DOCSLIB.ORG

Washington, D.C., Metropolitics Myron Orfield University of Minnesota Law School

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Washington, D.C., Metropolitics Myron Orfield University of Minnesota Law School University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Studies Institute on Metropolitan Opportunity 1998 Washington, D.C., Metropolitics Myron Orfield University of Minnesota Law School Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.umn.edu/imo_studies Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Myron Orfield, Washington, D.C., Metropolitics (1998). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Studies collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Washington Metropolitics: A Regional Agenda for Community and Stability Myron Orfield Metropolitan Area Research Corporation A Report to the Brookings Institution July 1999 This report was a project of the Metropolitan Area Research Corporation (MARC). It was made possible with the support of the Prince Charitable Trusts, The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation, The Eugene and Agnes E. Meyer Foundation, The Philip L. Graham Fund, Robert Kogod, and W. Russell Ramsey. The Metropolitan Area Research Corporation would like to thank the following people for their written comments which greatly improved the final report: Jennifer Bradley, The Brookings Institution; Lee Epstein, Chesapeake Bay Foundation; Bruce Katz, The Brookings Institution; Robert Lang, The Fannie Mae Foundation; and Amy Liu, The Brookings Institution. Input from the following people through meetings and personal interviews was also very helpful and much appreciated: Anne Allen, The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation; Mary Bellor, The Philip L. Graham Fund; Max Brown, Mayor Anthony Williams’ Office, District of Columbia; Tim Coughlin, Riggs Bank; Wayne Curry, County Executive, Prince Georges County, Maryland; Phil Dearborn, Greater Washington Research Center; Doug Duncan, County Executive, Montgomery County, Maryland; Al Eisenberg, Board of Supervisors, Arlington County, Virginia; Stephen Fuller, Institute of Public Policy, George Mason University; James Gibson, D.C. Agenda; Hope Gleicher, Trellis Fund; Kate Hanley, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, Fairfax County, Virginia; John Hechinger, Hechinger Co.; Sandy Hillyer, Metropolitan Strategies; Thelma Jones, World Bank; Dave King, Mayor Anthony Williams’ Office, District of Columbia; Ron Kirby, National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments; Wendy Klancher, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments; Robert P. Kogod; Charlotte Kroll, The Brookings Institution; Joyce Ladner, The Brookings Institution and The D.C Control Board; Matt Lambert, The Brookings Institution; Irene Lee and other staff members from The Annie E. Casey Foundation; Bob McNamara; Kristin Pauly, Prince Charitable Trusts; Nancy Perkins, The Brookings Institution; Cynthia Robbins, The Eugene and Agnes E. Meyer Foundation; Julie Rogers, The Eugene and Agnes E. Meyer Foundation; Michael Rogers, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments; Mark Rubin, The Urban Institute; Stewart Schwartz, Coalition for Smarter Growth/Washington Regional Network; Tom Shellabarger, U.S. Catholic Conference; Marge Turner, The Urban Institute; Lisa Williams, The Fannie Mae Foundation; and representatives from the Community Development Support Collaborative, the Council of Latino Agencies, the Downtown Cluster of Congregations, the Enterprise Foundation, Local Initiative Support Corporation, Partners for Livable Communities, the Sierra Club, and 1000 Friends of Maryland. Lisa Bigaouette, Emily Greenwald, Mary Hagerman, Scott Laursen, and Andrea Swansby of MARC made the maps and assisted in the production of the report. Myron Orfield is the Director of MARC. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 A. Context ................................................................................................................................. 1 B. The Washington Region and Who Should Read this Report ................................................ 3 C. A Regional Agenda ............................................................................................................... 4 II. Problems Associated with Regional Polarization & Sprawl ....................................................... 7 A. Concentrated Poverty ........................................................................................................... 7 B. Racial Segregation .............................................................................................................. 13 C. Fiscal Stress & High Development Costs on the Region's Fringe ...................................... 15 D. Environmental & Transportation Impacts .......................................................................... 17 III. Demographic Findings ............................................................................................................. 19 A. Poverty ................................................................................................................................ 19 B. Poor Children ...................................................................................................................... 21 C. Female-Headed Households ............................................................................................... 23 D. Median Household Income ................................................................................................. 24 E. Schools ................................................................................................................................ 25 1. Students Eligible for Free and Reduced-Cost Meals .................................................... 26 2. Non-Asian Minority Students ....................................................................................... 27 3. The Flight of White Preschool Children ....................................................................... 29 F. Crime ................................................................................................................................... 30 G. Infrastructure ...................................................................................................................... 32 H. Regional Sprawl ................................................................................................................. 36 I. Fiscal Disparities .................................................................................................................. 37 1. Overview ....................................................................................................................... 37 2. Cities and Counties ....................................................................................................... 38 3. School Districts ............................................................................................................. 39 J. Jobs ..................................................................................................................................... 39 1. The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis ................................................................................ 39 2. Jobs per Capita ............................................................................................................. 40 3. Fair Share of the Region’s Job Growth ......................................................................... 41 4. Commuting Patterns and Proximity to Jobs .................................................................. 42 5. Total Number of Jobs and Types of Jobs ...................................................................... 43 IV. Metropolitan Solutions ............................................................................................................ 44 A. Equity ................................................................................................................................. 44 1. Fairness ......................................................................................................................... 45 2. Competition for Tax Base and Fiscal Zoning ............................................................... 46 3. Land Use Planning ........................................................................................................ 46 4. Reinvestment in the Core .............................................................................................. 47 B. Smart Growth ...................................................................................................................... 47 C. Metropolitan Structural Reform .......................................................................................... 49 1. Overview ....................................................................................................................... 49 2. Transportation and Transit Planning ............................................................................. 49 V. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 51 Washington Metropolitics I. Introduction The mission of the Metropolitan Area Research Corporation (MARC)1 is to study growing social separation and wasteful, sprawling development patterns in U.S. metropolitan areas and to assist individuals and groups seeking to create and implement local responses to these trends. Since
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Women and the Law in Colonial Maryland, 1648-1715 Monica C
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects "Justice Without Partiality": Women and the Law in Colonial Maryland, 1648-1715 Monica C. Witkowski Marquette University Recommended Citation Witkowski, Monica C., ""Justice Without Partiality": Women and the Law in Colonial Maryland, 1648-1715" (2010). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 27. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/27 “JUSTICE WITHOUT PARTIALITY”: WOMEN AND THE LAW IN COLONIAL MARYLAND, 1648-1715 by Monica C. Witkowski A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2010 ABSTRACT “JUSTICE WITHOUT PARTIALITY”: WOMEN AND THE LAW IN COLONIAL MARYLAND, 1648-1715 Monica C. Witkowski Marquette University, 2010 What was the legal status of women in early colonial Maryland? This is the central question answered by this dissertation. Women, as exemplified through a series of case studies, understood the law and interacted with the nascent Maryland legal system. Each of the cases in the following chapters is slightly different. Each case examined in this dissertation illustrates how much independent legal agency women in the colony demonstrated. Throughout the seventeenth century, Maryland women appeared before the colony’s Provincial and county courts as witnesses, plaintiffs, defendants, and attorneys in criminal and civil trials. Women further entered their personal cattle marks, claimed land, and sued other colonists. This study asserts that they improved their social standing through these interactions with the courts. By exerting this much legal knowledge, they created an important place for themselves in Maryland society. Historians have begun to question the interpretation that Southern women were restricted to the home as housewives and mothers.
    [Show full text]
  • Existing Land Use Characteristics
    CHAPTER FIVE EXISTING LAND USE CHARACTERISTICS Rappahannock County is a scenic, rural County dominated by forestal land uses, which occupied over 50% of the County's land area in 1997 according to the Census of Agriculture. This is due in part to the 31,700 acres of the Shenandoah National Park located in the County. However, it may also be attributed to the rugged character of the area that makes much of the land unsuitable for plowing. Agriculture and pasture is the second most dominant land use in the County with almost 34% of the land in this category. Vacant land, which consisted of unusable land due to location, slope, or soil conditions accounts for 7.6% of the County's land. The remaining 1.92% may be considered developed (see Table 5.1). Table 5.1 Existing Land Uses (Estimated) Acres % Residential 1,450 0.80 Commercial 75 0.04 Industrial 45 0.03 Public/Semi-Public 100 0.05 Highways, Roads, R-O-W 2,050 1.20 SUB-TOTAL 3,720 2.00 (DEVELOPED) Agriculture Crops & 57,337 33.55 Pasture Forests Farms 31,349 18.34 Commercial 36,774 21.52 Federal 31,700 18.55 Vacant 10,000 5.85 SUB-TOTAL 167,160 98 (UNDEVELOPED) GRAND TOTAL 170,880 100.00 47 *Note that as of 1994, there were approximately 20,600 acres in Agricultural and Forestal Districts and 3,500 acres in conservation easement in Rappahannock County. Map No. 10: Agricultural/Forestal Districts shows the approximate location of the current Agricultural and Forestal Districts in the County.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic and Sexual Violence in Virginia
    2012 Annual Report Domestic and Sexual Violence in Virginia Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II Attorney General of Virginia Office of the Attorney General i COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Office of the Attorney General Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II 900 East Main Street Attorney General Richmond, Virginia23219 804-786-2071 December 28, 2012 FAX 804-786-1991 Virginia Relay Services 800-828-1120 7-1-1 To the Chairs of the Senate and House Courts of Justice Committees and the Virginia State Crime Commission: I am pleased to present to you the 2012 Annual Report on Domestic and Sexual Violence in Virginia, pursuant to Virginia Code § 2.2-515.1. The Report uses current statewide data to underscore the impact of domestic and sexual violence on the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Report highlights various initiatives undertaken by agencies and organizations in Virginia, including public awareness campaigns, training activities, legislative changes and other statewide efforts to address these critical issues. The Report presents an overview of grant programs and services available to domestic violence and sexual assault victims, as well as the major funding sources for those programs and services. Finally, the Report includes extensive contact information for national, state, and local agencies and programs that work with or provide resources to victims of sexual and domestic violence. I am proud of the progress we have made in addressing domestic and sexual violence in the Commonwealth of Virginia and I am committed to furthering that progress in the upcoming year. I am confident that Virginia will continue to support programs and initiatives to promote safety for victims and to hold offenders accountable.
    [Show full text]
  • Open the Trestle" Rally County Executive Doug Duncan Announces Support for the Trestle and the Trail by Wayne Phyillaier/CCCT Chair
    HERESCENT Fall 1999 Vol X No. 4 Coalition Hosts "Open The Trestle" Rally County Executive Doug Duncan announces support for the trestle and the Trail By Wayne Phyillaier/CCCT Chair One of the best ways to build support and stewardship of the Capital Crescent Trail is to provide opportunities for trail users and local residents to experience trail advocacy in a personal way. On Saturday, October 23d, the Coalition for the Capital Crescent Trail did just that. Trail lovers from all around the metropolitan area participated in Coalition-sponsored hikes, both walking and biking, to the Rock Creek Park trestle for an "Open The Trestle" rally. Several Coalition Board members addressed the rally, and outlined why I repairing and opening the trestle for Trail use was essential for completing a first class interim trail to Silver Spring. Results of a Coalition sponsored I engineering design study were presented that show how the trestle can be rebuilt for Trail use at a t Dozrg Dz~ncanut rally fraction of the cost of building a new bridge. Joining rally participants was Montgomery County Executive, Mr. Doug Duncan, who spoke in support of completing the Trail. In a surprise announcement, Mr. Duncan pledged to put funding to rebuild the trestle in the upcoming FY 2001-2002 budget. He challenged trail supporters to do their part and get the support of the five County Council members needed to pass the budget. Mr. Duncan's pledge of support is a very welcome event, and allows the Coalition to focus its advocacy for the trestle on the Montgomery County council.
    [Show full text]
  • Frederick County Sheriff's Office 1080 Coverstone Dr, Winchester, VA 22602
    2018 Annual R e p o r t Frederick County Sheriff’s Office 1080 Coverstone Dr, Winchester, VA 22602 Randall Earl Hensley, 46, of Luray, formerly of Elkton, Va., passed away Sunday, September 2, 2018. He was born April 24, 1972, in Harrisonburg and was the son of Lawrence Earl and Shelby Jean Shifflett Hensley of Elkton. Randall graduated from Spotswood High School. He was employed in law enforcement for a total of 24 years with Rockingham County Sheriff's Office, Grottoes Police Department and was currently employed with the Frederick County Sheriff's Office. He was active with the SWAT team, search and rescue team, dive team, and was a field training officer. He was the vice president of the Gunfighters MC, Battlefield Chapter, a member of the Shenandoah Moose Lodge #2176, and the Fraternal Order of the Eagles #4264 in New Market. Randall had many pastimes that he enjoyed including fishing, hunting and shooting guns. He will forever be remembered as a dedicated father and paw-paw and greatly missed by all that knew him. His wife, Melissa "Missy" Ann (Judd) Hensley, passed away by his side on September 2, 2018. In addition to his parents, he is survived by, his daughters, Brooklyn Gum and husband, Austin and Brittany Shifflett and companion, Jesse Sampson, all of Shenandoah; step-son, David Seal; step-daughter, Nicole Ruffner; sister, Cindy Havens and husband, Stan of Williamsburg; brother, Rodney Hensley and wife, Monica of Elkton; two grandchildren, Michael Shifflett and Avery Shifflett; nieces and nephews, Kevin Taylor, Kristen Bunch, Joshua May, Travis Hensley, Tyler Hensley and Alexis Hensley and three great-nieces, all of whom he dearly loved.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Departments and Crime Status in Virginia Communities: an Assessment from the Citizen Perspective
    POLICE DEPARTMENTS AND CRIME STATUS IN VIRGINIA COMMUNITIES: AN ASSESSMENT FROM THE CITIZEN PERSPECTIVE By Frank T. Manheim1, Timothy B. Bullock2, and Jahtanya S. Scott3 Percent Change in Property Crime Rates in Virginia Localities, 2010-2015 20% Col. Heights Suffolk Suffolk 10% Harrisonburg Henrico County 0% -10% -20% Richmond Staunton Winchester Winchester Fredericksburg Fredericksburg Portsmouth -30% Hampton Roanoke County Danville Waynesboro Waynesboro Salem Fairfax County Roanoke Alexandria Bristol Newport News -40% Fairfax Chesterfield County Norfolk Manassas Chesapeake Virginia Beach Virginia -50% Petersburg Hopewell Loudoun County Lynchburg Lynchburg Williamsburg Williamsburg Radford Arlington County Albemarle County Charlottesville -60% Manassas Park Prince William County William Prince Blacksburg Blacksburg George Mason University Federal Work-Study Report, May 1, 2018 1 Affiliate Professor, Schar School of Policy and Government, George Mason University 2 Undergraduate Student, George Mason University 3 B.Sc. Graduate, 2017, George Mason University 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the first extensive assessment of crime status and police performance for communities in Virginia. Twenty-four counties and 29 cities were studied for the period 2015 and 2016. Performance was rated from a citizen, rather than a professional law enforcement perspective. Special attention was given to African American communities. The assessment utilized publicly accessible data sources including demographic data from the U.S. Census Bureau, police department web sites, FBI UCR crime statistics, media reports, and other data. Virginia has crime rates below the national average, ranking 6th lowest in violent crime and 10th lowest in property crime for 2016. Poor correlation was found between crime rates and population size. Loudoun and Fairfax counties in northern Virginia, the two wealthiest counties in the United States, had low crime rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Safety
    PUBLIC SAFETY 010 In Review 2 Part I crime in Greenbelt decreased 6.8% in 2010, from 1,396 reported incidents in 2009 to 1,300. Part I crimes are defined as murder, rape, robbery, assault, burglary, theft and auto theft. By comparison, the Washington Metropolitan region of Montgomery and Prince George’s counties, known as UCR Region IV, experienced a 10.5% decrease in 2009, according to the latest published Maryland State Police Uniform Crime Report (May 10, 2010). Violent crimes of murder, rape, robbery and aggravated assault involve the element of personal confrontation between the perpetrator and the victim; consequently they are considered more serious crimes than property crimes because of their very nature. These offenses accounted for 16% of all crime in Maryland. For Greenbelt, violent crime comprised 14% of all Part I crimes indicating that Greenbelt falls in line with statewide violent crime trends. Crimes against persons, at 185, were the lowest since 2004, driven by a 17% decline in robbery, 106 reported incidents. Robbery remains the most prevalent violent crime in our community, accounting for 57% of all personal crime. Sixty- six (66) robberies occurred in Greenbelt West (62.2%), twenty-nine (29) in Greenbelt East (27.3%) and eleven (11) in historic Greenbelt (10.3%). The number of property crimes reported during 2010 (1,115) was over six times greater than the number of violent crimes. As a group, property crime made up 86% of the total crimes in 2010. Property crimes decreased 7% overall. Notably, motor vehicle theft (133) declined 25%. Geographically, 51% of crime occurred in Greenbelt West, 35% in Greenbelt East and 14% in historic Greenbelt.
    [Show full text]
  • Marylandinfluencers
    MarylandInfluencers f there was one place where the Democratic Party could take sol- ace on Election Day 2010, it was Maryland, a rock that broke part Iof the red tide sweeping the country. In a year where Republi- cans hoped to make gains across the board, Democrats proved their dominance in the biggest races, holding the governor’s mansion in a landslide, losing just a handful of seats in the state House of Delegates, and actually gaining ground in the state Senate. Any doubts about how deep blue Maryland is—particularly within the state’s heavily populated central corridor—were surely dissipated. Yet the next few years will be pivotal for both parties. Age and term limits are taking their toll on veteran officeholders, opening up op- portunities for ambitious Republicans and Democrats alike to make their mark. The blood sport of redistricting will play out as well. Here is our list of the Democrats and Republicans who are helping to make the decisions and start the important political conversations today in the Chesapeake Bay State—as well as some likely to play a bigger role in the future. Top 10 Republicans Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr. GOP voters for representatives who her husband. She may be ending her The only Republican governor in Mary- are fiscally conservative and socially conservative talk radio show on WBAL land since the 1960s was dealt a huge moderate. 1090-AM in Baltimore—a thorn in blow in November when his rematch Democratic sides for years—but she will with O’Malley ended in a landslide loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic and Sexual Violence in Virginia
    Domestic and Sexual Violence in Virginia 2010 Annual Report Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II Attorney General of Virginia COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Office of the Attorney General Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II 900 East Main Street Attorney General Richmond, Virginia 23219 804-786-2071 December 30, 2010 FAX 804-786-1991 Virginia Relay Services 800-828-1120 7-1-1 To the Chairs of the Senate and House Courts of Justice Committees and the Virginia State Crime Commission: I am pleased to present to you the Annual Report on Domestic and Sexual Violence in Virginia, pursuant to Virginia Code § 2.2-515.1. The Report uses current statewide data to shed light on the impact of domestic and sexual violence on the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Report highlights various initiatives undertaken by agencies and organizations in Virginia, including public awareness campaigns, training activities, and other statewide efforts to address these critical issues. The Report offers an overview of grant programs and services available to domestic violence and sexual assault victims, as well as the major funding sources for those programs and services. Finally, the Report includes extensive contact information for national, state, and local agencies and programs that work with or provide resources to victims of sexual and domestic violence. I am proud of the progress we have made in addressing domestic and sexual violence in the Commonwealth of Virginia. I am confident that Virginia will continue to support programs and initiatives to promote safety for victims and to hold offenders accountable. Sincerely, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II Domestic and Sexual Violence in Virginia 2010 Annual Report Office of the Attorney General Domestic Violence Initiatives Kenneth T.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Acute Care of Adult and Post-Pubertal Adolescent Sexual Assault Patients
    Virginia’s Healthcare Response to Sexual Assault( Guidelines for the Acute Care of Adult and Post-Pubertal Adolescent Sexual Assault Patients !"#$%#&%'()*%$*'(#+(,,,- .'/0#%#*11)2'.+$3"$)%'*3'"$45$*$# - ) 4 5 ( This page intentionally left blank. This page intentionally left blank. Virginia’s Healthcare Response to Sexual Assault Guidelines for the Acute Care of Adult and Post-Pubertal Adolescent Sexual Assault Patients Available online at www.sexualanddomesticviolencevirginia.org ! ! December 2009 Prepared by Virginia Sexual and Domestic Violence Action Alliance Virginia Chapter of the International Association of Forensic Nurses ! In collaboration with Secretary of Health and Human Resources Virginia Department of Health Virginia Department of Health Professions Virginia College of Emergency Physicians Virginia Hospital and Healthcare Association Virginia Association of Free Clinics Secretary of Public Safety Commonwealth’s Attorney Services Council Virginia Association of Chiefs of Police Virginia Department of Forensic Science Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services Criminal Injuries Compensation Fund Virginia Coalition Against Campus Sexual Assault ! This project was supported by V-STOP grant no. 09-B5461VA08 awarded by the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) from funds authorized by the federal Violence Against Women Act and awarded to Virginia by the U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed do not necessarily represent those of DCJS or the U.S. Department of Justice. This document provides guidance for compassionate and effective care for adult and post-pubertal adolescent sexual assault patients. It does not represent the only medically or legally acceptable response to any sexual assault patient or establish a legal or medical standard of care, and deviation from this document does not necessarily represent a breach of a standard of care.
    [Show full text]
  • TITLE Now Is the Time: an Action Agenda for Improvi% G Black and Minority Health in Maryland. the Final Report of the Maryland Governor's Commission on Black and Minority Health
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 326 585 UD 026 889 TITLE Now Is the Time: An Action Agenda for Improvi%g Black and Minority Health in Maryland. The Final Report of the Maryland Governor's Commission on Black and Minority Health. INSTITUTION Maryland Governor's Commission on Black and Minority Health, Baltimore.; Maryland State Dept. of Health and Mental Hygiene, Baltimore. PUB DATE Nov 87 NOTE 228p. AVAILABLE FROMMaryland Dept. of Health and Mental Hygiene, Policy and Health Statistics Administration, Division of Policy Analysis, 201 West Preston Street, Baltimore, MD 21201. PUB TYPE Reports - Research/Technical (243) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC10 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Blacks; Demography; *Health Needs; *Health Promotion; Health Services; Hearinas; Migrant Workers; *Minority Groups; Mortality Rate; Public Health; *Racial Differences; Refugees; State Surveys; Whites IDENTIFIERS *Access to Health Care; *Maryland ABSTRACT This document comprises a report on the disparity between the health status of Maryland's blacks and minorities and the white population. Information was gathered from statewide public hearings at which over 50 individuals and groups representing the general public and health care providers testified. The major finding was that a disproportionate number of black and minority Marylanders died needlessly between 1983 and 1985 from diseases, homicide, or accidents that were either preventable or controllable. Although Maryland has one of the best health care delivery systems in the nation, major improvements are needed if the health status
    [Show full text]
  • Newly Unsealed Report
    Case 8:18-cv-03821-TDC Document 468-1 Filed 03/05/21 Page 1 of 116 Expert Report Prepared By J. Thomas Manger In Hispanic National Law Enforcement Assoc. NCR et al. v. Prince George’s County et al., United States District Court District of Maryland Civil Action No.: 8:18-cv-03821-TDC 1 CONFIDENTIAL Case 8:18-cv-03821-TDC Document 468-1 Filed 03/05/21 Page 2 of 116 TABLE OF CONTENTS Experience ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Scope of Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 7 Materials Reviewed ........................................................................................................................ 7 Summary of Conclusions ................................................................................................................. 8 Landscape of Policing in the Washington D.C. Metropolitan Area .............................................. 10 A. Recruitment ................................................................................................................ 11 B. Background on Prince George’s County Police Department ...................................... 12 Analysis and Opinions ................................................................................................................... 14 PART 1. INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL EEO COMPLAINT PROCEDURES ....................................... 14 A. Prince George’s
    [Show full text]