The Faculty 1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Symposia on Gender, Race and Philosophy
oppressor to oppressed, rather than conceptualizing it as a “discursive space in which subjectivity, identity, and meaning Symposia on Gender, Race and are created, dispersed, and interpreted” (140) Finally, it Philosophy misrepresents subjectivity as a prepolitical entity with pre- given interests rather than understanding the subject as a Volume 3, number 3. September 2007 sociohistorically constituted entity whose interests are http://web.mit.edu/sgrp “formed in the thick of politics” (143). I agree wholeheartedly with McAfee’s critical claims about the importance of moving beyond an overly simplistic dyadic model of oppressions as a one-way transmission of power. I Multiple Feminisms am also generally quite sympathetic to her vision for feminist Commentary on Noëlle McAfee’s “Two Feminisms” politics, particularly to her emphasis on the public sphere as a site for the deconstruction, negotiation, and reconstruction of identity. This is a point that is all too often overlooked by AMY ALLEN Department of Philosophy feminists who are interested in the so-called problem of the 6035 Thornton Hall subject.1 Since I find myself largely in agreement with the Dartmouth College motivating assumptions of the essay, in what follows I will Hanover, NH 03755 focus mainly on the details of her critical analysis of the USA situation of contemporary feminism. These reflections will [email protected] lead me in the end to raise a critical question about McAfee’s positive alternative vision for feminism. My first question about McAfee’s diagnosis of feminist In her bold and provocative paper, Noëlle McAfee argues politics concerns her equation the broad agonal conception of against a version of feminism that understands politics in politics – according to which politics is centrally concerned terms of oppression and struggle, and for another feminism with struggle – with the much narrower view of politics as that conceives of politics instead in terms of the sociosymbolic the self-interested struggle over resources. -
Decolonizing Ethics Penn State Series in Critical Theory Eduardo Mendieta, General Editor
Decolonizing Ethics Penn State Series in Critical Theory Eduardo Mendieta, General Editor The Penn State Series in Critical Theory showcases the work of contemporary critical theorists who are building upon and expanding the canon of the Frankfurt School. Based on a series of symposia held at Penn State University, each volume in the series contains an original essay by an internationally renowned critical theorist, followed by a set of critical essays from a number of authors as well as the theorist’s response to these essays. Books in the series will focus especially on topics that have been previously neglected by the Frankfurt tradition, including colonialism and imperialism, racism, sexism, and ethnocentrism. They offer analyses and readings that show the continuing relevance of one of the most innovative intellectual traditions of the last century. Other books in the series: Amy Allen and Eduardo Mendieta, eds., From Alienation to Forms of Life: The Critical Theory of Rahel Jaeggi Amy Allen and Eduardo Mendieta, eds., Justification and Emancipation: The Critical Theory of Rainer Forst Decolonizing Ethics The Critical Theory of Enrique Dussel Edited by Amy Allen and Eduardo Mendieta The Pennsylvania State University Press University Park, Pennsylvania Portions of chapter 3 previously appeared in Linda Alcoff, “The Hegel of Coyoacán,” in boundary 2 45, no. 4 (2018): 183– 202. Copyright, 2018, Duke University Press. All rights reserved. Republished by permission of the copyright holder, Duke University Press. www .dukeupress .edu Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Names: Allen, Amy, 1970– editor. | Mendieta, Eduardo, editor. Title: Decolonizing ethics : the critical theory of Enrique Dussel / edited by Amy Allen and Eduardo Mendieta. -
Spain's Texas Patriots ~ Its 1779-1,783 War with England During the American Revolution
P SPAIN'S TEXAS PATRIOTS ~ ITS 1779-1,783 WAR WITH ENGLAND DURING THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION PART 5 OF SPANISH BORDERLANDS STUDIES by Granville W. and N. C. Hough P ! i ! © Copyright 2000 1 by Granville W. and N. C. Hough 3438 Bahia Blanea West, Apt B Lagtma Hills, CA 92653-2830 Email: [email protected] Other books in this series include: Spain's California Patriots in its 1779-1783 War with England - During the American Revolution, Part 1, 1998. Spain's California Patriots in its 1779-1783 War with England - During the American Revolution, Part 2, 1999. Spain's Arizona Patriots in its 1779-1783 War with England - During the Amencan Revolution, Third Study of the Spanish Borderlands, 1999. Spain's New Mexico Patriots in its 1779-1783 War with England - During the.American Revolution, Fourth Study of the Spanish Borderlands, 1999. Published by: SHHAR PRESS Society of Hispanic Historical and Ancestral Research , P.O. Box 490 Midway City, CA 92655°0490 (714) 894-8161 Email: SHHARP~s~aol.com ;.'."/!';h',-:/.t!j.:'."-i ;., : [::.'4"!".': PREFACE o In 1996, the authors became aware that neither the NSDAR (National Society for the Daughters of the American Revolution) nor the NSSAR (National Society for the Sons of the American Revolution) would accept descendants of Spanish citi~e,qs of California who had contributed funds to defray expenses of the 1779-1783 war with England. As the patriots being turned down as suitable ancestors were also soldiers, the obvious question became: "Why base your membership application on a monetary contribution when the ancestor soldier had put.his life at stake?" This led to a study of how the Spani~a Army and Navy ~ad worked during the war to defeat the :~'. -
FACULTY Dates Listed in Parentheses Indicate Year of Tenure-Track Appoint- Chiara D
FACULTY Dates listed in parentheses indicate year of tenure-track appoint- Chiara D. Bacigalupa (2007) ment to Sonoma State University. Associate Professor, Literacy, Elementary, and Early Education List as of September 26, 2014 B.A. 1987, University of California, Santa Cruz M.A. 1991, California State University, Northridge Judith E. Abbott (1991) Ph.D. 2005, University of Minnesota Professor, History B.A. 1970, University of Minnesota Christina N. Baker (2008) M.A. 1977, Ph.D. 1989, University of Connecticut Associate Professor, American Multicultural Studies B.A. 2000, University of California, Los Angeles Emily E. Acosta Lewis (2013) M.A. 2003, Ph.D. 2007, University of California, Irvine Assistant Professor, Communication Studies B.A. 2005, California State University, San Diego Jeffrey R. Baldwin (2009) M.A. 2008, Ph.D. 2012, University of Wisconsin-Madison Associate Professor, Geography and Global Studies B.A. 1979, M.A. 1998, Ph.D. 2003, University of Oregon Theresa Alfaro-Velcamp (2003) Professor, History Melinda C. Barnard (1990) B.A. 1989, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Associate Vice President for Faculty Affairs, M.S. 1990, London School of Economics and Political Science and Chief Research Officer M.A. 1995, Ph.D. 2001, Georgetown University Professor, Communication Studies B.A. 1975, Ph.D. 1986, Stanford University Ruben Armiñana (1992) M.A. 1976, Harvard University President, Sonoma State University; Professor, Political Science A.A. 1966, Hill College Edward J. Beebout (2007) B.A. 1968, M.A. 1970, University of Texas at Austin Associate Professor, Communication Studies Ph.D. 1983, University of New Orleans B.A. 1981, Humboldt State University M.S. -
Disciplinary and Other FINRA Actions Reported for June 2009
Disciplinary and Other FINRA Actions Firm Expelled, Individual Sanctioned Reported for June 2009 Windham Securities, Inc. (CRD® #20529, New York, New York) and Joshua Constantin (CRD #3221893, Registered Principal, Huntington, New York) submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in which the firm was expelled from FINRATM membership and Constantin was barred from FINRA has taken disciplinary actions association with any FINRA member in any capacity. Without admitting or against the following firms and denying the findings, the firm and Constantin consented to the described individuals for violations of FINRA sanctions and to the entry of findings that they refused to allow FINRA rules; federal securities laws, rules staff to enter the firm’s branch office to examine the firm’s books and and regulations; and the rules of records, and to otherwise conduct an on-site examination. The findings the Municipal Securities Rulemaking stated that the firm and Constantin failed to respond to FINRA requests Board (MSRB). for documents and information, and the firm, acting through Constantin, failed to maintain and preserve numerous books and records required pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4, and NASD® Rule 3110. The findings also stated that the firm and Windham have not established the existence of the vast majority of the books and records that the firm is required to make and preserve. (FINRA Case #2009016318001) Firm and Individual Fined Paulson Investment Company, Inc., (CRD #5670, Portland, Oregon) and Trent Donald Davis (CRD #2137171, Registered Principal, Lake Oswego, Oregon) submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in which the firm and Davis were censured, fined $10,000, jointly and severally, and required to provide certification that the firm has complied with SEC Rule 15c2-4 to FINRA within 10 business days of the closing of all contingent offerings conducted by the firm during the 12 months following acceptance of this AWC. -
1 Leslie A. Dechurch, Phd Professor School Of
1 LESLIE A. DECHURCH, PHD PROFESSOR SCHOOL OF COMMUNICATION I. EMPLOYMENT HISTORY II. EARNED DEGREES III. HONORS AND AWARDS IV. RESEARCH, SCHOLARSHIP, AND CREATIVE ACTIVITIES A. REFEREED PUBLICATIONS AND SUBMITTED ARTICLES A1. Published and Accepted Journal Articles B. PUBLISHED BOOKS, BOOK CHAPTERS, EDITED VOLUMES, & PROCEEDINGS B1. Refereed Book Chapters B2. Edited Volume B3. Conference Proceedings (Refereed) B4. Other Refereed Material C. OTHER PUBLICATIONS AND CREATIVE PRODUCTS Commissioned Study (non-refereed) Commissioned Papers (non-refereed) Software Development Projects (non-refereed) D. PRESENTATIONS D1. Keynote Presentations D2. Invited Presentations D3. Refereed Presentations E. GRANTS AND CONTRACTS E1. As Principal Investigator E2. As Co-Principal Investigator E3. As Senior Personnel or Contributor F. OTHER SCHOLARLY AND CREATIVE ACCOMPLISHMENTS G. SOCIETAL AND POLICY IMPACTS H. Other Professional Activities V. TEACHING A. COURSES TAUGHT B. INDIVIDUAL STUDENT GUIDANCE C. OTHER TEACHING ACTIVITIES VI. SERVICE 2 I. EMPLOYMENT HISTORY 2016 - present Professor of Communication Studies, School of Communication, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL; Courtesy appointment in Psychology, Weinberg College of Arts & Sciences 2011 - 2016 Associate Professor of Psychology, School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA Promoted to Professor in March, 2016 2007 – 2011 Assistant Professor of Industrial & Organizational Psychology Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL Awarded Tenure and Promoted to Associate Professor in May, 2011 2003 - 2007 Assistant Professor of Industrial & Organizational Psychology Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL II. EARNED DEGREES Ph.D. 2002 Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA M.S. 2000 Industrial & Organizational Psychology B.S. 1996 University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA Environmental Science, General Honors III. -
Lessons from the Young Marx ✉ Gianfranco Casuso 1
ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00813-x OPEN The epistemic foundations of injustice: lessons from the Young Marx ✉ Gianfranco Casuso 1 This article intends to show to what extent the early Marxian categories of alienation, ideology and proletariat can serve to better understand current forms of epistemic injustice, as well as, conversely, how the latter can illuminate some unclear aspects of such concepts. fi ’ 1234567890():,; In the rst part, it will be explained the extent to which Marx s concept of alienation accounts for the experience of an individual in a world to whose norms she is subject, but which she cannot recognise as her own. It will be shown that Marx finds the answer in a form of emancipatory praxis linked to a transformative appropriation of social reality. In order to deepen the understanding of this idea of emancipation, the second part will analyse the Marxian concept of the proletariat. It will be argued that taking up some considerations about the Hegelian figure of the rabble, Marx distinguishes a “liberal” from a “human” form of emancipation. In the third part, a contemporary example will be used to show the usefulness of the young Marx’s analyses concerning this dimension of emancipation struggles. In the fourth part, these ideas will be developed further through the concept of epistemic injustice, which has gained great importance in the recent studies that Critical Theory carries out of the different socio-epistemic blocks of an ideological nature that prevent articulating, commu- nicating and overcoming negative experiences that hinder individual self-realisation. -
Comments on Colin Koopman's Genealogy As Critique Amy Allen
Amy Allen 2014 ISSN: 1832‐5203 Foucault Studies, No. 18, pp. 238‐244, October 2014 REVIEW ESSAY The Normative and the Transcendental: Comments on Colin Koopman’s Genealogy as Critique Amy Allen, Dartmouth College Colin Koopman’s Genealogy as Critique: Foucault and the Problems of Modernity1 is an ambitious and exciting book that makes significant contributions to the now vast secondary literature on Foucault, and to the ongoing Foucault‐Habermas “debate.” Despite Foucault’s enormous in‐ fluence across multiple disciplines, his philosophical method, according to Koopman, has all too often been misunderstood not only by his harshest critics but also by his most ardent sup‐ porters. Hence, Koopman proposes a wholesale revision of our understanding of Foucault’s work, a revision that turns on two fundamental issues: first, rethinking Foucault’s relationship to Kant’s notion of critique; and, second, re‐interpreting Foucault’s oeuvre through the lens of the master concept of problematization. Re‐reading Foucault’s work in light of these two is‐ sues allows us to see not only how his diverse writings hang together as a consistent whole but also how his work provides a valuable and effective model of historico‐philosophical cri‐ tique that has much more in common with the traditions of American pragmatism and Ger‐ man critical theory than it does with some of the French and Italian philosophers—Derrida and Agamben, particularly—with whom Foucault is more often associated. To my mind, the most impressive and significant achievements of this book are two‐ fold: first, the interpretive re‐reading of Foucault’s oeuvre through the lens of problematiza‐ tion and, second, the related constructive articulation of a Foucaultian model of critique as problematization. -
Psychoanalysis and the Methodology of Critique Amy Allen Department of Philosophy Penn State University Forthcoming in Constellations, June 2016
Psychoanalysis and the Methodology of Critique Amy Allen Department of Philosophy Penn State University Forthcoming in Constellations, June 2016 In his introduction to Eros and Civilization, Herbert Marcuse distinguishes his philosophy of psychoanalysis from psychoanalytic therapy by explaining that the former aims “not at curing individual sickness, but at diagnosing the general disorder.”1 With this claim, Marcuse expresses a thought that has run through first, second, and third generation critical theory, in different ways, namely, that the methodology of critical theory can be understood as somehow analogous to psychoanalytic technique. This analogy holds that the critical theorist stands in relation to the pathological social order as the analyst stands in relation to the analysand, and that the aim of critical theory is to effect the diagnosis and, ultimately, the cure of social disorders or pathologies. This idea was famously developed in careful detail in Jürgen Habermas’s early work, Knowledge and Human Interests.2 There, Habermas defined psychoanalysis as a science of “methodical self-reflection” (KHI, 214), that is, as a form of depth hermeneutics that aims to analyze those aspects of the self that have been alienated from the self and yet remain a part of it. In other words, it aims to analyze what Freud once referred to as the “internal foreign territory” of the unconscious.3 In KHI, Habermas understood the individual psyche in communicative terms; hence, for him, unconscious wishes are those that have been “exclude[d]from public communication,” or “delinguisticized” (KHI, 224), but that continue to disrupt the subject’s communication with him or herself in the form of dreams, slips of the tongue, and other interruptions (KHI, 227). -
Domination and Global Political Justice
Domination and Global Political Justice Domination consists in subjection to the will of others and manifests itself both as a personal relation and a structural phenomenon serving as the context for relations of power. Domination has again become a central political concern through the revival of the republican tradition of politi cal thought (not to be confused with the US political party). However, normative debates about domination have mostly remained limited to the context of domestic politics. Also, the republican debate has not fully taken into account alternative ways of conceptualizing domination. Critical theorists, liberals, feminists, critical race theorists, and postcolonial writers have discussed domination in different ways, focusing on such problems as imperialism, racism, and the subjection of indigenous peoples. This volume extends debates about domination to the global level and considers how other streams in political theory and nearby disciplines enrich, expand upon, and critique the republican tradition's contributions to the debate. This vol ume brings together, for the first time, mostly original pieces on domination and global political justice by some of this generation's most prominent scholars, including Philip Pettit, James Bohman, Rainer Forst, Amy Allen, John McCormick, Thomas McCarthy, Charles Mills, Duncan lvison, John Maynor, Terry Macdonald, Stefan Gosepath, and Hauke Brunkhorst. Barbara Buckinx is Associate Research Scholar in the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University, US. Her work has appeared in Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Ethics and International Affairs, and Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric. Jonathan Trejo-Mathys is- Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Boston Col lege, US. -
Amy ALLEN, the End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory
Amy ALLEN, The end of progress: decolonizing the normative foundations of critical theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015, 304 págs. O que diz as entrelinhas da teoria crítica vinculada à Escola de Frankfurt? Mais especificamente, quem é o “nós” a que as teorias de frankfurtianos como Jürgen Habermas, Axel Honneth ou Rainer Forst se referem? Ou, invertida a questão, o que essas teorias pensam sobre o “outro do nós”, aqueles que não cabem nas refe- ridas críticas, sejam elas internas ou externas? O livro em questão, escrito pela filó- sofa norte-americana Amy Allen, trata, de maneira densa e complexa, sobre o que hoje é interpretado como uma guinada conservadora ou restauradora na teoria crí- tica vinculada à Escola de Frankfurt. Aqueles que recorrem às teorias de Haber- mas, Honneth ou Forst para pensar sobre crítica econômica, questões de gênero, colonizações e imperialismos contemporâneos pode até não se decepcionar com- pletamente, mas fatalmente terá que recorrer a outros autores para tornar a pró- pria análise mais produtiva. Até a publicação de The end of progress pela Columbia University Press, nenhum autor tinha conseguido analisar e criticar tão bem o que soa para muitos comentadores dos trabalhos de Habermas, Honneth ou Forst como problemático: a pouca capacidade crítica de suas críticas sociais. O caminho encontrado por Allen para analisar esta despotencialização da críti- ca na teoria crítica de matiz frankfurtiana é plausível e bastante bem-fundamen- tado. Allen defende, em seu livro, que o principal problema dessas teorias é que o modo pelo qual as suas normas são ancoradas é refém de perspectivas eurocên- tricas. -
The Limits of Amy Allen's Analysis of Gender Subordination in The
Este artigo está licenciado sob forma de uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional, que permite uso irrestrito, distribuição e reprodução em qualquer meio, desde que a publicação original seja corretamente citada. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR e-ISSN 1984-6746 http://dx.doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2018.1.27903 The limits of Amy Allen's analysis of gender subordination in The Politics of Our Selves Os limites da análise de Amy Allen sobre a subordinação de gênero em The Politics of Our Selves Yara Frateschi1 Abstract: In this article, I argue that Amy Allen’s approach of gender issues in The Politics of Our Selves is precarious and partial insofar as it is focused on an analysis of subjection aiming to explain “how subordinated individuals come to be psychically invested in and attached to their subornation” 2. Although this is an undeniable aspect of gender subordination, it does not tackle the complexity of its symbolic and material causes. My main thesis is that Allen does not offer the best model for feminist Critical Theory in light of the complexities of capitalist societies, much less to the feminist struggles in the Global South, deeply marked by poverty, social inequality, racism and all sorts of violence against women. Key-words: Amy Allen, Gender Subordination, Critical Theory, Habermas, Foucault Resumo: Neste artigo, argumento que a abordagem de Amy Allen a respeito da questão de gênero em The Politics of Our Selves é precária e parcial na medida em que é focada em uma análise da sujeição que visa explicar “como indivíduos subordinados se tornam psiquicamente atados à sua própria subordinação”.