2009 Redistribution of Tasmania Into Electoral Divisions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2009 Redistribution of Tasmania Into Electoral Divisions Australian Electoral Commission 2009 Redistribution of Tasmania into Electoral Divisions Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 Section 75 © Commonwealth of Australia 2009 ISBN 978-1-921427-09-1 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Attorney-General’s Department, Robert Garran Offi ces, National Circuit, Canberra, ACT 2600 or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca Published by the Australian Electoral Commission Printed by Union Offset Printers, Fyshwick, ACT Contents Part 1 Redistribution of Tasmania into Electoral Divisions 1.1 Determination made by the augmented Electoral 2 Commission for Tasmania. 1.2 Reasons for the determination made by the augmented 3 Electoral Commission for Tasmania. 1.3 Statistical summary. 13 1.4 Description of the method used to calculate the areas of 14 electoral divisions. 1.5 General description of each electoral division. 15 Appendix A Composition of the augmented Electoral Commission for 21 Tasmania and the Redistribution Committee for Tasmania. Appendix B List of objections lodged with the Australian Electoral 22 Commission pursuant to section 69(1) of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. Appendix C List of comments on objections lodged with the Australian 23 Electoral Commission pursuant to section 69(3) of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. Appendix D List of persons who appeared at the public inquiry into 24 objections held by the augmented Electoral Commission for Tasmania in Hobart on 8 October 2008. Appendix E List of persons who appeared at the public inquiry into 25 objections held by the augmented Electoral Commission for Tasmania in Devonport on 27 October 2008. Appendix F Guidelines for the naming of electoral divisions. 26 Appendix G Redistribution timetable. 28 Part 2 Enclosures Redistribution statistics; public suggestions to the CD Redistribution Committee; comments on public suggestions; report – 2008 Proposed Redistribution of Tasmania into Electoral Divisions; public objections to the proposed redistribution; comments on public objections to the proposed redistribution; transcripts of the inquiries into public objections; PDF maps of electoral divisions. Composite map showing the boundaries of the electoral Paper map divisions for Tasmania as determined by the augmented (1 sheet) Electoral Commission for Tasmania. PART 1 Redistribution of Tasmania into Electoral Divisions 16 February 2009 Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 Sections 73 and 74 1.1 DETERMINATION MADE BY THE AUGMENTED ELECTORAL COMMISSION FOR TASMANIA Pursuant to section 73 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918, the augmented Electoral Commission for Tasmania hereby determines that the names and boundaries of the electoral divisions into which Tasmania is to be distributed are as shown on the maps certifi ed by the members of the augmented Electoral Commission for Tasmania and lodged in fi le number 08/1150 at the National Offi ce of the Australian Electoral Commission in Canberra. These maps are numbered in the following sequence: TAS01/2009 Bass TAS02/2009 Braddon TAS03/2009 Denison TAS04/2009 Franklin TAS05/2009 Lyons The augmented Electoral Commission for Tasmania reached this determination on the basis that it determined the names and boundaries of the electoral divisions in Tasmania should be as proposed by the Redistribution Committee for Tasmania in its report published on 22 August 2008, subject to the following changes: (i) the Kentish local government area (LGA) shall be located in the Division of Lyons; (ii) the western part of the Latrobe LGA shall be located in the Division of Braddon in the manner shown on the relevant maps; (iii) the whole of the Clarence LGA shall be located in the Division of Franklin; and (iv) the whole of the locality of Gagebrook shall be located in the Division of Lyons. J C S Burchett QC Chairperson augmented Electoral Commission for Tasmania 2 1.2 REASONS FOR THE DETERMINATION MADE BY THE AUGMENTED ELECTORAL COMMISSION FOR TASMANIA Representation of Tasmania in the House of Representatives 1. On 17 November 2005 the Electoral Commissioner made a determination of State and Territory entitlements to representation under section 48(1) of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (the Electoral Act). Under the determination, and by virtue of section 24 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia, Tasmania is entitled to fi ve members of the House of Representatives. Direction for a redistribution of Tasmanian electoral divisions 2. Section 59(1) of the Electoral Act provides that a redistribution shall commence whenever the Australian Electoral Commission (the Electoral Commission) so directs by notice published in the Commonwealth Government Gazette (the Gazette). 3. Section 59(2) of the Electoral Act provides that a direction to commence a redistribution shall be made if a period of seven years after the day on which the State or Territory was last distributed into electoral divisions has expired. If that expiry occurs within one year before the date of expiry of a House of Representatives by effl uxion of time, section 59(4) provides that the direction shall be made within 30 days after the day of the fi rst meeting of the next following House of Representatives. 4. The last distribution of Tasmania into electoral divisions was determined under section 73(1) of the Electoral Act on 11 February 2000. The Electoral Commission directed on 13 February 2008, by notice published in the Gazette, that a redistribution was to commence in Tasmania. 5. At the end of 13 February 2008, the day determined by the Electoral Commission for the redistribution to begin, the number of electors enrolled in Tasmania was 352 203. 6. Redistribution statistics which include the electoral enrolment fi gures as at 13 February 2008 were made available on the Australian Electoral Commission website. In addition, copies were available upon request at the Hobart offi ce of the Australian Electoral Commission. The statistics were given at the following levels: • Census Collection District (CCD) • Statistical Local Area (SLA) • Electoral Division • State. 3 Quota 7. Under section 65(2) of the Electoral Act, the Electoral Commissioner determined that the quota of electors for Tasmania was 70 441 (352 203 divided by fi ve members). The permitted range of the margin of allowance of 10% below and above the quota was 63 397 to 77 485 accordingly (Table 1). The Electoral Act does not permit any greater variation from the quota to be provided for in a redistribution. Appointment of the Redistribution Committee for Tasmania 8. In accordance with section 60 of the Electoral Act, the Electoral Commission appointed the Redistribution Committee for Tasmania on 9 April 2008. The Redistribution Committee (the Committee) comprised the following members: Electoral Commissioner Mr Ian Campbell Australian Electoral Offi cer for Tasmania Ms Marie Neilson Surveyor-General, Tasmania Mr Peter Murphy Auditor-General, Tasmania Mr Mike Blake Redistribution Committee’s proposed redistribution 9. All preconditions having been met, the Committee made a proposed redistribution of Tasmania under section 66 of the Electoral Act, stating its reasons in writing; caused the notice required by section 68(1)(c) of the Electoral Act to be published in the Gazette on 22 August 2008; and took the other steps required by section 68. Projected enrolment 10. In making its proposed redistribution, the Redistribution Committee was required by section 66(3) of the Electoral Act, as far as practicable, to endeavour to ensure that, if a redistribution proceeded in accordance with its proposal, the number of electors enrolled in each electoral division in Tasmania would not, at the projection time determined under section 63A, be less than 96.5% or more than 103.5% of the average divisional enrolment of the State at that time. Correspondingly, the augmented Electoral Commission is required by section 73(4), in making its determination by notice published in the Gazette under section 73(1), as far as practicable, to endeavour to ensure that the number of electors enrolled in each electoral division in Tasmania will not, at the projection time determined under section 63A, fall outside the same parameters. Section 63A, both for the purposes of the Redistribution Committee and for the purposes of the augmented Electoral Commission, fi xes the projection time by reference to the time of making the determination which the augmented Electoral Commission is to make by notice published in the Gazette, that is to say, the date of gazettal; the projection time is the end of the period of 3 years and 6 months after that date. 4 11. By virtue of these provisions, it is necessary for the projection time (commonly referred to as “the projection date”) to be fi xed early in the redistribution procedures, so that the appropriate calculations may be made, and when notices are given under section 64, persons wishing to make suggestions or comments may be able to take account of projected enrolments at the relevant time. For the redistribution of Tasmania, the Redistribution Committee and the augmented Commission have taken the projection time as being 15 August 2012 when, it has been calculated, the projected average divisional enrolment of Tasmania will be 73 007, yielding a permissible range for projected divisional enrolments of 70 452 to 75 562 (Table 1). But the augmented Commission has decided to make its determination, by notice published in the Gazette, on 16 February 2009, and the projection time, being the end of the period of 3 years and 6 months after the time of making the determination, is therefore 16 August 2012, not 15 August 2012. Nor could the augmented Commission have brought its determination forward to 15 February 2009, since that was a Sunday, when the Gazette is not published.
Recommended publications
  • West Coast Land Use Planning Strategy
    " " " " " " " " " !"#$%&'(#$%&')*&+,%,(*-%)#"%.,(**+*/%#$0($"/1%" " #".$"23"0%4567% " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Prepared for West Coast Council" " By:" ႛ Integrated Planning Solutions; ႛ Essential Economics; and ႛ Ratio Consultants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
    [Show full text]
  • Around the Bend
    Cultural Studies Review volume 18 number 1 March 2012 http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/csrj/index pp. 86–106 Emily Bullock 2012 Around the Bend The Curious Power of the Hills around Queenstown, Tasmania EMILY BULLOCK UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA Approaching the town of Queenstown you can’t help but be taken aback by the sight of the barren hillsides, hauntingly bare yet strangely beautiful. This lunar landscape has a majestic, captivating quality. In December 1994 after 101 years of continuous mining—A major achievement for a mining company—the Mount Lyell Mining and Railway Company called it a day and closed the operation thus putting Queenstown under threat of becoming a ghost town. Now, with the mine under the ownership of Copper Mines of Tasmania, the town and the mine are once again thriving. Although Queenstown is primarily a mining town, it is also a very popular tourist destination offering visitors unique experiences. So, head for the hills and discover Queenstown—a unique piece of ‘Space’ on earth.1 In his discussion of the labour of the negative in Defacement: Public Secrecy and the Labour of the Negative, Michael Taussig opens out into a critique of criticism. ISSN 1837-8692 Criticism, says Taussig, is in some way a defacement, a tearing away at an object that ends up working its magic on the critic and forging a ‘curious complicity’ between object and critic.2 Taussig opens up a critical space in which to think with the object of analysis, cutting through transcendental critique, as a critical defacement, which, in the very act of cutting, produces negative energy: a ‘contagious, proliferating, voided force’ in which the small perversities of ‘laughter, bottom-spanking, eroticism, violence, and dismemberment exist simultaneously in violent silence’.3 This complicity in thinking might be charged by critical methodologies which engage in, and think through, peripatetic movements.
    [Show full text]
  • West Coast Council, Zeehan Landfill Wetlands, Extension
    Environmental Assessment Report Zeehan Landfill Wetland Zeehan Waste Depot, Zeehan West Coast Council July 2021 Environmental Assessment Report – West Coast Council – Zeehan Landfill Wetland, Zeehan Waste Depot, Zeehan 1 Environmental Assessment Report Proponent West Coast Council Proposal Zeehan Landfill Wetland Location Zeehan Waste Depot, 3990 Henty Road, Zeehan Tasmania 7467 NELMS no. PCE 10460 Permit Application No. 2021/13 West Coast Council Electronic Folder No. EN-EM-EV-DE 261742-001 Document No. D21-26020 Class of Assessment 2A Assessment Process Milestones 25 May 2020 Notice of Intent lodged 01 July 2020 Guidelines Issued 02 March 2021 Permit Application submitted to Council 03 March 2021 Application received by the Board 13 March 2021 Start of public consultation period 27 March 2021 End of public consultation period 6 May 2021 Date draft conditions issued to proponent 7 May 2021 Statutory period for assessment ends, extension agreed until 21 May 2021 21 May 2021 Proponent submits amended layout to EPA with amended activity area and prepares to submit Permit Application. 12 June 2021 Start of public consultation period 26 June 2021 End of public consultation period 6 May 2021 Conditions forwarded to proponent for comment Environmental Assessment Report – West Coast Council – Zeehan Landfill Wetland, Zeehan Waste Depot, Zeehan 2 Acronyms 7Q10 Lowest 7 day average flow in a 10 year period AMD Acid and Metalliferous Drainage AMDMP Acid and Metalliferous Drainage Management Plan AMT Accepted Modern Technology ANZECC Guidelines Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality 2000 (co published by the Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council).
    [Show full text]
  • Second Reading Speech
    DRAFT SECOND READING SPEECH HON WILL HODGMAN MP Constitution Amendment (House of Assembly Electoral Boundaries) Bill 2018 *check Hansard for delivery* I move – That the Constitution Amendment (House of Assembly Electoral Boundaries) Bill 2018 now be read for the second time. The Commonwealth recently reviewed the House of Representatives boundaries in Tasmania. This review was part of an independent redistribution of federal electoral boundaries, required under the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. The previous redistribution of the federal electoral boundaries in Tasmania was completed in 2009. The redistribution of electoral boundaries usually reflects population changes to ensure an even and fair allocation of voters among the electorates. Having even electorates is an important element of retaining ‘fairness’ in our voting system and indeed our democracy. On 14 November 2017, the Commonwealth augmented Electoral Commission for Tasmania announced new boundaries for the federal electorates in Tasmania. The augmented Commission consisted of the three members of the Australian Electoral Commission, the Australian Electoral Officer for Tasmania, Mr David Molnar, the Surveyor-General of Tasmania, Mr Michael Giudici, and the Auditor-General of Tasmania, Mr Rod Whitehead. The augmented Commission also announced that the division of ‘Denison’ be renamed to the division of ‘Clark’. This name change recognises the role of Andrew Inglis Clark in the creation of the Australian Federation. The new name and boundary changes will apply from the next federal election. However, these Commonwealth changes do not automatically apply as State electoral boundaries in Tasmania. In the past, the Tasmanian Parliament has chosen to adopt the Commonwealth House of Representatives boundaries for the purposes of House of Assembly divisions by amending the Constitution Act 1934 to ensure they coincide.
    [Show full text]
  • SENATE Official Hansard
    COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SENATE Official Hansard TUESDAY, 22 JUNE 1999 THIRTY-NINTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION—THIRD PERIOD BY AUTHORITY OF THE SENATE CANBERRA CONTENTS TUESDAY, 22 JUNE Telecommunications (Consumer Protection and Service Standards) Bill 1998— Suspension of Standing Orders ............................ 5893 Business— Consideration of Legislation ............................. 5898 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Bill 1998 [1999]— Second Reading ...................................... 5898 Questions Without Notice— Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Legislation . 5909 Telstra Sale: Social Bonus ............................... 5911 Ministerial Code of Conduct ............................. 5913 Telstra: Further Sale ................................... 5913 Member for Leichhardt: Disclosure of Interests ................ 5914 Cross-vesting: High Court Decision ........................ 5915 Member for Leichhardt: East Trinity Development .............. 5916 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Legislation . 5917 Member for Leichhardt: East Trinity Development .............. 5918 Albury-Wodonga Freeway ............................... 5918 Member for Leichhardt: East Trinity Development .............. 5920 Skase, Mr Christopher: Assets ............................ 5920 Goods and Services Tax: Public Housing .................... 5921 Telstra Sale: Environment ............................... 5922 Answers to Questions Without Notice— Member for Leichhardt: Disclosure
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Decisions. Strong Partnerships. Stronger Communities
    2025 smart decisions. strong partnerships. stronger communities. With Funding support from Australian Government through Primary Health 2 WEST COAST COMMUNITY PLAN 2025 contents the plan 03 Our Future 05 Our Place Our Lifestyle 11 Our Community Plan 20 Future Directions 23 What We Said our plan for action Our People Our Community 29 Our Economy 32 Our Infrastructure 34 Our Environment 36 Our Partnerships Our Leadership 37 3 WEST COAST COMMUNITY PLAN 2025 from the Mayor & General Manager our future t is with great pride that we present the We look forward to continuing these West Coast Community Plan 2025, a valued partnerships and connections, as the vision for the West Coast which will guide community moves forward with a whole-of- the Region over the next 10 years and community response to the vision provided Ibeyond. for the West Coast. West Coast’s Community Plan provides an The community embraced the opportunity opportunity to strategically plan a future that to be part of a vision for the Region, and the community, Council, government, non- that is reflected through the engagement government organisations, businesses and process and reflected in the Plan. West stakeholders can work towards together. Coast Council would like to sincerely thank the community for their enthusiasm The Community Plan has been developed and responsiveness to the West Coast by the West Coast community, for the Community Plan engagement process. community. More than 2,000 people were The visions, suggestions, and comments involved in some way in the development provided by the community have resulted of this plan, and it is the culmination of the in the development of the first West Coast ideas, vision, and concerns of our community.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Margaret Power Scheme a Conservation Management Plan
    Lake Margaret Power Scheme A Conservation Management Plan Volume 1 March 2006 Paul Davies Pty Ltd Architects Heritage Consultants Lake Margaret Power Scheme Paul Davies Pty Ltd Conservation Management Plan March 2006 Lake Margaret Power Scheme Paul Davies Pty Ltd Conservation Management Plan March 2006 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 How to Use the Plan....................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Limitations ...................................................................................... 2 1.1.3 Authors ........................................................................................... 2 1.1.4 Acknowledgments .......................................................................... 2 1.1.5 Identification of the Place ............................................................... 3 2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND........................................................................... 6 2.1 Preface....................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Summary History........................................................................................ 6 2.3 Major Stages of Development of the site ................................................... 7 2.4 Development of the Power Station Building............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reimagining the Visitor Experience of Tasmania's Wilderness World
    Reimagining the Visitor Experience of Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area Ecotourism Investment Profile Reimagining the Visitor Experience of Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area: Ecotourism Investment Profile This report was commissioned by Tourism Industry Council Tasmania and the Cradle Coast Authority, in partnership with the Tasmanian Government through Tourism Tasmania and the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service. This report is co-funded by the Australian Government under the Tourism Industry Regional Development Fund Grants Programme. This report has been prepared by EC3 Global, TRC Tourism and Tourism Industry Council Tasmania. Date prepared: June 2014 Design by Halibut Creative Collective. Disclaimer The information and recommendations provided in this report are made on the basis of information available at the time of preparation. While all care has been taken to check and validate material presented in this report, independent research should be undertaken before any action or decision is taken on the basis of material contained in this report. This report does not seek to provide any assurance of project viability and EC3 Global, TRC Tourism and Tourism Industry Council Tasmania accept no liability for decisions made or the information provided in this report. Cover photo: Huon Pine Walk Corinna The Tarkine - Rob Burnett & Tourism Tasmania Contents Background...............................................................2 Reimagining the Visitor Experience of the TWWHA .................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Council Email Address Web Site Mayor General Manager
    COUNCIL EMAIL ADDRESS WEB SITE MAYOR GENERAL MANAGER Break O'Day Council [email protected] http://www.bodc.tas.gov.au Mayor Mick Tucker Mr John Brown Brighton Council [email protected] http://www.brighton.tas.gov.au Mayor Tony Foster Mr James Dryburgh Burnie City Council [email protected] http://www.burnie.net Mayor Steve Kons Mr Andrew Wardlaw Central Coast Council [email protected] http://www.centcoast.tas.gov.au Mayor Jan Bonde Ms Sandra Ayton Central Highlands Council [email protected] http://www.centralhighlands.tas.gov.au Mayor Loueen Triffitt Ms Lyn Eyles Circular Head Council [email protected] http://www.circularhead.tas.gov.au Mayor Daryl Quilliam Mr Scott Riley Clarence, City Of [email protected] http://www.ccc.tas.gov.au Mayor Doug Chipman Mr Ian Nelson Derwent Valley Council [email protected] http://www.derwentvalley.tas.gov.au Mayor Ben Shaw Mr Dean Griggs Devonport City Council [email protected] http://www.devonport.tas.gov.au Mayor Annette Rockliff Mr Matthew Atkins Dorset Council [email protected] http://www.dorset.tas.gov.au Mayor Greg Howard Mr Tim Watson Flinders Council [email protected] http://www.flinders.tas.gov.au Mayor Annie Revie Mr Warren Groves George Town Council [email protected] http://www.georgetown.tas.gov.au Mayor Greg Kieser Mr Shane Power Glamorgan Spring Bay Council [email protected] http://www.gsbc.tas.gov.au Mayor Jenny Woods (A/g) Ms Marissa Walters (A/g) Glenorchy City Council
    [Show full text]
  • House of Assembly Tuesday 18 August 2020
    PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY REPORT OF DEBATES Tuesday 18 August 2020 REVISED EDITION Tuesday 18 August 2020 The Speaker, Ms Hickey, took the Chair at 10 a.m., acknowledged the Traditional People and read Prayers. MESSAGES FROM GOVERNOR Division of Braddon - Resignation of Joan Rylah Madam SPEAKER - Honourable members, I wish to advise the House that I have received the following correspondence from Her Excellency the Governor: 27 July 2020 Dear Madam Speaker I have received a letter dated 27 July 2020 from Mrs Joan Rylah MP tendering her resignation as a member for Braddon in the House of Assembly. I have instructed the Electoral Commissioner to proceed in accordance with the provisions of Part 9 of the Electoral Act 2004. Sincerely C A Warner Governor. Division of Braddon - Election of Felix Ellis Madam SPEAKER - Honourable members, I advise you of the following communication I have received from Her Excellency the Governor: 17 August 2020 Dear Madam Speaker I forward herewith the Certificate of the Electoral Commissioner stating that a recount has been held under the provision of Part 9 of the Electoral Act 2004 to fill the vacancy in the Division of Braddon caused by the resignation of Mrs Joan Rylah. Upon a recount of the resigned member's ballot papers Felix Ellis has been elected to the vacancy and the election takes effect from today. Yours sincerely C A Warner Governor 1 Tuesday 18 August 2020 MEMBER SWORN Felix Asthon Ellis - Member for Braddon Felix Ashton Ellis, Member for the Division of Braddon, was sworn and declared that he had read the subscribed code of ethical conduct and race ethics.
    [Show full text]
  • Information for Candidates
    Tasmanian House of Assembly Election 1996 Information for Candidates Section 1 - Information Section 2 - Extracts from Relevant Legislation November 1995 Introduction Purpose of this booklet This information booklet is intended to assist intending candidates at the 1996 Tasmanian House of Assembly General Election. For ease of reading, some sections of the Electoral Act 1985 have been paraphrased. However, it is important to note that this booklet has no legal status and should not be substituted for the Act itself. As this is the first Candidate Information booklet produced for Tasmanian House of Assembly Elections, any comments or suggestions for improvement arc welcome. Unless otherwise specified section references in subject headings are from the Electoral Act 7 985. Role of the Tasmanian Electoral Office and Returning Officers Candidates should be aware that the role of the Tasmanian Electoral Office and Returning Officers is to administer the election in accordance with the Electoral Act 7985 While interpretation of the Act forms part of the daily function of Returning Officers, it is not their role to provide legal advice to candidates, groups or parties. It is in the best interests of candidates to obtain legal interpretations from their own legal advisers. “Section 2 - Extracts from relevant legislation A section containing legislation follows the information section. Please note that only some of the relevant extracts have been included and candidates should refer to the original Acts for further provisions. Useful tips: Shaded boxes throughout the booklet highlight practical advice for candidates. Purchasing the Electoral Act 7985 and the Constitution Act 1934 The Electoral Act 1985 and other relevant iegislation can be purchased from the Tasmanian Government Bookshop.
    [Show full text]
  • National Competition Policy
    TASMANIA NATIONAL COMPETITION POLICY PROGRESS REPORT May 2003 CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction 1 Overview 1 Review of the NCP Agreements 2 2 Reforms under the Competition Principles Agreement 3 Legislation review 4 Review processes 4 Progress with the LRP timetable 5 Major reviews 6 National reviews 12 Gatekeeper arrangements 13 Competitive neutrality 14 Government Business Enterprises 15 Recent reforms to GBEs 16 Other significant Government business activities 17 Competitive neutrality complaints mechanism 18 Monopoly prices oversight 18 Third Party Access 21 Electricity 21 Gas 21 3 Reforms under the Conduct Code Agreement 25 Extension of Part IV of the Trade Practices Act 1974 25 Reporting obligations under the CCA 25 4 Local Government and NCP reforms 27 Overview 28 Competitive neutrality 28 Prices oversight 29 Treatment of local government by-laws under the Government’s Legislation Review Program 29 iii 5 Sector Specific Reforms 31 Electricity industry reforms 32 Basslink 32 Wind Power Development 32 Structural Reform in Tasmania’s Electricity Supply Industry 32 Tasmania’s Participation in the National Electricity Market 33 Gas industry reforms 34 Water industry reforms 36 New water management legislation 37 Cost and pricing reforms 37 Institutional reform 52 Allocation and trading reforms 55 Environment and water quality reforms 60 Public consultation and education 74 Transport industry reforms 77 Transport reforms implemented since the 2002 Progress Report 80 Additional comments 80 6 Conclusion 83 7 Publications and Contacts 85 Policy
    [Show full text]