DOCSLIB.ORG

Supreme Court Nominee Report: First Look

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supreme Court Nominee Report: First Look Supreme Court Nominee Report: First Look Brett ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE ALLIANCE FOR Kavanaugh WWW.AFJ.ORG CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, 1 HEALTH CARE, 2 Reproductive Rights, 3 Presidential Power, 5 Consumer Rights, 7 ENVIRONMENT, 8 WORKERS’ RIGHTS, 9 CIVIL RIGHTS, 10 GUN Violence, 12 IMMIGRATION, 12 NATIONAL SECURITY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES, 13 CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 15 Conclusion, 16 WWW.AFJ.ORG PAGE 1 would show the independence of thought necessary for a seat” as a EXECUTIVE federal judge.1 It took three years for Kavanaugh, a SUMMARY highly partisan and controversial nominee, to be confirmed to the D.C. On June 27, 2018, Justice Anthony Circuit seat. Prior to his nomination, Kennedy announced his intention to Kavanaugh’s career as a partisan retire from the U.S. Supreme Court on political operative blossomed. He July 31. The announcement created an worked for Republicans on the election opportunity for President Donald Trump recount at the heart of the Bush v. Gore to make a second appointment to the case;2 helped with the investigation of high court following the appointment of President Bill Clinton’s relationship with Justice Neil Gorsuch in 2017, and to Monica Lewinsky;3 drafted grounds for cement a 5-4 conservative majority on President Clinton’s impeachment with the Court for decades to come. The Independent Counsel Ken Starr;4 led stakes for the Court and for the nation the independent counsel’s were immediately thrown into sharp investigation into the alleged murder of relief: the future of access to health care, Vince Foster;5 and served as a lawyer for to reproductive rights, and to civil rights Jeb Bush.6 that had been gradually won over many decades are clearly in jeopardy. Within Kavanaugh also served for five years as days, on July 9, President Trump a top official in the George W. Bush nominated D.C. Circuit Court Judge Brett White House, working in the White Michael Kavanaugh for the seat to be House Counsel’s office and as White 7 vacated by Kennedy, confirming the House Staff Secretary. As Kavanaugh Administration’s intent to push the high described in his April 2004 court farther to the right. This report confirmation hearing, “throughout my reflects the results of a preliminary look career in the White House as Staff at Kavanaugh’s record, which forms the Secretary, one of my jobs is to be the basis for Alliance for Justice’s (AFJ) strong honest broker for competing views opposition to his confirmation. that come in on memos to the President.”8 While he concluded that It is worth noting that AFJ also opposed his job was “ultimately to carry out the Kavanaugh’s appointment to the D.C. direction of my superiors without Circuit when he was first nominated by regard to whether I might have President George W. Bush in July of chosen a different path,” he also 2003. In opposing his confirmation to acknowledged that “my job is to give the circuit court, AFJ wrote that recommendations and advice[.]”9 “Kavanaugh’s career is distinguished (emphasis added) only by its extreme partisanship. There is nothing in his record to suggest that he WWW.AFJ.ORG PAGE 2 Kavanaugh’s service in the White House is for decades to come, simply could not of exceptional interest and relevance be higher. today, as he aspires to join the nation’s highest court. His tenure there overlapped with numerous controversial Bush HEALTH CARE Administration policies and decisions, including those involving warrantless President Trump explicitly stated he was wiretapping, torture, and the use of looking for nominees who are hostile to signing statements. He was reportedly the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Trump involved in internal discussions about the said “my judicial appointments will do Bush Administration’s unconstitutional the right thing unlike Bush’s appointee detention policies, and senators have John Roberts on ObamaCare.” Brett previously accused Kavanaugh of Kavanaugh meets Donald Trump’s test. “misleading” the Senate Judiciary Committee during his previous Tragically, the stakes for the health and confirmation hearings about his wellbeing of millions of people are all too involvement in these issues. Most real. Since the Republican Congress documents from this period of his career failed in its attempts to repeal the have yet to be released. Affordable Care Act, Trump is trying now to use the courts to do so. Trump’s In the meantime, this summary report Justice Department has already attacked examines key issue areas Kavanaugh the law that ensures insurance addressed during his twelve years as a companies cannot deny coverage or judge. There is no shortage of troubling charge higher rates to people with indicators; his writings and rulings preexisting conditions. Trump’s legal attack the right to health care, to attack would reportedly take health care reproductive freedom, to clean air and away from 52 million Americans, water, and to fair wages and safe including cancer survivors, people with working conditions – all highly diabetes, and pregnant women. As the significant issues in every state in the American Medical Association and other country. In addition, Kavanaugh’s physician groups made clear, it “would writings and statements exhibit his have a devastating impact on doctors, belief that there are instances in which patients, and the American health care the President should not be subjected system as a whole.” to the rule of law that applies to ordinary citizens: that there are, in fact, instances On July 3, 2018, one of Kavanaugh’s in which the President should be above former law clerks wrote an article the law. The danger of this view at a titled “Brett Kavanaugh Said time when the President himself seems Obamacare Was Unprecedented And disdainful of the rule of law cannot be Unlawful.” In the article, describing overstated. Kavanaugh’s dissent in Seven-Sky v. Holder, 661 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2011), where In short, the consequences of this the D.C. Circuit upheld the nomination for the American people, WWW.AFJ.ORG PAGE 3 constitutionality of the Affordable Care from being decided until the first ACA Act, the clerk argued: “taxes” were imposed and collected. He also commented that the ACA was Kavanaugh’s thorough and “a law that is unprecedented on the principled takedown of the federal level in American history”10 and mandate was indeed a roadmap for “could usher in a significant expansion the Supreme Court—the Supreme of congressional authority with no Court dissenters, justices Antonin obvious principled limit.”11 Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito, who Additionally, in Sissel v. HHS, 799 F.3d explained that the mandate 1035 (D.C. Cir. 2015), challengers violated the Constitution. I am very claimed that the ACA violated the familiar with that opinion, because I Origination Clause, which says that all served as Kennedy’s law clerk that bills for raising revenue must originate term. I can tell you with certainty in the House. A three-judge panel of that the only justices following a the D.C. Circuit dismissed the case, roadmap from Brett Kavanaugh and Kavanaugh dissented from the were the ones who said Obamacare denial of rehearing en banc. was unconstitutional. (italics in Kavanaugh issued a complicated original; emphasis added) opinion that three of his fellow judges on the D.C. Circuit criticized as On July 3, 2018, another former “flawed,” “empty formalism,” and Kavanaugh clerk wrote, “[a]lthough he “misread[ing] the Supreme Court's ultimately determined that a Origination Clause precedent.”12 challenge to Obamacare had to be brought later, he left no doubt about where he stood. No other contender on President Trump’s list is on record Reproductive so vigorously criticizing the law.” (emphasis added) Indeed, Kavanaugh dissented from Rights two rulings upholding the Affordable Care Act. In Seven-Sky v. Holder, President Trump has repeatedly Kavanaugh dissented from a decision reminded us that he will only put justices concluding that the court had on the Supreme Court who pass his jurisdiction to decide the litmus test of gutting and overturning constitutionality of the ACA and that Roe v. Wade. The President said the ACA was ultimately constitutional. overturning Roe “will happen In his dissent, Kavanaugh argued that automatically . because I am putting the court did not have jurisdiction to pro-life justices on the court.” We should address the merits of the law because believe him. the Anti-Injunction Act barred the suit WWW.AFJ.ORG PAGE 4 The evidence available on Brett Kavanaugh’s order, Kavanaugh argued in Kavanaugh’s record to date reinforces this dissent that the D.C. Circuit created “a conclusion. As one of Kavanaugh’s former new right for unlawful immigrant minors clerks wrote in the National Review on July in U.S. Government detention to obtain 3, 2018: immediate abortion on demand, thereby barring any Government efforts to On the vital issues of protecting expeditiously transfer the minors to their religious liberty and enforcing immigration sponsors before they make restrictions on abortion, no court-of- that momentous life decision.”15 As Judge appeals judge in the nation has a Millett stated, however, “[w]e are told that stronger, more consistent record than waiting even another week could Judge Brett Kavanaugh. On these issues, increase the risk to J.D.'s health, the as on so many others, he has fought for potential complexity of the procedure, his principles and stood firm against and the great difficulty of locating an pressure. He would do the same on the abortion provider in Texas.”16 Supreme Court. Judge Kavanaugh has a clear, consistent, and rock-solid Also notable is the fact that just one record on the issues that matter most to month before this decision, in social conservatives.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SUMMER | 2021 Lawyering in the Age of Covid-19 Lawyering in Theageof American College of Trial Lawyers JOURNAL
    ISSUE 96 | SUMMER | 2021 Lawyering in theageof Covid-19 American College of Trial Lawyers JOURNAL Chancellor-Founder Hon. Emil Gumpert contents (1895-1982) 02 04 05 OFFICERS Letter from the Editor Annual Meeting President’s The College RODNEY ACKER President Announcement Perspective Welcomes New MICHAEL L. O’DONNELL President-Elect Officers & Regents SUSAN J. HARRIMAN Treasurer WILLIAM J. MURPHY Secretary DOUGLAS R. YOUNG Immediate Past President MEETING RECAP BOARD OF REGENTS 09 15 19 25 RODNEY ACKER DAN S. FOLLUO CLE: The 25th Anniversary The Honorable Brian Brurud - Check 6 Scientific Collaboration in Dallas, Texas Tulsa, Oklahoma of the VMI Case: Mark E. Recktenwald – Access to The Fight Against Covid-19 PETER AKMAJIAN LARRY H. KRANTZ Remembering RBG Justice In the Age Of COVID Tucson, Arizona New York, New York SUSAN S. BREWER MARTIN F. MURPHY Morgantown, West Virginia Boston, Massachusetts JOE R. CALDWELL, JR. WILLIAM J. MURPHY Washington, D.C. Baltimore, Maryland 31 37 41 47 JOHN A. DAY MICHAEL L. O’DONNELL Brentwood, Tennessee Denver, Colorado The Importance of Dr. Patrick Connor — A Conversation With Never Out Of The Fight — Separate Opinions — Treating Panthers the Former President the Eddie Gallagher RICHARD H. DEANE, JR. LYN P. PRUITT Professor Melvin Urofsky of the United States Court Martial Atlanta, Georgia Little Rock, Arkansas MONA T. DUCKETT, Q.C. JEFFREY E. STONE Edmonton, Alberta Chicago, Illinois GREGORY M. LEDERER MICHAEL J. SHEPARD Cedar Rapids, Iowa San Francisco, California 53 59 65 67 Michele Bratcher Goodwin Defending the Skies — Heather Younger — Spring 2021 SANDRA A. FORBES CATHERINE RECKER — Quarantine: The Reach and General Victor Eugene Building Resistence Induction Ceremony Toronto, Ontario Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Limits of Government Action Renuart, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • True Spies Episode 45 - the Profiler
    True Spies Episode 45 - The Profiler NARRATOR Welcome ... to True Spies. ​ ​ Week by week, mission by mission, you’ll hear the true stories behind the world’s greatest espionage operations. You’ll meet the people who navigate this secret world. What do they know? What are their skills? And what would YOU do in their position? This is True Spies. ​ ​ NARRATOR CLEMENTE: With any equivocal death investigation, you have no idea where the investigation is going to take you, but in this particular investigation, it starts at the White House. That makes it incredibly difficult to conduct an investigation, when you know that two of the people that are intimately involved in it are the First Lady and the President of the United States. NARRATOR This is True Spies, Episode 45, The Profiler. ​ ​ This story begins with an ending. CLEMENTE: On the evening of January 20th, 1993, Vince Foster was found dead of by gunshot wound at the top of an earthen berm in Fort Marcy Park. NARRATOR A life cut short in a picturesque, wooded park 10 minutes outside of the US capital. He was found by someone walking through the park who then called the US park police. The park police and EMTs responded to the scene and the coroner then arrived and pronounced Foster dead. And his body was removed. NARRATOR A body, anonymous – housed in an expensive woolen suit, a crisp white dress shirt. A vivid bloodstain on the right shoulder. When they then searched his car that was in the parking lot they found a pass to the White House.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas Connections: a Time­Line of the Clinton Years by Sam Smith
    9/28/2016 Arkansas Connections: A Time­line of the Clinton Years by Sam Smith CLINTON E­MAIL INDEX UNDERNEWS ARCHIVES US Arkansas Connections A CHART THAT APPEARED IN THE PROGRESSIVE REVIEW, MAY 1992 The media tried to turn the Clinton story into Camelot II. Just the truth would have made life easier for all of us. And a much better tale as well. Sam Smith COPYRIGHT 1998 THE PROGRESSIVE REVIEW Updated January 2001 and periodically thereafter http://prorev.com/connex.htm 1/47 9/28/2016 Arkansas Connections: A Time­line of the Clinton Years by Sam Smith 1950s When Bill Clinton is 7, his family moves from Hope, Arkansas, to the long­time mob resort of Hot Springs, AR. Here Al Capone is said to have had permanent rights to suite 443 of the Arlington Hotel. Clinton's stepfather is a gun­ brandishing alcoholic who loses his Buick franchise through mismanagement and his own pilfering. He physically abuses his family, including the young Bill. His mother is a heavy gambler with mob ties. According to FBI and local police officials, his Uncle Raymond ­­ to whom young Bill turns for wisdom and support ­­ is a colorful car dealer, slot machine owner and gambling operator, who thrives (except when his house is firebombed) on the fault line of criminality. Paul Bosson, Hot Springs Prosecutor ­ In Hot Springs, growing up here, you were living a lie. You lived a lie because you knew that all of these activities were illegal. I mean, as soon as you got old enough to be able to read a newspaper, you knew that gambling in Arkansas was illegal, prostitution was illegal.
    [Show full text]
  • Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh: His Jurisprudence and Potential Impact on the Supreme Court
    Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh: His Jurisprudence and Potential Impact on the Supreme Court Andrew Nolan, Coordinator Section Research Manager Caitlain Devereaux Lewis, Coordinator Legislative Attorney August 21, 2018 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R45293 SUMMARY R45293 Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh: His Jurisprudence August 21, 2018 and Potential Impact on the Supreme Court Andrew Nolan, On July 9, 2018, President Donald J. Trump announced the nomination of Judge Brett M. Coordinator Kavanaugh of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) to fill Section Research Manager retiring Justice Anthony M. Kennedy’s seat on the Supreme Court of the United States. [email protected] Nominated to the D.C. Circuit by President George W. Bush, Judge Kavanaugh has served on Caitlain Devereaux Lewis, that court for more than twelve years. In his role as a Circuit Judge, the nominee has authored Coordinator roughly three hundred opinions (including majority opinions, concurrences, and dissents) and Legislative Attorney adjudicated numerous high-profile cases concerning, among other things, the status of wartime [email protected] detainees held by the United States at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; the constitutionality of the current structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau; the validity of rules issued by the For a copy of the full report, Environmental Protection Agency under the Clean Air Act; and the legality of the Federal please call 7-5700 or visit Communications Commission’s net neutrality rule. Since joining the D.C. Circuit, Judge www.crs.gov. Kavanaugh has also taught courses on the separation of powers, national security law, and constitutional interpretation at Harvard Law School, Yale Law School, and the Georgetown University Law Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Justice Webb Hubbell 1984
    Arkansas Supreme Court Project Arkansas Supreme Court Historical Society Interview with Justice Webster Lee Hubbell Little Rock, Arkansas May 23 and 24, 2015 Interviewer: Ernest Dumas Ernest Dumas: All right. I am Ernie Dumas and I’m interviewing Webb Hubbell. This interview is being held at the Adolphine Terry Library in Little Rock, Arkansas, in Pulaski County on May 23, 2015. The audio recording of this interview will be donated to the David and Barbara Pryor Center for the Arkansas Oral and Visual History at the University of Arkansas and it’s explicitly done for the Arkansas Supreme Court Historical Society. The recording, transcript and any other related materials will be deposited and preserved forever in the Special Collections Department at the University of Arkansas Libraries Fayetteville. And the copyright will belong solely to the Arkansas Supreme Court Historical Society and to the University of Arkansas. Webb, please state your name— your full name—and spell it and give your indication that you’re willing to give the Pryor Center and the Supreme Court Historical Society permission to make this audio and the transcript available to whomever. Webb Hubbell: OK. My full name is Webster Lee Hubbell. W-E-B-S-T-E-R Lee, L-E-E, Hubbell, H-U-B-B-E-L-L. And I fully give my consent for the Pryor Center or the Supreme Court Foundation or Endowment. ED: OK. WH: Or to do whatever they want to with this interview. ED: All right. Well, we appreciate you doing this. You obviously lived an amazing life full of peaks and valleys.
    [Show full text]
  • The Clinton Administration and the Erosion of Executive Privilege Jonathan Turley
    Maryland Law Review Volume 60 | Issue 1 Article 11 Paradise Losts: the Clinton Administration and the Erosion of Executive Privilege Jonathan Turley Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr Part of the President/Executive Department Commons Recommended Citation Jonathan Turley, Paradise Losts: the Clinton Administration and the Erosion of Executive Privilege, 60 Md. L. Rev. 205 (2001) Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/mlr/vol60/iss1/11 This Conference is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maryland Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PARADISE LOST: THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION AND THE EROSION OF EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE JONATHAN TuRLEY* INTRODUCTION In Paradise Lost, Milton once described a "Serbonian Bog ... [w]here Armies whole have sunk."' This illusion could have easily been taken from the immediate aftermath of the Clinton crisis. On a myriad of different fronts, the Clinton defense teams advanced sweep- ing executive privilege arguments, only to be defeated in a series of judicial opinions. This "Serbonian Bog" ultimately proved to be the greatest factor in undoing efforts to combat inquiries into the Presi- dent's conduct in the Lewinsky affair and the collateral scandals.2 More importantly, it proved to be the undoing of years of effort to protect executive privilege from risky assertions or judicial tests.' In the course of the Clinton litigation, courts imposed a series of new * J.B. & Maurice C.
    [Show full text]
  • Filling the D.C. Circuit Vacancies Carl W
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Law Faculty Publications School of Law 2015 Filling the D.C. Circuit Vacancies Carl W. Tobias University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/law-faculty-publications Part of the Courts Commons, Judges Commons, and the President/Executive Department Commons Recommended Citation Carl W. Tobias, Filling the D.C. Circuit Vacancies, 91 Ind. L.J. 121 (2015). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INDIANA LAW JOURNAL Volume 91 Number 1 Early Winter 2015 © Copyright 2015 by the Trustees of Indiana University CONTENTS SYMPOSIUM: ACADEMIC FREEDOM FOR THE NEXT 100 YEARS FOREW ORD .............................................................................. Steve Sanders 1 THE SOCIAL VALUE OF ACADEMIC FREEDOM DEFENDED ...... J. PeterByrne 5 ACADEMIC DUTY AND ACADEMIC FREEDOM .............................. Amy Gajda 17 THE REGRETTABLE UNDERENFORCEMENT OF INCOMPETENCE AS CAUSE To DISMISS TENURED FACULTY ............... David M Rabban 39 AAUP 1915 STATEMENT ON ACADEMIC FREEDOM ....................................... 57 ARTICLES THE GOVERNMENT'S LIES AND THE CONSTITUTION ................ Helen Norton 73 FILLING THE D.C. CIRCUIT VACANCIES ...................................... Carl Tobias 121 NOTES INCENTIVIZING THE PROTECTION OF PERSONALLY IDENTIFYING CONSUMER DATA AFTER THE HOME DEPOT BREACH ............................... Ryan F. Manion 143 No ORDINARY FISH TALE: WORKING TOWARD A TRANSNATIONAL SOLUTION TO THE COD CRISIS IN THE GULF OF MAINE ............ Michael Ruderman 165 Filling the D.C. Circuit Vacancies CARL TOBIAS* IN TR OD UCTION .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Whitewater Development Corporation and Related Matters
    104TH CONGRESS REPORT 2d Session SENATE 104±280 "! INVESTIGATION OF WHITEWATER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND RELATED MATTERS F I N A L R E P O R T OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE WHITEWATER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND RELATED MATTERS TOGETHER WITH ADDITIONAL AND MINORITY VIEWS JUNE 17, 1996.ÐOrdered to be printed Filed under authority of the order of the Senate of June 13, 1996 INVESTIGATION OF WHITEWATER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND RELATED MATTERSÐFINAL REPORT 1 104TH CONGRESS REPORT 2d Session SENATE 104±280 "! INVESTIGATION OF WHITEWATER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND RELATED MATTERS F I N A L R E P O R T OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE WHITEWATER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND RELATED MATTERS TOGETHER WITH ADDITIONAL AND MINORITY VIEWS JUNE 17, 1996.ÐOrdered to be printed Filed under authority of the order of the Senate of June 13, 1996 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 25±225 WASHINGTON : 1996 SPECIAL COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE WHITEWATER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND RELATED MATTERS ALFONSE M. D'AMATO, New York, Chairman RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut CONNIE MACK, Florida JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts LAUCH FAIRCLOTH, North Carolina RICHARD H. BRYAN, Nevada ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah BARBARA BOXER, California ROD GRAMS, Minnesota CAROL MOSELEY-BRAUN, Illinois PETE V. DOMENICI,* New Mexico PATTY MURRAY, Washington ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah PAUL SIMON, Illinois FRANK H. MURKOWSKI, Alaska HOWARD A. MENELL, Staff Director ROBERT J. GIUFFRA, Jr., Chief Counsel PHILIP E. BECHTEL, Deputy Staff Director STEVEN B. HARRIS, Democratic Staff Director and Chief Counsel MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Special Counsel RICHARD BEN-VENISTE, Democratic Special Counsel ALICE S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Independent Counsel Investigation, the Impeachment Proceedings, and President Clinton's Defense
    Fordham Law Review Volume 68 Issue 3 Article 7 1999 The Independent Counsel Investigation, the Impeachment Proceedings, and President Clinton's Defense: Inquiries into the Role and Responsibilities of Lawyers, Symposium, Dead Man's Privilege: Vince Foster and the Demise of Legal Ethics Michael Stokes Paulsen Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Independent Counsel Investigation, the Impeachment Proceedings, and President Clinton's Defense: Inquiries into the Role and Responsibilities of Lawyers, Symposium, Dead Man's Privilege: Vince Foster and the Demise of Legal Ethics, 68 Fordham L. Rev. 807 (1999). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol68/iss3/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Independent Counsel Investigation, the Impeachment Proceedings, and President Clinton's Defense: Inquiries into the Role and Responsibilities of Lawyers, Symposium, Dead Man's Privilege: Vince Foster and the Demise of Legal Ethics Cover Page Footnote Briggs & Morgan Professor of Law, University of Minnesota School of Law. My thanks to Patrick Schlitz, John Nagle, Daniel Farber, Geoffrey Stone, Susan Wolf, William Hodes, and David McGowan for their valuable comments and suggestions, and to Jay Pralle for his resourceful research. This article is available in Fordham Law Review: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol68/iss3/7 DEAD MAN'S PRIVILEGE: VINCE FOSTER AND THE DEMISE OF LEGAL ETHICS Michael Stokes Paulsen INTRODUCTION T HE facts are worthy of a Grisham legal thriller or a Shakespearean tragedy, and seem to partake of elements of both.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Killed Vince Foster?
    ~~~ ~~ ~ -Hillary does. The great first continued to refer to Foster’s Who Killed impression was a long time ago. killing as a “suicide“; from But we may also be getting to Vince Foster? then on, general speculation know Hillary. What has already shifted to possible reasons or emerged about her Whitewater by Murray N. Rothbard signs of Foster’s supposed doings shows how very true it is ”depression” that had led him that greedy people were break- You read it first in RRR to this alleged act. ing the law to make money [I’ Foster g a t e,” September The dismissal of the Foster during the Reagan years, just 19931. More and more, it looks slaying as a “suicide” suc- as the Clintons have always as if the key to Whitewatergate ceeded in burying the Foster said. Her secret life in Arkansas and to much else that is rotten Affair for several months. is coming as a surprise even to in the Clinton Administration Then, in early December, the her critics, who have tended to centers on the mysterious Foster death, along with see her as a sort of fanatic and slaying on July 20 of the White Whitewatergate, came rapidly to credit her with afanatic‘smoral House counsel and long-time to the fore. It was discovered integrity. But the key to her is lover/and partner of Hillary that chief White House coun- ambition-a passion that has Rod ham, Vincent Fos t e r, sel Bernard Nussbaum had consistently subdued her sup- Jr. What do we know about spirited out of Foster’s White posed feminism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vince Foster Case
    THE VINCE FOSTER CASE http://www.prorev.com/foster.htm P R O G R E S S I V E R E V I E W INDEX UNDERNEWS MAIL US 101 Peculiarities Surrounding the Death of Vincent Foster Richard L. Franklin Please bear in mind that the purpose of this catalog is rather modest. I merely want to highlight what I see as a large number of gross "peculiarities" surrounding the Foster case. I hope to convey to the reader some sense of the sheer weight of over 100 discrepancies and unanswered questions. Also bear in mind that the number "101" is itself a modest number. As a practical matter, I was forced to omit dozens of striking anomalies. As you read this long list, consider that Vince Foster's death was almost immediately labeled a suicide by the U.S. Park Police. Normal procedure in the case of a violent death is to treat it as a homicide until all doubts are resolved. Despite this, a homicide investigation was never launched. Even before the death scene or the body had been inspected, a suicide confirmation process was under way. In her sworn Senate testimony, senior Park Police officer Cheryl Braun said, "We made that determination [of suicide] prior to going up and looking at the body." From that point on, all police and FBI efforts were directed toward collecting evidence that would support the suicide verdict. No effort has ever been made to seek or collect evidence supporting a possible homicide. Instead of seeing a proper homicide investigation, we have seen Foster's death become mired in a morass of lies, confusion, and conflicting evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Cies Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2000 Hearings
    S. HRG. 106±147 DEPARTMENTS OF COMMERCE, JUSTICE, AND STATE, THE JUDICIARY, AND RELATED AGEN- CIES APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON H.R. 2670/S. 1217 AN ACT MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENTS OF COM- MERCE, JUSTICE, AND STATE, THE JUDICIARY, AND RELATED AGEN- CIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Department of Commerce Nondepartmental witnesses Department of Justice Securities and Exchange Federal Communications Commission Commission Small Business Administration Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 54±206 cc WASHINGTON : 1999 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington, DC 20402 ISBN 0±16±059465±0 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS TED STEVENS, Alaska, Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont SLADE GORTON, Washington FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky TOM HARKIN, Iowa CONRAD BURNS, Montana BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama HARRY REID, Nevada JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire HERB KOHL, Wisconsin ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah PATTY MURRAY, Washington BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota LARRY CRAIG, Idaho DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois JON KYL, Arizona STEVEN J. CORTESE, Staff Director LISA SUTHERLAND, Deputy Staff Director JAMES H.
    [Show full text]