THE REVENGE of Bussy D'ambois

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE REVENGE of Bussy D'ambois Bussy D'Ambois and The Revenge of Bussy D'Ambois George Chapman Introduction The group of Chapman's plays based upon recent French history, to which Bussy D'Ambois and its sequel belong, forms one of the most unique memorials of the Elizabethan drama. The playwrights of the period were profoundly interested in the annals of their own country, and exploited them for the stage with a magnificent indifference to historical accuracy. Gorboduc and Locrine were as real to them as any Lancastrian or Tudor prince, and their reigns were made to furnish salutary lessons to sixteenth century "magistrates." Scarcely less interesting were the heroes of republican Greece and Rome: Caesar, Pompey, and Antony, decked out in Elizabethan garb, were as familiar to the playgoers of the time as their own national heroes, real or legendary. But the contemporary history of continental states had comparatively little attraction for the dramatists of the period, and when they handled it, they usually had some political or religious end in view. Under a thin veil of allegory, Lyly in Midas gratified his audience with a scathing denunciation of the ambition and gold- hunger of Philip II of Spain; and half a century later Middleton in a still bolder and more transparent allegory, The Game of Chess, dared to ridicule on the stage Philip's successor, and his envoy, Gondomar. But both plays were suggested by the elements of friction in the relations of England and Spain. French history also supplied material to some of the London playwrights, but almost exclusively as it bore upon the great conflict between the forces of Roman Catholicism and Protestantism. The Masaker of France, which Henslowe mentions as having been played on January 3, 1592-3, may or may not be identical with Marlowe's The Massacre at Paris, printed towards the close of the sixteenth century, but in all probability it expressed similarly the burning indignation of Protestant England at the appalling events of the Eve of St. Bartholomew. Whatever Marlowe's religious or irreligious views may have been, he acted on this occasion as the mouthpiece of the vast majority of his countrymen, and he founded on recent French history a play which, with all its defects, is of special interest to our present inquiry. For Chapman, who finished Marlowe's incompleted poem, Hero and Leander, must have been familiar with this drama, which introduced personages and events that were partly to reappear in the two Bussy plays. A brief examination of The Massacre at Paris will, therefore, help to throw into relief the special characteristics of Chapman's dramas. It opens with the marriage, in 1572, of Henry of Navarre and Margaret, sister of King Charles IX, which was intended to assuage the religious strife. But the Duke of Guise, the protagonist of the play, is determined to counterwork this policy, and with the aid of Catherine de Medicis, the Queen-Mother, and the Duke of Anjou (afterwards Henry III), he arranges the massacre of the Huguenots. Of the events of the fatal night we get a number of glimpses, including the murder of a Protestant, Scroune, by Mountsorrell (Chapman's Montsurry), who is represented as one of the Guise's most fanatical adherents. Charles soon afterwards dies, and is succeeded by his brother Henry, but "his mind runs on his minions," and Catherine and the Guise wield all real power. But there is one sphere which Guise cannot control--his wife's heart, which is given to Mugeroun, one of the "minions" of the King. Another of the minions, Joyeux, is sent against Henry of Navarre, and is defeated and slain; but Henry, learning that Guise has raised an army against his sovereign "to plant the Pope and Popelings in the realm," joins forces with the King against the rebel, who is treacherously murdered and dies crying, "Vive la messe! perish Huguenots!" His brother, the Cardinal, meets a similar fate, but the house of Lorraine is speedily revenged by a friar, who stabs King Henry. He dies, vowing vengeance upon Rome, and sending messages to Queen Elizabeth, "whom God hath bless'd for hating papistry." It is easy to see how a play on these lines would have appealed to an Elizabethan audience, while Marlowe, whether his religious sympathies were engaged or not, realized the dramatic possibilities of the figure of the Guise, one of the lawlessly aspiring brotherhood that had so irresistible a fascination for his genius. But it is much more difficult to understand why, soon after the accession of James I, Chapman should have gone back to the same period of French history, and reintroduced a number of the same prominent figures, Henry III, Guise, his Duchess, and Mountsorrell, not in their relation to great political and religious outbreaks, but grouped round a figure who can scarcely have been very familiar to the English theatre-going public--Louis de Clermont, Bussy d'Amboise.[xii-1] This personage was born in 1549, and was the eldest son of Jacques de Clermont d'Amboise, seigneur de Bussy et de Saxe-Fontaine, by his first wife, Catherine de Beauvais. He followed the career of arms, and in 1568 we hear of him as a commandant of a company. He was in Paris during the massacre of St. Bartholomew, and took advantage of it to settle a private feud. He had had a prolonged lawsuit with his cousin Antoine de Clermont, a prominent Huguenot, and follower of the King of Navarre. While his rival was fleeing for safety he had the misfortune to fall into the hands of Bussy, who dispatched him then and there. He afterwards distinguished himself in various operations against the Huguenots, and by his bravery and accomplishments won the favour of the Duke of Anjou, who, after the accession of Henry III in 1575, was heir to the throne. The Duke in this year appointed him his couronell, and henceforward he passed into his service. In 1576, as a reward for negotiating "la paix de Monsieur" with the Huguenots, the Duke received the territories of Anjou, Touraine, and Berry, and at once appointed Bussy governor of Anjou. In November the new governor arrived at Angers, the capital of the Duchy, and was welcomed by the citizens; but the disorders and exactions of his troops soon aroused the anger of the populace, and the King had to interfere in their behalf, though for a time Bussy set his injunctions at defiance. At last he retired from the city, and rejoined the Duke, in close intercourse with whom he remained during the following years, accompanying him finally on his unsuccessful expedition to the Low Countries in the summer of 1578. On Anjou's return to court in January, 1579, Bussy, who seems to have alienated his patron by his presumptuous behaviour, did not go with him, but took up his residence again in the territory of Anjou. He was less occupied, however, with his official duties than with his criminal passion for Françoise de Maridort, wife of the Comte de Monsoreau, who had been appointed grand- veneur to the Duke. The favorite mansion of the Comte was at La Coutancière, and it was here that Bussy ardently pursued his intrigue with the Countess. But a jocular letter on the subject, which he sent to the Duke of Anjou, was shown, according to the historian, De Thou, by the Duke to the King, who, in his turn, passed it on to Montsoreau. The latter thereupon forced his wife to make a treacherous assignation with Bussy at the château on the night of the 18th of August, and on his appearance, with his companion in pleasure, Claude Colasseau, they were both assassinated by the retainers of the infuriated husband. The tragic close of Bussy's life has given his career an interest disproportionate to his historical importance. But the drama of La Coutancière was only the final episode in a career crowded with romantic incidents. The annalists and memoir-writers of the period prove that Bussy's exploits as a duellist and a gallant had impressed vividly the imagination of his contemporaries. Margaret of Valois, the wife of Henry IV, Brantôme, who was a relative and friend of D'Ambois, and L'Estoile, the chronicler and journalist, are amongst those who have left us their impressions of this beau sabreur. Chapman must have had access to memorials akin to theirs as a foundation for his drama, and though, for chronological reasons, they cannot have been utilized by him, they illustrate the materials which he employed. The first two Acts of the play are chiefly occupied with Bussy's arrival at court, his entry into the service of Monsieur, his quarrel with Guise, and the duel between himself and Barrisor, with two supporters on either side. Brantôme, in his Discours sur les Duels, relates from personal knowledge an incident between Guise and Bussy, which took place shortly after the accession of Henry III. The Duke took occasion of a royal hunting party to draw Bussy alone into the forest, and to demand certain explanations of him. D'Ambois gave these in a satisfactory manner; but had he not done so, the Duke declared, in spite of their difference of rank, he would have engaged in single combat with him. The explanations demanded may well have concerned the honour of the Duchess, and we get at any rate a hint for the episode in Chapman's play (I, ii, 57-185). For the duelling narrative (II, i, 35-137) we get considerably more than a hint. Our chief authority is again Brantôme, in another work, the Discours sur les Couronnels de l'infanterie de France.
Recommended publications
  • © in This Web Service Cambridge University Press
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-03057-2 - Constructing the Canon of Early Modern Drama Jeremy Lopez Index More information Index Addison, Joseph, 45 Baldwyn, Charles Albright, Evelyn May, 41 Old English Drama, Th e , 10 , 12 , 22–23 , 149 Ancient British Drama (1810), 10 , 28 , 169 Bale, John Anonymous God’s Promises , 8 , 33 Arden of Faversham , 20 , 34 , 49 , 68 , 118 , 156 , Barish, Jonas, 110–13 169 , 170 , 197–205 Barton, Anne, 187 Birth of Merlin, Th e , 74 Baskervill, C. R., et al. Captain Th omas Stukeley , 74 , 170 Elizabethan and Stuart Plays , 8 , 11 , 59 , 169 , 185 Dick of Devonshire , 123–27 , 170 , 200–5 Beaumont, Francis, 45 , 50 , 106 , 109 Fair Em the Miller’s Daughter , 170 Knight of the Burning Pestle, Th e , 19 , 24 , 34 , Fair Maid of Bristow, Th e , 74 , 95–99 , 170 , 74–78 , 118 , 184 , 200–5 200–5 Beauties of Massinger (1817), 47 Famous Victories of Henry V, Th e , 170 Beauties of the English Stage (1737, 1777). First Part of Jeronimo, Th e , 72 See Th esaurus Dramaticus (1724) George a Green , 8 , 33 Bednarz, James, 191 Guy of Warwick , 155 , 170–72 , 200–5 Bell’s British Th eatre , 14 How a Man May Choose a Good Wife from a Bentley, Eric, 155 Bad , 22 Bentley, G. E., 188 Jack Straw , 74 , 169 Development of English Drama, Th e , 15 Knack to Know a Knave, A , 169 Berkeley, William Larum for London, A , 32 Lost Lady, Th e , 32 Locrine , 119 Betterton, Th omas London Prodigal, Th e , 170 Match in Newgate, A , 31 Look About You , 32 , 78–82 , 169 , 200–5 Bevington, David, 193 Lust’s Dominion , 6 Bevis, Richard, 153 Merry Devil of Edmonton, Th e , 33 , 169 , 170 Blackwell Anthology of Renaissance Drama .
    [Show full text]
  • Final Thesis
    Courtly Mirrors: The Politics of Chapman’s Drama Shona McIntosh, M.A. (Hons), M.Phil. Submitted in fulfilment of the degree requirements for a Doctorate in Philosophy to the University of Glasgow Department of English Literature, Faculty of Arts November 2008 2 Contents Abstract .................................................................................................. 4 Acknowledgements.................................................................................. 5 Author’s declaration ................................................................................ 6 Abbreviations .......................................................................................... 7 Chapter 1................................................................................................ 8 ‘Spirit to Dare and Power to Doe’: George Chapman at the Jacobean Court ............................................................................................................... 8 Modern Literary Criticism and George Chapman’s Drama .................. 14 General Studies of Chapman’s Drama............................................. 14 Chapman’s Ethics and Philosophy .................................................. 19 Political Readings of Chapman’s Work............................................. 27 Court Masques and Court Politics ................................................... 35 Themes of Sexuality and Gender in Chapman Criticism .................. 36 Text and Canon: Authorship, Dating and Source Material ............... 38 Radical
    [Show full text]
  • George Chapman;
    MERMAID SERIES, THE BEST TLtdYS OF THE OLD V^c4^Ic4TISTS GEORGE CHAPMAN W.L. PHELPS /J^^O. THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE ?^m^ THE mE'BJMQAIT> SERIES The Best Plays of the Old Dramatists -i" aXsX—^..|^— }<^>o-;- George Chapman THE MERMAID SERIES. THE BEST PLA YS OF THE OLD DRAMATISTS LITERAL RErKODUCTIONS OF THE OLD TEXT. THE BEST PLAYS OP CHRIS- THE COMPLETE PLAYS OF JOPHER MARLOWE. Edited, WILLIAM CONGREVE. Edited with Critical Memoir and Notes, by Alex. C. Ewald. by Havelock Ellis ; and contain- ing a General Introduction to . the Series by John Addington THE BEST OP SVMONDS. PLAYS WEB- STER and TOURNEUR. With II. an Introduction and Notes by THE BEST PLAYS of THOMAS J(jh.\ .-Xddi.ngtdn' Symonus. O'rW'AY. Introduction and Notes by the Hon. Kodex Noki.. XIII. & XIV. THE BEST PLAYS of THOMAS III. .MIDDLETON. With an Intro- THE BEST PLAYS OF JOHN duction by Alger.non Charles FORD. Edited by Havei.ock; SwiNliURNE. Ellis. IV. S; V. THE BEST PLAYS OF PHILIP THE BEST PLAYS OP JAMBS MASSINC.Kk. With Critical and SHIRLEY. With Introduction by BioRraphical Essay and Notes by Edmund Gosse. Arthur Symons. VI. THE BEST PLAYS of THOMAS of THE BEST PLAYS THOMAS DEKKER. Introductory Essay HEYWOOD. Edited by A. W. and Notes by Ernest Rhys. Verity. With Introduction by J. Symonds. Addington XVII. VII. THE BEST PLAYS OF BEN THE COMPLETE PLAYS OF JONSON. Fir.st .Series. Edited WILLIAM WVCHERLEY. by Brinsley Nicholson, M.D. Edited, with Introduction and XVIII. Notes, by W. C. Waku.
    [Show full text]
  • The Comedies of George Chapman
    This dissertation has been 64—11,003 microfilmed exactly as received NELSON, John Richard, 1932- THE COMEDIES OF GEORGE CHAPMAN. The University of Oklahoma, Ph.D., 1964 Language and Literature, general University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE THE COMEDIES OF GEORGE CHAPMAN A DISSERTATION SUBOTTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY JOHN RICHARD NELSON Norman, .Oklahoma 1964 THE COMEDIES OF GEORGE CHAPMAN APPROVED BY DISSERTATION COmHTTEE TABLE OF COOTEÎfTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION............................................... 1 II. THE BLIND BEGGAR OF ALEXANDRIA................................. 11 III. AN HUMOUROUS DAY’S MI R T H ...................................... 38 IV. ALL FOOLS ................................................. 73 V. MAY D A Y ................................................. 120 VI. SIR GILES GOOSECAP.............................................143 VII. THE GENTLEMANUSHER .......................................... 164 VIII. MONSIEUR D’OL I V E .............................................189 IX. THE IVIDaV'S TEARS. ........................ 208 X. CONCLUSION................ 4 " ................ 230 BIBLIOGRAPHY......................................................... 234 iix THE COMEDIES OF GEORGE CHAPMAN CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The eight comedies of George Chapman (1559?-l63^)» which form the subject of this study, were written in the relatively short period of time from about 1596 to
    [Show full text]
  • Select Bibliography
    Select Bibliography Astington, John H. “Playing the Man: Acting at the Red Bull and the Fortune,” Early Theatre 9 (2006): 130–43. Baldwin, T. W. Shakspere’s Love’s Labor’s Won: New Evidence from the Account Books of an Elizabethan Bookseller. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1957. Bawcutt, N. W., ed., The Control and Censorship of Caroline Drama: The Records of Sir Henry Herbert, Master of the Revels. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996. Beckerman, Bernard. Shakespeare at the Globe, 1599–1609. New York: Macmillan, 1962. Bentley, G. E. The Jacobean and Caroline Stage. 7 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1956. Bentley, G. E. The Profession of Dramatist in Shakespeare’s Time. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971. Carnegie, David, and Gary Taylor, eds. The Quest for Cardenio. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Chambers, E. K. The Elizabethan Stage. 4 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1923, rpt. 1974. Fleay, F. G. A Biographical Chronicle of the English Drama, 1559–1642. 2 vols. London: Reeves & Turner, 1891. Foakes, R. A., ed. Henslowe’s Diary. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Gadd, Ian. “The Use and Misuse of Early English Books Online,” Literature Compass 6:3 (2009): 680–92. Gair, Reavley. The Children of Paul’s: The Story of a Theatre Company, 1553–1608. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982. Greg, Walter W., ed. Henslowe’s Diary, Part I. Text. London: A. H. Bullen, 1904. Greg, Walter W., ed. Henslowe’s Diary, Part II. Commentary. London: A. H. Bullen, 1908. Greg, Walter W. A Bibliography of the English Printed Drama. 4 vols. London: Bibliographical Society, 1939–1959.
    [Show full text]
  • George Chapman
    PEOPLE MENTIONED IN WALDEN PEOPLE MENTIONED IN WALDEN: GEORGE CHAPMAN “NARRATIVE HISTORY” AMOUNTS TO FABULATION, THE REAL STUFF BEING MERE CHRONOLOGY “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project The People of Walden HDT WHAT? INDEX THE PEOPLE OF WALDEN: GEORGE CHAPMAN PEOPLE MENTIONED IN WALDEN WALDEN: As Chapman sings,– PEOPLE OF “The false society of men– WALDEN –for earthly greatness All heavenly comforts rarefies to air.” And when the farmer has got his house, he may not be the richer but the poorer for it, and it be the house that has got him. As I understand it, that was a valid objection urged by Momus against the house which Minerva made, that she “had not made it movable, by which means a bad neighborhood might be avoided;” and it may still be urged, for our houses are such unwieldy property that we are often imprisoned rather than housed in them; and the bad neighborhood to be avoided is our own scurvy selves. I know one or two families, at least, in this town, who, for nearly a generation, have been wishing to sell their houses in the outskirts and move into the village, but have not been able to accomplish it, and only death will set them free. GEORGE CHAPMAN HDT WHAT? INDEX THE PEOPLE OF WALDEN: GEORGE CHAPMAN PEOPLE MENTIONED IN WALDEN 1513 September 25, Sunday or 27, Tuesday (Old Style):Vasco Núñez de Balboa landed at Darién and, crossing the Isthmus of Panama, became the first European to look west from a shore out across the Pacific Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Lehigh Preserve Institutional Repository
    Lehigh Preserve Institutional Repository George chapman's use of the comedy of humours Tyszkiewicz, Rita Marie 1973 Find more at https://preserve.lib.lehigh.edu/ This document is brought to you for free and open access by Lehigh Preserve. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of Lehigh Preserve. For more information, please contact [email protected]. George Chapman• s Use of the Comedy of Humou.rs by Rita Marie 'l'yszklewicz A Thesis Presented to tr1e Ci:';1(itiate Comrnittee in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts in English Lehigh University 1973 -' ,,. This thesis ls accepted and approved 1n partial fulf!,ll:nent of ti1c requirements for the degree of ~ ·- .. •p ,-) ... • ,., jl, f_1: Ma.• .,,J \,i '- ~ '·· . •. J \ .. ""' .,J • £. f'i ,.,: -- ~. ~- ,; --· Table or Contents f__ 1 __ ['_ 1111 I ,w.- ·"Vi • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • 4 .. ; .. r ! ., .. .. {fl , ! i ~ t ., II 'fl"· .. J ~ . ~ .~,;,.:J·-· ,1,:i .. {:tf' I\ 1 . ...... lt.J] ,j .... ,.,I tk oa=-·,-~ .--SK--· l ~" . '"-' l "' • • • • • • • 5i tl:i .,,,,., .. ,~~ ,,. ~ ! ·, . ! C • .. ! Ii I .. ·. i ~ ... ·r I\~ J ~ ' •~ ' I I I ' . ' ~ ~ ' ' • -----... .--...,--.c--==-=, .. "' " " • • • • • • • • • • l 8 .i, -II IV A l ·- • • • 3i, ··- • • • • • • • • • • • • ' • • • _(!.~ .. pl ~ . V tt ' ... l ' • • • • • • • .If .: •• • • ·~: •• • • • 4 E3 •. ·1 ~ r • ·l I ·, .. -·"' VI ~ ,_IC, j • GO·C'J'D 0 l fll) ... ·~· • • • • • • •• ••··. •• • • • ~)9 . L -a I ' ·, ~ f ) t ' ;'. I 1··1 () r ~ .... ....: ~ •.. r {.,_r· : VI - • • • • ... • ···- • ·•' •• •: • •• • 63 c· VI I I Cc>n J~ ll :,; 1C)n • • .f • • • ·- •• •• • •• • • •• • • • 65 Vi ta. • ;. .. • • • •• • ·-~ • •• • • •· • • •: • • • 70 ·• ' ... Abstract Th!s study ls aealgn~d to rocus attention on George ,, ' ·.l ..... ~, ~-~i dev~lop and advance .,...,.... ,·· ·1,'I,., • ,.....1,. ·.-1·' "n~ • '....... ···· ,·.• ,.'"! .J ~ betl1ar1 otiige. The comedies of' Ct1apman \,,hich are discus- ;1 :· (;' 'r !1 t.~ ! ; 1 : !1 ,.ci r, C F~ F.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapman's Humor Theory
    The Woman's College of The University of North Carolina LIBRARY COLLEGE COLLECTION Gift of Roena Virginia Galllmore Chapman's Humor Theory by Roena Virginia Gallimore A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Greensboro July, 1967 Approved b fcvt/t (Sj^ecto;tor APPROVAL SHEET This thesis has been approved by the following committee of the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of North Carolina at Greensbobo in Greensboro, North Carolina. Thesis Director Oral Examination Committee Members Date ojf Examinati*;ion ii GALLIMORE, ROENA VIRGINIA. Chapman's Humor Theory. (I967) Directed by: Dr. Joseph A. Bryant, Jr. pp. 56. The Comedy of Humors was developed near the close of the sixteenth century principally through the efforts of Ben Jonson and George Chapman. Although both men appear concurrently in the field, Jonson is generally credited with the development of this new dramatic type. His play Every Man In His Humour is considered to be the model humor comedy from which all others were derived. However, Chapman constructed and presented on stage two humor comedies before Jonson1s play was completed in 1598. Chapman first introduced the humors and humorous characters as subjects for comedy in The Blind Beggar of Alexandria. His next play An Humourous Day's Mirth, which appeared one full year before Jonson's play, introduced the new dramatic type and presented on stage all the characteristics and techniques of the humor comedy as later developed by Jonson.
    [Show full text]
  • Porteousj.Pdf (PDF, 3.083Mb)
    Versions of contemporary London staged in Westward Ho (1604), Eastward Ho (1605), and Northward Ho (1605). Submitted by Jim Porteous to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English August 2020 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: ………………………………………………………….. 1 Abstract My thesis researches, for the first time, the dialectical relationships between a cluster of plays performed at indoor playhouses in London immediately following the 1603-04 plague, in a capital radically impacted by population loss. These relationships are examined through an analysis of how the plays produce different versions of contemporary London and the degrees to which these are unlicensed or regulated. Building on the theoretical writings of de Certeau and the anthropologist Tim Ingold, I identify how versions of London are produced through the scope and significance of characters’ movements, through phenomenological and topographical excess, and through opportunities and agency afforded to women. In uncovering the playwrights’ responses to successive comedies I identify that these responses were increasingly a reaction to state surveillance. Dekker and Webster’s Westward Ho, performed at Paul’s, stages an innovative version of an open, unregulated London. A contextual analysis explains how the drama is grounded in a metatheatrical meshwork of theatregrams and tropes from plays performed from 1598-1603 set in modern London, yet produces a startlingly new version in which women are afforded unlicensed agency to create new situations and opportunities.
    [Show full text]