DOCSLIB.ORG

Modes of Visual Biblical Interpretation in the Lutheran and Counter Reformations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modes of Visual Biblical Interpretation in the Lutheran and Counter Reformations MODES OF VISUAL BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION IN THE LUTHERAN AND COUNTER REFORMATIONS by Chloe Alice Church A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of Masters by Research with Biblical Studies Specialism. Department of Theology and Religion College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham July 2017 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The images produced by artists during the Lutheran and Counter Reformations of the sixteenth century employed different modes of visually interpreting biblical texts. In Lutheran images in Germany, there was a dedicated focus on the literal representation of biblical texts. In Counter-Reformation Italy, paintings of biblical texts often contained extraneous additions that did not appear in the biblical narratives. Building on this hypothesis, my thesis identifies and addresses this question: How do these distinctive visual exegetical strategies correlate with the groups’ conflicting understandings of the status and interpretation of the Bible? The Lutheran Reformers upheld the Bible with sole revelatory authority, fuelled by the trajectory of sola scriptura, and produced images that clearly illustrated biblical narratives and incorporated textual references from the Bible. Contrastingly, the Counter-Reformists in Italy understood that it was ‘scripture and tradition’ that determined the rules of Christian faith and paintings can be seen to incorporate narrative additions to sustain the Church’s traditions and doctrines. Through the in-depth analysis of visual case studies from the two groups, this research proposes that the methods of visually interpreting biblical texts and themes are representative of the Lutheran understanding of sola scriptura and the Counter-Reformation position of ‘scripture and tradition’. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the College of Arts and Law at the University of Birmingham for its generous provision of a Masters Level Scholarship, which has financed the entirety of this degree. It means a great deal to have my research academically and financially recognised by the College. I thank my primary supervisor Dr Karen Wenell from the department of Theology and Religion. Karen has supported me throughout my last four years at the University of Birmingham during my undergraduate and postgraduate studies, and has helped me establish an excellent grounding in the reception- historical methodology of this thesis. Her continuing support and interest in my studies is greatly appreciated. I would also like to acknowledge the guidance of my secondary supervisor, Dr Elizabeth L’Estrange from the department of Art History, Curating and Visual Studies. Elizabeth helped me immeasurably in establishing a contextual grounding on the images discussed in this thesis. CONTENTS 1 1. Introduction 1.1 Methodology 4 1.1.1 Reception history: roots, definition and contribution 5 1.1.2 Reception history of the Bible in the visual arts 9 1.2 Biblical interpretation in the context 14 1.2.1 Lutheran Reformation: sola scriptura 15 1.2.2 Counter-Reformation: scripture and tradition 22 1.3 Outline 26 Part I 31 2. The understanding and utility of images in the Lutheran 32 Reformation 2.1 The challenge of Protestantism: Andreas Karlstadt, Ulrich Zwingli, 34 and John Calvin on the use of images 2.2 Martin Luther on the use of images 39 3. Case Study 1: Lucas Cranach the Elder, Whore of Babylon, 1522 46 3.1 The text in image 49 3.2 The visual interpretation in context 54 4. Case Study 2: Lucas Cranach the Younger, Weimar Altarpiece, 59 1555 4.1 The text in image 62 4.2 The visual interpretation in context 65 Part II 72 5. The understanding and utility of images in the Counter-Reformation 73 5.1 Council of Trent 74 5.2 Veronese’s Feast in the house of Levi, 1573 79 6. Case Study 3: Federico Barocci, Deposition, 1569 85 6.1 The text in image 87 6.2 The visual interpretation in context 90 7. Case Study 4: Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio, The Incredulity 95 of Saint Thomas, 1602-3 7.1 The text in image 97 7.2 The visual interpretation in context 101 Conclusion 107 Images 113 Bibliography 134 LIST OF IMAGES Figure 1 Lucas Cranach the Elder, The Whore of Babylon, September Testament, 1522. Woodcut. https://commons.wikimedia.org……………………………………….113 Figure 2 Lucas Cranach the Elder, Christ Washes the Feet of his Disciples, Passional of Christi and Antichrist, 1521. Woodcut. http://germanhistorydocs.ghidc.org…….…………………………….114 Figure 3 Lucas Cranach the Elder, The Whore of Babylon, December Testament, 1522. Woodcut. http://www.smu.edu…………………………………………………….115 Figure 4 Albrecht Dürer, The Whore of Babylon, Apocalypse, 1498. Woodcut. https://commons.wikimedia.org……………………………………….116 Figure 5 Lucas Cranach the Elder, The Law and the Gospel, 1529. Oil on wood, 82.2x118cm, Schlossmuseum, Gotha. https://www.khanacademy.org………………………………………….117 Figure 6 Lucas Cranach the Elder, Schneeberg Altarpiece, 1539. Oil on wood, Church of Saint Wolfgang, Schneeberg. http://www.wga.hu………………………..………………………….…..118 Figure 7 Lucas Cranach the Younger, Weimar Altarpiece, 1555. Oil on panel, 370x309cm, Saint Peter and Paul’s Church, Weimar. https://commons.wikimedia.org………………… ……………….…...119 Figure 8 Sebastiano Del Piombo, The Martyrdom of St. Agatha, 1520. Oil on canvas. Palazzo Pitti, Florence. http://www.christianiconography.info…………………….…………….120 Figure 9 Rosso Fiorentino, Dead Christ with Angels, 1525-1526. Oil on canvas. 133.5x104cm, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. https://commons.wikimedia.org…………..…………………………….121 Figure 10 Michelangelo, The Last Judgement, 1537-41. Fresco, 1370x1200cm, Sistine Chapel, Vatican City. http://totallyhistory.com……………………………………….………….122 Figure 11 Paolo Veronese, Feast in the House of Levi, 1573. Oil on canvas, 5.55x13m, Gallerie dell’Accademia, Venice. https://www.khanacademy.org………………………………………….123 Figure 12 Jacob Tintoretto, Last Supper, 1592-4. Oil on canvas, 365x568cm, Basilica di San Giorgio Maggiore, Venice. https://sites.google.com………………………………………………….124 Figure 13 Federico Barocci, The Communion of the Apostles, 1608. Oil on canvas, 290x177cm, Santa Maria sopra Minerva, Rome. https://upload.wikimedia.org…………………………………………….125 Figure 14 Federico Barocci, The Visitation, 1583-6. Oil on canvas, 285x187cm, Santa Maria in Vallicella (Chiesa Nuova), Rome. https://culturespectator.com…………………………………………….126 Figure 15 Federico Barocci, The Deposition, 1568-9. Oil on canvas, 232x412cm, Cathedral of San Lorenzo, Perugia. https://culturespectator.com…………………………………………….127 Figure 16 Caravaggio, The Taking of Christ, 1602-3. Oil on canvas, 134x170cm, National Gallery of Ireland, Dublin. https://commons.wikimedia.org…………………………………………128 Figure 17 Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio, The Incredulity of Saint Thomas, 1602-3. Oil on canvas, 107x146cm, Sansocci Gallery, Potsdam. https://en.wikipedia.org…………………….…………………………….129 Figure 18 Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio, Conversion on the way to Damascu,s 1601. Oil on canvas, 230x175cm, Basilica of Santa Maria del Popolo, Rome. https://en.wikipedia.org………………………….……………………….130 Figure 19 Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio, Supper at Emmaus, 1601. Oil on canvas, 141x196.2cm, National Portrait Gallery, London. http://www.artway.eu……………………………………………………..131 Figure 20 Albrecht Dürer, The Disbelieving Thomas, The Little Passion, 1510. Woodcut. http://www.zeno.org………………………………………………………132 Figure 21 Francesco de Rossie Salviati, Doubting Thomas, 1547. Oil on canvas, 275x234cm, San Giovanni Decollato, Rome. https://commons.wikimedia.org………………..……………………….133 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION This thesis unites two conversations relevant to the splintering of the Christian Church in sixteenth-century Europe. The first is the diverging beliefs regarding the status and interpretation of the Bible. Martin Luther (1483-1546) and the Protestant Reformers upheld the Bible with sole revelatory authority and challenged the infallibility of Church tradition and papacy, while the Catholic Church maintained the position that it was by the synergy of the Bible and historical ecclesiastic traditions that we received God’s revelation. The Bible was thus read and interpreted in different ways, by the idea of sola scriptura or through the lens of ‘scripture and tradition’. The second conversation regards the use of images during the period. The use and veneration of images instituted by the Catholic Church was variably challenged by Protestant Reformers. While most claimed that Catholicism’s use of images was idolatrous, some saw that images could be reformed and put to positive use. Luther was one of these individuals and believed that images could be incorporated and used for the benefits of his campaign, so long as they were solely confined within educational parameters. Confronted with these varying levels of challenge towards their production of images, the Catholic Church remained consistent with their intention to use images for educational and devotional benefits. In combining these two issues and analysing their
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Law and Gospel Article
    RENDER UNTO RAWLS: LAW, GOSPEL, AND THE EVANGELICAL FALLACY Wayne R. Barnes∗ I. INTRODUCTION Many explicitly Christian voices inject themselves frequently and regularly into the current public policy and political discourse. Though not all, many of these Christian arguments proceed in something like the following manner. X is condemned (or required) by God, as revealed in the Bible. Therefore, the explicitly-required “Christian position” on X is for the law to prohibit or limit the activity (or require it), in accordance with the advocate’s interpretation of biblical ethical standards. To be clear, I mean to discuss only those scenarios where a Christian publicly identifies a position as being mandated by Christian morality or values --- i.e., where the public is given a message that some law or public policy is needed in order to comply with the Christian scriptures or God’s will. That is, in short, this article is about explicit political communications to the public in overt religious language of what Christianity supposedly requires for law and policy. As will be seen, these voices come quite famously from the Christian Religious Right, but they come from the Religious Left as well. Political philosophers (most famously John Rawls) have posited that pluralism and principles of liberal democracy strongly counsel against resort to such religious views in support of or against any law or public policy.1 That is, in opposition to this overt religious advocacy in the political realm (though, it should be noted, not necessarily taking a substantive position on the issues, per se) is the position of Rawlsian political liberalism, which states generally that, all things being equal, such inaccessible religious arguments should not be made, but rather arguments should only be made by resort to “public reason” which all find to be accessible.2 Christian political voices counter that this results in an intolerable stifling of their voice, of requiring that they “bracket” ∗ Professor, Texas Wesleyan University School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus by Philip Schaff About ANF01
    ANF01. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus by Philip Schaff About ANF01. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus by Philip Schaff Title: ANF01. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus URL: http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.html Author(s): Schaff, Philip (1819-1893) Publisher: Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library Description: The Ante-Nicene Christian library is meant to comprise translations into English of all the extant works of the Fathers down to the date of the first General Council held at Nice in A.D. 325. The sole provisional exception is that of the more bulky writings of Origen. It is intended at present only to embrace in the scheme the Contra Celsum and the De Principiis of that voluminous author; but the whole of his works will be included should the undertaking prove successful. Publication History: Text edited by Rev. Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson and first published in Edinburgh, 1867. Additional introductionary material and notes provided for the American edition by A. Cleveland Coxe 1886. Print Basis: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, reprint 2001 Source: Logos Research Systems, Inc. Rights: Public Domain Date Created: 2002-10 Status: Proof reading, ThML markup and subject index for Version 3.0 by Timothy Lanfear General Comments: Hebrew and Greek were checked against page scans of the 1995 Hendrickson reprint by SLK; errors in the hard copy have not been corrected in this digitized text. Contributor(s): Timothy Lanfear (Markup) CCEL Subjects: All; Early Church; Classic; Proofed; LC Call no: BR60 LC Subjects: Christianity Early Christian Literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer
    Edinburgh Research Explorer 'Dating the Death of Jesus' Citation for published version: Bond, H 2013, ''Dating the Death of Jesus': Memory and the Religious Imagination', New Testament Studies, vol. 59, no. 04, pp. 461-475. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688513000131 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1017/S0028688513000131 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: New Testament Studies Publisher Rights Statement: © Helen Bond, 2013. Bond, H. (2013). 'Dating the Death of Jesus': Memory and the Religious Imagination. New Testament Studies, 59(04), 461-475doi: 10.1017/S0028688513000131 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 Dating the Death of Jesus: Memory and the Religious Imagination Helen K. Bond School of Divinity, University of Edinburgh, Mound Place, Edinburgh, EH1 2LX [email protected] After discussing the scholarly preference for dating Jesus’ crucifixion to 7th April 30 CE, this article argues that the precise date can no longer be recovered. All we can claim with any degree of historical certainty is that Jesus died some time around Passover (perhaps a week or so before the feast) between 29 and 34 CE.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feast of the Annunciation
    1 Pope Shenouda III series 5 THE FEAST OF THE ANNUNCIATION BY HIS HOLINESS AMBA SHENOUDA III, POPE AND PATRIARCH OF ALEXANDRIA AND OF THE APOSTOLIC SEE OF ALL THE PREDICATION OF SAINT MARK Translated from the Arabic first edition of April 1997 Available from: http://www.copticchurch.net 2 All rights are reserved to the author His Holiness Pope Shenouda III Pope and Patriarch of the See of Alexandria and of all the Predication of the Evangelist St. Mark Name of the book: The Feast of the Annunciation Author: His Holiness Pope Shenouda III Editor: Orthodox Coptic Clerical College, Cairo First Edition: April 1997 Press: Amba Rueiss, (Offset) - The Cathedral - Abbassia Deposition number at "The Library": 97 / 475 977 - 5345 - 38 In the Name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, the One God, Amen. You will read in this pamphlet about the Annunciation of the Nativity of Christ, glory be to Him, and the annunciations which preceded and succeeded it. It is the annunciation of salvation for the world. It is the first feast of the Lord. It is an annunciation of love, because the reason of the Incarnation and Redemption is the love of God for the world. The Lord Christ has offered to us rejoicing annunciations and has presented God to us as a loving Father. What shall we then announce to people? Let there be in your mouths, all of you, a rejoicing annunciation for everybody. Pope Shenouda III 3 The feast of the Annunciation comes every year on the 29th of Baramhat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lutheran Reform and the Transformation of the Religious Image in the Arts
    Vivat Academia. Revista de Comunicación. March 15, 2019 / June 15, 2019, nº 146, 1-20 ISSN: 1575-2844 http://doi.org/10.15178/va.2019.146.1-20 RESEARCH Received: 06/11/2017 --- Accepted: 11/10/2018 --- Published: 15/03/2019 THE LUTHERAN REFORM AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE RELIGIOUS IMAGE IN THE ARTS La Reforma Luterana y la transformación de la imagen religiosa en las artes María Magdalena Ziegler1: Se habla arte. Venezuela. [email protected] ABSTRACT After 500 years of the emblematic gesture of Martin Luther in Wittenberg that would start the Protestant Reformation, it is necessary to study the place that religious images had in the new vision of Christianity from the Lutheran ideas. The significant proposal of two German artists, Albrecht Dürer and Lucas Cranach, the Elder is analyzed. From the first, a unique work, The Four Apostles, which recomposes and reconfigures the religious image from the devotional to the declarative, emphasizing the importance of the Gospel and the word in religious artistic expression. And, of the second, two works that finish sealing the new place that will occupy the religious images in the Lutheran Church, Law and Gospel and Christ blessing the children, with which Cranach approaches the Lutheran preaching and a vision of the religious set of images most linked to the Scriptures. However, in both cases, the demystification of the religious image is remarkable, as long as it takes the place of support for the preaching, avoiding acting as its substitute. The reconfiguration of the religious image that places it in a sphere different from that of the Christian tradition initiated with the official stipulations of the Second Council of Nicaea is analyzed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Excellence of the Knowledge of Jesus Christ"
    "THE EXCELLENCE OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF JESUS CHRIST" Philippians 3:8 INTRODUCTION 1. Prior to his conversion to Jesus Christ, the apostle Paul was on the "fast track", a "rising star" in the religion of Judaism - cf. Ga 1: 13-14; Ph 3:4-6 2. But once he came to know who Jesus Christ really was, all the power, all the prestige, all the position of influence that he once had, meant nothing - cf. Ph 3:7-8 3. What mattered now was for him to "know Jesus Christ": "...I also count all things loss for the excellence of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord..." (Ph 3:8) 4. What is there about the knowledge of Jesus Christ that makes it so desirable for people like Paul and countless others? And should we desire this "knowledge," how do we gain it? [To answer these questions, let's first make some observations about...] I. THE KNOWLEDGE OF JESUS CHRIST THAT IS "EXCELLENT" A. IT MUST BE A "PERSONAL" KNOWLEDGE... 1. We cannot come to know Jesus solely through another person's acquaintance with Him 2. While we may initially learn about Jesus from others, especially the authors of the New Testament, we must come to know Him for ourselves a. Like Paul, we must speak in the first person: "that I may know Him" (Ph 3:10) b. The "faith of our fathers" must become OUR faith, for God does not have any "grandchildren" B. IT MUST BE AN "INTELLIGENT" KNOWLEDGE... 1. Jesus does not expect us to commit "intellectual suicide" to know Him, He desires us to use our minds as well - Mt 22:37 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Origins of Antisemitism
    THE HISTORICAL ORIGINS OF ANTISEMITISM …Let me give you my honest advice. First, their synagogues or churches should be set on fire, and whatever does not burn up should be covered or spread over so that no one may ever be able to see a cinder of it. And this ought to be done for the honor of God and Christianity… (Martin Luther, 1543) When Wilhelm Marr, a 19th Century German journalist, coined the term antisemitism, he was giving a new expression to a very old hatred. Antisemitism, the hatred of Jews and Judaism, has roots of ancient origin, pre-dating the Christian era and evolving throughout the Middle Ages into the modern era. Throughout their history, Jews have been the victims of a persistent pattern of persecution, culminating finally in the 20th Century in mass murder. The term denoting hatred of the Jews – antisemitism – is spelled here and hereafter unhyphenated and in the lower case. This spelling is more historically and etymologically correct since “Semitic” refers not to a race of people, as Marr and other racists of his time wrongly believed, but to a group of languages which includes Arabic as well as Hebrew. Hence, the oft-used spelling “anti-Semitism” means, literally, a prejudice against Semitic-speaking people, not the hatred of people adhering to the Jewish religion and culture. ANTISEMITISM DURING THE PRE-CHRISTIAN ERA Expressions of anti-Jewish prejudice appeared as early as the 4th Century B.C.E. in Greece and Egypt, whose people drew stark distinction between themselves and others, whom they regarded as “strangers,” “foreigners,” or “barbarians.” Jewish religious practice, based as it was on an uncompromising monotheism and strict adherence to their religious laws and social customs, only heightened endemic suspicions and excited hostility in societies already prone to ethnocentric excess.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ICONOGRAPHY of MEXICAN FOLK RETABLOS by Gloria Kay
    The iconography of Mexican folk retablos Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Giffords, Gloria Fraser, 1938- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 03/10/2021 20:27:37 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/552047 THE ICONOGRAPHY OF MEXICAN FOLK RETABLOS by Gloria Kay Fraser Giffords A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ART In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS WITH A MAJOR IN HISTORY OF ART In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 6 9 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manu­ script in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: Robert M.
    [Show full text]
  • Is There a Judeo-Christian Tradition?
    Is there a Judeo-Christian Tradition? Perspectives on Jewish Texts and Contexts Edited by Vivian Liska Editorial Board Robert Alter, Steven E. Aschheim, Richard I. Cohen, Mark H. Gelber, Moshe Halbertal, Geoffrey Hartman, Moshe Idel, Samuel Moyn, Ada Rapoport-Albert, Alvin Rosenfeld, David Ruderman, Bernd Witte Volume 4 Is there a Judeo-Christian Tradition? A European Perspective Edited by Emmanuel Nathan Anya Topolski Volume inspired by the international workshop “Is there a Judeo-Christian tradition?” as part of the UCSIA/IJS Chair for Jewish-Christian Relations, organized by the Institute of Jewish Studies of the University of Antwerp and the University Centre Saint Ignatius Antwerp (UCSIA). An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. ISBN 978-3-11-041647-3 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-041659-6 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-041667-1 ISSN 2199-6962 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed
    [Show full text]
  • John 19: the Crucifixion of Jesus
    John 19: The Crucifixion of Jesus TEACHER RESOURCE hen Pilate took Jesus and had him bench in the place called Stone Pavement, in Tscourged. And the soldiers wove a crown Hebrew, Gabbatha. It was preparation day for out of thorns and placed it on his head, and Passover, and it was about noon. And he said clothed him in a purple cloak, and they came to the Jews, “Behold, your king!” They cried to him and said, “Hail, King of the Jews!” out, “Take him away, take him away! Crucify And they struck him repeatedly. Once more him!” Pilate said to them, “Shall I crucify your Pilate went out and said to them, “Look, I king?” The chief priests answered, “We have am bringing him out to you, so that you may no king but Caesar.” Then he handed him over know that I find no guilt in him.” So Jesus to them to be crucified. came out, wearing the crown of thorns So they took Jesus, and carrying the cross and the purple cloak. And he said to them, himself he went out to what is called the “Behold, the man!” When the chief priests and Place of the Skull, in Hebrew, Golgotha. There the guards saw him they cried out, “Crucify they crucified him, and with him two others, him, crucify him!” Pilate said to them, “Take one on either side, with Jesus in the middle. him yourselves and crucify him. I find no guilt Pilate also had an inscription written and put in him.” The Jews answered, “We have a law, on the cross.
    [Show full text]
  • ΚΝΙΞQUΑΊLΚΊΓΚΙΞ§ ΚΝ ΊΓΗΙΞ WORIΚ of IΞJL GRIΞCO and ΊΓΗΙΞΚR ΚΝΊΓΙΞRΙΡRΙΞΊΓΑΊΓΚΟΝ 175
    ΚΝΙΞQUΑΊLΚΊΓΚΙΞ§ ΚΝ ΊΓΗΙΞ WORIΚ Of IΞJL GRIΞCO AND ΊΓΗΙΞΚR ΚΝΊΓΙΞRΙΡRΙΞΊΓΑΊΓΚΟΝ 175 by Nicos Hadjinicolaou In memoryof Stella Panagopoulos, whose presence at the lecture gave me great pleasure The organization of a series of lectures in honour of a distinguished l art critic could bring the invited art historians in the delicate or uncomfortable position of defining the limits proper to art criticism and art history, thus reviving a rather sterile paragon of the 20th century. If, in the debate about the primacy of sculpture or of painting, Vasari (out of conviction it seems and not for reasons of tactics) declared that the controversy was futile because both arts were equally based οη "d isegno", Ι am afraid that tod ay a similar proposition to remove the object of dissent between art criticism and art history by claiming tha.t both were equally based οη "artistic theory" would, unfortunately, be rejected as being tόta11y out of place. Reconciliation being, at least for the moment, impossible, an art historian might be allowed to stress what in his eyes is one of the advantages of art criticism over art history: that it takes a stand, that it takes risks, that it measures the relevance of a work for the present and for the immediate future. It goes without saying that an art critic also jud ges a contemporary work under the burden of his or her knowledge of the art of the past and of the literature written ab out it. Υ et, this does not change the fundamental fact that the appreciation of the work and the value judgements about its assumed "quality" or "validity as a statement" are elements insid e a perspective looking towards the future and not towards the past.
    [Show full text]
  • The Defense of Monastic Memory in Bernard of Clairvaux’S
    CORRECTING FAULTS AND PRESERVING LOVE: THE DEFENSE OF MONASTIC MEMORY IN BERNARD OF CLAIRVAUX’S APOLOGIA AND PETER THE VENERABLE’S LETTER 28 A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree Master of Arts Whitney Mae Mihalik August, 2013 CORRECTING FAULTS AND PRESERVING LOVE: THE DEFENSE OF MONASTIC MEMORY IN BERNARD OF CLAIRVAUX’S APOLOGIA AND PETER THE VENERABLE’S LETTER 28 Whitney Mae Mihalik Thesis Approved: Accepted: __________________________________ _________________________________ Advisor Dean of the College Dr. Constance Bouchard Dr. Chand Midha __________________________________ _________________________________ Co-Advisor or Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Dr. Michael Graham Dr. George R. Newkome __________________________________ _________________________________ Department Chair or School Director Date Dr. Martin Wainwright ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................1 II. HISTORIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................6 III. THE REFORMS OF BENEDICTINE MONASTICISM ...............................26 IV. BERNARD’S APOLOGIA ..............................................................................32 V. PETER’S LETTER 28 .....................................................................................58 VI. CONCLUSIONS..............................................................................................81
    [Show full text]