DOCSLIB.ORG

& Projectreview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
& Projectreview COMPANY OVERVIEW & PROJECT REVIEW THE TEAM PROJECT TEAM DAVID FLAHERTY MICHAEL COLLINS DERON KINTNER BRANDON BOGAN CARRIE BLASTIC CEO Vice President, General Counsel Vice President, Senior Vice President, Property Management Preconstruction & Design Property Management COMPANY HISTORY FOUNDED IN 1993 510+ EMPLOYEES • Full-Service • Award Winning • Most Active, Mixed-Use Multifamily Developer in the Midwest • Top 45 National Developer 2016 - Present Cosmopolitan on the Canal – Indianapolis, IN • Properties Managed: 72 Cosmopolitan on the Canal – Indianapolis, IN • Units Managed: 11,807 • 7 States • AMO® Designated Company (IREM®) • Properties Types • Market Rate: 8,706 The Depot at Nickel Plate – Fishers, IN • Affordable: 2,229 SINCE 1993, WE HAVE DEVELOPED, CONSTRUCTED AND/OR MANAGED IN THE FOLLOWING STATES: • ALABAMA • GEORGIA • ILLINOIS • INDIANA • IOWA • KENTUCKY • MARYLAND • MICHIGAN • MINNESOTA • MISSISSIPPI • MISSOURI • NEBRASKA • NORTH CAROLINA • OHIO CURRENTURRENTPORTFOLIOPORTFOLIO: : • OKLAHOMA • PENNSYLVANIA 72 PROPERTIES • SOUTH CAROLINA • TENNESSEE 11,807 MULTIFAMILY UNITS • TEXAS 256,229 SQ. FT. RETAIL ACROSS • VIRGINIA • WASHINGTON, D.C. 15 SITES 28th Largest Indianapolis-Area Private Companies 2020 14th Top 30 National Development Firms 2020 6th Midwest RE News Best of the Best Developers 2020 27th Top 100 Affordable Developers 2020 PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS 25 $2.5 Projects Billion ABILITY TO CLOSE 5 $300+ Projects Million SINCE MARCH 2020 CLEVELAND, COLUMBUS, CINCINNATI - OH LAWRENCEBURG, LAPORTE - IN COMPANY HISTORY Community Empowerment Planning Architecture Urban Design Historic Preservation & Reuse Streetscapes & Parks RELEVANT EXPERIENCE APPROACH TO DEVELOPMENT 1. Partnership 2. Collaboration 3. Not “One Size Fits All” 4. Transparency 5. Open Book 6. Delivery of a Transformational & Catalytic Project COMPLETED PROJECTS Name Location Total Development # of Units Retail SF Structured Parking Cost Spaces Cosmopolitan on the Canal Indianapolis, IN $38.5 M 218 19,540 345 The Residence at The COR Ramsey, MN $33.875 M 230 6,489 SF N/A Ninety7Fifty on the Park Orland Park, IL $65 M 295 4,200 SF --- The Boulevard at Oakley Cincinnati, OH $39.2 M 452 N/A N/A Station I & II Axis Indianapolis, IN $74.483 M 336 52,586 SF 482 The Heights Linden Square Gladstone, MO $26.333 M 226 10,269 SF N/A The Depot at Nickel Plate Fishers, IN $40.753 M 242 17,410 SF 430 2700 University St. Paul, MN $55 M 248 2,095 SF 219 The Breakwater New Albany, IN $26.6 M 197 1,644 SF N/A 360 Market Square Indianapolis, IN $121 M 292 42,000 SF 550 Union Berkley Riverfront Kansas City, MO $80 M 410 7,025 SF 400 306 Riverfront District Kokomo, IN $32 M 199 4,800 SF N/A The Arbuckle Brownsburg, IN $37.5 M 208 7,665 SF 400 The Mill at Ironworks Plaza Mishawaka, IN $42 M 232 13,560 SF 398 Stonewater at the Riverwalk Elkhart, IN $28 M 205 6,383 SF 71 RiverHaus Covington, KY $42 M 192 3,127 SF 323 The Yards Kansas City, MO $43 M 229 3,200 SF 225 PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION Structured Project Name Location Total Development # of Units Retail SF Parking Spaces Cost The Residences at St. Washington, DC $102 M 252 N/A N/A Elizabeths East 4th & Race Cincinnati, OH $80 M 264 23,000 SF 700 The Ascent | Top of the Hill Cleveland Heights, OH $84 M 261 11, 414 SF 500 The Banks LaPorte, IN $40 M 194 5,267 SF N/A ONE at The Peninsula Columbus, OH $85 M 330 11,911 Whiskey River Lawrenceburg, IN TBD 154 N/A N/A PROJECTS UNDER DEVELOPMENT Structured Parking Name Location Total Development Cost # of Units Retail SF Spaces The Annex Tulsa, OK $100 M 240 30,200 SF 500 KC River Market Kansas City, MO $80 M 246 5,000 SF 475 Warren Master Development Warren, MI $170 M TBD 50,000 SF TBD Cleveland Heights, OH • 290 luxury apartments • 550 Garage Parking Spaces • 14,000 SF of Retail ONE AT THE PENINSULA Columbus, OH $54M Mixed-Use Project 11-stories | 329 units Retail | Hotel \ Grocery Cincinnati, OH 264 Luxury Apartments 700 Parking Garage Spaces 23,000 SF Retail The Boulevard at Oakley Station Cincinnati, OH 452 Luxury Apartments LEED® Certified RiverHaus Covington, KY 187 Luxury Apartments 3,500 SF Retail 314-Space Parking Garage Indianapolis, IN 292 luxury units 40,000 sq. ft. Whole Foods Market 550-space parking garage RELEVANT EXPERIENCE MERCER COMMONS Cincinnati, OH MERCER COMMONS Cincinnati, OH MERCER COMMONS Cincinnati, OH MERCER COMMONS Cincinnati, OH 121 LARCHMERE Cleveland, OH 121 LARCHMERE Cleveland, OH 121 LARCHMERE Cleveland, OH RECENT INITIATIVES 20 MIXED-USE BUILDINGS 1381 UNITS $199,062,946 IN CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED PROJECT ENGAGEMENT One Development Team: Communicate as a singular team, rich with partnerships Co-Develop Messaging Let’s figure this out together by working with key partners – supporting City of Cleveland Heights throughout the process Communicate Early & Often Share what decisions have been made and when Start Slow to Build Momentum Work with City of Cleveland Heights to develop a strategy that is founded on gaining and building understanding of the initiative Tell A Big Story Frame how this initiative can help support others – city-wide – and how this collective team will deliver Adapt and Create Fun Engagement Capitalize on COVID restrictions – virtual spaces – site walks and tours – partnering with events APPROACH Neighborhood Compatibility: Promote & enhance the Cedar Lee District Site & Streetscape Design Reposition Parking Lot #5 as a New Street that connects Cedar Avenue and Tullamore Road Organize circulation to create intuitive pathways between open spaces, front doors and parking Consider the Cedar-Lee Mini-Park as an interface between new homes and the district Ensure new development has a presence along streets that adds to District’s vitality Greenspace & Placemaking New Meadowbrook Park that provides a place of respite for district residents, visitors and businesses Inner courtyards that offer outdoor spaces that are private and friendly Areas for public art and wayfinding that reflect Cleveland Heights Curated series of “moments” that help people navigate and enjoy the spaces Existing Parking Garage Integration Capitalize on previous City of Cleveland Heights investments Integrate the garage into the overall District and further enhance its form Building Design 4 story buildings that define spaces and streets Dynamic building elevations adding to the animation of Cedar Lee Materials that reflect history while bringing an updated aesthetic SITE PLAN SITE PLAN TYPICAL FEATURES & AMENITIES • 9’ CEILINGS • 42” KITCHEN CABINETS • FITNESS CLUB • GRANITE COUNTERTOPS • OUTDOOR COURTYARD • PENDANT LIGHTING • RESORT-STYLE AMENITIES • GRILLING STATION • ROMAN SOAKING TUBS W/ TILE • POOL W/ WET DECK • FIRE PIT(S) SURROUNDS • BIKE SHOP / REPAIR TOOLS • SECURED PARKING • BRUSHED CHROME HARDWARE • PET SPA / BARK PARK • SECURED RESIDENTIAL LOBBY • FRONT LOAD WASHER / DRYER • CO-WORKING SPACE • DEMONSTRATION KITCHEN & DINING AREA • STAINLESS STEEL APPLIANCES • MEDIA LOUNGE • CLUB ROOM • BALCONIES • BILLIARDS • LEASING OFFICE • 2” WINDOW BLINDS TYPICAL DEMOGRAPHICS • 70% Millennials, 25% Empty Nesters, • 5% Other • 2/3 New Residents to Each City • 1.5x # of Residential Units • Active & Social Lifestyle WHY CHOOSE US? • Local Expertise & National Experience • Familiarity • Certainty of Execution • Financial Strength • Public / Private Partnership Experience • Long Term Holders / Partners .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cleveland/Detroit Study Team Final Report
    Federal Aviation Administration Cleveland/Detroit Metroplex Optimization of Airspace and Procedures Study Team Final Report May 2014 By Cleveland/Detroit Metroplex Study Team Table of Contents 1 Background 1 2 Purpose of the Metroplex Study Team 2 3 Cleveland/Detroit Metroplex Study Team Analysis Process 3 3.1 Five Step Process 3 3.2 Cleveland/Detroit Study Area Scope 5 3.3 Assumptions and Constraints 6 3.4 Assessment Methodology 6 3.4.1 Track Data Selected for Analyses 7 3.4.2 Analysis and Design Tools 9 3.4.3 Determining the Number of Operations and Modeled Fleet Mix 10 3.4.4 Determining Percent of RNAV Capable Operations by Airport 12 3.4.5 Profile Analyses 13 3.4.6 Cost to Carry (CTC) 13 3.4.7 Benefits Metrics 13 3.5 Key Considerations for Evaluation of Impacts and Risks 15 4 Identified Issues and Proposed Solutions 16 4.1 Design Concepts 16 4.2 CLE Procedures 19 4.2.1 CLE Arrivals 20 4.2.2 CLE Departures 34 4.2.3 CLE SAT Departures Issues 43 4.2.4 Summary of Potential Benefits for CLE 44 4.3 DTW Procedures 45 4.3.1 DTW Arrivals 45 4.3.2 DTW Departures 72 4.3.3 Summary of Potential Benefits for DTW 85 4.4 D21 Airspace Issues 86 4.5 T-Route Notional Designs 87 4.6 Military Issues 88 4.6.1 180th FW Issues 88 4.6.2 KMTC Issues 89 4.7 Industry Issues 90 4.8 Out of Scope Issues 90 4.9 Additional D&I Considerations 91 5 Summary of Benefits 92 5.1 Qualitative Benefits 92 5.1.1 Near-Term Impacts 92 i 5.1.2 Long-Term Impacts to Industry 93 5.2 Quantitative Benefits 93 Appendix A Acronyms 95 Appendix B PBN Toolbox 99 ii List of Figures Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago-South Bend-Toledo-Cleveland-Erie-Buffalo-Albany-New York Frequency Expansion Report – Discussion Draft 2 1
    Chicago-South Bend-Toledo-Cleveland-Erie-Buffalo- Albany-New York Frequency Expansion Report DISCUSSION DRAFT (Quantified Model Data Subject to Refinement) Table of Contents 1. Project Background: ................................................................................................................................ 3 2. Early Study Efforts and Initial Findings: ................................................................................................ 5 3. Background Data Collection Interviews: ................................................................................................ 6 4. Fixed-Facility Capital Cost Estimate Range Based on Existing Studies: ............................................... 7 5. Selection of Single Route for Refined Analysis and Potential “Proxy” for Other Routes: ................ 9 6. Legal Opinion on Relevant Amtrak Enabling Legislation: ................................................................... 10 7. Sample “Timetable-Format” Schedules of Four Frequency New York-Chicago Service: .............. 12 8. Order-of-Magnitude Capital Cost Estimates for Platform-Related Improvements: ............................ 14 9. Ballpark Station-by-Station Ridership Estimates: ................................................................................... 16 10. Scoping-Level Four Frequency Operating Cost and Revenue Model: .................................................. 18 11. Study Findings and Conclusions: .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trauma Centers
    Updated: 5/5/2021 TRAUMA CENTERS Location Level EMS Adult Pediatric HOSPITAL CITY COUNTY Status Expires Visit Date Region Level Level Akron Children's Hospital Akron Summit 5 ACS 9/10/2022 2 Atrium Medical Center Franklin Butler 6 ACS 11/6/2022 3 Aultman Hospital Canton Stark 5 ACS 10/24/2021 6/4/2021 V 2 Bethesda North Cincinnati Hamilton 6 ACS 6/9/2022 3 Blanchard Valley Hospital Findlay Hancock 1 ACS 1/15/2024 3 Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati Hamilton 6 ACS 1/23/2022 1 Cleveland Clinic Akron General Akron Summit 5 ACS 4/17/2022 1 Cleveland Clinic Fairview Hospital Cleveland Cuyahoga 2 ACS 3/9/2022 2 Cleveland Clinic Hillcrest Hospital Mayfield Heights Cuyahoga 2 ACS 12/9/2021 2 Dayton Children's Hospital Dayton Montgomery 3 ACS 2/12/2024 1 Firelands Regional Medical Center Sandusky Erie 1 ACS 2/23/2023 3 Fisher-Titus Medical Center Norwalk Huron 1 ACS 11/23/2022 3 Genesis HealthCare System Zanesville Muskingum 8 ACS 10/6/2024 3 Grandview Medical Center Dayton Montgomery 3 ACS 10/26/2022 3 Kettering Health Network Fort Hamilton Hospital Hamilton Butler 6 Ohio-18 8/24/2022 *3* Kettering Health Network Soin Medical Center Beavercreek Greene 3 ACS 11/13/2023 3 Kettering Medical Center Kettering Montgomery 3 ACS 1/11/2023 2 Lima Memorial Hospital Lima Allen 1 ACS 5/13/2021 5/4-5/2021 V 2 Marietta Memorial Hospital Marietta Washington 8 ACS 11/20/2022 3 Mercy Health St. Charles Hospital Toledo Lucas 1 ACS 12/8/2022 3 Mercy Health St.
    [Show full text]
  • The City of Milwaukee's Uncommon Revenue Structure and How It Compares to Peer Cities
    About the Public Policy Forum The Milwaukee-based Public Policy Forum, established in 1913 as a local government watchdog, is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to enhancing the effectiveness of government and the development of Southeastern Wisconsin through objective research of regional public policy issues. Preface and Acknowledgments This report was undertaken to provide citizens and policymakers in the Milwaukee region and across the state with insights into the City of Milwaukee's revenue structure and how Milwaukee's framework for financing its city government compares with other similarly-sized cities across the United States. We hope that policymakers and community leaders will use the report’s findings to inform discussions during upcoming policy debates and budget deliberations at both the City and State level. Report authors would like to thank Milwaukee fiscal officials and staff, as well as budget officials from Pittsburgh, Minneapolis, Cleveland, and Kansas City, for their assistance in providing financial information and for patiently answering our questions. We also would like to thank the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy and its staff for the use of their database and for similarly answering our questions. In addition, we wish to acknowledge and thank the Greater Milwaukee Committee, which commissioned and helped fund this research as part of its MKE United initiative. We also thank the Northwestern Mutual Foundation and the Rockwell Automation Charitable Corporation for their long- standing support of our local government finance research. On the Money? T he City of Milwaukee's U n c o m m o n Revenue Structure and How it Compares to Peer Cities July 2017 Report Authors: Rob Henken, President Douglass Day, Researcher Susan Moeser, Researcher Ben Juarez, Researcher introduction In September 2016, the Public Policy Forum released Making Ends Meet,1 a comprehensive analysis of the City of Milwaukee's fiscal condition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cleveland Columbus & Cincinnati Railroad (1851)
    Roots of the New York Central Railroad in Columbus, Ohio By Rowlee Steiner* 1952 THE CLEVELAND COLUMBUS & CINCINNATI RAILROAD (1851) Among the charters re-activated by the state in the late 1840's was the one which had been granted in 1836 to the Cleveland Columbus & Cincinnati Railroad. This company then started construction of a railroad from Cleveland thru Galion and Delaware to Columbus. The road entered Columbus from the north, running east of and parallel to Fourth Street, then swinging southwestward to enter the passenger depot of the road from Xenia. Regular traffic over this second road to enter Columbus was opened in April, 1851, more than a year after the Xenia road operated its first train. However, a grand excursion train passed over the road from Columbus to Cleveland on February 21, 1851, carrying members of the state legislature, city authorities of Columbus, and many other citizens, returning them to Columbus after a day’s visit in Cleveland. Although Cincinnati was included in the company name, the road was built originally between Cleveland and Columbus. The first actual move toward Cincinnati came in 1862. The Springfield Mt. Vernon & Pittsburgh Railroad had been nearly completed from Springfield thru Marysville to Delaware when the compony became insolvent, and in the litigation which followed, the property was conveyed to the Cleveland Columbus & Cincinnati Railroad. In 1868, the Cleveland Columbus & Cincinnati Railroad consolidated with the Bellefontaine Railroad and the name of the consolidated properties became the Cleveland Columbus Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railroad. The consolidation gave the company a railroad consisting of lines between Cleveland and Columbus, Galion and Indianapolis, and Delaware and Springfield.
    [Show full text]
  • Detroit–Shoreway Neighborhood Plan Summary
    DETROIT-SHOREWAY NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN SUMMARY Description. Development began in the neighborhood in the 1850s along Detroit Street (Avenue), a major route connecting Cleveland with regions to the west and serving as the neighborhood’s main commercial district. Beginning in the late 1890s, industries began locating along the rail lines on the bluffs overlooking Lake Erie and then began to develop further to the south, along the rail lines running through the Walworth Run Valley. Detroit-Shoreway was built as a middle-income neighborhood, with a mix of single- and two-family homes and small multi-family structures, with more architecturally distinguished homes constructed along Franklin Avenue. There is still a strong presence of Italian and Romanian-American ethnic communities. In recent years, new waves of immigration have brought growing numbers of Hispanic and Asian residents. Assets. Among the neighborhood’s most significant assets are: • its proximity to Lake Erie and Edgewater Park • the West 65 th /Detroit retail district anchored by the Gordon Square Arcade and a growing cultural, performing arts and entertainment environment • a regionally renowned antiques and collectibles district on Lorain Avenue between West 45 th Street and Clark Avenue • the Eco-Village, an environmentally sensitive new housing development built in conjunction with adjacent rapid transit and recreational amenities at West 65 th and Lorain • new housing projects such as Ashbury Tower and Battery Park on former industrial sites Challenges. Among the challenges faced by the Detroit-Shoreway neighborhood today are: • creating stronger connections to the Lake Erie shoreline • the cost to clean-up contaminated industrial sites for reuse • attracting more retail uses to serve the shopping needs of residents • improving the appearance along the main commercial corridors of Detroit and Lorain • poor housing conditions in the neighborhood south of Lorain Avenue Vision.
    [Show full text]
  • ANSWER ______Defendant ______Address JURY TRIAL DEMAND Yes ______City, State, Zip Code
    COURT OF COMMON PLEAS GENERAL DIVISION CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ___________________________ CASE NO._________________________ Plaintiff JUDGE____________________________ vs. ANSWER ___________________________ Defendant ___________________________ Address JURY TRIAL DEMAND Yes ___________________________ City, State, Zip Code Defendant(s) ________________________________hereby answers Plaintiff's [Defendant's name] Complaint as follows: __. _____________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ __. ____________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ __. ____________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ __. ____________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Why a University for Chicago and Not Cleveland? Religion and John D
    Why a University For Chicago And Not Cleveland? Religion And John D. Rockefeller’s Early Philanthropy, 1855-1900 Kenneth W. Rose Assistant to the Director Rockefeller Archive Center ____________________ © 1995. This essay is a revised version of a paper prepared for the Western Reserve Studies Symposium in Cleveland, Ohio, October 6-7, 1995, and included in From All Sides: Philanthropy in the Western Reserve. Papers, Abstracts, and Program of the Tenth Annual Western Reserve Studies Symposium, sponsored by the Case Western Reserve University American Studies Program. (Cleveland: Case Western Reserve University, 1995), pp. 30-41. The author welcomes the scholarly use of the ideas and information in this essay, provided that the users properly acknowledge the source and notify the author of such citation at [email protected]. ____________________ Clevelanders sometimes seem to have a “What have you done for me lately?” attitude with regard to John D. Rockefeller. As if the creation on the Cuyahoga’s shores of one of the country’s most powerful and influential corporations is not enough, some Clevelanders look to Rockefeller’s enormous charitable giving and wonder why he built no major institution in Cleveland to provide jobs and world renown under the Rockefeller banner. Most people who express such opinions often point, with a hint of jealousy, to the University of Chicago as an example of Cleveland’s missing Rockefeller landmark. To believe that a Rockefeller-endowed University of Cleveland would today have the same academic and intellectual reputation as the present-day University of Chicago, one must assume that the same personalities and forces that shaped the University of Chicago would have been present in Cleveland, and that they would have behaved and acted exactly the same way in this different environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Decks and Sample Drawings (PDF)
    CLEVELAND HEIGHTS BUILDING DEPARTMENT 40 SEVERANCE CIRCLE CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, OHIO 44118 216-291-4900/216-291-4421 (FAX) Policy Bulletin No. 89-02 DECKS RE: DECK DESIGN REVIEW PROCEDURES AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS 1. Building permits are required for construction of all decks. 2. Plans for multi-level, mixed-material, roofed, arbored or trellised decks, as well as for front yard decks, must be submitted to the Architectural Board of Review (ABR). ABR applications may be obtained from the Building Department. 3. All decks must meet standard construction requirements, e.g., proper joist spans, as well as the specifications listed here. 4. All post footers and step foundations must be 36 inches below grade. 5. Decks which are 30 inches or more above grade must have a railing of approved design. Railings must be 36 inches above the deck floor with spacing of less than four inches between spindles or other structural members. Step railing shall match deck railing in design. 6. Perimeter benches on decks requiring railings shall have back-rests. 7. Decking (floor) boards shall be spaced approximately 1/16th inch apart, and per Manufactuerer’s specifications. 8. Ground beneath deck must be covered with three inches of gravel on top of a weed barrier. The space below the deck floor may be left open. Lattice, if used, must be framed. 9. Grade-level decks shall be designed to provide for adequate water runoff by means of drains, sloping or other approved drainage, as approved by a building inspector. 10. Electrical service conductors must maintain a minimum of 10’ (ten feet) clearance to deck surface.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greater Cleveland Partnership
    ____________________________________________________________________________________ FINDING A NEW VOICE FOR CORPORATE LEADERS IN A CHANGED URBAN WORLD: THE GREATER CLEVELAND PARTNERSHIP Royce Hanson Hal Wolman David Connolly The George Washington Institute of Public Policy A Case Study Prepared for the The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program September 2006 ______________________________________________________________________________ THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION METROPOLITAN POLICY PROGRAM SUMMARY OF PUBLICATIONS 2006* DISCUSSION PAPERS/RESEARCH BRIEFS Tools to Avoid Disclosing Information About Individuals in Public Use Microdata Files Fulfilling the Promise: Seven Steps to Successful Community-Based Information Strategies From Poverty, Opportunity: Putting the Market to Work for Lower Income Families Making Sense of Clusters: Regional Competitiveness and Economic Development The Earned Income Tax Credit at Age 30: What We Know Financial Access for Immigrants: Lessons from Diverse Perspectives The Shape of Metropolitan Growth: How Policy Tools Affect Growth Patterns in Seattle and Orlando Homes for an Inclusive City: A Comprehensive Housing Strategy for Washington, D. C. TREND SURVEYS Federal Allocations in Response to Katrina, Rita, and Wilma: An Update New Goals and Outcomes for Temporary Assistance: State Choices in the Decade after Enactment Kids in the City: Indicators of Child Well-Being in Large Cities from the 2004 American Community Survey From Traditional to Reformed: A Review of the Land Use Regulations in the Nation's
    [Show full text]
  • The Next Economy and Ohio About the Global Cities Initiative
    OHIO GLOBAL CITIES INITIATIVE REGIONAL PROFILE About the Global Cities Initiative The Global Cities Initiative, a joint project of Brookings and JPMorgan Chase, aims to equip U.S. metropoli- tan leaders with the information, policy ideas, and partners necessary to bolster their position within the global economy. Brookings' commitment to fact-based independent research, analysis, and policy prescrip- tions will complement JPMorgan Chase's business expertise to help America's metropolitan leaders flour- ish in the changing economic and political landscape. We will convene public and private sector leaders from a range of metropolitan areas for a series of forums each year that will discern best practices and CLEVELAND, OH strategies for economic growth and put these practices into action. GMP: $105.6 b The Next Economy and Ohio The Great Recession's toll on America has motivated a growing chorus of business leaders and economists to call for a rebalancing of the American economy, towards one driven by exports, powered by low carbon, DAYTON, OH fueled by innovation, and rich with opportunity. An economy with these characteristics will be largely GMP: 33.4 b metropolitan in form and function. The Brookings Metropolitan Policy Program has studied the position of the nation's 100 largest metropoli- COLUMBUS, OH tan areas on each of the pillars of the Next Economy, including international exports, employment in the GMP: $93.4 b clean economy and high-technology sectors, and workforce skills and wages. This overview profiles the distinct Next Economy assets and starting points of a region of focus for the Global Cities Initiative: the Ohio metropolitan areas of Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, and Dayton, which CINCINNATI, OH together house 55 percent of the state’s population and generate 63 percent of its GDP.
    [Show full text]
  • Restaurant Guide Was Compiled for Your Convenience by the City of Cleveland Heights
    Heights Cleveland R estaurantGuide Where&more! to go for...bread or burgers, cocktails or coffee, international or vegetarian cuisine, jazz or alternative rock, martinis or movies, pancakes or pizza, subs or sushi... the list goes on ! Whether you want to stop for a quick bite, linger over breakfast with a steaming cup of coffee, share a pizza, dine alfresco, or join friends for a night out, you’ll find just the spot in Cleveland Heights. Be sure to call ahead to check for times – and have fun! CLEVELAND HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL Jason S. Stein, Mayor Kahlil Seren, Vice Mayor Craig Cobb Mary Dunbar Melody Joy Hart Davida Russell Michael N. Ungar Susanna Niermann O’Neil, City Manager www.clevelandheights.com This Restaurant Guide was compiled for your convenience by the City of Cleveland Heights. Please call ahead to find out restaurants’ and venues’ hours of operation, credit card policies, accessibility, etc. Updated July 2021 Brueggers Bagel Bakery The Boujie Bakery 12443 Cedar Road • 216-321-8933Bakeries1774 Lee Road • 216-400-7277 Hot bagels, soup and sandwiches Cupcakes, cookies, cakes, beverages & treats http://www.brueggers.com www.theboujiebakry.com Happy Bees The Stone Oven Bakery/Cafe 1783 Coventry Road 2267 Lee Road • 216-932-3003 Ice cream, yogurt & alcohol-infused treats Rustic crusty breads, pastries, soup, sandwiches http://www.scoopsofhappy.com www.stone-oven.com Luna Bakery & Café The Sweet Fix Bakery 2482 Fairmount Blvd • 216-231-8585 2307 Lee Road • 216-371-9866 A 45-seat café serving paninis, crepes, sweets Gluten-free
    [Show full text]