Plant Water Use Efficiency of 17 Australian NAD–ME and NADP–ME C Grasses at Ambient and Elevated CO Partial Pressure

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Plant Water Use Efficiency of 17 Australian NAD–ME and NADP–ME C Grasses at Ambient and Elevated CO Partial Pressure Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 2001, 28, 1207–1217 Plant water use efficiency of 17 Australian NAD–ME and NADP–ME C4 grasses at ambient and elevated CO2 partial pressure Oula GhannoumAC, Susanne von CaemmererB and Jann P. ConroyA ACentre for Horticulture and Plant Sciences, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, South Penrith DC, NSW 1797, Australia. BMolecular Plant Physiology Group, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, PO Box 475, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. CCurrent address: Molecular Plant Physiology Group, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, PO Box 475, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. Corresponding author; email: [email protected] Abstract. This study investigates the response to elevated CO2 partial pressure (pCO2) of C4 grasses belonging to different biochemical subtypes (NAD–ME and NADP–ME), and taxonomic groups (main Chloroid assemblage, Paniceae and Andropogoneae). Seventeen C4 grasses were grown under well-watered conditions in two glasshouses maintained at an average daily pCO2 of 42 (ambient) or 68 (elevated) Pa. Elevated pCO2 significantly increased plant water-use efficiency (WUE; dry matter gain per unit water transpired) in 12 out of the 17 C4 grasses, by an average of 33%. In contrast, only five species showed a significant growth stimulation. When all species are considered, the average plant dry mass enhancement at elevated pCO2 was 26%. There were no significant subtype × (or taxa) pCO2 interactions on either WUE or biomass accumulation. When leaf gas exchange was compared at growth pCO2 but similar light and temperature, high pCO2-grown plants had similar CO2 assimilation rates (A) but a 40% lower stomatal conductance than their low pCO2-grown counterparts. There were no signs of either photosynthetic or stomatal acclimation in any of the measured species. We conclude that elevated pCO2 improved WUE primarily by reducing stomatal conductance. Keywords: C4 photosynthesis, CO2 enrichment, NAD–ME, NADP–ME, water-use efficiency. Introduction 1998) account for a great deal of this variability. However, this does not explain the large variability in the growth It is becoming increasingly evident that both well-watered response of well-watered and -fertilised C plants. To date, and water-stressed C plants can accumulate more biomass at 4 4 three possible sources of variations have been investigated. elevated CO partial pressure (pCO : Poorter 1993; Poorter 2 2 First, C weeds were found to show a larger growth et al. 1996; Wand et al. 1999). However, not all well-watered 4 response to CO enrichment than C crops (Ziska and Bunce C plants show a growth response, and it is not clear whether 2 4 4 1997). This may reflect the greater physiological plasticity of all well-watered C4 plants use less soil water at high pCO2. weeds (relative to highly-bred crops) to most environmental There are numerous examples of responsive (e.g. Wong factors. Secondly, based on the major C acid decarboxyla- 1979; Sionit and Patterson 1984; Read and Morgan 1996; 4 tion enzyme operating in the bundle sheath, C4 plants are Ghannoum et al. 1997; Watling and Press 1997; Ziska and grouped into three biochemical subtypes [NAD–malic Bunce 1997; LeCain and Morgan 1998; Wand et al. 2001) enzyme (NAD–ME; EC 1.1.1.39), NADP–malic enzyme and non-responsive (e.g. Patterson and Flint 1980; Carter and (NADP–ME; EC 1.1.1.40) and phosphoenolpyruvate Peterson 1983; Morison and Gifford 1984b; Wilsey et al. carboxykinase (PCK; EC 4.1.1.49)], possessing character- 1994; Ward et al. 1999; Wand et al. 2001) C4 plants to istic leaf biochemistry, anatomy and physiology (Hatch elevated pCO2. The interaction with environmental factors, 1987; Hattersley 1992; Ghannoum et al. 2001). It has been particularly water (e.g. Owensby et al. 1993; Samarakoon hypothesised that NAD–ME grasses have bundle sheath and Gifford 1996; Seneweera et al. 1998) and nitrogen walls which are ‘leakier’ to CO2 diffusion (Hattersley 1982), supply (e.g. Owensby et al. 1994; Ghannoum and Conroy and hence ought to be more responsive to elevated pCO2 Abbreviations used: A, CO2 assimilation rate; g, stomatal conductance; LAR, leaf area ratio; ME, malic enzyme; pCO2, CO2 partial pressure; pi, intercellular pCO2; ppm, parts per million; SLA, specific leaf area ratio; VPDl, vapour pressure deficit at leaf surface; WUE, water-use efficiency. © CSIRO 2001 10.1071/PP01056 0310-7841/01/121207 1208 O. Ghannoum et al. than their NADP–ME counterparts (LeCain and Morgan nomic groups (main Chloroid assemblage, Paniceae and 1998; Ziska et al. 1999; Wand et al. 2001). However, using a Andropogoneae). We focussed on NAD–ME and small number of C4 grasses, it was shown that the growth NADP–ME subtypes because they are the floristically most response tends to be larger in NADP–ME than NAD–ME dominant in Australia and biochemically and anatomically, grasses (LeCain and Morgan 1998; Wand et al. 2001), and the most contrasting subtypes (Hattersley 1992). This also independent of leak rate (Ziska et al. 1999). Thirdly, the allowed us to use more species in each group. taxonomic origin of C4 grasses has also been proposed as a source of variation for the growth response to elevated pCO2 Materials and methods (Kellogg et al. 1999). With a few exceptions, the NAD–ME Plant culture and growth conditions and NADP–ME pathways originated in distinct taxa (Hattersley 1992; Kellogg 1999; Sage et al. 1999). Using a Soil was collected from bushland at Robertson, NSW, left to dry in air, then mixed with the following nutrients (g kg–1 soil): N (0.6); P (0.27); few representative species of three lineages, Kellogg et al. Ca (2.5); Mg (0.36); K (1.67); Zn (0.04) and Cu (0.005) added as (1999) found that inter-specific variations in the growth (NH4)2SO4; CaHPO4; CaCO3, CaSO4; MgCO3; K2CO3; ZnSO4; and response of C4 grasses to CO2 enrichment outweigh those CuSO4. To prevent water leakage, plastic bags were placed inside between subfamilies. Nevertheless, significant inter- 3.5 or 10 L cylindrical pots. The amended soil (3.2 or 6.7 kg) was taxonomic differences in the growth response were also added to the pots, which were watered to 100% capacity, then observed (Kellogg et al. 1999). It is likely that variations in transferred to one of two naturally-lit, temperature-controlled glasshouses, maintained at an average daily pCO of either 42 the growth response are dependent on all of the afore 2 (ambient) or 68 (elevated) Pa (Fig. 1a). pCO2 was controlled by mentioned factors, but the small number of screened species injecting CO2 (Fogg grade; BOC Gases, North Ryde, Australia) from makes it difficult to distinguish general trends from pressurized cylinders through solenoid valves connected to an inter-specific variations. Differences in the growth response infra-red gas analyser (IRGA) (Fuji Electrics, Hokkaido, Japan). CO2 may also be related to other physiological or morphological was first passed through a Purafil column (Purafil Inc., Doraville, GA, USA) to eliminate possible ethylene contamination. pCO2 was traits, which may be causally or coincidentally associated monitored in both glasshouses by logging the voltage output, every with the biochemical subtype or evolutionary origin. 15 min, from the IRGAs with an ADAM-4018M analog data logger Another point of interest is the impact of elevated pCO2 (Priority Electronics, Sydney, Australia) interfaced with a PC. The on soil water availability and whole-plant water-use IRGAs were calibrated weekly with pure N2, and two CO2 calibration efficiency (WUE; dry matter gain per unit water transpired) (352 ± 7 and 735 ± 15 ppm) gases (BOC Gases). Air temperature and relative humidity were recorded every 15 min using Tinytag loggers of C4 plants. This is important for the prediction not only of (HDL, Port Macquarie, Australia), and averaged 30/23°C and 45/56% the growth response of C4 plants to a changing climate, but day/night, respectively (Figs 1b, c). Midday photosynthetically-active also their competitiveness and ultimately, geographic distri- radiation was measured daily with a LI–189 light meter (LI-COR Inc., –2 –1 bution (Polley et al. 1997; Howden 1999a; b). Due to the Lincoln, NE, USA), and averaged 860 µmol m s . Seventeen C4 grass species, belonging to different biochemical subtypes (NAD–ME near CO2-saturation of C4 photosynthesis in normal air, the effect of CO enrichment on C plants is thought to be and NADP–ME) and taxonomic groups (main Chloroid assemblage, 2 4 Paniceae and Andropogoneae) were used (Table 1). A more detailed mediated mainly through stomatal closure, and the subse- description of the species is given in Ghannoum et al. (2001). About quent reductions in leaf transpiration rate (Ghannoum et al. 10 seeds of each species were sown in each pot. Pot size and number of 2000). Therefore, it is assumed that C4 plants will spare soil plants per pot (2–4) were chosen in such a way as to maintain a water and become more water-use efficient at elevated relatively similar proportion between water (and hence other soil pCO . This assumption is mainly based on extrapolations resources) use and plant size. This was based on the rate of water use as 2 noted in a previous drought experiment (O. Ghannoum, unpublished from leaf-based instantaneous measures of WUE. Few data). There were four pots per species and pCO2 treatment. Two studies made direct measurements of whole-plant water use control pots, without plants but weighed with the same amount of and WUE in C4 plants at elevated pCO2. In general, these fertilised soil as planted pots, were included in each pCO2 treatment. Pots were randomised between the glasshouses every week to minimise studies indicated that CO2 enrichment leads to significant increases in WUE and soil water availability (Morison and possible glasshouse effects.
Recommended publications
  • Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report
    Geography Monograph Series No. 13 Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. Brisbane, 2009 The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. is a non-profit organization that promotes the study of Geography within educational, scientific, professional, commercial and broader general communities. Since its establishment in 1885, the Society has taken the lead in geo- graphical education, exploration and research in Queensland. Published by: The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. 237 Milton Road, Milton QLD 4064, Australia Phone: (07) 3368 2066; Fax: (07) 33671011 Email: [email protected] Website: www.rgsq.org.au ISBN 978 0 949286 16 8 ISSN 1037 7158 © 2009 Desktop Publishing: Kevin Long, Page People Pty Ltd (www.pagepeople.com.au) Printing: Snap Printing Milton (www.milton.snapprinting.com.au) Cover: Pemberton Design (www.pembertondesign.com.au) Cover photo: Cravens Peak. Photographer: Nick Rains 2007 State map and Topographic Map provided by: Richard MacNeill, Spatial Information Coordinator, Bush Heritage Australia (www.bushheritage.org.au) Other Titles in the Geography Monograph Series: No 1. Technology Education and Geography in Australia Higher Education No 2. Geography in Society: a Case for Geography in Australian Society No 3. Cape York Peninsula Scientific Study Report No 4. Musselbrook Reserve Scientific Study Report No 5. A Continent for a Nation; and, Dividing Societies No 6. Herald Cays Scientific Study Report No 7. Braving the Bull of Heaven; and, Societal Benefits from Seasonal Climate Forecasting No 8. Antarctica: a Conducted Tour from Ancient to Modern; and, Undara: the Longest Known Young Lava Flow No 9. White Mountains Scientific Study Report No 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Gulf, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • South West Queensland QLD Page 1 of 89 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region South West Queensland, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Classification of the Chloridoideae (Poaceae)
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 55 (2010) 580–598 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A classification of the Chloridoideae (Poaceae) based on multi-gene phylogenetic trees Paul M. Peterson a,*, Konstantin Romaschenko a,b, Gabriel Johnson c a Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013, USA b Botanic Institute of Barcelona (CSICÀICUB), Pg. del Migdia, s.n., 08038 Barcelona, Spain c Department of Botany and Laboratories of Analytical Biology, Smithsonian Institution, Suitland, MD 20746, USA article info abstract Article history: We conducted a molecular phylogenetic study of the subfamily Chloridoideae using six plastid DNA Received 29 July 2009 sequences (ndhA intron, ndhF, rps16-trnK, rps16 intron, rps3, and rpl32-trnL) and a single nuclear ITS Revised 31 December 2009 DNA sequence. Our large original data set includes 246 species (17.3%) representing 95 genera (66%) Accepted 19 January 2010 of the grasses currently placed in the Chloridoideae. The maximum likelihood and Bayesian analysis of Available online 22 January 2010 DNA sequences provides strong support for the monophyly of the Chloridoideae; followed by, in order of divergence: a Triraphideae clade with Neyraudia sister to Triraphis; an Eragrostideae clade with the Keywords: Cotteinae (includes Cottea and Enneapogon) sister to the Uniolinae (includes Entoplocamia, Tetrachne, Biogeography and Uniola), and a terminal Eragrostidinae clade of Ectrosia, Harpachne, and Psammagrostis embedded Classification Chloridoideae in a polyphyletic Eragrostis; a Zoysieae clade with Urochondra sister to a Zoysiinae (Zoysia) clade, and a Grasses terminal Sporobolinae clade that includes Spartina, Calamovilfa, Pogoneura, and Crypsis embedded in a Molecular systematics polyphyletic Sporobolus; and a very large terminal Cynodonteae clade that includes 13 monophyletic sub- Phylogenetic trees tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Rangelands, Western Australia
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Responses of C4 Invasive Grass Eragrostis Curvula and C3 Native Australian Grass Austrodanthonia Racemosa Under Elevated CO2 and Water Limitation
    The responses of C4 invasive grass Eragrostis curvula and C3 native Australian grass Austrodanthonia racemosa under elevated CO2 and water limitation. Sara Elizabeth Lorraine Hely A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. School of Biological Science University of New South Wales 2008 i Abstract The concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere has increased by 35% since pre-industrial levels. Projections for the next 100 years indicate an increase to levels between 490 and 1260 parts per million by volume (ppm) of CO2, equating to a 75 % to 350 % increase in concentration since the year 1750. Associated with this increase in [CO2] will be a 1.4 to 5.8º C increase in lower atmospheric temperature. While past research has attempted to address the effects of such climatic changes on individual plant responses, predictions of plant responses at the ecosystem level are still highly uncertain. Difficulties lie in the enormous variation of plant responses to climate change variables among and within species, and between and within environmental conditions. Past research assumed that plants using either the C3 or C4 metabolic pathways would respond differently but predictably to climate-change variables based on their metabolic pathway. Recent evidence has suggested however, that the added interactions of external environmental variables and species-specific sensitivities to climate change make it difficult to predict plant and ecosystem responses to climate change. To investigate the mechanisms behind responses of Australian grasses to climate change, 2 pot experiments was conducted using growth cabinets to compare the effect of elevated CO2 and water-limitation on the invasive C4 grassland plant, Eragrostis curvula (E.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Vegetation Attribute Manual Version 6.0
    Australian Vegetation Attribute Manual Version 6.0 August 2003 Executive Steering Committee for Australian Vegetation Information © Commonwealth of Australia 2003 Published by the Department of Environment and Heritage, Canberra. ISBN 0 642 54953 2 Published August 2003 This work is copyright. Information presented in this document may be reproduced in whole or in part for study or training purposes, subject to the inclusion of acknowledgment of the source and provided no commercial usage or sale of the material occurs. Reproduction for purposes other than those given requires written permission from the Department of the Environment and Heritage. Requests for permission should be addressed to Assistant Secretary, Knowledge Management and Education Branch, Environment Australia, GPO Box 787, Canberra, ACT, 2601. Suggested Citation: Executive Steering Committee for Australian Vegetation Information (ESCAVI) (2003) Australian Vegetation Attribute Manual: National Vegetation Information System, Version 6.0. Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra. ii Acknowledgements ESCAVI would like to thank the following people for their input and assistance in compiling this version of the manual: • Sarah Sharpe, Mark Dunford and Greg Keen, Environment ACT, Department of Urban Affairs and Planning, Australian Capital Territory. • Peter Brocklehurst, Department of Lands, Planning and Environment, Northern Territory • Ross Peacock, Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources, New South Wales. • Bruce Wilson and John Neldner, Botanical Sciences (Queensland Herbarium), Environmental Protection Agency, Queensland. • Felicity Smith, Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia. • Sophie Underwood and Anne Kitchener, Department of Primary Industry, Water and Environment, Tasmania. • David Parkes, Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria. • Damien Shepherd, Department of Agriculture, Western Australia • Matt Bolton, Gaston Rozenbilds and Leo Berzins, Department of the Environment and Heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Vegetation Attribute Manual Version 7.0 Chapter 2.0 NVIS Concepts and Standard Procedures
    Australian Vegetation Attribute Manual Version 7.0 Chapter 2.0 NVIS concepts and standard procedures Australian Vegetation Attribute Manual Version 7.0 2.1 Vegetation The NVIS framework provides a comprehensive means of describing and representing vegetation types, based on establishing relationships between structural and floristic data in a relational database management system. It is assumed that field surveys have already been conducted and that observational data has been classified into meaningful vegetation types, which are typically the mapping units used in the region (for example, see Thackway et al ., 2008). This section primarily deals with the non- spatial vegetation data used to describe each vegetation type, but also includes a short section introducing vegetation-specific metadata used to describe the methods used to survey, classify and map the vegetation of a region. As discussed in the Section 1.5 (Scope of the Australian Vegetation Attribute Manual), this manual is not intended to be a guide for the collection of vegetation data in the field. Mapping standards generally follow accepted thematic polygon or multi- attribute raster data in the natural resources management sector. However, NVIS accepts the best available vegetation descriptions and spatial data from a number of state, territory and non-government systems. Where necessary, and particularly in relation to data gaps, NVIS will accept the multi-attribute spatial layers resulting from aerial photo interpretation for incorporation into derived products. However, these data result from an earlier task of the vegetation mapping workflow; incorporating classified data is the predominant and most-efficient approach. The approach to describing vegetation types in NVIS is derived from field survey methods, such as those described above, in that a vegetation profile is first interpreted into a simple model with several layers or strata (upper (U), mid (M) and ground (G)) which have particular structural and floristic properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Ecological Communities for Western
    PRIORITY ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES FOR WESTERN AUSTRALIA VERSION 27 Species and Communities Branch, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions 30 June 2017 Possible threatened ecological communities that do not meet survey criteria or that are not adequately defined are added to the priority ecological community list under priorities 1, 2 and 3. These three categories are ranked in order of priority for survey and/or definition of the community, and evaluation of conservation status, so that consideration can be given to their declaration as threatened ecological communities. Ecological communities that are adequately known, and are rare but not threatened or meet criteria for near threatened, or that have been recently removed from the threatened list, are placed in priority 4. These ecological communities require regular monitoring. Conservation dependent ecological communities are placed in priority 5. Note: i) Nothing in this table may be construed as a nomination for listing under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) ii) The inclusion in this table of a community type does not necessarily imply any status as a threatened ecological community, however some communities are listed as threatened ecological communities (TECs) under the EPBC Act (see column D). iii) The key diagnostic characteristics, condition and size thresholds in the Approved Conservation Advices should be applied to determine if particular areas align with EPBC listed TECs. iii) Regions eg Pilbara are based on Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions regional boundaries. iv) For definitions of categories (Priority 1 etc.) refer to document entitled ‘Definitions and Categories’. Community name Category Category (WA) EPBC Act PILBARA West Angelas Cracking-Clays Priority 1 Open tussock grasslands of Astrebla pectinata, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Study for the Narran Lakes and Lower Balonne Floodplain Management Study (R2011)
    Scoping study for the Narran Lakes and Lower Balonne floodplain management study (R2011) Martin Thoms Gerry Quinn Rhonda Butcher Bill Phillips Glenn Wilson Margaret Brock Ben Gawne Technical Report 3/2002 August 2002 Scoping study for the Narran Lakes and Lower Balonne floodplain management study (R2011) Martin Thoms CRC for Freshwater Ecology Gerry Quinn CRC for Freshwater Ecology Rhonda Butcher CRC for Freshwater Ecology Bill Phillips Mainstream Environmental Consulting Glenn Wilson CRC for Freshwater Ecology Margaret Brock CRC for Freshwater Ecology Ben Gawne CRC for Freshwater Ecology Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, University of Canberra, ACT 2601 Technical Report 3/2002 AUGUST 2002 The Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology is a national research centre specialising in river and wetland ecology. The CRC for Freshwater Ecology provides ecological knowledge to help manage rivers in a sustainable way. The CRC was established in 1993 under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centre Program and is a joint venture between: ACTEW Corporation CSIRO Land and Water Department of Land and Water Conservation, NSW Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Victoria Environment ACT Environment Protection Authority, NSW Environment Protection Authority, Victoria Goulburn-Murray Rural Water Authority Griffith University La Trobe University Lower Murray Water Melbourne Water Monash University Murray-Darling Basin Commission Natural Resources and Mines, Queensland Sunraysia Rural Water Authority Sydney Catchment Authority University of Adelaide University of Canberra Ph: 02 6201 5168 Fax: 02 6201 5038 Email: [email protected] http://freshwater.canberra.edu.au ISBN 1 87681024 6 This report (Scoping Study for the Narran Lakes and Lower Balonne Floodplain Management Study) was produced for the Murray-Darling Basin Commission as part of the Strategic Investigation Program — Rivers — Project R2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Darling Riverine Plains Bioregion Background Report 1 INTRODUCTION
    DDAARRLLIINNGG RRIIVVEERRIINNEE PPLLAAIINNSS BBIIOORREEGGIIOONN BBaacckkggrroouunndd RReeppoorrtt NSW BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY [JULY 2002] DARLING RIVERINE PLAINS BACKGROUND REPORT DARLING RIVERINE PLAINS BIOREGION A project undertaken for the NSW Biodiversity Strategy For more information data contact the: Western Regional Assessments Unit, NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service PO Box 2111 DUBBO NSW 2830 Ph: (02) 6841 9200 Fax: (02) 6841 9222 www.npws.nsw.gov.au © Crown copyright [July 2002] New South Wales Government ISBN 0731365305 This project has been funded by the NSW Biodiversity Strategy and coordinated by Western Regional Assessments Unit, NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service This report was produced by Anne Kearle, Carl Gosper, Helen Achurch and Tania Laity. Maps in the atlas were produced by Fiona Ross. Thanks to Gary Saunders for managing the project and providing valuable input. For their comments: Bill Johnson, NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service; Mike Maher, NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service; Murray Ellis, NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service; Mike Fleming, NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service; Steve Lewer, NSW Department of Land and Water Conservation; Darren Shelley, NSW Department of Land and Water Conservation; Terry Mazzer, NSW Department of Land and Water Conservation; and Patrick Tap, State Forests of New South Wales. Disclaimer While every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that this document is correct at the time of printing, the State of New South Wales, its agents and employees, do not assume any responsibility and shall have no liability, consequential or otherwise, of any kind, arising from the use of or reliance on any of the information contained in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Astrebla Spp. Scientific Name  Astrebla Elymoides F
    Tropical Forages Astrebla spp. Scientific name Astrebla elymoides F. Muell. ex F.M. Bailey Astrebla lappacea (Lindl.) Domin Astrebla pectinata (Lindl.) F. Muell. Bull Mitchell grassland, Longreach, Australia Astrebla squarrosa C.E. Hubb. Bull Mitchell grass (A. squarrosa) Subordinate taxon: Astrebla pectinata (Lindl.) F. Muell. var. curvifolia F.M. Bailey Synonyms A. lappacea: Basionym: Danthonia lappacea Lindl.; Astrebla triticoides (Lindl.) F. Muell.; Danthonia triticoides Lindl. Mature plants A. pectinata: Basionym: Danthonia pectinata Lindl. Inflorescence Bull Mitchell grass (A. Family/tribe squarrosa) Family: Poaceae (alt. Gramineae) subfamily: Chloridoideae tribe: Cynodonteae. Morphological description Strongly tufted perennial grasses growing to 1 m tall, culms erect or ascending, arising from scaly bases. Rhizomes short or absent. Ligule a ciliolate membrane or fringe of hairs; leaf blades rolled in bud, narrow. Inflorescence a terminal spike or spike-like raceme, Curly Mitchell grass (A. lappacea) solitary or paired. Roots wiry, dual system comprising shallow roots to utilise surface moisture from lighter Inflorescence Bull Mitchell grass rainfall and a deep (>200 cm) system to access subsoil moisture. Species A. elymoides (hoop Mitchell): tussock to 50 cm. Stems thin, palatable. Leaf blades linear, attenuate, 12‒35 cm × 0.3‒0.5 cm, glabrous, glaucous, surface ribbed, margins scaberulous, not curling as plant hays off. Spike-like racemes solitary, 12‒35 cm long, narrow, straight, or arcuate, hooping (weeping) towards the ground when Inflorescence Barley Mitchell grass (A. pectinata) mature. Spikelet >4 mm wide, appressed to rachis. A. lappacea (curly Mitchell): tussock to 50 cm, erect, or Inflorescence Curly Mitchell grass (A. lappacea) decumbent. Stems thin, palatable. Leaf blades linear- oblong, acute, 10‒20 cm × 0.4‒0.5 cm, mostly glabrous, glaucous, curling distinctly as plant hays off.
    [Show full text]