DOCSLIB.ORG

The Application of Summertime in Europe a Report to the European Commission Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport (DG MOVE)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Application of Summertime in Europe a Report to the European Commission Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport (DG MOVE) The application of summertime in Europe A report to the European Commission Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport (DG MOVE) 19 September 2014 Disclaimer ICF International presents a study on “The application of summertime in Europe”. This study was prepared by ICF International for the European Commission of the European Union ("the Commission"), Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport. The Commission holds the copyright of this report. Information published in this report can be reproduced only if reference is made to this report. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not represent any official view of the Commission. ICF International does not accept or assume any liability or duty of care for any other purpose or to any other party. ICF International shall not be liable in respect of any loss, damage or expense of whatsoever nature which may be caused by any use of this report. Summertime application in Europe The application of summertime in Europe A report to the European Commission Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport (DG MOVE) A report submitted by ICF Date: 19 September 2014 Job Number 30260247 ICF 6th Floor, Watling House 33 Cannon Street London EC4M 5SB T +44 (0)20 7611 1100 F +44 (0)20 3368 6960 www.icfi.com Final report i Summertime application in Europe Document Control Document Title The application of summertime in Europe Job number 30260247 Prepared by James Kearney, Stefania Chirico, Andrew Jarvis Checked by Andrew Jarvis Date 19 September 2014 Final report ii Summertime application in Europe Contents Executive summary ........................................................................................................... iv 1 Introduction .........................................................................................................1 1.1 Summertime, which began as a means of cutting energy use in time of war, became standard across Europe by the 1980s ..................................................................................... 1 1.2 The debate about summertime arrangements continues in some parts of Europe ................. 5 1.3 A majority of Member State governments do not see a case for changing summertime arrangements ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 The application of summertime is overlaid on the time zone policies of Member States ........ 6 1.5 The study conclusions are informed by desk research and stakeholder consultation ............ 7 1.6 Structure of the report .............................................................................................................. 8 2 The impact of summertime on business and the economy ....................................9 2.1 Agriculture ................................................................................................................................ 9 2.2 Transport ................................................................................................................................ 10 2.3 Energy .................................................................................................................................... 15 2.4 Tourism and Leisure .............................................................................................................. 18 2.5 Business sector ...................................................................................................................... 19 2.6 Other sectors .......................................................................................................................... 21 2.7 Summary ................................................................................................................................ 22 3 Citizen perspectives on the application of summertime....................................... 23 3.1 Public satisfaction .................................................................................................................. 23 3.2 Road safety ............................................................................................................................ 23 3.3 Health ..................................................................................................................................... 24 3.4 Crime ...................................................................................................................................... 25 3.5 Environment ........................................................................................................................... 26 3.6 Summary ................................................................................................................................ 27 4 Appraisal of summertime arrangements in the European Union .......................... 28 4.1 Member State governments views on strategies that might be adopted in the absence of Directive 2000/84/EC ............................................................................................................. 28 4.2 The scenarios ......................................................................................................................... 29 4.3 Scenario 1: A highly connected country moves out of sync for a short period each year ..... 30 4.4 Scenario 2: A less well connected country moves out of sync for a short period each year . 33 4.5 Scenario 3: A well connected country moves out of sync for an extended period each year ........................................................................................................................................ 35 4.6 Scenario 4: A less well connected country moves out of sync for an extended period of time ......................................................................................................................................... 38 4.7 Scenario 5: Two Member States move out of sync with the rest of Europe for a short period of time ......................................................................................................................... 40 4.8 Scenario 6: Three Member States move out of sync with the rest of Europe for a short period of time ......................................................................................................................... 42 4.9 Quantification of impacts and comparison between scenarios .............................................. 44 5 Conclusions ........................................................................................................ 48 Annex 1 References .............................................................................................. 51 Annex 2 Literature review methodology ............................................................... 55 Annex 3 Consultations .......................................................................................... 59 Annex 4 Sector data ............................................................................................. 61 Annex 5 Data for scenario analysis ........................................................................ 65 Final report iii Summertime application in Europe Executive summary At present summertime is applied on a harmonised basis across the European Union (EU). The objective of this study is to examine the implications, for the internal market, business and citizens of the application of summertime no longer being synchronised. Summertime arrangements have been widespread in Europe since the 1970s. They were introduced for the purposes of energy savings and increased time for leisure activities (through having longer daylight hours in the evenings), and then spread as countries coordinated their approach with that of their neighbours. At the end of the 1970s, all nine members of the European Economic Community had implemented summer time arrangements via their own national laws. However, a lack of alignment of these arrangements created problems for consumers and businesses. European policy measures began to be introduced, leading to the present day situation, where Directive 2000/84/EC requires Member States to put their clocks forward one hour on the last Sunday of March and change them back on the last Sunday of October each year. Similar summertime arrangements are observed by Turkey, Norway and Switzerland, all of which have aligned themselves to the EU’s summertime schedule. Summertime (also known as daylight saving time, DST) arrangements are also in place in the USA, Canada, New Zealand, Mexico, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay, and most territories in Australia. Countries which do not have summertime arrangements in place include Russia, China, Japan, India and Iceland. The effects of summertime arrangements can be split into two main categories: domestic (restricted to the country in question and trans-boundary (relating to the synchronisation of arrangements between countries). In general, the majority of responses to the stakeholder consultations conducted for this study, the Member State government responses to the survey, and the findings in the literature, related to the domestic impacts of summertime arrangements rather than the effects of asynchronous summertime arrangements within Europe. At a domestic level there is evidence of an association between summertime arrangements and activity in the tourism and leisure industry and also on crime reduction. There is stronger, albeit still mixed, evidence, of the effect of summertime arrangements on energy consumption. Some studies suggest
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Subject List
    (Distributed to the £ 250 1923. Members of the Council.) Geneva, April 26th, 1923. LEAGUE OF NATIONS SUBJECT LIST OF Documents distributed to the Members of the Council DURING THE YEAR 1922. (PREPARED BY THE DISTRIBUTION BRANCH) LEAGUE OF NATIONS SUBJECT LIST OF Documents distributed to the Members of the Council during the Year 1922. (Prepared by the Distribution Branch) A ALAND ISLANDS Convention concluded October 1921 at Geneva regarding non­ fortification and neutralisation of (C.419. M. 300.1921.) Letter dated April 13, 1922, from Secretary-General to States Members forwarding, on its coming into force C. L. 34. 1922 Note dated November 1922 by Secretary-General notifying Czechoslovakian Government's agreement to respect Officiai Journal, 3rd Year, No. 11, Part I, p. 1123. Ratification of Note dated September 1922 by Secretary-General giving, up to date, position of Official Journal, 3rd Year, No. 10, p. 1089. Report dated January 1922 by British Representative (Mr. Harmsworth) and resolution adopted at 16th Council Session agreeing to accept obligations provided for in Article 7 of, and requesting Secretary-General to forward this Convention to States Members, on its coming into force C. 37. M. 16. 1922. VII. ACCOUNTS, AUDITED See : Finances, League Budget, League ADMISSIONS TO LEAGUE Hungary Letter dated May 23, 1921, from Hungarian Government (Count Banffy) requesting admission A. 11. 1922. VII. A. 5. 1921. VII. Letter dated August 8, 1922, from Hungarian Govern­ ment (Count Bethlen) designating Count Banffy to under­ take necessary negotiations in connection with admission of A. 18. 1922. Letter dated September 18, 1922, from Hungarian Govern­ ment (Count Banffy) regarding certain questions raised in speech of Czechoslovak Delegate (M.
    [Show full text]
  • ICF International, Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): December 22, 2011 ICF International, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 001-33045 22-3661438 (State or other jurisdiction (Commission (I.R.S. Employer of incorporation) File Number) Identification Number) 9300 Lee Highway, Fairfax, Virginia 22031 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (703) 934-3000 Not Applicable (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions: ¨ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) ¨ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) ¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) ¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure On December 22, 2011, ICF International, Inc. (the “Company”) issued a press release in response to an Associated Press inquiry citing an announcement by the State of Louisiana’s Office of Community Development that it is seeking nearly $10 million from the Company as contractor on the Road Home program from June 2006 through June 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting the Most out of CHP Potential
    ICF QUICK TAKE Getting the Most Out of CHP Potential By Rick Tidball and Anne Hampson CHP Economics Driving Customer Demand Combined heat and power (CHP) plays a significant role in U.S. electricity generation—larger than many observers realize, but not anywhere near its potential. In 2014, approximately 4,400 CHP installations in the United States accounted for 12 percent of electricity production and 8 percent of power generation capacity—83 gigawatts. CHP deployment is poised to grow further in the near-to-medium term, due to increasingly compelling economics. A 10 megawatt (MW) system appropriate for many industrial and large commercial applications can reduce site energy costs by 47 percent and achieve economic payback in 3.7 years, even without including (potentially significant) tax credits or incentives (Table 1)1,2. The current low-cost environment for natural gas, which fuels 70 percent of CHP installations, is expected to be sustained in the coming years. ICF’s recent quarterly Natural Gas Strategic Forecast suggests that Henry Hub prices will rise to only $4.35/MMBtu (2014 dollars) in 2020 and remain below $5.50/MMBtu through 2030. Furthermore, there are parts of the United States (such as the Northeast and Midwest) that will continue to have lower gas prices than Henry Hub, due to shale gas production. In addition, the value of reduced emissions is expected to increase as new environmental regulations and policies are adopted, including state initiatives meant to enable greater deployment of distributed energy and the federal Clean Power Plan, which will put an implicit (or explicit) price on carbon.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Analysis of Methane Emission Reduction Opportunities in the U.S. Onshore Oil and Natural Gas Industries
    Economic Analysis of Methane Emission Reduction Opportunities in the U.S. Onshore Oil and Natural Gas Industries March 2014 Prepared for Environmental Defense Fund 257 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10010 Prepared by ICF International 9300 Lee Highway Fairfax, VA 22031 blank page Economic Analysis of Methane Emission Reduction Opportunities in the U.S. Onshore Oil and Natural Gas Industries Contents 1. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 1‐1 2. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 2‐1 2.1. Goals and Approach of the Study .............................................................................................. 2‐1 2.2. Overview of Gas Sector Methane Emissions ............................................................................. 2‐2 2.3. Climate Change‐Forcing Effects of Methane ............................................................................. 2‐5 2.4. Cost‐Effectiveness of Emission Reductions ............................................................................... 2‐6 3. Approach and Methodology ....................................................................................................... 3‐1 3.1. Overview of Methodology ......................................................................................................... 3‐1 3.2. Development of the 2011 Emissions Baseline ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Council
    UNITED NATIONS E Distr. Economic and Social GENERAL Council TRANS/1999/4 30 November 1998 Original: ENGLISH ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE (Sixty-first session, 8-11 February 1999, agenda item 12(c)) APPLICATION OF SUMMER TIME Note by the secretariat Introduction 1. Commission decisions concerning this subject appear in annexes 1-4. 2. Comments made and decisions taken within the framework of the fifty- second session of the Working Party on Rail Transport (5-7 October 1998) and the sixtieth session of the Inland Transport Committee (12-16 January 1998) are reproduced below. Inland Transport Committee 3. At its sixtieth session, the Committee learned from the representative of the European Commission that, according to the Eighth Directive of the European Parliament (EP) and of the EU Council (22 July 1997), a harmonized beginning and end of summer time had been determined in the European Union for the years 1998 to 2001, i.e. the last Sunday in March and the last Sunday in October. Please note that the distribution of documentation for the Inland Transport Committee (ITC) is no longer "restricted". Accordingly, the secretariat has adopted a new numbering system whereby all working documents will be numbered as follows: TRANS/year/serial number. Reports, provisional agendas, resolutions and major publications will continue to follow the previous numbering system (i.e. ECE/TRANS/124). GE.98- TRANS/1999/4 page 3 4. Bearing in mind the advantages of common dates for the application of summer time for ECE member countries, the Committee, supporting the position of the Working Party, urged Governments to ensure also in future a harmonized beginning and end of summer time in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Katrina and the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement
    Hurricane Katrina and the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement A GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE ON A NATIONAL DISASTER By Chris Kromm and Sue Sturgis Institute for Southern Studies January 2008 SPECIAL REPORT volume xxxvi, no. 1 & 2, 2008 Hurricane Katrina and the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement is a special report by the Institute for Southern Studies and Southern Exposure, produced in collaboration with the Brookings-Bern Project on Internally Displaced Persons at the Brookings Institution. Special thanks to the following for their assistance in the creation of this report: Elizabeth Ferris and Khalid Koser with the Brookings-Bern Project; Monique Harden and Nathalie Walker of Advocates for Environmental Human Rights in New Orleans; Ajamu Baraka and Tonya Williams of the U.S. Human Rights Network; Malcolm Suber of the People’s Hurricane Relief Fund and Oversight Coalition; and Walter Kälin, Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General on Internally Displaced Persons. The views expressed in this report are those of the report’s co-authors. Thank you to the following foundations for their support of the Institute’s Gulf Watch project: the Gulf Coast Fund of Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors, Jewish Funds for Justice, Oxfam America, and Skyline Public Works, as well as individual supporters of the Institute’s Bob Hall Investigative Fund. Southern Exposure is published twice a year by the Institute for Southern Studies, a non-profit research and education center founded in 1970 to advance democracy and justice in the South. For ongoing coverage of the Gulf Coast and other issues of Southern interest, please visit the Institute website: www.southernstudies.org Report design by Jan Martell © 2008 Institute for Southern Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD .
    [Show full text]
  • COUNCIL of EUROPE CONSEIL DE L'europe COMMITTEE of MINISTERS CONFIDENTIAL CM/Del/Concl(79)
    COUNCIL CONSEIL OF EUROPE DE L'EUROPE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS CONFIDENTIAL CM/Del/Concl(79)312 CONCLUSIONS OF THE 312th MEETING OF THE MINISTERS' DEPUTIES HELD IN STRASBOURG FROM 10 TO 14 DECEMBER 1979 STRASBOURG CONFIDENTIAL - i - CM/Del/Concl(79)312 SUMMARY Page 1. Adoption of the agenda 5 2. State of written procedures 7 Political and General Policy Questions 3. Committee of Ministers - Follow-up to the 65th Session 9 4. 2nd Medium-Term Plan 13 5. Situation in Cyprus 21 6. Missing political prisoners in Chile - Recommendation 868 and Order No. 381 23 7. Action taken on Assembly Recommendations and on relations with the Committee of Ministers - Recommendation 871 and Order No. 383 25 Human Rights 8. Ad hoc Committee of Experts for the Follow-up to the Declaration on Human Rights (CAHDH) - Report 27 9. Election of 5 Judges to the European Court of Human Rights (in respect of Denmark, France, Ireland, Iceland and Switzerland) - Nomination of candidates 29 10. European Commission of Human Rights - Election of a member in respect of Spain 31 11. Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Airey case - Application of Article 54 of the European Convention on Human Rights 33 CONFIDENTIAL CM3del/Concl(79)312 - ii - Page Legal Questions 12. Conventions and Agreements concluded within the framework of the Council of Europe - Model final clauses 35 13. Terrorism in Europe - Recommendation 852 39 14. Peaceful settlement of disputes - Recommendation 878 45 Economic and Social Questions 15. Steering Committee for Social Security (CDSS) - Report of the 8th meeting (Athens, 25-28 September 1979) 49 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Q1 2018 ICF International Inc Earnings Call on May 02, 2018 / 8
    Client Id: 77 THOMSON REUTERS STREETEVENTS EDITED TRANSCRIPT ICFI - Q1 2018 ICF International Inc Earnings Call EVENT DATE/TIME: MAY 02, 2018 / 8:30PM GMT THOMSON REUTERS STREETEVENTS | www.streetevents.com | Contact Us ©2018 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Thomson Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. 'Thomson Reuters' and the Thomson Reuters logo are registered trademarks of Thomson Reuters and its affiliated companies. Client Id: 77 MAY 02, 2018 / 8:30PM, ICFI - Q1 2018 ICF International Inc Earnings Call CORPORATE PARTICIPANTS James C. Morgan ICF International, Inc. - CFO & Executive VP John Wasson ICF International, Inc. - President and COO Lynn Morgen AdvisIRy Partners Sudhakar Kesavan ICF International, Inc. - Executive Chairman & CEO CONFERENCE CALL PARTICIPANTS Christian Francisco Herbosa NOBLE Capital Markets, Inc., Research Division - Government Services and Defense Technology Associate Analyst Joseph Anthony Vafi Loop Capital Markets LLC, Research Division - Analyst Kevin Mark Steinke Barrington Research Associates, Inc., Research Division - MD Lucy Guo Cowen and Company, LLC, Research Division - VP Timothy John McHugh William Blair & Company L.L.C., Research Division - Partner & Global Services Analyst Tobey O'Brien Sommer SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc., Research Division - MD PRESENTATION Operator Welcome to the ICF International First Quarter 2018 Results Conference Call. My name is Vanessa, and I will be your operator for today's call. (Operator Instructions) As a reminder, this conference is being recorded on Wednesday, May 2, 2018, and cannot be reproduced or rebroadcast without permission from the company. I will now turn the program over to Lynn Morgen of AdvisIRy Partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Masterclock, Inc. Gmr1000 and Gmr5000 User Manual
    MASTERCLOCK, INC. GMR1000 AND GMR5000 USER MANUAL STAND ALONE GMR1000 1 (OPTIONAL FEATURES SHOWN) RACK MOUNT GMR5000 (OPTIONAL FEATURES SHOWN) Masterclock GMR User Manual v2 – 2016.12 Table of Contents The GMR1000 and GMR5000 are high- DISCLAIMER ........................................................................................... 3 precision time and frequency reference DATA SHEETS ......................................................................................... 4 devices. They serve the needs of INTRODUCTION..................................................................................... 10 commercial establishments, industry, military and laboratory environments. STANDARD FEATURES ........................................................................... 11 NTP, GPS, NMEA, NENA, Time Code, 10 OPTIONAL FEATURES ............................................................................ 12 MHZ, IEEE 1588 PTP, PPS, PPO, and high- stability oscillator options are available. BACK PANEL INTERFACES ...................................................................... 15 CONFIGURATION OPTIONS .................................................................... 16 PASSWORD PROTECTION ...................................................................... 16 Thank you for your purchase of a GMR UTC TIME REFERENCE ............................................................................ 16 precision time and frequency reference DHCP AUTO-CONFIGURATION ............................................................... 17 system
    [Show full text]
  • Director of Ceremonies Members of the Association of Portuguese Entrepreneurs Distinguished Captains of Industry Ladies and Gentlemen
    REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA STATEMENT BY H.E. FRIEDA NANGULA ITHETE, AMBASSADOR OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA TO THE REPUBLIC OF PORTUGAL, AT THE BUSINESS FORUM CO-ORGANISED BY THE ASSOCIATION OF PORTUGUESE ENTREPRENEURS (AEP) AND THE HONORARY CONSULATE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA IN PORTO, PORTUGAL 06 JULY 2016 PORTO Director of Ceremonies Members of the Association of Portuguese Entrepreneurs Distinguished captains of industry Ladies and Gentlemen Good Afternoon. Let me at the outset to sincerely thank the Association of Portuguese Entrepreneurs (AEP) and our Honorary Consulate for organising this important meeting. In the same vein, let me also take this opportunity to thank all of you for finding time out of your busy schedules, to be here with us this afternoon. Before I make my brief remarks, I would like to introduce the members of my delegation. I am accompanied by Ms. Bernadette Artivor, Executive Director of Namibia Investment Centre and Deputy Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Industrialisation, Trade and SMEs Development, Mr. Jakova Katuamba, Chief Trade Promotion Executive from the Namibia Investment Centre, which is the investment promotion Agency of the Ministry of Industrialization, Trade and SME Development of our country. I am also accompanied by Mr. Tarah Shaanika, the Chief Executive Officer of the Namibia Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Ms. Maureen Posthuma, Director for Europe of Namibia Tourism Board; as well as Ms. Zaskia McNab, Second Secretary, and Mr. Mohamed Saleh, Trade Promotion Officer at the Embassy of Namibia. It is an honour and privilege for us to be accorded this opportunity to interact and share with you about the investment and business opportunities that Namibia offers which have the potential to enhance trade and economic cooperation between our two countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Casualties of Katrina.Pdf
    A CORPWATCH REPORT BY ELIZA STRICKLAND AND AZIBUIKE AKABA CASUALTIES OF KATRINA GULF COAST RECONSTRUCTION TWO YEARS AFTER THE HURRICANE AUGUST 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . .1 PART ONE: RETURNING HOME . .2 Back on the Bayou: Electricity & Energy . .2 Insurance: State Farm . .4 “Road Home” Program . .6 Trailer Parks and Tarps: The Shaw Group and Fluor . .8 PART TWO: REPAIRING THE REGION . .10 Levees: Moving Water . .10 Debris: Surrounded by Dumps . .13 Refineries: Cleaning Up Big with Hurricane Aid . .15 Mulching the Cypress Swamps . .17 PART THREE: REVIVAL? . .18 Casinos: Gambling Bonanza . .18 Labor: Exploiting Migrants, Ignoring Locals . .19 Small Business Contracts . .21 Reconsidering the Rush to Rebuild the Big Easy . .23 ENDNOTES . .26 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . .29 Cover images: Chef Menteur protest. Photo by Darryl Malek-Wiley, Sierra Club Sacred Heart Academy High School students demonstrate for levee repairs, January 2006. Photo by Greg Henshall, FEMA Housing Authority of New Orleans protest, August 2007. Photo: New Orleans Indymedia Aerial of flooded neighborhood in New Orleans. Photo by Jocelyn Augustino, FEMA This page: Flood water pumps in Marin, Louisiana. Photo by Marvin Nauman, FEMA HOUSTON, WE HAVE A PROBLEM New Orleans, September 4, 2005. Photo by Jocelyn Augustino, FEMA INTRODUCTION This CorpWatch report by Eliza Strickland and Azibuike Akaba tells the story of corporate malfeasance and government incompetence two years after Hurricane Katrina struck New Orleans. This is our second report—Big, Easy Money by Rita J. King was the first—and it digs into a slew of new scandals. We have broken the report up into three parts: the struggle at the electricity and timber companies who have taken by ordinary residents to return home, the major effort to fix advantage of the emergency aid to expand, rather than limit, the broken Gulf Coast infrastructure, and finally—what the the impact of their environmentally destructive businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • ICF INTERNATIONAL, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K (Mark One) x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 Commission File Number: 001-33045 ICF INTERNATIONAL, INC. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 22-3661438 (State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer incorporation or organization) Identification Number) 9300 Lee Highway Fairfax, VA 22031 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (703) 934-3000 Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Name of Exchange on which Registered Common Stock, $0.001 par value The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
    [Show full text]