HISTORIAN STEVEN DITMYER SPEAKS on "RAILROADS, HERMAN MEMBERSHIP MEETINGS HAUPT and the BATTLE of 7 P.M
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
AMERICAN MANHOOD in the CIVIL WAR ERA a Dissertation Submitted
UNMADE: AMERICAN MANHOOD IN THE CIVIL WAR ERA A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Notre Dame in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor in Philosophy by Michael E. DeGruccio _________________________________ Gail Bederman, Director Graduate Program in History Notre Dame, Indiana July 2007 UNMADE: AMERICAN MANHOOD IN THE CIVIL WAR ERA Abstract by Michael E. DeGruccio This dissertation is ultimately a story about men trying to tell stories about themselves. The central character driving the narrative is a relatively obscure officer, George W. Cole, who gained modest fame in central New York for leading a regiment of black soldiers under the controversial General Benjamin Butler, and, later, for killing his attorney after returning home from the war. By weaving Cole into overlapping micro-narratives about violence between white officers and black troops, hidden war injuries, the personal struggles of fellow officers, the unbounded ambition of his highest commander, Benjamin Butler, and the melancholy life of his wife Mary Barto Cole, this dissertation fleshes out the essence of the emergent myth of self-made manhood and its relationship to the war era. It also provides connective tissue between the top-down war histories of generals and epic battles and the many social histories about the “common soldier” that have been written consciously to push the historiography away from military brass and Lincoln’s administration. Throughout this dissertation, mediating figures like Cole and those who surrounded him—all of lesser ranks like major, colonel, sergeant, or captain—hem together what has previously seemed like the disconnected experiences of the Union military leaders, and lowly privates in the field, especially African American troops. -
Rehabilitation of Arlington House, the Robert E. Lee Memorial South
Rehabilitation of Arlington House, the Robert E. Lee Memorial South Dependency/Slave Quarters - Discovery of a Subfloor Storage Pit Shrine Supplementary Section 106 Archeological Investigations Related to the 2017-2020 Rehabilitation Program George Washington Memorial Parkway Arlington House, the Robert E. Lee Memorial Arlington County, Virginia Matthew R. Virta, Cultural Resources Program Manager National Park Service - George Washington Memorial Parkway 2021 Cover Graphics (clockwise from upper left): Fireplace and Subfloor Pit Location, South Dependency West Room Slave Quarters, Arlington House, The Robert E. Lee Memorial – NPS Photograph by B. Krueger 2019 adapted by M. Virta, National Park Service-George Washington Memorial Parkway Drawing of Previous Archeological Excavations Showing Fireplace and Subfloor Pit Excavation Unit Illustrating Positioning of Bottles Discovered, South Dependency West Room Slave Quarters, Arlington House, The Robert E. Lee Memorial – NPS Drawing by M. Virta 2020, National Park Service-George Washington Memorial Parkway, based on Louis Berger Group, Inc. drawing and B. Krueger illustration Selina and Thornton Gray – from National Park Service Museum Management Program Exhibit, https://www.nps.gov/museum/exhibits/arho/index.html Elevation Drawings of South Dependency/Slave Quarters, Arlington House, The Robert E. Lee Memorial – National Park Service Historic American Building Survey Collections HABS VA 443A; https://www.loc.gov/item/va1924/. Rehabilitation of Arlington House, the Robert E. Lee Memorial South Dependency/Slave Quarters - Discovery of a Subfloor Storage Pit Shrine Supplementary Section 106 Archeological Investigations Related to the 2017-2020 Rehabilitation Program Virginia Department of Historic Resources File # 2015-1056 Archeological Site # 44AR0017 George Washington Memorial Parkway Arlington House, the Robert E. -
FORT STRONG on ARLINGTON HEIGHTS by ANNE C
FORT STRONG ON ARLINGTON HEIGHTS By ANNE C. WEBB During the Civil War, Fort Strong, or DeKalb as it was first called, was an important part of the system of defenses around Washington, D.C. In all there were 68 forts around Washington, 22 in what is now Arlington County. Some 18,000 men were stationed in Arlington, a community whose normal population at the time was 1,400. 1 The fort was first named for Johann Kalb, a Revolutionary War general known as "Baron deKalb."2 He was born in Germany, but served for many years in the French Army and was sent on a secret mission to the British colo nies by the Due de Choiseul in 1768. With the outbreak of the war between Great Britain and its American colonies, he was engaged by Silas Deane as a major-general. His protege, Lafayette, was also engaged to fight for the Americans. General de Kalb died in the Battle of Camden in August 1780. 3 Fort DeKalb was renamed Fort Strong on November 4, 1863,4 after Major General George C. Strong, who had died July 30, 1863, of wounds received in an assault on Fort Wagner, Charleston harbor, S.C. General Strong was from Vermont. He had been graduated from West Point in 1857 and was only 30 when he died. 5 With the beginning of hostilities between North and South at Fort Sumter in April of 1861, the capital city of Washington was put in a very difficult position. Virginia would undoubtedly secede, leaving the Federal City facing a hostile shore without any strong natural defenses. -
Inside the Civil War Defenses of Washington: an Interview with Steve T
The Gettysburg Compiler: On the Front Lines of History Civil War Institute 12-18-2017 Inside The Civil War Defenses of Washington: An Interview with Steve T. Phan Ashley Whitehead Luskey Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/compiler Part of the Military History Commons, Public History Commons, and the United States History Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Recommended Citation Luskey, Ashley Whitehead, "Inside The Civil War Defenses of Washington: An Interview with Steve T. Phan" (2017). The Gettysburg Compiler: On the Front Lines of History. 315. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/compiler/315 This is the author's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/compiler/315 This open access blog post is brought to you by The Cupola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The Cupola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Inside The Civil War Defenses of Washington: An Interview with Steve T. Phan Abstract Over the course of this year, we’ll be interviewing some of the speakers from the upcoming 2018 CWI conference about their talks. Today we are speaking with Steve T. Phan, a Park Ranger and historian at the Civil War Defenses of Washington. Prior to his arrival at CWDW, Steve worked as an intern and park guide at Richmond National Battlefield ark,P Hopewell Culture National Historical Park, and Rock Creek Park. -
COLUMBIA PIKE - SOME HISTORY by Sara J
COLUMBIA PIKE - SOME HISTORY By Sara J. Collins and Ruth W. Stewart Early Years "The first travelways in this area were those pounded out by big game: mammoths, buffalo, and the like. The Indians used these trails and developed others of their own. In general, these were on high ground so that travelers - animal and human - could overlook the surrounding territory and watch for enemies . .. Only gradually was a system of public roads developed." 1 Columbia Pike had its beginnings in 1808 as Columbia Turnpike Road. Stimulated by the building of the Long Bridge across the Potomac (in the area of 14th Street Bridge), The Columbia Turnpike Company was chartered to build a road to join the already constructed Little River Turnpike in Fairfax County. Since Arlington County was then Alexandria County of the District of Columbia, the company was chartered by Congress. Virginia chartered a Fairfax Turnpike Company to continue the road beyond the District line. A turnpike was a major road constructed by a private company that was authorized to charge tolls for its use. These were collected at toll houses where the road was barred by a long pole or pike, which was turned to ·allow passage once the toll was paid. "That these early turnpikes were not the superhighways of today may be inferred from the stipulations the Virginia General Assembly found it necessary to lay down in 1817. Every turnpike was to be: 60 feet wide at least, eighteen feet of which shall be well covered with gravel or stone where necessary and at all times be kept firm and smooth, -
Original Photographs Taken on the Battlefields During the Civil War of the United States
^> Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from The Institute of Museum and Library Services through an Indiana State Library LSTA Grant http://www.archive.org/details/originalphotograOOeato , g_ / O ov-t sKii t Taken on the BATTLEFIELDS During the Civil War of the United States By Mathew B. Brady and Alexander Gardner Who operated under the Authority of the War Department and the Protection of the Secret Service Rare Reproductions from Photographs Selected from Seven Thousand Original Negatives Taken under Most Hazardous Conditions in the Midst of One of the Most Terrific Conflicts of Men that the World Has Ever Known, and in the Earliest Days of Photography—These Negatives Have Been in Storage Vaults for More than Forty Years and are now the rttiai? (EflUrrttfltt of lE&war& latbg iEatntt Valued at $150,000 FIRST PRESENTATION FROM THIS HISTORIC COLLECTION MADE OFFICIALLY AND EXCLUSIVELY BY THE OWNER iSartfdrti. GJonttrrtirut 19Dr COPYRIGHT 1907 BY E. U. EATON COPIES OF THIS ALBUM MAY BE OBTAINED BIT A REMITTANCE OF THREE DOLLARS TO EDWARD B. EATON HARTFORD. CONNECTICUT PUBLISHER Martyrs on Altar of Civilization IIS is undoubtedly the most valuable collection the children a pension of fifty pounds per annum on the " TI of historic photographs in America. It is be- FRANCIS TREVELYAN MILLER ground that their father was the discoverer of a scienti- lieved to be the first time that the camera was fic process of great value to the nation, from which the of American History Editor of the Journal " used so extensively and practically on the battle-field. -
AHS Newsletter 9.13
NEWSLETTER AHISTORICALrlingtong SOCIETY VOLUME 58, NO. 3 SEPTEMBER 2013 LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT Dear Fellow AHS Members: Over the course of the past year I interviewed officers of virtually all the Washington metro- politan area historical societies, private as well as taxpayer-funded. I undertook this mission IN THIS ISSUE: partly for personal edification but more importantly to get to know other laborers in the his- tory vineyard, learn more about area history, and compare/contrast AHS with area counter- EXHIBIT SHOWCASES 3 parts. Interviewees were as follows: UNION SOLDIER • Alexandria Historical Society AHS GOES TO THE 4 • Fairfax County Historical Society FAIR • Historic Fairfax City (municipal) • Historical Society of Washington FIRST-HAND LOOK 5 AT ARLINGTON • Montgomery County Historical Society POLICE WORK • Office of Historic Alexandria (municipal) NAUCK COMMUNITY 6 • Prince George County Historical Society IS RICH IN HISTORY Among multiple details, two realities stood out: 1) AHS is the only private historical society that owns and maintains real estate (Arlington Historical Museum and the Ball-Sellers House), and 2) AHS is virtually the only private group that receives no funding or other di- rect support from local taxpayers. Considering that AHS’s two historic properties are old and in constant need of maintenance, bearing the full burden of their upkeep presents a challenge to an all-volunteer organization with a limited budget. AHS and most of its regional counterparts are similar in many respects, combining a mix of lectures, publications, tours and special events. The challenges also are similar, including a limited (and often aging) membership base; relatively few new, younger members; weak income strains; small boards of directors; and no paid staff. -
The Civil War Defenses of Washington
A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices United States Department of Interior National Park Service National Capital Region Washington, DC Contract No. 144CX300096053 Modification# 1 Prepared by CEHP, Incorporated Chevy Chase, Maryland A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defens es of Washington Part I Appendices Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Forts, Batteries, and Blockhouses Appendix B: Alphabetical Listing of Known Fortification Owners, Their Representatives, and Fortifications on Their Land Appendix C: Naming of Forts Appendix D: Correspondence Concerning Appropriations for the Defenses of Washington Appendix E: General Reports about the Defenses Appendix F: Supplement to Commission Report Appendix G: Mostly Orders Pertaining to the Defenses of Washington Appendix H: A Sampling of Correspondence, Reports, Orders, Etc., Relating to the Battle of Fort Stevens Appendix I: Civil War Defenses of Washington Chronology Bibliography Appendix A. Alphabetical Listing of Forts,. Batteries, and Blockhouses Civil War Defenses of Washington Page A-1 Historic Resources Study Part I-Appendix A Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Forts, Batteries, and Blockhouses Fortification Known Landowner or their Representative Fort Albany James Roach and heirs, J.R. Johnson Battery Bailey Shoemaker family Fort Baker · Sarah E. Anderson, Ann A.C. Naylor & Susan M. Naylor Fort Barnard Philip J. Buckey, Sewall B. Corbettt Fort Bennett Wm. B. Ross, Attorney John H. Bogue, B.B. Lloyd Fort Berry Sewall B. Corbettt Blockhouse south of Fort Ellsworth Elizabeth Studds' heirs, George Studds Blockhouse between Fort Ellsworth & Fort Lyon, also battery Henry Studds Fort Bunker Hill Henry Quinn Fort C.F. -
Arlington County Envisions Progressive New City in Near Future
- THE SUNDAY STAR. WASHINGTON, T>. C.. MAT 23. 1927-PART 2. 11 ,I‘. 1 \ J Arlington County Envisions Progressive City in ' • New Near Future I a I ' Rapid Development SCENES IN ARLINGTON COUNTY, CAPITAL’S NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR ON THE SOUTH Earl Indirectly Gave jln Homes Has ~ Name to Section ••• ** Followed. World 7“ . -t. -p.- *¦••;:***n; • * • ' In Stuart " " * .< .. War. '/V ¦ .. * Era. .... y I**" .... .. ’ Has Many Gardens. Past Aristocratic. ; Area Is Almost En- Wilderness and * tirely Suburban. Rougk Characters Industries Reigned But ) jfc Sought. Recently. *-...'1 11 BY THOMAS R. HENRY hardly can he said to he developing Arlington County, Virginia, is the as population centers. There la the Mra. 1927 of Washington’s suburbs. old village of Barcroft, on the Columbia ; Pike half between t . The gawky little girl next <loor about way the High- .Quite suddenly has stepped out as way Bridge and Annandale, in Fairfax ’• very charming young housewife County. Previous to 1910 there was who steps on the gas, cuts her hair a station there of the Washington & s ’: »hort, plays golf and tennis, puffs Ohio Railroad, later taken over by lan occasional cigarette and captures the Washington & Old Dominion, and . -the hearts of all who look upon her. a mill on Four Mile Run operated by jShe is a child of the age, delighting a Dr. Barcroft. In the latter year Jin bright colors and shattered tra- Barcroft sold the mill and a subdivi- ditions. Altogether she Is a whole- sion was financed by Mrs. Abbie O. some and energetic young lady. She Fox which has developed into the pres- ils the life of the party with such ent village. -
Lee Highway Historic and Cultural Resources Arlington County, Virginia
LEE HIGHWAY HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Prepared for: Arlington County Department of Community Planning, Housing & Development 2100 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 700, Arlington, VA 22201 Prepared by: AECOM Technical Services, Inc. 3101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 900 Arlington, Virginia 22201 Principal Author: Geoffrey Henry, M.A. Principal Investigators: Mark Edwards, M.S. Geoffrey Henry, M.A. Rebecca McGovern, B.A. Kisa Hooks, M.A. John Southern, M.A. August 2020 This Page Intentionally Blank Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On behalf of the Arlington County Department of Community Planning, Housing & Development (CPHD), AECOM Technical Services, Inc. (AECOM) of Arlington County, Virginia conducted a cultural resources survey of Lee Highway (US Route 29), in Arlington County, between January 2019 and February 2020. The Lee Highway Cultural Resources Survey is a component of the larger “Plan Lee Highway” project, a long-range plan and comprehensive vision for the Lee Highway corridor conducted by AECOM for the CPHD. The Lee Highway Cultural Resources Survey consisted of the following tasks: 1) Meetings; 2) Background Research; 3) Field Investigation; and 4) Report of Findings. The survey was conducted by AECOM’s Secretary of the Interior (SOI)-qualified architectural historians, who attended numerous in- person and telephone meetings with CPHD staff as well as three public meetings, and submitted weekly progress reports to the CPHD during the field work phase. Working with both CPHD staff and the general public, AECOM developed a list of 120 resources (buildings, structures, objects, and sites) within the Plan Lee Highway study area to be researched, surveyed, and documented either at the reconnaissance level (105) or in-depth level (15). -
The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices
A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices United States Department of Interior National Park Service National Capital Region Washington, DC Contract No. 144CX300096053 Modification# 1 Prepared by CEHP, Incorporated Chevy Chase, Maryland A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defens es of Washington Part I Appendices Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Forts, Batteries, and Blockhouses Appendix B: Alphabetical Listing of Known Fortification Owners, Their Representatives, and Fortifications on Their Land Appendix C: Naming of Forts Appendix D: Correspondence Concerning Appropriations for the Defenses of Washington Appendix E: General Reports about the Defenses Appendix F: Supplement to Commission Report Appendix G: Mostly Orders Pertaining to the Defenses of Washington Appendix H: A Sampling of Correspondence, Reports, Orders, Etc., Relating to the Battle of Fort Stevens Appendix I: Civil War Defenses of Washington Chronology Bibliography Appendix A. Alphabetical Listing of Forts,. Batteries, and Blockhouses Civil War Defenses of Washington Page A-1 Historic Resources Study Part I-Appendix A Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Forts, Batteries, and Blockhouses Fortification Known Landowner or their Representative Fort Albany James Roach and heirs, J.R. Johnson Battery Bailey Shoemaker family Fort Baker · Sarah E. Anderson, Ann A.C. Naylor & Susan M. Naylor Fort Barnard Philip J. Buckey, Sewall B. Corbettt Fort Bennett Wm. B. Ross, Attorney John H. Bogue, B.B. Lloyd Fort Berry Sewall B. Corbettt Blockhouse south of Fort Ellsworth Elizabeth Studds' heirs, George Studds Blockhouse between Fort Ellsworth & Fort Lyon, also battery Henry Studds Fort Bunker Hill Henry Quinn Fort C.F. -
Western Rosslyn Area Planning Study Briefing Book
Western Rosslyn Area Planning Study Briefing Book A Resource for the Western Rosslyn Area Planning Study DRAFT - JULY 2013 ARLINGTON COUNTY I DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING, HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT I PLANNING DIVISION DRAFTPREFINAL DRAFTPREFINAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND CREDITS TABLE OF CONTENTS Arlington County Board TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction . 1 J. Walter Tejada, Chairman II. Existing Conditions . 7 Jay Fisette, Vice-Chairman Mary Hynes, Member . A. Study Area Location and Regional Context. 7 Libby Garvey, Member . B. Historic and Cultural Resources . 14 Christopher Zimmerman, Member . C. Transportation and Access . 17 . D. Parks and Open Space . 21 Arlington County Staff . E. Land Use and Development . 24 Claude Williamson, DCPHD . F. Demographics. 28 Richard Tucker, DCPHD . G. Economic and Market Data. 31 Margaret Rhodes, DCPHD . H. Housing Characteristics . 33 Kellie Brown, DCPHD III.Plans, Policies, and Laws. 36 Andrew D’huyvetter, DCPHD . A. The General Land Use Plan . 36 Mike Saunders, DES . B. General Land Use Plan History. 41 . C. Zoning Ordinance . 46 . D. Master Transportation Plan . 48 . E. Public Spaces Master Plan. 52 . F. Public Art Master Plan . 54 . G. Historic Preservation Master Plan . 55 . H. Neighborhood Conservation . 56 . I. Capital Projects ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 57 . J. Rosslyn Station Area Plan Addendum (1992) . 58 . K. Rosslyn Transit