DOCSLIB.ORG

GACC Detailed Situation Report - by Protection

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GACC Detailed Situation Report - by Protection GACC Detailed Situation Report - by Protection Report Date: Sep 29, 2021 Geographic Area: Eastern Area Coordination Center Preparedness Level: II 0 Wildfire Activity: Agency Unit Name Unit ID Fire P/ New New Uncntrld Human Human Lightning Lightning Total Total Danger L Fires Acres Fires Fires Acres Fires Acres Fires Acres (YTD) (YTD) (YTD) (YTD) BIA Sac and Fox Agency IA-SFA L 1 0 0 0 4 290 0 0 4 290 Passamaquoddy Tribe ME-PAA L 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Michigan Agency MI-MIA L 1 0 0 0 13 2 0 0 13 2 Minnesota Agency MN-MNA H 2 0 0 0 164 1,219 0 0 164 1,219 Midwest Regional Office MN-MRA M 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Red Lake Agency MN-RLA H 2 0 0 0 385 11,219 0 0 385 11,219 Tonawanda Band of Seneca NY-TON N/R Tuscarora Nation NY-TUS N/R Great Lakes Agency WI-GLA N/R Menominee Tribe WI-MEA N/R BIA 0 0 0 566 12,730 0 0 566 12,730 DHS Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection CT-FEM N/R New Jersey Office of Emergency Management NJ-FEM N/R New York FEMA NY-DHS N/R Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency PA-FEM N/R West Virginia Division of Homeland Security and Emergency WV-FEM N/R Management DHS DOD Crane Naval Weapons Depot IN-CNWQ L 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Westover Air Force Base MA-WEQ N/R Aberdeen Proving Grounds (PA-MACC) MD-ABQ L 1 0 0 0 15 3 1 0 16 3 Aberdeen Proving Grounds (WV-CAC) MD-ABQ N/R Sep 29, 2021 1 11:58:26 PM GACC Detailed Situation Report - by Protection Report Date: Sep 29, 2021 Geographic Area: Eastern Area Coordination Center Preparedness Level: II Wildfire Activity: Agency Unit Name Unit ID Fire P/ New New Uncntrld Human Human Lightning Lightning Total Total Danger L Fires Acres Fires Fires Acres Fires Acres Fires Acres (YTD) (YTD) (YTD) (YTD) DOD New Boston Air Force Station NH-NBQ N/R Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst) NJ-JBQ L 1 0 0 0 6 4,703 0 0 6 4,703 Fort Drum Military Reservation NY-FDQ N/R West Point Military Reservation NY-WPQ N/R DOD 0 0 0 21 4,706 1 0 22 4,706 FS Midewin National Tall Grass Prairie IL-MPF N/R Shawnee National Forest IL-SHF N/R 13 95 13 95 Hoosier National Forest IN-HOF L 1 0 0 0 8 23 0 0 8 23 Hiawatha National Forest MI-HIF M 1 0 0 0 23 98 1 0 24 98 Huron-Manistee National Forest MI-HMF M 1 0 0 0 107 6,289 1 0 108 6,289 Ottawa National Forest MI-OTF L 1 0 0 0 10 5 1 0 11 5 Chippewa National Forest MN-CPF M 2 0 0 0 59 79 2 4 61 83 Superior National Forest MN-SUF M 3 0 0 0 29 161 36 28,794 65 28,955 Mark Twain National Forest MO-MTF L 2 2 11 0 111 8,079 0 0 111 8,079 White Mountain National Forest NH-WMF L 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Wayne National Forest (OH-OIC) OH-WAF N/R Wayne National Forest (PA-MACC) OH-WAF L 1 0 0 0 35 88 0 0 35 88 Allegheny National Forest (PA-MACC) PA-ALF L 1 0 0 0 15 35 0 0 15 35 Allegheny National Forest (WV-CAC) PA-ALF N/R Green Mountain National Forest VT-GMF L 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest WI-CNF N/R 11 14 1 1 12 15 Sep 29, 2021 2 11:58:26 PM GACC Detailed Situation Report - by Protection Report Date: Sep 29, 2021 Geographic Area: Eastern Area Coordination Center Preparedness Level: II Wildfire Activity: Agency Unit Name Unit ID Fire P/ New New Uncntrld Human Human Lightning Lightning Total Total Danger L Fires Acres Fires Fires Acres Fires Acres Fires Acres (YTD) (YTD) (YTD) (YTD) FS Monongahela National Forest (PA-MACC) WV-MOF L 1 0 0 0 6 40 0 0 6 40 Monongahela National Forest (WV-CAC) WV-MOF N/R FS 2 11 0 429 15,007 42 28,799 471 43,806 FWS Stewart B. McKinney National Wildlife Refuge CT-SMR N/R Bombay Hook National Wildlife Refuge DE-BHR N/R Prime Hook National Wildlife Refuge DE-PHR N/R Driftless National Wildlife Refuge IA-DAR N/R DeSoto National Wildlife Refuge IA-DSR N/R McGregor District Upper Mississippi River Complex IA-MGR N/R Neal Smith National Wildlife Refuge IA-NSR N/R Port Louisa National Wildlife Refuge IA-PLR N/R Union Slough National Wildlife Refuge IA-USR N/R Iowa Wetland Management District IA-WTR N/R Crab Orchard National Wildlife Refuge IL-COR N/R 2 2 2 2 Cypress Creek National Wildlife Refuge IL-CYR N/R Illinois River National Wildlife Refuge IL-ILR N/R Middle Mississippi National Wildlife Refuge IL-MMR N/R Mark Twain National Wildlife Refuge IL-MTR N/R Savanna District Upper Mississippi National Wildlife Refuge IL-SVR N/R Two Rivers National Wildlife Refuge IL-TWR N/R Big Oaks National Wildlife Refuge IN-BOR N/R 1 277 1 277 Sep 29, 2021 3 11:58:26 PM GACC Detailed Situation Report - by Protection Report Date: Sep 29, 2021 Geographic Area: Eastern Area Coordination Center Preparedness Level: II Wildfire Activity: Agency Unit Name Unit ID Fire P/ New New Uncntrld Human Human Lightning Lightning Total Total Danger L Fires Acres Fires Fires Acres Fires Acres Fires Acres (YTD) (YTD) (YTD) (YTD) FWS Muscatatuck National Wildlife Refuge IN-MSR N/R Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge IN-PKR N/R Assabet River National Wildlife Refuge MA-ABR N/R Berkshire National Fish Hatchery MA-BKR N/R Eastern Massachusetts National Wildlife Refuge Complex MA-EMR N/R Great Meadows National Wildlife Refuge MA-GMR N/R Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge MA-MMR N/R Massasoit National Wildlife Refuge MA-MSR N/R North Attleboro National Fish Hatchery MA-NAR N/R Nomans Land Island National Wildlife Refuge MA-NIR N/R Nantucket National Wildlife Refuge MA-NTR N/R Oxbow National Wildlife Refuge MA-OBR N/R Parker River National Wildlife Refuge MA-PRR N/R Richard Cronin Aquatic Resource Center MA-RCR N/R Sylvio O. Conte National Wildlife Refuge MA-SCR N/R Thatcher Island National Wildlife Refuge MA-TIR N/R Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge MD-BWR N/R Chesapeake Bay Ecological Service Field Office MD-CESR N/R Chesapeake Marshlands National Wildlife Refuge MD-CMR N/R Eastern Neck National Wildlife Refuge MD-ENR N/R Martin National Wildlife Refuge MD-MTR N/R Sep 29, 2021 4 11:58:26 PM GACC Detailed Situation Report - by Protection Report Date: Sep 29, 2021 Geographic Area: Eastern Area Coordination Center Preparedness Level: II Wildfire Activity: Agency Unit Name Unit ID Fire P/ New New Uncntrld Human Human Lightning Lightning Total Total Danger L Fires Acres Fires Fires Acres Fires Acres Fires Acres (YTD) (YTD) (YTD) (YTD) FWS Patuxent National Wildlife Refuge MD-PWR N/R Susquehanna National Wildlife Refuge MD-SQR N/R Arrostook National Wildlife Refuge ME-ARR N/R Craig Brook National Fish Hatchery ME-CBR N/R Cross Island National Wildlife Refuge ME-CIR N/R Maine Coastal Islands National Wildlife Refuge Complex ME-CMR N/R Carlton Pond Waterfowl Production Area ME-CPR N/R Franklin Island National Wildlife Refuge ME-FIR N/R Green Lake National Fish Hatchery ME-GLR N/R Maine Ecological Services ME-MESR N/R Moosehorn National Wildlife Refuge ME-MHR N/R Pond Island National Wildlife Refuge ME-PIR N/R Petit Manan National Wildlife Refuge ME-PMR N/R Rachel Carson National Wildlife Refuge ME-RCR N/R Sunkhaze Meadows National Wildlife Refuge ME-SHR N/R Seal Island National Wildlife Refuge ME-SIR N/R Seney National Wildlife Refuge MI-SNR M 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shiawassee National Wildlife Refuge MI-SSR L 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Agassiz National Wildlife Refuge MN-AGR VH 3 0 0 0 3 246 0 0 3 246 Big Stone National Wildlife Refuge MN-BGR M 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 Morris National Wildlife Refuge MN-BNR M 3 0 0 0 3 57 0 0 3 57 Sep 29, 2021 5 11:58:26 PM GACC Detailed Situation Report - by Protection Report Date: Sep 29, 2021 Geographic Area: Eastern Area Coordination Center Preparedness Level: II Wildfire Activity: Agency Unit Name Unit ID Fire P/ New New Uncntrld Human Human Lightning Lightning Total Total Danger L Fires Acres Fires Fires Acres Fires Acres Fires Acres (YTD) (YTD) (YTD) (YTD) FWS Crane Meadows National Wildlife Refuge MN-CMR L 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detroit Lakes Wetland Management District MN-DLR M 3 0 0 0 5 236 0 0 5 236 Fergus Falls Wetland Management District MN-FFR M 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 Glacial Ridge MN-GLR H 3 0 0 0 3 12,833 0 0 3 12,833 Hamden Slough National Wildlife Refuge MN-HSR M 3 0 0 0 1 226 0 0 1 226 Litchfield Wetland Management District MN-LFR M 2 0 0 0 7 290 0 0 7 290 Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge MN-MVR L 2 0 0 0 6 52 0 0 6 52 Rice Lake National Wildlife Refuge MN-RLR L 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rydell National Wildlife Refuge MN-RYR H 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sherburne National Wildlife Refuge MN-SBR L 2 0 0 0 4 31 0 0 4 31 Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge MN-TMR M 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Winona District of the Upper Mississippi Complex MN-WNR L 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Windom Wetland Management District MN-WWR M 2 0 0 0 6 127 0 0 6 127 Big Muddy National Wildlife Refuge MO-BMR N/R Great Rivers National Wildlife Refuge MO-GRR N/R Mingo National Wildlife Refuge MO-MOR N/R Squaw Creek National Wildlife Refuge MO-SQR N/R Swan Lake National Wildlife Refuge MO-SWR N/R Boyer Chute National Wildlife Refuge NE-BCR N/R Great Bay National Wildlife Refuge NH-GBR N/R John Hay National Wildlife Refuge NH-JHR N/R Sep 29, 2021 6 11:58:26 PM GACC Detailed Situation Report - by Protection Report Date: Sep 29, 2021 Geographic Area: Eastern Area Coordination Center Preparedness Level: II Wildfire Activity: Agency Unit Name Unit ID Fire P/ New New Uncntrld Human Human Lightning Lightning Total Total Danger L Fires Acres Fires Fires Acres Fires Acres Fires Acres (YTD) (YTD) (YTD) (YTD) FWS New England Ecological Services Field Office NH-NESR N/R Nashua National Fish Hatchery NH-NUR N/R Lake Umbagog National Wildlife Refuge NH-UBR N/R Wapack National Wildlife Refuge NH-WPR N/R Cape May National Wildlife Refuge NJ-CMR N/R 1 0 1 0 Edwin B.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bud Heinselman and the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, 1964–65 KEVIN PROESCHOLDT
    FIRST FIGHT Bud Heinselman and the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, 1964–65 KEVIN PROESCHOLDT innesotan Miron L. “Bud” Heinselman worked swamp black spruce on peatlands. Heinselman’s doctoral Mhis entire career for the U.S. Forest Service as a for- dissertation centered on peatlands ecology in the basin of ester and ecologist. Through his extensive research, he be- the former glacial Lake Agassiz in Minnesota; the presti- came one of the nation’s foremost experts in the separate gious scientific journal, Ecological Monographs, published fields of peatlands, forest ecology, and fire ecology. Beyond these findings in 1963. He was a careful and meticulous those quiet scientific accomplishments, Heinselman also researcher, not one to overstate his findings.2 played a very public role in leading the citizen effort from By 1960 Heinselman was living in Grand Rapids, Min- 1976 to 1978 to pass the 1978 Boundary Waters Canoe Area nesota, continuing research for the Forest Service’s Lake Wilderness (BWCAW) Act through Congress, providing States Forest Experiment Station. He had always been new protections for the area.1 interested in conservation and had joined several non- But a dozen years earlier, Heinselman had cut his ad- profit organizations, including the Izaak Walton League vocacy teeth on another campaign to protect the million- of America (IWLA). He became active in the “Ikes,” was acre Boundary Waters Canoe Area (BWCA), as it was then president of its Grand Rapids chapter in the early 1960s, known. From 1964 to 1965, largely out of the public view, and served on the IWLA Minnesota Division’s Wilderness he organized conservationists with enthusiasm and a clear Committee, chaired by his Grand Rapids friend Adolph T.
    [Show full text]
  • MN CWCS, Links to Other Plans
    Appendix C: MN CWCS, Links to other plans Appendix C Tomorrow’s Habitat for the Wild and Rare: An Action Plan for Minnesota Wildlife Links to Other Plans (organized alphabetically by subsection) Appendix C. Links to other plans 1 Tomorrow’s Habitat for the Wild and Rare: An Action Plan for Minnesota Wildlife V09.28.2005 Appendix C: MN CWCS, Links to other plans Agassiz Lowlands A. Other Plans/Efforts in Subsection Plan Page Composition Succession/ development Spatial Sites Agassiz Lowlands Subsection pp. ii, iii, 3- - Key changes in forest composition include - Ideally, a cover type has - Patches will be - Consult the Natural Heritage Database Forest Resource Management 4 to 3-9 more acres of jack pine (+5400 acres), white a balance of age classes to distributed in a during stand selection, and field visits, to Plan (SFRMP), Dec. 2002 pine (+988 acres), red pine (+1953 acres), provide a sustainable range of ages and identify known locations of rare species or upland tamarack (+615 acres), upland white range of wildlife habitat sizes characteristic plant communities of concern. cedar (+1510 acres), spruce/fir (+2500 acres), and forest products. One of the - Consult with the Regional Non-game and northern hardwoods (+619 acres) than the goal of this plan is to landscape. (p. 3- Specialist or the Regional Plant Ecologist if a acres of these species found there now. manage toward that 24) new location for a rare species is found - Retain or increase oak as a stand component balance, which includes a during this plan period, if a new species is (up to 2000 acres).
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Summary
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 1999 NATURAL RESOURCES LEGISLATION A SUMMARY OF THE ACTIONS OF THE 1999 REGULAR SESSION OF THE EIGHTY-FIRST MINNESOTA LEGISLATURE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES LEGISLATIVE UNIT AUGUST, 1999 1999 Department of Natural Resources Legislative Summary -Table of Contents- General Natural Resources Administration 1 General Rules 2 Enforcement 3 Fish and Wildlife 4 Forestry 5 Lands and Minerals 6 Parks 7 Trails and Waterways 8 Waters 9 Omnibus Environment, Natural Resources, and Agriculture Appropriations Bill 10-18 GENERAL NATURAL RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION CH249 TECHNICAL BILL - REVISORS HF(2441) SF2224 An act relating to legislative enactments; correcting technical errors; amending Minnesota Statutes 1998, sections 97A.075, subd. 1; 124D.135, subd. 3, as amended; 124D.54, subd. 1, as amended; 256.476, subd. 8, as amended; 322B.115, subd. 4; SF 626, section 44; SF 2221, article 1, section 2, subd. 4; section 7, subd. 6; section 8, subd. 3; section 12, subd. 1; section 13, subd. 1; section 18; SF 2226, section 5, subd. 4; section 6; HF 1825, section 12; HF 2390, article 1, section 2, subds. 2 and 4; section 4, subd. 4; section 17, subd. 1; article 2, section 81; HF 2420, article 5, section 18; article 6, section 2; proposing coding in Minnesota Statutes 1998, chapter 126C. EFFECTIVE: Various Dates - 1 - GENERAL RULES CH250 OMNIBUS STATE DEPARTMENT APPROPRIATIONS BILL HF878 SF(1464) Removes the ability for state agencies to impose a new fee or increase existing fees by rule as of July 1, 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Synthesis for Voyageurs National Park
    Aquatic Synthesis for Voyageurs National Park Information and Technology Report USGS/BRD/ITR—2003-0001 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Technical Report Series The Biological Resources Division publishes scientific and technical articles and reports resulting from the research performed by our scientists and partners. These articles appear in professional journals around the world. Reports are published in two report series: Biological Science Reports and Information and Technology Reports. Series Descriptions Biological Science Reports ISSN 1081-292X Information and Technology Reports ISSN 1081-2911 This series records the significant findings resulting These reports are intended for publication of book- from sponsored and co-sponsored research programs. length monographs; synthesis documents; compilations They may include extensive data or theoretical analyses. of conference and workshop papers; important planning Papers in this series are held to the same peer-review and and reference materials such as strategic plans, standard high-quality standards as their journal counterparts. operating procedures, protocols, handbooks, and manuals; and data compilations such as tables and bibliographies. Papers in this series are held to the same peer-review and high-quality standards as their journal counterparts. Copies of this publication are available from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161 (1-800-553-6847 or 703-487-4650). Copies also are available to registered users from the Defense Technical Information Center, Attn.: Help Desk, 8725 Kingman Road, Suite 0944, Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060-6218 (1-800-225-3842 or 703-767-9050). An electronic version of this report is available on-line at: <http://www.cerc.usgs.gov/pubs/center/pdfdocs/ITR2003-0001.pdf> Front cover: Aerial photo looking east over Namakan Lake, Voyageurs National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Voyageurs National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Voyageurs National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2007/007 THIS PAGE: A geologist highlights a geologic contact during a Geologic Resource Evaluation scoping field trip at Voyageurs NP, MN ON THE COVER: Aerial view of Voyageurs NP, MN NPS Photos Voyageurs National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2007/007 Geologic Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225 June 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer- reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. Natural Resource Reports are the designated medium for disseminating high priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. Examples of the diverse array of reports published in this series include vital signs monitoring plans; "how to" resource management papers; proceedings of resource management workshops or conferences; annual reports of resource programs or divisions of the Natural Resource Program Center; resource action plans; fact sheets; and regularly- published newsletters.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota State Parks.Pdf
    Table of Contents 1. Afton State Park 4 2. Banning State Park 6 3. Bear Head Lake State Park 8 4. Beaver Creek Valley State Park 10 5. Big Bog State Park 12 6. Big Stone Lake State Park 14 7. Blue Mounds State Park 16 8. Buffalo River State Park 18 9. Camden State Park 20 10. Carley State Park 22 11. Cascade River State Park 24 12. Charles A. Lindbergh State Park 26 13. Crow Wing State Park 28 14. Cuyuna Country State Park 30 15. Father Hennepin State Park 32 16. Flandrau State Park 34 17. Forestville/Mystery Cave State Park 36 18. Fort Ridgely State Park 38 19. Fort Snelling State Park 40 20. Franz Jevne State Park 42 21. Frontenac State Park 44 22. George H. Crosby Manitou State Park 46 23. Glacial Lakes State Park 48 24. Glendalough State Park 50 25. Gooseberry Falls State Park 52 26. Grand Portage State Park 54 27. Great River Bluffs State Park 56 28. Hayes Lake State Park 58 29. Hill Annex Mine State Park 60 30. Interstate State Park 62 31. Itasca State Park 64 32. Jay Cooke State Park 66 33. John A. Latsch State Park 68 34. Judge C.R. Magney State Park 70 1 35. Kilen Woods State Park 72 36. Lac qui Parle State Park 74 37. Lake Bemidji State Park 76 38. Lake Bronson State Park 78 39. Lake Carlos State Park 80 40. Lake Louise State Park 82 41. Lake Maria State Park 84 42. Lake Shetek State Park 86 43.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota in Profile
    Minnesota in Profile Chapter One Minnesota in Profile Minnesota in Profile ....................................................................................................2 Vital Statistical Trends ........................................................................................3 Population ...........................................................................................................4 Education ............................................................................................................5 Employment ........................................................................................................6 Energy .................................................................................................................7 Transportation ....................................................................................................8 Agriculture ..........................................................................................................9 Exports ..............................................................................................................10 State Parks...................................................................................................................11 National Parks, Monuments and Recreation Areas ...................................................12 Diagram of State Government ...................................................................................13 Political Landscape (Maps) ........................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Voyageurs National Park Visitor Study
    Voyageurs National Park Visitor Study The Visitor Services Project 2 OMB Approval 1024-0000 Expiration Date: 8-31-98 3 DIRECTIONS One adult in your group should complete the questionnaire. It should only take a few minutes. When you have completed the questionnaire, please seal it with the sticker provided and drop it in any U.S. mailbox. We appreciate your help. PRIVACY ACT and PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT statement: 16 U.S.C. 1a-7 authorizes collection of this information. This information will be used by park managers to better serve the public. Response to this request is voluntary. No action may be taken against you for refusing to supply the information requested. Your name is requested for follow-up mailing purposes only. When analysis of the questionnaire is completed, all name and address files will be destroyed. Thus the permanent data will be anonymous. Please do not put your name or that of any member of your group on the questionnaire. Data collected through visitor surveys may be disclosed to the Department of Justice when relevant to litigation or anticipated litigation, or to appropriate Federal, State, local or foreign agencies responsible for investigating or prosecuting a violation of law. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Burden estimate statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 12 minutes per response. Direct comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB, Attention Desk Officer for the Interior Department, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry Division
    MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Minnesota State Archives CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT Forestry Division An Inventory of Its Administrative Subject Files OVERVIEW OF THE RECORDS Agency: Minnesota. Division of Forestry. Series Title: Administrative subject files. Dates: 1900-1978. Quantity: 19.2 cu. ft. (19 boxes and 1 partial box) Location: See Detailed Description section for box locations. SCOPE AND CONTENTS OF THE RECORDS Subject files documenting the administrative aspects of the division's activities and duties. Including correspondence, photographs, reports, statistics, studies, financial records, circular letters, policy directives, land use permits, operational orders, and conservation work project plans and programs, the files document such topics as state forest and lands management, timber law, multiple use, land acquisition and sale or exchange, campgrounds and picnic areas, public access and boating, wilderness areas, wildlife management, forest fire protection and prevention, tax-forfeiture, roads and trails, state parks, environmental education, land ownership, forestation, Civilian Conservation Corps camp locations, federal land grants, school and Volstead lands, mining, lakeshore, peat, road right-of-ways, natural and scientific areas, watersheds, lake levels, Shipstead-Nolan Act, slash disposal, county and private forests, tree farms, school forests, and nursery programs. The files also document the division's relations with the Youth Conservation Commission, Keep Minnesota Green, Inc., U. S. Soil Conservation Service, U. S. Forest Service, Izaak Walton League, Minnesota Outdoor Recreation Resources Commission, Minnesota Resources Commission, and various of the other Conservation Department's divisions. Areas particularly highlighted in the files include the Minnesota Memorial Hardwood State Forest, Boundary Waters Canoe Area, Itasca State Park, Chippewa National Forest, Kabetogama State Forest, Grand Portage State Forest, Voyageurs National Park, Quetico-Superior, and Superior National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks and Trails Legacy Plan Parks and Trails of State and Regional Significance a 25-Year Long-Range Plan for Minnesota
    Parks and Trails Legacy Plan Parks and Trails of State and Regional Significance A 25-year long-range plan for Minnesota February 14, 2011 ©2011, State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is available to all individuals regardless of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, public assistance status, age, sexual orientation, disability or activity on behalf of a local human rights commission. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to Minnesota DNR, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4049; or the Equal Opportunity Office, Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240. This information is available in a different format upon request of persons of all abilities. February 14, 2011 It is our pleasure to introduce the Parks and Trails Minnesotans will look back and say the Parks and Legacy Plan. Funding created by the Legacy Trails Legacy Amendment accomplished what they Amendment gives us a unique opportunity to hoped for—and more. improve and expand Minnesota’s parks and trails of state and regional significance. This allows us to The plan recognizes the world‑class network of look out 25 years to envision a future in which parks parks and trails Minnesota currently has in place. It and trails play a significant role in the lives of all proposes to build on this foundation, making user Minnesotans. experiences even better. It is based on four strategic directions that together ensure a great future for parks Our extensive 18-month public engagement effort and trails: allows us to confidently state that this is a parks and • Connect people and the outdoors.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Statewide Multiple Property Documentation Form for the Woodland Tradition
    Minnesota Statewide Multiple Property Documentation Form for the Woodland Tradition Submitted to the Minnesota Department of Transportation Submitted by Constance Arzigian Mississippi Valley Archaeology Center at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse July 2008 MINNESOTA STATEWIDE MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION FORM FOR THE WOODLAND TRADITION FINAL Mn/DOT Agreement No. 89964 MVAC Report No. 735 Authorized and Sponsored by: Minnesota Department of Transportation Submitted by Mississippi Valley Archaeology Center at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse 1725 State Street La Crosse WI 54601 Principal Investigator and Report Author Constance Arzigian July 2008 NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. Aug. 2002) (Expires 1-31-2009) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. __X_ New Submission ____ Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Woodland Tradition in Minnesota B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) The Brainerd Complex: Early Woodland in Central and Northern Minnesota, 1000 B.C.–A.D. 400 The Southeast Minnesota Early Woodland Complex, 500–200 B.C. The Havana-Related Complex: Middle Woodland in Central and Eastern Minnesota, 200 B.C.–A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossing Boundaries for the Border Lakes Region
    Wilderness News FROM THE QUETICO SUPERIOR FOUNDATION FALL 2008 quetico superior country The Quetico Superior Foundation, established in 1946, encourages and supports the protection of the ecological, cultural and historical resources of the Quetico Superior region. Near Tettegouche State Park. Photo by Jim Gindorff. Crossing Boundaries for the “The loss of silence in our lives is a great tragedy of our civilization. Canoeing is one of the finest ministries that can Border Lakes Region happen.” By Charlie Mahler, Wilderness News Contributor – Reverend Paul Monson, Board Member In an era of increasing partnership “It’s not that there aren’t other collaboratives that of the Listening Point Foundation and a in the Quetico Superior region, the are interested in similar types of objectives,” he strong believer in the restorative value of said. “I think one of the things that makes this col- camping and canoeing. Border Lakes Partnership provides laborative unique is that the interested parties got July, 24 1937 - October 28, 2008 a model for what cooperative together because of a sense of common purpose. In efforts can accomplish. other cases, some of these more collaborative groups that have worked across agencies have got- The collaborative has been at work since 2003 ten together because there’s been conflict or issues developing cross-boundary strategies for managing they needed to resolve.” forest resources, reducing hazardous forest fuels, and conserving biodiversity in the region. Members Shinneman, himself, embodies the shared nature like the U.S. Forest Service Northern Research of the Border Lakes Partnership’s efforts. “My posi- Station, Superior National Forest, Minnesota tion is really a unique one,” he said.
    [Show full text]