Supplemental Table 1 Peer-Reviewed Articles Used to Evaluate the U.S. Restaurant Industry’S Progress to Create Healthy Food

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Supplemental Table 1 Peer-Reviewed Articles Used to Evaluate the U.S. Restaurant Industry’S Progress to Create Healthy Food Supplemental Table 1 Peer-reviewed articles used to evaluate the U.S. restaurant industry’s progress to create healthy food environments for American customers, 1 January 2006–30 January 2017 Lead Author, Year Data collection period Data sources Restaurants sampled Results and (years) Assessment tools Study location outcomes measured Study design 1. PLACE (Improve the ambience or atmosphere to promote healthy restaurant food and beverage offerings) (n=0) No articles identified 2. PROFILE (Restaurants change the nutrient composition to provide food and beverage offerings that promote a healthy diet) (n=25) Auchincloss et al., 2014 [1] 2011 Restaurant websites and print 22 quick-service restaurants The average calorie content of menus (QSRs), fast-casual restaurants à la carte entrees and appetizers Descriptive (FCRs) and full-service was 800 calories and did not Dietary Guidelines for restaurant (FSR) chains meet the healthier criteria for Cross-sectional Americans (DGA) 2010 including: calories 47% of the time. Denny’s Friendly’s About 30% of à la carte entrees IHOP exceeded the daily Pizza Hut recommended values for Applebee’s Neighborhood saturated fat and sodium and Grill & Bar about 20% met the Bertucci’s Italian Restaurant recommended dietary fiber California Pizza Kitchen content. Champps Americana Chili’s Grill & Bar Famous Dave’s Legendary Pit Bar-B-Que Hard Rock Café Houlihan’s LongHorn Steakhouse Olive Garden Red Lobster Ruby Tuesday 1 T.G.I. Friday’s Ted’s Montana Grill The Capital Grille Morton’s and The Steakhouse Ahuja et al., 2015 [2] 2010–2013 What We Eat In America 4 QSR chains including: A total of 88% (29 of 33 (2007-2008) data used the FDA- McDonald’s sampled restaurant foods) Descriptive defined sodium limits and the Burger King exceeded the FDA Healthy Eating Index 2010 Dominos recommendations for “healthy” Cross-sectional “optimal” sodium levels Pizza Hut limits for sodium. Local Chinese restaurants (unidentified) Bauer et al., 2012 [3] 2006–2010 (period of interest) University of Minnesota 8 QSR chains including: General menu, entrée, and although trends in the energy Nutrition Coordinating Center’s McDonald’s beverage median energy content content of meal items were Food and Nutrient Database Burger King did not differ between 2006 and assessed between 1997/1998 Wendy’s 2010, and side-items decreased and 2009/2010 Taco Bell in caloric content. The energy Kentucky Fried Chicken content of condiments and Descriptive Arby’s desserts increased over the Jack in the Box review period. Longitudinal Dairy Queen Bleich et al., 2015 [4] 2012–2013 MenuStat Database 2012–2013 66 restaurant chains Menu items (n= 19,417) offered (not specified) in 2012 or 2013 did not have Descriptive any meaningful calorie- reduction changes. Newly Longitudinal introduced items in 2013 had lower calories (-56) than similar 2012 items. Calorie declines were among new main-course items (-10%, -67 calories), new beverages (-8%, -26 calories) and children’s menu items (-20%, -46 calories). Bleich et al., 2016 [5] 2012–2014 Menustat Database 2012–2014 66 restaurant chains Calories declined in newly (not specified) introduced menu items from Descriptive 2012 to 2013 (-71), and from 2012 to 2014 (-69) (n = 23,066 Longitudinal total menu items). New main- course items decreased by 30 2 calories (from 85 to 55 calories) (2013 to 2015). Although these items decreased in mean calories, they were higher in calories than items offered all three years. Items offered all three years had no significant difference in mean calories. Bruemmer et al., 2012 [6] May–Jun 2009 (pre) Restaurant chain menus and 37 restaurant chains in King Energy contents were lower at May–Jun 2010 (post) websites compared to the DGA County, Washington FSRs (-7%, -73 calories) and 2005 including: LSRs (-3%, -19 calories) from Intervention LSRs (n=26) and FSRs (n=11) 2009 to 2010, However, nutrition targets were exceeded Cross-sectional for calories (56%), saturated fat (77%) and sodium (89%) at all restaurant locations. Dumanovsky et al., 2009 [7] Mar–Jun 2007 Customer receipts and surveys 11 QSR chains in NYC 7,318 customer receipts were including: obtained from 167 FSR Descriptive Restaurant website information McDonald’s locations in NYC between used to obtain caloric content of Burger King lunch hours of 12 and 2 pm for Cross-sectional meals purchased Wendy’s baseline data prior to the Subway mandatory national restaurant Au Bon Pain menu labeling implementation. KFC Popeye’s Customers purchased an Domino’s average of 827 calories. Papa John’s Excluding single-item Pizza Hut purchases, the average calorie Taco Bell content purchased rose to 961 calories. Chicken LSR chains averaged the highest calories purchased (931 calories), followed by Tex-Mex (Taco Bell; 900 calories), and burger chains (857 calories). One in three customers purchased >1000 calories. 3 Hearst et al., 2013 [8] 2009–2010 (period of interest) University of Minnesota 8 QSR chains including: HEI scores increased in 6 of the although the period of Nutrition Coordinating Center McDonald’s 8 QSR chains but the overall 1997–1998 was assessed Food and Nutrient Database Burger King nutrition quality was still poor Wendy’s in menu offerings. Descriptive Healthy Eating Index (HEI) Taco Bell 2005 KFC Longitudinal Arby’s Jack in the Box Dairy Queen Hill et al., 2013 [9] 2013 Nutrition Environment Measures 137 restaurants in the rural CMA scores were significantly Survey for Restaurants Appalachian region of south lower in African-American Descriptive central Virginia and north block groups than white or Children’s Menu Assessment central North Carolina mixed-race block groups. Cross-sectional (CMA) tool Only 11% (n=15 out of 137 children’s menus) included one or more healthy entrees. Jacobson et al., 2013 [10] 2006-2011 (period of interest) Restaurant website data 16 QSR chains including: The average sodium content of although data assessed from compared to the DGA 2010 Arby’s 78 restaurant foods at 16 QSR 2005–2011 Au Bon Pain chains increased by 2.6% from Blimpie 2005 to 2011. Descriptive Burger King Chick-fil-A Longitudinal Domino’s Pizza Hardee’s Jack in the Box KFC Little Caesars Pizza McDonald’s Panera Bread Papa John’s Pizza Pizza Hut Subway Wendy’s Jarlenski et al., 2016 [11] 2012 to 2014 Menustat Database 2012–2014 37 QSR and FCR chains From 2012 to 2014, only minor (not specified) declines in calorie content (22- 4 Descriptive calorie reduction) was observed among food items across 11,737 Longitudinal menu items assessed for changes in macronutrient composition (non-sugar carbohydrates, sugar, unsaturated fat, saturated fat and protein). Over this time period, beverages revealed an increase by 46 calories, newly introduced main course items reduced by 59 calories, and newly introduced dessert items showed an increase by 90 calories (represented by an increase of 57 calories from added sugar). Kirkpatrick et al., 2013 [12] 2006 Restaurant websites menus 5 QSR chains including: Full menus at QSR chains coded using Food and Nutrient Burger King scored lower than 50/100 points Descriptive Database for Dietary Studies and McDonald’s on the HEI-2005. Children’s MyPyramid Equivalents Subway menus scored 10 points higher Cross-sectional Database Taco Bell on average, and items marketed Wendy’s as healthy or nutritious scored HEI-2005 score 17 points higher compared to full menus. Krukowski et al., 2011 [13] 2009–2010 Restaurant provided children’s 130 local and QSR chains Healthy options were less menu located within 20 miles of prevalent for children’s menus Descriptive Little Rock, Arkansas (13% had a healthy entrée) and Children’s Menu Assessment parents were not provided Cross-sectional tool sufficient information to make healthy menu choices. Moran et al., 2017 [14] 2012–2015 MenuStat Database 45 U.S. restaurant chains From 2012 to 2014, calories in (not specified) including: beverages offered with Descriptive Analysis of children’s menu children’s menus increased items (n=4,016) 26 national significantly by 11 calories. 19 regional From 2012 to 2015, no 23 QSR significant changes were 19 FSR observed for calories in 5 6 FCR beverages, total calories, sodium or saturated fat in children’s menu food offerings. Restaurants that participated in the Kids LiveWell program (n=15) significantly reduced children’s entrée calories between 2012 and 2014 (by 40 calories/meal) compared to non- participating restaurants but this change did not persist for the 2012 to 2015 period. O’Donnell et al., 2008 [15] 2007 USDA database 10 QSR chains in the Houston, Only 3% of possible children’s Nutrient Analysis Protocol from Texas area including: meal combinations met the Descriptive the National School Lunch Arby’s 2007 NSLP nutrient guidelines. Program (NSLP) Burger King Cross-sectional Chick-fil-A KFC McDonald’s Sonic Subway Taco Bell Wendy’s Whataburger Rudelt et al., 2014 [16] 2006-2010 (period of interest) University of Minnesota 8 QSR chains including: Between 2006 and 2010, no although trends in sodium Nutrition Coordinating Center McDonald’s meaningful reduction in mean content were assessed between Food and Nutrient Database Burger King sodium content of the menu 1997/1998 and 2009/2010 Wendy’s offerings (e.g., lunch and dinner Taco Bell entrees and side dishes) was Descriptive KFC observed for the eight QSR Arby’s chains analyzed. Longitudinal Jack in the Box Dairy Queen Schoffman et al., 2016 [17] 2014 MenuStat Database 34 QSR chains including: A total of 3,193 entrées were White Castle analyzed for 34 QSR and 28 Descriptive Krystal FCR chains (total = 62 Subway restaurants). Cross-sectional Wienerschnitzel Taco Bell FCRs provided significantly In-N-Out Burger more calories per entrée (760 6 A&W kcal ± 301 kcal) than QSR Del Taco entrées (561 kcal ± 268). McDonald’s Chick-Fil-A QSRs provided significantly Taco Bueno more entrées in the lower- Arby’s calorie categories (< 500 Taco John’s calories/item) and FCRs Burger King provided more entrées in the Hardee’s higher-calorie categories Wendy’s (> 751 calories/item).
Recommended publications
  • National Chains & Retailers
    National Chains & Retailers - Santee, CA Feb. 2021 Inventory of National Chains- by industry category [169 total] Apparel & Accessories Bus Svcs Supl (cont.) Electronics/Ent. (cont) Hotels & Hosp. Svcs. ▪DSW ▪Postal Annex [2] ▪Cox Communications ▪Best Western ▪Famous Footwear ▪RE/MAX ▪Gamestop ▪Rodeway Inn ▪Old Navy ▪SERVPRO ▪Radio Shack Express ▪WoodSpring Suites [coming] ▪Skechers ▪Sharp Business Syst. ▪T Mobile ▪Tilly's ▪State Farm Insurance ▪uBreakiFix Specialty Retail & Services ▪The UPS Store ▪Verizon ▪Banfield Pet Hosp Automotive ▪Barnes & Noble ▪76 / Conoco Phillips Childcare/Educ. Enrichmt. General Merchandise ▪BevMo ▪Arco ▪KinderCare Learning ▪99¢ Only ▪HobbyTown ▪Auto Zone ▪Mathnasium ▪Costco Wholesale ▪Michael's Arts & Crafts ▪Budget Truck Rental ▪Montessori Charter Sch. ▪Dollar Tree [2] ▪Molly Maid ▪Bumper Doc ▪Tutor Time Learning ▪Kohl's ▪Party City ▪Chevron ▪Ross Stores ▪Pedego Electric Bikes ▪Discount Tire Dining & Food Specialties ▪Target ▪Petco ▪Enterprise Rent-A-Car ▪Baskin Robbins ▪T.J. Maxx ▪PetSmart ▪ExxonMobil ▪Buffalo Wild Wings ▪Walmart ▪Thrive Vet Care ▪Firestone Auto Care ▪Carl's Jr. Restaurant ▪Hertz Rent-A-Car ▪Chick-fil-A Grocers & Pharmacies National Chains ▪O'Reilly Auto Parts ▪Chili's ▪7-Eleven [6] Added Since 2015 - - ▪Penske Truck Rental ▪Chipotle Mexican Grill ▪Circle K ▪Pep Boys ▪Cold Stone Creamery ▪CVS Pharmacy ♦Club Pilates ▪Service King ▪Dairy Queen ▪Food 4 Less/Kroger ♦Eyeglass World ▪Sparks Cmp. Car Care ▪Del Taco ▪Grocery Outlet ♦Lumber Liquidators ▪Tire Choice ▪Denny's Restaurant ▪Smart & Final Extra ♦Grocery Outlet ▪Toyota Certified Center ▪Domino's Pizza ▪Sprouts Market ♦Baskin Robbins ▪U-Haul ▪Einstein Bros. Bagels ▪Vons ♦Movement Mortgage ▪USA Gasoline ▪El Pollo Loco ▪Walgreens ♦CosmoProf ▪Handel's Ice Crm [coming] ♦Smart & Final Extra Banks & Credit Unions ▪In N Out Health & Fitness ♦Keller Williams ▪Bank of America ▪Int.
    [Show full text]
  • National Retailer & Restaurant Expansion Guide Spring 2016
    National Retailer & Restaurant Expansion Guide Spring 2016 Retailer Expansion Guide Spring 2016 National Retailer & Restaurant Expansion Guide Spring 2016 >> CLICK BELOW TO JUMP TO SECTION DISCOUNTER/ APPAREL BEAUTY SUPPLIES DOLLAR STORE OFFICE SUPPLIES SPORTING GOODS SUPERMARKET/ ACTIVE BEVERAGES DRUGSTORE PET/FARM GROCERY/ SPORTSWEAR HYPERMARKET CHILDREN’S BOOKS ENTERTAINMENT RESTAURANT BAKERY/BAGELS/ FINANCIAL FAMILY CARDS/GIFTS BREAKFAST/CAFE/ SERVICES DONUTS MEN’S CELLULAR HEALTH/ COFFEE/TEA FITNESS/NUTRITION SHOES CONSIGNMENT/ HOME RELATED FAST FOOD PAWN/THRIFT SPECIALTY CONSUMER FURNITURE/ FOOD/BEVERAGE ELECTRONICS FURNISHINGS SPECIALTY CONVENIENCE STORE/ FAMILY WOMEN’S GAS STATIONS HARDWARE CRAFTS/HOBBIES/ AUTOMOTIVE JEWELRY WITH LIQUOR TOYS BEAUTY SALONS/ DEPARTMENT MISCELLANEOUS SPAS STORE RETAIL 2 Retailer Expansion Guide Spring 2016 APPAREL: ACTIVE SPORTSWEAR 2016 2017 CURRENT PROJECTED PROJECTED MINMUM MAXIMUM RETAILER STORES STORES IN STORES IN SQUARE SQUARE SUMMARY OF EXPANSION 12 MONTHS 12 MONTHS FEET FEET Athleta 46 23 46 4,000 5,000 Nationally Bikini Village 51 2 4 1,400 1,600 Nationally Billabong 29 5 10 2,500 3,500 West Body & beach 10 1 2 1,300 1,800 Nationally Champs Sports 536 1 2 2,500 5,400 Nationally Change of Scandinavia 15 1 2 1,200 1,800 Nationally City Gear 130 15 15 4,000 5,000 Midwest, South D-TOX.com 7 2 4 1,200 1,700 Nationally Empire 8 2 4 8,000 10,000 Nationally Everything But Water 72 2 4 1,000 5,000 Nationally Free People 86 1 2 2,500 3,000 Nationally Fresh Produce Sportswear 37 5 10 2,000 3,000 CA
    [Show full text]
  • Restaurant Market Potential
    Restaurant Market Potential Independence, KY Prepared by Esri Demographic Summary 2020 2025 Population 27,654 28,708 Population 18+ 19,858 20,435 Households 9,323 9,648 Median Household Income $78,090 $83,353 Expected Number Product/Consumer Behavior Adults Percent MPI Went to family restaurant/steak house in last 6 months 15,683 79.0% 107 Went to family restaurant/steak house 4+ times/month 5,736 28.9% 110 Spent at family restaurant last 30 days: <$1-30 1,610 8.1% 103 Spent at family restaurant last 30 days: $31-50 1,982 10.0% 108 Spent at family restaurant last 30 days: $51-100 3,398 17.1% 115 Spent at family restaurant last 30 days: $101-200 1,958 9.9% 105 Went to family restaurant last 6 months: for breakfast 2,823 14.2% 110 Went to family restaurant last 6 months: for lunch 4,268 21.5% 116 Went to family restaurant last 6 months: for dinner 10,088 50.8% 112 Went to family restaurant last 6 months: for snack 362 1.8% 93 Went to family restaurant last 6 months: on weekday 6,459 32.5% 109 Went to family restaurant last 6 months: on weekend 9,325 47.0% 117 Went to family restaurant last 6 months: Applebee`s 4,212 21.2% 107 Went to family restaurant last 6 months: Bob Evans 553 2.8% 93 Went to family restaurant last 6 months: Buffalo Wild Wings 2,462 12.4% 129 Went to family restaurant last 6 months: California Pizza Kitchen 510 2.6% 96 Went to family restaurant last 6 months: The Cheesecake Factory 1,575 7.9% 113 Went to family restaurant last 6 months: Chili`s Grill & Bar 2,573 13.0% 123 Went to family restaurant last 6 months: CiCis
    [Show full text]
  • Restaurant Trends App
    RESTAURANT TRENDS APP For any restaurant, Understanding the competitive landscape of your trade are is key when making location-based real estate and marketing decision. eSite has partnered with Restaurant Trends to develop a quick and easy to use tool, that allows restaurants to analyze how other restaurants in a study trade area of performing. The tool provides users with sales data and other performance indicators. The tool uses Restaurant Trends data which is the only continuous store-level research effort, tracking all major QSR (Quick Service) and FSR (Full Service) restaurant chains. Restaurant Trends has intelligence on over 190,000 stores in over 500 brands in every market in the United States. APP SPECIFICS: • Input: Select a point on the map or input an address, define the trade area in minute or miles (cannot exceed 3 miles or 6 minutes), and the restaurant • Output: List of chains within that category and trade area. List includes chain name, address, annual sales, market index, and national index. Additionally, a map is provided which displays the trade area and location of the chains within the category and trade area PRICE: • Option 1 – Transaction: $300/Report • Option 2 – Subscription: $15,000/License per year with unlimited reporting SAMPLE OUTPUT: CATEGORIES & BRANDS AVAILABLE: Asian Flame Broiler Chicken Wing Zone Asian honeygrow Chicken Wings To Go Asian Pei Wei Chicken Wingstop Asian Teriyaki Madness Chicken Zaxby's Asian Waba Grill Donuts/Bakery Dunkin' Donuts Chicken Big Chic Donuts/Bakery Tim Horton's Chicken
    [Show full text]
  • Download a 27-Page PDF of the 2016
    1966 • NRN celebrates 50 years of industry leadership • 2016 WWW.NRN.COM APRIL 4, 2016 CONSUMER PICKS THE DEFINITIVE ANNUAL RANKING OF TOP RESTAURANT BRANDS, PAGE 10 TM ove. It isn’t a word often used in businesses, but it is a word often used about businesses. Whether a customer loves your brand, loves your menu, loves your servers or loves your culture translates into whether your business will thrive. Love is a word businesses should get comfortable with. The annual Consumer Picks special report from Nation’s Restau- rant News and WD Partners is a measure of restaurant brand success from the eyes of their guests. Surveying customers to the tune of 37,339 ratings, Lincluding specific data points on 10 restaurant brand attributes like Cleanliness, Value, Service and Craveability, Consumer Picks ranks 173 chains on whether or not their guests are feeling the love. In this year’s report, starting on page 10, there is valuable analysis on top strat- egies to win over the customer, from the simplicity of cleaning the restaurant to the more complex undertaking of introducing an app to provide guests access to quick mobile payment options. Some winning brands relaunched menus and oth- ers redesigned restaurants. It is very clear through this report’s data and operator insights that to satisfy today’s demanding consumer, a holistic approach to your brand — who you are, what you stand for, the menu items you serve, the style in which you serve it and the atmosphere you provide to your guest — is required. This isn’t anything new.
    [Show full text]
  • Restaurants, Takeaways and Food Delivery Apps
    Restaurants, takeaways and food delivery apps YouGov analysis of British dining habits Contents Introduction 03 Britain’s favourite restaurants (by region) 04 Customer rankings: advocacy, value 06 for money and most improved Profile of takeaway and restaurant 10 regulars The rise of delivery apps 14 Conclusion 16 The tools behind the research 18 +44 (0) 20 7012 6000 ◼ yougov.co.uk ◼ [email protected] 2 Introduction The dining sector is big business in Britain. Nine per cent of the nation eat at a restaurant and order a takeaway at least weekly, with around a quarter of Brits doing both at least once a month. Only 2% of the nation say they never order a takeaway or dine out. Takeaway trends How often do you buy food from a takeaway food outlet, and not eat in the outlet itself? For example, you consume the food at home or elsewhere Takeaway Weekly or Monthly or several Frequency more often times per month Less often Never Weekly or more often 9% 6% 4% 1% Monthly or several times per month 6% 24% 12% 4% Eat out Eat Less often 3% 8% 14% 4% Never 0% 1% 1% 2% (Don’t know = 2%) This paper explores British dining habits: which brands are impressing frequent diners, who’s using food delivery apps, and which restaurants are perceived as offering good quality fare and value for money. +44 (0) 20 7012 6000 ◼ yougov.co.uk ◼ [email protected] 3 02 I Britain’s favourite restaurants (by region) +44 (0) 20 7012 6000 ◼ yougov.co.uk ◼ [email protected] 4 02 I Britain’s favourite restaurants (by region) This map of Britain is based on Ratings data and shows which brands are significantly more popular in certain regions.
    [Show full text]
  • PROXIMITY of FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS to SCHOOLS in Eastern Jackson County (EJC) BACKGROUND
    APRIL 2019 DIVISION OF HEALTH PROMOTION JACKSON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT REPORT PROXIMITY of FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS to SCHOOLS in Eastern Jackson County (EJC) BACKGROUND Obesity by the Numbers JACKSON COUNTY Low Income Children at RESIDENTS WHO Obesity in the United States has be- Higher Risk ARE OBESE come an epidemic. It is a leading Childhood obesity disproportionately factor of chronic disease and health affects children in low income fami- issues and, according to the National lies. While the rate of childhood obe- Center for Health Statistics, the prev- sity increased by 10% from 2003 to alence of adults with obesity in the 2007, it increased somewhere between U.S. is 39.8%.1 Jackson County is not 23-33% for children in low-education, immune to overweight and obesity low-income, and higher-unemploy- rates either. According to the Missouri ment households in that same time County Level Study, 30.58% of Jack- period. A recent study on school dis- son County residents are obese.2 Obe- MISSOURI tricts in Massachusetts found that for sity not only impacts adults; the rate ADOLESCENTS every 1 percent increase in low-income of youth with obesity is 18.5% nation- (10-17 year olds) status, school districts saw a 1.17% in- ally.1 Adolescents in Missouri (10 - 17 WHO ARE OBESE crease in overweight/obesity rates.6 year olds) are obese at a rate of 12.7%. Studies have shown that low-income When considering high school stu- communities often face more barriers dents alone (9th – 12th grade), obe- to improving their overweight/obesity sity rates increase to 16.6%.
    [Show full text]
  • SANTEE BUSINESSES OPEN PROVIDING ESSENTIAL SERVICES These Santee Businesses Were Open As of 4/10/20. Check with Each Outlet To
    SANTEE BUSINESSES OPEN PROVIDING ESSENTIAL SERVICES These Santee businesses were open as of 4/10/20. Check with each outlet to verify if they are continuing services. FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS ▪IHOP – 619-562-4246 (take-out options only) ▪In N Out – 1-800-786-1000 ▪Ahi Poke - 619-328-3028 ▪Jack in the Box (3) - Mast 619-562-4473, ▪Anny’s Fine Burger - 619-258-8288 Mission Gorge 619-448-1245, ▪Baklava King - 619-258-5464 Magnolia 619-258-5492 ▪Baskin Robbins - 619-328-1531 ▪Jamba Juice - 619-448-2746 ▪Bowls N Brews - 619-334-6776 ▪Janet’s Café - 619-749-1786 ▪Buffalo Wild Wings - 619-596-4625 ▪Jersey Mike's Subs - 619-456-9577 ▪Carl's Jr. - 619-562-8715 ▪Junction 52 - 619-499-5399 ▪Cazadores Mexican - 619-449-5347 ▪Kaffee Meister - 619-928-9225 ▪Chai Waii Chinese - 619-596-8898 ▪K F C - 619-448-4890 ▪Chicago Pizza Co. ** - 619-562-8900 ▪Kravings Fruit Bar - 619-749-0116 ▪Chick-fil-A - 619-562-0774 ▪Kung Fu Tea - 619-312-0880 ▪Chili's - 619-258-5811 ▪L&L Hawaiian Barbecue - 619-562-1888 ▪Chipotle Mexican Grill - 619-655-4784 ▪Lakes Market & Deli – 619-562-7415 ▪Coffee Corner (2) - 619-996-9007 ▪The Lean Bean - 619-733-3339 ▪Cold Stone Creamery - 619-258-2510 ▪Leela Thai - 619-334-4019 ▪Cotija’s Mexican - 619-562-0940 ▪Little Caesar's Pizza - 619-562-3500 ▪Cupcake Store** - 619-749-7777 ▪Los Amigos Mexican - 619-562-2037 ▪D’ Wings & Ribs - 619-334-7787 ▪Lucky Chinese - 619-596-2978 ▪Dairy Queen - 619-596-0922 ▪Mary’s Donuts - 619-749-2871 ▪Darya Grill - 619-328-0058 ▪McDonald's** 619-449-9950 ▪Del Taco - 619-562-4462 ▪Natsweets - 619-972-0576 ▪Domino's Pizza **- Drivers – 619-449-5400 ▪Nothing Bundt Cakes - 619-792-1255 ▪Domo Sushi - 619-596-2882 ▪Oaks Tavern & Grill – 619-448-4242 ▪Donutopolis - 619-258-2618 ▪Oggi’s Pizza - 619-449-6441 ▪Eccentric International Chefs - 619-562-0762 ▪Olive Garden – 619-562-1622 ▪Einstein Bros.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Opinion Survey Is Produced Annually by the Committee
    PPuubblliicc OOppiinniioonn SSuurrvveeyy CCoonndduucctteedd BByy:: TThhee CCiittiizzeennss AAddvviissoorryy CCoommmmiitttteeee FFaallll 22001111 The Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), appointed by the City Council, is a group of individuals of various ages and interests bound together by their concern for Visalia. The committee’s mission is to be an advocate and informed voice for the community and an active resource for City Council and staff. The committee prioritizes local issues and concerns and develops recommendations that will affect the future of Visalia. This Public Opinion Survey is produced annually by the committee. The City of Visalia appreciates the Citizens Advisory Committee members, City staff, and other volunteers for their generous help in completing this survey and analyzing the results. CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Chris Gomez, Chairman-Citizens Advisory Committee Matthew Ainley Nyla Hallum Sylvia Baggs Nathan Hernandez Diane Biehle Dirk Holkeboer Luke Feldstein Josh Miller Chris Gomez Betty McNutt Tom Gordon George Shelton Jr Kris Walker PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY SUBCOMMITTEE Nyla Hallum, Chair Sean Mulhair Sylvia Baggs Kris Walker Betty McNutt George Shelton Jr. Laura Florez SURVEY VOLUNTEERS Eric Frost Kris Walker Nathan Hernandez Amy Shuklian David Bruce Laura Florez Sylvia Baggs George Shelton Nora Florez Martha Brooks-Smith Chris Gomez Christy Duheaney Tom Gordon Matt Ainley Mark Nelson Sean Mulhair Luke Feldstein Christina Benavides Nyla Hallum Melody Murch Ana Lopez-Rodriquez Josh Miller Steven Murch Melissa Aragon Martina Aragon Francisco Padilla Anna Moua Diamond Bernard Joseph Avendia CITY OF VISALIA STAFF Eric Frost, Administrative Services Director Amee Sing, Administrative Analyst 2 Table of Contents Introduction Background 4 Summary Highlights 5 Detailed Analysis Quality of Life 6 Safety Rating 7 Public Safety Services Police 8 Fire 9 Quality of Services Most Essential Services besides Police & Fire 10 City Service Rating 11 Questions of Concern Convention Center 16 Traffic Flow 17 District Elections vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Perspectives on Fast-Food History. INSTITUTION American Forum for Global Education, New York, NY
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 442 693 SO 031 552 AUTHOR Smith, Andrew F. TITLE Global Perspectives on Fast-Food History. INSTITUTION American Forum for Global Education, New York, NY. PUB DATE 1999-00-00 NOTE 26p. AVAILABLE FROM The American Forum for Global Education, 120 Wall Street, Suite 2600, New York, NY 10005. For full text: http://www.globaled.org/curriculum/. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Cross Cultural Studies; Current Events; *Economics; Economics Education; Environmental Education; Franchising; *Global Approach; Government (Administrative Body); High Schools; Multicultural Education; Social Studies; United States History; World Geography; World History IDENTIFIERS *Fast Foods ABSTRACT This social studies curriculum unit teaches students in grades ten through twelve about the history and current impact of the fast food industry. The unit uses a topic familiar to students to foster critical thinking about history, geography, government, and economics. Lessons cover the origins of food, highlighting the Colombian Exchange; the growth of the soft drink industry; and the impact of fast food on various areas of one's life, from nutrition to global politics. Detailed student handouts and activity instructions are provided along with an extensive teacher's guide. (Contains 26 references.) (RJC) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. Global Perspectives on Fast-Food History by Andrew Smith The American Forum forGlobal Education 120 Wall Street, Suite 2600 New York, NY 10005 http://www.globaled.org/curriculum/ffood.html 1999 PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE ANG U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS_ Office of Educational Research and Improvement BEEN GRANTED BY EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) ['Thisti document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization A.F.Srri:th originating it.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item 7
    Item Number: AGENDA ITEM 7 TO: CITY COUNCIL Submitted By: Douglas D. Dumhart FROM: CITY MANAGER Community Development Director Meeting Date: Subject: Conceptual Review of a Proposal for the July 19, 2011 Development of a Chase Bank at 5962 La Palma Avenue RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council conceptually approve a proposal for the development of a Chase Bank at 5962 La Palma Avenue and direct staff to draft a Zoning Code Text Amendment and Development Agreement for further consideration. SUMMARY: The City has received a letter from Studley, the real estate brokerage firm representing the property owner at 5962 La Palma Avenue, requesting that the City consider the development of a JP Morgan Chase Bank on their property. The letter is provided as Attachment 1 to this report. The site is located at the southwest corner of Valley View Street and La Palma Avenue and has been vacant for over 10 years. Late last year, the subject parcel was rezoned from Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Planned Neighborhood Development (PND) land use designation, which prohibits financial institutions and banks. The Broker has stated that they have exhausted attempts to find end users for his client’s property that are consistent with the goals of the new PND Zone and that meet the needs of his client. They have a ground lease offer from Chase to develop a free-standing bank. The financial institution use alone does not meet the requirements in the PND Zoning District to develop the commercial corner with retail uses that are lacking in the community.
    [Show full text]
  • SBA Franchise Directory Effective March 31, 2020
    SBA Franchise Directory Effective March 31, 2020 SBA SBA FRANCHISE FRANCHISE IS AN SBA IDENTIFIER IDENTIFIER MEETS FTC ADDENDUM SBA ADDENDUM ‐ NEGOTIATED CODE Start CODE BRAND DEFINITION? NEEDED? Form 2462 ADDENDUM Date NOTES When the real estate where the franchise business is located will secure the SBA‐guaranteed loan, the Collateral Assignment of Lease and Lease S3606 #The Cheat Meal Headquarters by Brothers Bruno Pizza Y Y Y N 10/23/2018 Addendum may not be executed. S2860 (ART) Art Recovery Technologies Y Y Y N 04/04/2018 S0001 1‐800 Dryclean Y Y Y N 10/01/2017 S2022 1‐800 Packouts Y Y Y N 10/01/2017 S0002 1‐800 Water Damage Y Y Y N 10/01/2017 S0003 1‐800‐DRYCARPET Y Y Y N 10/01/2017 S0004 1‐800‐Flowers.com Y Y Y 10/01/2017 S0005 1‐800‐GOT‐JUNK? Y Y Y 10/01/2017 Lender/CDC must ensure they secure the appropriate lien position on all S3493 1‐800‐JUNKPRO Y Y Y N 09/10/2018 collateral in accordance with SOP 50 10. S0006 1‐800‐PACK‐RAT Y Y Y N 10/01/2017 S3651 1‐800‐PLUMBER Y Y Y N 11/06/2018 S0007 1‐800‐Radiator & A/C Y Y Y 10/01/2017 1.800.Vending Purchase Agreement N N 06/11/2019 S0008 10/MINUTE MANICURE/10 MINUTE MANICURE Y Y Y N 10/01/2017 1. When the real estate where the franchise business is located will secure the SBA‐guaranteed loan, the Addendum to Lease may not be executed.
    [Show full text]