DOCSLIB.ORG

Nuclear Physics My First Ebook Using Wikipedia by Billy Merchant

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nuclear Physics My First Ebook Using Wikipedia by Billy Merchant Nuclear Physics My first eBook using Wikipedia by Billy Merchant PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 01:40:24 UTC Contents Articles Atom 1 Atomic nucleus 19 Electron 24 Nuclear physics 41 Particle physics 46 Photon 52 Physics 68 Quantum mechanics 81 References Article Sources and Contributors 100 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 105 Article Licenses License 107 Atom 1 Atom Helium atom An illustration of the helium atom, depicting the nucleus (pink) and the electron cloud distribution (black). The nucleus (upper right) in helium-4 is in reality spherically symmetric and closely resembles the electron cloud, although for more complicated nuclei this is not always the case. The black bar is one angstrom (10−10 m or 100 pm). Classification Smallest recognized division of a chemical element Properties Mass range: 1.67×10−27 to 4.52×10−25 kg Electric charge: zero (neutral), or ion charge Diameter range: 62 pm (He) to 520 pm (Cs) (data page) Components: Electrons and a compact nucleus of protons and neutrons The atom is a basic unit of matter that consists of a dense central nucleus surrounded by a cloud of negatively charged electrons. The atomic nucleus contains a mix of positively charged protons and electrically neutral neutrons (except in the case of hydrogen-1, which is the only stable nuclide with no neutrons). The electrons of an atom are bound to the nucleus by the electromagnetic force. Likewise, a group of atoms can remain bound to each other by chemical bonds based on the same force, forming a molecule. An atom containing an equal number of protons and electrons is electrically neutral, otherwise it is positively or negatively charged and is known as an ion. An atom is classified according to the number of protons and neutrons in its nucleus: the number of protons determines the chemical element, and the number of neutrons determines the isotope of the element. Chemical atoms, which in science now carry the simple name of "atom," are minuscule objects with diameters of a few tenths of a nanometer and tiny masses proportional to the volume implied by these dimensions. Atoms can only be observed individually using special instruments such as the scanning tunneling microscope. Over 99.94% of an atom's mass is concentrated in the nucleus,[1] with protons and neutrons having roughly equal mass. Each element has at least one isotope with an unstable nucleus that can undergo radioactive decay. This can result in a transmutation that changes the number of protons or neutrons in a nucleus. Electrons that are bound to atoms possess a set of stable energy levels, or orbitals, and can undergo transitions between them by absorbing or emitting photons Atom 2 that match the energy differences between the levels. The electrons determine the chemical properties of an element, and strongly influence an atom's magnetic properties. The principles of quantum mechanics have been successfully used to model the observed properties of the atom. Etymology The name atom comes from the Greek ἄτομος (atomos, "indivisible") from ἀ- (a-, "not") and τέμνω (temnō, "I cut"), which means uncuttable, or indivisible, something that cannot be divided further. The concept of an atom as an indivisible component of matter was first proposed by early Indian and Greek philosophers. In the 18th and 19th centuries, chemists provided a physical basis for this idea by showing that certain substances could not be further broken down by chemical methods, and they applied the ancient philosophical name of atom to the chemical entity. During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, physicists discovered subatomic components and structure inside the atom, thereby demonstrating that the chemical "atom" was divisible and that the name might not be appropriate.[2] However, it was retained. This has led to some debate about whether the ancient philosophers, who intended to refer to fundamental individual objects with their concept of "atoms," were referring to modern chemical atoms, or something more like indivisible subatomic particles such as leptons or quarks, or even some more fundamental particle that has yet to be discovered.[3] History of atomic theory Atomism The concept that matter is composed of discrete units and cannot be divided into arbitrarily tiny quantities has been around for millennia, but these ideas were founded in abstract, philosophical reasoning rather than experimentation and empirical observation. The nature of atoms in philosophy varied considerably over time and between cultures and schools, and often had spiritual elements. Nevertheless, the basic idea of the atom was adopted by scientists thousands of years later because it elegantly explained new discoveries in the field of chemistry.[4] The ancient name of "atom" from atomism had already been nearly universally used to describe chemical atoms by that time, and it was therefore retained as a term, long after chemical atoms were found to be divisible, and even after smaller, truly indivisible particles were identified. References to the concept of atoms date back to ancient Greece and India. In India, the Ājīvika, Jain, and Cārvāka schools of atomism may date back to the 6th century BCE.[5] The Nyaya and Vaisheshika schools later developed theories on how atoms combined into more complex objects.[6] In the West, the references to atoms emerged in the 5th century BCE with Leucippus, whose student, Democritus, systematized his views. In approximately 450 BCE, Democritus coined the term átomos (Greek: ἄτομος), which means "uncuttable" or "the smallest indivisible particle of matter". Although the Indian and Greek concepts of the atom were based purely on philosophy, modern science has retained the name coined by Democritus.[4] Corpuscularianism is the postulate, expounded in the 13th-century by the alchemist Pseudo-Geber (Geber),[7] sometimes identified with Paul of Taranto, that all physical bodies possess an inner and outer layer of minute particles or corpuscles.[8] Corpuscularianism is similar to the theory of atomism, except that where atoms were supposed to be indivisible, corpuscles could in principle be divided. In this manner, for example, it was theorized that mercury could penetrate into metals and modify their inner structure. Corpuscularianism stayed a dominant theory over the next several hundred years. In 1661, natural philosopher Robert Boyle published The Sceptical Chymist in which he argued that matter was composed of various combinations of different "corpuscules" or atoms, rather than the classical elements of air, earth, fire and water.[9] During the 1670s corpuscularianism was used by Isaac Newton in his development of the corpuscular theory of light.[8] Atom 3 Origin of scientific theory Further progress in the understanding of atoms did not occur until the science of chemistry began to develop. In 1789, French nobleman and scientific researcher Antoine Lavoisier discovered the law of conservation of mass and defined an element as a basic substance that could not be further broken down by the methods of chemistry. In 1805, English instructor and natural philosopher John Dalton used the concept of atoms to explain why elements always react in ratios of small whole numbers (the law of multiple proportions) and why certain gases dissolved better in water than others. He proposed that each element consists of atoms of a single, unique type, and that these atoms Various atoms and molecules as depicted in John can join together to form chemical compounds.[10][11] Dalton is Dalton's A New System of Chemical Philosophy [12] considered the originator of modern atomic theory. (1808), one of the earliest scientific works on atomic theory Dalton's atomic hypothesis did not specify the size of atoms. Common sense indicated they must be very small, but nobody knew how small. Therefore it was a major landmark when in 1865 Johann Josef Loschmidt measured the size of the molecules that make up air. An additional line of reasoning in support of particle theory (and by extension atomic theory) began in 1827 when botanist Robert Brown used a microscope to look at dust grains floating in water and discovered that they moved about erratically—a phenomenon that became known as "Brownian motion". J. Desaulx suggested in 1877 that the phenomenon was caused by the thermal motion of water molecules, and in 1905 Albert Einstein produced the first mathematical analysis of the motion.[13] French physicist Jean Perrin used Einstein's work to experimentally determine the mass and dimensions of atoms, thereby conclusively verifying Dalton's atomic theory. In 1869, building upon earlier discoveries by such scientists as Lavoisier, Dmitri Mendeleev published the first functional periodic table. The table itself is a visual representation of the periodic law, which states that certain chemical properties of elements repeat periodically when arranged by atomic number.[14] Mendeleev's first periodic table (1869) Atom 4 Subcomponents and quantum theory The physicist J. J. Thomson, through his work on cathode rays in 1897, discovered the electron, and concluded that they were a component of every atom. Thus he overturned the belief that atoms are the indivisible, ultimate particles of matter. Thomson postulated that the low mass, negatively charged electrons were distributed throughout the atom, possibly rotating in rings, with their charge balanced by the presence of a uniform sea of positive charge. This later became known as the plum pudding model. In 1909, Hans Geiger and Ernest Marsden, under the direction of physicist Ernest Rutherford, bombarded a sheet of gold foil with alpha rays—by then known to be positively charged helium atoms—and discovered that a small percentage of these particles were deflected A generic atomic planetary model, or the through much larger angles than was predicted using Thomson's Rutherford model proposal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Samuel Goudsmit
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES SAMUEL ABRAHAM GOUDSMIT 1 9 0 2 — 1 9 7 8 A Biographical Memoir by BENJAMIN BEDERSON Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 2008 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON, D.C. Photograph courtesy Brookhaven National Laboratory. SAMUEL ABRAHAM GOUDSMIT July 11, 1902–December 4, 1978 BY BENJAMIN BEDERSON AM GOUDSMIT LED A CAREER that touched many aspects of S20th-century physics and its impact on society. He started his professional life in Holland during the earliest days of quantum mechanics as a student of Paul Ehrenfest. In 1925 together with his fellow graduate student George Uhlenbeck he postulated that in addition to mass and charge the electron possessed a further intrinsic property, internal angular mo- mentum, that is, spin. This inspiration furnished the missing link that explained the existence of multiple spectroscopic lines in atomic spectra, resulting in the final triumph of the then struggling birth of quantum mechanics. In 1927 he and Uhlenbeck together moved to the United States where they continued their physics careers until death. In a rough way Goudsmit’s career can be divided into several separate parts: first in Holland, strictly as a theorist, where he achieved very early success, and then at the University of Michigan, where he worked in the thriving field of preci- sion spectroscopy, concerning himself with the influence of nuclear magnetism on atomic spectra. In 1944 he became the scientific leader of the Alsos Mission, whose aim was to determine the progress Germans had made in the development of nuclear weapons during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Card Appendix Quantum Concepts
    1 Physics 310 Card Appendix Quantum Concepts Table of Contents 0. Blackbody Radiation ​2 3. Normalize ​2 4. Angular Momentum ​3 4. Hydrogen ​4 5. Wavefunction ​4 6. Photoelectric Effect ​5 7. Lowering Operator ​5 8. Schrodinger's Cat ​6 9. Famous Physicists ​6 9.1 ​Vera Rubin ​6 9.2​ Lene Hau ​7 9.3​ Fabiola Gianotti ​7 9.4 ​Maria Goeppert-Mayer ​8 10. Entanglement ​8 11. Spooky Action at a Distance ​9 12. Raising Operator ​9 14​. Tunneling ​10 25. CERN ​10 2 0.​ Blackbody Radiation: Blackbody radiation occurs when light waves hit a black body (such as a star) and releases a different type of light wave that depends on the particular black body. Classical physics expected that the intensity of radiation would increase as the wavelength of the emitted light was smaller, but in reality, the radiation followed the curves below it. Max Planck found out that energy can exist in a very small packet, and in doing so, he was able to adjust the theory so that the theoretical curves matched the actual curves 3. ​Normalize: A particle must be found somewhere in space. This relationship is represented by the above equation. This equation means that the probability of finding a wavefunction is 1, just as the probability of you rolling a 1,2,3,4,5 or 6 on a 6 sided die being 1. If you normalize a wave function at some time t0​ ​, then it will be normalized for all t. 3 4. ​Angular Momentum: Angular momentum (L) is conversed just like classical linear momentum and it is the product of the moment of inertia and angular velocity.
    [Show full text]
  • Bose-Einstein Condensation
    Low Dimensional Systems and Nanostructures Jon Ander Arregi Bose-Einstein Condensation A Bose-Einstein condensate is a state of a dilute gas, sometimes also called fifth state of matter, of weakly interacting bosons (i.e., particles with integer spin) confined by an external potential and cooled down to temperatures very near to the absolute zero. At low enough temperatures the system undergoes a transition to a state with a large fraction of the bosons occupying the lowest energy level, corresponding to a zero momentum state, at which quantum effects become apparent on a macroscopic scale. In 1924, the indian physicist Satyendra Nath Bose was working on the quantum statistics of light quanta (nowadays called photons) but he had troubles getting people to accept his ideas. He sent his results to Albert Einstein, who realised of the importance of his work and he translated and sent Bose's paper for publication [1]. Einstein extended the description for massive particles and he found out that something very unusual was supposed to happen at very low temperatures [2]. It was not until 1995, after decades of huge efforts seeking for the experimental evidence, that the first realization of the Bose-Einstein condensate of a gas of around two thousand 87Rb atoms cooled down to 170 nanokelvin (nK) was made by Eric Cornell, Carl Wieman and co-workers at the University of Colorado at Boulder [3]. Four months later, the group led by Wolfgang Ketterle at MIT created a condensate of 23Na with a hundred times more atoms [4], allowing him to observe important effects such as quantum mechanical interference between different condensates [5].
    [Show full text]
  • Slower Than a Speeding Bullet Lene Hau Gives the Inside Scoop on Slowing Light to 38 Mph Interview by Katrina Garcia Dr
    Journal of Undergraduate Sciences FEATURES Slower than a Speeding Bullet Lene Hau gives the inside scoop on slowing light to 38 mph interview by Katrina Garcia Dr. Lene Hau of the Rowland Institute was recently in the national spotlight for slowing the speed of light by a factor of 20 million. Here, in an interview with JUS, she explains her research, talks about the ups and downs of the scientific endeavor, and offers her advice to aspiring scientists. Q: Please explain how you slowed down light. A: When you send light into glassglass has a refractive index of 1.5a vacuum has 1, sort of a reference point, right? That means, since the refractive index of glass is a little bit larger than 1.5, it means that light will slow down when it goes in there, but that factor of 1.5, so it slows down 50 percent. We slow it down [by a factor of] 20 million. To do that, we need a much more subtle effect, a much more interesting effect. And its really a quantum mechanical effect. (Dr. Hau goes on to explain the procedure that elicits this effect.) In the lab we have a fantastic atom refrigerator that al- lows us to get some really, really cold [sodium] atoms. First, we make what is called an optical molasses, a really Dr. Hau looks over the apparatus used to slow light. viscous medium set up by three pairs of counter-propa- gating laser beams, two just a little bit below the atomic resonance frequency. In this viscous medium we cool the atoms to a millionth of a degree above absolute zero.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass, Energy and Momentum of Photon in Medium
    Vol. 8(21), pp. 1190-1192, 9 June, 2013 International Journal of Physical DOI: 10.5897/IJPS12.625 ISSN 1992-1950 © 2013 Academic Journals Sciences http://www.academicjournals.org/IJPS Short Communication Mass, energy and momentum of photon in medium Adnan Salih Department of Physics, College of Science for Women, Baghdad University, Iraq. Accepted 13 May, 2013 When photon travels in a medium where the velocity is lower than the speed of light, the photon possesses both the kinetic (E k) and the potential (E p) energy. We proved that the energy of photon (E = nE k), where (n) is the refractive index, and the effective mass of photon in medium (m' = nm), where (m) is the effective mass of photon in vacuum. Also we proved that the momentum of photon (p = E/c) inside medium. Key word: Mass, momentum, energy. INTRODUCTION Suppose that a photon, having momentum ħk in vacuum, in that we need to discriminate between phase and group enters a transparent medium with index of refraction n > indices (Milonni and Boyd, 2005; Loudon et al., 2005; 1. What is the photon’s new momentum? Remarkably, Garrison and Chiao, 2004). The debate that this work there is still no definite answer. In 1908, the German started has continued till the present day, punctuated by Hermann Minkowski derived one possible, yet surprising the occasional publication of ‘decisive’ experimental answer. The photon momentum should actually increase demonstrations supporting one or other of these values and take the value n ħk. In effect, Minkowski started from (Phil. Trans. R. Soc, 2010), Stephen Barnett of the Einstein’s earlier suggestion that a photon’s energy is University of Strathclyde in the UK has concluded that given by E = h υ.
    [Show full text]
  • A Selected Bibliography of Publications By, and About, Samuel A
    A Selected Bibliography of Publications by, and about, Samuel A. Goudsmit Nelson H. F. Beebe University of Utah Department of Mathematics, 110 LCB 155 S 1400 E RM 233 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0090 USA Tel: +1 801 581 5254 FAX: +1 801 581 4148 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (Internet) WWW URL: http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe/ 10 January 2020 Version 1.03 Title word cross-reference $3.50 [Bar30, Rid47]. 136 [Cha72]. 138 [Cha72]. 140 [Cha72]. 142 [Cha72]. g [Gou25g]. Sa [Ive10]. Z [LHLT64]. Za [Ive10]. -dependent [LHLT64]. -Werte [Gou25g]. 1947 [Hen48, Whi48]. 1952 [Gou53b]. 1953 [Gou53a]. 1964 [Gou65a]. 1978 [Bed08b, Dre79]. 1983 [Moy84]. 1987 [Lug69]. 1988 [DGS89]. 3d [Tho97]. A-Bomb [Rec91, LRD+91, Bro93, Mac85]. Abides [Gla00]. Abraham [Bed08a, Bed08b]. Absorption [ZHG36]. Abstracts [GT66a, GT68, Gou69a]. Academy [Coc77, Jew77]. accept [Ano54a]. Acceptance [Gou72b]. Account [Lan54]. Ad [Gou72a]. Affirm [ACU+54]. 1 2 Again [GT66c, Gou73e, Rai85]. Age [Lan48, Sul78, Lan59a, Lan59b, Lap59]. AIP [Ano75]. Alamos [Bet91]. Alan [Gou78b]. Alfred [Hol93a, LH93]. Allies [Hol93b]. Alsos [Gou48c, Ano12, Gou47g, Gou47h, Gou47e, Gou48c, Gou51, Gou62, Gou83, Gou96, Pas69, Pas80, Ano48a, Gue50, Hen48, Moy84, Tre83, Whi48]. ALSOS. [Rid47]. Am [Gou74b]. amend [NG70]. American [EBU+52, Gou47b]. Americans [Lan54]. Among [Tre83]. Analyses [BG32, BG68]. Analysis [Gou74a, Wer10]. Analyzed [Gou47c]. Ancient [Gou81]. Angeles [Moy84, Tre83]. Angeles/San [Tre83]. Angewandte [Gou50a]. Angle [Win89, Win87]. Angry [Gou63]. Angular [BL96, NLCS05]. Announcement [Gou58c, Gou58d, Gou58e, Gou68d]. Anomalies [GB33]. Anomalous [Ben38]. anonymity [WG67]. antiquities [RG82]. Application [Hei47a, Hei47b, MU56]. applications [Ike17]. Applied [Gou50a]. Appraisal [Hei49]. Arbeiten [Hei46].
    [Show full text]
  • Naturvidenskabelige Fortællinger Fra Søauditorierne
    25 Sorte huller i universet. Aldringens gåde. Kemien i velsmag. Kvantemekanik. Kaskelottens næse. Kortlægning af grundvand med helikopter. SØFORKLARINGER Forskerne har været vidt omkring ved 25 SØFORKLARINGER Offentlige foredrag i Naturvidenskab ved Aarhus Universitet. Dragende emner, nørdede emner, dagligdags emner Naturvidenskabelige fortællinger – og emner de fleste af os aldrig har hørt om. Men publikum strømmer til. Aften efter aften – fra Søauditorierne Se mere år efter år. Mere end 800 mennesker løser billet til Søauditorierne i Aarhus Universitetspark på på en typisk foredragsaften, og foredragene gentages scitech.au.dk/foredrag ofte tre aftner i træk. I denne bog skriver forskerne bag 25 af foredragene om det emne, de har fortalt det talstærke publikum om. Bogen giver et bredt indblik i aktuel dansk forskning inden for naturvidenskab. Og samtidig giver den indsigt i, hvordan en foredragsrække om naturvidenskab har udviklet sig til et offentligt tilløbsstykke, der har vakt opsigt i ind- og udland. ISBN 978-87-7124-096-2 Aarhus Universitetsforlag a Aarhus Universitetsforlag 9 788771 240962 95511_cover_25 soeforklaringer_cs5-5.indd 1 06/03/14 15.23 25 søforklaringer 25 søforklaringer Naturvidenskabelige fortællinger fra Søauditorierne Aarhus Universitetsforlag | a 6 Forord 8 Når naturvidenskab trækker fulde huse Carsten Rabæk Kjaer 16 Tidens relative gang Ulrik Uggerhøj 30 Den røde planets hemmeligheder Per Nørnberg 46 Vand, vand og atter vand Søren Rud Keiding 62 Den flyvende pilekvist Kurt I. Sørensen 78 Menneskets evolution Peter K.A. Jensen 96 Moderne kosmologi – Verdenshistorien bind 0 Steen Hannestad 108 Kvantemekanikken og universets byggesten Klaus Mølmer 120 It – når det rykker Mogens Nielsen 134 En oplyst videnskab: temaer fra 1700-tallet Helge Kragh 148 Netværk og agurker med Bourbon whiskey Jens M.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Quirk: Stopped Laser Pulse Reappears a Short Distance Away: Scientific Ameri
    Quantum Quirk: Stopped Laser Pulse Reappears a Short Distance Away: Scientific Ameri... Page 1 of 2 News - February 7, 2007 Quantum Quirk: Stopped Laser Pulse Reappears a Short Distance Away Supercold atoms learn how to play catch with light By JR Minkel Harvard University researchers have halted a pulse of laser light in its tracks and revived it a fraction of a millimeter away. Here's the twist: they stopped it in a cloud of supercold sodium atoms, known as a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC), and then restarted it in a second, distinct BEC as though the pulse had spookily jumped between the two locations. "It's odd," says atomic physicist Lene Hau, the team's leader. "We can actually revive the light pulse and send it back on its way as if nothing had happened." Besides being a neat quantum game of catch, Hau speculates that the technique may someday be used in optical communications or ultraprecise navigation systems. BEC clouds are prized because their atoms' delicate quantum states all vibrate in unison, effectively creating one big atom that does things individual atoms cannot. In 1999, for example, Hau's group slowed light inside a condensate to "bicycle speed" (38 mph). For the new experiment, she and her colleagues shined a control laser beam through two independent BECs placed side by side. They struck the first BEC with a laser pulse, which slowed and transferred its energy into a collective shudder of the condensate atoms—a sort of slow-moving ripple of matter that mirrored the laser pulse. The researchers shut off the control beam long enough to give the wave time to travel the 160 microns between the BECs and then reactivated it.
    [Show full text]
  • History Newsletter CENTER for HISTORY of PHYSICS&NIELS BOHR LIBRARY & ARCHIVES Vol
    History Newsletter CENTER FOR HISTORY OF PHYSICS&NIELS BOHR LIBRARY & ARCHIVES Vol. 43, No. 1 • Summer 2011 Taking Technology Through the “Valley of Death,” Physicists Don’t Fear Risk As the History of Physics Entrepreneur- Physicists are highly skilled in risk Two other issues surprised us by ship (HoPE) project transitions from the analysis and few, if any, appear inclined the degree to which they influenced interview phase to the analysis phase, to venture into activity at which they physics-based innovation in the US. The new and intriquing insights have begun do not feel confident they will succeed role of the federal SBIR/STTR programs to bubble to the surface. The project even though they are aware that they in providing resources to enable high staff have completed 114 interviews with are bringing new technologies through tech innovation appears critical. SBIR/ physicist entrepreneurs, STTR grants play at least 11 interviews with univers- two important roles. At ity intellectual property one level they provide transfer offices, and two critical seed funding for interviews with venture ideas and innovations capitalists throughout that have not yet the U.S. With field trips reached a stage that will to Georgia and Colorado attract venture capital remaining on the agenda, or angel investment. we expect to interview At another level they another ten to fifteen provide an essential physicist entrepreneurs resource for companies and five or six venture whose technologies are capitalists. We’ll then nearly fully developed spend the last year of but have not yet found the three-year study their proper market coding and analyzing and for whom venture the interviews and other capitalists are either resources and compiling our findings.
    [Show full text]
  • Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project, 1939-1945: a Study in German Culture
    Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project http://content.cdlib.org/xtf/view?docId=ft838nb56t&chunk.id=0&doc.v... Preferred Citation: Rose, Paul Lawrence. Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project, 1939-1945: A Study in German Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1998 1998. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft838nb56t/ Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project A Study in German Culture Paul Lawrence Rose UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley · Los Angeles · Oxford © 1998 The Regents of the University of California In affectionate memory of Brian Dalton (1924–1996), Scholar, gentleman, leader, friend And in honor of my father's 80th birthday Preferred Citation: Rose, Paul Lawrence. Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project, 1939-1945: A Study in German Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1998 1998. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft838nb56t/ In affectionate memory of Brian Dalton (1924–1996), Scholar, gentleman, leader, friend And in honor of my father's 80th birthday ― ix ― ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For hospitality during various phases of work on this book I am grateful to Aryeh Dvoretzky, Director of the Institute of Advanced Studies of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, whose invitation there allowed me to begin work on the book while on sabbatical leave from James Cook University of North Queensland, Australia, in 1983; and to those colleagues whose good offices made it possible for me to resume research on the subject while a visiting professor at York University and the University of Toronto, Canada, in 1990–92. Grants from the College of the Liberal Arts and the Institute for the Arts and Humanistic Studies of The Pennsylvania State University enabled me to complete the research and writing of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • The Atomic Number Revolution in Chemistry: a Kuhnian Analysis
    Found Chem https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-017-9303-6 The atomic number revolution in chemistry: a Kuhnian analysis K. Brad Wray1 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017 Abstract This paper argues that the field of chemistry underwent a significant change of theory in the early twentieth century, when atomic number replaced atomic weight as the principle for ordering and identifying the chemical elements. It is a classic case of a Kuhnian revolution. In the process of addressing anomalies, chemists who were trained to see elements as defined by their atomic weight discovered that their theoretical assump- tions were impediments to understanding the chemical world. The only way to normalize the anomalies was to introduce new concepts, and a new conceptual understanding of what it is to be an element. In the process of making these changes, a new scientific lexicon emerged, one that took atomic number to be the defining feature of a chemical element. Keywords Atomic number Á Atomic weight Á Revolutionary theory change Á Isotope Á Kuhn Á Lexical change The aim of this paper is to provide an analysis of the discovery of atomic number and its effects on chemistry. The paper aims to show that this is a classic textbook case of a Kuhnian scientific revolution. The analysis serves two purposes. First, it provides another case of a Kuhnian revolution, thus offering support for Thomas Kuhn’s theory of scientific change, which has been subjected to criticism on an ongoing basis (see, most recently, Scerri 2016). Second, it provides a compelling unifying narrative of some of the most important research in chemistry in the early twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: the PRINCIPAL UNCERTAINTY: U.S
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: THE PRINCIPAL UNCERTAINTY: U.S. ATOMIC INTELLIGENCE, 1942-1949 Vincent Jonathan Houghton, Doctor of Philosophy, 2013 Dissertation directed by: Professor Jon T. Sumida Department of History The subject of this dissertation is the U. S. atomic intelligence effort against both Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union in the period 1942-1949. Both of these intelligence efforts operated within the framework of an entirely new field of intelligence: scientific intelligence. Because of the atomic bomb, for the first time in history a nation’s scientific resources – the abilities of its scientists, the state of its research institutions and laboratories, its scientific educational system – became a key consideration in assessing a potential national security threat. Considering how successfully the United States conducted the atomic intelligence effort against the Germans in the Second World War, why was the United States Government unable to create an effective atomic intelligence apparatus to monitor Soviet scientific and nuclear capabilities? Put another way, why did the effort against the Soviet Union fail so badly, so completely, in all potential metrics – collection, analysis, and dissemination? In addition, did the general assessment of German and Soviet science lead to particular assumptions about their abilities to produce nuclear weapons? How did this assessment affect American presuppositions regarding the German and Soviet strategic threats? Despite extensive historical work on atomic intelligence, the current historiography has not adequately addressed these questions. THE PRINCIPAL UNCERTAINTY: U.S. ATOMIC INTELLIGENCE, 1942-1949 By Vincent Jonathan Houghton Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2013 Advisory Committee: Professor Jon T.
    [Show full text]