnson Creek, Reed Lake, Crystal Springs, Powell

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Including Johnson Creek, Reed Lake, Crystal Springs, Powell JOHNSON CREEK BASIN PROTECTION PLAN Including JOHNSON CREEK, REED LAKE, CRYSTAL SPRINGS POWELL BUTTE, AND MT. SCOTT AREAS INVENTORY, ANALYSIS, AND REGULATIONS for the CONSERVATION AND GENERAL MANAGEMENT OF WETLANDS, WATER BODIES, OPEN SPACES, AND WILDLIFE HABITAT AREAS Bureau of Planning City of Portland Adopted by City Council July 17, 1991 Effective August 16, 1991 Portland City Council 1. E. Bud Clark, Mayor Earl Blumenauer, Commissioner Dick Bogle, Commissioner Gretchen Kafoury, Commissioner Michael Lindberg, Commissioner Portland Planning Commission Martha Peck Andrews, President Richard Cooley, Vice President Stan Amy Estill Deitz Margaret Kirkpatrick Richard Michaelson Chet Orloff Vivian Parker JOHNSON CREEK BASIN PROTECTION PLAN Including: JOHNSON CREEK, REED LAKE, CRYSTAL SPRINGS POWELL BUTTE, AND MT. SCOTT AREAS Bureau of Planning Gretchen Kafoury, Commissioner-In-Charge Robert E. Stacey, Jr., Planning Director Robert E. Clay, Chief Planner, Long Range Planning and Urban Design Project Planners Gail Curtis, City Planner Duncan Brown, Senior City Planner Esther Lev, Wildlife Biologist Project Team Tim Brooks, City Planner Geoff Sauncy, Graphic lllustrator Nancy Ryan, Planning Intern Adopted by City Council July 17, 1991 Effective August 16, 1991 Ordinance No. 164472 TABLE OF CONTENTS page Background Information Chapter 1 Introduction Purpose 5 Vision 5 Summary 5 Basin Study Area 7 Regulatory Setting 8 Public Involvement 13 Chapter 2 Background Introduction 17 Flooding 17 Geology 18 Water Quality and Quantity 18 Chapter 3 Components of the Natural Resource Area Introduction 23 Components 23 Summary 27 Chapter 4 Natural Resource Inventory Process Introduction 31 Site Selection 31 Methodology 32 Summary 32 Chapter 5 Inventory of Natural Hazard Components Introduction 35 Classification ofElements 35 Existing Regulations 35 Summary 36 Chapter 6 Inventory of Urban Design Components Introduction 39 History 39 Urban Design Components 39 Classification ofElements 40 Summary 40 • page Analysis of Economic, Social, Environmental, and Energy Consequences Chapter 7 General Analysis of Natural Resource Values and Economic, Social, Environmental, and Energy Consequences of Resource Protection Introduction 45 Economic Consequences 45 Social Consequences 48 Environmental Consequences 49 Energy Consequences 52 Summary 54 Chapter 8 Inventory Site Summaries and Site Analysis of Natural Resource Valued Including the Site-Specific Analysis of Economic, Social, Environmental, and Energy Consequences of Resource Protection Introduction 61 How to Use This Chapter 61 Site Summaries 63 Protection Plan Chapter 9 Protection Measures for the Johnson Creek Basin Introduction 127 Protection Plan Policies and Objectives 128 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 133 Application of the Environmental Zone 133 Johnson Creek Basin Plan District 134 Guidelines 136 Model Areas Concept 141 Appendices A Glossary of Common Tenus 145 • B Johnson Creek Basin Plan District Regulations 149 (City Code Chapter 33.535) C Existing Environmental Zone Regulations ISS (City Code Chapter 33.430) page Appendices (continued) D Existing Nonconfonning Use Regulations 167 (City Code Chapter 33.258) E Portland Plant List 173 F Wildlife Habitat Assessment Form 185 G Johnson Creek Corridor Committee Mission 187 Statement and Program Goals H Statewide Planning Goal 5 Open Spaces, 189 Scenic and Historic Areas, and Natural Resources I Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 660, 191 Division 16 Requirements and Application Procedures for Complying with Statewide Goal 5 J ORS 308.740-790 195 K (Partial) Bibliography 199 L Maps ofInventory Sites and Environmental and separate Plan District Zoning document BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE· VISION· SUMMARY· STUDY AREA· REGULATORY SETTING· State Local Regional Federal PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT· 3 PURPOSE The purpose of the Johnson Creek Basin Protection Plan is to identify, evaluate, and protect significant fish and wildlife habitats, ecologically and scientifically significant natural areas, open spaces, water bodies, wetlands, and the functions and values of the Johnson Creek basin as a whole, and to adopt management recommendations on specific ways to retain and restore the natural habitat areas and values. The plan is designed to comply with Statewide Planning Goal 5. VISION The Johnson Creek basin will be a beautiful natural resource that is carefully planned and nurtured, thanks to the collective efforts ofresidents, organizations, and the city. The creek will become a unique visual and functional unifying element to southeast Portland, providing neighborhood character and a sense ofplace, as well as a stormwater drainage system, wildlife corridor, recreation area, and source ofpride for Portland. Damage from high flood waters will be history. The quality of the water will be improved to the point that natural runs of anadromous fish will be re-established to levels of the past. Development will be complementary to the needs of the creek basin, so that a harmonious balance between people and nature will exist. A sense of shared stewardship for all landowners and recreational users ofthe creek will reflect the pride and commitment upheld by those who recognize it as a natural resource to be preserved for all. SUMMARY Protecting identified natural resources in the Johnson Creek corridor will occur at various levels in the land use regulation hierarchy: adoption of Comprehensive Plan policies and objectives relating directly to the Johnson Creek basin, modification of base zone densities where appropriate, application of the Environmental Zone, relocation ofthe Recreation Trail designation from the edge of Johnson Creek to the newly-purchased Springwater Line (previously known as the Belrose Line) railroad right-of-way, and modification of the Powell Butte!Mt. Scott Plan District to apply 10 much of the Johnson Creek basin. The plan district generally will protect the natural resources in three ways: I Limit housing densities in areas that are difficult or hazardous to build on due to physical constraints such as floodways, steep slopes, floodplains, or wetlands. The existing Powell Butte!Mt. Scott Plan District limits housing densities to 1.05 to 4.20 units per acre, depending on the presence ofconditions which make building hazardous. The Johnson Creek Plan District expands the Powell Butte!Mt. Scott Plan District for the length of Johnson Creek within the Portland city limits. 2 Expand plan district requirements to include protection of natural resource and neighborhood values. In addition to the variable zoning density requirements, the plan district is amended to protect resource characteristics which have been identified as having water quality, environmental, or neighborhood value. These include: exemptions for certain activities in Environmental-zoned areas which are compatible with neighborhood character and protected resources; retention of treed areas and native landscaping to aid in groundwater recharge, provide more habitat, control erosion, and continue the semi-rural neighborhood character; and provision of stormwater detention or retention facilities to improve water quality, aid in groundwater recharge, and reduce peak flood levels. 5 7"=- -- BEAVERTON Legend Johnson Creek Basin Plan District :!.~ Johnson Creek Keg) Watershed JOHNSON CREEK WATERSHED 6 3 Protect or restore habitat within the resource area as an approval criteria for new development. This is accomplished either through environmental review for proposed development in Environmental zones, or plan district regulations. The level or threshold for improvements depends upon the amount ofproposed development. Emphasis is on: protecting or restoring riparian areas along Johnson Creek, its tributaries, and drainageways; connecting upland resource areas such as parks, steep slopes, and major forested areas with the creek corridor to aid in the passage of wildlife; and promoting the use of native vegetation (especially trees) throughout the plan district. BASIN STUDY AREA Johnson Creek extends through the cities of Milwaukie, Portland, and Gresham, as well as portions of unincorporated Multnomah and Clackamas Counties. The total Johnson Creek drainage basin is about 54 square miles in size (of which only 44 square miles contribute runoff), and up to three miles wide. It also includes the cities of Cottrell, Boring, and Happy Valley. Within southeast, Portland Johnson Creek follows a generally east-west path parallel to Foster Road and the Springwater Line, a railroad right-of-way recently purchased by the City. The study area extends from SE 174th Avenue and SE Jenne Road west to Johnson Creek's confluence with the Willamette River in the City of Milwaukie, and from the southern city limits along the crest of the Boring Lava Hills northward, encompassing Powell Butte, Beggar's Tick Marsh, Crystal Springs Creek, Reed Lake, and other natural resources related to the creek. It includes the westerly 13 miles ofthe creek's total 25 mile length, its tributaries and riparian areas, as well as wetlands and well as uplands which add to the natural resource values of the basin. As part of this plan, resource protection is for only those areas within the City of Portland jurisdictional limits, although resources outside city limits were inventoried. For example, there is stretch of the creek between SE 45th and SE 76th Avenues that has been inventoried but not analyzed because it is in either unincorporated Clackamas County or the City of Milwaukie. Between SE
Recommended publications
  • Title 13 – Nature in Neighborhoods R Equest for Metro Determination of Substantial Compliance
    TITLE 13 – NATURE IN NEIGHBORHOODS R equest for Metro Determination of Substantial Compliance December 2012 Accepted by Portland City Council November 28, 2012 www.portlandoregon.gov/bps The Bureaus of Planning and Sustainability and Transportation are committed to providing equal access to information and hearings. If you need special accommodation, please call 503-823-7700, the City’s TTY at 503-823-6868, or the Oregon Relay Service at 1-800-735-2900. To obtain a copy of this document or more information about this project, please contact: Roberta Jortner, Senior Environmental Planner Bureau of Planning and Sustainability 1900 SW 4th Avenue, Suite 7100 Portland, OR 97201 Phone: 503-823-7855 | Email: [email protected] II TITLE 13, NATURE IN NEIGHBORHOODS – CITY OF PORTLAND COMPLIANCE REQUEST – DECEMBER 2012 A cknowledgements City Council B ureau of Environmental Services Sam Adams, Mayor and Commissioner in Charge Shannah Anderson Nick Fish Jane Bacchieri Amanda Fritz Susan Barthel Randy Leonard Mitch Bixby Dan Saltzman Eli Callison Amber Clayton Planning and Sustainability Commission Sara Culp Linda Dobson André Baugh, Chair Rhonda Fast Howard Shapiro, Vice Chair Robert Fraley Michelle Rudd, Vice Chair Emily Hauth Karen Gray Dawn Hottenroth Don Hanson Michele Juon Mike Houck Jennifer Karps Lai-Lani Ovalles Paul Ketcham Jill Sherman Kaitlin Lovell Chris Smith Dominic Maze Mike Rosen B ureau of Planning and Sustainability Darian Santner Susan Anderson, Director Marie Johnson Walkiewicz Joe Zehnder, Chief Planner Sallie
    [Show full text]
  • Nificant Natural Area Sites and Interconnections
    .~­ ". \ i' .- / ,.• --- ./ \. \ ~ • I. • h j . .LC .' \. \ \ '.', ."'- /_ ,I • ~, I • ,{ \ I j .' ,,'" "..', r -, " (. ) ./ ..~, / / --)" ( , / '- L • r-( ."• \ " • ." L •~ rr ('., r I" ~••. / r ~ ). ," , \ . ) / ) •. ~ \ '-: '.' / -' ", ,'; ---' -, ", - ( '..\~ , " ' '. ,J \. ) .~ .\ / -" ,e.' ·r ","." ~ METROPOLITAN - e> )~ .' \ I" e :\(?-reel1space~, :- J • 'f /' r: /. ..../ .J \ • ~.' / l .. 'v' /". • '> I / I e-, ~ ./ ,I \ • .>" ) Master-Piait ) e• .,/ r ", / Ij .'-..... L e "'" '. \ e ( r e /. e e, , --- '~. e j -.', ,.­ ;' r .. •er, ) r / -'. ~ \' - ( . ~ . ., ~ ~' -\ A Cooperative Regio!lal$ystem ofNa.tural Areas, "Open Space, T~f!:..ils a~¢ Gree.nways / /', ' '.)' " forWilcJlife and p,!ople . ./( . ./ ,... ' .... / r • '. X- •.\ / e ! -, "e- ( \ - '- '\ .J • r~gional go~ernmeht (As' ofJuly 1992) "- (. • Metro is the 'directly elected thatserves , .. ,/ Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington cOUlities andilie 24 Policy Advisory COn:'!m,ittee M,ember;s: • \'citiesThat make up the P~rtlana metropolita~;rea. " "'- Ri~hard Devlin, Metro councilor and chair •e- Metr~is ;~spon~ible f~r soli~:~aste management, op~ration/of Ruth~cFariana, Metro,co~n;ilor rmd vice-chair ,_ .i ,'-- M~tro us~ \, the Washington Park Zoo, transportation-and land Sandi Hansen/Metro councilor " "- ~" ' pl~nping, 1da~inerstad, commissi~ne~ urban growth boundary management, technical ." J Judie Clackamas County . ,. services to local go\\ernments and, 'through the Metropolitan Pauline Anderson, Multnomah County commissioner ) r·, ) : fxposition)Recre,ation Gommission,man~gementofthe
    [Show full text]
  • Sub-Area: Southeast
    PARKS 2020 VISION OUTHEAST Distinctive Features Studio in the Laurelhurst Park annex is a satellite of the Montavilla Community Center. I Aquatic facilities include Sellwood, Mt. Scott, Description: The Southeast sub-area (see map at the Buckman, Montavilla and Creston. end of this section) contains many of the city's older, I established neighborhoods. This area is a patchwork of The Community Music Center is in this sub-area. older, mainly single-family neighborhoods divided by I The Southeast sub-area has three Community linear commercial corridors. The Central Eastside Schools and 45 school sites. Industrial District, which borders the east bank of the I There are lighted baseball stadiums at Willamette, separates some residential neighborhoods Westmoreland and Lents Parks. from the river. Resources and Facilities: Southeast has 898 acres Population – Current and Future: The Southeast of parkland, ranking third in total amount of park sub-area ranks first in population with 154,000 and acreage. Most parks are developed, well distributed, is projected to grow to 157,830 by 2020, an increase in good condition, and can accommodate a range of of 2%. recreational uses. I Southeast has the City’s largest combined acreage DISTRIBUTION OF SUBAREA ACRES BY PARK TYPE of neighborhood and community parks. I Southeast has a variety of habitat parks, including Oaks Bottom Wildlife Refuge, Tideman Johnson Park, and Johnson Creek Park that are popular sites for hiking, birding, walking, and general recreation use. I This sub-area includes part of the I-205 Bike Trail and about 4.6 miles of the Springwater Corridor, a 195-acre 16.5 mile-long regional trailway that includes many natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource Inventory
    Natural Resource Inventory PORTLAND PLAN BACKGROUND REPORT FALL 2009 Acknowledgments Natural Resource Inventory Bureau of Planning and Sustainability (BPS) PROSPERITY AND BUSINESS SUCCESS Mayor Sam Adams, Commissioner-in-charge Susan Anderson, Director SUSTAINABILITY AND THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Joe Zehnder, Chief Planner Steve Dotterrer, Principal Planner Eric Engstrom, Principal Planner DESIGN, PLANNING AND PUBLIC SPACES Gil Kelley, Former Director, Bureau of Planning Project Team NEIGHBORHOODS & HOUSING Roberta Jortner, Environmental Planning Manager, BPS Mindy Brooks; Shannon Buono; Katie Hinman; TRANSPORTATION, TECHNOLOGY AND ACCESS Kevin Martin; Chris Scarzello; Elliot Scott Document Cartography and Design EDUCATION AND SKILL DEVELOPMENT Gary Odenthal, GIS Coordinator, BPS Christine Rains, Graphic Designer, BPS Contributors HUMAN HEALTH, FOOD AND PUBLIC SAFETY Bureau of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Group, with special recognition of: QUALITY OF LIFE, CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AND EQUITY Shannon Axtell; Jennifer Devlin; Dawn Hottenroth; Dave Helzer; Josh Robben; Chris Prescott; Ry Thompson; Ali Young ARTS, CULTURE AND INNOVATION Bureau of Parks and Recreation Mart Hughes; Deborah Lev Metro Lori Hennings; Justin Houk; Paul Ketcham Project Technical Reviewers Susan Barnes, Patty Snow, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; Tom Bouillion, Port of Portland; Bob Eaton, Dave Hendricks, Multnomah County Drainage District; Paul Fishman, SWCA Environmental Consultants; Karen Font Williams, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality; Mike Houck, Urban Greenspaces Institute; Jim Labbe, Bob Sallinger, Audubon Society of Portland; Tom McGuire, Adolfson Associates; Nancy Munn, NOAA Fisheries; Jennifer Thompson, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Alan Yeakley, Portland State University To help ensure equal access to City programs, services and activities, the City of Portland will reasonably modify policies/procedures and provide auxiliary aids/services to persons with disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Area Acquisition Strategy
    Natural Area Acquisition Strategy November 2006 Natural Area Acquisition Strategy Prepared By: Portland Parks & Recreation Project Staff: Deborah Lev, Senior Planner, Natural Resources Joshua Darling, GIS Technician Janet Bebb, Strategic Planning Manager David McAllister, Senior Manager, City Nature Accepted by City Council: November, 2006 1120 SW 5th Ave., Suite 1302 www.PortlandParks.org Portland, OR 97204 Commissioner Dan Saltzman Tel: (503) 823-7529 Fax: (503) 823-6007 Director Zari Santner Sustaining a healthy park and recreation system to make Portland a great place to live, work and play. Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................ 1 Vision & Benefits .................................................................... 5 Historic Background .............................................................. 7 Partnerships ............................................................................ 9 Current System ..................................................................... 11 Approach ............................................................................... 13 Implementation Strategy ...................................................... 19 Issues ..................................................................................... 21 Selected References .............................................................. 23 Introduction “The city and region have an interconnected system of trails, parks, natural areas, streams, and rivers that are well protected
    [Show full text]
  • Abundance and Distribution of Fish Species in City of Portland Streams
    ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF FISH SPECIES IN CITY OF PORTLAND STREAMS COMPLETION REPORT 2009 Project Period: 1 March 2008 to 30 June 2009 Prepared by: Erick S. Van Dyke Adam J. Storch Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Ocean Salmon and Columbia River Program Clackamas, OR Prepared for: City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services Portland, OR 97204-1912 IGA Number 020-8038 December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT........................................................................................................................................ i INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................1 STUDY AREA ...................................................................................................................................2 METHODS .........................................................................................................................................5 Seasonal Fish Assemblage and Abundance...............................................................................6 Fish Presence in Summer Habitat Units ....................................................................................8 Index of Biotic Integrity.............................................................................................................9 RESULTS .........................................................................................................................................10 Seasonal Fish Assemblage and Abundance.............................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Greenspaces Accomplishment Report
    metropolitan Greenspaces program Summary of Accomplishments 1991-2005 Metro U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Regional Parks and Greenspaces Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office 600 NE Grand Avenue 2600 SE 98th Avenue, Ste. 100 Portland, Oregon 97232 Portland, Oregon 97266 (503) 797-1850 (503) 231-6179 January 2005 Table of Contents PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT ...................................................................................................... 2 METROPOLITAN GREENSPACES PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................. 2 PUBLICATIONS, PRODUCTS and GREENSPACES PROJECTS ............................................ 4 CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION GRANT PROJECTS ............................................... 7 ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION GRANT PROJECTS ........................................................ 32 SALMONID EDUCATION AND ENHANCEMENT GRANT PROJECTS ............................ 57 GREEN CITY DATA PROJECT ................................................................................................ 64 Authors: This report was written by Ron Klein, Mel Huie, Lynn Wilson, Deb Scrivens and Ilene Moss of Metro Regional Parks and Greenspaces and Jennifer Thompson with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office. Contacts: Kemper McMaster, State Supervisor Jennifer Thompson, Greenspaces Program Coordinator U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office 2600 SE 98th Avenue, Ste. 100 Portland, Oregon 97266 (503) 231-6179 Jim Desmond, Director Metro Regional Parks & Greenspaces 600
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Willamette River Environmental Dredging and Ecosystem Restoration Project
    LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING AND ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECT INTEGRATED FEASIBILITY STUDY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DRAFT FINAL REPORT March 2015 Prepared by: Tetra Tech, Inc. 1020 SW Taylor St. Suite 530 Portland, OR 97205 This page left blank intentionally EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Integrated Feasibility Study and Environmental Assessment (FS-EA) evaluates ecosystem restoration actions in the Lower Willamette River, led by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and the non-Federal sponsor, the City of Portland (City). The study area encompasses the Lower Willamette River Watershed and its tributaries, from its confluence with the Columbia River at River Mile (RM) 0 to Willamette Falls, located at RM 26. The goal of this study is to identify a cost effective ecosystem restoration plan that maximizes habitat benefits while minimizing impacts to environmental, cultural, and socioeconomic resources. This report contains a summary of the feasibility study from plan formulation through selection of a recommended plan, 35% designs and cost estimating, a description of the baseline conditions, and description of impacts that may result from implementation of the recommended plan. This integrated report complies with NEPA requirements. Sections 1500.1(c) and 1508.9(a) (1) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (as amended) require federal agencies to “provide sufficient evidence and analysis for determining whether to prepare an environmental impact statement or a finding of no significant impact” on actions authorized, funded, or carried out by the federal government to insure such actions adequately address “environmental consequences, and take actions that protect, restore, and enhance the environment." The Willamette River watershed was once an extensive and interconnected system of active channels, open slack waters, emergent wetlands, riparian forests, and adjacent upland forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Areas Restoration Plan October 2010
    Natural Areas Restoration Plan October 2010 Update: March 2015 Natural Areas Restoration Plan Update March 18, 2015 Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) completed the first system wide Natural Areas Restoration Plan (plan) in October 2010. The plan was completed as a requirement for Salmon Safe certification. It established restoration goals and strategies, management priorities and implementation actions. It is currently used to set restoration priorities (staff effort and funding) for natural areas. The plan stated that there would be a review and update every 3-5 years. The 2014 update modified the functional methodology and revised the weighting to remove the emphasis on salmonids and their habitat needs. The 2014 Natural Area Management Priority Matrix changes are based on the updated natural resource function methodology and ecological health determined by the best professional judgment of the ecologist managing the site. The goals, strategies and implementation actions remain the same. This updates also includes the natural area properties purchased since 2010. Methodology Update The methodology update evaluated additional functions and created a new weighting system. The original plan weighted functions associated with salmon habitat the highest while this update does not. Some of the updated functions were assigned weighted scores on a scale of 3 (high) to 1 (low) similar to the scoring used in the 2010 plan. A natural area was also given points for Terrestrial Ecology Enhancement Strategy (TEES) special status habitats and City of Portland At-Risk Species. The functions included are: (see attached memo for details): Streams: Perennial, non-perennial and within 100 feet of the natural area.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Proceedings
    Thanks to the following photographers Photo credits clockwise from upper left corner Peregrine falcon in flight–Mike Houck, Urban Greenspaces Institute OakQuest– Lori Hennings, Metro Parks & Nature Oregon iris at Cooper Mountain Nature Park– Lori Hennings, Metro Parks & Nature Western screech owl at Oaks Bottom Refuge– Scott Carpenter Conducting survey at Fernhill Wetland– Candace Larson Peregrine falcon– Mike Houck, Urban Greenspaces Institute Certificate of Appreciation awards–Mike Skuja, Tualatin Riverkeepers Green heron– Ray Hennings Boy smelling flower– Brooke Porter, Vancouver’s Water Resource Education Center Beaver eating himalayan blackberry–Mike Houck, Urban Greenspaces Institute Bee and sunflower– Mike Houck, Urban Greenspaces Institute 15TH ANNUAL URBAN ECOLOGY & CONSERVATION SYMPOSIUM Held at Smith Memorial Center Ballroom Portland State University Portland, Oregon, USA February 6, 2017 Organized by the Urban Ecosystem Research Consortium (UERC) Sponsored by TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THE UERC ....................................................................................... 1 ORGANIZING COMMITTEE AND PROGRAM SUPPORT .................................... 2 SYMPOSIUM AGENDA .................................................................................. 3 POSTER PRESENTATIONS .............................................................................. 5 LUNCHTIME OFFERINGS ............................................................................... 7 KEYNOTE SPEAKERS ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Ground-Water Flow System in the Portland Basin, Oregon and Washington
    Description of the Ground-Water Flow System in the Portland Basin, Oregon and Washington United States Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2470-A Prepared in cooperation with Oregon Water Resources Department, City of Portland Bureau of Water Works, and Intergovernmental Resources Center of Clark and Skamania Counties AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE US. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the current- year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Survey publica­ tions released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that may be listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" may be no longer available. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books and Maps Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Tech­ Books and maps of the U.S. Geological Survey are available niques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications over the counter at the following U.S. Geological Survey Earth Sci­ of general interest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single ence Information Centers (ESIC's), all of which are authorized copies of Preliminary Determination of Epicenters, and some mis­ agents of the Superintendent of Documents: cellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are obtain­ ANCHORAGE, Alaska Rm.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Stream Restoration on the Habitat Potential Of
    JOHNSON CREEK SALMONID POTENTIAL WITH FUTURE URBAN DEVELOPMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE AND RESTORATION: 2009 TO THE 2040S P REPARED FOR: City of Portland, Bureau of Environmental Services 1120 SW 5th Avenue, Room 1000 Portland, OR 97204‐3713 Contact: Kaitlin Lovell 503‐823‐7032 P REPARED BY: ICF International 317 SW Alder Street, Suite 800 Portland, OR 97204‐2583 Principal Investigator: Willis E. McConnaha, Ph.D. 503‐525‐6141 March 2011 Acknowledgments Many people contributed time, expertise, and information to the process of creating this report. Kaitlin Lovell, Chris Prescott, and Cindy Studebaker, from (or formerly from) the City of Portland’s Bureau of Environmental Services (BES), played leading roles in initiating and carrying out the project. Also from BES, Jennifer Antak, Chad Smith, and Ali Young provided information on the Johnson Creek watershed and the restoration projects in particular. The analysis and composition of the report were led by Dr. Willis McConnaha, John Runyon and Dr. Josh Caplan, from ICF International. Many other individuals from ICF assisted in technical aspects of the analysis, including Greg Blair, Bruce Watson, Rick Paquette, Dr. Lars Mobrand, and Dr. Jesse Schwartz. Ted Gresh of ICF helped manage the project while Deborah Bartley and Kristen Lundstrom provided editorial assistance, and Alice McKee and Tammy Stout assisted with data collection. Todd Alsbury, from the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife; Noah Jenkins, from the Johnson Creek Watershed Council; and Drs. Alan Yeakley and Heejun Chang, from Portland
    [Show full text]