Pneuma 27,2_f5_273-296III 11/8/05 6:26 PM Page 273

PNEUMA: The Journal of the Society for Pentecostal Studies, Volume 27, No. 2, Fall 2005

The Paraclete and Prophecy in the Johannine Community

Crinisor Stefan

Introduction

A quick survey of all the studies on the five Paraclete1 sayings reveals that scholars dedicate just limited space to the treatment of the fifth say- ing in John 16:13–14. Although they all agree that this is a distinctive saying, they tend to see it as a restatement or an explanation of the sec- ond Paraclete saying in :26, where the reader is told that the Paraclete will teach all things and will bring to remembrance all things taught his disciples. In my view this interpretation fails to explain fully the role of the Paraclete in the believer’s life, because it overlooks a very important function of the Spirit in the Fourth , namely, the prophetic function. Although the idea of the Paraclete’s teaching was already introduced in 14:26, the reader of the Gospel should note that in John 16:12–15, the teaching of the Paraclete is no longer oriented toward the past ÍpomnÆsei, but towards the future (ka‹tå §rxÒmena énaggele›Ím›n). The Evangelist points out that the Paraclete is not only an interpreter of the “old revela- tion” (the words of the earthly Jesus) but that he is also instrumental in disclosing the “things to come.” Using as the point of departure the statement in John 16:13, where we are told that the Spirit-Paraclete reveals the “things to come,” I will argue in this essay that the Paraclete not only interprets the “old revelation” (the words of the earthly Jesus), but also brings “new revelation,” predicting future events related to the life of the community and individuals, and providing direction for the community in its witnessing ministry. This is one of the major points of departure between me and the majority of scholars, who, in my opinion, overlook the fact that the needs to be read primarily against the Jewish religious background, a background that emphasizes the predictive role of the Spirit-inspired prophecy.

1 For a survey of the scholarly work on the five Paraclete sayings including a possi- ble background for the term Paraclete see Gary M. Burge, The Anointed Community: The in the Johannine Tradition (Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1987), 3–42.

© 2005 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden pp. 273–296 Pneuma 27,2_f5_273-296III 11/8/05 6:26 PM Page 274

PNEUMA: The Journal of the Society for Pentecostal Studies, Volume 27, No. 2, Fall 2005

It is my contention that in the Johannine community all believers were potential prophets. They all had the same ; the same Spirit that rested (m°nein) on Jesus, the Prophet, remained in them as well.2 It seems that for John,3 prophecy was too important to be left to the prophets alone. Usually scholars have been content to mention briefly that there may have been some prophets in the Johannine community, but they have not attempted to point out who these prophets were, what they did, and how they did it. The Johannine community was a charismatic community in which the exalted Christ was still speaking through the Paraclete to the believers. The Gospel itself may be the product of both the oral tradition and of the prophetic utterances delivered by the Evangelist or some prophets in the community. According to John, the Paraclete will not only continue Jesus’ revela- tory work but will complete it. This seemingly bold affirmation needs fur- ther clarification, however. Therefore in this essay I will attempt to explain the way in which the Paraclete continues and completes the revelation brought by Jesus, and how it relates to prophecy. In order to do so, I will examine the work of the Paraclete under three different headings: (1) the Paraclete and prophecy, (2) the Paraclete and “the things to come,” and (3) the Paraclete and the prophets.

The Paraclete and Prophecy

There is a growing number of Johannine scholars who point to the significance of prophecy in the Johannine community.4 Although not all of them assign the same importance to it, many acknowledge that the ele- ment of prophecy is one of the keys, if not the key, to understanding the community in which the Gospel was written.5 Thus David Aune says that

2 This does not mean that Jesus’ relationship to the Spirit is similar to the believer’s relationship to the Spirit. Whereas in this essay I will argue that John presents Jesus as the Prophet, I do not imply that he prophesied due to his anointing with the Spirit. 3 In this essay the designation of John as the author of the Fourth Gospel does not necessarily refer to John the Apostle, neither does it imply that a male wrote the Gospel. Henceforth the use of the masculine pronouns when referring to the author occur only as a consequence of using the name John as the writer of the narrative. 4 See, for example, Otto Betz, Der Paraklet (Leiden: Brill, 1963); George Johnston, The Spirit-Paraclete in the Gospel of John (Cambridge: University Press, 1975), 127–48; Ernst Käsemann, The Testament of Jesus, trans. Gerhard Krodel (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1968), 39; Joachim Jeremias, Theology, vol. 2, The Proclamation of Jesus, trans. J. Bowden (New York: Scribner’s, 1971), 2. 5 See, for example, Franz Mussner, The Historical Jesus in the Gospel of John, trans. W. J. O’Hara (New York: Herder and Herder, 1967), 66.

274