DOCSLIB.ORG

Real-World Economic Outcomes of Brexpiprazole and Extended-Release Quetiapine Adjunctive Use in Major Depressive Disorder

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Real-World Economic Outcomes of Brexpiprazole and Extended-Release Quetiapine Adjunctive Use in Major Depressive Disorder ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article ORIGINAL RESEARCH Real-World Economic Outcomes of Brexpiprazole and Extended-Release Quetiapine Adjunctive Use in Major Depressive Disorder This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Arpamas Seetasith 1 Purpose: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a chronic mental disorder with a substantial Mallik Greene 2 clinical and economic burden. Despite the efficacy of adjunctive atypical antipsychotics Ann Hartry 3 (AAP) for augmentation in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who failed first- Chakkarin Burudpakdee 1 line antidepressant therapy (ADT), little is known of the impact of AAP choices on healthcare resource use and costs in real-world practice. Therefore, this study compared real- 1 fi Medical and Scienti c Services, Real- world healthcare utilization and costs in patients with MDD treated with brexpiprazole or World Evidence Solutions, IQVIA, Falls Church, VA 22042, USA; 2Health extended-release (XR) quetiapine as adjunctive treatment to ADT. Economics and Outcomes Research, Patients and methods: Adults with MDD starting adjunctive treatment with brexpiprazole Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development fi And Commercialization, Inc., Princeton, (n=844) or extended-release (XR) quetiapine (n=688) were identi ed in the adjudicated 3 – For personal use only. NJ 08540, USA; Health Economics and health plan claims data (07/2014 09/2016). Resource use and healthcare costs in the 6 Outcomes Research, Lundbeck, months following treatment initiation were compared between non-matched populations, and Deerfield, IL 60015, USA between propensity score-matched groups, and by multivariable regression analyses. Results: During follow-up, unadjusted all-cause hospitalization (6.6% vs 12.5%) and ED visits (17.0% vs 27.5%) were lower with brexpiprazole compared to quetiapine XR (both p<0.001). Brexpiprazole-treated patients had significantly lower mean medical costs (US $6,421 vs US$8,545, p=0.0123) but higher mean pharmacy costs (US$7,401 vs US$4,691, p<0.0001) than quetiapine XR-treated patients did. Total healthcare costs were not signifi- cantly different between the two cohorts. Propensity score-matched comparisons of 397 patients in each cohort showed no statistically significant difference in all-cause hospitaliza- tion, ED visits, and total healthcare costs; and significantly lower medical costs (US$5,719 vs US$8,602, p=0.0092) but higher pharmacy costs (US$7,091 vs US$5,091, p=0.0007) in brexpiprazole compared to quetiapine XR. In multivariable regressions, brexpiprazole was associated with 16.1% lower medical costs (p=0.0186) and 9.4% higher total healthcare costs ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research downloaded from https://www.dovepress.com/ by 209.37.188.42 on 05-Dec-2019 (p=0.0463) as compared to quetiapine XR. Conclusion: Significantly lower medical costs were observed in patients with MDD treated with brexpiprazole vs quetiapine XR. Keywords: atypical antipsychotic agents, comparative effectiveness research, health care utilization, healthcare costs, propensity score matching Introduction Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a chronic mood disorder that affects over Correspondence: Chakkarin 300 million people or 4.4% of the world’s population.1 In the United States (US), Burudpakdee IQVIA, 3110 Fairview Park Drive, Suite 16 million adults or 6.9% of the adult population had at least one major depressive 400, Falls Church, VA 22042, USA episode in 2012. The condition disproportionately affects female adults 35 years or Tel +1 610 244 2025 2,3 Email [email protected] older. MDD is a leading cause of the global disease burden in terms of disability, submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research 2019:11 741–755 741 DovePress © 2019 Seetasith et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms. – http://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S220007 php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) 1 / 1 Seetasith et al Dovepress measured in terms of years lived with disability and dis- treatment – within the first year of first antidepressant therapy ability-adjusted life years.4,5 In the US, MDD resulted in or within six months of evidence of inadequate therapy – is significant economic burden and almost 400 million dis- associated with significantly lower all-cause cost23 and greater ability days per year.2,6 In 2010, the incremental economic reduction in hospitalization and overall medical costs22 com- burden of individuals with MDD was estimated at US pared to delayed treatment. Three AAPs, including $210.5 billion, with 45%-47% attributable to direct costs, aripiprazole (2007), extended-release quetiapine (2009), and 2 and 48%-50% to workplace costs. brexpiprazole (2015), are approved by the FDA as an adjunc- Pharmacotherapy plays an important role in MDD. The tive treatment for MDD.24–26 Despite their efficacy, little is American Psychiatric Association recommends the use of known of the impact of AAP choices for the treatment of an antidepressant medication, such as a selective serotonin MDD on healthcare resource use and costs in real-world reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), serotonin-norepinephrine reup- practice. take inhibitor (SNRI), tricyclic or tetracyclic antidepressant, Brexpiprazole (Rexulti®) is a serotonin-dopamine activity or atypical antidepressant, as an initial treatment choice for modulator that is a partial agonist at 5-HT1A and dopamine patients with mild-to-moderate MDD.7 For patients with D2 receptor, and an antagonist at 5-HT2A and adrenergic severe MDD, the combination of psychotherapy and anti- 27,28 alpha1B/2C receptors, all at similar potency. The drug was depressant medication is recommended as an initial treat- recently approved in the US as adjunctive therapy to antide- ment of choice. For patients with minimal improvement pressant therapy (ADT) for the treatment of MDD and the after initial treatment, switching to an antidepressant from treatment of schizophrenia in 2015.26 Extended-release que- the same pharmacological class to one from a different class tiapine (Seroquel XR®) and its active metabolite, N-desalkyl or augmenting the antidepressant with other agents such as quetiapine (norquetiapine) are partial agonists at 5-HT ,and lithium, thyroid hormone or an atypical antipsychotic med- 1A antagonists at 5-HT ,5-HT ,dopamineD,histamineH, ication (AAP) has shown to be effective in improving 2A 2c 2 1 29 depressive symptoms.7 Results from STAR*D, a large clin- and adrenergic alpha1b receptors. The drug was approved in For personal use only. ical trial of 2,876 evaluable patients with at least moderate 2009 as adjunctive therapy to an antidepressant for the treat- depression, show that only one-third of patients experience ment of MDD and previously, for the treatment of schizophre- remissionwiththeirfirst antidepressant treatment, nia, manic or mixed episode bipolar I disorder, and depressive 25 citalopram.8–10 Among patients who did not achieve suffi- episode bipolar disorder. In this study, we described real- cient response and switched to a different antidepressant, world healthcare resource use and cost associated with adjunc- approximately 25% became symptom-free.8–10 The tive use of brexpiprazole in comparison to quetiapine XR in increased economic burden associated with inadequate patients with MDD. Brexpiprazole was selected because of its treatment response and an increasing number of unsuccess- recent approval for this indication while quetiapine XR was ful antidepressant trials,11–13 in addition to the limited selected as a comparator as it is a branded product that is FDA responses and low remission rates, highlight the unmet approved for indications similar to brexpiprazole. need for effective treatment in patients with inadequate response to initial antidepressant therapy. ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research downloaded from https://www.dovepress.com/ by 209.37.188.42 on 05-Dec-2019 Materials and Methods Abundant evidence from prospective, controlled clinical trials supports the use of adjunctive treatment of antidepres- Database sants with AAPs, including olanzapine, risperidone, aripipra- This retrospective study utilized patient-level data from – zole, extended-release quetiapine, ziprasidone, lurasidone,14 IQVIA Real-World Data US Adjudicated Claims (for- and the recently approved drug, brexpiprazole,15 for patients merly known as PharMetrics Plus) between July 2014 and with MDD.16,17 Multiple meta-analysis studies from published September 2016. The database contains adjudicated medi- clinical trials (up until 2010) also show that the use of adjunc- cal, and pharmacy claims for more than 150 million unique tive AAPs was significantly more effective than placebo or enrollees from approximately 60 health plans across the US antidepressant therapy alone in terms of achieving remission and are representative of the US commercially insured
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Drug Use Evaluation: Antipsychotic Utilization in Schizophrenia Patients
    © Copyright 2012 Oregon State University. All Rights Reserved Drug Use Research & Management Program Oregon State University, 500 Summer Street NE, E35 Salem, Oregon 97301-1079 Phone 503-947-5220 | Fax 503-947-1119 Drug Use Evaluation: Antipsychotic Utilization in Schizophrenia Patients Research Questions: 1. How many schizophrenia patients are prescribed recommended first-line second-generation treatments for schizophrenia? 2. How many schizophrenia patients switch to an injectable antipsychotic after stabilization on an oral antipsychotic? 3. How many schizophrenia patients are prescribed 2 or more concomitant antipsychotics? 4. Are claims for long-acting injectable antipsychotics primarily billed as pharmacy or physician administered claims? 5. Does adherence to antipsychotic therapy differ between patients with claims for different routes of administration (oral vs. long-acting injectable)? Conclusions: In total, 4663 schizophrenia patients met inclusion criteria, and approximately 14% of patients (n=685) were identified as treatment naïve without claims for antipsychotics in the year before their first antipsychotic prescription. Approximately 45% of patients identified as treatment naïve had a history of remote antipsychotic use, but it is unclear if antipsychotics were historically prescribed for schizophrenia. Oral second-generation antipsychotics which are recommended as first-line treatment in the MHCAG schizophrenia algorithm were prescribed as initial treatment in 37% of treatment naive patients and 28% of all schizophrenia patients. Recommended agents include risperidone, paliperidone, and aripiprazole. Utilization of parenteral antipsychotics was limited in patients with schizophrenia. Overall only 8% of patients switched from an oral to an injectable therapy within 6 months of their first claim. Approximately, 60% of all schizophrenia patients (n=2512) had claims for a single antipsychotic for at least 12 continuous weeks and may be eligible to transition to a long-acting injectable antipsychotic.
    [Show full text]
  • Schizophrenia Care Guide
    August 2015 CCHCS/DHCS Care Guide: Schizophrenia SUMMARY DECISION SUPPORT PATIENT EDUCATION/SELF MANAGEMENT GOALS ALERTS Minimize frequency and severity of psychotic episodes Suicidal ideation or gestures Encourage medication adherence Abnormal movements Manage medication side effects Delusions Monitor as clinically appropriate Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome Danger to self or others DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA/EVALUATION (PER DSM V) 1. Rule out delirium or other medical illnesses mimicking schizophrenia (see page 5), medications or drugs of abuse causing psychosis (see page 6), other mental illness causes of psychosis, e.g., Bipolar Mania or Depression, Major Depression, PTSD, borderline personality disorder (see page 4). Ideas in patients (even odd ideas) that we disagree with can be learned and are therefore not necessarily signs of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia is a world-wide phenomenon that can occur in cultures with widely differing ideas. 2. Diagnosis is made based on the following: (Criteria A and B must be met) A. Two of the following symptoms/signs must be present over much of at least one month (unless treated), with a significant impact on social or occupational functioning, over at least a 6-month period of time: Delusions, Hallucinations, Disorganized Speech, Negative symptoms (social withdrawal, poverty of thought, etc.), severely disorganized or catatonic behavior. B. At least one of the symptoms/signs should be Delusions, Hallucinations, or Disorganized Speech. TREATMENT OPTIONS MEDICATIONS Informed consent for psychotropic
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Repurposing for the Management of Depression: Where Do We Stand Currently?
    life Review Drug Repurposing for the Management of Depression: Where Do We Stand Currently? Hosna Mohammad Sadeghi 1,†, Ida Adeli 1,† , Taraneh Mousavi 1,2, Marzieh Daniali 1,2, Shekoufeh Nikfar 3,4,5 and Mohammad Abdollahi 1,2,* 1 Toxicology and Diseases Group (TDG), Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center (PSRC), The Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (TIPS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran; [email protected] (H.M.S.); [email protected] (I.A.); [email protected] (T.M.); [email protected] (M.D.) 2 Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran 3 Personalized Medicine Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran; [email protected] 4 Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center (PSRC) and the Pharmaceutical Management and Economics Research Center (PMERC), Evidence-Based Evaluation of Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Group, The Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (TIPS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran 5 Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, School of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran * Correspondence: [email protected] † Equally contributed as first authors. Citation: Mohammad Sadeghi, H.; Abstract: A slow rate of new drug discovery and higher costs of new drug development attracted Adeli, I.; Mousavi, T.; Daniali, M.; the attention of scientists and physicians for the repurposing and repositioning of old medications. Nikfar, S.; Abdollahi, M. Drug Experimental studies and off-label use of drugs have helped drive data for further studies of ap- Repurposing for the Management of proving these medications.
    [Show full text]
  • Should Inverse Agonists Be Defined by Pharmacological Mechanism Or
    CNS Spectrums,(2019), 24 419 – 425. © Cambridge University Press 2018. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/S1092852918000986 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Switching stable patients with schizophrenia from their oral antipsychotics to aripiprazole lauroxil: a post hoc safety analysis of the initial 12-week crossover period Peter J. Weiden,1* Yangchun Du,2 Chih-Chin Liu,2 and Arielle D. Stanford3 1 Medical Affairs, Alkermes, Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts, USA 2 Clinical Development, Alkermes, Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts, USA 3 Clinical Science, Alkermes, Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts, USA Objective. Switching antipsychotic medications is common in patients with schizophrenia who are experiencing persistent symptoms or tolerability issues associated with their current drug regimen. This analysis assessed the safety of switching from an oral antipsychotic to the long-acting injectable antipsychotic aripiprazole lauroxil (AL). Methods. This was a post hoc analysis of outpatients with schizophrenia who were prescribed an oral antipsychotic and who enrolled in an international, open-label, long-term (52-week) safety study of AL. The analysis focused on the first 3 injections of AL 882 mg over 12 weeks, divided into the immediate 4-week crossover period between the first and second AL injections (initiation phase) and the subsequent 8 weeks (stabilization phase). Patients were grouped by preswitch oral antipsychotic medication, and safety and clinical symptoms were assessed. Results. In total, 190 patients had switched from one of the following oral antipsychotic medications: aripiprazole, conventional antipsychotics, risperidone/paliperidone, olanzapine, or quetiapine.
    [Show full text]
  • Advice on Prescribing for Adults with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD)
    Advice on Prescribing for Adults with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) Dr Lynne M Drummond, Local and National OCD Services, Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy Unit, South West London and St George’s Menat Health NHS Trust 9th April 2008 Introduction Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a common psychiatric disorder which untreated has a chronic often deteriorating course. OCD does respond well to treatment with either psychological approaches involving Graded Exposure and Self-Imposed Ritual Prevention (ERP) or with specific pharmacological agents. This paper aims to outline the various psychopharmacological approaches. Psychopharmacological approaches Repeated trials have demonstrated that drugs which act of the serotonin system are effective in many patients with OCD (SRI and SSRIs) • The Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) are generally used as first line rather than clomipramine (a Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor- SRI) due to fewer side effects. • There is little evidence of any particular advantage of any of the SSRIs apart from some evidence that Escitalopram* may reduce relapse of OCD. • In general if there is no response to the SRI on maximal doses for 12 weeks it is worthwhile switching to an alternative. • However there is evidence that benefit from SRI can accrue over as long as 2 years Drug Dose Major side effects Any special features Seizures in a small number of patients The first SRI to and less likely if demonstrate Clomipramine Up to 225mg at <250mg effectiveness in night (increase reducing OCD slowly as tolerated) Sexual Dysfunction symptoms in 80 % Dry mouth; blurred It is a tricyclic vision drowsiness; antidepressant weight gain and orthostatic hypotension 1 50 mg in evening Gastro-intestinal initially and upsets; anorexia and increased weight loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Medication Adherence, Health Care Utilization, and Costs in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder Initiating Adjunctive Atypical * Antipsychotic Treatment
    Clinical Therapeutics/Volume 41, Number 2, 2019 Medication Adherence, Health Care Utilization, and Costs in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Initiating Adjunctive Atypical * Antipsychotic Treatment Michael S. Broder, MD, MSHS1; Mallik Greene, BPharm, PhD, DBA2; Tingjian Yan, PhD1; Eunice Chang, PhD1; Ann Hartry, PhD3; and Irina Yermilov, MD, MPH, MS1 1Partnership for Health Analytic Research, LLC, Beverly Hills, CA, USA; 2Otsuka Phar- maceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc, Princeton, NJ, USA; and 3Lundbeck, Deerfield, IL, USA ABSTRACT (HR ¼ 1.14; 95% CI, 1.00e1.29; P ¼ 0.054). The adjusted rate of all-cause hospitalization or emergency Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare department visit in the postindex period was lowest for medication adherence, health care utilization, and cost brexpiprazole at 27.4% (95% CI, 24.0%e31.0%), among patients receiving adjunctive treatment for compared with 31.1% (95% CI, 27.3%e35.2%) for major depressive disorder (MDD) with brexpiprazole, lurasidone and 35.3% (95% CI, 33.5%e37.1%) for quetiapine, or lurasidone. quetiapine (P< 0.001 for all comparisons). Quetiapine Methods: UsingTruvenHealthMarketScan® users had increased all-cause costs compared with Commercial, Medicaid, and Medicare Supplemental brexpiprazole users (estimate ¼ $2309; 95% CI, Databases, we identified adults with MDD initiating $31e$4587; P ¼ 0.047); all-cause medical costs did not adjunctive treatment with brexpiprazole, quetiapine, or differ between lurasidone and brexpiprazole lurasidone (index atypical antipsychotic [AAP]). We (estimate ¼ $913; 95% CI, $−2033 e$3859; P ¼ 0.543). compared medication adherence and persistence Adjusted psychiatric hospital care, psychiatric costs, and measured by proportion of days covered (PDC) and PDC did not differ significantly among the groups.
    [Show full text]
  • CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DEPRESSANTS Opioid Pain Relievers Anxiolytics (Also Belong to Psychiatric Medication Category) • Codeine (In 222® Tablets, Tylenol® No
    CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DEPRESSANTS Opioid Pain Relievers Anxiolytics (also belong to psychiatric medication category) • codeine (in 222® Tablets, Tylenol® No. 1/2/3/4, Fiorinal® C, Benzodiazepines Codeine Contin, etc.) • heroin • alprazolam (Xanax®) • hydrocodone (Hycodan®, etc.) • chlordiazepoxide (Librium®) • hydromorphone (Dilaudid®) • clonazepam (Rivotril®) • methadone • diazepam (Valium®) • morphine (MS Contin®, M-Eslon®, Kadian®, Statex®, etc.) • flurazepam (Dalmane®) • oxycodone (in Oxycocet®, Percocet®, Percodan®, OxyContin®, etc.) • lorazepam (Ativan®) • pentazocine (Talwin®) • nitrazepam (Mogadon®) • oxazepam ( Serax®) Alcohol • temazepam (Restoril®) Inhalants Barbiturates • gases (e.g. nitrous oxide, “laughing gas”, chloroform, halothane, • butalbital (in Fiorinal®) ether) • secobarbital (Seconal®) • volatile solvents (benzene, toluene, xylene, acetone, naptha and hexane) Buspirone (Buspar®) • nitrites (amyl nitrite, butyl nitrite and cyclohexyl nitrite – also known as “poppers”) Non-Benzodiazepine Hypnotics (also belong to psychiatric medication category) • chloral hydrate • zopiclone (Imovane®) Other • GHB (gamma-hydroxybutyrate) • Rohypnol (flunitrazepam) CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS Amphetamines Caffeine • dextroamphetamine (Dexadrine®) Methelynedioxyamphetamine (MDA) • methamphetamine (“Crystal meth”) (also has hallucinogenic actions) • methylphenidate (Biphentin®, Concerta®, Ritalin®) • mixed amphetamine salts (Adderall XR®) 3,4-Methelynedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, Ecstasy) (also has hallucinogenic actions) Cocaine/Crack
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of Reactive Oxygen Species-Mediated Damage in the Pathogenesis of Schizophrenia
    brain sciences Review Regulation of Reactive Oxygen Species-Mediated Damage in the Pathogenesis of Schizophrenia Samskruthi Madireddy 1,* and Sahithi Madireddy 2 1 Independent Researcher, 1353 Tanaka Drive, San Jose, CA 95131, USA 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-408-9214162 Received: 4 September 2020; Accepted: 15 October 2020; Published: 16 October 2020 Abstract: The biochemical integrity of the brain is paramount to the function of the central nervous system, and oxidative stress is a key contributor to cerebral biochemical impairment. Oxidative stress, which occurs when an imbalance arises between the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the efficacy of the antioxidant defense mechanism, is believed to play a role in the pathophysiology of various brain disorders. One such disorder, schizophrenia, not only causes lifelong disability but also induces severe emotional distress; however, because of its onset in early adolescence or adulthood and its progressive development, consuming natural antioxidant products may help regulate the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Therefore, elucidating the functions of ROS and dietary antioxidants in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia could help formulate improved therapeutic strategies for its prevention and treatment. This review focuses specifically on the roles of ROS and oxidative damage in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia, as well as the effects of nutrition, antipsychotic use, cognitive therapies, and quality of life on patients with schizophrenia. By improving our understanding of the effects of various nutrients on schizophrenia, it may become possible to develop nutritional strategies and supplements to treat the disorder, alleviate its symptoms, and facilitate long-term recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Amitriptyline
    children Review Beyond Amitriptyline: A Pediatric and Adolescent Oriented Narrative Review of the Analgesic Properties of Psychotropic Medications for the Treatment of Complex Pain and Headache Disorders Robert Blake Windsor 1,2,*, Michael Sierra 2,3, Megan Zappitelli 2,3 and Maria McDaniel 1,2 1 Division of Pediatric Pain Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Prisma Health, Greenville, SC 29607, USA; [email protected] 2 School of Medicine Greenville, University of South Carolina, Greenville, SC 29607, USA; [email protected] (M.S.); [email protected] (M.Z.) 3 Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Prisma Health, Greenville, SC 29607, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 October 2020; Accepted: 25 November 2020; Published: 2 December 2020 Abstract: Children and adolescents with recurrent or chronic pain and headache are a complex and heterogenous population. Patients are best served by multi-specialty, multidisciplinary teams to assess and create tailored, individualized pain treatment and rehabilitation plans. Due to the complex nature of pain, generalizing pharmacologic treatment recommendations in children with recurrent or chronic pains is challenging. This is particularly true of complicated patients with co-existing painful and psychiatric conditions. There is an unfortunate dearth of evidence to support many pharmacologic therapies to treat children with chronic pain and headache. This narrative review hopes to supplement the available treatment options for this complex population by reviewing the pediatric and adult literature for analgesic properties of medications that also have psychiatric indication. The medications reviewed belong to medication classes typically described as antidepressants, alpha 2 delta ligands, mood stabilizers, anti-psychotics, anti-sympathetic agents, and stimulants.
    [Show full text]
  • Rexulti (Brexpiprazole)
    Market Applicability Market DC FL FL FL GA KS KY LA MD NJ NV NY TN TX WA & MMA LTC FHK Applicable X X NA NA X NA X X NA X X X NA NA NA *FHK- Florida Healthy Kids Rexulti (brexpiprazole) Override(s) Approval Duration Prior Authorization 1 year Quantity Limit *Indiana Medicaid – see State Specific Mandates below *Maryland Medicaid – see State Specific Mandates below *Virginia Medicaid – see State Specific Mandates below *Washington Medicaid – see State Specific Mandates below Medications Quantity Limit Rexulti (brexpiprazole) May be subject to quantity limit APPROVAL CRITERIA Requests for Rexulti (brexpiprazole) may be approved when the following criteria are met: I. Individual is 18 years of age or older; AND II. Individual is using for one of the following conditions: A. Schizophrenia; AND 1. The individual meets one of the following: a. Individual is maintained on a stable dose of Rexulti; OR b. Individual has had a trial of and inadequate response or intolerance to one preferred generic oral atypical antipsychotic; Preferred generic oral atypical antipsychotics: risperidone tablet/solution, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone, aripiprazole tablet, paliperidone OR c. The preferred generics are not FDA approved and do not have an accepted off-label use per the off-label policy for the prescribed indication and Rexulti does; OR B. Major Depressive Disorder; AND 1. Individual is maintained on a stable dose of Rexulti; OR PAGE 1 of 5 06/20/2018 This policy does not apply to health plans or member categories that do not have pharmacy benefits, nor does it apply to Medicare. Note that market specific restrictions or transition-of-care benefit limitations may apply.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuromodulators for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders (Disorders of Gutlbrain Interaction): a Rome Foundation Working Team Report Douglas A
    Gastroenterology 2018;154:1140–1171 SPECIAL REPORT Neuromodulators for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders (Disorders of GutLBrain Interaction): A Rome Foundation Working Team Report Douglas A. Drossman,1,2 Jan Tack,3 Alexander C. Ford,4,5 Eva Szigethy,6 Hans Törnblom,7 and Lukas Van Oudenhove8 1Center for Functional Gastrointestinal and Motility Disorders, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 2Center for Education and Practice of Biopsychosocial Care and Drossman Gastroenterology, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 3Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; 4Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; 5Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; 6Departments of Psychiatry and Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 7Departments of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; and 8Laboratory for BrainÀGut Axis Studies, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium BACKGROUND & AIMS: Central neuromodulators (antide- summary information and guidelines for the use of central pressants, antipsychotics, and other central nervous neuromodulators in the treatment of chronic gastrointestinal systemÀtargeted medications) are increasingly used for treat- symptoms and FGIDs. Further studies are needed to confirm ment
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Brexpiprazole (OPC-34712) and Aripiprazole in Adult Patients with Acute Schizophrenia: Results from a Randomized, Exploratory Study
    192 Original article The effect of brexpiprazole (OPC-34712) and aripiprazole in adult patients with acute schizophrenia: results from a randomized, exploratory study Leslie Citromea,AiOtac, Kazuhiro Nagamizuc, Pamela Perryb, Emmanuelle Weillerd and Ross A. Bakerb The aim of this study was to explore the effects of (9.4%) than aripiprazole (21.2%). Clinically relevant brexpiprazole and aripiprazole on efficacy, cognitive improvements in psychopathology were observed in functioning, and safety in patients with acute schizophrenia. patients with acute schizophrenia treated with Patients who would benefit from hospitalization/continued brexpiprazole or aripiprazole. Brexpiprazole was well hospitalization for acute relapse of schizophrenia were tolerated, with a lower incidence of akathisia than enrolled and randomized (2 : 1) to target doses of open- aripiprazole. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 31:192–201 label brexpiprazole 3 mg/day or aripiprazole 15 mg/day for Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights 6 weeks. Outcomes included change from baseline to week reserved. 6 in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score, International Clinical Psychopharmacology 2016, 31:192–201 Barratt Impulsiveness Scale 11-item score, and Cogstate computerized cognitive test battery scores. Patients treated Keywords: akathisia, antipsychotic, aripiprazole, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale 11-item, brexpiprazole, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, with brexpiprazole (n = 64) or aripiprazole (n = 33) showed schizophrenia, Specific Levels of Functioning Scale reductions in symptoms of schizophrenia as assessed by aDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, New York Medical College, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score (− 22.9 Valhalla, New York, bOtsuka Pharmaceutical Development & and − 19.4, respectively). A modest reduction in impulsivity Commercialization Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, USA, cOtsuka Pharmaceutical Co.
    [Show full text]