Visa Member Agent List (Europe Region)
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
February 2019
The definitive source of news and analysis of the global fintech sector | February 2019 www.bankingtech.com SUPERSTRUCTURES Fintech reaches new heights CASE STUDY: CITIZENS BANK US heavyweight pivots for digital era FOOD FOR THOUGHT: CAREER CHOICES The Venn diagram of doom FINTECH FUTURES IN THIS ISSUE THEM US Contents NEWS 04 The latest fintech news from around the globe: the good, the bad and the ugly. 18 Banking Technology Awards The glamour, the winners and the celebrations. 23 Focus: intraday liquidity Are banks ready to meet the ECB’s latest expectations? 24 Interview: Pavel Novak, Zonky P2P lender on a “mission possible”. 26 Focus: data How DNB uses data to reconnect with customers. 30 Analysis: openfunds Admirable data standardisation efforts for the funds industry. 32 Case study: Citizens Bank US’s 13th largest bank embraces digital era. 38 Food for thought Making career choices and the Venn diagram of doom. They struggle with Fintech complexity. We see straight to your goal. We leverage proprietary knowledge and technology to solve complex regulatory challenges, create new products 40 Comment What would a recession mean for fintech? and build businesses. Our unique “one fi rm” approach brings to bear best-in-class talent from our 32 offi ces worldwide—creating teams that blend global reach and local knowledge. Looking for a fi rm that can help keep 42 Interview: Javier Santamaría, EPC your business moving in the right direction? Visit BCLPlaw.com to learn more. Happy one year anniversary, SEPA Instant Credit Transfer! REGULARS 44 -
VISA Europe AIS Certified Service Providers
Visa Europe Account Information Security (AIS) List of PCI DSS validated service providers Effective 08 September 2010 __________________________________________________ The companies listed below successfully completed an assessment based on the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS). 1 The validation date is when the service provider was last validated. PCI DSS assessments are valid for one year, with the next annual report due one year from the validation date. Reports that are 1 to 60 days late are noted in orange, and reports that are 61 to 90 days late are noted in red. Entities with reports over 90 days past due are removed from the list. It is the member’s responsibility to use compliant service providers and to follow up with service providers if there are any questions about their validation status. 2 Service provider Services covered by Validation date Assessor Website review 1&1 Internet AG Internet payment 31 May 2010 SRC Security www.ipayment.de processing Research & Consulting Payment gateway GmbH Payment processing a1m GmbH Payment gateway 31 October 2009 USD.de AG www.a1m.biz Internet payment processing Payment processing A6IT Limited Payment gateway 30 April 2010 Kyte Consultants Ltd www.A6IT.com Abtran Payment processing 31 July 2010 Rits Information www.abtran.com Security Accelya UK Clearing and Settlement 31 December 2009 Trustwave www.accelya.com ADB-UTVECKLING AB Payment gateway 30 November 2009 Europoint Networking WWW.ADBUTVECKLING.SE AB Adeptra Fraud Prevention 30 November 2009 Protiviti Inc. www.adeptra.com Debt Collection Card Activation Adflex Payment Processing 31 March 2010 Evolution LTD www.adflex.co.uk Payment Gateway/Switch Clearing & settlement 1 A PCI DSS assessment only represents a ‘snapshot’ of the security in place at the time of the review, and does not guarantee that those security controls remain in place after the review is complete. -
List of Merchants 4
Merchant Name Date Registered Merchant Name Date Registered Merchant Name Date Registered 9001575*ARUBA SPA 05/02/2018 9013807*HBC SRL 05/02/2018 9017439*FRATELLI CARLI SO 05/02/2018 9001605*AGENZIA LAMPO SRL 05/02/2018 9013943*CASA EDITRICE LIB 05/02/2018 9017440*FRATELLI CARLI SO 05/02/2018 9003338*ARUBA SPA 05/02/2018 9014076*MAILUP SPA 05/02/2018 9017441*FRATELLI CARLI SO 05/02/2018 9003369*ARUBA SPA 05/02/2018 9014276*CCS ITALIA ONLUS 05/02/2018 9017442*FRATELLI CARLI SO 05/02/2018 9003946*GIUNTI EDITORE SP 05/02/2018 9014368*EDITORIALE IL FAT 05/02/2018 9017574*PULCRANET SRL 05/02/2018 9004061*FREDDY SPA 05/02/2018 9014569*SAVE THE CHILDREN 05/02/2018 9017575*PULCRANET SRL 05/02/2018 9004904*ARUBA SPA 05/02/2018 9014616*OXFAM ITALIA 05/02/2018 9017576*PULCRANET SRL 05/02/2018 9004949*ELEMEDIA SPA 05/02/2018 9014762*AMNESTY INTERNATI 05/02/2018 9017577*PULCRANET SRL 05/02/2018 9004972*ARUBA SPA 05/02/2018 9014949*LIS FINANZIARIA S 05/02/2018 9017578*PULCRANET SRL 05/02/2018 9005242*INTERSOS ASSOCIAZ 05/02/2018 9015096*FRATELLI CARLI SO 05/02/2018 9017676*PIERONI ROBERTO 05/02/2018 9005281*MESSAGENET SPA 05/02/2018 9015228*MEDIA SHOPPING SP 05/02/2018 9017907*ESITE SOCIETA A R 05/02/2018 9005607*EASY NOLO SPA 05/02/2018 9015229*SILVIO BARELLO 05/02/2018 9017955*LAV LEGA ANTIVIVI 05/02/2018 9006680*PERIODICI SAN PAO 05/02/2018 9015245*ASSURANT SERVICES 05/02/2018 9018029*MEDIA ON SRL 05/02/2018 9007043*INTERNET BOOKSHOP 05/02/2018 9015286*S.O.F.I.A. -
MOBILE Payments Market Guide 2013
MOBILE PAYMENTS MARKET GUIDE 2013 INSIGHTS IN THE WORLDWIDE MOBILE TRANSACTION SERVICES ECOSYSTEM OVER 350 COMPANIES WORLDWIDE INSIDE Extensive global distribution via worldwide industry events As the mobile payments ecosystem is becoming increasingly more crowded and competitive, the roles of established and new players in the mobile market is shifting, with new opportunities and challenges facing each category of service providers. Efma, the global organization that brings together more than 3,300 retail financial services companies from over 130 countries, welcomes the publication of the Mobile Payments Market Guide 2013 by The Paypers as a valuable source of information and guidance for all actors in the mobile transaction services space. Patrick Desmarès - CEO, Efma MOBILE PAYMENTS MARKET GUIDE 2013 INSIGHTS IN THE WORLDWIDE MOBILE TRANSACTION SERVICES ECOSYSTEM Authors Ionela Barbuta Sabina Dobrean Monica Gaza Mihaela Mihaila Adriana Screpnic RELEASE | VERSION 1.0 | APRIL 2013 | COPYRIGHT © THE Paypers BV | ALL RIGHTS reserved 2 MOBILE PAYMENTS MARKET GUIDE 2013 INTRODUCTION Introduction You are reading the Mobile Payments Market Guide 2013, a state- se and the way commerce is done. From a quick and accessible of-the-art overview of the global mobile transaction services channel for banking on the move to a sophisticated tool for shop- ecosystem and the most complete and up-to-date reference ping, price comparison and buying, the saga of the mobile device source for mobile payments, mobile commerce and mobile is an on-going story that unfolds in leaps and bounds within a banking-related information at global level. This guide is published progressively crowded (and potentially fragmented) ecosystem. -
Service Provider Name Region AOC Date Assessor DESV
A company’s name appears on this Compliant Service Provider List if (i) Mastercard has received a copy of an Attestation of Compliance (AOC) by a Qualified Security Assessor (QSA) reflecting validation of the company being PCI DSS compliant and (ii) Mastercard records reflect the company is registered as a Service Provider by one or more Mastercard Customers. The date of the AOC and the name of the QSA are also provided. Each AOC is valid for one year. Mastercard receives copies of AOCs from various sources. This Compliant Service Provider List is provided solely for the convenience of Mastercard Customers and any Customer that relies upon or otherwise uses this Compliant Service Provider list does so at the Customer’s sole risk. While Mastercard endeavors to keep the list current as of the date set forth in the footer, Mastercard disclaims any and all warranties of any kind, including any warranty of accuracy or completeness or fitness for any particular purpose. Mastercard disclaims any and all liability of any nature relating to or arising in connection with the use of or reliance on the Compliant Service Provider List or any part thereof. Each Mastercard Customer is obligated to comply with Mastercard Rules and other Standards pertaining to use of a Service Provider. As a reminder, an AOC by a QSA provides a “snapshot” of security controls in place at a point in time. Compliant Service Provider 1-60 Days Past AOC Due Date 61-90 Days Past AOC Due Date Service Provider Name Region AOC Date Assessor DESV “BPC Processing”, LLC Europe 03/31/2017 Informzaschita 1&1 Internet SE (1&1, 1&1 ipayment, Europe 05/08/2017 Security Research & Consulting GmbH ipayment.de) 1Shoppingcart.com (Web.com Group, lnc.) US 04/29/2017 SecurityMetrics 2138617 Ontario Inc. -
Privilege Agreement
MERCHANT AGREEMENT THIS MERCHANT AGREEMENT is executed at Mumbai on the Effective Date as mentioned herein TABLE 1: Sr. Particulars Details No. 1. Agreement Execution and Effective date 2. Merchant Name 3. Merchant Address 4. Merchant Business filing Status 5. Merchant Site (URL) & Product/ Service Description 6. Product / Service 7. PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS: The Merchant hereby instructs the Service Provider to make payment of Customer Charge in respect of a Customer Order in the bank account details mentioned in the Cheque/ Bank Statement provided by the Merchant. The Merchant agrees to pay the TDR and other charges as per the selected Pricing Scheme, the details of the TDR are mentioned in Annexure A hereto. Payment Schedule: The Merchant will receive the Customer Charges on a Td + 1 business day/Weekly basis. The TDR and the payment schedule may be revised by the Service Provider in accordance with the regulatory policies or as agreed between the Service Provider and Merchant from time to time. Any change in TDR and payment schedule due to mandates of Reserve Bank of India or Facility providers or Service Provider’s business promotion schemes shall be informed by the Service Provider to the Merchant and such change shall deemed to be accepted by the Merchant, if no written communication of non-acceptance of change is received from Merchant within 7 days of such intimation of change. By Signing this Agreement I/we/ the Merchant state that: I/ We have read and understood the Terms and Conditions as mentioned in the following Agreement. We agree that the payment gateway services of Infibeam Avenues Limited shall be govern by this Agreement and the same shall be legally binding on Merchant. -
Retrieval & Chargeback Best Practices Visa Mastercard Discover
Retrieval & Chargeback Best Practices A Merchant User Guide to Help Manage Disputes Visa MasterCard Discover American Express October 2015 www.FirstData.com Dispute Management Guide This guide is provided as a courtesy and is to be used for general information purposes only. First Data shall not be responsible for any inaccurate or incomplete information. The matters contained herein are subject to change. Individual circumstances may vary and procedures may be amended or supplemented as appropriate. This is not intended to be a complete listing of all applicable guidelines and/or procedures. No information contained herein alters any existing contractual obligations between First Data and its clients. The purpose of this guide is to provide merchants and their back office staff with additional educational guidance as it relates to Visa and MasterCard dispute processing. This manual contains information that relates to specific industry processing environments and includes best practices for doing business and avoiding loss as it relates to fraud and/or chargebacks. This guide does not take away from the terms or conditions outlined in your merchant processing agreement or replace current operation regulations. All chargeback’s should be reviewed and presented as individual cases. Although the reason codes may be the same, supporting documentation required to remedy individual chargeback scenarios may vary. © 2015 First Data Corporation. All Rights Reserved. All trademarks, service marks and trade names referenced in this material are the property of their respective owners. This document contains confidential and proprietary information of First Data Corporation. Review or distribution by individuals other than the intended recipients is strictly prohibited. -
Chargeback Procedures and Fraud Prevention - Secure Credit Card Processing | E-Onlinedata
Chargeback Procedures and Fraud Prevention - Secure Credit Card Processing | e-onlinedata 0 Home Merchant Services Reseller Programs Current Resellers Customer Service Our Company Home > Customer Service > Chargeback and Fraud Prevention Customer Service FAQs Chargeback Procedures & Fraud Prevention PCI Data Security Our Commitment to Secure Credit Card Processing PCI Frequently Asked Questions Criminals and hackers are all too aware of the latest security measures that Visa and MasterCard are creating to control fraud and identity theft. Merchants must Chargeback and Fraud Prevention be alert and take extra precautions wherever possible, because they are financially responsible for fraudulent transactions, including those approved by Best Practices the cardholder’s issuing bank. e-onlinedata is committed to helping merchants Glossary of Terms control and prevent credit card fraud. Support Request Forms Page index: General Inquiry Chargeback Process Merchant Inquiry Preventing Chargebacks 12 potential signs of Card Not Present Fraud Privacy Policy Visa-MasterCard Card Not Present Fraud Prevention Tools Visa and MasterCard will allow any cardholder to chargeback a purchase if the customer can demonstrate to ANY degree that they have not received the products or services promised by your company in the quantity, quality and time frame promised. In other words, if your company promises product or services delivery on Tuesday, but the product or service is not delivered until Wednesday (a day late), that cardholder can probably charge that sale back with little you can do about it. Likewise, if the quantity or quality of products or services delivered are not exactly as described on your site or in other marketing materials, the cardholder will be allowed to chargeback the purchase. -
List of Notifications of Payment Institutions
LIST OF NOTIFICATIONS OF PAYMENT INSTITUTIONS 19 September 2019 Page 2 of 28 List of notifications of payment institutions Payment institution Competent national Method of Payment services1 Date of receipt of authority providing payment the notification services in Slovenia MoneyGram Financial Services via agents: 6. 27/10/2009 International Ltd2 Authority (GBR) Gorenjska banka d.d., Kranj3 Abanka Vipa d. d.4 Envoy Services Ltd Financial Services direct provision of 1., 3., 4., 5., 6. 29/10/2009 Authority (GBR) payment services Chase Paymentech Central Bank of Ireland direct provision of 3., 5., 7. 30/10/2009 Europe Ltd (IRL) payment services WorldPay Ltd5 Financial Services direct provision of 3., 5., 6. 02/11/2009 Authority (GBR) payment services Caxton FX Ltd Financial Services direct provision of 6. 05/11/2009 Authority (GBR) payment services PXP Financial6 Financial Services direct provision of 1., 2., 3., 4., 5. 05/11/2009 Authority (GBR) payment services KBR Foreign Financial Services direct provision of 6. 05/11/2009 Exchange PLC Authority (GBR) payment services World First UK Ltd7 Financial Services direct provision of 4., 6. 05/11/2009 Authority (GBR) payment services CambioReal Ltd Financial Services direct provision of 6. 05/11/2009 Authority (GBR) payment services Currencies Direct Ltd Financial Services direct provision of 6. 05/11/20098 Authority (GBR) payment services Currency UK Ltd Financial Services direct provision of 6. 05/11/2009 Authority (GBR) payment services 1 Payment services as cited by number of payment service in first paragraph of Article 5 of ZPlaSS which implements the Directive 2007/64/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on payment services in the internal market amending Directives 97/7/EC, 2002/65/EC, 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 97/5/EC. -
Financial Technology Sector Overview of Market Activity in the Financial Technology Sector William Blair & Company
Quarterly Update Q1 2015 Financial Technology Sector Overview of Market Activity in the Financial Technology Sector William Blair & Company Financial Technology Sector – First Quarter 2015 Update M&A and capital markets activity remained strong during the first quarter of 2015, particularly in the United States. In fact, U.S. stock indices marked all-time highs during the quarter and deal-making activity continued its upward trajectory, propelled by improving confidence among consumers and corporate executives, low-cost credit, and record levels of cash. While market participants largely ignored the prospect of rising interest rates, a collapsing energy sector, global currency concerns, and continued economic uncertainty abroad, this could be an area of concern moving into the second quarter of 2015. One of the most prominent storylines within the financial technology sector in the first quarter was the escalating bets made on payments solutions by the likes of tech giants Apple, Google, and Samsung. The release of Apple Pay unilaterally raised the stakes across the industry and was a catalyst for a wave of high-profile announcements, including Samsung’s acquisition of LoopPay, Google’s acquisition of Softcard, and PayPal’s acquisition of Paydiant. Traditional payments providers are thus being further pressured to accelerate innovation and expand international reach, which has in turn refocused corporate strategies away from building domestic scale and vertical plays toward acquiring differentiated, earlier-stage, technology platforms with global capabilities. Global’s acquisition of Realex, Worldpay’s acquisition of SecureNet, and MasterCard’s acquisition of TNS’s gateway are recent examples of this trend, which we believe will be a significant driver of sector M&A activity going forward. -
Chargebacks | Banking Ombudsman Scheme
Chargebacks Cardholders need a valid reason in seeking a refund on a disputed transaction. If you make a payment with a credit or debit card through the Visa or MasterCard payment platform, you can ask your bank to charge the transaction back to the merchant’s bank, which will then debit the merchant’s account. Note: payments processed through EFTPOS cannot be charged back. You have no automatic right to demand a chargeback, but it is industry practice to charge back disputed transactions if there is a valid reason. Merchants themselves sometimes complain to us about chargebacks. Participants in card transactions Every credit or debit card transaction involves: the cardholder the merchant the card issuer – the cardholder’s bank the card company – the business operating the payment network (for example, VISA and MasterCard) the merchant’s bank, which gives the merchant the means of accepting credit card payments. Payment process When a cardholder makes a purchase, the cardholder’s bank pays the merchant’s bank and the merchant’s bank transfers the money to the merchant. The cardholder repays the bank. The only direct relationships are between the cardholder and the cardholder’s bank, and the merchant and the merchant’s bank. These relationships are governed by the respective conditions of use. There is no direct relationship between the issuing bank and merchant bank, and no contract between cardholder and card company. The card issuer, merchant’s bank and card company are involved to the extent they provide technology to enable payments to be made between them. Card-issuing banks and merchant banks link up with international card companies (usually VISA or MasterCard), which are the central link in facilitating transactions. -
Carecredit Card Acceptance Agreement for Participating Professionals
CARECREDIT CARD ACCEPTANCE AGREEMENT FOR PARTICIPATING PROFESSIONALS Synchrony Bank located at 170 Election Road, Suite 125, Draper, UT 84020, (“Bank”) has established an open-end private label and general purpose credit card program for clients/patients of health care professionals (the “Program”). Under the Program, clients/patients may finance the purchase of goods and services provided by health care professionals who have applied to Bank and been approved for participation in the Program. For purposes of this Agreement, each such approved health care professional and any professional services corporation or other entity that submitted an application and was approved by Bank to participate in the Program, are collectively referred to herein as “Professional”. Under the Program, Professional will process credit applications by which clients/patients apply to Bank to establish private label credit accounts (“Private Label Accounts” or “Accounts”) and will accept private label credit cards and general purpose credit cards issued under the Program (“Private Label Cards” and “General Purpose Cards”, respectively, and together, “Program Cards”), all in accordance with the terms set forth below, including mandatory arbitration of disputes between us, instead of class actions or jury trials. This Agreement supersedes and replaces in its entirety any previous agreement concerning the establishment of Program-related Accounts and the acceptance of Program Cards by Professional. If Professional is a new participant in the Program, this Agreement