Mazepa's Ukraine: Understanding Cossack Territorial Vistas Author(S): Zenon E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mazepa's Ukraine: Understanding Cossack Territorial Vistas Author(S): Zenon E The President and Fellows of Harvard College Mazepa's Ukraine: Understanding Cossack Territorial Vistas Author(s): Zenon E. Kohut Source: Harvard Ukrainian Studies, Vol. 31, No. 1/4, POLTAVA 1709: THE BATTLE AND THE MYTH (2009-2010), pp. 1-28 Published by: Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41756495 . Accessed: 01/06/2014 01:47 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute and The President and Fellows of Harvard College are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Harvard Ukrainian Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 80.7.236.84 on Sun, 1 Jun 2014 01:47:42 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Mazepa's Ukraine: Understanding Cossack Territorial Vistas Zenon E. Kohuť According to PylypOrlyk, HetmánIvan Mazepa offeredthis explanation whenhe switchedhis allegiancefrom Peter I to CharlesXII ofSweden: Andbecause this [matter] could no longerbe hiddenfrom you I attest beforeGod, for Whom there are no secrets,and swear that I wantto do thiswith God's help not for my own benefit, not for greater privileges, not forgreater enrichment, and not for any other desires, but for the sake of allof you, who remain under my authority and leadership, for your wives andchildren, for the common good of our mother my fatherland poor Ukraine,for all ofthe Zaporozhian Host and the Little Rossian nation, forthe elevation and expansion of the Host's rights and privileges, I want todo thiswith God's help so thatyou, with [your] wives and children and theFatherland with the Zaporozhian Host, would not perish because of theSwedish or Muscovite side.1 Thejustification for altering the hetman's political course contains references to "poor" motherUkraine, the fatherland,the Zaporozhian Host, and the "LittleRossian" nation- conceptsthat by the time of Ivan Mazepa had become an integralpart of Ukrainianpolitical thought. But whatvision did Mazepa evokewhen he referredto Ukraine,the fatherland,the LittleRossian nation, and theZaporozhian Host? What territories were envisioned by these terms? Eventhough various aspects of Ukrainian political culture have been studied, theterritorial dimension has been poorlyunderstood. This study attempts to establishhow a territorialvision of Ukraineevolved from the establishment of the Hetmanatein 1649 by HetmánBohdan Khmel'nyts'kyito the end of therule of Hetmán Ivan Samoilovychand theassumption of the hetmancy by Ivan Mazepa in 1687. This content downloaded from 80.7.236.84 on Sun, 1 Jun 2014 01:47:42 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 2 KOHUŤ i. Ruthenian Regionalism and Identity Prior to Bohdan Khmel'nyts'kyi Conceptsof a Ukrainianterritorial entity and ofa Rutheniannation had been wellestablished long before the 1648 revolt. They began to evolvesoon afterthe Union ofLublin (1569). At thattime, three Ruthenian palatinates- Volhynia, Bratslav,and Kyiv-were transferred from the GrandDuchy of Lithuaniato the Kingdomof Poland.By the 1580sa regionalRuthenian political identity began to emerge,based on the threenewly incorporated palatinates and the Rus' (Galicia) and Podilliapalatinates that had longbeen partof Poland.For example,King Stephen Báthory addressed the "lords and knightsresiding in the Rus',Kyiv, Bratslav, and VolhynianUkraine."2 Toward the end ofthe sixteenth centuryan evolvinggenealogical program for the Princes Ostroz'kyi attempted to linkthem with the "princesof Old Rus'" and the "land of Rus'."This land provedto be theRuthenian territories of the Kingdom of Poland: Galician Rus', Volhynia,the Kyiv region, and Podillia.3 By the seventeenthcentury this growing political territorial identity was accompaniedby the articulation of the concept of a Rutheniannation ( naroď) as an equal partnerof the Polish and Lithuaniannations.4 This argument was also based on thealleged rights guaranteed at thetime of their incorporation intoPoland. For example, in theJustification ofInnocence (1623; attributed to MeletiiSmotryts'kyi), the author argues: For thoseabove-mentioned honorable deeds and audaciousacts of couragethat the noble Ruthenian nation rendered to theGrand Dukes, theirLords, [and] Their Majesties the Kings of Poland, it has been given thefreedom by them to sitin senatorialdignity equally with the two, Polishand Lithuanian,nations, to givecounsel concerning the good oftheir states and theirown fatherland, and to enjoyall thedignities, prerogatives,the call to offices,freedoms, rights, and libertiesof the Kingdomof Poland. This was given to it as equalto equal and free [nation] tofree Polish nation, united and incorporated injoint honor and unity of corporatebody: to princesand nobles, the nobility and knighthood, the clericaland lay estates. At the same time, the people of urban condition ofthat nation were also immediatelygiven their rights and liberties [in return]for their faithful submission and true benevolence.5 The issue ofterritorial identity and territorial-nationalrights based on the 1569incorporation is wellillustrated by Adam Kysil's presentation of the nobil- ity'sgrievances at the Sejm (Diet) of 1641.Kysil' equated thefour palatinates ofVolhynia, Bratslav, Kyiv, and Chernihivas Rus',considering them as a single territorialunit with rights and privilegesstemming from their incorporation This content downloaded from 80.7.236.84 on Sun, 1 Jun 2014 01:47:42 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions MAZEPA'SUKRAINE 3 intothe Kingdom of Poland (the Chernihiv palatinate was createdin 1635from lands won fromMuscovy, and was giventhe same statusas the territories thatwere incorporatedin 1569).6Kysil's vision, therefore, does not include thenon-incorporated Rus' (Galicia), Beiz, and Podilliapalatinates. Neverthe- less, the persecutionof the OrthodoxChurch and populationanywhere in theCommonwealth was considereda violationof the rights of the Orthodox nobilityin theincorporated territories.7 Similarly, the violation of the rights of thenon-noble strata of the "Ruthenian nation" was a violationof the rights of theOrthodox nobility of the incorporated territories. Thus, Kysil' viewed the "Rutheniannation" as a communitycomposed of a numberof orders. 2. Cossack Ukraine and the Ruthenian Nation These conceptswere very much presentduring the greatCossack revoltin the Polish-LithuanianCommonwealth. As a resultof the uprising,Hetmán Bohdan Khmelnyts'kyicleared much of Ukraineof Polishrule, and by late 1648 he had reachedthe Polish-Ukrainianethnic border and stoppedthere. The hetmánreturned to Kyivwhere he arrangeda triumphalentry for himself intothe city. Khmelnyts'kyi was greetedby the Patriarch of Jerusalem, Paisios, and the Kyivanmetropolitan, Syl'vestr Kosiv, with the honorifictitle "Most IllustriousRuler," or illustrissimusprinceps . The Kyivan academy called Hetmán Khmelnyts'kyi"Moses, savior, redeemer, and liberatorof the Ruthenian nation fromthe slavery of the Liakhs [Poles]."8 Soon Khmelnyts'kyihimself began to reiteratethe idea ofcomplete Ruthe- nianliberation. In discussionswith Polish envoys in Februaryof 1649 he defined whichterritories he had in mind: I shallfight to free the whole Ruthenian nation from bondage! ...I willnot crossthe border to wage war! I willnot raise my sword against the Turks andTatars! I have enough now in Ukraine [Kyiv palatinate], Podillia, and Volhynia-there is nowenough time, wealth, and provisions in myland and principality- all theway to Lviv,Kholm, and Galicia.And when I standon theVistula, I shallsay to theLiakhs beyond it: sit still and be quiet,Liakhs!9 Whatwas HetmánBohdan Khmel'nyts'kyi's vision of the territorial extent of his politicalentity and theRuthenian nation? It was limitedto theRuthenian palatinatesof the Kingdomof Poland. In 1649 Khmelnyts'kyipursued his Ruthenianproject with great enthusiasm. In Februaryhe toldthe senior Ortho- dox noblemannegotiating on behalfof Poland, Adam Kysil',and his familyto "renouncethe Liakhsand join the Cossacks,for the Liakhland will perish, This content downloaded from 80.7.236.84 on Sun, 1 Jun 2014 01:47:42 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 4 KOHUŤ butall theRus' willrule - thisvery year, very soon"10 However, as theresult of betrayalby his Tatarallies, only six monthslater Khmelnyts'kyi had to settle forfar less than "all the Rus'." According to theZbořiv Agreement between the Cossacks and the Commonwealth,the Cossack lands (i.e.,accepted into the Cossack register)included the Kyiv,Chernihiv, and Bratslavpalatinates, but not Volhyniaand certainlynot Galicia- a modifiedversion of the territories thatwere incorporated in 1569.The boundarieswere defined as follows: Beginningfrom the Dnieper on this side [the Right Bank of the Dnieper- ZK] in Dymer,Hornostaipil, Korostyshiv, Pavoloch, Pohrebyshche, Pryluka[Stara Pryluka], Vinnytsia, and Bratslav,and fromBratslav to Iampilas faras theDnister, and fromthe Dnister to theDnieper... and on the otherside [theLeft Bank of the Dnieper-ZK] in Oster, Chernihiv,Romen, and Nizhen, all the way to the Muscovite border and theDnieper.11 Since the ZbořivAgreement defined
Recommended publications
  • VYTAUTAS MAGNUS UNIVERSITY Tetiana Kucher STRUCTURAL
    VYTAUTAS MAGNUS UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF NATURAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY Tetiana Kucher STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL OPTIMIZATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL NETWORK OF THE VINNYTSIA REGION Master Thesis Study Programme Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, state code 6211DX012 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Algimantas Paulauskas _________ ______ (signature) (date) Defended: Dean of the Faculty Natural Sciences Prof. Dr. Saulius Mickevicius_________ ______ (signature) (date) KAUNAS, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………………………….....3 SANTRAUKA…………………………………………………………………………………….4 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS……………………………………………………………………..5 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………………6 1. LITERATURE REVIEW……………………………………………………………………...8 1.1. Basic establishment principles of the ecological network………………………………...8 1.1.1 Organizing the establishment of an ecological network at European level…...……..8 1.1.1.1 Global international agreements (conventions)………………………….....8 1.1.1.2 Pan-European international agreements…………………………………..10 1.1.2 Legal support the formation in the Ukrainian ecological network…..………….....12 1.1.3 Scientific and methodological support in the formation of an ecological network………………………………………………………………….………………...16 1.1.3.1 Scientific and methodological principles of creating an ecological network…………………………………………………………………………....16 1.1.3.2 Scientific developments to ensure the formation of an ecological network……………………………………………………………………………17 1.1.4 Structural elements of the national ecological network…………..……………..….19 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS……………………………………………………………..23
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin Struggle for Independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Electronic Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Major Papers 1-1-1967 The role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin struggle for independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649. Andrew B. Pernal University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd Recommended Citation Pernal, Andrew B., "The role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin struggle for independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649." (1967). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 6490. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/6490 This online database contains the full-text of PhD dissertations and Masters’ theses of University of Windsor students from 1954 forward. These documents are made available for personal study and research purposes only, in accordance with the Canadian Copyright Act and the Creative Commons license—CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative Works). Under this license, works must always be attributed to the copyright holder (original author), cannot be used for any commercial purposes, and may not be altered. Any other use would require the permission of the copyright holder. Students may inquire about withdrawing their dissertation and/or thesis from this database. For additional inquiries, please contact the repository administrator via email ([email protected]) or by telephone at 519-253-3000ext. 3208. THE ROLE OF BOHDAN KHMELNYTSKYI AND OF THE KOZAKS IN THE RUSIN STRUGGLE FOR INDEPENDENCE FROM THE POLISH-LI'THUANIAN COMMONWEALTH: 1648-1649 by A ‘n d r e w B. Pernal, B. A. A Thesis Submitted to the Department of History of the University of Windsor in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Faculty of Graduate Studies 1967 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annals of UVAN, Vol . V-VI, 1957, No. 4 (18)
    THE ANNALS of the UKRAINIAN ACADEMY of Arts and Sciences in the U. S. V o l . V-VI 1957 No. 4 (18) -1, 2 (19-20) Special Issue A SURVEY OF UKRAINIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY by Dmytro Doroshenko Ukrainian Historiography 1917-1956 by Olexander Ohloblyn Published by THE UKRAINIAN ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES IN THE U.S., Inc. New York 1957 EDITORIAL COMMITTEE DMITRY CIZEVSKY Heidelberg University OLEKSANDER GRANOVSKY University of Minnesota ROMAN SMAL STOCKI Marquette University VOLODYMYR P. TIM OSHENKO Stanford University EDITOR MICHAEL VETUKHIV Columbia University The Annals of the Ukrainian Academy of Arts and Sciences in the U. S. are published quarterly by the Ukrainian Academy of Arts and Sciences in the U.S., Inc. A Special issue will take place of 2 issues. All correspondence, orders, and remittances should be sent to The Annals of the Ukrainian Academy of Arts and Sciences in the U. S. ПУ2 W est 26th Street, New York 10, N . Y. PRICE OF THIS ISSUE: $6.00 ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION PRICE: $6.00 A special rate is offered to libraries and graduate and undergraduate students in the fields of Slavic studies. Copyright 1957, by the Ukrainian Academy of Arts and Sciences in the U.S.} Inc. THE ANNALS OF THE UKRAINIAN ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES IN THE U.S., INC. S p e c i a l I s s u e CONTENTS Page P r e f a c e .......................................................................................... 9 A SURVEY OF UKRAINIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY by Dmytro Doroshenko In tr o d u c tio n ...............................................................................13 Ukrainian Chronicles; Chronicles from XI-XIII Centuries 21 “Lithuanian” or West Rus’ C h ro n ic le s................................31 Synodyky or Pom yannyky..........................................................34 National Movement in XVI-XVII Centuries and the Revival of Historical Tradition in Literature .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Perception of Local Geographical Specificity by the Population of Podolia
    88 ЕКОНОМІЧНА ТА СОЦІАЛЬНА ГЕОГРАФІЯ PERCEPTION OF LOCAL GEOGRAPHICAL SPECIFICITY BY THE POPULATION OF PODOLIA Oleksiy GNATIUK Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine [email protected] Abstract: The article reveals the perception of local geographical specificity by the population of Podolia. Attention is focused on five elements of the local geographical specificity: natural, historical and cultural monuments; prominent personalities; trademarks and producers of goods and services; the origin settlement names; figurative poetic names of settlements. The tasks were the following: to determine basic qualitative and quantitative parameters of regional image-geographical systems, to find the main regularities of their spatial organization, and, finally, to classify administrative-territorial units of the region according to the basic properties of image-geographic systems using specially worked out method. Analysis made it clear that the population of Podolia is characterized by a high level of reflection of the local geographic specificity. Local image-geographical systems from different parts of the region have different structure and level of development. In particular, image-geographical systems in Vinnytsia and Ternopil oblasts are well developed, stable and hierarchized, in Khmelnitskyi oblast it is just developing, dynamic and so quite unstable. To further disclosure the regularities and patterns of local geographical specificity perception, it is advisable to carry out case studies of image-geographic systems at the level of individual settlements. Key words: territorial identity, local geographical specificity, geographic image UDC: 911.3 СПРИЙНЯТТЯ МІСЦЕВОЇ ГЕОГРАФІЧНОЇ СПЕЦИФІКИ НАСЕЛЕННЯМ ПОДІЛЛЯ Олексій ГНАТЮК Київський національний університет імені Тараса Шевченка, Україна [email protected] Анотація: У статті розглянуто сприйняття місцевої географічної специфіки населенням Подільського регіону.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine
    Syracuse University SURFACE Religion College of Arts and Sciences 2005 Jewish Cemetries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine Samuel D. Gruber United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/rel Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Gruber, Samuel D., "Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine" (2005). Full list of publications from School of Architecture. Paper 94. http://surface.syr.edu/arc/94 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Religion by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel
    [Show full text]
  • Kostya Tszyu
    We have only fresh and savory news! April 2013 No. 4 (115) DoN’t Miss it! BiRtHDAYs April 3 – 10-year anniversary of Korchma on Velozavodskaya street April 19 – 1-year anniversary to Korchma in Kyiv More news and photos at www.tarasbulba.ru e U v o [email protected] k l r h Project manager – Yuri Beloyvan a t in i [email protected] i w an e Hotline: 8(495) 780 7744 c ad uisine – m DISCOVERY OF THE AMERICAS: Korchma Taras Bulba in New York KYIV-PECHERSK LAVRA Mysteries of underground labyrinths TRIDENT AND OSELEDETS KOSTYA TSZYU The Arian roots of Ukrainian symbols EVERYTHINg IS UNDER CONTROL Wi-Fi available all through KORCHMA Delivery of Ukrainian home cookeD meals Around-the-clock! www.tarasbulba.ru 8 (495) 780-77-44 6+ 2 | Guest KOSTYA TSZYU: SECRETS OF THE CHAMPION Text: Anna Lyakhu, Stepan Gritsuk Photo: Yuri Gelitovitch is it easy beinG a champion? how can one maintain one’s intellect when one is hit on the head every day? who can take the crown away from klitschko? world champion and holder of many titles, Great russian boxer kostya TSZyu has told bulba news about the secrets of his vistories, about controlled aGGression and about his love for ukraine and ukrainian cuisine. You are a very strong and successful man. Is it not boys I work with current- hard being always the first, the champion? ly, Sasha Povetkin and First of all, being a champion is a hard work. There- Denis Lebedev. They are fore, if you are a champion today, tomorrow you do world champions, but it not have to choose being a champion or not.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES For map and other editors For international use Ukraine Kyiv “Kartographia” 2011 TOPONYMIC GUIDELINES FOR MAP AND OTHER EDITORS, FOR INTERNATIONAL USE UKRAINE State Service of Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre State Scientific Production Enterprise “Kartographia” ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prepared by Nina Syvak, Valerii Ponomarenko, Olha Khodzinska, Iryna Lakeichuk Scientific Consultant Iryna Rudenko Reviewed by Nataliia Kizilowa Translated by Olha Khodzinska Editor Lesia Veklych ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ © Kartographia, 2011 ISBN 978-966-475-839-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................ 5 2 The Ukrainian Language............................................ 5 2.1 General Remarks.............................................. 5 2.2 The Ukrainian Alphabet and Romanization of the Ukrainian Alphabet ............................... 6 2.3 Pronunciation of Ukrainian Geographical Names............................................................... 9 2.4 Stress .............................................................. 11 3 Spelling Rules for the Ukrainian Geographical Names....................................................................... 11 4 Spelling of Generic Terms ....................................... 13 5 Place Names in Minority Languages
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine and Russia in Their Historical Encounter
    Hans-Joachim Torke The Unloved Alliance: Political Relations between Muscovy and Ukraine in the Seventeenth Century The manifold relations between Russia and Ukraine in the seventeenth cen¬ tury were played out on at least three levels: official relations on the political, diplomatic and military level; semi-official relations in the ecclesiastical- pedagogical and commercial sectors; and unofficial relations concerned with spiritual and cultural influences. Both the latter complexes are related to the first and cannot be disregarded here, although this article focuses on political events and on the way in which they were understood by decision-makers. My purpose here is not to employ well-known and frequently consulted sources in order to elicit yet another interpretation of the Pereiaslav Agreement of 1654 or the character of relations between Muscovy and the Hetmanate in the ensuing period. Concerning Pereiaslav, there exist at least seven different interpretations (temporary alliance, personal union, real union, vassalage, protectorate, autonomy and incorporation), and in regard to the second topic, there is also a range of interpretations from full independence to complete in¬ corporation of the Cossack state. No Western scholar has yet written an account that goes beyond O’Brien’s monograph to take in the whole century.1 The question remains whether the period from the first contacts of the Dnieper Cossacks with Muscovy in the sixteenth century to the end of the Great Northern War in 1721, examined as a whole, yields a perspective on Muscovite policy that can be reconciled with the formula “Russian Imperialism from Ivan the Great to the Revolution.”2 It may be recalled that the historical roots of Russian imperialism were discussed in the American Slavic and East European Review in the early 1950s.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Cemeteries, Synagogues, and Mass Grave Sites in Ukraine
    JEWISH CEMETERIES, SYNAGOGUES, AND MASS GRAVE SITES IN UKRAINE United States Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad 2005 UNITED STATES COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD Warren L. Miller, Chairman McLean, VA Members: Ned Bandler August B. Pust Bridgewater, CT Euclid, OH Chaskel Besser Menno Ratzker New York, NY Monsey, NY Amy S. Epstein Harriet Rotter Pinellas Park, FL Bingham Farms, MI Edgar Gluck Lee Seeman Brooklyn, NY Great Neck, NY Phyllis Kaminsky Steven E. Some Potomac, MD Princeton, NJ Zvi Kestenbaum Irving Stolberg Brooklyn, NY New Haven, CT Daniel Lapin Ari Storch Mercer Island, WA Potomac, MD Gary J. Lavine Staff: Fayetteville, NY Jeffrey L. Farrow Michael B. Levy Executive Director Washington, DC Samuel Gruber Rachmiel Liberman Research Director Brookline, MA Katrina A. Krzysztofiak Laura Raybin Miller Program Manager Pembroke Pines, FL Patricia Hoglund Vincent Obsitnik Administrative Officer McLean, VA 888 17th Street, N.W., Suite 1160 Washington, DC 20006 Ph: ( 202) 254-3824 Fax: ( 202) 254-3934 E-mail: [email protected] May 30, 2005 Message from the Chairman One of the principal missions that United States law assigns the Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad is to identify and report on cemeteries, monuments, and historic buildings in Central and Eastern Europe associated with the cultural heritage of U.S. citizens, especially endangered sites. The Congress and the President were prompted to establish the Commission because of the special problem faced by Jewish sites in the region: The communities that had once cared for the properties were annihilated during the Holocaust.
    [Show full text]
  • Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500-1700
    Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500–1700 In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries Muscovy waged a costly struggle against the Crimean Khanate, the Ottoman Empire, and the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth for control of the fertile steppe above the Black Sea. This was a region of great strategic and economic importance – arguably the pivot of Eurasia at the time. Yet, this crucial period in Russia’s history has, up until now, been neglected by historians. Brian L. Davies’s study provides an essential insight into the emergence of Russia as a great power. The long campaign took a great toll upon Russia’s population, economy, and institutions, and repeatedly frustrated or redefi ned Russian military and diplo- matic projects in the West. The struggle was every bit as important as Russia’s wars in northern and central Europe for driving the Russian state-building process, forcing military reform and shaping Russia’s visions of Empire. Warfare, State and Society on the Black Sea Steppe, 1500–1700 examines the course of this struggle and explains how Russia’s ultimate prevalence resulted from new strategies of military colonization in addition to improvements in army command-and-control, logistics, and tactics. Brian L. Davies is Associate Professor of History at the University of Texas at San Antonio. His publications include State Power and Community in Early Modern Russia: The Case of Kozlov, 1635–1649 (2004). Warfare and History General Editor Jeremy Black Professor of History, University of Exeter Air Power in the Age of Total War Modern Chinese Warfare, Warfare in Atlantic Africa, 1500– John Buckley 1795–1989 1800: Maritime Confl icts and the Bruce A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cossack Myth: History and Nationhood in the Age of Empires
    THE COSSACK MYTH In the years following the Napoleonic Wars, a mysterious manuscript began to circulate among the dissatisfied noble elite of the Russian Empire. Entitled The History of the Rus′, it became one of the most influential historical texts of the modern era. Attributed to an eighteenth-century Orthodox archbishop, it described the heroic struggles of the Ukrainian Cossacks. Alexander Pushkin read the book as a manifestation of Russian national spirit, but Taras Shevchenko interpreted it as a quest for Ukrainian national liberation, and it would inspire thousands of Ukrainians to fight for the freedom of their homeland. Serhii Plokhy tells the fascinating story of the text’s discovery and dissemination, unravelling the mystery of its authorship and tracing its subsequent impact on Russian and Ukrainian historical and literary imagination. In so doing, he brilliantly illuminates the relationship between history, myth, empire, and nationhood, from Napoleonic times to the fall of the Soviet Union. serhii plokhy is the Mykhailo Hrushevsky Professor of Ukrainian History at Harvard University. His previous publications include Ukraine and Russia: Representations of the Past (2008)andThe Origins of the Slavic Nations: Premodern Identities in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus (2006). Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 210.212.129.125 on Sun Dec 23 05:35:34 WET 2012. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ebook.jsf?bid=CBO9781139135399 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2012 new studies in european history Edited by PETER
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of UKRAINE and UKRAINIAN CULTURE Scientific and Methodical Complex for Foreign Students
    Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine Flight Academy of National Aviation University IRYNA ROMANKO HISTORY OF UKRAINE AND UKRAINIAN CULTURE Scientific and Methodical Complex for foreign students Part 3 GUIDELINES FOR SELF-STUDY Kropyvnytskyi 2019 ɍȾɄ 94(477):811.111 R e v i e w e r s: Chornyi Olexandr Vasylovych – the Head of the Department of History of Ukraine of Volodymyr Vynnychenko Central Ukrainian State Pedagogical University, Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate professor. Herasymenko Liudmyla Serhiivna – associate professor of the Department of Foreign Languages of Flight Academy of National Aviation University, Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate professor. ɇɚɜɱɚɥɶɧɨɦɟɬɨɞɢɱɧɢɣɤɨɦɩɥɟɤɫɩɿɞɝɨɬɨɜɥɟɧɨɡɝɿɞɧɨɪɨɛɨɱɨʀɩɪɨɝɪɚɦɢɧɚɜɱɚɥɶɧɨʀɞɢɫɰɢɩɥɿɧɢ "ȱɫɬɨɪɿɹ ɍɤɪɚʀɧɢ ɬɚ ɭɤɪɚʀɧɫɶɤɨʀ ɤɭɥɶɬɭɪɢ" ɞɥɹ ɿɧɨɡɟɦɧɢɯ ɫɬɭɞɟɧɬɿɜ, ɡɚɬɜɟɪɞɠɟɧɨʀ ɧɚ ɡɚɫɿɞɚɧɧɿ ɤɚɮɟɞɪɢ ɩɪɨɮɟɫɿɣɧɨʀ ɩɟɞɚɝɨɝɿɤɢɬɚɫɨɰɿɚɥɶɧɨɝɭɦɚɧɿɬɚɪɧɢɯɧɚɭɤ (ɩɪɨɬɨɤɨɥʋ1 ɜɿɞ 31 ɫɟɪɩɧɹ 2018 ɪɨɤɭ) ɬɚɫɯɜɚɥɟɧɨʀɆɟɬɨɞɢɱɧɢɦɢ ɪɚɞɚɦɢɮɚɤɭɥɶɬɟɬɿɜɦɟɧɟɞɠɦɟɧɬɭ, ɥɶɨɬɧɨʀɟɤɫɩɥɭɚɬɚɰɿʀɬɚɨɛɫɥɭɝɨɜɭɜɚɧɧɹɩɨɜɿɬɪɹɧɨɝɨɪɭɯɭ. ɇɚɜɱɚɥɶɧɢɣ ɩɨɫɿɛɧɢɤ ɡɧɚɣɨɦɢɬɶ ɿɧɨɡɟɦɧɢɯ ɫɬɭɞɟɧɬɿɜ ɡ ɿɫɬɨɪɿɽɸ ɍɤɪɚʀɧɢ, ʀʀ ɛɚɝɚɬɨɸ ɤɭɥɶɬɭɪɨɸ, ɨɯɨɩɥɸɽ ɧɚɣɜɚɠɥɢɜɿɲɿɚɫɩɟɤɬɢ ɭɤɪɚʀɧɫɶɤɨʀɞɟɪɠɚɜɧɨɫɬɿ. ɋɜɿɬɭɤɪɚʀɧɫɶɤɢɯɧɚɰɿɨɧɚɥɶɧɢɯɬɪɚɞɢɰɿɣ ɭɧɿɤɚɥɶɧɢɣ. ɋɬɨɥɿɬɬɹɦɢ ɪɨɡɜɢɜɚɥɚɫɹ ɫɢɫɬɟɦɚ ɪɢɬɭɚɥɿɜ ɿ ɜɿɪɭɜɚɧɶ, ɹɤɿ ɧɚ ɫɭɱɚɫɧɨɦɭ ɟɬɚɩɿ ɧɚɛɭɜɚɸɬɶ ɧɨɜɨʀ ɩɨɩɭɥɹɪɧɨɫɬɿ. Ʉɧɢɝɚ ɪɨɡɩɨɜɿɞɚɽ ɩɪɨ ɤɚɥɟɧɞɚɪɧɿ ɫɜɹɬɚ ɜ ɍɤɪɚʀɧɿ: ɞɟɪɠɚɜɧɿ, ɪɟɥɿɝɿɣɧɿ, ɩɪɨɮɟɫɿɣɧɿ, ɧɚɪɨɞɧɿ, ɚ ɬɚɤɨɠ ɪɿɡɧɿ ɩɚɦ ɹɬɧɿ ɞɚɬɢ. ɍ ɩɨɫɿɛɧɢɤɭ ɩɪɟɞɫɬɚɜɥɟɧɿ ɪɿɡɧɨɦɚɧɿɬɧɿ ɞɚɧɿ ɩɪɨ ɮɥɨɪɭ ɿ ɮɚɭɧɭ ɤɥɿɦɚɬɢɱɧɢɯ
    [Show full text]