DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix B Regional Boundaries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Appendix B: regional boundaries DfE construction framework Regional boundaries for each lot March 2019 High Value Band Northumberland Tyne & Wear Durham 1. North Cumbria North Yorkshire East Riding of Lancashire West Yorkshire Yorkshire Greater h Manchester out e y S hir se ks e r or r e i M D Y e h r s b Cheshire y m s a Lincolnshire h h ir g S e n i ta t f t fo o rd N s h ire ir h e ers d st an Norfolk Shropshire ice tl C e u a M W L R m id es re la t i b n sh ri ds n d re o g H W hi t e e s p s o k e h r rc ic m r i i e es rw a r Suffolk f t a h h e o e t r W r s r s h d d i o r r s e N B o h f i u r c d e k e e i r e O B i ir x n h h f g ds rs o h or te rd a tf Essex es s m er uc h s H lo ir h G e ir Bristol e Greater Berkshire London Wiltshire Surrey Kent Somerset Hampshire West East Sussex Sussex Devon Dorset Isle of Wight Cornwall 2. South Medium Value Band Northumberland Tyne & Wear 3. North East & Yorkshire Durham Cumbria North Yorkshire East 10. North Riding of West Lancashire West Yorkshire Yorkshire Greater h Manchester out e 4. East y S hir se ks e r or r e i M D Y Midlands e h r s b Cheshire y m s a Lincolnshire h h ir g S e n i ta t f t fo o rd N s h ire ir h e ers d st an Norfolk Shropshire ice tl C e u a M W L R m id es re la t i b n sh ri 5. East of ds n d e o g H ir t e W sh p s England e o k e h 9. West r rc ic m r i i e es rw a r Suffolk f t a h h e o e t r W r s r s Midlands h o d d i r r s e N B o h f i u r c d e k e e i r e O B i ir x n h h f g ds rs o h or te rd a tf Essex es s m er c h s H ou ir h l e ir G e Bristol Greater 6. London Berkshire London Wiltshire Surrey Kent Somerset Hampshire West East Sussex Sussex Devon Dorset Isle of Wight 7. South East Cornwall 8. South West Low Value Band 11. North East 12. Yorkshire & Northumberland the Humber 11 13. East Midlands Tyne & Wear 14. East of England A 15. East of England B Durham 16. London Cumbria 17. South East A 18. South East B North Yorkshire 19. South West A East 12 20. South West B 22 Riding of Lancashire West Yorkshire 21. West Midlands Yorkshire 22. North West Greater h Manchester out e y S hir se ks e r or r e i M D Y 13 e h r s b Cheshire y m s a Lincolnshire h h ir g S e n 14 i ta t f t fo o rd N s h ire ir h e ers d st an Norfolk Shropshire ice tl C e u a M W L R m id es re la t i b n sh ri ds n d re o g H W hi t e e s p s o k e h r rc ic m r i i 21 e es rw a r Suffolk f t a h h e o e t r W r s r s h d d i o r r s e N B o h f i u r c d e k e e i r e O B i ir x n h h f g ds rs o h or te rd a tf Essex es s m er 15 c h s H ou ir h l e ir G e Bristol Greater 16 Berkshire London Wiltshire Surrey Kent Somerset Hampshire West East 20 Sussex Sussex Devon Dorset 17 Isle of Wight 18 Cornwall 19 Local Authority High Value Band Medium Value Low Value Band Band Derby North East Midlands East Midlands Derbyshire North East Midlands East Midlands Leicester North East Midlands East Midlands Leicestershire North East Midlands East Midlands Lincolnshire North East Midlands East Midlands Nottingham North East Midlands East Midlands Nottinghamshire North East Midlands East Midlands Rutland North East Midlands East Midlands Northamptonshire North East Midlands East Midlands Darlington North North East & North East Yorkshire Hartlepool North North East & North East Yorkshire Middlesbrough North North East & North East Yorkshire Northumberland North North East & North East Yorkshire Redcar and Cleveland North North East & North East Yorkshire Stockton-on-Tees North North East & North East Yorkshire Durham North North East & North East Yorkshire Gateshead North North East & North East Yorkshire Newcastle upon Tyne North North East & North East Yorkshire North Tyneside North North East & North East Yorkshire Local Authority High Value Band Medium Value Low Value Band Band South Tyneside North North East & North East Yorkshire Sunderland North North East & North East Yorkshire Blackburn with Darwen North North West North West Blackpool North North West North West Cheshire East North North West North West Cheshire West and North North West North West Chester Cumbria North North West North West Halton North North West North West Lancashire North North West North West Warrington North North West North West Bolton North North West North West Bury North North West North West Knowsley North North West North West Liverpool North North West North West Manchester North North West North West Oldham North North West North West Rochdale North North West North West Salford North North West North West Sefton North North West North West St. Helens North North West North West Stockport North North West North West Tameside North North West North West Trafford North North West North West Wigan North North West North West Local Authority High Value Band Medium Value Low Value Band Band Wirral North North West North West Herefordshire North West Midlands West Midlands Shropshire North West Midlands West Midlands Staffordshire North West Midlands West Midlands Stoke-on-Trent North West Midlands West Midlands Telford and Wrekin North West Midlands West Midlands Warwickshire North West Midlands West Midlands Worcestershire North West Midlands West Midlands Birmingham North West Midlands West Midlands Coventry North West Midlands West Midlands Dudley North West Midlands West Midlands Sandwell North West Midlands West Midlands Solihull North West Midlands West Midlands Walsall North West Midlands West Midlands Wolverhampton North West Midlands West Midlands East Riding of Yorkshire North North East & Yorkshire and the Yorkshire Humber North East Lincolnshire North North East & Yorkshire and the Yorkshire Humber North Lincolnshire North North East & Yorkshire and the Yorkshire Humber North Yorkshire North North East & Yorkshire and the Yorkshire Humber York North North East & Yorkshire and the Yorkshire Humber Barnsley North North East & Yorkshire and the Yorkshire Humber Bradford North North East & Yorkshire and the Yorkshire Humber Local Authority High Value Band Medium Value Low Value Band Band Calderdale North North East & Yorkshire and the Yorkshire Humber Doncaster North North East & Yorkshire and the Yorkshire Humber Kingston upon Hull, City North North East & Yorkshire and the of Yorkshire Humber Kirklees North North East & Yorkshire and the Yorkshire Humber Leeds North North East & Yorkshire and the Yorkshire Humber Rotherham North North East & Yorkshire and the Yorkshire Humber Sheffield North North East & Yorkshire and the Yorkshire Humber Wakefield North North East & Yorkshire and the Yorkshire Humber Cambridgeshire South East of England East of England A Norfolk South East of England East of England A Peterborough South East of England East of England A Suffolk South East of England East of England A Bedford South East of England East of England B Central Bedfordshire South East of England East of England B Luton South East of England East of England B Essex South East of England East of England B Hertfordshire South East of England East of England B Southend-on-Sea South East of England East of England B Thurrock South East of England East of England B City of London South London London Barking and Dagenham South London London Local Authority High Value Band Medium Value Low Value Band Band Barnet South London London Bexley South London London Brent South London London Bromley South London London Camden South London London Croydon South London London Ealing South London London Enfield South London London Greenwich South London London Hackney South London London Hammersmith and South London London Fulham Haringey South London London Harrow South London London Havering South London London Hillingdon South London London Hounslow South London London Islington South London London Kensington and Chelsea South London London Kingston upon Thames South London London Lambeth South London London Lewisham South London London Merton South London London Newham South London London Redbridge South London London Richmond upon Thames South London London Local Authority High Value Band Medium Value Low Value Band Band Southwark South London London Sutton South London London Tower Hamlets South London London Waltham Forest South London London Wandsworth South London London Westminster South London London East Sussex South South East South East A Kent South South East South East A Medway South South East South East A Surrey South South East South East A West Sussex South South East South East A Brighton and Hove South South East South East A Bracknell Forest South South East South East B Buckinghamshire South South East South East B Hampshire South South East South East B Isle of Wight South South East South East B Milton Keynes South South East South East B Portsmouth South South East South East B Reading South South East South East B Slough South South East South East B Southampton South South East South East B Windsor and Maidenhead South South East South East B Wokingham South South East South East B Oxfordshire South South East South East B Berkshire South South East South East B South Gloucestershire South South West South West A Local Authority High Value Band Medium Value Low Value Band Band Bath and North East South South West South West A Somerset Bournemouth South South West South West A Bristol South South West South West A Dorset South South West South West A North Somerset South South West South West A Poole South South West South West A Somerset South South West South West A Swindon South South West South West A Wiltshire South South West South West A Gloucestershire South South West South West A Cornwall South South West South West B Devon South South West South West B Plymouth South South West South West B Torbay South South West South West B Isles of Scilly South South West South West B © Crown copyright 2019 This publication (not including logos) is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated.
Recommended publications
  • Leicester and Leicestershire City Deal

    Leicester and Leicestershire City Deal

    Leicester and Leicestershire City Deal Page | 1 Executive Summary Leicester and Leicestershire is a diverse and dynamic local economy and its success is integral to driving economic growth in the United Kingdom. The area is home to just under 1 million residents and over 32,000 businesses, many in the manufacturing and logistics sectors. Leicester and Leicestershire also benefits from its location at the heart of the UK road network and close proximity to both the second largest freight handling airport in the UK and London. The area provides employment for 435,000 people and generates an estimated gross value added of £19.4 billion. Despite these strengths Leicester and Leicestershire faces a series of challenges: more than 25,000 jobs were lost between 2008 and 2011 (nearly twice the national average); youth unemployment is relatively high within the city of Leicester and parts of the county; and whilst 70% of small and medium enterprises have plans for growth many find accessing the right type of business support is complex. Some local businesses also note difficulties in filling vacancies. As part of the area’s wider Growth Strategy the City Deal seeks to tackle these key barriers. Over its lifetime the Leicester and Leicestershire Enterprise Partnership expects that the City Deal will deliver: A new employment scheme targeted at 16-24 year olds that will reduce youth unemployment by 50% by 2018, deliver 3,000 new apprenticeships and 1,000 traineeships and work placements. An innovative new employment and training scheme for young offenders. Improved co-ordination of business support services and a range of innovative business support programmes.
  • West Midlands' Circular Economy Routemap

    West Midlands' Circular Economy Routemap

    West Midlands’ Circular Economy Routemap Kickstarting the region’s journey to a green circular revolution DRAFT FOR REVIEW Baseline 1 Analysis DRAFT FOR REVIEW West Midlands’ Circular Economy Routemap DRAFT 2 Policy Analysis International Context A policy analysis was conducted to Paris Agreement and the Nationally Determined Contributions (2016) determine which international, national and Description: The Paris Agreement sets out a global framework to regional policies support a transition to the limit global temperature rise below 2°C, with a target of 1.5°C in circular economy and what are best practice accordance with the recommendations of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Signed by 175 countries, including examples for the West Midlands region. the UK, it is the first legally binding global climate change agreement and came into force in November 2016. The circular economy is one United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (2015) method for countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. Description: The United Nations (UN) set 17 goals for sustainable Focus on Circular Economy: Low development that were adopted by UN Member states in 2015. Impact: No significant impact on circular economy. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are intended to be achieved by 2030. SDG7 Affordable and Clean Energy, SDG8 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Decent Work and Economic Growth, SDG9 Industry, Innovation and Assessment Report AR5 (2018) Infrastructure, and SDG12 Responsible Consumption and Production are particularly relevant for the Circular Economy. Description: Since the Paris Agreement the IPCC have called for increased action to achieve net zero carbon by 2030, including Focus on Circular Economy: Medium placing a higher price on emissions, shifting investment patterns, Impact: Encourages consideration of circular economy concepts and accelerating the transition to renewable energy and enabling inter-connectivity with wider development goals.
  • Central Midlands: Leicestershire, Lincolnshire and Northamptonshire Screening and Immunisation Team), May 2017

    Central Midlands: Leicestershire, Lincolnshire and Northamptonshire Screening and Immunisation Team), May 2017

    NHS England Midlands and East (Central Midlands: Leicestershire, Lincolnshire and Northamptonshire Screening and Immunisation Team), May 2017 PGD validity There has been some confusion regarding the switch from local PGD production to the adoption of PHE national template PGDs. We have had reports of practices using national template PGDs which have been download directly from the PHE webpages, and an email sent out to warn against using an un-adopted document has unfortunately led some staff to believe that the recently supplied antenatal pertussis PGD isn’t valid. We’re sorry that this has proved confusing, but all of our communications, the information on the page above, and now on our own webpages https://www.england.nhs.uk/mids- east/our-work/ll-immunisation/, as well as in the documents themselves (template and adopted version) include wording that distinguishes between the two and spells out the legal position. Hopefully the following information will provide the necessary clarification: National templates are just that – templates. They are not PGDs, and cannot be used unless they have been authorised and adopted for use by an organisation legally permitted to do this. They are Word documents into which local text can be added to allow local authorisation to take place. Without this authorisation a non-prescribing registered health care professional would effectively be prescribing and therefore acting illegally should they administer a vaccination using the template. NHS England is able to adopt PGDs for local use. The PGD must clearly state: o the name of the authorising organisation o on whose behalf it has been authorised (i.e.
  • Foundation Priority Programmes South

    Foundation Priority Programmes South

    Foundation Priority Programmes West Midlands South Thank you for your interest in the Foundation Priority Programmes available in WM South. We have 15 programmes available offering experience in Medical Education, Leadership and Digital Innovation. I hope you will find the information below helpful and hope to see you working in WM South in August 2021. Further information regarding Foundation Priority programmes, including the application process can be found on the UKFPO website https://foundationprogramme.nhs.uk/programmes/2-year- foundation-programme/foundation-priority-programme-2/ The following table give an overview of the programmes we are offering in WM South. Employing Organisation FPP Post and Incentives Hereford County Hospital, Wye Valley x3 Education Foundation Posts NHS Trust ➢ Postgraduate Certificate in Education at F2 ➢ 80% clinical and 20% education at F2 University Hospitals Coventry and x6 Leadership Foundation Posts Warwickshire (UHCW), George Eliot ➢ Linked to Leadership Programme Hospital and South Warwickshire NHS ➢ Quality Improvement Project (QIP) Foundation Trust ➢ Peer Support and Management ➢ Undertaken during the F2 year x6 Digital Health Innovation Posts ➢ Links with Local Universities ➢ Develop skills for Delivering Care in a Digital World ➢ Six Workshops, Evaluative Project and Mentoring ➢ Course Certificate and Associate Membership of Faculty of Clinical Informatics ➢ Undertaken during the F1 year Education Foundation posts – Wye Valley NHS Trust – Hereford Hospital Following successful completion of
  • East Midlands Global Gateway East Midlands Airport East Midlands Vision 2040

    East Midlands Global Gateway East Midlands Airport East Midlands Vision 2040

    EAST MIDLANDS GLOBAL GATEWAY EAST MIDLANDS AIRPORT EAST MIDLANDS VISION 2040 East Midlands Airport will be a leading international innovation hub, connecting the region’s thriving economic network. It will create new business opportunities and up to 10,000 jobs through improved connectivity between the region’s established manufacturing and logistics sectors. Creating a distinct offer with high tech industries, advanced manufacturing and logistics at its heart, East Midlands Airport will capitalise on its location to provide a catalyst for the region to deliver a £500m development and create employment opportunities for its existing and new occupiers. g £500M Total development value j 10,000 New jobs created 2 3 MORE THAN JUST AN AIRPORT The opportunity for growth at East Midlands Airport will begin with short term interventions and developments, working towards the wholesale transformation of the airport providing a nationally significant R&D hub with access to international markets. This step change in the transformation of the airport over the next 20 years seeks to attract a diverse range of high tech and advanced manufacturing businesses as well as supporting services extending over 3m sq ft in a high quality environment and a highly connected location. 3M SQ FT Masterplan K 20 YEARS Long-term investment 4 5 THINK, MAKE, MOVE The wider Midlands region has, for centuries, been at the heart of the UK’s manufacturing and industrial success. Our future vision is for an even stronger economy, with a Midlands Engine that powers the UK and links it to the rest of the world. This opportunity is now here.
  • A Science & Innovation Audit for the West Midlands

    A Science & Innovation Audit for the West Midlands

    A Science & Innovation Audit for the West Midlands June 2017 A Science & Innovation Audit for the West Midlands Contents Foreword 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 2. Economic and research landscape .................................................................................... 4 3. The West Midlands SIA Framework ................................................................................. 15 4. Innovation Ecosystem ....................................................................................................... 18 5. Enabling Competencies .................................................................................................... 38 6. Market Strengths ................................................................................................................ 49 7. Key findings and moving forward .................................................................................... 73 Annex A: Case Studies ........................................................................................................ A-1 www.sqw.co.uk A Science & Innovation Audit for the West Midlands Foreword In a year of change and challenge on other fronts, this last year has also been one of quiet revolution. This year has seen a dramatic increase across the UK in the profile of science and innovation as a key driver of productivity and its potential to improve the way our public services are delivered. The potential has always
  • Orchard House, West Worthing, West Sussex, Bn11 4Pu Worthing Office 01903 216219 | Worthing@Winkworth.Co.Uk

    Orchard House, West Worthing, West Sussex, Bn11 4Pu Worthing Office 01903 216219 | [email protected]

    ORCHARD HOUSE, WEST WORTHING, WEST SUSSEX, BN11 4PU WORTHING OFFICE 01903 216219 | [email protected] AN INCREDIBLE OPPORTUNITY TO PURCHASE A MOST DESIREABLE HOME THAT IN OUR OPINION TICKS ALL THE BOXES. Orchard House is a hidden gem To the rear of the property is a representing an incredible superb kitchen diner with clearly opportunity to purchase a most defined areas for seating and desirable home that has it all. The cooking with a large central island property sits at the end of a surrounded by a recently refitted private lane in approximately kitchen. Off of the kitchen is a quarter of an acre of gardens with useful boot room with side access a very private feel yet moments which in turn leads to a partially from local amenities. The house is converted integral garage and a Arts and Crafts style believed built utility room with a shower and W.C in the early 1930's sitting central plus space for a washing machine. to the picturesque plot. Internally To the first floor are four double the two floors of interiors are both bedrooms all with different aspects spacious and bright with well the second largest having a step balanced accommodation. down en suite shower room and The ground floor has an inviting the master a triple aspect with a entrance hall with original beautiful en suite and separate paneling and glazed doors giving dressing area. views over the garden. The Externally the gardens are of a reception room is dual aspect with superb size with a large graveled a welcoming Inglenook fireplace drive leading to a double car port housing a wood burner, the second with separate workshop.
  • The Concept of Identity in the East Midlands of England NATALIE

    The Concept of Identity in the East Midlands of England NATALIE

    The Concept of Identity in the East Midlands of England NATALIE BRABER Investigating feelings of identity in East Midlands adolescents Introduction When considering dialectal variation in the UK, linguists have frequently considered the North/South divide and the linguistic markers separating the two regions (see for example Trudgill, 1999; Wells, 1986). But it has been noted that this is not a straightforward division (e.g. Beal, 2008; Goodey, Gold, Duffett & Spencer, 1971; Montgomery, 2007; Wales, 2002). There are clear stereotypes for the North and South – but how do areas like the East Midlands fit into the picture? The boundaries between North and South are defined in different ways. Beal’s linguistic North does not include the East Midlands (Beal, 2008: 124- 5), neither does Wales’ (2002: 48). Trudgill states that in traditional dialectology the East Midlands area falls under ‘Central’ dialects, which come under the ‘Southern’ branch, but in modern dialectology it falls in the ‘North’. Hughes, Trudgill and Watt (2005: 70) contains a map which has the East Midlands in the North. Linguistically, the question has been raised whether there is a clear North/South boundary (see for example Upton (2012) where it is proposed that it is a transition zone). This paper revisits this question from the point of view of young people living in the East Midlands, to examine their sense of identity and whether this cultural divide is salient to them. The East Midlands is a problematic area in its definition geographically, and people may have difficulty in relating this to their own sense of identity.
  • West Midlands European Regional Development Fund Operational Programme

    West Midlands European Regional Development Fund Operational Programme

    Regional Competitiveness and Employment Objective 2007 – 2013 West Midlands European Regional Development Fund Operational Programme Version 3 July 2012 CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 – 5 2a SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS - ORIGINAL 2.1 Summary of Eligible Area - Strengths and Challenges 6 – 14 2.2 Employment 15 – 19 2.3 Competition 20 – 27 2.4 Enterprise 28 – 32 2.5 Innovation 33 – 37 2.6 Investment 38 – 42 2.7 Skills 43 – 47 2.8 Environment and Attractiveness 48 – 50 2.9 Rural 51 – 54 2.10 Urban 55 – 58 2.11 Lessons Learnt 59 – 64 2.12 SWOT Analysis 65 – 70 2b SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS – UPDATED 2010 2.1 Summary of Eligible Area - Strengths and Challenges 71 – 83 2.2 Employment 83 – 87 2.3 Competition 88 – 95 2.4 Enterprise 96 – 100 2.5 Innovation 101 – 105 2.6 Investment 106 – 111 2.7 Skills 112 – 119 2.8 Environment and Attractiveness 120 – 122 2.9 Rural 123 – 126 2.10 Urban 127 – 130 2.11 Lessons Learnt 131 – 136 2.12 SWOT Analysis 137 - 142 3 STRATEGY 3.1 Challenges 143 - 145 3.2 Policy Context 145 - 149 3.3 Priorities for Action 150 - 164 3.4 Process for Chosen Strategy 165 3.5 Alignment with the Main Strategies of the West 165 - 166 Midlands 3.6 Development of the West Midlands Economic 166 Strategy 3.7 Strategic Environmental Assessment 166 - 167 3.8 Lisbon Earmarking 167 3.9 Lisbon Agenda and the Lisbon National Reform 167 Programme 3.10 Partnership Involvement 167 3.11 Additionality 167 - 168 4 PRIORITY AXES Priority 1 – Promoting Innovation and Research and Development 4.1 Rationale and Objective 169 - 170 4.2 Description of Activities
  • WEST SUSSEX JOINT DEMENTIA STRATEGY 2020 to 2023 Developed in Partnership with West Sussex County Council and NHS Clinical Commissioning Group

    WEST SUSSEX JOINT DEMENTIA STRATEGY 2020 to 2023 Developed in Partnership with West Sussex County Council and NHS Clinical Commissioning Group

    www.westsussex.gov.uk WEST SUSSEX JOINT DEMENTIA STRATEGY 2020 TO 2023 Developed in partnership with West Sussex County Council and NHS Clinical Commissioning Group www.westsussex.gov.uk ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CONTENTS Foreword………………………………………. 3 Introduction……………………………... 4-6 • What is dementia? • Audience for the strategy • Purpose of the strategy • How we will get there • Understanding the challenge • Strategy development process • Our vision Where we are now…………………... 7-8 National & Local Pictures……….. 9-10 We are very grateful to the residents of National & Local Context…………... 11 The Economic Cost……………………. 12 West Sussex, our partners, staff and other The Dementia Well Pathway……… 13 stakeholders who were instrumental in the Preventing well section……..… 14-16 successful development of this strategy Diagnosing well section……….. 17-20 through their participation and feedback. Supporting well section……….. 23-29 Living well section……………..… 30-35 Particular thanks go to Alzheimer’s Dying well section……………….. 36-40 Society’s Chichester & Bognor Positive Thinkers, Horsham Rusty Brains and A joint strategic approach to dementia Worthing Town Cryer’s. Age UK West in West Sussex……………………… 41 Sussex’s K2 Club members, Sangam Monitoring delivery and impact Women’s Group and Carers Support West across the pathway…………….… 42 Appendices………………………..… 43-46 Sussex East Grinstead carers group. Photos here!!! 2 | West Sussex Joint Dementia Strategy 2020-23 FOREWARD With the ageing population of the county expected to rise exponentially in the next 10 years, a timely diagnosis for those with dementia is vital not only for them, but also for their family and friends. A timely diagnosis enables them to maximise control over their lives by planning ahead and accessing support to ensure that they can enjoy an active and independent life for as long as possible.
  • South East Greater London Wales East of England West

    South East Greater London Wales East of England West

    2021 REVALUATION: REGIONAL WINNERS & LOSERS Roll over the region titles below to find out These figures have been extracted from CoStar and are based on the anticipated changes in rateable values within each individual Administrative area across England and Wales. The extent of your change in rateable value will depend on the exact location of your property. Even if you are in an area where rateable values are predicted to fall, it is important to have your assessment verified, as there may still be opportunities to secure further reductions. For a detailed analysis of the likely impact of the 2021 revaluation and advice on what to do next, please contact a member of our Business Rates team. Email us at [email protected] or visit us at lsh.co.uk INDUSTRIAL REGION AVERAGE GROWTH MIN GROWTH MIN LOCATION MAX GROWTH MAX LOCATION WALES 27% 17% Blaenau Gwent 50% Neath Port Talbot GREATER LONDON 38% 34% Hackney 44% Harrow SOUTH EAST 27% 14% Dover 44% Milton Keynes EAST OF ENGLAND 31% 18% South Norfolk 44% Brentwood EAST MIDLANDS 27% 16% Derby 36% Hinckley NORTH WEST 25% 15% Barrow-In-Furness 35% Liverpool SOUTH WEST 19% 14% West Devon 27% Swindon WEST MIDLANDS 19% 14% Tamworth 26% Solihull NORTH EAST 18% 14% South Tyneside 26% Darlington YORKSHIRE 16% 11% Doncaster 21% Hull & THE HUMBER ALL UK AVG 25% OFFICE REGION AVERAGE GROWTH MIN GROWTH MIN LOCATION MAX GROWTH MAX LOCATION EAST OF ENGLAND 23% 9% Norwich 44% Watford SOUTH WEST 18% 7% Devon 41% Bristol Core GREATER LONDON 20% 5% Covent Garden 37% Sutton SOUTH EAST 25% 17% Reading Central 33%
  • A Building Stone Atlas of Leicestershire

    A Building Stone Atlas of Leicestershire

    Strategic Stone Study A Building Stone Atlas of Leicestershire First published by English Heritage April 2012 Rebranded by Historic England December 2017 Introduction Leicestershire contains a wide range of distinctive building This is particularly true for the less common stone types. In stone lithologies and their areas of use show a close spatial some parts of the county showing considerable geological link to the underlying bedrock geology. variability, especially around Charnwood and in the north- west, a wide range of lithologies may be found in a single Charnwood Forest, located to the north-west of Leicester, building. Even the cobbles strewn across the land by the includes the county’s most dramatic scenery, with its rugged Pleistocene rivers and glaciers have occasionally been used tors, steep-sided valleys and scattered woodlands. The as wall facings and for paving, and frequently for infill and landscape is formed principally of ancient volcanic rocks, repair work. which include some of the oldest rocks found in England. To the west of Charnwood Forest, rocks of the Pennine Coal The county has few freestones, and has always relied on the Measures crop out around Ashby-de-la-Zouch, representing importation of such stone from adjacent counties (notably for the eastern edge of the Derbyshire-Leicestershire Coalfield. To use in the construction of its more prestigious buildings). Major the north-west of Charnwood lie the isolated outcrops of freestone quarries are found in neighbouring Derbyshire Breedon-on-the-Hill and Castle Donington, which are formed, (working Millstone Grit), Rutland and Lincolnshire (both respectively, of Carboniferous Limestone and Triassic working Lincolnshire Limestone), and in Northamptonshire (Bromsgrove) Sandstone.