History Textbook Alignment: Grade 11 [PDF]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sip-In" That Drew from the Civil Rights Movement by History.Com, Adapted by Newsela Staff on 11.07.19 Word Count 887 Level 1020L
The gay "sip-in" that drew from the civil rights movement By History.com, adapted by Newsela staff on 11.07.19 Word Count 887 Level 1020L Image 1. A bartender in Julius's Bar refuses to serve John Timmins, Dick Leitsch, Craig Rodwell and Randy Wicker, members of the Mattachine Society, an early American gay rights group, who were protesting New York liquor laws that prevented serving gay customers on April 21, 1966. Photo from: Getty Images/Fred W. McDarrah. In 1966, on a spring afternoon in Greenwich Village, three men set out to change the political and social climate of New York City. After having gone from one bar to the next, the men reached a cozy tavern named Julius'. They approached the bartender, proclaimed they were gay and then requested a drink, but were promptly denied service. The trio had accomplished their goal: their "sip-in" had begun. The men belonged to the Mattachine Society, an early organization dedicated to fighting for gay rights. They wanted to show that bars in the city discriminated against gay people. Discrimination against the gay community was a common practice at the time. Still, this discrimination was less obvious than the discriminatory Jim Crow laws in the South that forced racial segregation. Bartenders Refused Service To Gay Couples This article is available at 5 reading levels at https://newsela.com. A person's sexual orientation couldn't be detected as easily as a person's sex or race. With that in mind, the New York State Liquor Authority, a state agency that controls liquor sales, took action. -
Frank: a Life in Politics from the Great Society to Same-Sex Marriage by Barney Frank
National Museum of American Jewish History Quarterly Members & Docents Book Club Frank: A Life in Politics from the Great Society to Same-Sex Marriage by Barney Frank Discussed at NMAJH on August 31, 2015 Barnett "Barney" Frank (born March 31, 1940) is an American politician who served as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives from Massachusetts from 1981 to 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, he served as chairman of the House Financial Services Committee (2007–2011) and was a leading co-sponsor of the 2010 Dodd–Frank Act, a sweeping reform of the U.S. financial industry. Frank, a resident of Newton, Massachusetts, is considered the most prominent gay politician in the United States. (Wikipedia) Franklin Edward "Frank" Kameny (May 21, 1925 – October 11, 2011) was an American gay rights activist. In 1957, Kameny was dismissed from his position as an astronomer in the U.S. Army's Army Map Service in Washington, D.C. because of his homosexuality, leading him to begin "a Herculean struggle with the American establishment" that would "spearhead a new period of militancy in the homosexual rights movement of the early 1960s". He has been referred to as "one of the most significant figures" in the American gay rights movement. (Wikipedia) See Page 166 in Frank. Discussion Questions: 1. The autobiography opens with Barney noting a dramatic turnabout from 1954 to 2014. Government went from high esteem to low esteem; gay rights went in the reverse order. Do you agree or not? Why? 2. Could the same observation apply to Jewish politicians? 3. -
STONEWALL Riotsstro
Everyday hero. Ordinary world. Compelling villain. Call to adventure. Crossing the threshold. STONEWALL RIOTS STONEWALL strongerstories.org Allies, mentors and gifts. Three challenges. Better world. Everyday hero. Ordinary world. Compelling villain. Call to adventure. Crossing the threshold. The Stonewall Inn The 1960s were difficult Thanks to activists Raid: 1:20 a.m. Procedure was to line up community – an important for LGBTQ+ Americans. alcohol regulations were 28/06/1969, 6 policemen, the patrons, check their Greenwich Village Solicitation of same-sex overturned. But engaging 1 detective and 1 ID, and have police institution. The relations was illegal in in homosexual behaviour inspector arrived yelling officers take customers Stonewall Inn was large, New York, and there was in public (holding "Police! We're taking the to the toilet to verify RIOTS STONEWALL cheap to enter, welcomed a criminal statute that hands, kissing, dancing) place!” Stonewall their sex. That night Drag Queens (others allowed police to arrest was still illegal, so employees do not recall customers refused to go usually didn't) and it people wearing less than police harassment being tipped off that a with the officers. Stormé was a nightly home for three gender-appropriate continued. Rampant raid was to occur, as was DeLarverie fought back many runaway homeless clothes. The State institutionalised the custom. The music was against the police LGBTQ+ youths. It was Liquor Authority homophobia and turned off and the lights officer who attempted to one of the few - if not penalised and shut down transphobia – the turned on, and the police arrest her. She shouted the only – LGBTQ+ bar establishments that Stonewall Riots specific barricaded the doors. -
Gwendolyn Whiteside …………………………………………………………...…..Page 4
BACKSTAGE A publication of COMMUNITY SERVICE at AMERICAN BLUES THEATER THE COLUMNIST BACKSTAGE GUIDE 1 BACKSTAGE THE COLUMNIST By David Auburn Directed by Keira Fromm FEATURING Philip Earl Johnson Kymberly Mellen Coburn Goss Ian Paul Custer* Tyler Meredith Christopher Sheard From the Pulitzer and Tony Award-winning author of Proof, The Columnist is a drama about power, the press, sex, and betrayal. At the height of the Cold War, Joe Alsop is the nation’s most influential journalist—beloved, feared, and courted by the Washington world. But as the 1960s dawn and America undergoes dizzying change, the intense political dramas Joe is embroiled in become deeply personal as well. “Gripping and moving” – Variety * Ensemble member of American Blues Theater 2 AMERICAN BLUES THEATER TABLE OF CONTENTS Note from Producing Artistic Director Gwendolyn Whiteside …………………………………………………………...…..Page 4 About Playwright David Auburn..................................................................................................................Page 5 Interview with Playwright David Auburn........................………………….……………………………………………..........Page 6 The Backstory with Actor Ian Paul Custer....……....…………………………....…………………....................................Page 7 About David Halberstam.................................................…………………………………………….………………...……....Page 7 Interview with Actors Philip Earl Johnson and Kymberly Mellen…………………………………………................Pages 8-9 Interview with Costume Designer Christopher J. Neville......…...….....................................................Pages -
The Stonewall Riots 2/5/16 10:34 PM Page Iii DM - the Stonewall Riots 2/5/16 10:34 PM Page V
DM - The Stonewall Riots 2/5/16 10:34 PM Page iii DM - The Stonewall Riots 2/5/16 10:34 PM Page v Table of Contents Preface . vii How to Use This Book . xi Research Topics for Defining Moments: The Stonewall Riots . xiii NARRATIVE OVERVIEW Prologue . 3 Chapter 1: Homophobia and Discrimination . 9 Chapter 2: The LGBT Experience in New York City . 23 Chapter 3: Raid on the Stonewall Inn . 37 Chapter 4: Growth of the LGBT Rights Movement . 53 Chapter 5: The AIDS Crisis and the Struggle for Acceptance . 65 Chapter 6: Progress in the Courts . 79 Chapter 7: Legacy of the Stonewall Riots . 95 BIOGRAPHIES Marsha P. Johnson (1945–1992) . 107 Stonewall Riot Participant and Transgender Rights Activist Frank Kameny (1925–2011) . 111 Father of the LGBT Rights Movement Dick Leitsch (1935–) . 116 LGBT Rights Activist and New York Mattachine Society Leader v DM - The Stonewall Riots 2/9/16 2:06 PM Page vi Defining Moments: The Stonewall Riots Seymour Pine (1919–2010) . 120 New York Police Inspector Who Led the Stonewall Inn Raid Sylvia Rivera (1951–2002) . 123 Stonewall Riot Participant and Transgender Rights Activist Craig Rodwell (1940–1993) . 127 Bookstore Owner, Activist, and Stonewall Riot Participant Martha Shelley (1943–) . 131 LGBT Rights Activist and Witness to the Stonewall Riots Howard Smith (1936–2014) . 135 Journalist Who Reported from Inside the Stonewall Inn PRIMARY SOURCES A Medical Journal Exhibits Homophobia . 141 The Kinsey Report Explodes Myths about Homosexuality . 143 Lucian Truscott Covers the Stonewall Riots . 149 Howard Smith Reports from Inside the Bar . 154 Media Coverage Angers LGBT Activists . -
LGBTQ+ Nondiscrimination Laws in Kentucky
University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-2017 LGBTQ+ nondiscrimination laws in Kentucky. Christopher M Wales University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the American Politics Commons, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Studies Commons, Other Legal Studies Commons, Public Policy Commons, Social Policy Commons, and the Urban Studies Commons Recommended Citation Wales, Christopher M, "LGBTQ+ nondiscrimination laws in Kentucky." (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2874. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/2874 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LGBTQ+ NONDISCRIMINATION LAWS IN KENTUCKY By Christopher Michael Wales B.A. Northern Kentucky University, 2014 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Public Administration Department of Public Administration University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky December 2017 LGBTQ+ NONDISCRIMINATION LAWS IN KENTUCKY By Christopher Michael Wales B.A. Northern Kentucky University, 2014 A Thesis Approved on November 16, 2017 by the following Thesis Committee: Dr. Janet Kelly, Chair Dr. Matthew Ruther Dr. Catherine Fosl ii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to Carrie Donald, who inspired and encouraged me to pursue social justice, and whose guidance will be greatly missed. -
From Criminal to Citizen: How the Evolution of Public Opinion Won Gay Marriage in the Courtroom
From Criminal to Citizen: How The Evolution of Public Opinion Won Gay Marriage In The Courtroom Sabrina Singer Senior Thesis Department of History Barnard College, Columbia University Advisor: Robert McCaughey Singer 1 Prologue A warm tropical breeze brushed my face as I stood in the Miami Beach Botanical Gardens waiting for the mayor to begin. The crowd murmured with excitement, looking around at each other with anticipation as the sun set behind the palm trees. I glanced over at the couple I had met earlier in the evening. They were dressed in matching tuxedos, holding hands, waiting. The drag queen next to me shifted her weight back and forth, impatient. Then, finally, the speeches were over and the ceremonies could begin. The judge had only lifted the stay on gay marriage in the early hours of the morning, yet hundreds of gay couples lined-up to walk down the makeshift aisle to the hastily constructed altar to be married by the mayor. Dressed in suits, biking clothes, jean shorts, and bathing suits, couple after couple affirmed their love and commitment. Same-sex marriage had come to Florida. I had witnessed similar jubilation in front of the U.S. Supreme Court building two summers prior when the Court issued its momentous ruling in United States vs. Windsor, overturning the Defense of Marriage Act that had prevented the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriage. Beholding the relief and joy on the faces of the people swarming the steps of the Supreme Court building, I knew that I had chosen the right issue to believe in. -
Glenda Russell & Renee Morgan
OUT OF THE SHADOWS: 1969 A Timeline of Boulder LGBT History Since the Stonewall riots in 1969, the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people BOULDER have been advanced in many ways and in places small and large. Much is known about the struggle and advances in LGBT rights that have taken place on national and state stages. Much less is known about the path toward equal rights for LGBT people in Boulder. This is Boulder’s story. COLORADO Compiled by Glenda Russell & Renee Morgan Sponsored by Designed by 1969 NYC Stonewall Riots NATIONAL 1970s 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1974 1970 1978 Referendum: Boulder Gay Liberation Lesbian Caucus and Sexual Orientation Front is formed at CU Boulder Gay Liberation is removed from create stir with Boulder’s Human Gay Blue Jeans Day Rights Ordinance Recall election: Tim Fuller is recalled and Pen Tate barely survives recall effort Same-sex couples are ejected from down- 1976 town bars for dancing Gay and Lesbian together; protests follow class is taught Monthly dances at Jack Kerouac School at CU Hidden Valley Ranch Maven Productions of Disembodied draw hundreds produces its first Poetics is formed at concert, Cris Naropa Institute Williamson at Tulagi’ 1979 After evicting same-sex couples dancing, Isa- dora’s picketed; their sign zapped 1971 Boulder Gay Liberation Front publishes first issue of monthly newsletter, Gayly Planet 1973 Boulder City Council adopts Human Rights Ordinance, including sexual orientation 1975 Boulder County Clerk 1972 Clela Rorex grants Boulder -
Something Changed: the Social and Legal Status of Homosexuality in America As Reported by the New York Times Lauren Berard
Florida State University Libraries Honors Theses The Division of Undergraduate Studies 2014 Something Changed: The Social and Legal Status of Homosexuality in America as Reported by the New York Times Lauren Berard Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] 1 Abstract: (homosexual, law, culture) Homosexuality, though proven to be a naturally occurring phenomenon, has been a recurring subject of controversy: for years, homosexuality was classified as a disease, labeling gay citizen as sick at best, perverts at worst. As recently as fifty years ago, seen the best reception an active homosexual could hope for was to be seen as having a terrible affliction which must be cured. Gay citizens were treated as second-class citizens, with every aspect of their lifestyles condemned by society and the government. This thesis is a history of the changing social and legal status of homosexuality in the United States, from the 1920's. Something certainly has changed, in law and society, and I propose to explore the change and to explain why and how it happened. 2 THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF CRIMINOLOGY & CRIMINAL JUSTICE SOMETHING CHANGED: THE SOCIAL AND LEGAL STATUS OF HOMOSEXUALITY IN AMERICA AS REPORTED BY THE NEW YORK TIMES By LAUREN BERARD A thesis submitted to the Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice Theses and Dissertations In partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with Honors in the Major Degree Awarded: Spring, 2014 3 The members of the Defense Committee approve the thesis of Lauren Berard defended on May 2, 2014. -
Religion and Lgbtq People in Us History
Published online 2016 www.nps.gov/subjects/tellingallamericansstories/lgbtqthemestudy.htm LGBTQ America: A Theme Study of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer History is a publication of the National Park Foundation and the National Park Service. We are very grateful for the generous support of the Gill Foundation, which has made this publication possible. The views and conclusions contained in the essays are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government. © 2016 National Park Foundation Washington, DC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted or reproduced without permission from the publishers. Links (URLs) to websites referenced in this document were accurate at the time of publication. THEMES The chapters in this section take themes as their starting points. They explore different aspects of LGBTQ history and heritage, tying them to specific places across the country. They include examinations of LGBTQ community, civil rights, the law, health, art and artists, commerce, the military, sports and leisure, and sex, love, and relationships. STRUGGLES21 IN BODY AND SPIRIT: RELIGION AND LGBTQ PEOPLE IN US HISTORY Drew Bourn Introduction The Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. once observed that eleven o'clock on Sunday morning is the most segregated hour in the United States.1 But segregation goes beyond a separation between black churches and white churches. There is a tremendous variety of religious communities in the US - Hindus, Muslims, Jews, Christians, Buddhists, Pagans, and others. -
What Is Sexual Orientation? Mary Ziegler Florida State University College of Law
Kentucky Law Journal Volume 106 | Issue 1 Article 6 2018 What is Sexual Orientation? Mary Ziegler Florida State University College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Sexuality and the Law Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Ziegler, Mary (2018) "What is Sexual Orientation?," Kentucky Law Journal: Vol. 106 : Iss. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj/vol106/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Law Journal by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. What is Sexual Orientation? Mary ZieglerI ABSTRACT At a time when the Supreme Court seems closer than ever before to treating sexual orientation as a suspect classification, consideration of the legal definition of sexual orientation is both timely and important. The Court’s 2015 decision in Obergefell recognizes two guideposts for defining sexual orientation: its immutability and normalcy. While other scholars offer rich and nuanced accounts of the fight for gay, lesbian, transgender, and bisexual rights, they do not fully analyze the history of sexual orientation as a legal category. This Article closes that gap, illuminating the hidden costs of the definition of sexual orientation that Obergefell endorses. In the past, definitions of sexual orientation based on immutability helped courts turn away equal protection arguments because of the “real” biological differences between same-sex and opposite sex couples. -
Sexual Orientation and the Federal Workplace
SEXUAL ORIENTATION and the FEDERAL WORKPLACE Policy and Perception A Report to the President and Congress of the United States by the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board MAY 2014 THE CHAIRMAN U.S. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 1615 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20419-0001 The President President of the Senate Speaker of the House of Representatives Dear Sirs: In accordance with the requirements of 5 U.S.C. § 1204(a)(3), it is my honor to submit this U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) report, Sexual Orientation and the Federal Workplace: Policy and Perception. The purpose of our study was to examine Federal employee perceptions of workplace treatment based on sexual orientation, review how Federal workplace protections from sexual orientation discrimination evolved, and determine if further action is warranted to communicate or clarify those protections. Since 1980, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management has interpreted the tenth Prohibited Personnel Practice (5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(10)), which bars discrimination in Federal personnel actions based on conduct that does not adversely affect job performance, to prohibit sexual orientation discrimination. As this prohibition has neither been specifically expressed in statute nor affirmed in judicial decision, it has been subject to alternate interpretations. Executive Order 13087 prohibited sexual orientation discrimination in Federal employment but provided no enforceable rights or remedies for Federal employees who allege they are the victims of sexual orientation discrimination. Any ambiguity in the longstanding policy prohibiting sexual orientation discrimination in the Federal workplace would be resolved by legislation making that prohibition explicit. Such legislation could grant Federal employees who allege they are victims of sexual orientation discrimination access to the same remedies as those who allege discrimination on other bases.