DOCSLIB.ORG

APP203631 Application Form

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APP203631 Application Form Host specificity testing predicts Eadya daenerys (Hym.: Braconidae), a potential biological control agent for the invasive pest Paropsis charybdis will be host specific to Paropsini (Col.: Chrysomelidae: Chrysomelinae) T.M. Withers1, C.L. Todoroki1 G.R. Allen2, A.R. Pugh1 and B.A. Gresham1 1Scion, Private Bag 3020, Rotorua 3046, New Zealand, 2 Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 98, Hobart TAS 7001, Australia, Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract The introduction of a new biological control agent is being proposed in New Zealand for Paropsis charybdis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Chrysomelinae), a eucalypt pest of Australian origin. The Australian solitary larval endoparasitoid Eadya daenerys (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) has been the subject of host range testing against non-target species in containment. The results of testing against two pest paropsine beetles, one native species, and six beneficial biological control agents are reported. All non-target species were springtime-active, external leaf-feeding larvae. Physiological development through to emergence of the parasitoid larva from the host only occurred within species in the tribe Chrysomelini; that is, the target P. charybdis (30 - 34%) and another eucalypt pest Trachymela sloanei (12.5%). Unsuccessful internal parasitism by E. daenerys was discovered upon dissection of four other non-target Chrysomelinae, Dicranosterna semipunctata (1.6%), Allocharis nr tarsalis (7.5%), Chrysolina abchasica (1.8%) and Gonioctena olivaceae (5.2%). Although not a physiological host for the parasitoid, the attack on the endemic beetle larva A. nr tarsalis was concerning. Oviposition attack- insertions were occasionally observed in all non-target species in the petri-dish assays (mean 0 - 1.6 attacks/min) including A. nr tarsalis, however they were significantly less when compared to P. charybdis and T. sloanei (mean 1.1 – 4.4 attacks/min). The order of presentation had no significant impact on the propensity of E. daenerys to attack non- targets. Considering the low propensity to attack, the different feeding niche (shrubs unrelated to Eucalyptus) and the sub-alpine habitat (greater than 1200m a.s.l.) of New Zealand endemic beetles such as A. nr tarsalis, we conclude the likelihood that this parasitoid will encounter and cause mortality to A. nr tarsalis is very low. Our results are consistent with field host relationship studies in Tasmania, and in combination indicate that E. daenerys is highly unlikely to attack any species apart from pest paropsine (Chrysomelini) species feeding on Eucalyptus. Eadya daenerys is proposed as a safe parasitoid for release into the New Zealand environment. Keywords: biological control, host specificity testing, Chrysomelidae, paropsine, beneficial, Allocharis tarsalis, weed biological control agent, eucalyptus pest. INTRODUCTION Host range testing prior to the introduction of classical biological control agents is undertaken to determine the potential risk of negative impacts on non-target species in the receiving country (Barratt et al. 2006). The key to biological control safety is considered by many to be introducing only natural enemies with host specificity limited to the target pest (Sands 1997; Keller 1999). There is a consensus amongst arthropod biological control scientists that phylogeny is a valuable starting point for predicting and assessing the field host range of a parasitoid (Hoddle 2004), but that other criteria such as ecological similarities are also very important (Kuhlmann et al. 2006; van Lenteren et al. 2006). We used this now well-established approach to arthropod host specificity testing to draw up a priority list of non-targets against which to undertake host range testing of Eadya daenerys Ridenbaugh 2018 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) (Withers et al. 2015; Withers et al. 2018). This parasitoid was previously identified as Eadya paropsidis Huddleston & Short (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). It is a solitary larval koinobiont parasitoid that targets Eucalyptus leaf beetles in the genera Paropsis and Paropsisterna (abbreviated to Pst.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Chrysomelinae) in Australia (Tanton & Epila 1984; De Little 1989; Rice 2005a). This parasitoid has been studied in the field in shining gum Eucalyptus nitens (H. Deane & Maiden) Maiden plantations in Tasmania, Australia, where it was associated with Paropsisterna agricola (Chapius) in springtime, a pest of young plantation eucalypts (Rice 2005a; Rice & Allen 2009). Field research on host parasitoid interactions, along with molecular and taxonomic studies, has revealed a species complex, redescribing E. paropsidis and identifying the primary parasitoid of Pst. agricola as Eadya daenerys Ridenbaugh 2018 (Peixoto et al. 2018). To date, E. daenerys has only been recorded in Tasmania, where apart from parasitism of Pst. agricola, it also readily attacks Paropsis charybdis Stål, as well as Pst. bimaculata (Olivier 1807), and Pst. nobilitata (Erichson 1842) (Peixoto et al. 2018). Eadya daenerys is a large (ca. 10-12 mm) black braconid wasp with a bright orange head. Eadya approach host larvae and rapidly oviposit a small (0.3 mm), hydropic egg directly into the haemocoel (Rice 2005a). Eggs expand by absorbing water and nutrients from the host before hatching (Quicke 1997). Combined egg and larval development occurs in 25 days at 18°C within the host (Rice & Allen 2009). The E. daenerys larva emerges from the host’s prepupal stage within the soil, spins a brown silk cocoon, and then undergoes an obligate pupal diapause until the following summer (Rice 2005b). Eadya daenerys is univoltine in Tasmania, with adults present in November to January. The peak abundance of E. daenerys in December coincides with peak Pst. agricola egg laying (Rice 2005b). The Eucalyptus tortoise beetle, Paropsis charybdis, has been present in New Zealand since 1916 (Clark 1938; Styles 1970). P. charybdis continues to be the most significant defoliating pest of the adult foliage of Symphyomyrtus eucalypts in New Zealand (Bain & Kay 1989; Withers & Peters 2017). In particular, E. nitens pulp plantations throughout the country can be heavily defoliated (Murphy & Kay 2000), and numerous other Eucalyptus species being developed for a solid wood industry are also highly palatable to the pest (Lin et al. 2017). The cost of managing P. charybdis (Withers et al. 2013) is a risk for all new eucalypt forest plantations throughout New Zealand. Existing biological control agents that attack the egg stage of P. charybdis have proven to only be adequate in controlling the second summer generation of the pest (Murphy & Kay 2000; Mansfield et al. 2011). The first spring generation is inadequately controlled by the egg parasitoids (E. Peters, unpublished data). Eadya daenerys holds promise for decreasing survival of the spring generation of P. charybdis. Potential negative impacts upon non-target organisms constitute the most important factor in assessing the impact on the receiving environment (Barratt et al. 2010). Prior to initiating host range testing with E. daenerys, a thorough analysis was undertaken to establish the most appropriate non-target beetle species in New Zealand to test (Withers et al. 2015). Beetles were selected based on how closely related they were to the target P. charybdis. Tortoise beetles belong to the tribe Chrysomelini in the sub-family Chrysomelinae. The sub-familial relationships recommended by Reid (1995) and Leschen and Reid (2004) are that the sister sub-family to the Chrysomelinae are the Galerucinae, so we considered all species within these two subfamilies. New Zealand has over 40 native species of Chrysomelinae in 5 genera: Allocharis, Aphilon, Caccomolpus, Chalcolampra and Cyrtonogetus (Leschen & Reid 2004; Reid 2006). All of these species belong to the subtribe Phyllocharina, while Paropsis belongs to a separate subtribe; Paropsina (Reid 2006). New Zealand native Galerucinae are divided into two tribes: the Galerucini and the Alticini (Nadein & Bezděk 2014). All Galerucini are thought to have root-feeding larvae, based on the biology of closely-related species overseas. All Galerucini in New Zealand belong to the “rootworms” subtribe Luperina and no larvae have ever been collected, presumably as they are restricted to the soil (Samuelson 1973). The Alticini are more varied and all are very small (Samuelson 1973). After reviewing all literature and collection records (C. Wardhaugh et al, unpublished data), we identified the largest native species with the greatest likelihood of having leaf feeding larvae, and having a suitable phenology of being active in late spring or summer. Originally we had hoped to find larvae for host specificity testing of Chalcolampra speculifera Sharp (Withers et al. 2015), the largest native Chrysomeline beetle, but it now appears this species larva is nocturnal and lives within refugia (C. Wardhaugh et al, unpublished data). We undertook field work in Kahurangi National Park (Northwest Nelson, New Zealand) to try to locate C. speculifera or larger Allocharis spp. or Caccomolpus spp. (e.g., C. amplus Broun, 1921)(Withers et al. 2015). All species are classified as “naturally uncommon” (Leschen et al. 2012). We only succeeded in locating larvae for host testing of Allocharis nr. tarsalis Broun 1917 (identified by R. Leschen) one of the largest species that feeds externally on leaves of Veronica albicans (Pétrie) Cockayne (Plantaginaceae) (Wardhaugh et al. 2018). Host testing was undertaken with nine
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NEW LATE EOCENE CHRYSOMELIDAE (INSECTA: COLEOPTERA) from BALTIC, ROVNO and DANISH AMBERS by KONSTANTIN S
    [Papers in Palaeontology, Vol. 2, Part 1, 2016, pp. 117–137] NEW LATE EOCENE CHRYSOMELIDAE (INSECTA: COLEOPTERA) FROM BALTIC, ROVNO AND DANISH AMBERS by KONSTANTIN S. NADEIN1, EVGENY E. PERKOVSKY1 and ALEXEY G. MOSEYKO2 1Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, B. Khmelnitsky 15, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine; e-mails: [email protected], [email protected] 2Laboratory of Insect Systematics, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, Saint-Petersburg, 199034, Russia; e-mail: [email protected] Typescript received 17 June 2015; accepted in revised form 25 September 2015 Abstract: New fossil taxa of Chrysomelidae are represented by four species of extant ‘Holarctic’ (temper- described: from Baltic amber, Succinispa stainesi Nadein ate) genera in contrast to one species of a Recent ‘tropi- gen. et. sp. nov. (Cassidinae: Oposispini); from Danish cal’ genus. Faunal composition of leaf beetles of late (Scandinavian) amber, Psyllototus viking Nadein sp. nov. Eocene succinites supports the opinion of Archibald and (Galerucinae: Alticini), Calomicroides danicus Nadein Farrell (2003) that arthropods with different climatic pref- gen. et sp. nov. (Galerucinae: Galerucini: Luperina), erences preserved in Baltic amber were able to co-exist Paleomolpus hirtus Nadein gen. et sp. nov. (Eumolpinae: under an extinct equable climate with temperate summers Eumolpini); from Rovno amber (Ukraine, Klesov), Archeal- and mild winters. tica convexa Nadein gen. et sp. nov. (Galerucinae: Alticini), Taphioporus rovnoi Moseyko and Perkovsky sp. nov. Key words: Chrysomelidae, Rovno amber, Danish amber, (Eumolpinae: Euryopini). Leaf beetles in succinites are Baltic amber, palaeoclimate. T HE family Chrysomelidae (leaf beetles) is one of the Baltic amber collection of the Palaeontological Institute of most species-rich groups of phytophagous Coleoptera and the Russian Academy of Sciences (PIN).
    [Show full text]
  • Trunk Road Estate Biodiversity Action Plan
    Home Welsh Assembly Government Trunk Road Estate Biodiversity Action Plan 2004-2014 If you have any comments on this document, its contents, or its links to other sites, please send them by post to: Environmental Science Advisor, Transport Directorate, Welsh Assembly Government, Cathays Park, Cardiff CF10 3NQ or by email to [email protected] The same contact point can be used to report sightings of wildlife relating to the Trunk Road and Motorway network. Prepared by on behalf of the Welsh Assembly Government ISBN 0 7504 3243 8 JANUARY 2004 ©Crown copyright 2004 Home Contents Foreword by Minister for Economic Development and Transport 4 Executive Summary 5 How to use this document 8 Introduction 9 Background to biodiversity in the UK 10 Background to biodiversity in Wales 12 The Trunk Road Estate 13 Existing guidance and advice 16 TREBAP development 19 Delivery 23 Links to other organisations 26 The Plans 27 Glossary 129 Bibliography and useful references 134 Other references 138 Acknowledgements 139 3 Contents Foreword FOREWORD BY THE MINISTER FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND TRANSPORT The publication of this Action Plan is both a recognition of the way the Assembly Government has been taking forward biodiversity and an opportunity for the Transport Directorate to continue to contribute to the wealth of biodiversity that occurs in Wales. Getting the right balance between the needs of our society for road-based transport, and the effects of the Assembly’s road network on our wildlife is a complex and often controversial issue. The Plan itself is designed to both challenge and inspire those who work with the Directorate on the National Assembly’s road network – and, as importantly, to challenge those of us who use the network to think more about the wildlife there.
    [Show full text]
  • Paropsine Beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in South-Eastern Queensland Hardwood Plantations: Identifying Potential Pest Species
    270 Paropsine beetles in Queensland hardwood plantations Paropsine beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in south-eastern Queensland hardwood plantations: identifying potential pest species Helen F. Nahrung1,2,3 1School of Natural Resource Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Queensland 4001, Australia; and 2Horticulture and Forestry Science, Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Gate 3, 80 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia 3Email: [email protected] Revised manuscript received 17 May 2006 Summary The expansion of hardwood plantations throughout peri-coastal Australia, often with eucalypt species planted outside their native Paropsine chrysomelid beetles are significant defoliators of ranges (e.g. E. globulus Labill. in Western Australia; E. nitens Australian eucalypts. In Queensland, the relatively recent (Deane and Maiden) Maiden in Tasmania), resulted in expansion of hardwood plantations has resulted in the emergence unpredicted paropsine species emerging as pests. For example, of new pest species. Here I identify paropsine beetles collected C. agricola (Chapuis) was not considered a risk to commercial from Eucalyptus cloeziana Muell. and E. dunnii Maiden, two of forestry but became a significant pest of E. nitens in Tasmania the major Eucalyptus species grown in plantations in south-eastern (de Little 1989), and the two most abundant paropsine species Queensland, and estimate the relative abundance of each (C. variicollis (Chapuis) and C. nobilitata (Erichson)) in paropsine species. Although I was unable to identify all taxa to E. globulus plantations in WA were not pests of native forest species level, at least 17 paropsine species were collected, about there (compare Selman 1994; Loch 2005), nor were they initially one-third of which have not been previously associated with considered pests of E.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods and Work Profile
    REVIEW OF THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS OF PHYTOPHTHORA AND THE LIKELY IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES JANUARY 2011 Simon Conyers Kate Somerwill Carmel Ramwell John Hughes Ruth Laybourn Naomi Jones Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Review of the potential impacts on species of higher trophic groups .................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 44 3. Review of the potential impacts on ecosystem services .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mccaskill Alpine Garden, Lincoln College : a Collection of High
    McCaskill Alpine Garden Lincoln College A Collection of High Country Native Plants I/ .. ''11: :. I"" j'i, I Joy M. Talbot Pat V. Prendergast Special Publication No.27 Tussock Grasslands & Mountain Lands Institute. McCaskill Alpine Garden Lincoln College A Collection of High Country Native Plants Text: Joy M. Tai bot Illustration & Design: Pat V. Prendergast ISSN 0110-1781 ISBN O- 908584-21-0 Contents _paQ~ Introduction 2 Native Plants 4 Key to the Tussock Grasses 26 Tussock Grasses 27 Family and Genera Names 32 Glossary 34 Map 36 Index 37 References The following sources were consulted in the compilation of this manual. They are recommended for wider reading. Allan, H. H., 1961: Flora of New Zealand, Volume I. Government Printer, Wellington. Mark, A. F. & Adams, N. M., 1973: New Zealand Alpine Plants. A. H. & A. W. Reed, Wellington. Moore, L.B. & Edgar, E., 1970: Flora of New Zealand, Volume II. Government Printer, Wellington. Poole, A. L. & Adams, N. M., 1980: Trees and Shrubs of New Zealand. Government Printer, Wellington. Wilson, H., 1978: Wild Plants of Mount Cook National Park. Field Guide Publication. Acknowledgement Thanks are due to Dr P. A. Williams, Botany Division, DSIR, Lincoln for checking the text and offering co.nstructive criticism. June 1984 Introduction The garden, named after the founding Director of the Tussock Grasslands and Mountain Lands Institute::', is intended to be educational. From the early 1970s, a small garden plot provided a touch of character to the original Institute building, but it was in 1979 that planning began to really make headway. Land­ scape students at the College carried out design projects, ideas were selected and developed by Landscape architecture staff in the Department of Horticul­ ture, Landscape and Parks, and the College approved the proposals.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and the Paropsine Threat to Eucalyptus in New Zealand
    Biological Control of Paropsis charybdis Stål (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and the Paropsine Threat to Eucalyptus in New Zealand A Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Canterbury by Brendan Dene Murphy New Zealand School of Forestry University of Canterbury 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vi ERRATA vii CHAPTERS Chapter 1. Biological Control of Paropsis charybdis Stål and the Paropsine Threat to Eucalyptus in New Zealand.................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2. The Collection, Importation, and Release of Tasmanian Enoggera nassaui for Biological Control of Paropsis charybdis............................................................................. 8 Chapter 3. Molecular Detection of Enoggera nassaui Strains using the Mitochondrial DNA Gene, Cytochrome Oxidase I ............................................................................................... 22 Chapter 4. Field and Bioassay Assessment of the Host Range .................................................. 32 Chapter 5. Phylogenetic Reconstruction of Tasmanian Chrysophtharta ..................................45 Chapter 6. Assessment of Paropsine Fecundity as an Indicator................................................. 59 Chapter 7. Testing the Parasitoid Host Range and Reproductive Output Hypotheses against Dicranosterna semipunctata ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Host Specificity of Gonioctena
    BIOLOGY AND HOST SPECIFICITY OF GONIOCTENA TREDECIMMACULATA (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE): A POTENTIAL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENT FOR KUDZU by Matthew J. Frye A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology and Applied Ecology Summer 2006 Copyright 2006 Matthew J. Frye All Rights Reserved UMI Number: 1435816 UMI Microform 1435816 Copyright 2006 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 BIOLOGY AND HOST SPECIFICITY OF GONIOCTENA TREDECIMMACULATA (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE): A POTENTIAL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENT FOR KUDZU by Matthew J. Frye Approved:_____________________________________________________ Judith A. Hough-Goldstein, Ph.D. Professor in charge of thesis on behalf of the Advisory Committee Approved: _____________________________________________________ Douglas W. Tallamy, Ph.D. Chairperson of the Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology Approved: _____________________________________________________ Robin W. Morgan, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources Approved: _____________________________________________________ Conrado M. Gempesaw II, Ph.D. Vice Provost for Academic and International Programs ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study could not have been accomplished without the guidance, support, and input of Dr. Judy Hough-Goldstein. Dr. Hough-Goldstein provided insight at every step of the process, from experimental design to statistical analysis, and her efforts are greatly appreciated. I gratefully thank my advisory committee, Dr. Bruce Vasilas, Dr. Doug Tallamy, and Dr. Michael Smith for their suggestions and expertise. Dr. Cliff Keil was integral in the analysis of total phenolics and trichome density, and provided access to and training for necessary equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • General News
    Biocontrol News and Information 27(4), 63N–79N pestscience.com General News David Greathead hoods. Both broom and tagasaste pods can be a seasonally important food source for kererū (an As this issue went to press we received the sad news endemic pigeon, Hemiphaga novaeseelandiae), par- of the untimely death of Dr David Greathead at the ticularly in regions where its native food plants have age of 74. declined. A previous petition for the release of G. oli- vacea into New Zealand was rejected by the New Besides being a dedicated and popular Director of Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry in CABI’s International Institute of Biological Control 1998 on the grounds that there was insufficient (IIBC), David was the driving force behind the estab- information to assess the relative beneficial and lishment and development of Biocontrol News and harmful effects of the proposed introduction. Information. He was an active member of its Edito- rial Board, providing advice and ideas right up to his As part of the submission to ERMA, Landcare death. Research quantified the expected costs and benefits associated with the introduction of additional biolog- We plan that the next issue will carry a full obituary. ical control agents for broom1. Due to uncertainties Please contact us if you would be willing to con- regarding the costs, a risk-averse approach was tribute information: commentary, personal adopted by assuming a worse-case scenario where memories or anecdotes on the contribution that tagasaste was planted to its maximum potential David made. extent in New Zealand (10,000 ha), levels of non- target damage to tagasaste were similar to those on Contact: Matthew Cock & Rebecca Murphy C.
    [Show full text]
  • Crop Colonization by Pests and Specialist Enemies
    insects Article Dispersal in Host–Parasitoid Interactions: Crop Colonization by Pests and Specialist Enemies Edward W. Evans Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5305, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +01-435-797-2552 Received: 7 September 2018; Accepted: 2 October 2018; Published: 5 October 2018 Abstract: Interactions of insect pests and their natural enemies increasingly are being considered from a metapopulation perspective, with focus on movements of individuals among habitat patches (e.g., individual crop fields). Biological control may be undercut in short-lived crops as natural enemies lag behind the pests in colonizing newly created habitat. This hypothesis was tested by assessing parasitism of cereal leaf beetle (Oulema melanopus) and alfalfa weevil (Hypera postica) larvae at varying distances along transects into newly planted fields of small grains and alfalfa in northern Utah. The rate of parasitism of cereal leaf beetles and alfalfa weevils by their host-specific parasitoids (Tetrastichus julis (Eulophidae) and Bathyplectes curculionis (Ichneumonidae), respectively) was determined for earliest maturing first generation host larvae. Rates of parasitism did not vary significantly with increasing distance into a newly planted field (up to 250–700 m in individual experiments) from the nearest source field from which pest and parasitoid adults may have immigrated. These results indicate strong, rapid dispersal of the parasitoids in pursuing their prey into new habitat. Thus, across the fragmented agricultural landscape of northern Utah, neither the cereal leaf beetle nor the alfalfa weevil initially gained substantial spatial refuge from parasitism by more strongly dispersing than their natural enemies into newly created habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera : Chrysomelidae)
    NOTES ON INDIAN CHRYSOMELINAE BASED ON THE COLLECTION OF THE FOREST RESEARCH Title INSTITUTE, DEHRA DUN (COLEOPTERA : CHRYSOMELIDAE) Author(s) Takizawa, Haruo Insecta matsumurana. New series : journal of the Faculty of Agriculture Hokkaido University, series entomology, 21, Citation 49-55 Issue Date 1980-07 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/9808 Type bulletin (article) File Information 21_p49-55.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP INSECTA MATSUMURANA NEW SERIES 21: 49-55 JULY, 1980 NOTES ON INDIAN CHRYSOMELINAE BASED ON THE COLLECTION OF THE FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE, DEHRA DUN (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) " By HARUO TAKIZAWA Research Trips for Forest and Agricultural Insects in the Subcontinent of India (Hokkaid6 University, University of Calcutta, and Zoological Survey of India J oint Project) [Grants-in-Aid for Overseas Scientific Survey, Ministry of Educa­ tion, Japanese Government, 1978, No. 304108; 1979, No. 404307J, Scientific Report No.7. Abstract TAKIZAWA, H. 1980. Notes on Indian Chrysomelinae based on the collection of the Forest Research Institute, Dehra Dun (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Ins. matsum. n. s. 21: 49-55, 4 figs. Based on undetermined collection of the Forest Research Institute, Dehra Dun, a list of 18 Indian Chrysomelinae is given and a new species is described: Humba cyanicollis, Agrosteomela indica indica, Crosita mellyi, Chrysolina aurata aurata, C. modesta, C. exanthematica, C. inconstans, C. madrasae, C. vishnu, C. brahma n. sp., Agasta formosa, Chrysomela populi, Linaeidea chI01'ina, Plagiodera miniaticollis, P. rufescens, Plagiodera sp., Phaedon assamensis, and Pseudolina indica. Aedeagus is figured for 15 species and hind wing for 9 species. Author's address.
    [Show full text]
  • Barcoding Chrysomelidae: a Resource for Taxonomy and Biodiversity Conservation in the Mediterranean Region
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 597:Barcoding 27–38 (2016) Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy and biodiversity conservation... 27 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.597.7241 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Barcoding Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy and biodiversity conservation in the Mediterranean Region Giulia Magoga1,*, Davide Sassi2, Mauro Daccordi3, Carlo Leonardi4, Mostafa Mirzaei5, Renato Regalin6, Giuseppe Lozzia7, Matteo Montagna7,* 1 Via Ronche di Sopra 21, 31046 Oderzo, Italy 2 Centro di Entomologia Alpina–Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy 3 Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, lungadige Porta Vittoria 9, 37129 Verona, Italy 4 Museo di Storia Naturale di Milano, Corso Venezia 55, 20121 Milano, Italy 5 Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources–University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran 6 Dipartimento di Scienze per gli Alimenti, la Nutrizione e l’Ambiente–Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy 7 Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali–Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy Corresponding authors: Matteo Montagna ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Santiago-Blay | Received 20 November 2015 | Accepted 30 January 2016 | Published 9 June 2016 http://zoobank.org/4D7CCA18-26C4-47B0-9239-42C5F75E5F42 Citation: Magoga G, Sassi D, Daccordi M, Leonardi C, Mirzaei M, Regalin R, Lozzia G, Montagna M (2016) Barcoding Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy and biodiversity conservation in the Mediterranean Region. In: Jolivet P, Santiago-Blay J, Schmitt M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 6. ZooKeys 597: 27–38. doi: 10.3897/ zookeys.597.7241 Abstract The Mediterranean Region is one of the world’s biodiversity hot-spots, which is also characterized by high level of endemism.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Insect Species Which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists
    Conservation Biology Research Grants Program Division of Ecological Services © Minnesota Department of Natural Resources List of Insect Species which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists Final Report to the USFWS Cooperating Agencies July 1, 1996 Catherine Reed Entomology Department 219 Hodson Hall University of Minnesota St. Paul MN 55108 phone 612-624-3423 e-mail [email protected] This study was funded in part by a grant from the USFWS and Cooperating Agencies. Table of Contents Summary.................................................................................................. 2 Introduction...............................................................................................2 Methods.....................................................................................................3 Results.....................................................................................................4 Discussion and Evaluation................................................................................................26 Recommendations....................................................................................29 References..............................................................................................33 Summary Approximately 728 insect and allied species and subspecies were considered to be possible prairie specialists based on any of the following criteria: defined as prairie specialists by authorities; required prairie plant species or genera as their adult or larval food; were obligate predators, parasites
    [Show full text]