DOCSLIB.ORG

Consumer Conscience

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Consumer Conscience ITC CONSUMER CONSCIENCE CONSUMER CONSCIENCE CONSUMER HOW ENVIRONMENT AND ETHICS ARE INFLUENCING EXPORTS USD 50 ISBN 978-92-9137-379-6 EXPORT IMPACT FOR GOOD United Nations Sales No. E.09.III.T.8 © International Trade Centre 2009 The International Trade Centre (ITC) is the joint agency of the World Trade Organization and the United Nations. ITC publications can be purchased from ITC’s website: www.intracen.org/eshop and from: Street address: ITC, 54-56, rue de Montbrillant, ᮣ United Nations Sales & Marketing Section 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Palais des Nations CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland Postal address: ITC, Fax: +41 22 917 00 27 Palais des Nations, E-mail: [email protected] (for orders from Africa, Europe and the Middle East) 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland and Telephone: +41-22 730 0111 ᮣ United Nations Sales & Marketing Section Room DC2-853, 2 United Nations Plaza Fax: +41-22 733 4439 New York, N.Y. 10017, USA (for orders from America, Asia and the Far East) Fax: 1/212 963 3489 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.intracen.org Orders can be placed with your bookseller or sent directly to one of the above addresses. CONSUMER CONSCIENCE HOW ENVIRONMENT AND ETHICS ARE INFLUENCING EXPORTS Geneva 2009 ii ABSTRACT FOR TRADE INFORMATION SERVICES 2009 F-06.16 CON INTERNATIONAL TRADE CENTRE (ITC) Consumer Conscience: How Environment and Ethics are Influencing Exports. Geneva: ITC, 2009. ix, 60 p. Report reflecting views, examples and suggestions on how exporters can benefit from the emerging opportunities in the area of ethical trade, as expressed by the participants of the ITC World Export Development Forum, “Consumers, Ethics and Environment”, Montreux, Switzerland, 8-11 October, 2008 discusses the concept of “ethical consumerism” across the entire supply chain; innovation in meeting consumer demand for products created by ethically and environmentally acceptable means; public and private standards; sustainability-related finance, social entrepreneurship, and transparency via the Internet; global partnership in the service of poverty reduction and development, and the role of women in business; outlines ways in which governments and trade support institutions can help ethical traders. Descriptors: Corporate Social Responsibility, Fair Trade, Competitiveness, Export Strategy. English ITC, Palais des Nations, 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Trade Centre concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Mention of firm names, commercial products and brand names does not imply the endorsement of ITC. Cover: Illustration by Giles Kershaw © International Trade Centre 2009 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from the International Trade Centre. ITC/P239.E/ES/09-XI ISBN 978-92-9137-379-6 United Nations Sales No. E.09.III.T.8 Foreword Globalization is changing the concerns of consumers. While shoppers still pay attention to quality and price, more than ever they are concerned about the environmental and social impacts of their purchases. They want to know that people involved throughout the process are being paid fairly, that the products are sourced in an environmentally sound manner, and that the supply chain is handled ethically. Because of this change in attitude, fair trade and ethical markets are growing at a faster pace than regular markets. But how can entrepreneurs in developing countries break into these markets? That was the overriding question at the three-day World Export Development Forum of 2008, where over 250 experts debated a wide range of issues related to consumer conscience. To small producers, ethical commerce offers a stable market; for large distributors, it offers differentiation. But there are challenges that are not easily overcome: trade institutions are not always clear about what kind of support to offer and how; and applying international and private standards can be costly for producers in developing countries. For ethical trade to be sustainable, experts stated that producers are advised to focus on innovation, and not only to seek out low-cost solutions. More support is needed for sustainability-related finance, scaling up social entrepreneurship and transparency via the Internet. Among all of the topics discussed, there was one bottom line: how to grow ethical trade as a tool to raise the standard of living for everyone involved. To those of you who joined us at the Forum, ITC thanks you for your participation. Gatherings like this are invaluable in helping ITC to advise its clients better. For those of you unable to join us, ITC hopes that this book helps deepen your understanding of the issues and offers advice that you can put into practice. Patricia R. Francis Executive Director International Trade Centre iv v Acknowledgements This book is based on ITC's World Export Development Forum 2008, developed and coordinated by Anton J. Said. Communications management was conducted by Natalie Domeisen. The content for this edition is based on reports conducted during the event by the session writers, with contributions from ITC staff who served as session managers. The coordinator and chief editor for this book was Peter Hulm. Owen Skae and Anton J. Said were co-editors. Writers of various chapters were: Robert Crawford, Robert Evans, Christian Helmers, Peter Hulm, Sophie Krantz, Leonor von Limburg, Dianna Rienstra, Owen Skae, Richard Waddington and Julie Wolf. Layout services were provided by Michel Favre. vi Contents Foreword iii Acknowledgements v Chapter 1 Ethical trade – the hope and the reality 1 Fair trade = unfair competition? 1 North vs South, or Producer vs Consumer? 2 Producer conscience and appropriate technologies 2 Does it guarantee a return on investment? 3 Standards as a non-tariff barrier 4 Navigating through the thickets of Fair Trade labels and fictions 5 Consumer confusion, retail therapy for strapped economies 5 Consumer conscience in a time of crisis 7 The elephant in the garden or the proverbial ostrich 7 Beyond crisis, beyond logos 8 Chapter 2 The value of the ethical consumer 9 Towards a new consumerism 9 Values drive purchasing decisions 10 The triple bottom line 11 A public licence to operate 11 Confronting the new consumer power 11 Market size matters – the numbers tell the story 12 Hype or potential? 13 The norm rather than exception 14 Ethical trade market: Safer in troubled times 14 Deep and enduring change 15 Transparency is the new mantra 15 Ethical companies are more competitive 15 What is fair? And for whom? 16 Fairness vs consumer demands 16 Successful stories sell 17 viii Chapter 3 Creating the value: Innovation is non-negotiable 19 The sources of innovation 19 The mother of innovation 20 Overcoming market constraints 22 Government role 22 Financial institutions 22 Partnership and linkages are paramount 23 Take advantage of serendipity in the market 24 Branding for consumers with a conscience 24 Stiff competition from multinationals 25 Building trust 25 Tales to tell the world 26 Chapter 4 Raising the value 27 Barriers and costs 27 Why standards and labelling schemes? 27 A double-edged sword 28 Private labels – clarity or confusion? 29 Challenges for developing countries 29 Benefits for developing countries 30 Convincing consumers 31 Information, participation and coherence 32 Partnering for value 33 Scope for action 34 Chapter 5 Delivering the value 35 Paying the bill 35 Microfinance and retail support 36 Social entrepreneurs growing 37 Bureaucratic barriers in the South 38 Women at the core of social entrepreneurship 39 E-burdens and e-transparency 39 Trust me into show me 40 Transparency based on needs 41 Chapter 6 Sustaining and distributing value 43 Major challenge in helping producers 44 Profit and non-profit working side by side 44 Ethical trade: Does it come at a development cost? 46 Vigorous defence, optimistic outlook 47 Robust demand 47 True test of success: Extinction 47 Does one size fit all? 48 ix North-South company partnerships 48 Role of women in business 49 What consumers want and how to give it to them 49 Embracing consumer conscience: A strategic approach 50 A national vision 50 Populist backlash 51 Policy support 51 Ten principles for export development 52 Chapter 7 Learning lessons, taking action on ethical trade 53 What can help ethical traders 54 The fair and the free 54 Hitting the moving target 55 Consumers buy the story 55 Doubting voices in the supermarket 56 Consumer conscience in the business model 56 Consumers need leadership 57 Confusion or clarity? 58 Fair trade’s moral dilemmas 58 Trust and distance 59 Supporting ethical trade 59 The role of international bodies 60 Figures 1. Recognition of the Fairtrade Mark 1999-2008 13 Box 1. Caught in the supermarket wars 3 2. Millennium Development Goals 6 3. Grass jewellery and chocolate bars 17 4. The food miles debate: Hearing both sides 18 5. Good corporate citizens 26 6. India’s Spice Route 33 7. Marketing reform and brand-sharing 40 8. Moving artisans up the value chain 45 Chapter 1 Ethical trade – the hope and the reality "The shift to sustainable consumerism provides many opportunities for developing nations – and also many challenges. Export impact for good is ITC's mission. We are in the business of trying to help people get into a global trading system and the global economy so that they can prosper." Patricia Francis, Executive Director, International Trade Centre From a strictly economic point of view, ethical trade is an aspiration, not a condition of international commerce.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ethical Consumerism November 2015
    UK Data Archive Study Number 7787 - Twenty-First Century Evangelicals Ethical Consumerism November 2015 Welcome Thank you for taking part in the 21st Century Evangelicals online research. These surveys are designed by the Evangelical Alliance. The findings will appear in IDEA magazine and on our website. This quarter's survey is about the decisions we all make as consumers. For example, spotting a good bargain, choosing fairtrade products, avoiding environmentally damaging practices and investing money in businesses without asking too many questions about how it might be used. All answers are anonymous. If you'd really rather not answer a particular question you can always leave it blank. People vary, but we estimate the survey shouldn’t take longer than about 20 minutes, unless you choose to write a lot in open­ended comment boxes. Page 1 Ethical Consumerism November 2015 About you In every survey we need to ask everyone a few short background questions so that we can easily break down the responses from different groups of people. We apologise if you have completed this for a previous survey – unfortunately we cannot carry over your demographic data. 1. Your gender: (' Male (' Female 2. In which decade were you born? (' 1920s (' 1960s (' 1930s (' 1970s (' 1940s (' 1980s (' 1950s (' 1990s Page 2 Ethical Consumerism November 2015 Are you a Christian? 3. Do you consider yourself to be a committed Christian (i.e. someone who believes in God, tries to follow Jesus, practises your faith, prays and attends church as you are able)? (' Yes (' No (' Unsure 4. Do you consider yourself to be an evangelical Christian? (' Yes (' No (' Unsure Page 3 Ethical Consumerism November 2015 Where do you live? 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016
    Fair Wear Foundation – Annual Report 2016 FAIR WEAR FOUNDATION ANNUAL REPORT 2016 1 / 60 Fair Wear Foundation – Annual Report 2016 CONTENTS Report of the board 4 Preface 5 Introduction to Fair Wear Foundation 6 Organisation and board 7 New and terminated members Fair Wear approach 9 Supply chain approach 11 Strategic Partnership 14 Projects 16 Communications Country overview 20 Country summary 22 Country reports Annual financial statement 2016 36 Balance sheet 31 December 2016 37 Statement of income and expenditure 2016 38 Cashflow statement 2016 39 Accounting principles 40 Notes of the balance sheet December 2016 43 Notes to the statement of income and expenditure 2016 46 Independent auditor’s report Projects and subsidies 51 Donor: Fastenopfer and Max Havelaar Switzerland 52 Donor: Brot für Alle 53 Donor: CNV Internationaal 54 Donor: European Union 56 Donor: Dutch ministry of foreign affairs 60 Donor: RVO-Netherlands enterprise agency 2 / 60 Fair Wear Foundation – Annual Report 2016 REPORT OF THE BOARD 3 / 60 Fair Wear Foundation – Annual Report 2016 PREFACE 2016 was a pivotal year in the movement to improve working conditions in the global garment sector; the debate, although not at the point of consensus, has seen a shift towards progressive action and 2016 saw the creation of many new multi-national initiatives. In the Netherlands, the Dutch government created the Textile Covenant, through collaboration with trade organisations and NGOs. The aim of the Covenant is to improve poor working conditions, prevent child labour and increase wages in textile-producing countries, such as Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and Turkey. Another crucial global instrument developed during 2016 is the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains in the Garment and Footwear Sector, which was launched in early 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Fairtrade Prices Fair? an Analysis of the Distribution of Returns in the Swedish Coffee Market
    WORKING PAPERS IN ECONOMICS No 615 Are Fairtrade Prices Fair? An Analysis of the Distribution of Returns in the Swedish Coffee Market Dick Durevall February 2015 ISSN 1403-2473 (print) ISSN 1403-2465 (online) Department of Economics School of Business, Economics and Law at University of Gothenburg Vasagatan 1, PO Box 640, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden +46 31 786 0000, +46 31 786 1326 (fax) www.handels.gu.se [email protected] Are Fairtrade Prices Fair? An Analysis of the Distribution of Returns in the Swedish Coffee Market Dick Durevall* HUI Research and Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg 23/02/2015 Abstract Consumers pay a premium for Fair Trade coffee, often assuming that it mainly benefits poor coffee farmers. However, several studies report that most of the premium accrues to actors in the consumer countries, such as roasters and retailers. This paper analyses how the returns to Fair Trade are distributed among bean producer countries, roasters and retailers, and Fairtrade Sweden, using scanner data on 185 products from Sweden and information about costs of production. The distribution depends on how much more costly it is to produce Fair Trade coffee compared to conventional coffee, given costs of beans and licences. Assuming the difference is 5 SEK per kg (about USD 0.80), which is on the high side, roasters and retailers get 61%, while producer countries, i.e., coffee farmers, cooperatives, middlemen, exporters and Fairtrade International, get 31%. The rest accrues to Fairtrade Sweden. These estimates are uncertain, but there is there strong evidence that Fair Trade retail prices are higher than the level attributable to the costs of Fair Trade beans and licences.
    [Show full text]
  • GA-2 16, Topic-Free Vs Fair Trade, Final
    Montana Model UN High School Conference General Assembly Second Committee Topic 2: Free Trade vs. Fair Trade with Developing Countries 1 1 October 2016 There are two basic approaches to international trade. The first approach, free trade , is the idea that government intervention and protectionist methods such as tariffs and import controls should be limited, allowing prices to be set by supply and demand and, therefore, to be as low as possible. The second approach, fair trade , is the idea that free market prices fail to provide for worker security in countries where labor is in abundance and wages are often inadequate to support workers’ most basic needs. Fair trade advocates argue that prices should be set to take such situations into account. The emphasis in free trade then, is on low prices, while the emphasis in fair trade is on fair prices. Those in favor of free trade argue that states should take several actions to reduce protectionism. First, states should reduce or eliminate tariffs (also known as customs duties), which are taxes on imports. 2 An example of a tariff is the US tariff on imported steel from China, which was set at 265.79% in March of 2016 to protect the US steel industry from the low prices that were accompanying a large “influx of foreign steel.” 3 Second, reducing protectionism calls for limiting subsidies. Subsidies are the financial assistance paid to support domestic businesses to make them artificially competitive against imports. In the European Union (EU) for example, domestic wheat farmers are being paid $200 per ton of wheat; however, outside of the EU, wheat can be purchased at $150 per ton, showing that EU farmers are being subsidized by $50 per ton.
    [Show full text]
  • Segmenting Consumers' Reasons for and Against Ethical Consumption
    Segmenting Consumers’ Reasons For and Against Ethical Consumption Citation: Burke, P.F., Eckert, C., & Davis, S. (2014). Segmenting consumers’ reasons for and against ethical consumption. European Journal of Marketing, 48(11/12), 2237-2261. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EJM-06-2013-0294 Author Affiliations: University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Australia Corresponding author: Dr Paul F. Burke via email [email protected] 1 Segmenting Consumers’ Reasons For and Against Ethical Consumption Purpose: This paper quantifies the relative importance of reasons used to explain consumers’ selection and rejection of ethical products, accounting for differences in ethical orientations across consumers. Approach: Reviewing previous literature and drawing on in-depth interviews, a taxonomy of reasons for and against ethical purchasing is developed. An online survey incorporating best-worst scaling determines which reasons feature more in shaping ethical consumerism. Cluster analysis and multinomial regression are used to identify and profile segments. Findings: Positively orientated consumers (42% of respondents) purchase ethical products more so because of reasons relating to impact, health, personal relevance, and quality. Negatively orientated consumers (34% of respondents) reject ethical alternatives based on reasons relating to indifference, expense, confusion, and scepticism. A third segment is ambivalent in their behaviour and reasoning; they perceive ethical purchasing to be effective and relevant, but are confused and sceptical under what conditions this can occur. Limitations: Preferences were elicited using an online survey rather than using real market data. Though the task instructions and methods used attempted to minimise social-desirability bias, the experiment might still be subject to its effects. Implications: Competitive positioning strategies can be better designed knowing which barriers to ethical purchasing are more relevant.
    [Show full text]
  • Fair Trade and FWF: Kindred Efforts Working Towards a Common Goal
    Fair Wear Foundation Fair trade and FWF: Kindred efforts working towards a common goal FWF and Fair Trade differ in some significant ways. Yet these differences – combined with shared core values – are what make the two approaches complementary. It is not uncommon for people to ask online and at public events ‘How is Fair Wear Foundation different from Fair Trade?’ or ‘Is FWF the same thing as Fair Trade?’ While it is valuable to recognise the distinctions between these approaches, it is also important to recognise how much they have in common. In fact, it may be consumers’ recognition of the common goal we share at our core – i.e. fair treatment for the people who make the goods we use – that leads them to ask this question. FWF has always had a close working relationship with Fair Trade organisations: fair traders sit on our board and are involved in our multi-stakeholder efforts at the local level. And, as both FWF and Fair Trade mature, we are finding new opportunities to work together. So the response to such questions is: FWF and Fair Trade differ in some significant ways. Yet these differences – combined with shared core values – are what make the two approaches complementary. What FWF and Fair Trade have in common As the names ‘Fair Trade’ and ‘Fair Wear Foundation’ indicate, we have in common a vision of a global market where participants are treated fairly. Fair Trade ensures that small producers get a fair deal for the products they grow (e.g. a small coffee farmer dealing with a large multi-national corporation), while FWF focuses on fairness for workers in the garment industry where downward pressures on prices have been undercutting wages and working conditions for decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring & Compliance
    I N S I G H T 4 Monitoring & Compliance: MSIs employ inadequate methods to detect human rights abuses and uphold standards The Institute for Multi-Stakeholder Initiative Integrity (MSI Integrity) aims to reduce the harms and human rights abuses caused or exacerbated by the private sector. For the past decade, MSI Integrity has investigated whether, when and how multi-stakeholder initiatives protect and promote human rights. The culmination of this research is now available in our report, Not Fit-for-Purpose: The Grand Experiment of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives in Corporate Accountability, Human Rights and Global Governance. The full report contains six insights from experience with, and research into, international standard-setting multi-stakeholder initiatives. It also contains key conclusions from these insights, and perspectives on a way forward for improving the protection of human rights against corporate-related abuses. This is an excerpt of the full report, focusing on Insight 4. The six insights are: Insight 1: Influence — MSIs have been influential as human rights tools, but that influence, along with their credibility, is waning. Insight 2: Stakeholder Participation — MSIs entrench corporate power by failing to include rights holders and by preventing civil society from acting as an agent of change. Insight 3: Standards & Scope — Many MSIs adopt narrow or weak standards that overlook the root causes of abuses or risk creating a misperception that they are being effectively addressed. Insight 4: Monitoring & Compliance — MSIs employ inadequate methods to detect human rights abuses and uphold standards. Insight 5: Remedy — MSIs are not designed to provide rights holders with access to effective remedy.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Consumption As a Reflection of Self-Identity
    Ethical consumption as a reflection of self-identity Hanna Rahikainen Department of Marketing Hanken School of Economics Helsinki 2015 HANKEN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Department of Marketing Type of work: Master’s Thesis Author: Hanna Rahikainen Date: 31.7.2015 Title of thesis: Ethical consumption as a reflection of self-identity Abstract: In recent years, people’s increasing awareness of ethical consumption has become increasingly important for the business environment. Although previous research has shown that consumers are influenced by their ethical concerns, ethical consumption from a consumer perspective lacks understanding. As self-identity is an important concept in explaining how consumers relate to different consumption objects, relating it to ethical consumption is a valuable addition to the existing body of research. As the phenomenon of ethical consumption has been widely studied, but the literature is fragmented covering a wide range of topics such as sustainability and environmental concerns, the theoretical framework of the paper portrays the multifaceted and complex nature of the concepts of ethical consumption and self-identity and the complexities existing in the relationship of consumption and self-identity in general. The present study took a qualitative approach to find out how consumers define what ethical consumption is to them in their own consumption and how self-identity was related to ethical consumption. The informants consisted of eight females between the ages of 25 – 29 living in the capital area of Finland. The results of the study showed an even greater complexity connecting to ethical consumption when researched from a consumer perspective, but indicated clearly the presence of a plurality of identities connected to ethical consumption, portraying it as one of the behavioural modes selected or rejected by an active self.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory of Change 2019 Fair Wear Foundation’S Theory of Change
    Fair Wear Foundation’s Theory of Change 2019 Fair Wear Foundation’s Theory of Change 2019 In 2019, Fair Wear Foundation developed an organisational Theory of Change (ToC), consisting of a diagram which visually represents the ToC and this accompanying narrative. In this narrative, Fair Wear’s vision of success, pathways of change and the different actors of change are discussed. Vision of success Fair Wear’s overall vision of success is a world where workers in the garment industry see their rights to safe, dignified, properly paid employment realised. In working towards this vision, we recognise the need to address the interests of all actors involved, but we place particular emphasis on workers’ rights to decent working conditions. Standards for these decent working conditions are captured in the Fair Wear Code of Labour Practices (CoLP). A gender lens should be applied to each of the standards in the CoLP so as to ensure that any worker can realise their labour rights, regardless of their gender. To reach the overall vision, it is necessary that: Brands continuously improve their internal mechanisms, including purchasing practices to facilitate working conditions according to the CoLP; Brands in cooperation with their suppliers and worker representatives systematically and effectively prevent, mitigate and remediate risks and violations related to the CoLP throughout their supply chains; Relevant stakeholders, including policy makers and regulatory oversight organisations, enable the effective enforcement of the CoLP in the garment sector; Relevant stakeholders engage in meaningful and effective social dialogue. 2 We strongly believe in our multi-stakeholder approach for influencing these necessary sector-wide changes in the garment industry and the enabling environment.
    [Show full text]
  • By Workshop We Mean a Discussion Forum Where Several Participants
    Facing the Challenge: The Temptations and Perils of Placing Volume over Values in the Fair Trade Market Chair and Convenor: Monika Maria Firl, Cooperative Coffees Address: 4542 rue de Marquette Montreal, QC H2J 3Y4 Telephone: 1-514-284-6162 Fax: 1-514-221-3611 E-mail: [email protected] Status: Practitioners (Fair Trade Coffee Importers, Roasters and Promoters) Volume verses Values: This workshop is intended to demystify certain assumptions around the debate on “How to grow the market?” a lively topic now commonplace in many Fair Trade circles. Along with the entrance of increasing numbers of Trans National Corporations (TNCs) without evident social agendas, many critics and practitioners are suddenly thrown into an “either or” discussion around the future directions of Fair Trade. Depending on whom you talk to and which way you look at it, Fair Trade is either “selling out” or “finally hitting the mainstream.” We will examine the strength of economic justice messaging based upon solid values and demonstrative commitment with both producer partners and local consumer networks, and how that has proved to be a more powerful tool for developing a sustainable Fair Trade network than slick marketing and/or large publicity budgets. We will bring together North American Fair Trade pioneers and innovators to share their respective life experiences introducing and developing Fair Trade markets in their respective fields of influence. We will provide a brief presentation by each one of the critical actors along the Fair Trade system: Fair Trade producer representative, Fair Trade financer, Fair Trade certifier, Fair Trade importer and Fair Trade roaster.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethics of Environmentalism for the Individual Consumer Molly Collins
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Honors Theses Student Research 2016 The ethics of environmentalism for the individual consumer Molly Collins Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/honors-theses Part of the Environmental Studies Commons, and the Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Collins, Molly, "The thice s of environmentalism for the individual consumer" (2016). Honors Theses. Paper 970. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Ethics ofEnvironmentalism for the Individual Consumer Molly Collins Honors Thesis Submitted to The Jepson School of Leadership Studies University of Richmond Richmond, VA April 29, 2016 Advisor: Dr. Jessica Flanigan Abstract The Ethics ofEnvironmentalism for the Individual Consumer Molly Collins Committee Members: Dr. Jessica Flanigan, Dr. Terry Price, Dr. Eugene Wu, Dr. Robert Andrejewski Climate change harms the well-being of humans. It is the poor choices of individual consumers that contribute to climate change. I argue that it is immoral to cause harm to others, thus climate change is an ethical dilemma for individual consumers. I begin with a pluralistic discussion of harm, before discussing the duties of individuals to make choices that will mitigate the current harms of climate change and the wrong moral assumptions that individuals make regarding their contribution to climate change. I discuss the principles of ethical consumerism, specifically in housing, food, and transportation. Lastly, I argue that climate change is an enforceable duty on the premise that those who cause or threaten harm are liable for their actions and that individuals are equally as liable for the collective well-being.
    [Show full text]
  • Fair Wear Foundation Believes That Improving Conditions for Apparel Product Location Workers Requires Change at Many Levels
    BRAND PERFORMANCE CHECK Vaude Sport GmbH & Co. KG PUBLICATION DATE: APRIL 2018 this report covers the evaluation period 01-01-2017 to 31-12-2017 ABOUT THE BRAND PERFORMANCE CHECK Fair Wear Foundation believes that improving conditions for apparel product location workers requires change at many levels. Traditional efforts to improve conditions focus primarily on the product location. FWF, however, believes that the management decisions of clothing brands have an enormous influence for good or ill on product location conditions. FWF’s Brand Performance Check is a tool to evaluate and report on the activities of FWF’s member companies. The Checks examine how member company management systems support FWF’s Code of Labour Practices. They evaluate the parts of member company supply chains where clothing is assembled. This is the most labour intensive part of garment supply chains, and where brands can have the most influence over working conditions. In most apparel supply chains, clothing brands do not own product locations, and most product locations work for many different brands. This means that in most cases FWF member companies have influence, but not direct control, over working conditions. As a result, the Brand Performance Checks focus primarily on verifying the efforts of member companies. Outcomes at the product location level are assessed via audits and complaint reports, however the complexity of the supply chains means that even the best efforts of FWF member companies cannot guarantee results. Even if outcomes at the product location level cannot be guaranteed, the importance of good management practices by member companies cannot be understated.
    [Show full text]