DOCSLIB.ORG

Santa Clara River Watershed Section WCVC IRWM Plan Update 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Santa Clara River Watershed Section WCVC IRWM Plan Update 2014 WCVC IRWM Plan Update 2014 - Santa Clara River Watershed Section Santa Clara River Watershed Section WCVC IRWM Plan Update 2014 1 WCVC IRWM Plan Update 2014 - Santa Clara River Watershed Section Santa Clara River Watershed Section Section 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Accomplishments since 2007 Section 2.0 Watershed Description 2.1 Watershed Internal Boundaries 2.2 Entities Whose Activities Impact Water Management 2.2.1 Local Agencies with Statutory Authority over Water Supply and Management 2.2.2 Other Potential Participants 2.3 Watersheds and water systems 2.3.1 Major Water Related Infrastructure 2.3.2 Flood Management Infrastructure 2.4 Climate Change Scenarios and Impacts on Water Supply and Demand 2.4.1 State Water Plan Update (2009) Water Demand and Climate Change Scenarios 2.4.2 Watershed‐Specific Climate Change Projections and Impacts 2.5 Water Supply and Demand 2.5.1 Urban Water Supply and Demand Projections 2.5.2 Agricultural Water Demand 2 WCVC IRWM Plan Update 2014 - Santa Clara River Watershed Section 2.6 Water Quality 2.6.1 Regulatory Requirements for Water Quality 2.6.2 Current Water Quality Conditions 2.7 Social and Cultural Composition of the Watershed 2.7.1 Disadvantaged Communities 2.8 Issues and Needs in the Watershed Section 3.0 Governance and Stakeholder Involvement in Santa Clara River Watershed 3.1 Santa Clara River Watershed Committee 3.2 Coordination with Upper Santa Clara River Watershed IRWM Region Section 4.0 IRWM Plan Goals; Objectives in Santa Clara River Watershed 4.1 Background – Mission and Vision 4.2 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Goals and Watershed Objectives Section 5.0 Resource Management Strategies Selected for Implementation in Santa Clara River Watershed 5.1 Background 5.2 Resource Management Strategies Implemented in Santa Clara River Watershed Section 6.0 Types of Implementation Projects for Implementation in Santa Clara River Watershed 6.1 Proposed and Recent Projects 6.2 High Priority Types of Projects and Programs 3 WCVC IRWM Plan Update 2014 - Santa Clara River Watershed Section Section 7.0 Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Section 8.0 Relevant References, Studies, Plans and Reports APPENDICES A. Groundwater Flow Model Update B. Salt and Nutrient Management Plan C. Impaired Water Bodies – Section 303 (d) 4 WCVC IRWM Plan Update 2014 - Santa Clara River Watershed Section WCVC IRWM Plan Update 2013 Santa Clara River Watershed Section 1.0 INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the Santa Clara River Watershed Section of the Integrated Regional Watershed Management Plan (IRWMP) Update is to provide comprehensive watershed- specific information in a single document to facilitate IRWM planning and project development. The Watershed Section is meant to provide a summary of detailed information available and provide a link and reference to other sources of additional in- depth information if desired. References to these sources are provided within the text and at the end in the References Section. 1.1 IRWM Accomplishments Since its adoption in 2006, the IRWM program has successfully helped facilitate the planning and funding of numerous projects that improve water management in the watershed and help achieve IRWM goals. Table 1 provides a list of projects and programs implemented since 2007 in the Santa Clara River Watershed as well as the IRWM goals that they help achieve. 5 WCVC IRWM Plan Update 2014 - Santa Clara River Watershed Section Table 1. IRWM Projects and Programs Successfully Implemented in the Watershed Since 2007 Project Title Implementing Brief Description Estimated Completion Major Sources of Funding IRWM Entity or Lead Date Goals Agency or Addressed* Partners By Number Project involves innovative Low Prop 84 grant-funding, County Ventura County Impact Design (LID) to reduce Project completion Ventura County and Government and Ventura parking lot runoff volumes, pollutant anticipated in April of Watershed Protection Center Parking County loads, and recharge groundwater 2016 District local match funding Lot Green Watershed through system that infiltrates runoff Streets Urban Protection flows including irrigation water from Retrofit Project District adjacent landscape areas into the underlying soils. The project will 1 through 6 provide stormwater pollution prevention outreach and education opportunities due to the County Government Center parking lot’s high visitation frequency and visibility. CalRecycle, County of 2, 3, 4, & 6 Piru Dump Ventura County The Piru Dump is a closed burn dump Project completed in Ventura and Watershed Bank Watershed adjacent to the Santa Clara River. The March of 2011 Protection District Funding Stabilization Protection bank adjacent to the Santa Clara Project District, Ventura River was eroded in 2004-2005 County winter storms. The Piru Dump Bank Engineering Stabilization Project included Services reconsolidation of waste that had been Department, and washed into the river and building an County engineered bank to prevent future Executive erosion, protecting the river from Office future burn waste exposure. Salt and Nutrient Management Plan Ventura County (SNMP) is being developed for the Plan completion Proposition 84 Planning 6 WCVC IRWM Plan Update 2014 - Santa Clara River Watershed Section Table 1. IRWM Projects and Programs Successfully Implemented in the Watershed Since 2007 Project Title Implementing Brief Description Estimated Completion Major Sources of Funding IRWM Entity or Lead Date Goals Agency or Addressed* Partners By Number Salt and Watershed Lower Santa Clara River groundwater scheduled for Grant, and Watershed Nutrient Protection basins [Fillmore, Mound, Piru, Santa December of 2014 Protection District and Management District, County Paula and Oxnard Forebay]. The participating entities (ie. Plan for Lower of Ventura objective of the SNMP is to manage Cities of Fillmore, Santa Santa Clara Waterworks salts and nutrients from all sources on Paula, and Ventura and River District No. 16, a basin-wide or watershed-wide basis County Waterworks Watershed United Water in a manner that ensures attainment of District No. 16) local match 1, 2, 4, 5 & Conservation water quality objectives and funding 6 District, Farm protection of beneficial uses Bureau of Ventura County, and cities of Fillmore, Santa Paula and Ventura Feasibility Study being performed in Study components: United States Army Corps order to develop technical data Hydrology modeling of Engineers, Los Angeles Santa Clara United States required to identify and understand completed in County Flood Control River Army Corps of the flood protection and water November of 2009, District and Ventura Watershed Engineers, Los resource challenges and opportunities Geomorphology County Watershed Feasibility Angeles County present in the SCR watershed. The completed in May of Protection District Funding Study – Flood Control feasibility study is expected to 2011, Flood mapping in 2, 3, 4 & 6 Modeling District and identify project opportunities with May of 2012, and Efforts Ventura County justified Federal interest that can then Sediment Transport Watershed be further developed with more completion anticipated Protect ion detailed studies that lead to Federally in 2015 District funded construction projects Expanding To complete a United States Bureau United States Bureau of 1 7 WCVC IRWM Plan Update 2014 - Santa Clara River Watershed Section Table 1. IRWM Projects and Programs Successfully Implemented in the Watershed Since 2007 Project Title Implementing Brief Description Estimated Completion Major Sources of Funding IRWM Entity or Lead Date Goals Agency or Addressed* Partners By Number Recycled Water City of Ventura of Reclamation Title XVI Water March 2014 Reclamation Title XVI Delivery Reclamation and Reuse Program Grant & SWRCB Water Project feasibility study for the proposed Recycling Grant Feasibility Expanding Recycled Water Delivery Study Project Phase 2 Santa City of Ventura Evaluated a variety of opportunities City of Ventura 1, 4 & 5 Clara River and for diverting discharge to the SCR March 2013 Estuary Special Participating Estuary for the purposes of recycling Studies Agencies in the the water and benefitting the local Santa Clara communities’ water supply, including River Watershed the creation of wetlands. Fillmore Construction of new, tertiary Completed in 2011 Proposition 50 and local Integrated City of Fillmore treatment level wastewater treatment funding 1 through 6 Recycled Water plant and wetlands and Wetlands Project American Recovery and Piru Ventura County Completed in 2011 Reinvestment Act of 2009 - Wastewater Waterworks ARRA Treatment Plant District No.16 Piru Ventura County Upgrade to tertiary treatment to allow Proposition 84 and local Wastewater Waterworks for recycled water use To be completed in funding 1, 2, 4, and Treatment Plant District No.16 2015 6 Tertiary Upgrade Santa Paula Santa Paula Construction of new tertiary treatment Complete Public/Private Water Water, Perc level wastewater treatment plant Partnership 1, 2, 4, and Recycling Water and 6 Facility Alinda 8 WCVC IRWM Plan Update 2014 - Santa Clara River Watershed Section Table 1. IRWM Projects and Programs Successfully Implemented in the Watershed Since 2007 Project Title Implementing Brief Description Estimated Completion Major Sources of Funding IRWM Entity or Lead Date Goals Agency or Addressed* Partners By Number The Nature Conservancy is implementing the Natural Floodplain Proposition 84 and local Natural The Nature Protection Program to preserve a funding 1 through 6 Floodplain Conservancy
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Revised Section 4.6 Biological Resources Draft Environmental
    Revised Section 4.6 Biological Resources Draft Environmental Impact Report SCH No. 2002091081 Prepared for: City of Santa Clarita Department of Planning & Building Services 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 302 Santa Clarita, California 91355 Prepared by: Impact Sciences, Inc. 30343 Canwood Street, Suite 210 Agoura Hills, California 91301 March 2004 Revised Section 4.6 Biological Resources Draft Environmental Impact Report SCH No. 2002091081 Prepared for: City of Santa Clarita Department of Planning & Building Services 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 302 Santa Clarita, California 91355 Prepared by: Impact Sciences, Inc. 30343 Canwood Street, Suite 210 Agoura Hills, California 91301 March 2004 Table of Contents Volume I: Environmental Impact Report Section Page Introduction....................................................................................................................I-1 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................ES-1 1.0 Project Description....................................................................................................... 1.0-1 2.0 Environmental and Regulatory Setting......................................................................... 2.0-1 3.0 Cumulative Impact Analysis Methodology .................................................................. 3.0-1 4.0 Environmental Impact Analyses................................................................................... 4.0-1 4.1 Geotechnical Hazards..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report
    16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report Jingfen Sheng John P. Wilson Acknowledgements: Financial support for this work was provided by the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy and the County of Los Angeles, as part of the “Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California” Project. The authors thank Jennifer Wolch for her comments and edits on this report. The authors would also like to thank Frank Simpson for his input on this report. Prepared for: San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy 900 South Fremont Avenue, Alhambra, California 91802-1460 Photography: Cover, left to right: Arroyo Simi within the city of Moorpark (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng); eastern Calleguas Creek Watershed tributaries, classifi ed by Strahler stream order (Jingfen Sheng); Morris Dam (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng). All in-text photos are credited to Jaime Sayre/ Jingfen Sheng, with the exceptions of Photo 4.6 (http://www.you-are- here.com/location/la_river.html) and Photo 4.7 (digital-library.csun.edu/ cdm4/browse.php?...). Preferred Citation: Sheng, J. and Wilson, J.P. 2008. The Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California. 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report. University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory and Center for Sustainable Cities, Los Angeles, California. This report was printed on recycled paper. The mission of the Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California is to offer a guide to habitat conservation, watershed health and recreational open space for the Los Angeles metropolitan region. The Plan will also provide decision support tools to nurture a living green matrix for southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • 4001 Mission Oaks Blvd, Camarillo, CA 93012 Haider Alawami – City Of
    MINUTES EDC-VC BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING March 19, 2020 4001 Mission Oaks Blvd, Camarillo, CA 93012 Location: Attendance: Haider Alawami – City of Thousand Oaks, Liaison, ED Managers Roundtable Dee Dee Cavanaugh – City of Simi Valley Gary Cushing – Chambers of Commerce Alliance Nan Drake, Chair – E.J. Harrison Industries Bob Engler – City of Thousand Oaks Amy Fonzo – California Resources Corporation Cheryl Heitmann – City of Ventura Bob Huber – County of Ventura Mary Jarvis – Kaiser Permanente Nina Kobasyashi – Mechanics Bank Jey Lacey – Southern California Edison Kelly Long, Vice Chair – County of Ventura Chris Meissner – Meissner Filtration Products Roseann Mikos – City of Moorpark Jim Scanlon – Arthur J. Gallagher and Co Sandy Smith – VCEDA Andy Sobel – City of Santa Paula Sim Tang Paradis – City National Bank Ysabel Trinidad – California State University Channel Islands Brian Tucker – Ventura County West Peter Zierhut, Secretary/Treasurer – Haas Automation Absent: Gerhard Apfelthaler– California Lutheran University Will Berg – City of Port Hueneme Vance Brahosky – NSWC Port Hueneme Division (Liaison) Kristin Decas – Port of Hueneme/Oxnard Harbor District Skyler Ditchfield– Geolinks Henry Dubroff – Pacific Coast Business Times Harold Edwards – Limoneira Company Greg Gillespie – Ventura County Community College District Anthony Goff – Calleguas Municipal Water District (Liaison) Manuel Minjares – City of Fillmore Will Mitchell – Strata Solar Development Shawn Mulchay – City of Camarillo Carmen Ramirez – City of Oxnard Alex Schneider – The Trade Desk Tony Skinner – IBEW Local #952 Trace Stevenson – AeroVironment, Inc. William Weirick – City of Ojai Legal Counsel: Nancy Kierstyn Schreiner, Law Offices of Nancy Kierstyn Schreiner Staff: Marvin Boateng, Loan Officer Ray Bowman, EDC SBDC Director Shalene Hayman, Controller Kelly Noble, Office Manager Bruce Stenslie, President/CEO Guests: None Call to Order: Chair Nan Drake called the meeting to order at 3:38 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Source, Movement, and Age of Ground Water in a Coastal California Aquifer
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Source, Movement, and Age of Ground Water in a u s Coastal California Aquifer G s This report is a summary ofisotopic studies EXPLANATION of ground-water source, movement, and age in Santa Clara-Calleguas Ground-water aquifers underlying the Santa Clara- ground-water basin recharge ponds Calleguas basin, Ventura County, California. © Piru It is part of a series summarizing the results of © Saticoy the U.S. Geological Survey's Southern Califor­ © El Rio nia Regional Aquifer-System Analysis (RASA) study of a southern California coastal ground- water basin. The geologic setting and hydro- logic processes described in this report are similar to those in other coastal basins in southern California. Introduction Understanding the contribution of recharge from different sources is important to the management of ground-water supply in coastal aquifers in California especially where water-supply or water-quality problems have developed as a result of ground-water pumping. In areas where water levels have changed greatly as a result of pumping and no longer reflect predevelopment conditions, an analysis of isotopic data can provide informa­ Figure 1. Santa Clara-Calleguas Hydrologic Unit. tion about the source, movement, and age of ground water that is not readily obtained from a more traditional analysis of ground-water data This information can be used to develop River where ground water discharges at land face water from Piru Creek near Piru and the management strategies that incorporate the surface. In recent years, perennial flow has Santa Clara River near Saticoy and El Rio (fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Quality in the Santa Clara River Valley, California
    U.S. Geological Survey and the California State Water Resources Control Board Groundwater Quality in the Santa Clara River Valley, California Groundwater provides more than 40 percent of California’s drinking water. To protect this vital resource, the State of California has created the Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment (GAMA) Program. The Priority Basin Project of the GAMA Program provides a comprehensive assess- ment of the State’s groundwater quality and increases public access to groundwater-quality information. The Santa Clara River Valley is one of the study units being evaluated. The Santa Clara River Valley Study Unit Overview of Water Quality The Santa Clara River Valley (SCRV) study unit is located in Los Angeles and Inorganic Organic Ventura Counties, California, and is bounded by the Santa Monica, San Gabriel, Topatopa, constituents constituents and Santa Ynez Mountains, and the Pacific Ocean. The 460-square-mile study unit includes eight groundwater basins: Ojai Valley, Upper Ojai Valley, Ventura River Valley, Santa Clara 21 River Valley, Pleasant Valley, Arroyo Santa Rosa Valley, Las Posas Valley, and Simi Valley 5 Inorganics (California Department of Water Resources, 2003; Montrella and Belitz, 2009). The SCRV 49 30 study unit has hot, dry summers and cool, moist winters. Average annual rainfall ranges 95 from 12 to 28 inches. The study unit is drained by the Ventura and Santa Clara Rivers, and Calleguas Creek. The primary aquifer system in the Ventura River Valley, Ojai Valley, Upper Ojai CONSTITUENT CONCENTRATIONS Valley, and Simi Valley basins is largely unconfined alluvium. The primary aquifer sys- High Moderate Low or not detected tem in the remaining groundwater basins mainly consists of unconfined sands and gravels Values are a percentage of the area of the primary aquifer in the upper portion and system with concentrations in the three specified categories.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern California Wind Event a WES
    Southern California Wind Event ­ A WES Case Study 9­10 February 2002 BACKGROUND: Strong offshore winds pose a significant threat to Southern Californians. These events occur on a fairly regular basis resulting in the usual downed trees and power lines, roof and sign damage, overturned 18­wheelers, extreme fire weather conditions, and, rarely, a fatality– usually due to someone coming in contact with downed power lines. Two types of high wind producing offshore wind events that have been particularly well documented are the Santa Ana Winds of Southern California and the Sundowner Winds of Santa Barbara. In 1995, Ivory Small [SOO SGX] authored NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS WR­230 titled Santa Ana Winds and the Fire Outbreak of Fall 1993. In his memo, Ivory discussed several conceptual models regarding the nature of Santa Ana winds, favored synoptic and mesoscale patterns associated with Santa Ana wind events, and forecasting techniques used by local forecasters at the time. In 1996, Gary Ryan [DAPM at LOX] authored NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS WR­240, titled Downslope Winds of Santa Barbara, California, which described the strong Sundowner Winds that occur commonly below the passes and canyons of the Santa Ynez Mountains. Gary also discussed the synoptic patterns that favored Sundowners, some forecasting rules of thumb, and gave a brief history of significant Sundowner events. Finally, in January 2000, a team of researchers at the National Weather Service Office in Oxnard [LOX], headed by Gary Ryan and Dave Bruno [Lead Forecaster], authored a second NOAA Tech Memo, NWS WR­261, titled Climate of Los Angeles, California.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Southeastern Ventura Basin Los Angeles County California
    Geology of Southeastern Ventura Basin Los Angeles County California By E. L. WINTERER and D. L. DURHAM SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 334-H A study of the stratigraphy, structure, and occurrence of oil in the late Cenozoic Ventura basin UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEW ART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ____________________________________________ 275 Stratigraphy Continued Introduction.______________________________________ 276 Tertiary system Continued Purpose and scope.------_______________________ 276 Pliocene series..._________------__---__----- 308 Fieldwork __ __________________________________ 276 Pico formation.____________-_----_-_-_- 308 Acknowledgments. _ _----_-_-.________________- 276 Stratigraphy and lithology___________ 309 Geography. _________________________________________ 278 Newhall-Potrero area__________ 309 Climate- ______--_-__-_-__-_--_-_____________-_ 278 Newhsll-Potrero oil field to East Vegetation.____________________________________ 278 Canyon____________________ 310 Santa Clara River______________________________ 278 Mouth of East Canyon to San Fer­ Relief. __.._.._._._________---_-_--_________ 278 nando Pass__-----_-_-------- 311 Human activities----_------__--________________ 278 San Fernando Pass to San Gabriel Physiography_ _____________________________________ 278 fault..____-__-__-_------.--_ 311 Structural and lithologic control of drainage______ 279 Santa Clara River to Del Valle River terraces and old erosion surfaces-__ _________ 279 fault.___----.--_-_---------_ 312 Present erosion cycle.___________________________ 281 Del Valle fault to Holser fault__ 312 Landslides- ___--.-------_-_--___________________ 281 Area north of Holser fault- ______ 312 Stratigraphy.______________________________________ 281 Fossils..
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Santa Clarita Valley Water Report Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency Los Angeles County Waterworks District 36
    2019 Santa Clarita Valley Water Report Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency Los Angeles County Waterworks District 36 July 2020 2019 Santa Clarita Valley Water Report prepared for: Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency Los Angeles County Waterworks District 36 July 2020 prepared by: William L. Halligan, PG Lisa Lavagnino, GIT Senior Principal Hydrogeologist Project Geologist Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................... ES-1 ES.1 2019 Water Requirements & Supplies .................................................................... ES-1 ES.2 Groundwater........................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.3 I mported Water Supplies ........................................................................................ ES-3 ES.4 2020 Watter Supply Outlook .................................................................................. ES-4 ES.5 Water Supply Conservation .................................................................................... ES-5 1 - Introduction.......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Purpose and Scope of the Report ..................................................................................3 1.3 Santa Clarita Valley Water Divisions and LACWD 36 .....................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • 4-004.02 Santa Clara River Valley -Oxnard
    4-004.02 SANTA CLARA RIVER VALLEY - OXNARD Basin Boundaries Summary The Oxnard subbasin underlies the City of Oxnard and the Point Mugu Naval Air Station in southern Ventura County. The northern boundary of the subbasin adjoins the Mound and Santa Paula Subbasins and is defined by the Oak Ridge fault. The northeastern boundary adjoins the Las Posas Valley Basin and follows parcel lines in a transitional groundwater zone. The Pleasant Valley Basin and the absence of the Mugu and Oxnard aquifers to the east, define the southeastern portion of the subbasin. The surface expression of the subbasin boundary is defined on the south by the contact of Quaternary alluvium with semi-permeable rocks of the Santa Monica Mountains (CSWRB, 1956). The Pacific Ocean is the western extent of the subbasin.Ground surface elevations range from sea level to about 150 feet above sea level (CSWRB 1956). Calleguas Creek and other tributary creeks drain the surface waters of the area westward into the Pacific Ocean. The Santa Clara River provides recharge along the northern border of the subbasin (CSWRB 1956). Average precipitation ranges from 14 to 16 inches per year.The boundary is defined by six (6) segments detailed in the descriptions below. Segment Descriptions Segment Segment Description Ref Label Type 1-2 I Begins from point (1) and follows the Oak Ridge Fault to point (2). {a} Fault 2-3 E Continues from point (2) and follows the geologic contact of Quaternary {a} Alluvial alluvium with consolidated Plio-Pleistocene non-marine and marine sediments to point (3). 3-4 I Continues from point (3) and follows parcel lines to point (4).
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Clara River Valley, Ventura County David L
    Plants of the Santa Clara River Valley, Ventura County David L. Magney Wetland Indicator Scientific Name Common Name Habit Status Family Acacia melanoxylon* Blackwood Acacia T (FACU) Fabaceae Adiantum jordanii California Maidenhair PF (FAC) Pteridaceae Agrostis viridis* Green Water Bentgrass PG OBL Poaceae Alnus rhombifolia White Alder T OBL Betulaceae Amaranthus albus * Pig Amaranth AH FACU Amaranthaceae Ambrosia acanthicarpa Burweed AH . Asteraceae Ambrosia psilostachya Western Ragweed BH FAC Asteraceae Anagalis arvensis * Scarlet Pimpernel AH FAC Primulaceae Anemopsis californica var. californica Yerba Mansa PH OBL Saururaceae Apiastrum angustifolium Wild Celery PH (OBL) Apiaceae Apium graveolens* Celery PH OBL Apiaceae Araujia sericofera* Bladder Flower PV . Artemisia californica California Sagebrush S . Asteraceae Artemisia californica California Sagebrush S . Asteraceae Artemisia douglasiana Mugwort PH FACW Asteraceae Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata Great Basin Sagebrush S . Asteraceae Arundo donax * Giant Reed S FACW Poaceae Asclepias fascicularis Narrowleaf Milkweed AH FAC Asclepiadaceae Aster subulatus var. ligulatus Saltmarsh Aster PH FACW Asteraceae Astragalus sp. Locoweed PH . Fabaceae Astragalus trichopodus var. phoxus Antisell Three-pod Milkvetch PH . Fabaceae Atriplex canescens ssp. canescens Fourwing Saltbush S . Chenopodiaceae Atriplex lentiformis ssp. breweri Brewer Quailbrush S FAC* Chenopodiaceae Atriplex lentiformis ssp. lentiformis Quailbrush S FAC* Chenopodiaceae Atriplex serenana var. serenana Bractscale AH
    [Show full text]
  • 3.6 Aesthetics
    3.6 AESTHETICS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This section describes those resources that define the visual character and quality of the City’s Planning Area. The City’s Planning Area consists of its incorporated boundaries and adopted Sphere of Influence (SOI). The County’s Planning Area consists of unincorporated land within the One Valley One Vision (OVOV) Planning Area boundaries that is outside the City’s boundaries and adopted SOI. Together the City and the County Planning Areas comprise the OVOV Planning Area. Resources within the City’s Planning Area as well as the surrounding County’s Planning Area include a variety of natural and man- made elements and the viewsheds to those elements that serve as visual landmarks and contribute to the unique character of the City’s Planning Area. Although specific visual resources in the City’s Planning Area are identified in this section, it is not intended to provide an exhaustive inventory, as the nature of these resources is somewhat subjective and not easily quantified. Implementation of the proposed General Plan would increase development within the Santa Clarita Valley, which, if unregulated, would contribute to the obstruction of views, damage scenic resources, conflict with the community’s rural character, and generate substantial levels of light and glare. However, some of the proposed General Plan policies that would ensure the protection of scenic resources and corridors, promote quality construction that enhances the City’s urban form, increase open space, and landscaping, and limit light overspill. For these reasons, implementation of the City’s General Plan on aesthetics would be less than significant.
    [Show full text]
  • STATUS of the CALIFORNIA GNATCATCHER at the NORTHERN EDGE of ITS RANGE Daniel S
    STATUS OF THE CALIFORNIA GNATCATCHER AT THE NORTHERN EDGE OF ITS RANGE DANIEL S. COOPER, Cooper Ecological Monitoring, Inc., 255 Satinwood Ave., Oak Park, California 91377; [email protected] JENNIFER MONGOLO, Streamscape Environmental, 5042 Wilshire Blvd. #33273, Los Angeles, California 90036; [email protected] CHRIS DELLITH, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2493 Portola Road Suite B, Ventura, California 93003; [email protected] ABSTRACT: At the northern edge of its range, the California Gnatcatcher has long been known to occur from eastern Ventura County east into northwestern Los Angeles County, but the current status of birds in these areas is not well understood. We review historical and recent sources of information and draw two main conclusions: first, that the California Gnatcatcher population that once existed from the lower Santa Clara River Valley in Ventura County east/upstream to Santa Paula and Simi Valley has likely contracted to the southeast. Second, that the current, consistent range of the species in Los Angeles County does not extend north of the San Gabriel Valley. The California Gnatcatcher is evidently extirpated from the San Fernando Valley and never occurred regularly in the Santa Clarita area to the northwest. Dispersing and even occasionally nesting birds in northwestern Los Angeles County have not resulted in a stable, consistent population there. Misinterpretation of seasonal movements and isolated sightings of the California Gnatcatcher here may have led to a misunderstand- ing of the boundaries of its normal range, as well as the misapplication of critical habitat as defined under the Endangered Species Act. As a result, we recommend that immediate conservation efforts be focused in areas where birds are conclusively known to occur, namely, the Thousand Oaks/Moorpark area of Ventura County, and that coastal sage scrub at low elevations in the Santa Clarita and especially the northeastern San Fernando Valley areas of Los Angeles County be systematically searched to locate any remaining populations.
    [Show full text]