DOCSLIB.ORG

Transparency Report 2020 (Part 2) | Ernst & Young Accountants

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Transparency Report 2020 Part 2 Ernst & Young Accountants LLP Ernst & Young Accountants LLP 1 | Transparency Report 2019 – 2020 Part 2: Ernst & Young Accountants LLP Contents About us ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Legal structure, ownership and governance .................................................................................................. 3 Network arrangements ............................................................................................................................... 5 Commitment to Sustainable Audit Quality ....................................................................................................... 7 Infrastructure supporting quality ................................................................................................................. 7 Dutch quality and risk infrastructure ............................................................................................................ 8 Instilled professional values ....................................................................................................................... 10 Internal quality control system .................................................................................................................. 11 Client acceptance and continuance ............................................................................................................ 13 Performance of audits .............................................................................................................................. 14 Review and consultation ........................................................................................................................... 16 Rotation and long association .................................................................................................................... 18 Audit quality reviews ................................................................................................................................ 18 External quality assurance review .............................................................................................................. 21 Compliance with legal requirements ........................................................................................................... 22 Litigation ................................................................................................................................................ 24 Independence practices ............................................................................................................................... 26 Continuing education of audit professionals ................................................................................................... 29 Revenue and remuneration........................................................................................................................... 31 Financial information ................................................................................................................................ 31 Partner remuneration ............................................................................................................................... 31 Statement of th eBoard of Directors ............................................................................................................. 34 Appendix 1: List of PIE audit clients .............................................................................................................. 35 Appendix 2: List of approved EYG member firms in an EU or EEA member state ............................................... 37 Appendix 3: Biographies .............................................................................................................................. 39 Appendix 4: Key Performance Indicators ....................................................................................................... 43 Appendix 5: Glossary ................................................................................................................................... 48 2 | Transparency Report 2019 – 2020 Part 2: Ernst & Young Accountants LLP About us In Europe, there is a holding entity, EY Europe SCRL Legal structure, ownership (EY Europe). EY Europe is a Limited Liability Cooperative Company (SCRL or CVBA) incorporated in and governance Belgium. It is an audit firm registered with the Institut des Reviseurs d’Entreprises (IRE-IBR) in Belgium, but it Ernst & Young Accountants LLP (EYA) is an audit firm does not carry out audits or provide any professional operating in the Netherlands and is organized as a UK services. Limited Liability Partnership. EYA is a member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by To the extent permitted by local legal and regulatory guarantee (EYG). In this report, we refer to ourselves requirements, EY Europe has acquired or will acquire as “EYA,” “we,” “us” or “our.” EY refers collectively to voting control of the EYG member firms operating in the global organization of the member firms of EYG. Europe. EY Europe is a member firm of EYG. EY Europe acquired voting control of Ernst & Young Our firm engages in various professional activities Nederland LLP as of 29 March 2019. through the service line Assurance. The Board of Directors of EY Europe is made up of EYG member firms are grouped into three geographic senior partners of EYG member firms in Europe. It has Areas: Americas; Asia-Pacific; and Europe, Middle authority and accountability for strategy execution and East, India and Africa (EMEIA). The Areas comprise management of EY Europe. multiple Regions, which themselves consist of member firms. Ownership Our activities in the Netherlands are part of the EMEIA Our firm is owned by the private practice companies of Area, which comprises EYG member firms in 97 our partners in the Netherlands (“members”). Apart countries in Europe, the Middle East, India and Africa. from holding a stake in EYA, our members also co-own Within the EMEIA Area, there are 10 Regions. As of 1 Ernst & Young Nederland LLP, together with the July 2017, the Netherlands forms part of the WEM members of Ernst & Young Belastingadviseurs LLP and Region (Western Europe & Maghreb). This Region does the members of EY Advisory Netherlands LLP. not include the financial sectors in the WEM countries, as these industry sectors are part of the EMEIA Control Financial Services Reghio. Although Financial EY Europe obtained voting control in Ernst & Young Serrvices constitutes a separate Region within EMEIA, Nederland LLP on 29 March 2019 and therefore in this Transparency Report, we report all activities of maintains indirect control over our firm. EYA, including Financial Services with respect to The Board of Directors of EY Europe is made up of assurance in the Netherlands. senior partners of EYG member firms in Europe. It has Ernst & Young (EMEIA) Limited (EMEIA Limited), an authority and accountability for strategy execution and English company limited by guarantee, is the principal management of EY Europe. coordinating entity for the EYG member firms in the EMEIA Area. EMEIA Limited facilitates the coordination EY Europe of these firms and cooperation between them, but it does not control them. EMEIA Limited is a member firm of EYG, has no financial operations and does not Ernst & Young provide any professional services. Nederland LLP Each Region elects a Regional Partner Forum (RPF), Ernst & Young whose representatives advise and act as a sounding Ernst & Young EY Advisory Belastingadviseurs board to Regional leadership. The partner elected as Accountants LLP Netherlands LLP LLP Presiding Partner of the RPF also serves as the Region’s representative on the Global Governance Council (see page 5). 3 | Transparency Report 2019 – 2020 Part 2: Ernst & Young Accountants LLP Organization Governance of the Audit Firm • The network of EYA operates from 15 offices in The Board of Directors of EYA is responsible for the the Netherlands and comprises: reputational, financial and commercial standing of our • Ernst & Young Nederland LLP firm as cornerstones of its sustainable success. • Ernst & Young Belastingadviseurs LLP – tax Appointment procedures, time in office and other services relevant personal details of members of the Board are • EY Advisory Netherlands LLP – (transaction) published on our website. advisory services • Ernst & Young Actuarissen B.V. – actuarial The Board manages our firm’s operational and services financial effectiveness, its compliance with local and • Ernst & Young CertifyPoint B.V. - independent and international professional standards and audit impartial certification regulations, the implementation of our assurance • Ernst & Young VAT Rep B.V. – VAT representation strategy, methodology and tools, and the sufficiency • Ernst & Young Real Estate Advisory Services B.V. of our resources. – real estate investment advice and valuations • Stichting Ernst & Young Foundation – support for The members of the Board of Directors of EYA are initiatives by not-for-profit organizations appointed by Ernst & Young Nederland LLP. There are regarding sustainability and environmental issues currently seven Board members: Rob Lelieveld (Chair), • Centre B.V. - EPM services, including financial André Wijnsma (Markets), Nico Pul (Quality), Patrick consolidation, budgeting, planning and Gabriëls (Innovation), Mirjam Sijmons (Talent
Recommended publications
  • NLFI Exit Advice ASR Nederland

    NLFI Exit Advice ASR Nederland

    Exit advice ASR Nederland NL financial investments 5 November 2015 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Contents FOREWORD ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................ 4 HISTORY PARLIAMENTARY DISCUSSION OF ASR SALE ...................................................................................... 8 5 PRECONDITIONS FOR SALE ......................................................................................................................................... 8 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE SALES ADVICE AUGUST 2013 ................................................................................................... 8 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE SALES ADVICE MAY 2014 ........................................................................................................ 9 SALES READINESS AND PRICE EXPECTATION .................................................................................................. 10 RESULTS ACHIEVED AND STRATEGY OF ASR ................................................................................................................. 10 10 READINESS FOR A TRANSACTION ............................................................................................................................... 11 Financial ......................................................................................................................................................
  • Premium Thresholds for Equity Options Traded at Euronext Amsterdam Premium Based Tick Size

    Premium Thresholds for Equity Options Traded at Euronext Amsterdam Premium Based Tick Size

    Premium Based Tick Size Premium thresholds for equity options traded at Euronext Amsterdam Trading Trading Premium Company symbol symbol threshold Underlying American European €0.50 €5.00 1 Aalberts AAI x 2 ABN AMRO Bank ABN x 3 Accell Group ACC x 4 Adidas ADQ x 5 Adyen (contract size 10) ADY x 6 Aegon AGN x 7 Ageas AGA x 8 Ahold Delhaize, koninklijke AH AH9 x 9 Air France-KLM AFA x 10 Akzo Nobel AKZ x 11 Allianz AZQ x 12 Altice Europe ATC x 13 AMG AMG x 14 Aperam AP x 15 Arcadis ARC x 16 ArcelorMittal MT MT9 x 17 ASM International ASM x 18 ASML Holding ASL AS9 x 19 ASR Nederland ASR x 20 BAM Groep, koninklijke BAM x 21 Basf BFQ x 22 Bayer REG BYQ x 23 Bayerische Motoren Werke BWQ x 24 BE Semiconductor Industries BES x 25 BinckBank BCK x 26 Boskalis Westminster, koninklijke BOS x 27 Brunel International BI x 28 Coca-Cola European Partners CCE x 29 CSM CSM x 30 Daimler REGISTERED SHARES DMQ x 31 Deutsche Bank DBQ x 32 Deutsche Lufthansa AG LUQ x 33 Deutsche Post REG DPQ x 34 Deutsche Telekom REG TKQ x 35 DSM, koninklijke DSM x 36 E.ON EOQ x 37 Euronext ENX x 38 Flow Traders FLW x 39 Fresenius SE & CO KGAA FSQ x 40 Fugro FUR x 41 Grandvision GVN x 42 Heijmans HEY x 43 Heineken HEI x 44 IMCD IMD x 45 Infineon Technologies NTQ x 46 ING Groep ING IN9 x 47 Intertrust ITR x 48 K+S KSQ x 49 Kiadis Pharma KDS x 50 Klépierre CIO x 51 KPN, koninklijke KPN x 52 Marel MAR x 53 Muenchener Rueckver REG MRQ x 54 NIBC Holding NIB x 55 NN Group NN x 56 NSI NSI x 57 OCI OCI x 58 Ordina ORD x 59 Pharming Group PHA x 60 Philips Electronics, koninklijke PHI
  • Report Profundo

    Report Profundo

    Eerlijke Verzekeringswijzer Dutch Fair Insurance Guide A Case Study on Transparency & Accountability A research paper for Amnesty International, Dierenbescherming, FNV, Milieudefensie, Oxfam Novib and PAX Eerlijke Verzekeringswijzer Dutch Fair Insurance Guide A Case Study on Transparency & Accountability A research paper for Amnesty International, Dierenbescherming, FNV, Milieudefensie, Oxfam Novib and PAX Date of publication 5 July 2016 Hester Brink, Retno Kusumaningtyas, Michel Riemersma, Joeri de Wilde Naritaweg 10 1043 BX Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel: +31-20-8208320 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.profundo.nl Contents Samenvatting ............................................................................................................ i Summary ......................................................................................................... vii Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 Background ...................................................................................... 3 1.1 What is at stake? ....................................................................................... 3 1.2 Themes ...................................................................................................... 4 1.2.1 Organisation................................................................................................ 4 1.2.2 Policy .........................................................................................................
  • TLEVISA Efficiencies Limit Pressure on Margins @Analisis Fundam

    TLEVISA Efficiencies Limit Pressure on Margins @Analisis Fundam

    Equity Research M exico Quarterly Report July 13, 2020 TLEVISA www.banorte.com Efficiencies limit pressure on margins @analisis_fundam ▪ Televisa confirmed a weak report, reflecting the impact of the Consumer and Telecom pandemic on Content and Other Businesses, yet highlighting a solid growth in pay TV segment (mainly Cable) Valentín Mendoza Senior Strategist, Equity [email protected] ▪ Despite a sharp drop in Advertising, pressure on profitability was less than estimated, owing to cost and expense savings in the division, Juan Barbier coupled with a decrease in corporate spending Analyst [email protected] ▪ We establish a PT2020 of $30.00, which implies a FV/EBITDA 2021E multiple of 5.8x, similar to last year's average of 5.7x. Given the Buy Current Price $23.52 attractive valuation, our rating is BUY. PT 2020 $30.00 Dividend 2020e Pay TV proved its resilience. Televisa's revenues fell 7.8% y/y to $22.407 Dividend Yield (%) Upside Potential 27.6% billion, due to a 16.3% decrease in Content (Advertising -33.1%), and a 67.0% ADR current price US$5.18 slump in Other Business; both divisions being strongly impacted by the PT2020 ADR US$6.80 # Shares per ADR 5 pandemic. However, Pay TV even accelerated its growth rate, with Cable Max – Mín LTM ($) 47.14 – 22.70 advancing 10.7% and Sky 3.1%, due to a higher demand for broad-band Market Cap (US$m)) 2,988.5 Shares Outstanding (m) 2,820.0 accesses. EBITDA fell 13.2% y/y to $8.221 billion though the respective Float 80% margin eroded 230bp to 36.7%, yet being better than expected thanks to Daily Turnover US$m 94.7 Valuation metrics LTM efficiencies in Content and Corporate expenses, which partially cushioned the FV/EBITDA 5.4x impact of lower operating leverage coming from the sharp drop in Advertising P/E N.A.
  • Global Center of Excellence for Healthcare

    Global Center of Excellence for Healthcare

    Global Center of Excellence for Healthcare kpmg.com/healthcare KPMG INTERNATIONAL Global Center of Excellence for Healthcare Supporting clients with the very best minds from around the world. Health systems around the world are facing unprecedented The KPMG Global Center of Excellence for Healthcare challenges that require policy makers, payers, providers, contains some of the world’s leading healthcare professionals. and suppliers to rethink how they work. However, while the Individuals in this team have been at the heart of health reform problems are well known the solutions are taking time to and practice for many decades. Most have held senior positions materialize – and time is running out. New approaches to in the private and public sector and are prominent members of providing and paying for healthcare must emerge in the next highly influential think tanks and associations. Based in North few years. The organizations that succeed will be those that America, Europe and Asia/Pacific, the team is mobile and works are able to adapt, experiment, innovate and take risks. alongside our network of 156 member firms to design and implement creative and practical solutions for our clients that In these unprecedented times, healthcare leaders require harness the latest in national, regional and global perspectives. insight and guidance from audit, tax and advisory professionals We are proud to introduce our team in this document. they can trust. That is why leading organizations turn to KPMG’s global health practice. Our propositions revolve around five For additional information or to speak with one of our Center core themes: of Excellence team members, contact your local engagement • Working across regional health ecosystems to redesign partner or email [email protected].
  • 451 Strategic Management of the Romanian

    451 Strategic Management of the Romanian

    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12th INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE “Management Perspectives in the Digital Era” November 1st-2nd, 2018, BUCHAREST, ROMANIA STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF THE ROMANIAN TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES Mihaela ŞTEFAN a*, Andreea MARIN-PANTELESCU b, Mirela TÜRKEŞ c a 1 Decembrie 1918 University, Romania b The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania c Dimitrie Cantemir Christian University, Romania ABSTRACT Analysing the Gross domestic product in Romania, by category of resources, in 2016, the Information and communication industry generated 40,485 million lei (around 9 billion Euros) to the economy development, with a total number of employees of 168,000 people. Regarding the activities of telephony in Romania, there were a total number of 27 million connections in 2016 according to the National Authority for Management and Regulation in Communications, of which 4 million fixed connections and 23 million mobile telephony connections. The present paper analyzed the management activity in the Romanian telecommunication system, presenting vertical integration as a strategic management key and necessity to keep moving forward in this fast field. The research contents four case studies of vertical telecommunication services integration in Romania: Telekom Romania, Orange Romania, Vodafone Romania, Digi Romania. Also we examined the telecommunication companies’ capabilities to undertake an innovation approach to customers. The financial performances shown that vertical integration strategies are the key for success. Combining voice services, both fixed and mobile phone with television and internet represents the future of telecommunication services nowadays and the providers are looking to be a step forward in delivering packages with all this services included. KEYWORDS: connection, integration, Internet, telecommunication. 1.
  • Media Influence Matrix Romania

    Media Influence Matrix Romania

    N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 9 MEDIA INFLUENCE MATRIX: ROMANIA Author: Dumitrita Holdis Editor: Marius Dragomir Published by CEU Center for Media, Data and Society (CMDS), Budapest, 2019 About CMDS About the authors The Center for Media, Data and Society Dumitrita Holdis works as a researcher for the (CMDS) is a research center for the study of Center for Media, Data and Society at CEU. media, communication, and information Previously she has been co-managing the “Sound policy and its impact on society and Relations” project, while teaching courses and practice. Founded in 2004 as the Center for conducting research on academic podcasting. Media and Communication Studies, CMDS She has done research also on media is part of Central European University’s representation, migration, and labour School of Public Policy and serves as a focal integration. She holds a BA in Sociology from point for an international network of the Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca and a acclaimed scholars, research institutions and activists. MA degree in Sociology and Social Anthropology from the Central European University. She also has professional background in project management and administration. She CMDS ADVISORY BOARD has worked and lived in Romania, Hungary, France and Turkey. Clara-Luz Álvarez Floriana Fossato Ellen Hume Monroe Price Marius Dragomir is the Director of the Center Anya Schiffrin for Media, Data and Society. He previously Stefaan G. Verhulst worked for the Open Society Foundations (OSF) for over a decade. Since 2007, he has managed the research and policy portfolio of the Program on Independent Journalism (PIJ), formerly the Network Media Program (NMP), in London.
  • KPMG Brand Perceptions 2016

    KPMG Brand Perceptions 2016

    EXTRACT CLIENT AND BRAND INSIGHTS 2016 BRAND PERCEPTION SUMMARY KPMG 2 About this brand perception summary The data contained in this summary represents the views of clients (senior end users of consulting services) as expressed to us via an online survey, more details of which you’ll find in the section entitled “methodology”. It does not represent the view of analysts. The interpretation of that data, however, is ours. It’s based on the unparalleled knowledge that we’ve acquired through years of surveying and interviewing consultants and their clients, and through the work we’ve done—and continue to do—advising the leaders of the world’s biggest and most successful consulting firms about their businesses. A full list of firms for which brand perception summaries are available can be found towards the back of this document. REPORT EXTRACT: non-exclusively licensed for internal use only 3 Methodology In December 2015 we surveyed 2,649 clients—senior end users of consulting services from around the globe, all of whom had made extensive use of consultants—and asked them to tell us about three Firms included in our global study and consulting firms of their choosing, giving us 9,278 responses in total. We asked about those firms’ how we classify them: capabilities, across a range of consulting services, about the extent to which they deliver value relative to the fees they charge, and about the attributes they associate with each firm. We also asked about the Accenture Technology likelihood of using a firm, whether they have recommended a firm, and if that firm is their first choice Aon Hewitt HR for each service.
  • Accenture • Deloitte & Touche • KPMG • Pwc

    Accenture • Deloitte & Touche • KPMG • Pwc

    Professional Services: Pharmaceuticals: Financial Services: Consumer Goods: Food & Drink: Accenture Abbott Allianz UK 3M Bacardi Deloitte & Touche AbbVie Arab African International AkzoNobel Britvic KPMG Astra Zeneca Bank Clarks Coca-Cola Enterprises PwC GlaxoSmithKline Aviva/Friends Life General Mills Coca-Cola Hellenic AXA Japan Tobacco Diageo Travel & Hospitality: Industrial & Energy: Barclays JTI SA Heineken First Group AngloGoldAshanti Capital One JTI UK Kellogg's Go Ahead BAE Systems Citi L'Occitane Mondelez Manchester Airport Jaguar Land Rover Deutsche Bank Philip Morris International Media: Group Johnson Matthey HSBC Management S.A. Michelin ING Ricoh UK Aegis Retail: Rolls-Royce Intesa San Paolo BSkyB Utilities & Services: Home Retail Group Siemens Investec Plc Experian Jeronimo-Martins Skanksa IPF (International Anglian Water Liberty Global Europe John Lewis Partnership Wood Group Personal Finance) Centrica Pearson Marks & Spencer Nationwide Deutsche Post DHGL Reed Elsevier Property, Construction, Southern Co-operatives Provident Financial Group Housing & Facilities: Legal: The Boots Group Prudential DP World The Co-operative Group BAM Construct UK Rothschild EDP Freshfields Bruckhaus British Land Santander UK Galp Energia Deringer Technology & Telecoms: Hammerson Schroders National Grid Linklaters Alcatel Lucent Intu Properties plc St James's Place Port of Tyne Olswang ARM ISS UK Standard Chartered Royal Mail Wragge Lawrence BT JLL UK Standard Life ScottishPower Graham & Co LLP Deutsche Telekom AG L&Q Housing Group The Royal Bank of Severn Trent Intel Corporation Land Securities Scotland Group SGN ST Microelectronics Lend Lease UBS Terna Workday Foundation Quintain Estates & UniCredit Thames Water Development PLC Zurich United Utilities Sanctuary Housing Group Shaftesbury The Crown Estate Willmott Dixo .
  • The Forrester Wave™: Microsoft Dynamics 365 Services, Q2 2019 the 12 Providers That Matter Most and How They Stack up by Leslie Joseph May 21, 2019

    The Forrester Wave™: Microsoft Dynamics 365 Services, Q2 2019 the 12 Providers That Matter Most and How They Stack up by Leslie Joseph May 21, 2019

    LICENSED FOR INDIVIDUAL USE ONLY The Forrester Wave™: Microsoft Dynamics 365 Services, Q2 2019 The 12 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up by Leslie Joseph May 21, 2019 Why Read This Report Key Takeaways In our 23-criterion evaluation of Microsoft Avanade, HCL Technologies, And PwC Lead Dynamics 365 service providers, we identified the The Pack 12 most significant ones — Avanade, Cognizant, Forrester’s research uncovered a market in DXC Technology, HCL Technologies, Hitachi which Avanade, HCL Technologies, and PwC Solutions, IBM, Infosys, KPMG, PwC, Sonata are Leaders; DXC Technology, Hitachi Solutions, Software, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), and Infosys, KPMG, and Sonata Software are Strong Wipro — and researched, analyzed, and scored Performers; and Cognizant, IBM, TCS, and Wipro them. This report shows how each provider are Contenders. measures up and helps application development Business Consulting, Cloud, And Delivery and delivery professionals select the right one for Excellence Are Key Differentiators their needs. As Microsoft Dynamics evolves into a business applications platform, breadth of consulting and delivery capabilities and depth in intellectual property (IP) and domain knowledge will dictate which providers will lead the pack. Vendors that can provide these capabilities position themselves to successfully deliver Microsoft Dynamics services to their customers for high business impact at low risk. This PDF is only licensed for individual use when downloaded from forrester.com or reprints.forrester.com. All
  • Bijlage Overzicht Investeringen in ABN AMRO En ASR (Nominaal, in € Mrd)

    Bijlage Overzicht Investeringen in ABN AMRO En ASR (Nominaal, in € Mrd)

    Bijlage Overzicht investeringen in ABN AMRO en ASR (nominaal, in € mrd) 1 Oktober 2008 Aankoop Fortis Bank Nederland, ASR Nederland en Fortis Corporate Insurance in één koop. 16,80 2 December 2008 Het indirecte belang in ABN AMRO wordt rechtstreeks onder de Staat gebracht. Fortis Bank Nederland verkoopt dit belang aan de Staat; Staat betaalt door uitstaand vreemd vermogen kwijt te schelden. 6,54 3 Juni 2009 Verkoop van Fortis Corporate Insurance aan Amlin. -/- 0,35 4 Juli 2009, december 2009 Tweede Kamer gaat in twee fasen akkoord met de herkapitalisatie van ABN AMRO en Fortis Bank Nederland. • Aan N-share zijn converteerbare leningen van € 2,6 mrd verstrekt; vreemd vermogen zolang de N-share niet was gesepareerd, aandelenvermogen daarna. Het laatste gedeelte van de herkapitalisatie, € 0,49 mrd, zal in de vorm van aandelenkapitaal aan ABN AMRO Group beschikbaar worden gesteld. • Bij FBN is € 1,35 mrd aan vreemd vermogen omgezet in eigen vermogen. • Voor afrekening met consortiumpartners is € 0,74 mrd gereserveerd, waarvan inmiddels € 0,44 is besteed. • Wel onderdeel van de herkapitalisatie, maar geen investering is het credit relief instrument, een garantie die de Staat heeft afgegeven op een hypotheekportefeuille. Door deze garantie behoefde ABN AMRO € 1,7 mrd minder kapitaal aan te houden. Het instrument is inmiddels beëindigd. 4,88 Totale investering in ABN AMRO en ASR 27,87 5 Opbrengsten uit kapitaalverschaffing • Rente-, premie- en dividendontvangsten 2008 0,502 • Rente-, premie- en dividendontvangsten 2009 0,733 • Rente-, premie- en dividendontvangsten 2010 0,360 -/- 1,60 Netto-investering, exclusief kapitaalkosten Staat 26,27 • Per 31 december 2010 bedroeg het bij de Staat uitstaande vreemd vermogen in ABN AMRO € 4,58 mrd.
  • Controversial Arms Trade

    Controversial Arms Trade

    Case study: Controversial Arms Trade A case study prepared for the Fair Insurance Guide Case study: Controversial Arms Trade A case study prepared for the Fair Insurance Guide Anniek Herder Alex van der Meulen Michel Riemersma Barbara Kuepper 18 June 2015, embargoed until 18 June 2015, 00:00 CET Naritaweg 10 1043 BX Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel: +31-20-8208320 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.profundo.nl Contents Summary ..................................................................................................................... i Samenvatting .......................................................................................................... viii Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Chapter 1 Background ...................................................................................... 2 1.1 What is at stake? ....................................................................................... 2 1.2 Trends in international arms trade .......................................................... 3 1.3 International standards............................................................................. 4 1.3.1 Arms embargoes ......................................................................................... 4 1.3.2 EU arms export policy ................................................................................. 4 1.3.3 Arms Trade Treaty .....................................................................................