DOCSLIB.ORG

The Run on the Rock

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Run on the Rock House of Commons Treasury Committee The run on the Rock Fifth Report of Session 2007–08 Volume I EMBARGOED ADVANCE COPY It is not to be published in full, or in part in any form before 00.01 am on Saturday 26 January 2008 HC 56–I House of Commons Treasury Committee The run on the Rock Fifth Report of Session 2007–08 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 24 January 2008 HC 56–I [Incorporating HC 999 i–iv, Session 2006-07] Published on Saturday 26 January 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The run on the Rock 4 The Treasury Committee The Treasury Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of HM Treasury, HM Revenue & Customs and associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon John McFall MP (Labour, West Dunbartonshire) (Chairman) Nick Ainger MP (Labour, Carmarthen West & South Pembrokeshire) Mr Graham Brady MP (Conservative, Altrincham and Sale West) Mr Colin Breed MP (Liberal Democrat, South East Cornwall) Jim Cousins MP (Labour, Newcastle upon Tyne Central) Mr Philip Dunne MP (Conservative, Ludlow) Mr Michael Fallon MP (Conservative, Sevenoaks) (Chairman, Sub-Committee) Ms Sally Keeble MP (Labour, Northampton North) Mr Andrew Love MP (Labour, Edmonton) Mr George Mudie MP (Labour, Leeds East) Mr Siôn Simon MP, (Labour, Birmingham, Erdington) John Thurso MP (Liberal Democrat, Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) Mr Mark Todd MP (Labour, South Derbyshire) Peter Viggers MP (Conservative, Gosport). Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/treascom. A list of Reports of the Committee in the current Parliament is at the back of this volume. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Colin Lee (Clerk), Sîan Jones (Second Clerk and Clerk of the Sub-Committee), Adam Wales, Jon Young and Jay Sheth (Committee Specialists), Lis McCracken (Committee Assistant), Caroline McElwee (Secretary), Tes Stranger (Senior Office Clerk) and Laura Humble (Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerks of the Treasury Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 5769; the Committee’s email address is [email protected]. The run on the Rock 1 Contents Report Page Summary 3 1 Introduction 5 The run on the Rock 5 The conduct of our inquiry 5 The role of our inquiry 6 Our two Reports 7 2 Northern Rock’s business model 10 The importance of Northern Rock in the North East 10 Assets 11 Liabilities 12 The events of 2007 14 Responsibility for the problems at Northern Rock 17 3 The regulation of Northern Rock 21 Northern Rock’s regulation as a high impact firm 21 Potential warnings 22 The Basel II waiver 24 The regulation of liquidity 26 Stress testing 29 Qualifications of senior directors 33 Conclusions 34 4 The events of August and September 35 Introduction 35 The Bank of England’s money market operations until 20 September 37 The decisions on the “safe haven” 50 The support operation, the run and the guarantee 54 5 Dealing with failing banks 73 Why is it important that banks can fail? 73 Why banks are special 73 The potential role of public authorities 74 Who bears the risk of bank failure? 75 Prompt corrective action 77 A special resolution regime? 81 Critical banking functions 85 Lender of last resort 86 6 Depositor protection 87 Introduction 87 Rationale for deposit protection 88 Co-insurance 89 Compensation limit 91 Speedy release of funds 93 Communication 95 Identifying insured depositors 96 Off-setting of loans and mortgages against deposits 97 Funding 98 The run on the Rock 2 7 Lessons learned 104 Our inquiry and other reviews 104 The roles of the Tripartite authorities and the overall functioning of the Tripartite arrangements 104 War games and lessons learnt 108 Leadership 109 Communications strategy with the public 110 Damage to the Tripartite authorities and UK economy 112 Tripartite influence on companies receiving support 113 The audit of high-risk financial institutions 113 8 Reforms 116 Introduction 116 The Deposit Protection Fund 116 Regulatory powers 116 Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? 117 The limits of political control 118 Allocation of the new powers and their relationship to existing responsibilities of the Bank of England 118 Responsibilities of the Office of the Deputy Governor and Head of Financial Stability 121 Operation of the Tripartite arrangements under the new structure 122 Responsibilities of the Treasury 123 9 Northern Rock since September 124 Overview 124 The Bank of England liquidity facility announced on 14 September 124 The deposit guarantees of September and October 125 The additional facilities announced on 9 October 127 The discussions on State aid rules up to early December 129 The further extension of the Government guarantee in December 131 Security of the overall State commitment 132 Reporting and parliamentary accountability 133 Tripartite influence on Northern Rock’s business until December 136 Options for Northern Rock under consideration: September to November 137 Options for Northern Rock under consideration since December 140 Announcement on 21 January 2008 141 Annex 1: Meetings during visit to Stockholm, 26–28 November 2007 162 Annex 2: Relevant meetings during visit to Washington DC, 11–13 December 2007 163 The run on the Rock 3 Summary Overview The period from Friday 14 September 2007 to Monday 17 September saw the first run on the retail deposits of a United Kingdom bank since Victorian times. We analyse the causes and consequences of the run on Northern Rock, and the lessons to be learnt from it. We emphasise the advantages of legislative change on a cross-party basis and make proposals for such change, and for reforms of the Tripartite arrangements, on that basis. Northern Rock and its regulation The directors of Northern Rock were the principal authors of the difficulties that the company has faced since August 2007. The directors pursued a reckless business model which was excessively reliant on wholesale funding. The Financial Services Authority systematically failed in its regulatory duty to ensure that Northern Rock would not pose a systemic risk. Handling the support operation and stopping the run The Chancellor of the Exchequer was right to view Northern Rock as posing a systemic risk to the financial system and to authorise the Bank of England’s support facility. However, the Tripartite authorities did not prepare adequately for that support operation. Those authorities and Northern Rock ought to have strained every sinew to finalise the operation and announce it within hours rather than days of the decision to proceed with the operation. The Tripartite authorities at deputies level failed to plan in advance for the announcement of the Government guarantee on Northern Rock deposits that proved necessary to stop the run. Dealing with failing banks We recommend a series of measures for handling ‘failing’ banks in an orderly manner and in a way that insulates taxpayers and small depositors from the risk of banks failing. We recommend that a relevant authority be given power to acquire information relating to individual financial institutions and to take action in relation to an institution in specified circumstances. We also propose a special resolution regime for failing banks to enable smooth administration of such a bank to be combined with arrangements to ensure that insured deposits are safe and accessible. Depositor protection A deposit protection scheme must be simple and transparent. The “co-insurance” model of deposit protection—whereby small depositors stand to lose some of their money in the event of a bank closing—is discredited. Ensuring the speedy release of funds under any scheme is of critical importance, and we propose measures to provide for this. We recommend the establishment of a Deposit Protection Fund to be funded by participating institutions. 4 The run on the Rock Lessons learned There was a significant failure of the Tripartite arrangements in September 2007, and lessons must be learned from that failure. The financial system in the United Kingdom would not be well-served by a dismantling of the Tripartite arrangements. However, the current arrangements lack a clear leadership structure or a strategy for effective communication with the public. Reforms A single authority ought to be given the new powers for handling failing banks, together with responsibility for the Deposit Protection Fund. There is a need for ‘creative tension’ within the regulatory system, and so these powers and responsibilities should not be granted to the Financial Services Authority. We propose the creation of a new post of Deputy Governor of the Bank of England and Head of Financial Stability. We set out how this new post and the accompanying Office will relate to the existing responsibilities of the Bank of England and to the other Tripartite authorities. The run on the Rock 5 1 Introduction The run on the Rock 1. At 8.30 pm on the evening of Thursday 13 September 2007 the BBC reported that Northern Rock plc had asked for and received emergency financial support from the Bank of England.1 The terms of the funding facility were finalised in the early hours of Friday 14 September and announced at 7.00 am that day.2 That day, long queues began to form outside some of Northern Rock’s branches; later, its website collapsed and its phone lines were reported to be jammed.3 The first bank run in the United Kingdom since Victorian times was underway.4 In this Report we examine what caused the run on the Rock, the consequences of that run for Northern Rock itself and for wider financial stability, the way the events were handled by public authorities and the lessons to be learned.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Women Mps in Westminster Photographs Taken May 21St, June 3Rd, June 4Th, 2008
    “The House of Commons Works of Art Collection documents significant moments in Parliamentary history. We are delighted to have added this unique photographic record of women MPs of today, to mark the 90th anniversary of women first being able to take their seats in this House” – Hugo Swire, Chairman, The Speaker's Advisory Committee on Works of Art. “The day the Carlton Club accepted women” – 90 years after women first got the vote aim to ensure that a more enduring image of On May 21st 2008 over half of all women women's participation in the political process Members of Parliament in Westminster survives. gathered party by party to have group photographs taken to mark the anniversary of Each party gave its permission for the 90 years since women first got the vote (in photographs to be taken. For the Labour February 1918 women over 30 were first Party, Barbara Follett MP, the then Deputy granted the vote). Minister for Women and Equality, and Barbara Keeley MP, who was Chair of the Labour Party Women’s Committee and The four new composite Caroline Adams, who works for the photographs taken party by Parliamentary Labour Party helped ensure that all but 12 of the Labour women party aim to ensure that a attended. more enduring image of For the Conservative women's participation in the Party, The Shadow Leader of the House of political process survives Commons and Shadow Minister for Until now the most often used photographic Women, Theresa May image of women MPs had been the so called MP and the Chairman “Blair Babes” picture taken on 7th May 1997 of the Conservative shortly after 101 Labour women were elected Party, Caroline to Westminster as a result of positive action by Spelman MP, enlisted the Labour Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Aiming-High.Pdf
    AIMING HIGH About Policy Network Policy Network is an international thinktank and research institute. Its network spans national borders across Europe and the wider world with the aim of promot- ing the best progressive thinking on the major social and economic challenges of the 21st century. Our work is driven by a network of politicians, policymakers, business leaders, public service professionals, and academic researchers who work on long-term issues relating to public policy, political economy, social attitudes, governance and international affairs. This is complemented by the expertise and research excellence of Policy Network’s international team. A platform for research and ideas • Promoting expert ideas and political analysis on the key economic, social and political challenges of our age. • Disseminating research excellence and relevant knowledge to a wider public audience through interactive policy networks, including interdisciplinary and scholarly collaboration. • Engaging and informing the public debate about the future of European and global progressive politics. A network of leaders, policymakers and thinkers • Building international policy communities comprising individuals and affiliate institutions. • Providing meeting platforms where the politically active, and potential leaders of the future, can engage with each other across national borders and with the best thinkers who are sympathetic to their broad aims. • Engaging in external collaboration with partners including higher education institutions, the private sector, thinktanks, charities, community organisations, and trade unions. • Delivering an innovative events programme combining in-house seminars with large-scale public conferences designed to influence and contribute to key public debates. www.policy-network.net AIMING HIGH Progressive Politics in a High-Risk, High-Opportunity Era Edited by Florian Ranft London • New York Published by Rowman & Littlefield International Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • The Run on the Rock
    House of Commons Treasury Committee The run on the Rock Fifth Report of Session 2007–08 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 24 January 2008 HC 56–I [Incorporating HC 999 i–iv, Session 2006-07] Published on Saturday 26 January 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £20.00 The Treasury Committee The Treasury Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of HM Treasury, HM Revenue & Customs and associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon John McFall MP (Labour, West Dunbartonshire) (Chairman) Nick Ainger MP (Labour, Carmarthen West & South Pembrokeshire) Mr Graham Brady MP (Conservative, Altrincham and Sale West) Mr Colin Breed MP (Liberal Democrat, South East Cornwall) Jim Cousins MP (Labour, Newcastle upon Tyne Central) Mr Philip Dunne MP (Conservative, Ludlow) Mr Michael Fallon MP (Conservative, Sevenoaks) (Chairman, Sub-Committee) Ms Sally Keeble MP (Labour, Northampton North) Mr Andrew Love MP (Labour, Edmonton) Mr George Mudie MP (Labour, Leeds East) Mr Siôn Simon MP, (Labour, Birmingham, Erdington) John Thurso MP (Liberal Democrat, Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) Mr Mark Todd MP (Labour, South Derbyshire) Peter Viggers MP (Conservative, Gosport). Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • NEC Annual Report 2019
    Labour Party | Annual Report 2019 LABOUR PARTY ANNUAL REPORT 2019 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Treasurers’ Responsibilities . 54 Foreword from Jeremy Corbyn . 5 Independent Auditor’s Report Introduction from Tom Watson . 7 to the members of the Labour Party . 55 Introduction from the General Secretary . 9 Consolidated income and expenditure account 2018/2019 National Executive Committee . 10 for the year ended 31 December 2018 . 57 NEC Committees . 12 Statements of comprehensive income Obituaries . 13 and changes in equity for the year ended NEC aims and objectives for 2019 . 14 31 December 2018 . 58 Consolidated balance sheet BY-ELECTIONS . 15 at 31 December 2018 . 59 Peterborough . 16 Consolidated cash flow statement for the year Newport West . 17 ended 31 December 2018 . 60 ELECTIONS 2019 . 19 Notes to Financial Statements . 61 Analysis . 20 APPENDICES . 75 Local Government Report . 23 Members of Shadow Cabinet LOOKING AHEAD: 2020 ELECTIONS . 25 and Opposition Frontbench . 76 The year ahead in Scotland . 26 Parliamentary Labour Party . 80 The year ahead in Wales . 27 Members of the Scottish Parliament. 87 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 29 Members of the Welsh Assembly . 88 Members and Supporters Members of the European Parliament . 89 Renewing our party and building an active Directly Elected Mayors . 90 membership and supporters network . 30 Members of the London Assembly . 91 Equalities . 31 Leaders of Labour Groups . 92 Labour Peers . 100 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 35 Labour Police and Crime Commissioners . 103 National Policy Forum Parliamentary Candidates endorsed NPF Report . 36 by the NEC at time of publication . 104 NEC PRIORITIES FOR 2019 . 39 NEC Disputes . 107 International NCC Cases .
    [Show full text]
  • Formal Minutes
    House of Commons Treasury Committee Formal Minutes Session 2008–09 Treasury Committee: Formal Minutes 2008–09 1 Proceedings of the Committee Thursday 4 December 2008 John McFall, in the Chair Nick Ainger Ms Sally Keeble Mr Graham Brady Mr Andrew Love Jim Cousins Mr Mark Todd Mr Stephen Crabb Sir Peter Viggers Mr Michael Fallon 1. New Member Mr Stephen Crabb disclosed his interests, pursuant to the resolution of the House of 13 July 2002. For details of declaration of interests, see appendix 1. 2. Specialist Advisers (declaration of interests) The interests of the following specialist advisers were disclosed: Mr Roger Bootle, Professor David Heald, Professor David Miles, Professor Anton Muscatelli, Ms Bridget Rosewell, Professor Colin Talbot and Professor Geoffrey Wood. For details of declaration of interests, see appendix 2. 3. The Committee’s programme of work The Committee considered this matter. 4. Pre-Budget Report 2008 Ordered, That the following written evidence relating to the Pre-Budget Report 2008 be reported to the House for publication on the internet: Child Poverty Action Group, ACCA, Association of Friendly Societies, Professor David Heald, Professor Colin Talbot, John Whiting, and the New Policy Institute. Mr Robert Chote, Director, Institute for Fiscal Studies; Mr Roger Bootle, Managing Director, Capital Economics; Mr Simon Kirby, Research Fellow, National Institute of Economic and Social Research; Professor Colin Talbot, Professor of Public Policy and Management, Manchester Business School and Mr John Whiting, PwC and Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG), gave oral evidence. Mr Mike Brewer, Director, Institute for Fiscal Studies, Ms Teresa Perchard, Director of Public Policy, Citizens Advice, Mr Mervyn Kohler, Head of Public Affairs, Help the Aged, Mr Peter Kenway, Director, New Policy Institute, and Mr John Whiting, PwC and Low Incomes Tax Reform Group (LITRG), gave oral evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation Submitted to The
    WHEN DOES HE SPEAK FOR SHE? MEN REPRESENTING WOMEN IN PARLIAMENT By MARY K. NUGENT A dissertation submitted to the School of Graduate Studies Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Political Science Written under the direction of Mona Lena Krook And approved by _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ _____________________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey May, 2019 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION When Does He Speak for She? Men Representing Women in Parliament. by MARY K. NUGENT Dissertation Director: Mona Lena Krook This project develops our understanding of the representation of women’s interests in politics by considering the role that men can play in advancing the substantive representation of women (SRW). I draw on the case of the United Kingdom Parliament, which over the last three decades has seen significant changes in the sex balance of Members of Parliament (MPs) in the House of Commons. Using quantitative analysis of two legislative activities – Early Day Motions, and the annual International Women’s Day Debates – I first establish the patterns of men’s engagement in SRW. I argue that men’s role in representation women can be understood as what I term an “ancillary representatives” for women, which is a role that draws on a vantage point not accessible to women to help advance the SRW, while also remains secondary to women’s leadership role. The role played by men remains fairly consistent over time, with some evidence of a mainstreaming of women’s issues over time as the number of women in politics ii increases.
    [Show full text]
  • From DETR to Dft Via DTLR, What Are the Potential Implications for Transport Planning of These Changes in Departmental Organisation?
    This position paper has been produced with the kind support of the Transport Planning Society through the award of a study bursary to the author. From DETR to DfT via DTLR, what are the potential implications for transport planning of these changes in departmental organisation? Dr Mark Beecroft, Transportation Research Group, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, [email protected] Abstract This essay explores the relationship between transport and environment in government. It focuses upon the creation and eventual break-up of the Department for Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR). It discusses the potential consequences of separation taking into account how the new arrangements under the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) and the Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (DTLR) worked in the year following reorganisation. It then considers the implications of the further reorganisation brought by the creation of a dedicated Department for Transport (DfT) and the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) in May 2002. Introduction: The Early Years - Transport and the Environment 1970-1997 The benefits claimed for reorganisation are debatable. As well as signalling political intention, they may give a fresh perspective to policy-making by bringing together topics which had previously been kept apart, but they may also separate other topics which had usefully been held together (Glaister et al, 1998). Changing Whitehall departments requires an enormous amount of time and energy. Moving staff, reformulating objectives, restructuring management can all in the short term impede a Government's ability to deliver its electoral mandate.
    [Show full text]
  • All Party Parliamentary Group on Population, Development and Reproductive Health
    ALL PARTY PARLIAMENTARY GROUP ON POPULATION, DEVELOPMENT AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ANNUAL REVIEW OF ACTIVITIES 2005/2006 1 2 All Party Parliamentary Group on Population, Development and Reproductive Health Annual Review 2005/2006 CONTENTS Page FOREWORD 5 COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND STAFF 7 NEW GROUP MEMBERS APRIL 2005 - MARCH 2006 8 APPG PD&RH AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 10 PARLIAMENTARY ACTIVITIES 11 APPG on PD&RH Committee Meetings 11 APPG on PD&RH Parliamentary Briefing Meetings 11 Other Briefing Meetings 13 European Meetings 17 Inter-European Parliamentary Forum on Population and Development 17 EuroNGO 18 Council of Europe 18 Study Tours 19 Bangladesh 19 China 19 General Written Briefings 19 General Correspondence 22 Parliamentary Statements, Debates, Questions and 22 Early Day Motions House of Commons 22 Statements Debates Early Day Motions Oral and written questions House of Lords 32 Statements Debates Oral and written questions 3 CONTENTS (cont.) Meetings and Correspondence with DfID and 35 DfID Select Committee Meetings 35 Correspondence 36 Consultations 37 Workshops 37 DfID Departmental Report 2005 38 International Funding to Sexual and 39 Reproductive Health and Rights, Population and HIV/AIDS International Conferences 41 G8 International Parliamentarians Conference on 41 Development in Africa, Edinburgh, Scotland World Summit, New York, USA 41 Inter Parliamentary Union Conference on 42 Violence against Women, Dakar, Senegal Demography, Reproductive Health and 42 Sustainable Economic Growth in Africa, Paris, France Support to other Countries’
    [Show full text]
  • The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
    Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons dated 6 July 2016 for The Report of the Iraq Inquiry Report of a Committee of Privy Counsellors Volume XI Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 6 July 2016 HC 265-XI 46561_43b Viking_Volume XI Title Page.indd 1 17/06/2016 15:34 © Crown copyright 2016 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identifi ed any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] Print ISBN 9781474110136 Web ISBN 9781474110143 ID 23051601 46561 07/16 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fi bre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Offi ce 46561_43b Viking_Volume XI Title Page.indd 2 17/06/2016 15:34 Volume XI CONTENTS 14.1 Military equipment (post-conflict) 1 14.2 Conclusions: Military equipment (post-conflict) 227 15.1 Civilian personnel 243 15.2 Conclusions: Civilian personnel 411 46561_43b Viking_Volume XI Title Page.indd 3 17/06/2016 15:34 46561_43b Viking_Volume XI Title Page.indd 4 17/06/2016 15:34 SECTION 14.1 MILITARY EQUIPMENT (POST‑CONFLICT) Contents Introduction .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mutual Action, Common Purpose.Qxp
    FABIAN SOCIETY Freethinking Mutual Action, Common Purpose: Empowering the Third Sector Chaired by the Rt Hon David Blunkett MP About the author DAVID BLUNKETT Acknowledgements Thanks are due to Tom Levitt MP, Rt Hon Alun Michael MP, Margaret Moran MP, Richard Burden MP, Sally Keeble MP, Fiona Mactaggart MP, Andy Reed MP, Baroness Glenys Thornton, Celia Barlow MP, David Borrow MP, Rob Flello MP, Baroness Mary Goudie, Ian Lucas MP, Baroness Julia Neuberger, Baroness Jill Pitkeathley, Christine Russell MP, Lord Andrew Stone. FABIAN SOCIETY Freethinking The Fabian Society is Britain’s leading left of centre think tank and political society, committed to creating the political ideas and policy debates which can shape the future of progressive politics. With over 300 Fabian MPs, MEPs, Peers, MSPs and AMs, the Society plays an unparalleled role in linking the ability to influence policy debates at the highest level with vigorous grassroots debate among our growing membership of over 7000 people, 70 local branches meeting regularly throughout Britain and a vibrant Young Fabian section and the Fabian Women’s Network, both organising their own activities. Fabian publications, events and ideas therefore reach and influence a wider audience than those of any comparable think tank. The Society is unique among think tanks in being a thriving, democratically-constituted membership organisation, affiliated to the Labour Party but organisationally and editorially independent. For over 120 years Fabians have been central to every important renewal and revision of left of centre thinking. The Fabian commitment to open and participatory debate is as important today as ever before as we explore the ideas, politics and policies which will define the next generation of progressive politics in Britain, Europe and around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Debt Relief (Developing Countries) Bill: Committee Stage Report Bill 83 of 2009-10 (As Amended; Bill 17 As Introduced) RESEARCH PAPER 10/26 11 March 2010
    Debt Relief (Developing Countries) Bill: Committee Stage Report Bill 83 of 2009-10 (as amended; Bill 17 as introduced) RESEARCH PAPER 10/26 11 March 2010 This is a Private Member’s Bill, introduced by Andrew Gwynne MP on 16 December 2009, and published on 19 February 2010. The Bill had its Second Reading on 26 February, and had its Committee Stage on 9 March; with Report Stage scheduled for 12 March. This is a report on the Committee Stage of the Bill. It complements Research Paper 10/17 on the Bill as presented and considered at Second Reading. The Bill seeks to limit the amount that can be recovered by any commercial creditor of a set of countries designated as having unsustainable external debts. It would apply to those countries eligible for the IMF/World Bank Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) initiative. The legislation would restrict the activities of so-called ‘vulture funds’, which buy developing countries’ sovereign debt at discounted prices, then seek to recover its value in full through the courts. Successful claims would be limited to an internationally agreed level, and apply equally to all commercial creditors. Debts incurred after the Bill’s entry into force would be excluded. In Committee, a new ‘sunset clause’ was added. The proposed legislation would now expire after one year unless renewed for a further year or made permanent by order. Ian Townsend Recent Research Papers 10/16 Sustainable Communities Act 2007 (Amendment) Bill [Bill 21 of 2009-10] 24.02.10 10/17 Debt Relief (Developing Countries) Bill [Bill 17 of
    [Show full text]
  • Prisons Run by the CIA in Eastern Europe and Elsewhere
    statewatch monitoring the state and civil liberties in Europe vol 17 no 2 July 2007 FOI back on the EU agenda: Statewatch lodges two complaints against the European Commission Statewatch has lodged two complaints against the European The Commission’s public register of documents only Commission with the European Ombudsman. The first concerns contains legislative texts and adopted Commission reports (COM the Commission's failure to maintain a proper public register of and SEC documents). It does not include the vast majority of documents as it is obliged to do under the Regulation on access documents produced or received by the Commission. In its to EU documents (1049/2001). The second concerns the annual reports the Commission has simply spoken of gradually Commission's failure to produce its annual report on access to "improving" its register. Whereas Article 11.1 of the Regulation documents for 2005 in the year 2006. Statewatch says both are says: "References to documents shall be recorded in the register breaches of the Regulation and therefore cases of without delay." maladministration. In a press release Tony Bunyan, Director of The European Ombudsman accepted Statewatch's complaint Statewatch, commented: on 23 October 2006 and it took the Commission six months to The European Commission is not above the law it is the custodian of respond. Extraordinarily the reply by President of the EU law, responsible for ensuring it is properly implemented. This Commission contested the provision of Article 11.1 by saying: makes it all the more reprehensible that under the Regulation on It does not stipulate that public registers should include references to access to documents the Commission has failed to maintain a proper all documents register of documents and failed to publish an annual report for 2005.
    [Show full text]