City of Brantford Comments on the Provincial Consultation: Growing the Size of the Greenbelt (ERO Posting 019-3136) [Financial Impact – None]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

City of Brantford Comments on the Provincial Consultation: Growing the Size of the Greenbelt (ERO Posting 019-3136) [Financial Impact – None] Alternative formats and communication supports available upon request. Please contact [email protected] or 519-759-4150 for assistance. Date April 13, 2021 Report No. 2021-248 To Chair and Members Committee of the Whole - Operations and Administration From Nicole Wilmot, Director of Planning People, Legislated Services and Planning 1.0 Type of Report Consent Item [X] Item For Consideration [X] 2.0 Topic City of Brantford Comments on the Provincial Consultation: Growing the Size of the Greenbelt (ERO Posting 019-3136) [Financial Impact – none] 3.0 Recommendation A. THAT Report 2021-248 titled “City of Brantford Comments on the Provincial Consultation: Growing the Size of the Greenbelt (ERO Posting 019-3136)”, BE RECEIVED; and B. THAT the City Clerk BE DIRECTED to forward a copy of Report 2021- 248 to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing and Will Bouma, MPP, Brantford-Brant as the City of Brantford’s official comments in response to ERO Posting 019-3136. 4.0 Executive Summary The Province has requested feedback on ways to grow and further enhance the quality of the Greenbelt, including a Study Area focused on the Paris Galt Moraine, and ideas for adding, expanding and further protecting Urban River Valleys. The Study Area does not include the City of Brantford; however it is Report No. 2021-248 Page 2 April 13, 2021 adjacent to the northwest municipal boundary of Brantford. In addition, the consultation does not specifically contemplate adding an Urban River Valley in Brantford. It is to be noted that the discharge of water to the Grand River from Paris Galt Moraine improves the quality and quality of source water for Brantford’s drinking water supply. This Report provides Planning Staff’s comments in regard to this consultation. The City of Brantford is supportive of the Greenbelt in principle and protections for natural heritage features and agricultural land. However, similar to comments submitted to the Province in 2018 regarding a previous proposal to expand the Greenbelt, the City already has comprehensive policies in place to protect these features within Brantford, established in the new Official Plan recently adopted by Council and the Grand River Source Protection Plan. Therefore, expanding the Study Area for growing the Greenbelt into the City’s municipal boundary, and the addition of an Urban River Valley designation within Brantford, are not necessary and redundant. It may also jeopardize the Province’s timely approval of the new Official Plan recently adopted by Council, including the proposed Settlement Area expansion in the northwest area. If an expanded Study Area or additional Urban River Valleys are contemplated within the municipal boundaries of Brantford in the future, the Province should provide the City with additional opportunities for consultation. 5.0 Purpose and Overview The purpose of this Report is to provide the City of Brantford’s comments to the Province regarding the Growing the Greenbelt initiative, including the proposed Study Area and considerations for adding new Urban River Valleys. Additional comments may be required in the future when the Province seeks feedback on a more specific Greenbelt expansion proposal within a finalized Study Area. 6.0 Background 6.1 Request for Comments on Growing the Greenbelt (ERO Posting 019-3136) On February 17, 2021, the Province of Ontario released a request for feedback on ways to grow and further enhance the quality of the Greenbelt, with a priority of: A Study Area of lands focused on the Paris Galt Moraine, as shown in Appendix A, which is home to critical groundwater resources; and Report No. 2021-248 Page 3 April 13, 2021 Ideas for adding, expanding and further protecting Urban River Valleys, which are publicly owned lands in river valleys within an urban context, as shown in Appendix B. The complete posting on the Environmental Registry of Ontario is available at https://ero.ontario.ca/notice/019-3136. The deadline for submitting comments is April 19, 2021. The Greenbelt is a broad band of protected land that is established under the Greenbelt Act, 2005. The Greenbelt is covered by the policies of the Greenbelt Plan, the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, and the Niagara Escarpment Plan, which identify where urbanization should not occur to provide permanent protection to the agricultural land base and the ecological and hydrological features, areas, and functions occurring on this landscape. The City of Brantford is not currently located within or adjacent to the existing Greenbelt or subject to the Greenbelt Plan, the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan, or the Niagara Escarpment Plan. Brantford is subject to A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (the Growth Plan). The Study Area released by the Province as part of the current consultation to grow the Greenbelt is focused on the Paris Galt Moraine, which runs generally from Caledon in the northeast to Brantford in the southwest. The Study Area does not include the City of Brantford or Settlement Areas within other municipalities also subject to the Growth Plan; however it is adjacent to the northwest municipal boundary of Brantford. The Paris Galt Moraine is an area of rolling, hilly terrain comprised of sand and gravel deposits that is the headwaters for many rivers and streams. Moraines allow rain and snowmelt to soak into the ground more rapidly and in much greater amounts than the surrounding, less permeable areas. The Paris Galt Moraine helps to protect and recharge groundwater aquifers and provides baseflow to rivers and streams, including the Grand River which is the source of Brantford’s drinking water supply. The Urban River Valley designation in the Greenbelt Plan applies to publicly owned lands in 21 river valleys within an urban context, connecting the Greenbelt to Lake Ontario in the Greater Golden Horseshoe. Urban River Valleys are often lands designated in municipal official plans for parks, open space, recreation, conservation and/or environmental protection. The Province notes that there may be opportunities for additional Urban River Valleys to be added to the Report No. 2021-248 Page 4 April 13, 2021 Greenbelt or existing ones to be expanded to include additional publicly owned land. In particular, the Province is seeking feedback on adding new Urban River Valleys to provide connections to the Paris Galt Moraine through the Speed and Eramosa Rivers in the urban areas of Guelph and Cambridge. The Province has not specifically identified any potential Urban River Valleys in Brantford, such as the Grand River, for inclusion in the Greenbelt Plan. 6.2 Previous Comments to the Province The Province previously initiated public consultation regarding growing the Greenbelt in December 2017. At that time, the Study Area for a potential expansion of the Greenbelt included much of the northern Boundary Expansion Lands that were transferred from the County of Brant to the City of Brantford through the Municipal Boundary Adjustment approved by the Province in 2017. Planning Staff outlined a number of concerns with a potential expansion of the Greenbelt into Brantford’s northern Boundary Expansion Lands in Report CD2018-033, attached as Appendix C. Since growing the Greenbelt into Brantford’s northern Boundary Expansion Lands would have prohibited a future Settlement Area expansion, these concerns were largely centred around the conflict the Greenbelt would have with the provincially approved municipal boundary adjustment, including the following: The inability of the City to meet population and employment forecasts and intensification and density targets set by the Province in the Growth Plan; The inability of the City to gain the anticipated growth in assessment value in order to fulfill the City’s contractual requirement to compensate Brant County for the Boundary Expansion Lands; and The disruption to the City’s ongoing Official Plan Review and Municipal Comprehensive Review, which was planned to include extensive technical analysis on water resources and natural heritage features. On February 27, 2018, Council passed the following resolution to serve as the City’s official comments on that consultation: A. THAT Report CD2018-033, City of Brantford Comments on the Provincial Initiative: Protecting Water for Future Generations – Growing the Greenbelt in the Outer Ring, BE RECEIVED; Report No. 2021-248 Page 5 April 13, 2021 B. THAT the Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs BE ADVISED that the official comments from the City of Brantford in regard to the Provincial Initiative: Protecting Water for Future Generations – Growing the Greenbelt in the Outer Ring are as follows: i. The City of Brantford DOES NOT SUPPORT the inclusion of any City of Brantford lands within the Study Area for the Expansion of the Greenbelt in the Outer Ring for the reasons outlined in Report CD2018-033; and ii. The City of Brantford DOES NOT SUPPORT any future extension of the Greenbelt into the City of Brantford’s municipal boundary for the reasons outlined in Report CD2018-033; C. THAT a copy of Report CD2018-033 BE APPENDED to the City’s official comments submitted to the Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs; and D. THAT a copy of the City’s letter to the Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs, including a copy of Report CD2018-033, BE FORWARDED to Phil McColeman, MP, Brantford-Brant and Dave Levac, MPP, Brant. The Province did not make any changes to the size of the Greenbelt as a result of the 2017/2018 consultation. As noted previously, the Study Area being considered through the current consultation excludes all lands located within the City of Brantford, including the northern Boundary Expansion Lands. 7.0 Corporate Policy Context This Report is related to two of the desired outcomes outlined in City Council’s priorities for 2021-2022. Desired Outcome 5: Growth is successfully accommodated in expansion lands. Desired Outcome 7: The City is mitigating its environmental footprint and adapting to climate change.
Recommended publications
  • Online Voting in Ontario's Municipal Elections a Conflict of Legal Principles and Technology?
    Online Voting in Ontario's Municipal Elections A Conflict of Legal Principles and Technology? Authored by Anthony Cardillo Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Aleksander Essex, PhD., P.Eng. Western University, Canada Associate Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Western University, Canada Nicholas Akinyokun School of Computing and Information Systems The University of Melbourne, Australia PUBLICATION NOTE An extended abstract of this report was presented at the Fourth International Joint Conference on Elec‐ tronic Voting (E‐Vote‐ID) in Bregenz, Austria, October, 2019. It won the Best Paper Award in the Trackon Security, Usability and Technical Issues. Cite the extended abstract as: Anthony Cardillo, Nicholas Akinyokun, and Aleksander Essex. Online Voting in Ontario Municipal Elections: A Conflict of Legal Principles and Technology?. In: Krimmer R. et al. (eds) Electronic Voting. E‐Vote‐ID 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11759, pp. 67‐82, 2019. Cite this full report as: Anthony Cardillo, Nicholas Akinyokun, and Aleksander Essex. Online Voting in Ontario Municipal Elections: A Conflict of Legal Principles and Technology? Whisper Lab Research Report, Western University, 2020. Available online: https://whisperlab.org/ontario-online.pdf Acknowledgments We are grateful to a many individuals in Ontario and beyond for helpful conversations and important in‐ sights. Special thanks to Jane Buchanan for her tireless effort searching municipal documents. Thanks to Joe Abley, Richard Ackerman, Tony Adams, Matt Bernhard, Kevin Creechan, Faye and Ron Ego, Josh Franklin, Nicole Goodman, Jared Marcotte, Beata Martin‐Rozumiłowicz, John Meraglia, Scott Richie, Matt Saunders, Cameron Shelley, Ken Strauss, Dave Suffling, Vanessa Teague, Anne Walkinshaw, Susan Watson, Uli Watkiss.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Correspondence 2020-11-17
    /IS:1><121\ Town of Bracebridge ~ BRACEBRIDGE Council Correspondence The Heart of Muskoka TO: Mayor G. Smith and Members of Town Council S. Rettie, Chief Administrative Officer COPY: Management Team Media FROM: L. McDonald, Director of Corporate Services/Clerk DATE: November 17, 2020 CIRCULATION: Item # Description SECTION “A” – STAFF INFORMATION MEMOS: A1 Nil. SECTION “B” – GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE: Communication from the Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit, regarding the 2019-2020 B1 Annual Community Report. Communication from Mia Brown, Program Manager, Substance Use and Injury Prevention B2 Program, Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit, dated November 2020 regarding Simcoe Muskoka Opioid Strategy. Resolution from Matt MacDonald, Director of Corporate Services/City Clerk, City of Belleville, B3 dated November 10, 2020 regarding Proposing Changes to the Municipal Elections Act – Extension of Nomination Period. Resolution from Tanya Daniels, City Clerk, City of Brantford, dated November 12, 2020 B4 regarding Bill 218 – Ranked Ballots for Municipal Elections. Page 1. ANNUAL COMMUNITY REPORT Medical officer of health + Board Chair message As reported in the 2018-2019 Annual Report, the Board of Health and the What is less visible is our preventive work that sets the stage for good Medical Officer of Health were challenged, like all health units, with the health in the long term, the work that is done in our immunization and province’s plans to transform the public health system. dental programs, and our family health teams. That work has been on hold While we were unclear what the announcement was going to mean for our due to the pandemic, and we now have thousands of children who have future, we began to prepare for the possibility of significant change by both missed their Grade 7 vaccinations, hundreds of low-income families who reviewing our mandate and operations while mounting a vigorous response have been unable to access our dental clinics, and many more families who highlighting the importance of public health.
    [Show full text]
  • Blackfriars/Petersville Heritage Conservation District Study City of London, Ontario
    November 2013 DRAFT REPORT ON Blackfriars/Petersville Heritage Conservation District Study City of London, Ontario Submitted to: Don Menard, Heritage Planner City of London 300 Dufferin Avenue, London, Ontario N6B 1Z2 Report Number: 13-1151-0194-1000 Distribution: REPORT 1 copy - City of London 2 e-copies - City of London BLACKFRIARS/PETERSVILLE HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT STUDY CITY OF LONDON, ONTARIO Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Purpose and Objectives of Study......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Background ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Location ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Study Approach and Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 8 1.5 What is a Heritage Conservation District? ......................................................................................................... 10 2.0 HISTORICAL CONTEXT ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Representation 573
    PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTATION 573 1.—Representation in tbe House of Commons according to the Districts of the Representation Act, 1914r—con. Popu­ Repre­ Popu­ Repre­ Provinces and Districts. lation, senta­ Provinces and Districts. lation, senta­ 1911. tion. 1911. tion. Quebec—concluded: Ontario—con. Joliette 23,911 Dundas 25,973 Kamouraska 20,888 Durham 26,411 Labelle 31,149 Elgin E 17,597 Laprairie-Napierville 19,335 Elgin W....; 26,715 L'Assomption-Montcalm. 28,506 • Essex N.: 38,006 Laval-Deux-Montagnes... 25,275 Essex S 29,541 Levis 28,913 Fort William and Rainy L'lslet 1-6,435 River 33,626 Lotbiniere 22,158 Frontenac 21,944 Maskinonge 16,509 Glengarry and Stormont. 38,226 Matane 27,539 Grenville 17,545 Megantic 31,314 Grey N 33,957 Missiquoi : 17,466 Grey S '. 31,934 Montmagny 17,356 Haldimand 21,562 Montreal Island— Hal ton 22,208 Hochelaga 44,884 Hamilton E 39,793 Jacques Cartier 55,943 Hamilton W 37,279 Laurier-Outremont 45,176 Hastings E 24,978 Maisonneuve 33,796 Hastings W 30,825 Ste. Anne 41,541 Huron N 26,886 St. Antoine 34,794 Huron S 26,097 St. Denis 45,141 Kent 52,439 Westmount-St. Henri... 56,088 Kinsgton 20,660 St. James 44,057 Lambton E 25,779 St. Laurent-St. George. 38,883 Lambton W 29,109 George-Etienne Cartier 51,937 Lanark 34,375 St. Mary 62,521 Leeds 36,753 Nicoiet 30,055 Lennox and Addington. .. 20,386 Pontiac 29,416 Lincoln 35,429 Portneuf 30,260 London '.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly of the PROVINCE of ONTARIO
    JOURNALS OF THE Legislative Assembly OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO From the 20th to the 23rd of October, 1952 Both Days Inclusive; And from 12th of February to the 2nd of April, 1953 Both Days Inclusive IN THE FIRST AND SECOND YEARS OF THE REIGN OF OUR SOVEREIGN LADY QUEEN ELIZABETH II BEING THE Second and Third Sessions of the Twenty-Fourth Parliament of Ontario SESSIONS 1952 AND 1953 PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY VOL. LXXXVII ONTARIO TORONTO Printed and Published by Baptist Johnston, Printer to the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty 1953 INDEX Journals of the Legislative Assembly, Ontario 1 ELIZABETH II, 1952 2nd SESSION TWENTY-FOURTH PARLIAMENT OCTOBER 20th OCTOBER 23rd, 1952 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE HOUSE: Mr. Downer, Dufferin-Simcoe, appointed chairman for present session, 4. CORPORATIONS AND INCOME TAXES SUSPENSION ACT, 1952: 1. Forecast in Speech from Throne, 2. 2. Bill No. 2, introduced, 3. 2nd Reading moved and debate adjourned, 5. Debate concluded, 5. 2nd Reading, 5. House in Committee and amended, 7. 3rd Reading, 7. Royal Assent, 9. (1 Eliz. II, 2nd Ses- sion, Cap. 1.) TNEBATES IN THE HOUSE: 1. Recording of, for present session ordered, 3. 2. On motion for 2nd Reading of Bill No. 2, The Corporations and Income Taxes Suspension Act, 1952, 5. 3. On motion for 2nd Reading of Bill No. 1, The St. Lawrence Development Act, 1952 (No. 2), 5. 4. On motion to go into Committee of Supply, 6, 7. DOUCETT, HON. GEORGE: Pleasure of Members on his return to the House after a serious motor accident expressed by Prime Minister, 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Opting out of Cannabis Retail Stores
    OPTING OUT OF CANNABIS RETAIL STORES As per Ontario Regulation 468/18, municipalities must notify the AGCO of their decision to opt out by having the municipal Clerk, Chief Administrative Officer or Mayor send the AGCO Registrar written notification that the municipality has passed a resolution prohibiting cannabis retail stores. This written notification must be sent by email to [email protected] and received by the AGCO no later than January 22, 2019. The notification must include: 1. The official name of the municipality, and; 2. The date the resolution was passed. Once received, the AGCO will acknowledge receipt by email. A municipality that decides to prohibit cannabis retail stores may later reverse its decision; however, under the Cannabis Licence Act, 2018, a decision by a municipality to allow cannabis retail stores is final and may not be subsequently reversed. OPTING IN TO ALLOW RETAIL CANNABIS STORES If at any time before January 22, 2019, a municipality decides it will allow cannabis retail stores within its jurisdiction they are encouraged to notify the AGCO as soon as possible. Early notification to the AGCO, using the [email protected] email, will not change the earliest date that licensed retail stores may open, which remains April 1, 2019. If the AGCO does not receive written notification from a municipality by January 22, 2019 they will be considered to be allowing cannabis retail stores by default. INFORMATION FOR ONTARIO MUNICIPALITIES ABOUT CANNABIS RETAIL STORE LICENSING The maximum 25 Retail Store Authorizations will be allocated in accordance with Ontario Regulation 468/18, which provides for the maximum number of stores in the following Regions: a.
    [Show full text]
  • Passport to Fun in Ontario 2021/22 EDITION
    FREE TAKE ME MONEY $AVING COUPONS INSIDE! WITH YOU! Passport to fun in Ontario 2021/22 EDITION Who’s Ready for a Road Trip? Travel Safe this Summer Oh, the Places We’ll Go in York Durham Headwaters Discover Hamilton Halton Brant attractionsontario.ca www.attractionsontario.ca 1 SELECT NIGHTS NOVEMBER– DECEMBER ‘TIS THE SEASON FOR FUN! Millions Of Lights | Live Shows | Ice Skating | Family Activites | Select Rides & Much More Visit canadaswonderland.com/winterfest for full details. © 2021 Cedar Fair, L.P. CW21-045 Index Wake Up the Food Lover in You! 7 Be the Explorer! 7 The Great Taste of Ontario 9 Who’s Ready for a Road Trip? 11 SELECT NIGHTS Oh, the Places We’ll Go 16 NOVEMBER– Discover Hamilton Halton Brant 20 DECEMBER 13c Find Your Adventure in South Eastern Ontario 26 Tourism Windsor Essex Pelee Island 29 Travel Safe This Summer 30 Wide Open Spaces, Amazing Places 35 13c Coupons 39 Listings 42 13c 12 10 11 3 Hamilton Halton Brant hamiltonhaltonbrant.com 8 9 5 Destination Toronto destinationtoronto.com 7 6 6 York Durham Headwaters yorkdurhamheadwaters.ca/ 5 8 Kawartha’s Northumberland kawarthasnorthumberland.ca 4 9 South Eastern Ontario southeasternontario.ca 3 2 10 Ottawa Tourism ottawatourism.ca 1 11 Ontario’s Highlands comewander.ca 13 Destination Northern Ontario destinationnorthernontario.ca Passport Magazine is the premier publication of Attractions Ontario for Ontario Attractions consumers. Attractions Ontario is the authority on Attractions & Tourism in Ontario, the voice of the industry and the source for consumers to discover Ontario’s rich offering of Attraction & Tourism experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Districts, Voters on List and Votes Polled, Names and Addresses of Members of the House of Commons, As Elected at the Nineteenth General Election, Mar
    PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTATION 69 9.—Electoral Districts, Voters on List and Votes Polled, Names and Addresses of Members of the House of Commons, as Elected at the Nineteenth General Election, Mar. 26, 1940—continued. Province and Popula­ Voters Votes Party Electoral District tion, on Polled Name of Member Affili­ P.O. Address 1931 List ation No. No. No. Quebec—concluded Montreal Island—cone St. Henry 78,127 46,236 31,282 BONNIEK, J. A. Lib. Montreal, Que. St. James 89,374 64,823 35,587 DuROCHER, E. .. Lib. Montreal, Que. St. Lawrence- St. George 40,213 29,416 18,544 CLAXTON, B Lib. Montreal, Que. St. Mary 77,472 49,874 30,289 DESLAURIERS, H1 Lib. Montreal, Que. Verdun 63,144 40,555 28,033 COTE, P. E Lib. Verdun, Que. Ontario— (82 members) Algoma East... 27,925 15,250 10,386 FARQUHAR, T. Lib. Mindemoya, Ont. Algoma West... 35,618 22,454 16,580 NIXON, G. E.. Lib. Sault Ste. Marie, Ont. Brant 21,202 12,980 9,229 WOOD, G. E Lib... Cainsville, Ont. Brantford City.. 32,274 21,607 15,762 MACDONALD, W. R Lib... Brantford, Ont. Bruce 29,842 19,359 12,781 TOMLINSON, W. R Lib... Port Elgin, Ont. Carleton 31,305 20,716 14,481 HYNDMAN, A. B.2 Cons. Carp, Ont. Cochrane 58,284 44,559 26,729 BRADETTE, J. A Lib... Cochrane, Ont. Dufferin-Simcoe. 27,394 19,338 10,840 ROWE, Hon. W. E.... Cons. Newton Robinson, Ont. Durham 25,782 17,095 12,254 RlCKARD, W. F Lib Newcastle, Ont. Elgin 43,436 30,216 20,902 MILLS, W.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2020 Annual Report 1 This Page Has Been Intentionally Left Blank
    ONTA RIO ONTARIO’S WATCHDOG ANNUAL REPORT 2019-2020 Office of the Ombudsman of Ontario 483 Bay Street 10th Floor, South Tower Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C9 Telephone: 416-586-3300 Complaints line: 1-800-263-1830 Fax: 416-586-3485 TTY: 1-866-411-4211 Website: www.ombudsman.on.ca @Ont_Ombudsman Ontario Ombudsman OntarioOmbudsman OntOmbuds ISSN 1708-0851 ONTA RIO ONTARIO’S WATCHDOG June 2020 Hon. Ted Arnott, Speaker Legislative Assembly Province of Ontario Queen’s Park Dear Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to submit my Annual Report for the period of April 1, 2019 to March 31, 2020, pursuant to section 11 of the Ombudsman Act, so that you may table it before the Legislative Assembly. Sincerely, Paul Dubé Ombudsman Office of the Ombudsman of Ontario 483 Bay Street 10th Floor, South Tower Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C9 Telephone: 416-583-3300 Complaints line: 1-800-263-1830 Website: www.ombudsman.on.ca Office of the Ombudsman of Ontario • 2019-2020 Annual Report 1 This page has been intentionally left blank 2 Office of the Ombudsman of Ontario • 2019-2020 Annual Report YEAR IN REVIEW • TEXT TABLE OF CONTENTS OMBUDSMAN’S MESSAGE .........................................................................................................5 2019-2020 AT A GLANCE ............................................................................................................8 ABOUT OUR OFFICE .................................................................................................................10 HOW WE WORK .........................................................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario Providing Municipalities with Funding
    September 08, 2020 Page 1 of 13 C 14 - CW Info NEWS Office of the Premier Ontario Providing Municipalities with up to $1.6 Billion in First Round of Emergency Funding Assistance Will Help Ensure the Delivery of Critical Public Services During COVID-19 August 12, 2020 1:00 P.M. TORONTO — The Ontario government, in partnership with the federal government, is delivering on its commitment to provide up to $4 billion in urgently needed one-time assistance to Ontario's 444 municipalities. Municipalities will be provided with up to $1.6 billion as part of the first round of emergency funding under the Safe Restart Agreement. This funding will help municipalities protect the health and well-being of the people of Ontario, while continuing to deliver critical public services, such as public transit and shelters, as the province continues down the path of renewal, growth and economic recovery. Through the Safe Restart Agreement with the federal government, $695 million will help municipalities address operating pressures related to the COVID-19 pandemic through the first round of emergency funding, and over $660 million will support transit systems. The province is also providing an additional $212 million through the Social Services Relief Fund to help vulnerable people find shelter. The details were provided today by Premier Doug Ford, Rod Phillips, Minister of Finance, Kinga Surma, Associate Minister of Transportation (GTA), and Jim McDonell, Parliamentary Assistant to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing. "Since the beginning of the pandemic, we have had the backs of our municipalities, which is why we are announcing up to $1.6 billion in critical funding today to help strengthen our communities and safely restart our economy," said Premier Ford.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Minutes – Review of Minutes for Correctness
    The District Municipality of Muskoka District Council Meeting 1(2021) – Electronic Meeting Agenda 3:00 p.m., Monday, January 18, 2021 As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and requirements for physical distancing, this meeting will be held electronically in accordance with section 238 of the Municipal Act. As part of the District's response to stop the spread of COVID-19, the Municipal Office remains closed to the public until further notice. Members of the public are encouraged to view the Council proceedings through webcast. District webcasts can be accessed at the following link: https://www.muskoka.on.ca/en/district-government/webcasts.aspx Call to Order Acknowledgement of Supplementary Agenda Declaration of Pecuniary Interests Ceremonial and Invited Presentations Oral Presentations (Deputations/Delegations) Previous Council Meetings – Review of Minutes for Correctness a) District Council – 19(2020) – December 21, 2020 Committee Reports a) Finance and Corporate Services – FCS-11-2020 – December 22, 2020 i) Review of Minutes for Correctness ii) Committee Report b) Community and Planning Services – CPS-14-2020 – December 21, 2020 i) Review of Minutes for Correctness ii) Committee Report c) Community and Planning Services – CPS-15-2020 – December 21, 2020 i) Review of Minutes for Correctness ii) Committee Report This meeting will be Webcast and Video Recorded Correspondence/Written Submissions All correspondence listed is a matter of public record. Should any member of Council or the public wish to receive full copies, please contact the Clerk’s department. Motions Councillors S. Clement and P. Kelly requested that the following motion be considered by Council: Moved by S.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Industrial Wind Turbines on Residential Property Assessment in Ontario 2016 Assessment Base Year Study
    . .,;;r U f..fl t:ffFf A C .. PR □ PERiY ASSESSMEN"t Exhibit A15-3 OORPDRATl □ N IMPACT OF INDUSTRIAL WIND TURBINES ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENT IN ONTARIO 2016 ASSESSMENT BASE YEAR STUDY Page 1 of 39 Exhibit A15-3 Table of Contents ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................. 3 AUTHORS OF THIS REPORT .................................................................................................... 4 JASON MOORE, MRICS, MBA, UBC CERTIFICATE OF REAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENT .................................... 4 JAMIE STATA, BA, UBC CERTIFICATE OF REAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENT ....................................................... 4 SCOTT BRADFIELD, BSC (HON), A.I.M.A .............................................................................................. 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................6 BACKGROUND ••.•••••...............•••...•••••••••••........••••••...•••.•••.•••..•••....................•••.............•••••••....••••...... 6 2008 BASE YEAR STUDY .................................................................................................................... 6 2012 BASE YEAR STUDY .................................................................................................................... 7 2016 BASE YEAR STUDY .................................................................................................................... 7 CONCLUSIONS
    [Show full text]