DOCSLIB.ORG

National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: _Union Iron Works Historic District_______________________________ Other names/site number: Potrero Works, Union Yard, Bethlehem Steel Yard, Potrero Yard, San Francisco Yard _____________________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: _N/A__________________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: South of Illinois Street between 18th and 22nd Streets City or town: San Francisco State: California County: San Francisco _ Not For Publication: Vicinity: ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ___ meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: ___national ___statewide ___local Applicable National Register Criteria: ___A ___B ___C ___D Signature of certifying official/Title: Date ______________________________________________ State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. Signature of commenting official: Date Title : State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government 1 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Union Iron Works Historic District San Francisco, California Name of Property County and State _____________________________________________________________________________ 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that this property is: entered in the National Register determined eligible for the National Register determined not eligible for the National Register removed from the National Register other (explain:) _____________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Signature of the Keeper Date of Action ____________________________________________________________________________ 5. Classification Ownership of Property (Check as many boxes as apply.) Private: X Public – Local X Public – State Public – Federal Category of Property (Check only one box.) Building(s) X District Site Structure Object Sections 1-6 page 2 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Union Iron Works Historic District San Francisco, California Name of Property County and State Number of Resources within Property (Do not include previously listed resources in the count) Contributing Noncontributing _____38________ ______4_______ buildings ______1_______ ______0_______ sites ______4_______ ______7_______ structures ______0_______ ______0_______ objects _____43______ _____11_______ Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register ____0_____ ____________________________________________________________________________ 6. Function or Use Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions.) _INDUSTRY/manufacturing facility – shipyard/ship repair__________ _DEFENSE/naval facility – shipyard/ship repair __________________ _GOVERNMENT/office – Naval office ___________ _______ _COMMERCE/professional – shipyard office ___________ _______ _INDUSTRY/industrial storage –warehouse ____________ ______ ___________________ Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions.) _INDUSTRY/manufacturing facility – ship repair ___________ _GOVERNMENT/storage – warehouse _________________ _ _COMMERCIAL/storage – warehouse ________________ __ _COMMERCIAL/professional – artist studio ____________ __ _VACANT/NOT IN USE ________________ _ ___________________ Sections 1-6 page 3 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Union Iron Works Historic District San Francisco, California Name of Property County and State _____________________________________________________________________________ 7. Description Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions.) _ OTHER - Industrial ______________ ____ _ MODERN MOVEMENT – Moderne ________________ __ _ LATE 19TH and 20TH CENTURY REVIVALS – Beaux Arts _ LATE 19TH and 20TH CENTURY REVIVALS – Classical _ _ LATE VICTORIAN – Renaissance Revival _______ ____ ___________________ Materials: (enter categories from instructions.) Principal exterior materials of the property: foundations concrete; brick; wood roofs metal – iron/steel; tar and gravel; wood walls metal – iron/steel; brick; concrete; wood walls plastic sheeting other terra cotta Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current physical appearance and condition of the property. Describe contributing and noncontributing resources if applicable. Begin with a summary paragraph that briefly describes the general characteristics of the property, such as its location, type, style, method of construction, setting, size, and significant features. Indicate whether the property has historic integrity.) ______________________________________________________________________________ Summary Paragraph The Union Iron Works (UIW) shipyard, located at Potrero Point in San Francisco, California, comprises 65 acres.1 Bordered by the San Francisco Bay, it lies at the foot of Potrero Hill in San Francisco’s Central Waterfront District (Figures 1 and 2). The area is primarily industrial, with a power plant and the historic American Can Company building nearby, and is rapidly being transformed to a mixed-use district including commercial, light industrial, and residential uses. The Dogpatch Local Historic District — a primarily residential neighborhood interspersed with commercial establishments — lies several blocks to the west. Third Street, one block west of the district, is the main thoroughfare connecting to the rest of the city, with a light rail line extending public transportation to the area. The district itself features 54 contributing and 1 Union Iron Works moved to Potrero Point in 1884, and the shipyard has taken on many names over the years. For consistency in the following pages, the name Union Iron Works (UIW) is used to indicate all incarnations of the shipyard associated with Pier 70 from 1884 to 1945. The Ownership Map (Figure 3) shows the rough boundary of the Union Iron Works Shipyard in 1884 along with the various owners of the southeastern portion of the district prior to the U.S. Navy purchase of the area in 1940 and the construction of the extant Building 12 Complex. Previous owners included Pacific Rolling Mills (1868-1900), Risdon Iron and Locomotive Works (1900-1912), and U.S. Steel Products Company (1912-1940) who owned the land when the U.S. Destroyer yard was built and operated by the Union Iron Works Company. Section 7 page 4 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Union Iron Works Historic District San Francisco, California Name of Property County and State noncontributing resources, including buildings, piers, slips, cranes, segments of a railroad network, and landscape elements. Most buildings are industrial, constructed of unreinforced brick masonry, concrete, and steel framing with corrugated iron or steel cladding. There are also several architect designed buildings from prominent San Francisco late nineteenth and early twentieth century architectural firms. Also present are modified waterfront structures inherent to shipbuilding and ship repair, including slipways, wharves, and floating drydocks, remnants of the district’s historical function. The property maintains exceptional integrity in terms of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. ____________________________________________________________________________ Narrative Description Site Overview Union Iron Works stands on what was once a small promontory surrounded by deep waters, called Point San Quentin in the 1850s and later renamed Potrero Point. By the late 1870s, a bird’s-eye view showed Potrero Point developed with industrial and residential buildings. No filling or grading of the point occurred prior to the construction of Union Iron Works during the early 1880s.2 In 1884, Union Iron Works moved from the northwest corner of First
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Miles Poindexter Papers, 1897-1940
    Miles Poindexter papers, 1897-1940 Overview of the Collection Creator Poindexter, Miles, 1868-1946 Title Miles Poindexter papers Dates 1897-1940 (inclusive) 1897 1940 Quantity 189.79 cubic feet (442 boxes ) Collection Number 3828 (Accession No. 3828-001) Summary Papers of a Superior Court Judge in Washington State, a Congressman, a United States Senator, and a United States Ambassador to Peru Repository University of Washington Libraries, Special Collections. Special Collections University of Washington Libraries Box 352900 Seattle, WA 98195-2900 Telephone: 206-543-1929 Fax: 206-543-1931 [email protected] Access Restrictions Open to all users. Languages English. Sponsor Funding for encoding this finding aid was partially provided through a grant awarded by the National Endowment for the Humanities Biographical Note Miles Poindexter, attorney, member of Congress from Washington State, and diplomat, was born in 1868 in Tennessee and grew up in Virginia. He attended Washington and Lee University (undergraduate and law school), receiving his law degree in 1891. He moved to Walla Walla, Washington, was admitted to the bar and began his law practice. He entered politics soon after his arrival and ran successfully for County Prosecutor as a Democrat in 1892. Poindexter moved to Spokane in 1897 where he continued the practice of law. He switched to the Republican Party in Spokane, where he received an appointment as deputy prosecuting attorney (1898-1904). In 1904 he was elected Superior Court Judge. Poindexter became identified with progressive causes and it was as a progressive Republican and a supporter of Theodore Roosevelt that he was elected to the House of Representatives in 1908 and to the Senate in 1910.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.S. Oregon City (CA-122) by James V
    U.S.S. Oregon City (CA-122) By James V. Hillegas-Elting The U.S.S. Oregon City (CA-122) was the namesake of its class of heavy cruisers. Designed, ordered, and built during World War II, it was an advanced warship; but the war emergency was over when the ship entered full service in early 1946. About two-and-a-half years after Secretary Frank Knox announced the navy's plan to build a ship to honor Oregon City, Bethlehem Steel Company in Quincy, Massachusetts, launched the ship on June 9, 1945. The wife of Oregon City Commissioner Raymond P. Caufield was present to sponsor the ship, and singer Bing Crosby attended as part of a war bond drive. The Oregon City class weighed 13,000 tons, was 673’5” long, and had a beam of 70’10”, draft of 26’4”, and speed of 32.6 knots. The class carried a crew of 1,142, and its main armament was nine 8” guns in three turrets (two fore and one aft). For air defense, it had twelve 5” guns, forty-eight 40mm guns, and twenty 20mm guns. The navy planned to build ten ships of the class, but only two others were built as heavy cruisers: the Albany (CA-123), launched on June 30, 1945, and the Rochester (CA-124), launched on August 28, 1945. Once commissioned in February 1946, the Oregon City completed its “shakedown” cruise between Boston and Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, with Oregon City Mayor J.B. Caldwell among the guests. Based in Boston, the Oregon City served as the flagship of the 4th Fleet from July 1946 until its reassignment to the 2nd Fleet in January 1947.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress
    Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress (name redacted) Specialist in Naval Affairs December 13, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RS22478 Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress Summary Names for Navy ships traditionally have been chosen and announced by the Secretary of the Navy, under the direction of the President and in accordance with rules prescribed by Congress. Rules for giving certain types of names to certain types of Navy ships have evolved over time. There have been exceptions to the Navy’s ship-naming rules, particularly for the purpose of naming a ship for a person when the rule for that type of ship would have called for it to be named for something else. Some observers have perceived a breakdown in, or corruption of, the rules for naming Navy ships. On July 13, 2012, the Navy submitted to Congress a 73-page report on the Navy’s policies and practices for naming ships. For ship types now being procured for the Navy, or recently procured for the Navy, naming rules can be summarized as follows: The first Ohio replacement ballistic missile submarine (SBNX) has been named Columbia in honor of the District of Columbia, but the Navy has not stated what the naming rule for these ships will be. Virginia (SSN-774) class attack submarines are being named for states. Aircraft carriers are generally named for past U.S. Presidents. Of the past 14, 10 were named for past U.S. Presidents, and 2 for Members of Congress. Destroyers are being named for deceased members of the Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard, including Secretaries of the Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • By Dead Reckoning by Bill Mciver
    index Abernathy, Susan McIver 23 , 45–47 36 , 42 Acheson, Dean Bao Dai 464 and Korea 248 , 249 Barrish, Paul 373 , 427 first to state domino theory 459 Bataan, Battling Bastards of 332 Acuff, Roy 181 Bataan Death March 333 Adams, M.D 444 Bataan Gang. See MacArthur, Douglas Adams, Will 31 Bataan Peninsula 329–333 Adkisson, Paul L. 436. See also USS Colahan bathythermograph 455 Alameda, California 268 , 312 , 315 , 317 , 320 , Battle of Coral Seas 296–297 335 , 336 , 338 , 339 , 345 , 346 , 349 , Battle off Samars 291 , 292 , 297–298 , 303 , 351 , 354 , 356 306–309 , 438 Alamogordo, New Mexico 63 , 64 Bedichek, Roy 220 Albano, Sam 371 , 372 , 373 , 414 , 425 , 426 , Bee County, Texas 12 , 17 , 19 427 Beeville, Texas 19 Albany, Texas 161 Belfast, Ireland 186 Albuquerque, New Mexico 228 , 229 Bengal, Oklahoma 94 Allred, Lue Jeff 32 , 44 , 200 Bidault, Georges 497 , 510 Alpine, Texas 67 Big Cypress Bayou, Texas 33 Amarillo, Texas 66 , 88 , 122 , 198 , 431 Big Spring, Texas 58 , 61 , 68 , 74 , 255 , 256 Ambrose, Stephen Bikini Atoll. See Operation Castle on Truman’s decision 466 , 467 Bilyeau, Paul 519 , 523 , 526 Anderson County, Texas 35 Blick, Robert 487 , 500 , 505 , 510 Anson County, North Carolina 21 Blytheville, Arkansas 112 Appling, Luke 224 Bockius, R.W. 272 , 273 , 288 , 289 , 290 Arapaho Reservation 50 commended by Halsey 273 Archer City, Texas 50 , 55 , 74 , 104 , 200 , 201 , during typhoon 288 , 289 , 290 259 on carrier work 272 Argyllshire, Scotland 45 Boerne, Texas 68 Arnold, Eddie 181 Bonamarte, Joseph 20 Arrington, Fred 164 Booth, Sarah 433 Ashworth, Barbara 110 , 219 , 220 , 433 , 434 Boudreau, Lou 175 Ashworth, Don 219 , 433 Bowers, Gary 361 , 375 , 386 , 427 Ashworth, Kenneth 219 , 220 Bowie, James 244 Ashworth, Mae 199 , 219 , 220 Bradley, Omar 252 Ashworth, R.B.
    [Show full text]
  • CRM Bulletin Vol. 12, No. 4 (1989)
    Cfffl BULLETIN Volume 12: No. 4 Cultural Resources Management • National Park Service 1989 A Technical Bulletin for Parks, Federal Agencies, States, Local Governments, and the Private Sector Difficult Choices and Hard-Won Successes in Maritime Preservation reserving the remnants of America's life, times, and travails. Scores of wharves, and working waterfronts Pmaritime past poses special chal­ lighthouses, lifesaving stations, and that survived the decline of America lenges and problems. Ships were built other marine structures were built on as a seafaring nation often have not to last for a few decades, and then, if isolated shores, on surf-tossed survived waterfront redevelopment not on the bottom, were torn apart beaches, or on crumbling cliffs. Sub­ and urban renewal. with sledges, axes, or cutting torches jected to the powerful fury of ocean Ships, lighthouses, and other mari­ by shipbreakers. Sailors lived a hard waves, and the corrosive salt air of time relics are often saved by people life at sea and ashore; often illiterate, the marine environment, many suc­ they left little written record of their cumbed to the sea. Those buildings, (continued on page 2) Grim Realities, High Hopes, Moderate Gains: The State of Historic Ship Preservation James P. Delgado hile maritime preservation is maritime cultural resources were historic vessels slowly followed, in Wconcerned with all aspects of the originally created to serve or assist large part after the Depression, with Nation's seafaring past, including ships and shipping. the establishment of maritime lighthouses, shipyards, canals, and Historic ship preservation in the museums that included large ships— sail lofts, the major effort and atten­ United States dates to the last cen­ Mystic Seaport being the first major tion has been devoted to historic tury, when public interest and outcry example.
    [Show full text]
  • Suicide Facts Oladeinde Is a Staff Writerall for Hands Suicide Is on the Rise Nationwide
    A L p AN Stephen Murphy (left),of Boston, AMSAN Kevin Sitterson (center), of Roper, N.C., and AN Rick Martell,of Bronx, N.Y., await the launch of an F-14 Tomcat on the flight deckof USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71). e 4 24 e 6 e e Hidden secrets Operation Deliberate Force e e The holidays are a time for giving. USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN 71) e e proves what it is made of during one of e e Make time for your shipmates- it e e could be the gift of life. the biggest military operations in Europe e e since World War 11. e e e e 6 e e 28 e e Grab those Gifts e e Merchants say thanks to those in This duty’s notso tough e e uniform. Your ID card is worth more Nine-section duty is off to a great start e e e e than you may think. and gets rave reviews aboardUSS e e Anchorage (LSD 36). e e PAGE 17 e e 10 e e The right combination 30 e e e e Norfolk hospital corpsman does studio Sailors care,do their fair share e e time at night. Seabees from CBU420 build a Habitat e e e e for Humanity house in Jacksonville, Fla. e e 12 e e e e Rhyme tyme 36 e e Nautical rhymes bring the past to Smart ideas start here e e e e everyday life. See how many you Sailors learn the ropes and get off to a e e remember.
    [Show full text]
  • USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 MARITIME HERITAGE OF THE UNITED STATES NHL THEME STUDY LARGE VESSELS FERRY BERKELEY Page 1 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Berkeley Other Name/Site Number: Ferry Berkeley 2. LOCATION Street & Number: B Street Pier Not for publication: City/Town: San Diego Vicinity: State: CA County: San Diego Code: 073 Zip Code: 92101 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: X Building(s):_ Public-local: District:_ Public-State: __ Site: Public-Federal: Structure: X Object:__ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing ____ buildings ____ sites ____ structures ____ objects Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 0 Name of related multiple property listing: NFS FORM 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 FERRY BERKELEY Page 2 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this ___ nomination ___request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ___ meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria. Signature of Certifying Official Date State or Federal Agency and Bureau In my opinion, the property ___ meets ___ does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of Pier 70 Area
    NPS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number 8 Page 4 Chronology of the Pier 70 District The following chronology outlines significant events associated with the Pier 70 Historic District including the history of Union Iron Works, Bethlehem Steel, Pacific Rolling Mills, Risdon Iron and Locomotive Works, U. S. Steel Corp., and U. S. Navy, all land owners in the district during the period of significance. This chronology also includes significant events that shaped the United States steel hull shipbuilding industry. 1849 Donahue brothers open California’s first iron foundry during the height of the California Gold Rush 1853 Peter Donahue becomes the sole-owner and renames the works the Union Iron Works 1857 Bethlehem Steel Company starts as an iron works in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania c.1860 Wooden shipbuilders John North and Henry Owen move to Potrero Point 1861-1865 Civil War 1865 Irving M. Scott becomes a partner and Peter Donahue retires 1868 Pacific Rolling Mills opens on Potrero Point as the first steel mill on West Coast c.1870s Irish Hill neighborhood established Union Iron Works purchases Henry Owen’s shipyard 1884 The Union Iron Works shipyard opens 1885 First U. S. Naval contract for steel hull ship given to John Roach’s Delaware River Iron Shipbuilding and Engine Works shipyard (“ABCD ships”, or Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, and Dolphin) San Francisco iron workers’ strike successfully for higher
    [Show full text]
  • DISTRICT RECORD Trinomial
    State of California & The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # DISTRICT RECORD Trinomial Page 1 of 32 *NRHP Status Code *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Potrero Point Historic District D1. Historic Name Potrero Point/Lower Potrero D2. Common Name: Central Waterfront *D3. Detailed Description (Discuss coherence of the district, its setting, visual characteristics, and minor features. List all elements of district.): The Potrero Point Historic District (also referred to as the Central Waterfront) is located in the Potrero Hill district of San Francisco on the western side of San Francisco Bay in the City of San Francisco between Mission Creek on the north and Islais Creek to the south. The approximately 500-acre area is more precisely described as a roughly rectangular district bounded by Sixteenth Street to the north, San Francisco Bay to the east, Islais Creek to the south, and U.S. Interstate 280 to the west. The area measures approximately 1.3 miles from north to south, and approximately 0.6 miles wide from east to west. (See Continuation Sheet, Pg. 2) *D4. Boundary Description (Describe limits of district and attach map showing boundary and district elements.): The Potrero Point (Central Waterfront) area is enclosed within a rectangle formed by the following streets and natural features: Beginning at the northwest corner of Pennsylvania and Sixteenth streets, the northern boundary of the area extends east along Sixteenth Street into San Francisco Bay. The boundary turns ninety degrees and heads south through the bay encompassing the entirety of Piers 70 and 80. At Islais Creek Channel, the boundary makes a ninety degree turn and heads west along the southern shore of the channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Loxahatchee Quarterly, Vol 1, No.3
    Loxahatchee River Historical Society Quarterly 2020 Volume I, Number 3 The Loxahatchee River Historical Society (LRHS) is the 501(c)3 non-profit organization that operates Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse & Museum. In this Issue: Jupiter Weather Bureau History Page 2 - 4 Jupiter’s Weather Bureau Observers Page 5 - 7 Of Fish All (or The First Jupiter Fish Story?) Page 8 Scenes From Our 160th Anniversary Page 9 Keeper’s Update Page 10 - 11 Jupiter Weather Bureau Station, 1907 Celebrating 160 Years 1 Jupiter Weather Bureau History On February 9, 2020, the National Weather Service (NWS) turned 150 years old. The history of that great public service runs through many places, including Jupiter, Florida. Created by a Congressional act in 1870, the NWS formally began as the “Division of Telegrams and Reports for the Benefit of Commerce” within the US Army Signal Corps. The Signal Corps itself was only seven years old at the time. Most of the weather stations were offices in rented commercial buildings rather than purpose-built structures. The first 24 stations began recording the weather on November 1, 1870. Among these was an office in Key West since an underwater telegraph line connected that port city to Havana, Cuba and the Florida Gulf Coast in 1867. In January 1886, Rep. Egbert L. Viele of New York presented a petition from the Maritime Association of New York that requested a signal station at Jupiter. Similar maritime interests had been the first advocates for the Jupiter Inlet Lighthouse nearly four decades earlier. On February 17, 1887 an act of Congress provided funding for a government telegraph line to Jupiter, with the accompanying stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix As Too Inclusive
    Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen Appendix I A Chronological List of Cases Involving the Landing of United States Forces to Protect the Lives and Property of Nationals Abroad Prior to World War II* This Appendix contains a chronological list of pre-World War II cases in which the United States landed troops in foreign countries to pro- tect the lives and property of its nationals.1 Inclusion of a case does not nec- essarily imply that the exercise of forcible self-help was motivated solely, or even primarily, out of concern for US nationals.2 In many instances there is room for disagreement as to what motive predominated, but in all cases in- cluded herein the US forces involved afforded some measure of protection to US nationals or their property. The cases are listed according to the date of the first use of US forces. A case is included only where there was an actual physical landing to protect nationals who were the subject of, or were threatened by, immediate or po- tential danger. Thus, for example, cases involving the landing of troops to punish past transgressions, or for the ostensible purpose of protecting na- tionals at some remote time in the future, have been omitted. While an ef- fort to isolate individual fact situations has been made, there are a good number of situations involving multiple landings closely related in time or context which, for the sake of convenience, have been treated herein as sin- gle episodes. The list of cases is based primarily upon the sources cited following this paragraph.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fitting Tribute to America's Soldiers and Sailors'
    Cllj Volume 4, Issue 5 July-August 1998 I A Newsletter for the Supporters of the Hampton Roads Naval Museum I "A Fitting Tribute to America's Soldiers and Sailors'' Hampton Roads' Spanish-American War Victory Parade by Becky Poulliot orfolk's bid for a naval ship to instill patriotism, increase N tourism and prime the local economy predates the battleship Wisconsin by almost a century. On May 29, 1899 thousands on both sides of the Elizabeth River witnessed a massive parade of ships honoring the arrival of the newest addition to the 1 OOth Anniversary The Spanish-American War 1898-1998 fleet, the Reina Mercedes. Reina's story-and how she came to Hampton Roads-has all the makings of a suspense novel, with happenstance and The Virginian-Pilot produced and published this drawing ofthe Spanish unprotected cruiser Reina Mercedes in 1899. Captured and successfully salvaged in late 1898 by the U.S. Navy, the cruiser politics determining the final outcome. was an obsolete ship and had lillie combat value, even to the Spanish. Her arrival in Hampton The Reina Mercedes began her Roads, however, sparked a large parade to celebrate America 's decisive victory over the Spanish. career in 1887 as a Spanish unprotected (May 6, 1899 drawing from theVirginian-PiloV cruiser. Named for the recently under steam or sail. She and two sister insurrectionists. With the outbreak of deceased Queen Mercedes and rigged ships, Alfonso XII and Reina Cristina, the war the Spanish fleet needed every as a schooner, Reina like its early were designed by the Spanish Brigadier vessel, no matter how dilapidated.
    [Show full text]