UNIVERSITY of CALGARY Estimating Extreme Snow

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UNIVERSITY of CALGARY Estimating Extreme Snow UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Estimating Extreme Snow Avalanche Runout for the Columbia Mountains and Fernie Area of British Columbia, Canada by: Katherine S. Johnston A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING CALGARY, ALBERTA AUGUST, 2011 ©Katherine S. Johnston 2011 ABSTRACT Extreme snow avalanche runout is typically estimated using a combination of historical and vegetation records as well as statistical and dynamic models. The two classes of statistical models (α – β and runout ratio) are based on estimating runout distance past the β-point, which is generally defined as the point where the avalanche slope incline first decreases to 10°. The parameters for these models vary from mountain range to mountain range. In Canada, α – β and runout ratio parameters have been published for the Rocky and Purcell Mountains and for the British Columbia Coastal mountains. Despite active development, no suitable tall avalanche path model parameters have been published for the Columbia Mountains or for the Lizard Range area around Fernie, BC. Using a dataset of 70 avalanche paths, statistical model parameters have been derived for these regions. In addition, the correlation between extreme and average snowfall values and avalanche runout is explored. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to Bruce Jamieson for giving me the opportunity to work on this project, and for coordinating the financial support for this project. His thoughtful advice, numerous reviews, and inspirational leadership have helped make this a fantastic experience. My thanks to Alan Jones for providing numerous hours of guidance, mentoring, and thoughtful discussion throughout this project, and for facilitating data acquisition from outside sources. Thanks also to Chris Stethem (Chris Stethem and Associates), Mark Vesley (Fernie Alpine Resort), Steve Kuijt (Island Lake Catskiing) and Craig Ellis (Imperial Metals) for collecting detailed observations and for sharing field data. For assistance with summer and winter fieldwork I would like to thank my fellow students Cameron Ross, Mike Smith, Dave Tracz, Cora Shea, Ryan Buhler, and Scott Thumlert, and ASARC technicians Mark Kolasinski, Deanna Andersen and Michael Shynkaryk. For dedicated and detailed proof reading, thanks to Ryan Buhler, Scott Thumlert and Sascha Bellaire. For field support of the ASARC program and for practical insight I would like to thank Bruce McMahon, Jeff Goodrich, Rob Hemming, and the entire Avalanche Control Section of Glacier National Park. For financial support of the ASARC program, I would like to acknowledge and thank to Natural Sciences and Research Council and Canada (NSERC), the Helicat Canada Association, the Canadian Avalanche Association, Mike Wiegele Helicopter Skiing, the Canada West Ski Area Association, Parks Canada, the Association of Canadian Mountain Guides, the Backcountry Lodges of British Columbia Association, the Canadian Ski Guide Association and Teck Coal. Thank you to the Alliance Pipeline for supporting me with the Naomi Heffler Memorial Scholarship and to the Alberta Scholarship Programs for supporting me with an Alberta Graduate Student Scholarship. iv Table of Contents ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................ iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................. xi LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................ xv 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Snow Avalanches .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Avalanche Terrain............................................................................................................. 4 1.3 Avalanche Motion ............................................................................................................ 5 1.4 Avalanche Frequency and Return Interval ....................................................................... 8 1.5 Avalanche Accidents and Costs in Canada ....................................................................... 8 1.6 Avalanche Hazard Mitigation ......................................................................................... 10 1.7 Avalanche Hazard Zoning in Canada .............................................................................. 11 1.8 Avalanche Runout Models ............................................................................................. 13 1.9 Assessing Avalanche Hazard for Land Use Planning ...................................................... 14 1.10 Influence of Climate on Runout ..................................................................................... 16 1.11 Objectives and Overview of Thesis ................................................................................ 18 2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW .......................................................................................................... 20 2.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................... 20 2.2 Key Developments in the Theory of Statistical Models ................................................. 21 2.3 Statistical Runout Models .............................................................................................. 23 2.3.1 Alpha-Beta Statistical Models ................................................................................. 23 2.3.2 Runout Ratio Statistical Model ............................................................................... 25 2.3.3 Scale Effects in Extreme Avalanche Runout Models .............................................. 26 2.3.4 Climate and Geomorphology Effects on Extreme Avalanche Runout Estimation .. 28 2.4 Dynamic Runout Models ................................................................................................ 30 2.5 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 31 v 3.0 STUDY AREA AND METHODS ............................................................................................. 33 3.1 Study Areas ..................................................................................................................... 33 3.1.1 Fernie Area .............................................................................................................. 33 3.1.2 Columbia Mountains ............................................................................................... 34 3.2 Avalanche Path and Precipitation Data ......................................................................... 35 3.2.1 Avalanche Path Data for the South Rocky Mountains............................................ 37 3.2.2 Avalanche Path Data for the Columbia Mountains ............................................... 39 3.2.3 Precipitation Data ................................................................................................... 41 3.3 Field Methods and Equipment ....................................................................................... 43 3.3.1 Survey Procedures .................................................................................................. 44 3.3.2 Field Indicators of Avalanche Size and Frequency .................................................. 45 3.4 Avalanche Path Characteristics ...................................................................................... 48 3.5 Sources of Uncertainty ................................................................................................... 49 4.0 ANALYSIS AND RESULTS ..................................................................................................... 51 4.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................... 51 4.2 Data ................................................................................................................................ 51 4.2.1 Description of Variables .......................................................................................... 51 4.2.2 Descriptive Statistics and Distribution of Variables ................................................ 54 4.3 Alpha-Beta Statistical Runout Models ........................................................................... 60 4.3.1 Description of Multiple Regression Method........................................................... 60 4.3.2 Fernie Area Multiple Regression Models ................................................................ 61 4.3.3 Fernie Area Simplified Regression Model ............................................................... 65 4.3.4 Columbias Mountains Multiple Regression Models ............................................... 69 4.3.5 Columbia Mountains Simplified Regression Model ................................................ 72 4.3.6 Columbia Mountains Simplified Regression Models by Sub-Range ....................... 75 4.3.7 Summary of Alpha-Beta Model Parameters ..........................................................
Recommended publications
  • Wildlife Information for Commercial Backcountry Recreation Opportunities in the North Central Monashee Mountains
    WILDLIFE INFORMATION FOR COMMERCIAL BACKCOUNTRY RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES IN THE NORTH CENTRAL MONASHEE MOUNTAINS 1.0 INTRODUCTION Amongst the wide variety of wildlife residing in the North Central Monashee Mountains are rare, threatened or endangered species as well as species of special management emphasis. Color code status has been assigned to species to indicate their vulnerability. Red listed: Includes any indigenous species or subspecies (taxa) considered to be Extirpated, Endangered, or Threatened in British Columbia. Blue listed: Includes any indigenous species or subspecies (taxa) considered to be Vulnerable in British Columbia. Special Management: Includes species which are not red or blue listed but are particularly sensitive to a variety of disturbances and require additional management emphasis. Backcountry recreation has the potential to impact wildlife and wildlife habitat, depending on the location, time of year, intensity, frequency and type of backcountry recreation activity. However, with thorough planning, impacts to wildlife from commercial backcountry recreation can be mitigated. 2.0 COMMERCIAL BACKCOUNTRY RECREATION GUIDELINES During 2000, the Ministry of Environment recognized the need for province-wide commercial backcountry recreation guidelines to address wildlife concerns and allow ministry staff to be provincially consistent in their evaluation of backcountry recreation proposals. The draft provincial guidelines are currently under review, and interim guidelines entitled Expanded Kootenay Region Interim Wildlife Guidelines for Commercial Backcountry Recreation in British Columbia (http://www.elp.gov.bc.ca/wld/comrec/crecintro.html) have been established. The guidelines will assist commercial backcountry operators and government agency staff in protecting wildlife and wildlife habitat while sustaining ecotourism and adventure travel in British Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium-Lead Age Constraints and Structural Analysis
    Uranium-Lead Age Constraints and Structural Analysis for the Ruddock Creek Zinc-Lead Deposit: Insight into the Tectonic Evolution of the Neoproterozoic Metalliferous Windermere Supergroup, Northern Monashee Mountains, Southern British Columbia (NTS 082M) L.M. Theny, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, [email protected] H.D. Gibson, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC J.L. Crowley, Boise State University, Boise, ID Theny, L.M., Gibson, H.D. and Crowley, J.L. (2015): Uranium-lead age constraints and structural analysis for the Ruddock Creek zinc- lead deposit: insight into the tectonic evolution of the Neoproterozoic metalliferous Windermere Supergroup, northern Monashee Moun- tains, southern British Columbia (NTS 082M); in Geoscience BC Summary of Activities 2014, Geoscience BC, Report 2015-1, p. 151– 164. Introduction syenite gneiss and syenite gneiss occur as concordant lay- ers within the calcsilicate gneiss. Pegmatite and granitoid The Ruddock Creek property (Figure 1) is situated within intrusions account for approximately 50% of the overall the Windermere Supergroup of the northern Monashee outcrop (Fyles, 1970; Scammell, 1993; Höy, 2001). The Mountains of British Columbia. Structurally, the Ruddock metasedimentary rocks are thought to belong to the Creek property is interpreted to reside within the base of the Windermere Supergroup (Scammell, 1993), which is an Selkirk allochthon, in the immediate hanging wall of the important stratigraphic succession in the North American Monashee décollement, a crustal-scale, thrust-sense duc- Cordillera interpreted to have been originally deposited tile shear zone. Crustal thickening associated with poly- along the rifted western margin of Laurentia during Neo- phase deformation involved at least three episodes of proterozoic time (Gabrielse, 1972; Stewart, 1972, 1976; superposed folding of rocks in the region and two prograde Burchfield and Davis, 1975; Stewart and Suczek, 1977; metamorphic events (Fyles, 1970; Scammell and Brown, Monger and Price, 1979; Eisbacher, 1981; Scammell and 1990; Scammell, 1993; Höy, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Snow Avalanches J
    , . ^^'- If A HANDBOOK OF FORECASTING AND CONTROL MEASURE! Agriculture Handbook No. 194 January 1961 FOREST SERVICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Ai^ JANUARY 1961 AGRICULTURE HANDBOOK NO. 194 SNOW AVALANCHES J A Handbook of Forecasting and Control Measures k FSH2 2332.81 SNOW AVALANCHES :}o U^»TED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE SNOW AVALANCHES FSH2 2332.81 Contents INTRODUCTION 6.1 Snow Study Chart 6.2 Storm Plot and Storm Report Records CHAPTER 1 6.3 Snow Pit Studies 6.4 Time Profile AVALANCHE HAZARD AND PAST STUDIES CHAPTER 7 CHAPTER 2 7 SNOW STABILIZATION 7.1 Test and Protective Skiing 2 PHYSICS OF THE SNOW COVER 7.2 Explosives 2.1 The Solid Phase of the Hydrologie Cycle 7.21 Hand-Placed Charges 2.2 Formation of Snow in the Atmosphere 7.22 Artillery 2.3 Formation and Character of the Snow Cover CHAPTER 8 2.4 Mechanical Properties of Snow 8 SAFETY 2.5 Thermal Properties of the Snow Cover 8.1 Safety Objectives 2.6 Examples of Weather Influence on the Snow Cover 8.2 Safety Principles 8.3 Safety Regulations CHAPTER 3 8.31 Personnel 8.32 Avalanche Test and Protective Skiing 3 AVALANCHE CHARACTERISTICS 8.33 Avalanche Blasting 3.1 Avalanche Classification 8.34 Exceptions to Safety Code 3.11 Loose Snow Avalanches 3.12 Slab Avalanches CHAPTER 9 3.2 Tyi)es 3.3 Size 9 AVALANCHE DEFENSES 3.4 Avalanche Triggers 9.1 Diversion Barriers 9.2 Stabilization Barriers CHAPTER 4 9.3 Barrier Design Factors 4 TERRAIN 9.4 Reforestation 4.1 Slope Angle CHAPTER 10 4.2 Slope Profile 4.3 Ground Cover and Vegetation 10 AVALANCHE RESCUE 4.4 Slope
    [Show full text]
  • Monashee Park Plan
    Monashee Park Management Plan October 2014 Cover Page Photo Location: Mount Fosthall from Fawn Lake Cover Page Photo Credit: Kevin Wilson (BC Parks) All photos contained within this plan are credited to BC Parks (unless otherwise stated). This document replaces the Monashee Provincial Park Master Plan (1993). Monashee Park Management Plan Approved by: October 1st, 2014 ____________________________ __________________ John Trewhitt Date A/Regional Director, Kootenay Okanagan BC Parks October 1st, 2014 ______________________________ __________________ Brian Bawtinheimer Date Executive Director, Parks Planning and Management Branch BC Parks Acknowledgements BC Parks is greatly indebted to visionaries such as Bob Ahrens, Ken and Una Dobson, Mike and Jean Freeman, Doug and Nesta Kermode, Paddy Mackie, Sid Draper, George Falconer, E.G. Oldham, R. Broadland, C.D. ‘Bill’ Osborne and early members of the North Okanagan Naturalists Club. In the 1950s and 60s much of the early groundwork for the establishment of the park was made by these individuals. Special acknowledgement is owed also to Ernest Laviolette, Eugene Foisy and Charlie Foisy. Their wilderness adventure over several months one summer in the 1960s was captured on the film “The Call of the Monashee”. This film, and the publicity it created, was another pivotal component towards the protection of this spectacular wilderness area for future generations. The Friends of Monashee Park and the Cherry Ridge Management Committee were instrumental in providing information on community interests and history within the park as were current members of the North Okanagan Naturalist Club, notably Kay Bartholomew and Pamela Jenkins. Dale Kermode provided invaluable historical photos of his late father’s (Doug Kermode) early explorations in the park.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Fhwa-Wy-09/05F Snow Supporting
    FINAL REPORT FHWA-WY-09/05F State of Wyoming U.S. Department of Transportation Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration SNOW SUPPORTING STRUCTURES FOR AVALANCHE HAZARD REDUCTION, 151 AVALANCHE, HIGHWAY US 89/191, JACKSON, WYOMING By: InterAlpine Associates 83 El Camino Tesoros Sedona, Arizona 86336 April 2009 Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s) who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Wyoming Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The United States Government and the State of Wyoming do not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objectives of the document. Quality Assurance Statement The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Technical Report Documentation Page Report No. Government Accession No. Recipients Catalog No. FHWA-WY-09/05F Report Date Title and Subtitle April 2009 Snow Supporting Structures for Avalanche Hazard Reduction, 151 Avalanche, US 89/191, Jackson, Wyoming Performing Organization Code Author(s): Rand Decker; Joshua Hewes; Scotts Merry; Perry Wood Performing Organization Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Technology Assessment for Highway Avalanche Hazard Management: ‘Choosing the Right Tool for the Job’
    FINAL REPORT WYDOT WY-18/03F A Comprehensive Technology Assessment for Highway Avalanche Hazard Management: ‘Choosing the Right Tool for the Job’ Rand Decker, Ph.D., Principal Investigator 83 El Camino Tesoros, Sedona, Arizona 86336 (928) 202-8156 [email protected] Disclaimer Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Wyoming Department of Transportation (WYDOT) in the interest of information exchange. WYDOT assumes no liability for the use of the information contained in this document. WYDOT does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the document. Quality Assurance Statement WYDOT provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. WYDOT periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Quality Assurance Statement WYDOT provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. WYDOT periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Copyright No copyrighted material, except that which falls under the “fair use” clause, may be incorporated into a report without permission from the copyright owner, if the copyright owner requires such. Prior use of the material in a WYDOT or governmental publication does not necessarily constitute permission to use it in a later publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Avalanche Characteristics of a Transitional Snow Climate—Columbia Mountains, British Columbia, Canada
    Cold Regions Science and Technology 37 (2003) 255–276 www.elsevier.com/locate/coldregions Avalanche characteristics of a transitional snow climate—Columbia Mountains, British Columbia, Canada Pascal Ha¨gelia,*, David M. McClungb a Atmospheric Science Program, University of British Columbia, 1984 West Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z2 b Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Received 1 September 2002; accepted 2 July 2003 Abstract The focus of this study lies on the analysis of avalanche characteristics in the Columbia Mountains in relation to the local snow climate. First, the snow climate of the mountain range is examined using a recently developed snow climate classification scheme. Avalanche observations made by a large helicopter operator are used to examine the characteristics of natural avalanche activity. The results show that the Columbia Mountains have a transitional snow climate with a strong maritime influence. Depending on the maritime influence, the percentage of natural avalanche activity on persistent weak layers varies between 0% and 40%. Facet–crust combinations, which primarily form after rain-on-snow events in the early season, and surface hoar layers are the most important types of persistent weak layers. The avalanche activity characteristics on these two persistent weak layers are examined in detail. The study implies that, even though the ‘avalanche climate’ and ‘snow climate’ of an area are closely related, there should be a clear differentiation between these two terms, which are currently used synonymously. We suggest the use of the term ‘avalanche climate’ as a distinct adjunct to the description of the snow climate of an area.
    [Show full text]
  • Avalanche Protection and Control in the Himalayas
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Defence Science Journal Def Sci J, Vol 35, No 2, April 1985, pp 255-266 Avalanche Protection and Control in the Himalayas N. MOHANRAO Snow & Avalanche Study Establishment, Manali Abstract. The problems of snow avalanches, their prediction and control in the Himalayas have assumed great relevance and importance not only for the Army but also for the progress of the Himalayan States of Jammu & Kashmir. Himachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh, whose upper reaches remain snowbound for nearly six months in a year. The paper discusses br~eflythe gravity of the problem and presents a broad outline of a case-study of avalanche control for Badrinath Temple and Township in Uttar Pradesh undertaken by the Snow & Avalanche Study Establishment (SASE), Manali. This and many other studies undertaken by the SASE illustrate the contribution of Defellce Science to the solution of this major problem affecting communications, tourism and hill development, as a spin-off from Defence Research. The Pirpanjals and the Great Himalayas, besides other ranges, experience heavy snow during the winter months particularly from January to March. The total snowfall is as much as 1500 cm in some years in the Western Himalayas. Storms lasting for several days bringing down at times more than 200 cm of snow in one spell lasting from 3 to 7 days are not uncommon. The problem is further accentuated when high intensities of 8 to 10 cm/hr prevail. The result is a heavy avalanche activity affecting Army posts and movements, communications, villages and winter tourism.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Okanagan College 2010-11 Viewbook Introducing Okanagan College
    Introducing Okanagan College 2010-11 Viewbook www.okanagan.bc.ca introducing okanagan college Hi, my name is Arianne and I’m a second-year Business Administration student at Okanagan College. I’m here to walk you through our viewbook so you can get a student’s perspective of Okanagan College. Before we get going let me tell you a little about my school. Okanagan College is a community college that offers more than 120 degree, diploma and certificate programs in business, university studies, health and social development, engineering technologies, continuing studies and trades. This school has been around since 1963 and it has a long history of providing education in the Okanagan, Similkameen and Shuswap-Revelstoke regions. After I finished high school I decided to go to Okanagan College because I’d heard really good things about the College and wanted to stay close to home. I also watched my older brother complete his business degree at the College and I could really see myself as an Okanagan College student. I’m from Kelowna, but lots of students come from all over to go to Okanagan College. It is a school with a solid reputation, great professors and is a great place to make new friends and have some fun…but not too much fun. Anyways, let’s get started. Quick Facts Okanagan College: • Is the largest community college in BC east of the Lower Mainland with 1000 employees serving more than 19,000 students. • Serves the Shuswap-Revelstoke, North, Central, and South Okanagan-Similkameen regions with major campuses in Salmon Arm, Vernon, Kelowna and Penticton and education centres in Revelstoke, Summerland and Oliver.
    [Show full text]
  • The Design of Avalanche Protection Dams .Pdf
    The design of avalanche protection dams. Recent practical and theoretical developments 1-DRAFT some sections still remain to be written, the document shows the intended section structure and contains draft introductory sections, sections about the design of deflecting and catching dams, and braking mounds, sections about impact pressures on walls, masts and other narrow constructions, appendixes about overrun of avalanches at Ryggfonn, loading of obstacles and a subsection about Iceland in an Appendix about laws and regulations July 25, 2006 1 Photographs on the front page: Top left: Mounds and catching dam in Neskaupstaður, eastern Iceland, photograph: Tómas Jóhannesson. Top right: A deflecting dam at Gudvangen, near Voss in western Norway, af- ter a successful deflection of an avalanche, photograph: ? ???. Bottom left: A catching dam, deflecting dam, and concrete wedges at Taconnaz, near Chamonix, France, photograph Christopher J. Keylock. Bottom right: A catching dam and a wedge at Galtür in the Paznaun valley, Tirol, Austria, photograph: ? ???. Contents 1 Introduction 9 2 Consultation with local authorities and decision makers 12 3 Overview of traditional design principles for avalanche dams 13 4 Avalanche dynamics 16 5 Deflecting and catching dams 18 5.1 Introduction . 18 5.2 Summary of the dam design procedure . 18 5.3 Dam geometry . 20 5.4 The dynamics of flow against deflecting and catching dams . 22 5.5 Supercritical overflow . 25 5.6 Upstream shock . 26 5.7 Loss of momentum in the impact with a dam . 31 5.8 Combined criteria . 32 5.9 Snow drift . 34 5.10 Comparison of proposed criteria with observations of natural avalanches that have hit dams or other obstacles .
    [Show full text]
  • Glacier and Mount Revelstoke National Parks Souvenir Guidebook
    ZUZANA DRIEDIGER Contributors Designer – Kathryn Whiteside Print and Interactive Design Parks Canada Design Team – Vérèna Blasy, Rob Buchanan, Heather Caverhill, Zuzana Driediger, Megan Long, Rick Reynolds parkscanada.gc.ca Cover Art and Glacier 125 Commemorative Posters – Rob Buchanan – Parks Canada Call our toll-free Contributing Artists – Vérèna Blasy, Rob Buchanan, Zuzana information line Driediger, Friends of Mount Revelstoke and Glacier, Ryan Gill, Diny Harrison, Greg Hill, Jason Keerak, Mas Matsushita, Dan McCarthy, 1-888-773-8888 Jackie Pendergast, Rick Reynolds, Shelley L. Ross, Chili Thom, Alice Mount Revelstoke Weber, Kathryn Whiteside, Kip Wiley, John Woods and Glacier National Parks reception Many thanks to the following institutions for permission to reproduce historic images: Canada Post Corporation, Canada 250-837-7500 Science and Technology Museum, Canadian Pacific Archives, Library www.pc.gc.ca/glacier and Archives Canada, National Herbarium of Canada, Revelstoke Museum and Archives, Smithsonian Institution Archives, Whyte www.pc.gc.ca/revelstoke Museum of the Canadian Rockies Printed by: Hemlock Printers $2.00 Souvenir Guide Book 2 Welcome to Glacier and Mount Revelstoke National Parks and Rogers Pass National Historic Site We hope that you enjoy your visit to these very special Canadian places. Glacier, Mount Revelstoke and Rogers Pass are part of an exciting and historic cultural landscape that stretches from Kicking Horse Pass on the British Columbia/Alberta boundary to the site of the Canadian Pacific Railway’s Last Spike at Craigellachie. Close connection with nature has always been a hallmark of the human experience here in the Columbia Mountains. First Nations people have lived and travelled along the mighty Columbia River for millennia.
    [Show full text]
  • Sol Mountain Touring: Backcountry Comfort in British Columbia’S Monashee Mountains by Debbie Mckeown
    Sol Mountain Touring: Backcountry Comfort in British Columbia’s Monashee Mountains By Debbie McKeown hen I first spot Sol Mountain Lodge, it looks like a small dot in a wilderness of Wuntouched white. The helicopter almost skims the top of the snow-laden trees as we make our final approach. It touches down, is quickly unloaded and takes off again, leaving me here for the next four days. Sol Mountain Touring’s backcountry lodge is located in Canada’s spectacular southern Monashee Mountains mid-way between Vernon and Revelstoke, British Columbia. I feel like I have been transported to another world. I am greeted by Aaron Cooperman, one of the friendly owners of Sol Mountain Touring and a certified ACMG mountain guide. Aaron’s first priority is getting the new guests on track with some basic safety training. We are outfitted with avalanche beacons and instructed on their use including a practice session of burying and searching for them. Sol Mountain Touring’s high safety standards require snowshoers, cross-country skiers and backcountry skiers to wear the beacons at all times when away from the lodge. 1 And then … the reason I came. I strap on my snowshoes and head out to explore with Aaron and several other guests. It is snowing hard for much of the day, adding fresh powder to the significant existing snowpack. While this makes for slow going, I feel privileged at the opportunity to enjoy such pristine wilderness. There are simply no other tracks, animal or human. When the sky clears slightly, the pale light of the sun magically shines through a snow squall.
    [Show full text]