DOCSLIB.ORG

A Review of the Planned Shipping Activity for the Baffinland Mary River Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Review of the Planned Shipping Activity for the Baffinland Mary River Project A Review of the Planned Shipping Activity for the Baffinland Mary River Project: Assessing the Hazards to Marine Mammals and Migratory Birds, and Identifying Gaps in Proposed Mitigation Measures By Michèle Megannety Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Marine Management at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia August 2011 © Michèle Megannety, 2011 i ii Dalhousie University, Marine Affairs Program Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada The undersigned hereby certify that they have read and recommend to Marine Affairs Program for acceptance a graduate research project titled “A Review of the Planned Shipping Activity for the Baffinland Mary River Project: Assessing the Hazards to Marine Mammals and Migratory Birds, and Identifying Gaps in Proposed Mitigation Measures” by Michèle Megannety in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Marine Management. Supervisor: Dr. Ron Pelot Signature: ___________________________ Dated: ____________________________ iii Dalhousie University Date: August 17, 2011 Author: Michèle Megannety School: Marine Affairs Program, Faculty of Management Degree: Master of Marine Management Convocation: October Year: 2011 ___________________________________ Signature of Author The author reserves other publication rights, and neither the graduate project nor extensive extracts from it may be printed or otherwise reproduced without the author‟s written permission. The author attests that permission has been obtained for the use of any copyrighted material appearing in the thesis (other than the brief excepts requiring only proper acknowledgement in scholarly writing), and that all such use is clearly acknowledged. iv This work is dedicated to all my friends and family who helped me along the way, but especially to my parents who have always supported and encouraged me in all my endeavours. Thank you for all your love and support. v TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................................... ix List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................................... xi Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................... xiv List of Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................................... xv Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................................ xviii 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Global Perspectives .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Resource Exploitation and Marine Environmental Degradation ................................. 1 1.1.2 Climate Change, Arctic Warming, and Melting Sea Ice ..................................................... 1 1.1.3 Implications for the International Shipping Industry ........................................................ 3 1.1.4 Vulnerable Arctic Marine Environment .................................................................................... 3 1.2 The Particular Issue .................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2.1 The Mary River Project ..................................................................................................................... 5 1.2.2 Project Highlights ................................................................................................................................ 5 1.3 Objectives ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.0 Methodology .................................................................................................................................................. 9 2.1 Literature Review ........................................................................................................................................ 9 2.2 Species Selection .......................................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Risk Analysis ................................................................................................................................................ 10 2.4 Risk Management ...................................................................................................................................... 12 3.0 Arctic Mineral Exploration and Extraction ................................................................................. 14 3.1 The Link Between Arctic Mining and Shipping ............................................................................. 14 3.1.1 Reliance on Marine Transportation .................................................................................................. 14 3.1.2 Bulk Transport ............................................................................................................................................ 14 3.2 Mining Within The Arctic States: The United States (US), Russia, Norway, and Greenland (Denmark) .............................................................................................................................. 15 3.3 Mining Within The Canadian Arctic ................................................................................................... 15 3.1.1 The Canadian Mining Industry ............................................................................................................ 15 3.3.2 Past and Present Projects in the Canadian North ...................................................................... 16 3.3.3 Opportunities for Nunavut .................................................................................................................... 18 vi 4.0 The Mary River Project ...................................................................................................................... 19 4.1 Background .................................................................................................................................................. 19 4.1.1 Ownership...................................................................................................................................................... 19 4.1.2 Current Status ............................................................................................................................................. 20 4.2 Project Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 21 4.3 Proposed Shipping Activity ................................................................................................................... 22 4.3.1 Steensby Port ............................................................................................................................................... 22 4.3.2 Icebreaking Ore-Carriers ....................................................................................................................... 23 4.3.3 Shipping Routes .......................................................................................................................................... 24 5.0 Potential Shipping Hazards To Wildlife ................................................................................... 31 5.1 Consequences of Increased Ship Traffic ........................................................................................... 31 5.2 Potential Threats ....................................................................................................................................... 31 5.2.1 Direct Threats .............................................................................................................................................. 31 5.2.1 Indirect Threats and Other Exclusions ............................................................................................ 32 5.3 Pollution ........................................................................................................................................................ 33 5.4 Disturbance .................................................................................................................................................. 34 5.4.1 Vessel Strikes ................................................................................................................................................ 34 5.4.2 Noise Disturbance ...................................................................................................................................... 34 5.4.3 Icebreakers and Habitat Disturbance .............................................................................................. 35 5.4.4 Light Disturbance ...................................................................................................................................... 36 6.0 Key Habitat Sites ..................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NSF/UNOLS Arctic Icebreaker Coordinating Committee (AICC) Meeting June 22, 2020
    NSF/UNOLS Arctic Icebreaker Coordinating Committee (AICC) Meeting June 22, 2020 Canadian NW Passage: Research Outreach Background & Recommendations Phil McGillivary, USCG PACAREA & Icebreaker Science Liaison email: [email protected] Outline: • Principal Towns & Research Centers in Inuit Nunangat • Research Coordination with Inuit, Nunavut: Recommendations, POCs, and prior CG outreach • Downlink locations planned by Quintillion for fiber optic/Internet along NWP • Marine Protected areas along Canadian NW Passage Distribution of Communities & Research Stations along NWP Grise Fjord Sachs Harbor Resolute Pond Inlet Tuktoyaktuk Arctic Bay Clyde River Holman Paulatuk Igloolik Cambridge Bay Gjoa Haven Iqaluit Research Coordination: Canadian National Recommendations • Consult the Canadian National Inuit Strategy on Research (Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami): https://www.itk.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/National-Inuit-Strategy-on-Research.pdf • This outlines the different regions for research licenses, which may have different regulations/requirements. The regions are: • Inuvialuit Settlement Region (ISR): the westernmost area, with licenses granted by the Aurora Research Institute (ARI) • Nunavut, central area, with licenses granted by the Nunavut Research Institute (NRI) • Nunavik, easternmost area, with licenses granted by the Nunavik Research Centre (or others depending on type of research, eg human health is another group • Appendix A in this document includes a list of all Research Stations in these areas (shown in previous slide •
    [Show full text]
  • Polar Bears from Space: Assessing Satellite Imagery As a Tool to Track Arctic Wildlife
    Polar Bears from Space: Assessing Satellite Imagery as a Tool to Track Arctic Wildlife Seth Stapleton1*¤a, Michelle LaRue3, Nicolas Lecomte4¤b, Stephen Atkinson4, David Garshelis2,5, Claire Porter3, Todd Atwood1 1 United States Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, Anchorage, Alaska, United States of America, 2 Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America, 3 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America, 4 Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut, Igloolik, Nunavut, Canada, 5 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Grand Rapids, Minnesota, United States of America Abstract Development of efficient techniques for monitoring wildlife is a priority in the Arctic, where the impacts of climate change are acute and remoteness and logistical constraints hinder access. We evaluated high resolution satellite imagery as a tool to track the distribution and abundance of polar bears. We examined satellite images of a small island in Foxe Basin, Canada, occupied by a high density of bears during the summer ice-free season. Bears were distinguished from other light-colored spots by comparing images collected on different dates. A sample of ground-truthed points demonstrated that we accurately classified bears. Independent observers reviewed images and a population estimate was obtained using mark– recapture models. This estimate (N^ : 94; 95% Confidence Interval: 92–105) was remarkably similar to an abundance estimate derived from a line transect aerial survey conducted a few days earlier (N^ : 102; 95% CI: 69–152). Our findings suggest that satellite imagery is a promising tool for monitoring polar bears on land, with implications for use with other Arctic wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • Transits of the Northwest Passage to End of the 2020 Navigation Season Atlantic Ocean ↔ Arctic Ocean ↔ Pacific Ocean
    TRANSITS OF THE NORTHWEST PASSAGE TO END OF THE 2020 NAVIGATION SEASON ATLANTIC OCEAN ↔ ARCTIC OCEAN ↔ PACIFIC OCEAN R. K. Headland and colleagues 7 April 2021 Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 1ER. <[email protected]> The earliest traverse of the Northwest Passage was completed in 1853 starting in the Pacific Ocean to reach the Atlantic Oceam, but used sledges over the sea ice of the central part of Parry Channel. Subsequently the following 319 complete maritime transits of the Northwest Passage have been made to the end of the 2020 navigation season, before winter began and the passage froze. These transits proceed to or from the Atlantic Ocean (Labrador Sea) in or out of the eastern approaches to the Canadian Arctic archipelago (Lancaster Sound or Foxe Basin) then the western approaches (McClure Strait or Amundsen Gulf), across the Beaufort Sea and Chukchi Sea of the Arctic Ocean, through the Bering Strait, from or to the Bering Sea of the Pacific Ocean. The Arctic Circle is crossed near the beginning and the end of all transits except those to or from the central or northern coast of west Greenland. The routes and directions are indicated. Details of submarine transits are not included because only two have been reported (1960 USS Sea Dragon, Capt. George Peabody Steele, westbound on route 1 and 1962 USS Skate, Capt. Joseph Lawrence Skoog, eastbound on route 1). Seven routes have been used for transits of the Northwest Passage with some minor variations (for example through Pond Inlet and Navy Board Inlet) and two composite courses in summers when ice was minimal (marked ‘cp’).
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Goose Joint Venture STRATEGIC PLAN 2008 – 2012
    Arctic Goose Joint Venture STRATEGIC PLAN 2008 – 2012 Arctic Goose Joint Venture STRATEGIC PLAN 2008 – 2012 Cover Photos (clockwise from top left): Doug Steinke, Doug Steinke, John Conkin, Jeff Coats, Tim Moser, Tim Moser, Doug Steinke Arctic Goose Joint Venture Technical Committee. 2008. Arctic Goose Joint Venture Strategic Plan: 2008 - 2012. Unpubl. Rept. [c/o AGJV Coordination Office, CWS, Edmonton, Alberta]. 112pp. Strategic Plan 2008 – 2012 Table of Contents INtroductioN ................................................................................................................ 7 ACCOMPLISHMENts AND FUTURE CHALLENGES .................................................... 9 Past Accomplishments ....................................................................................................... 9 Banding ...................................................................................................................... 9 Surveys ..................................................................................................................... 10 Research ................................................................................................................... 10 Future Challenges ........................................................................................................... 11 INformatioN NEEDS AND Strategies to ADDRESS THEM ............................ 12 Definitions of Information Needs.................................................................................... 12 Strategies for Meeting the Information
    [Show full text]
  • PHYSIOGRAPHY 45 1.6 Areas of Major Islands, by Region 1.7
    PHYSIOGRAPHY 45 1.6 Areas of major islands, by region Region and island Area Region and island Area sq miles sq miles Baffin Island 195,928 HUDSON BAY AND HUDSON STRAIT Southampton 15,913 QUEEN ELIZABETH ISLANDS Coats 2,123 Ellesmere 75,767 Mansel 1,228 Devon 21,331 Akimiski 1,159 Axel Heiberg 16,671 Flaherty 612 Melville 16,274 Nottingham 530 Bathurst 6,194 Resolution 392 Prince Patrick 6,119 Vansittart 385 Ellef Ringnes 4,361 Akpatok 349 Cornwallis 2,701 Salisbury 311 Amund Ringnes 2,029 Big 310 Mackenzie King 1,949 White 305 Borden 1,079 Loks Land 162 Cornwall 872 Eglinton 595 PACIFIC COAST Graham 532 Lougheed 505 Vancouver 12,079 Byam Martin 444 Graham 2,456 lie Vanier 435 Moresby 1,007 Cameron 409 Princess Royal 869 Meighen 369 Pitt 531 Brock 295 Banks 382 King Christian 249 King 312 North Kent 228 Porcher 201 Emerald 212 Nootka 197 Alexander 187 Aristazabal 162 Massey 167 Gilford 148 Little Cornwallis 159 Hawkesbury 141 Hunter 140 ARCTIC ISLANDS SOUTH OF Calvert 127 QUEEN ELIZABETH ISLANDS Texada 116 Victoria 83,896 Swindle 110 Banks 27,038 McCauley 106 Prince of Wales 12,872 Louise 106 Somerset 9,570 Quadra 104 King William 5,062 Bylot 4,273 ATLANTIC COAST Prince Charles 3,676 1,723 Newfoundland and Labrador Stefansson 42,031 Richards 836 Newfoundland (main island) 664 South Aulatsivik 176 Air Force Killinek 104 Wales 439 421 Fogo 98 Rowley Random 96 Russell 363 355 New World 73 Jens Munk Tunungayualok 72 Langley and Ellice 301 266 West Okak 69 Bray Paul 69 Foley 246 Royal Geographical Society Islands 235 Gulf of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Walrus Odobenus Rosmarus Rosmarus
    COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on the Atlantic Walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2006 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2006. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. ix + 65 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Previous reports: COSEWIC 2000. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus (Northwest Atlantic Population and Eastern Arctic Population) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 23 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Richard, P. 1987. COSEWIC status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus (Northwest Atlantic Population and Eastern Arctic Population) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-23 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge D.B. Stewart for writing the status report on the Atlantic Walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada, overseen and edited by Andrew Trites, Co-chair, COSEWIC Marine Mammals Species Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Évaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la situation du morse de l'Atlantique (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) au Canada – Mise à jour.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Adaptation in the Arctic Area: Shipping and Port Infrastructures
    Ad Hoc Expert Meeting on Climate Change Adaptation for International Transport: Preparing for the Future 16 to 17 April 2019 Climate Adaptation in the Arctic Area: Shipping and Port Infrastructures Presentation by Adolf Ng Professor of Transportation and Supply Chain Management University of Manitoba This expert paper is reproduced by the UNCTAD secretariat in the form and language in which it has been received. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the UNCTAD. Climate Adaptation in the Adolf K.Y. Ng Asper School of Business, St. Arctic Area: Shipping and Port John’s College, University of Infrastructures Manitoba, Canada 1 2 3 4 5 6 INTRODUCTION THE GOOD AND BAD POTENTIAL SOCIO-ECONOMIC CRITICAL POLICY SOLUTIONS MODEL FOR THE INFRASTRUCTURES RECOMMENDATIONS ARCTIC (SEMA) THE UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA’S ARCTIC ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT TEAM: Prof. Adolf K.Y. Ng, Dr. Mawuli Afenyo, Dr. Changmin Jiang, Mr. Yufeng Lin Contact: [email protected] The GENICE Project (genice.ca) Special thanks to Mr. Al Phillips (Al Phillips & Associates) Outline 1 What is the Arctic? • Regions around the north pole • Second largest area by size (13,985,000 km²) • Area above the Arctic circle (66° 34’ N) • Any area in high latitudes where average daily temperature does not rise above 10 degree Picture courtesy: https://nsidc.org/sites/nsidc.org/files/images//arctic_map.gif • Second largest Arctic country • 200,000 Canadians live in the Arctic • New Arctic Framework under development • comprehensive Arctic infrastructure
    [Show full text]
  • Military Monitoring
    Page 1 http://www.carmachicago.com MilAir CARMA Chicago Area Radio Monitoring Association CARMA Military Monitoring An F-16C from the Illinois Air National Guard’s 183rd Tactical Fighter Wing lands at its home base - Abraham Lincoln Memorial airport in Springfield during an Air Rendezvous air show. The state capital building is on the horizon. Command post for the unit was on 138.200 (AM) VHF and 272.175 (AM) UHF. V1.1 Send updates to: [email protected] November 2008 Page 2 http://www.carmachicago.com MilAir CARMA Chicago Area Radio Monitoring Association CARMA V1.1 Send updates to: [email protected] November 2008 Page 3 http://www.carmachicago.com MilAir CARMA Chicago Area Radio Monitoring Association CARMA Mid-air refuelling tracks and anchor areas: Track Primary Secondary Entry / Exit control via ARTCC AR16 343.500 319.700 353.500 343.700 AR17 276.500 320.900 353.700 338.200 AR19 295.400 320.900 360.650 322.500 AR24 295.400 320.900 338.200 353.700 AR105 238.900 320.900 269.000 AR106H 295.800 320.900 269.400 306.200 AR106L 305.500 320.900 269.400 306.200 AR107 324.600 282.700 353.600 AR109H 343.500 320.900 327.100 AR109L 327.600 320.900 327.100 AR110 327.600 319.700 277.400 346.400 319.000 AR111 348.900 319.700 122.200 124.200 132.375 124.275 257.600 288.350 354.150 AR116 366.300 260.200 269.400 343.700 363.200 AR206H 348.900 282.700 323.000 354.100 AR206L 235.100 282.700 323.000 307.800 AR217 283.900 282.700 298.950 294.650 AR218 352.600 282.700 299.200 379.200 AR219 366.300 282.700 363.100 288.300 AR220 352.600 282.700
    [Show full text]
  • RECLAMATION PILOT STUDY Mary River Mine Project
    RECLAMATION PILOT STUDY Mary River Mine Project Revegetaon Survey & Preliminary Reclamaon Trial REV.1 Prepared For Baffinland Iron Mines Corporaon 300 - 2275 Upper Middle Road East Oakville, ON L6H 0C3 Prepared By EDI Environmental Dynamics Inc. 220 - 736, 8 Ave. Southwest Calgary, AB T2P 1H4 EDI Contact Patrick Audet, PhD, RPBio Mike Seerington, MSc, RPBio EDI Project 19Y0005:2008 March 2020 Down to Earth Biology This page is intentionally blank. RECLAMATION PILOT STUDY Mary River Mine Project | Revegetation Survey & Preliminary Reclamation Trial TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 POST-DISTURBANCE REVEGETATION SURVEY............................................................................................ 2 2.1 SURVEY DESIGN ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 METHODS & ANALYSES ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 2.3 RESULTS SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3.1 KM52 — 1-Year Post-Disturbance ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CNGO NU Summary-Of-Activities
    SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES 2015 © 2015 by Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office. All rights reserved. Electronic edition published 2015. This publication is also available, free of charge, as colour digital files in Adobe Acrobat® PDF format from the Canada- Nunavut Geoscience Office website: www.cngo.ca/ Every reasonable effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this report, but Natural Resources Canada does not assume any liability for errors that may occur. Source references are included in the report and users should verify critical information. When using information from this publication in other publications or presentations, due acknowledgment should be given to Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office. The recommended reference is included on the title page of each paper. The com- plete volume should be referenced as follows: Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office (2015): Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office Summary of Activities 2015; Canada- Nunavut Geoscience Office, 208 p. ISSN 2291-1235 Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office Summary of Activities (Print) ISSN 2291-1243 Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office Summary of Activities (Online) Front cover photo: Sean Noble overlooking a glacially eroded valley, standing among middle Paleoproterozoic age psam- mitic metasedimentary rocks, nine kilometres west of Chidliak Bay, southern Baffin Island. Photo by Dustin Liikane, Carleton University. Back cover photo: Iqaluit International Airport under rehabilitation and expansion; the Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Of- fice, Geological Survey of Canada (Natural Resources Canada), Centre d’études nordiques (Université Laval) and Trans- port Canada contributed to a better understanding of permafrost conditions to support the planned repairs and adapt the in- frastructure to new climatic conditions. Photo by Tommy Tremblay, Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 4, 1951
    Annual General Meeting of the Arctic Circle l Amendment to the Constitution 2 Royal Canadian Army Service Corps in northern trials and operations. By Major J.M. Berry .3 Geographical and archaeological investigations on Southampton Island, 1950. By J.B. Bird 10 Eskimo Handicrafts 12 The French Antarctic Expedition 12 Eastern Arctic Mailing List 13 Membership of The Arctic Circ1e 16 Back numbers of the Circu1ar 17 Editorial Note 17 Twenty-sixth Meeting of the Arctic Circle 18 Voyage round Cornwallis Island. By Trevor Harwood 18 The discovery of Prince Charles Island 29 The Arctic and the Specialist Navigation Course. By FIL G.J. Sweanor .30 Protection of wildlife in northeast Greenland 32 Hudsonts Bay Company Archives .3.3 ArcticMail 3.3 Membership of The Arctic Circle .35 Back numbers of the Circular 36 Editorial Note .36 Twenty-seventh Meeting of the Arctic Circle 37 Botanical Surveys in Central and Northern Manitoba. By H.J. Scoggan 37 Tuberculosis Survey: James and Hudson bays, 1950 45 Arctic Dog Disease 47 Reports of Arctic Dog Disease 48 The Varying Lemming captive in Ottawa. By T.H. Manning 50 Exercise Mukluk 50 Plant life in the Arctic 50 Membership of The Arctic Circle 51 Back numbers of the Circular 51 Editorial Note 51 APRIL-MAY 1951 Twenty-eighth Meeting of the Arctic Circle 52 Twenty-ninth Meeting of the Arctic Circle 52 Caribou in Greenland. By A.E. Porsild 52 Gravity survey of the Barnes Ice Cap. By C.A. Littlewood 58 Spring supply operations for the northern weather stations 61 Antarctic party's accident 61 Microfilm records of M'Clintock expeditions 62 Exercise Firestep 63 Hudson Bay Route Association 63 "Alaska's Health" 63 Membership of The Arctic Circle 63 Back numbers of the Circular 64 Editorial Note 64 Hydrographic survey operations of the ".Algerine" in 1950.
    [Show full text]
  • Grade 5 Module 3B, Unit 3, Lesson 3
    Grade 5: Module 3B: Unit 3: Lesson 3 Conducting Research: Analyzing Expert Texts about the Mary River Project This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Exempt third-party content is indicated by the footer: © (name of copyright holder). Used by permission and not subject to Creative Commons license. GRADE 5: MODULE 3B: UNIT 3: LESSON 3 Conducting Research: Analyzing Expert Texts about the Mary River Project Long-Term Targets Addressed (Based on NYSP12 ELA CCLS) I can analyze multiple accounts of the same topic, noting important similarities and differences in the point of view they represent. (RI.5.6) I can explain how the author uses reasons and evidence to support particular points in a text. (RI.5.8) I can draw evidence from informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. (W.5.9b) I can determine the meaning of unknown words and phrases, choosing flexibly from a range of strategies. (L.5.4) Supporting Learning Targets Ongoing Assessment • I can analyze the meaning of key words and phrases, using a variety of strategies. • Vocabulary terms defined on index cards and Frayer • I can support my research, analysis, and reflection on the Mary River project by drawing upon evidence Models from expert texts. • Point of View Graphic Organizer: Expert Texts • I can explain the reasons and evidence given to support two different points of view about the Mary River project on Baffin Island. Copyright © 2013 by Expeditionary Learning, New York, NY. All Rights Reserved. NYS Common Core ELA Curriculum • G5:M3B:U3:L3 • June 2014 • 1 GRADE 5: MODULE 3B: UNIT 3: LESSON 3 Conducting Research: Analyzing Expert Texts about the Mary River Project Agenda Teaching Notes 1.
    [Show full text]