DOCSLIB.ORG

Synoptic Climatology of Extreme Snow and Avalanche Events in Southern Alaska Kristy C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Synoptic Climatology of Extreme Snow and Avalanche Events in Southern Alaska Kristy C University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 2016 Synoptic Climatology Of Extreme Snow And Avalanche Events In Southern Alaska Kristy C. Carter University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Geography Commons Recommended Citation Carter, K. C.(2016). Synoptic Climatology Of Extreme Snow And Avalanche Events In Southern Alaska. (Master's thesis). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/3764 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SYNOPTIC CLIMATOLOGY OF EXTREME SNOW AND AVALANCHE EVENTS IN SOUTHERN ALASKA by Kristy C. Carter Bachelor of Science Iowa State University, 2013 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science in Geography College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2016 Accepted by: Cary J. Mock, Director of Thesis April L. Hiscox, Reader Edsel A. Pena, Reader Lacy Ford, Senior Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies © Copyright by Kristy C. Carter, 2016 All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this thesis to my late grandparents Dwayne and Marge Shoemaker. Without their initial support and encouragement, I would not have discovered the joy and excitement of studying meteorology at the undergraduate and now graduate level. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the members of my thesis committee for their support and encouragement, Dr. Cary Mock, Dr. April Hiscox and Dr. Edsel Pena. I would also like to add extra thanks to my adviser, Dr. Mock, for his time, advice, and letting me take on this project. In addition, I would like to thank Jim Nelson with the National Weather Service in Anchorage, Alaska for getting me started on this project and the NOAA Hollings Scholarship Team and Regis & Associates, PC for providing the initial funds to do so. A special thank you to John Papineau and the rest of the staff at the Anchorage National Weather Service office, Dr. Tsing-Chang Chen and the Iowa State University Atmospheric Science Department faculty, fellow graduate students Sam Lillo and Kyle Ahern, and the University of South Carolina Geography Department faculty. Without all of these people, this project would not have been a possibility. The Alyeska and Eagle Crest ski resorts and staff and Dr. Eran Hood with the University of Alaska Southeast provided the detailed avalanche records used in this project, so I would like to acknowledge them and the American Meteorological Society for the opportunity to present my work at numerous conferences. Finally, I would like to thank my family, Steve, Kathy, and Korey Carter, Jack Mauss, and the numerous other friends, colleagues, and professionals in the greater meteorology community who have supported me through thousands of hours of work with their love and encouragement to see this project to its completion. iv ABSTRACT Snowfall distribution in southern Alaska during large snowfall events (>12 inches/day) is complex and dependent on several small-scale factors. Output from high- resolution WRF simulations was used to provide further insight into factors that contribute to differences in precipitation patterns. Common synoptic patterns among large snowfall events and cities were studied to create a snow climatology for seven cities in southern Alaska based on the predominant wind flow at the surface and aloft and the location of the surface low and 500 mb height field. Results aid in understanding the synoptic set-up for large snowfall events in each city and provide insight for increased skill in future forecasting applications. In addition, a snow avalanche climatology was created for two ski areas to understand avalanche occurrences and their triggers in southern Alaska. Avalanches have increased in frequency but decreased in size in the last 50 years, with increased avalanche mitigation techniques in more recent years in both locations. Although a majority of the documented avalanches were artificially triggered during the period of record, avalanches were evaluated for seasonal avalanche-climate relationships and separated into climate classifications based on a decision tree previously developed in the literature. Results confirm previous research with Eagle Crest and Alyeska achieving coastal and intermediate climate classifications respectively. Daily weather conditions during extreme avalanche years illustrate the seasonal variations are also governed by snowpack processes. The relationships between avalanches and large snowfall events were explored and common synoptic patterns were found. Correlations v remained low, however, because large snowfall events only account for a small percentage of total snow. Teleconnection indices were evaluated for their influence and relationship with snow and avalanche occurrences to see if large snowfall events and avalanches could be predicted on a seasonal timescale. Results indicate the need to evaluate changes in atmospheric patterns on a daily to weekly timescale to improve forecast skill. This requires moving away from monthly to seasonal analysis to better account for the shifts and fluctuations that surround the formation and occurrence of extreme snow and avalanche events in southern Alaska. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION ........................................................................................................................ iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................ iv ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................ v LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................... ix LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................... x LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................... xii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ......................................................................................... 4 2.1 SYNOPTIC WEATHER AND CLIMATE STUDIES IN ALASKA ..................................... 4 2.2 CHALLENGES IN SNOW MEASUREMENTS AND FORECASTS ................................... 6 2.3 AVALANCHE BASICS ............................................................................................. 8 2.4 CHALLENGES IN AVALANCHE FORECASTING ...................................................... 10 CHAPTER 3 DATA AND STUDY AREA .................................................................................. 13 3.1 STUDY AREA ....................................................................................................... 13 3.2 OBSERVATION DATA ........................................................................................... 15 3.3 REANALYSIS DATA ............................................................................................. 15 3.4 WRF MODEL ...................................................................................................... 15 3.5 TELECONNECTION DATA ..................................................................................... 16 3.6 AVALANCHE DATA ............................................................................................. 16 vii CHAPTER 4 METHODS ......................................................................................................... 20 4.1 SNOW CLIMATOLOGY ......................................................................................... 20 4.2 AVALANCHE CLIMATOLOGY ............................................................................... 23 4.3 COMPARISON OF EXTREME EVENTS .................................................................... 25 CHAPTER 5 RESULTS .......................................................................................................... 32 5.1 SNOW CLIMATOLOGY ......................................................................................... 32 5.2 AVALANCHE CLIMATOLOGY ............................................................................... 37 5.3 COMPARISON OF EXTREME EVENTS .................................................................... 43 CHAPTER 6 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................... 77 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................... 83 viii LIST OF TABLES Table 4.1 Snow event cases selected for inclusion in the WRF Model ............................ 27 Table 4.2 Description of teleconnection phases ................................................................ 28 Table 4.3 Avalanche size relative to path .......................................................................... 29 Table 4.4 Avalanche type .................................................................................................. 30 Table 4.5 Avalanche trigger .............................................................................................. 31 Table 5.1 Summary of snowfall frequency and distribution across the seven cities ......... 46 Table
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Climate Divisions for Alaska Based on Objective Methods Peter A
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Drought Mitigation Center Faculty Publications Drought -- National Drought Mitigation Center 2012 Climate Divisions for Alaska Based on Objective Methods Peter A. Bieniek University of Alaska Fairbanks, [email protected] Uma S. Bhatt University of Alaska Fairbanks Richard L. Thoman NOAA/National Weather Service/Weather Forecast Officea F irbanks Heather Angeloff University of Alaska Fairbanks James Partain NOAA/National Weather Service/Alaska Region See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtfacpub Part of the Climate Commons, Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Environmental Monitoring Commons, Hydrology Commons, Other Earth Sciences Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Bieniek, Peter A.; Bhatt, Uma S.; Thoman, Richard L.; Angeloff, Heather; Partain, James; Papineau, John; Fritsch, Frederick; Holloway, Eric; Walsh, John E.; Daly, Christopher; Shulski, Martha; Hufford, Gary; Hill, David F.; Calos, Stavros; and Gens, Rudiger, "Climate Divisions for Alaska Based on Objective Methods" (2012). Drought Mitigation Center Faculty Publications. 15. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/droughtfacpub/15 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Drought -- National Drought Mitigation Center at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Drought Mitigation Center Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator
    [Show full text]
  • Snow Avalanches J
    , . ^^'- If A HANDBOOK OF FORECASTING AND CONTROL MEASURE! Agriculture Handbook No. 194 January 1961 FOREST SERVICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Ai^ JANUARY 1961 AGRICULTURE HANDBOOK NO. 194 SNOW AVALANCHES J A Handbook of Forecasting and Control Measures k FSH2 2332.81 SNOW AVALANCHES :}o U^»TED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE SNOW AVALANCHES FSH2 2332.81 Contents INTRODUCTION 6.1 Snow Study Chart 6.2 Storm Plot and Storm Report Records CHAPTER 1 6.3 Snow Pit Studies 6.4 Time Profile AVALANCHE HAZARD AND PAST STUDIES CHAPTER 7 CHAPTER 2 7 SNOW STABILIZATION 7.1 Test and Protective Skiing 2 PHYSICS OF THE SNOW COVER 7.2 Explosives 2.1 The Solid Phase of the Hydrologie Cycle 7.21 Hand-Placed Charges 2.2 Formation of Snow in the Atmosphere 7.22 Artillery 2.3 Formation and Character of the Snow Cover CHAPTER 8 2.4 Mechanical Properties of Snow 8 SAFETY 2.5 Thermal Properties of the Snow Cover 8.1 Safety Objectives 2.6 Examples of Weather Influence on the Snow Cover 8.2 Safety Principles 8.3 Safety Regulations CHAPTER 3 8.31 Personnel 8.32 Avalanche Test and Protective Skiing 3 AVALANCHE CHARACTERISTICS 8.33 Avalanche Blasting 3.1 Avalanche Classification 8.34 Exceptions to Safety Code 3.11 Loose Snow Avalanches 3.12 Slab Avalanches CHAPTER 9 3.2 Tyi)es 3.3 Size 9 AVALANCHE DEFENSES 3.4 Avalanche Triggers 9.1 Diversion Barriers 9.2 Stabilization Barriers CHAPTER 4 9.3 Barrier Design Factors 4 TERRAIN 9.4 Reforestation 4.1 Slope Angle CHAPTER 10 4.2 Slope Profile 4.3 Ground Cover and Vegetation 10 AVALANCHE RESCUE 4.4 Slope
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALGARY Estimating Extreme Snow
    UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Estimating Extreme Snow Avalanche Runout for the Columbia Mountains and Fernie Area of British Columbia, Canada by: Katherine S. Johnston A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING CALGARY, ALBERTA AUGUST, 2011 ©Katherine S. Johnston 2011 ABSTRACT Extreme snow avalanche runout is typically estimated using a combination of historical and vegetation records as well as statistical and dynamic models. The two classes of statistical models (α – β and runout ratio) are based on estimating runout distance past the β-point, which is generally defined as the point where the avalanche slope incline first decreases to 10°. The parameters for these models vary from mountain range to mountain range. In Canada, α – β and runout ratio parameters have been published for the Rocky and Purcell Mountains and for the British Columbia Coastal mountains. Despite active development, no suitable tall avalanche path model parameters have been published for the Columbia Mountains or for the Lizard Range area around Fernie, BC. Using a dataset of 70 avalanche paths, statistical model parameters have been derived for these regions. In addition, the correlation between extreme and average snowfall values and avalanche runout is explored. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to Bruce Jamieson for giving me the opportunity to work on this project, and for coordinating the financial support for this project. His thoughtful advice, numerous reviews, and inspirational leadership have helped make this a fantastic experience. My thanks to Alan Jones for providing numerous hours of guidance, mentoring, and thoughtful discussion throughout this project, and for facilitating data acquisition from outside sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Fhwa-Wy-09/05F Snow Supporting
    FINAL REPORT FHWA-WY-09/05F State of Wyoming U.S. Department of Transportation Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration SNOW SUPPORTING STRUCTURES FOR AVALANCHE HAZARD REDUCTION, 151 AVALANCHE, HIGHWAY US 89/191, JACKSON, WYOMING By: InterAlpine Associates 83 El Camino Tesoros Sedona, Arizona 86336 April 2009 Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s) who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Wyoming Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The United States Government and the State of Wyoming do not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objectives of the document. Quality Assurance Statement The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Technical Report Documentation Page Report No. Government Accession No. Recipients Catalog No. FHWA-WY-09/05F Report Date Title and Subtitle April 2009 Snow Supporting Structures for Avalanche Hazard Reduction, 151 Avalanche, US 89/191, Jackson, Wyoming Performing Organization Code Author(s): Rand Decker; Joshua Hewes; Scotts Merry; Perry Wood Performing Organization Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Technology Assessment for Highway Avalanche Hazard Management: ‘Choosing the Right Tool for the Job’
    FINAL REPORT WYDOT WY-18/03F A Comprehensive Technology Assessment for Highway Avalanche Hazard Management: ‘Choosing the Right Tool for the Job’ Rand Decker, Ph.D., Principal Investigator 83 El Camino Tesoros, Sedona, Arizona 86336 (928) 202-8156 [email protected] Disclaimer Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Wyoming Department of Transportation (WYDOT) in the interest of information exchange. WYDOT assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. WYDOT does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document. Quality Assurance Statement WYDOT provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. WYDOT periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Quality Assurance Statement WYDOT provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. WYDOT periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Copyright No copyrighted material, except that which falls under the “fair use” clause, may be incorporated into a report without permission from the copyright owner, if the copyright owner requires such. Prior use of the material in a WYDOT or governmental publication does not necessarily constitute permission to use it in a later publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Avalanche Protection and Control in the Himalayas
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Defence Science Journal Def Sci J, Vol 35, No 2, April 1985, pp 255-266 Avalanche Protection and Control in the Himalayas N. MOHANRAO Snow & Avalanche Study Establishment, Manali Abstract. The problems of snow avalanches, their prediction and control in the Himalayas have assumed great relevance and importance not only for the Army but also for the progress of the Himalayan States of Jammu & Kashmir. Himachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh, whose upper reaches remain snowbound for nearly six months in a year. The paper discusses br~eflythe gravity of the problem and presents a broad outline of a case-study of avalanche control for Badrinath Temple and Township in Uttar Pradesh undertaken by the Snow & Avalanche Study Establishment (SASE), Manali. This and many other studies undertaken by the SASE illustrate the contribution of Defellce Science to the solution of this major problem affecting communications, tourism and hill development, as a spin-off from Defence Research. The Pirpanjals and the Great Himalayas, besides other ranges, experience heavy snow during the winter months particularly from January to March. The total snowfall is as much as 1500 cm in some years in the Western Himalayas. Storms lasting for several days bringing down at times more than 200 cm of snow in one spell lasting from 3 to 7 days are not uncommon. The problem is further accentuated when high intensities of 8 to 10 cm/hr prevail. The result is a heavy avalanche activity affecting Army posts and movements, communications, villages and winter tourism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Design of Avalanche Protection Dams .Pdf
    The design of avalanche protection dams. Recent practical and theoretical developments 1-DRAFT some sections still remain to be written, the document shows the intended section structure and contains draft introductory sections, sections about the design of deflecting and catching dams, and braking mounds, sections about impact pressures on walls, masts and other narrow constructions, appendixes about overrun of avalanches at Ryggfonn, loading of obstacles and a subsection about Iceland in an Appendix about laws and regulations July 25, 2006 1 Photographs on the front page: Top left: Mounds and catching dam in Neskaupstaður, eastern Iceland, photograph: Tómas Jóhannesson. Top right: A deflecting dam at Gudvangen, near Voss in western Norway, af- ter a successful deflection of an avalanche, photograph: ? ???. Bottom left: A catching dam, deflecting dam, and concrete wedges at Taconnaz, near Chamonix, France, photograph Christopher J. Keylock. Bottom right: A catching dam and a wedge at Galtür in the Paznaun valley, Tirol, Austria, photograph: ? ???. Contents 1 Introduction 9 2 Consultation with local authorities and decision makers 12 3 Overview of traditional design principles for avalanche dams 13 4 Avalanche dynamics 16 5 Deflecting and catching dams 18 5.1 Introduction . 18 5.2 Summary of the dam design procedure . 18 5.3 Dam geometry . 20 5.4 The dynamics of flow against deflecting and catching dams . 22 5.5 Supercritical overflow . 25 5.6 Upstream shock . 26 5.7 Loss of momentum in the impact with a dam . 31 5.8 Combined criteria . 32 5.9 Snow drift . 34 5.10 Comparison of proposed criteria with observations of natural avalanches that have hit dams or other obstacles .
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Impacts in Anchorage
    MARCH 2016 STRENGTHENING RESILIENCE CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS IN ANCHORAGE Located in Southcentral Alaska, Anchorage is the most losses from extreme events, and threats to the health and populated area of the state and its economic hub, home safety of their employees. The business community in to about 300,000 people, or about half of the state’s resi- Anchorage can work together with city and state agen- dents.1 Energy production is the main driver of the state’s cies, along with other stakeholders to evaluate potential economy, although minerals, seafood, tourism, and agri- risks and take steps toward enhancing the community’s culture also contribute. Many oil and gas companies are resilience. headquartered in Anchorage.2 Anchorage is the state’s primary transportation, communications, trade, service, TEMPERATURE and finance center. The local economy is driven mostly by oil and gas, the military, transportation, and the tour- As a state, Alaska has warmed at more than twice the rate ism industry. The Port of Anchorage serves as the state’s of the rest of the United States, with state-wide average shipping hub. annual temperature increasing by 3°F and average winter temperature increasing by 6°F over the past 60 years.4 Anchorage is a diverse community, with minority groups representing 34 percent of its population and Temperature changes in Anchorage have been similar showing significant growth in these groups (including to the statewide average, with average annual tempera- Asian, Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, Native groups, African ture increasing by 3.2°F and winter temperatures increas- American, and other races).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: the Affected Environment
    Chapter 3: The Affected Environment 3.0 THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 3.0.1 Introduction Chapter 3 – The Affected Environment describes the physical and biological environment (e.g., water resources, wildlife, etc.) as well as the human environment (e.g., social and economic factors, recreation, etc.), which may be affected by the range of alternatives, as described in Chapter 2 - Alternatives. Much of the information on the affected environment is compiled from detailed technical reports and other analyses prepared by the USFS and consultants. Some of these reports are attached to this FEIS as appendices. All reports are available for review as part of the Analysis File maintained for this project at the MBSNF Supervisor’s Office. References cited in this FEIS are provided in Chapter 5 - References. 3.0.2 Analysis Area The “analysis area” (referred to as the “Study Area” throughout this document) varies by resource area. The Study Area includes all public (USFS) lands as well as private land owned by Ski Lifts, Inc. and other land holders. When discussing individual projects within the Study Area, the following terms are used to distinguish the different locations within the SUP: Summit East, Summit Central, and Summit West, are collectively referred to as “The Summit.” Alpental, when discussed individually, is referred to as “Alpental.” All four ski areas are collectively referred to as “The Summit-at-Snoqualmie.” Figure 3.0-1, Study Area illustrates the boundaries of the Study Area, including The Summit and Alpental. Figure 3.0-2, 5th Field Watersheds illustrates the boundaries of the two 5th field watersheds used in this FEIS analysis: the South Fork Snoqualmie River Watershed (S.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility of Seismic Monitoring to Identify Avalanche
    FEASIBILITY OF SEISMIC MONITORING TO IDENTIFY AVALANCHE ACTIVITY: SNOQUALMIE PASS, WA __________________________________ A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty Central Washington University __________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Geology __________________________________ by Kathryn Johnston June 2013 CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Graduate Studies We hereby approve the thesis of Kathryn Johnston Candidate for the degree of Master of Science APPROVED FOR THE GRADUATE FACULTY ______________ _________________________________________ Dr. Tim Melbourne ______________ _________________________________________ Dr. Paul Winberry ______________ _________________________________________ Dr. Susan Kaspari ______________ _________________________________________ Dean of Graduate Studies ii ABSTRACT FEASIBILITY OF SEISMIC MONITORING TO IDENTIFY AVALANCHE ACTIVITY: SNOQUALMIE PASS, WA by Kathryn Johnston June 2013 Avalanches across the Interstate-90 corridor over Snoqualmie Pass, in Washington State, are a concern for winter travelers and backcountry recreation. The temporary closure of the interstate for avalanche mitigation work also affects commerce by delaying transportation of merchandise. The study of seismic signals associated with snow avalanches could allow for greater understanding of avalanche properties, while remote sensing of avalanche activity could help established avalanche control programs and regional avalanche centers with forecasting and mitigation efforts. Two seismic stations were installed near the Alpental ski area on Snoqualmie Pass and recorded seismic activity throughout the winters of 2009-2010 and 2010-2011. During the winter of 2010-2011, two avalanches were successfully recorded, one artificially released with explosives and one naturally during a rain on snow event. These results show that it is possible to record avalanche activity over the traffic noise of the interstate and that avalanche activity can be distinguished from other seismic sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowstone National Park Wyoming, Montana, Idaho
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Yellowstone National Park Wyoming, Montana, Idaho Yellowstone National Park WINTER USE PLAN / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT November 2011 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK WINTER USE PLAN / ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Lead Agency: National Park Service (NPS), U.S. Department of the Interior This Yellowstone National Park Winter Use Plan / Environmental Impact Statement (plan/EIS) evaluates the impacts of a range of alternatives for managing winter use/access in the interior of Yellowstone National Park (Yellowstone or the park) in a manner that protects and preserves natural and cultural resources and natural processes, provides a variety of visitor use experiences while minimizing conflicts among various users, and promotes visitor and employee safety. Upon conclusion of the plan/EIS and decision-making process, the alternative selected for implementation will become the winter use plan, which will specifically address the issue of oversnow vehicle (OSV) use in the interior of the park. It will also form the basis for a special regulation to manage OSV use in the park should an alternative be selected that allows OSV use to continue. This plan/EIS evaluates the impacts of the no-action alternative (alternative 1) and seven action alternatives (alternatives 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and the preferred alternative (alternative 8)). Alternative 1 would not permit public OSV use in Yellowstone because the 2009 interim rule expired March 15, 2011, but would allow for approved non- motorized use to continue. Alternative 1 has been identified as the NPS environmentally preferable alternative.
    [Show full text]
  • It Came to Pass 50 Years of Highs and Lows on the Salmo-Creston
    Bringing the FREE Creston Valley together. October 2013 It Came to Pass 50 years of highs and lows on the Salmo-Creston Mayor’s Desk Toyota becomes firefighter for a day The Arts Health Music teachers present Cold and flu season Mosaic of Sound inspires comparison It’s Deere Season *4.9% for 48 months-Oer valid from March 1, 2013 until July 31, 2013. Subject to John Deere Financial approval and dealer participation. In the event you default on this or any John Deere Financial Multi-Use Account transaction, interest on all outstanding balances on your Multi-use accounts (including on this and all special Term transactions on your Multi-use Account) will begin to accrue immediately at 19.75% AIR from the date of default until paid in full, and you will be required to make monthly payments on your Multi-use Account equal to 2.5% (personal use); 3.0% (commercial use) of the original amounts nanced plus interest. Taxes, set-up, delivery, freight, and preparation charges not included and may increase price or monthly payment(s). Minimum purchase and nance amount may be required. See your dealer for details. Program subject to change, without notice, at any time. For purchases on your Multi-use Account for personal, agricultural and commercial use. For eligible purchases of goods and services: 1) a minimum monthly payment of $342.65 is required; and 2) nance charges will begin to accrue immediately on amount nanced at 17.9% per annum. †0% for 72 months-Oer valid from February 1, 2013 until April 30, 2013.
    [Show full text]