Geologic Map Compilation of the Pocatello 30 X 60 Minute Quadrangle, Idaho

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geologic Map Compilation of the Pocatello 30 X 60 Minute Quadrangle, Idaho IDAHO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TECHNICAL REPORT 99-2 MOSCOW-BOISE-POCATELLO LINK AND STANFORD Qc Ql Qm Qs Ql Qc QTfg pIPc Qtg QTr Tsup Qc Qal Ql Og PIPw TRtu Ql QTfg Qtg Qls Og Qc TRd QTr Ql Mmc 17 Tslr Tsud Qal Qal Qal Ql 40 45 Tsud 23 Tsu Qc Mmc 35 20 pIPm QTfg Qbh Qbh Tsud 68 C– sw C– sw Qal Qal 60 Qfg OC– su Ql Qc Og Tsud Tsud 14 Zcl 38 C– Zc Qc 45 Os Qc Tsud TRd Ql C– n Og 25 pIPc Qm Qal Zi Qc – C– sw OC– su QTr Zcu C– g OCsu 55 Os pIPm Qtg Ql 73 C– sw Os Og Mlf Tb 15 13 45 C– n Qal Tsud 68 C– sw 40 C– sw Qfg 35 C– e 35 Tsud 31 Ql Tb – C– n QTr Zcl C– Zc C– e Cbo C– n QTfg Qbh Dh 48 32 C– sw Tsub 51 40 Tsud 51 C– n C– sw Os Qam 80 Qc C– n Sl 32 C– e Tsu Mlf Dh Ql 52 C– e C– Zc C– g Qfg Tsub Qls OC– su Qfg – 75 Qc Csw Ts Ts Qal Qc 29 Ml Qam Ql 34 Qc 35 Ql Qm Ml Ql Of C– Zc Qtg Qc Zm 56 18 Mlf Tsub 60 Zm 25 20 Qal Qtg Qm 19 Ts Tsud Qal 25 Mlf 26 Qal Zcu C– Zc C– g 24 Qfg Qm C– Zc Qbh Tsu Ts Qtg Zcl Zi Qc Zm C– bo Ql Ts 11 Qtg Tsub Zi Zm Tsud Qal C– n Qc 35 Zm 32 40 Qam Qam 40 C– Zc C– g Zi C– bo C– sw 35 33 Qfg C– n 25 Qm Ts Ql C– g 13 28 – Zm Zm 29 Zm Qm C– e CZc C– Zc Tsud Qbh Tsub Qc C– g 10 40 – C– Zc Qm Qtg CZc Zm 25 Qal Ql Ql 40 30 16 Tsud 31 32 Qtg 52 27 Tsma Qtg Tsud – C– e Ce Zcu Ql Tsu Zi Qc 20 C– Zc 26 Qfg Qc Zm 25 Zm Zm 29 Qfg Qm Tsud Qc C– g Qal Zm 28 34 Qc Qfg Ql Zm Zcu C– Zc 30 35 Zm Qtg Tsu Tsud 21 Qfg C– e 30 Qm Qtg C– e Ql Ql Qbh C– ls Tsud C– g Zi Zm Tsud Tsud Tsub C– g Zcl C– g 27 Qal Ql Zm Zcl C– Zc Qal Ql 24 Qls Qc Zcu C– Zc Qc 20 Zm Qal 30 C– g Tsuc Zcl Zpu Qfg Qtg Ql Ql Zi Zcu Zm Zc Qfg 42 Zi Qc Qc 35 Qc Ql – C– e C– Zc Qam Ql Zcl Qc CZc 25 Qtg Qal Qfg Qal Zpb 30 45 C– g 30 Ql Qc Ql C– g 15 Ql Zps Ql Zi 30 18 QTfg Qfg Zc Zcl Qfg Zm 25 15 25 Tsup 68 15 C– Zc Zm Qtg 25 Qfg Zc Zpu 63 53 Zcl 65 71 Zm 50 17 Zm Qc – 8 Qs Qm Ql Ql CZc 17 Zi Qam Ql 42 – Tsud Qc 68 CZc Zi Os Ql Ql Zcu 60 QTfg Qc Qbh Tsup C– Zc Zm Zcu Zm Qfg Ql Zc Zc Zcl 18 QTfg 18 Ql 33 55 C– g Zm Tsur C– g Zcl C– e Zi 49 Qm Qm 18 Tsuc Zpu 37 35 C– bo C– n 27 Q Og Q Ql Ql 33 Zcu Zb Ql 40 56 C– g C– e Zps Ql Ql Zi Ql Qm 40 C– Zc Zm 24 17 T Qc 30 36 C– n Qbh 31 Zcl S U 29 – 45 68 20 Zi 26 OCs Ts Ts C– Zc 21 Zpb R 47 Zcl 35 13 C– Zc 17 Zcl Zm Zcl Zcl 34 H Zm C– Zc T C– bo Zb 33 20 C– Zc Ts Q 40 Ql Zcu 38 C– g Qfg 36 Zi C– g 37 C– g 35 62 35 Zpa 54 C– Zc 34 37 33 C– n 6 C– g Zpu 22 Zi C– g OC– s 21 Qal Ql 32 Zcu 22 C– Zc Zpu Zcl Zm C– e Zm C– Zc – 32 Ts Ts Ql Qtg Ql 25 Ql 31 C– g Ce Ql Ql Qfg 37 32 Zcl 19 32 34 50 Ql Zm 20 C– e 60 Zpb – Zcl 38 15 12 Qs Zcu CZc 87 THRUST 26 – Qfg 19 79 Zcu Zm – C– bo CZc Qal 36 24 35 Cbo OC– su – 18 Q Q 20 24 Qfg 26 37 CZc 64 Zpa CANYON Zm 62 45 39 30 C– g Ql 54 Ql 30 25 Zcu C– e OC– s 11 40 Zm Zps 12 26 C– e C– e Zpa Zcl Zps Zb Zb 23 BEAR 55 Ql 8 Qtg Zpa Zcu Zpb 22 Zpu 54 Zcl Zcu Qc Q Tslb Ql 54 Zcu 11 C– e 25 Zpa 22 C– sw N Q Ql 39 11 Zi 40 Zcl – Tslr Ql 65 52 22 C– g Cn C– e C– g 8 – YO 22 Ql Cbo 20 28 C– bo 21 20 42 Qfg 48 Qp Zm AN 36 Qbh Ql 6 29 Zi 69 Zm C– Zc Qbh Ql 30 C Zm Q Tsma Zm 36 53 37 Ql 53 Zcl 17 C– g 42 Zpu 46 C– e Zcu Qls Zpu 35 12 40 Ql Zpu Ql 22 C– n C– e Qal Ql 30 30 Ql C– g C– e Zc 52 Ts Ql Zcl Zps Zi 32 48 26 Ql 62 Ql C– Zc Zpa 43 42 75 42 Qfg Zcu Zm C– Zc 74 34 25 30 15 Zpa Ql C– bo Zm C– e 10 Ts C– g Qtg 26 Zcl C– Zc 39 Zi 37 15 OC– s Qtg Qs Ql Ts Qfg Zc 38 Zpa 40 47 71 10 Zcl 38 BEAR OC– s Tb 36 25 25 C– n Qsu Qal Zps 43 C– Zc C– g 47 40 Zcu Qm 39 47 Zcu C– g C– bo 8 30 52 Ql 32 32 36 C– e Qal Qal Zc C– g Qal 37 20 52 C– n Zm C– e 35 Q Tb Zpu Zb Ql 60 67 5 18 Tslb Ql 31 C– Zc Zpb Zcl Qfg 21 75 C– e Ql 31 Qls Qp 30 OC– s Qtg 31 Ql 23 11 38 – Qp 11 Ce Zcu 22 Qs Qfg 51 Zm 29 17 Qsu Qfg Qfg 17 Qm Qp Of Ql 31 Qfg Zcl 12 C– n OC– s 42 Qfg Qfg 68 Zi Qc Sl Tslb Ql Zm Os Os Tsma Zi Qls Qfg Of 19 Qtg 23 Zcl Of 4 40 47 33 39 Ts Tsur 46 Tsuc Ql Qfg – Qp 27 Tslb Qal Zc 28 19 Ce Zi 17 Q Qs 15 Tslr 22 Qal C– e Zcu 8 40 Zi Zm 65 Ts Zm C– Zc 35 Ql Ql 41 Sl 12 10 Qtg 50 33 56 41 Qm Qal Tb Zi 23 Zcu Qc Ql 27 Zi Qsu 41 59 C– e C– bo Zm Zm Q Of Tslb Zc 48 56 31 Ql C– e 6 Tslr 28 35 Qal 6 1 Qtg Tw C– Zc Qls Zpu 25 45 36 45 Zi C– g Ql Ql 60 C– bo 15 Ts 33 Tsma Ql 33 10 45 Qc Of Qam 38 42 Tsul Zpa Tsur Ts Twn Tn Ql Qfg Zm 26 41 35 34 OC– s Qal Qfg C– Zc 48 35 C– sw C– Zc Zps Zcl 12 Of 11 C– g Qal 6 14 Qsu 41 – C– bo 49 60 Os Cg C– e Ql 29 24 Ql Tw Tslb Tsur C– gc 28 45 Zm C– bo Zm Qc Q Zi Zm Qls 45 Og Qs Qr 54 – – 36 Qls Zi Tsur Qal 18 Ts Ml Ml 47 Cg 53 Ce 31 Q Qtg Ql 45 29 35 22 17 25 C– g Tsuc Zi Zpa 36 34 Q Tslb C– Zc Zi 42 Zi Ql Of Tsur C– g 20 Tn Dh C– Zc 49 Zcl 32 30 Qbh 56 17 Zm 24 C– Zc Os 31 Of Og Qam Qtg Qfg 36 35 Zb 39 45 55 Os Ql Tsup 49 Qls Zcl 33 Zcu Of C– Zc C– e Q 40 C– gc C– e 33 36 C– e Zpa Zc 5 Tn Tn Sl 35 30 Zpu Zc OC– s Qal Qal 41 Tsuc 55 35 15 8 Qr C– n Qal 38 Zi Ql Tsmt C– Zc Tsuc Ts Zm 32 24 Os Tslb Qal Tsma Ql 35 40 Qc C– g 23 Tsmt Ql C– Zc 32 Zm Tb Tw C– bo Zm Qal Zpa C– Zc Qp 36 23 C– bo Tmv Tw Mdu Tslb 30 C– g Zi Tmv 50 38 22 Ql – Qsu Qfg C– e Qc 40 CZc – 18 Qls Tslb C– bo QTr Qc 50 25 Zpa 26 Cn Tsur Qc 45 5 – C– e Zi 30 45 42 32 Qal Ql Tslb Cn 40 72 C– e C– e 31 Qfg – C– Zc C– g Zm 36 C– g Os Qtn Cn Qal Zm Qc C– e 18 Tb 35 25 Zm C– g Tsur 30 – 40 Q 8 60 Tsma 18 Ql C– sw Ce QTfg 25 Q Qal Ql – Tsur 25 – Zc Qc Csw Cbo Ts 30 C– n Og 60 Ts C– n C– sw Ql 30 Zi 22 Qal 20 Q C– bo Ts Of Tslb C– n 40 C– sw C– n 24 32 Zc Ql Ts Q Tslb Ql C– sw 25 Zc 35 – OC– su C– Zc Qtg Tw Tslb Os C– n Ce C– Zc OC– s Qr Qtn 40 C– bo 15 C– e Zc – Mgl Ql Og Os 20 C– g 25 45 Ce Qs Tl Tw Of Ql C– n OC– su Qc 50 C– n C– bo 52 Os Tsma Ts 35 40 40 C– g – 32 C– e Tmv Qfg Og Os Qc Ce Qc Qc QTfg 9 Of Zm 26 C– e 40 Tmv Tn Ql C– sw 55 36 C– n C– e 32 35 Tsma C– bo Zi 85 Os Og 20 15 C– g C– e 26 Qc C– g Qs Tl Qsu Tsma 35 Og OC– su Ql 60 Qls Of Os Os C– e 45 Zm 50 28 Ts C– n Qr Tmv Mgl 10 34 24 Os Os Os 22 Qfg Qfg C– bo C– sw OC– s Q Og Qcb Qr Tsma Tslb C– sw Tsuc C– bo – Ts Qcb Tslb Og C– sw Og Qfg 40 Ql Tsuf 35 Ql 25 C– n C– bo 35 C– Zc 40 29 Cn 50 C– n 25 58 60 Qm Og Og Qc 10 25 Ql Tw Ql Og 40 OC– su C– Zc 45 Og Tmv Tmv Tmv PIPo Of Os Os Qc 26 29 Tl Ql IPoc – Os Of Qc Os 20 – Qr 27 Cn Tsuc Zb 45 Cn Qls 52 38 Of Qal – Os Qs Ts Qal Os OC– su 30 Csw 15 Zpa 20 Qal Tslr Og Os C– sw 15 Qc QTfg Qm 8 Zps 23 Os 9 60 Ql 15 Tl Tsur C– n 42 Qc Tsuc Qc Zpu Qc Og IPob Tslb Tsma Ql 25 C– n Tmv Qc Og Zc 34 Sl Q Os Ts Mdl 15 Ql C– bo 28 C– e 18 Tw Tslb Mdu Ql 45 40 Qc 33 OC– su Qal 40 Ql C– e 16 18 6 Mdl Db 30 Tl Tslb Mgl 56 C– n C– n Tmv IPoc Tslb Ql Tsma 26 15 Tmv 18 IPob 10 Zps 55 IPoc Mdu Ml Db Qc Ts 14 Qal Db Ml Qfg Qc 35 64 Ql Qfg 9 16 Ql Mdu Ts 52 15 Tmv IPob Ql Qc 32 Tsma Tsuc Zi C– bo 28 14 Dh Ts 9 Mdl Qc Tmv IPob Of Ml 35 OC– s 27 14 24 Mgl Tsur Qc Zm Tl 40 Ml 65 20 Q Tmv Tsur 18 Sl Ql 25 8 Og Qcb 17 PIPo 17 Mgl Ml Tsuf 41 37 25 Mdu 30 Zps 30 55 10 Zi Tmv Sl Mdu Zpu 5 50 Qal Tmv Tmv 22 Of 45 Of Sl Tmv Sl 40 Ts Tw IPoc 15 Os Q Qal Dh Of Zps Zi 70 Ts 35 IPob IPoc 15 Qfg 20 38 38 27 18 25 40 Qfg 2Ml0 Qal Of 21 Tsma 45 31 Mgl 35 Qc 50 32 25 IPob Qc Tmv Qal 30 45 Sl Os Og Zc 13 Of Db Mdl Qfg 34 Qfg Sl Ql Tsuc Zb PIPo 37 Db Ml Ql Qal Tw Tmv Qfg Qal Ml Qfg Zpa 30 Ts Tmv 22 Ts Qc QTfg Ts Dh 40 – Qp Ql PIPod Dh Mdl Ce IPoa 31 Mdl Mgl Mdu 30 Of Zm Qfg 35 Db Ts 45 45 Ts Of Ql Tsur Qfg 25 31 Mgu IPob Mdu Ml 10 Of IPMm 8 Mdl Of 24 PIPo Sl 7 Db Ql Zpa Sl IPob 7 Dh Mdu 25 Sl Tsuc 29 IPoc Dh Mdl Qc Os Zc Qp Qfg Of Mdu Mdl Tsuc 20 Qp IPoa 45 Mdl Db Sl Db Ql QTfg Os Tmv 26 IPMm Ml Tslr IPob Db Dh Os Os Ml 35 Qm Qal Tsur Mdu Sl Db Of 12 Of Ql Of Sl Zp Zi Tmv Dh Tsma Og 24 50 Of Qal Qc Tsur 40 5 Mdu Dh Ml Qp Mgl IPoc 22 Db 16 35 Ql Qp 5 Of Tmv 21 PIPo Of Sl 8 4 50 C– sw 32 Ts IPob 30 Dh Mgl Mdu Dh Zc Zc Os 35 Mgm Mgu Ml Qfg Of 30 Os 40 17 Ml Ts Qc 16 22 Db Db Mdl Sl OC– su Os Sl Ql Of Mgu IPoa PIPod Of Sl Ml Of Qc Of Qfg Tmv 43 30 Mdl Ql Og Os Qfg 55 Db Zp Ql Os Dh Ml Sl Qc Sl Mdu 30 Zp 40 Mdl Os IPMm 26 Db Of Os Og 30 Of PIPod Mdu Dh Os Tsur C– e 25 Qal Tmv Mdl 14 IPoc Sl Of Tsug Tsur Ql IPMm 17 25 IPoa 14 20 Tsul 30 15 Tsuc Qtn IPob 8 50 45 Tsur Db 32 C– sw Sl Tmv 18 18 Of Os Tsur 15 Ql PIPod IPoc 63 45 13 30 Os Qc Tsur IPoa Sl 25 – 40 Of Ql Ql PIPod 3 37 30 Ts Cbo IPoa 45 45 28 23 14 IPob IPoc 23 Tmv 10 Qtn IPoc 11 Ql Og Zps IPob Ql 28 35 PIPo Tsur 15 OC– su 15 12 45 15 Tsug Qfg Tsur Qc Qc Tsur Tsuc Sl Tmv Ts Qal 10 Ts 30 Tsuc Tsur PIPod Qal 20 Tsma Ql C– g 8 3 30 40 Ts 24 8 40 C– e 30 Qc 10 Os Ts Ql – Of PIPod PIPod Ql Og Sl Tsuc 35 Csw 15 Ql Ts 35 5 Ts Ql Os Qal Os Os Tsuf C– bo C– e 25 Os Tsug Ql 25 Tsma OC– su 50 5 Ts 14 Ql 20 PIPo 28 C– bo 16 30 57 QTfg Of Qal 31 21 Ql C– n 28 22 C– n 35Qc Tsur Ts IPob 33 Qc 45 Og Ql Of Sl Og Ql Qfg IPob 30 Tsur PIPod 34 IPob Of 40 C– bo20 Tmv 30 10 28 C– sw Os Os 35 Qfg Qfg Os Sl Tsuc 30 Qtn Dwc IPoc Ql Tsur Qc 40 23 24 IPoa 45 45 Of IPoc 10 Qc Tsug C– sw Ql Tsma Qc Mgb Dh 25 Qal Os C– n 28 24 23 IPMm Of Ts Ts 38 PIPod 30 Os 5 Tsul 35 Qtn 30 Os Ql 33 PIPod Db Og Qc 10 Os PIPo PIPo 18 15 25 20 C– bo 8 Ql Og Qal Og Tsub 20 Ql 20 Qc Ts Tsub C– e 21 20 Qfg IPob 25 23 15 25 Zpu Tsur 79 Tslr Ts IPoa Ql 20 22 Db Mh 15 Ql Os 35 Ql IPoa 8 15 Og Ts 14 12 8 Ql Qfg 50 Tsur Ql 20 IPob PIPo Dwc Zb Tsur C– g 42 32 Ql IPMm 25 60 38 Ts 27 Ml IPoa 35 Sl Qc Os Tsur Ts Tslr Qfg IPoa 23 10 10 Of Ql Tslr IPoc Ts Sl Zp Ts 32 PIPod 12 15 15 Tsur Tsma 20 15 35 Sl 64 Ql Of Qc PIPod Qal Ql Ts Ts Og Ql Qfg Qc 10 Qm Tsma IPoc Ql Qfg 35 Qfg Ts Mh Qc 21 Qfg Qc Qal PIPo IPob 20 6 Tsuc 20 Tslb Tsma 22 30 Qc Of Qc Qal 45 30 Qc PIPo 15 Qfg 25 Ql 15 Qc Tsur Tslr Tslr Ql IPob Tsur Tsub Qal IPob IPoa 20 IPoa Ql PIPo IPoc Mgb IPMm Ts Qc Tsug 16 PIPod 14 30 PIPo Mgl 40 Ql Tsub Os Of Sl Tsub Of Ts Tslr IPMm PIPo 25 Dh 20 Ts Base map from USGS, 1:100,000 digital raster graphic.
Recommended publications
  • Brigham Young University Geology Studies Is Published Semiannually by the Department
    A publication of the Department of Geology Brigharn Young University Provo, Utah 84602 Editors W. Kenneth Hamblin Cynthia M. Gardner Brigham Young University Geology Studies is published semiannually by the department. Geology Studies consists of graduate-student and staff research in the department and occasional papers from other contributors. Studies for Students supplements the regular issues and is intended as a series of short papers of general interest which may serve as guides to the geology of Utah for beginning students and laymen. ISSN 0068-1016 Distributed August 1977 Price $5.00 (Subject to change without notice) 8-77 600 21403 Geology Studies Volume 24, Part 1 CONTENTS Lower Mesozoic and Upper Paleozoic Petroleum Potential of the Hingeline Area, Central Utah ................................................................................ Floyd C. Moulton Structure and Stratigraphy of the Co-op Creek Quadrangle, Wasatch County, Utah ................................. ..................................................................... Gary K. Astin The Petrology of Three Upper Permian Bioherms, Southern Tunisia .... Allan F. Driggs The Geomorphic Evolution of the Crater Hill Volcanic Field of Zion National Park ........................................................................................ R. LaRell Nielson Biogeochemical Exploration for Cu, Pb, and Zn Mineral Deposits, Using Juniper and Sage, Dugway Range, Utah .................................................... LaRon Taylor Late Cenozoic Volcanic and Tectonic
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Geology of Eastern Part of James Peak Quadrangle and Western Part of Sharp Mountain Quadrangle, Utah
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-1979 Structural Geology of Eastern Part of James Peak Quadrangle and Western Part of Sharp Mountain Quadrangle, Utah Steven L. Rauzi Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Rauzi, Steven L., "Structural Geology of Eastern Part of James Peak Quadrangle and Western Part of Sharp Mountain Quadrangle, Utah" (1979). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 3538. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/3538 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY OF EASTERN PART OF JAMES PEAK QUADRANGLE AND WESTERN PART OF SHARP MOUNTAIN QUADRANGLE, UTAH by Steven L. Rauzi A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Geology UTAH STATE ill~IVERSITY Logan, Utah 1979 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am sincerely thankful to Dr. Clyde T. Hardy, under whose direction this work was done, for suggesting the study and providing valuable suggestions and criticism both in the field and on the manuscript. Gratitude is also expressed to both Drs. Richard R. Alexander and Peter T. Kolesar, members of my committee, f or reviewing the manuscript. Dr. Alexander also aided in the identification of some of the fossils collected by the writer. Suggestions from Dr. Robert Q. Oaks, Jr., are also appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy of the Wasatch Range Near Salt Lake City, Utah
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 296 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE WASATCH RANGE NEAR SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH .. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director · GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 296 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE WASATCH RANGE NEAR SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH By Arthur E. Granger Washington, D. C., 1953 Free on application to the Geological Survey, Washington 25, D. C. 113° 112° 111° I D 0 42° 42° C!:) z c H • X E L I c H :g 0 B E R. \ Ogden ...._// l_ ---........ ...... _// ) 0 R G A N _ _,)__~ _f H SUMMIT I J AREA OF REPORT L A K E ').....-= I /~ / I T 0 0 E L E ..r' I I w A \ --~ \ ...___, • \ \ \ I 5 0 20 Miles I H ,, Index map of north-central Utah showing area of report. iv STRATIGRAPHY OF THE WASATCH RANGE NEAR SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH By Arthur E. Granger CONTENTS Page Page Introduction.. 1 Permian system-Continued Pre-Cambrian rocks.......................... 2 Park City formation . 3 Lower pre-Cambrian rocks. 2 Triassic system,. 3 Upper pre-Cambrian rocks............... 2 Woodside shale........................... 3 Cambrian system. 2 Thaynes formation . 4 Brigham quartzite...................... 2 Ankareh shale. 4 Ophir shale. 2 Jurassic system, . 4 Maxfield limestone . • . 2 Nugget sandstone......................... 4 Ordovician system. 2 Twin Creek limestone. 4_ Swan Peak(?) formation... • . 2 Preuss sandstone . 4 Devonian system . 2 Morrison(?) formation.................... 4 Pinyon Peak limestone.................. 2 Cretaceous system. 4 Carboniferous system......................... 2 Kelvin formation .................._....... 4 Mississippian series.................... 2 Frontier formation. 4 Madison limestone. 3 Conglomerate~ ... -. 5 Deseret limestone . 3 Tertiary system .
    [Show full text]
  • EIS-0386-DEIS-02-2007.Pdf
    Draft WWEC PEIS September 2007 DOCUMENT CONTENTS VOLUME I Executive Summary Chapter 1: Why Are Federal Agencies Proposing to Designate Energy Corridors in the West? Chapter 2: What Are the Alternatives Evaluated in This PEIS? Chapter 3: What Are the Potential Environmental Consequences of Corridor Designation and Land Use Plan Amendment? Chapter 4: How Are Cumulative Impacts Evaluated? Chapter 5: What Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Might Be Caused by Corridor Designation and Land Use Plan Amendment? Chapter 6: The Relationship between Local Short-Term Uses of the Environment and Long-Term Productivity Chapter 7: What Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources Would Be Involved with Implementation of the Alternatives? Chapter 8: List of Preparers Chapter 9: References Chapter 10: Glossary VOLUME II Appendix A: Proposed Land Use Plan Amendments Appendix B: Summary of Public Scoping Comments for the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, Designation of Energy Corridors on Federal Land in the 11 Western States (DOE/FS-0386) Appendix C: Tribal Consultation Appendix D: Federal and State Regulatory Requirements Potentially Applicable When Designating Energy Corridors Appendix E: Energy Transport Technologies and Hypothetical Energy Transport Projects Appendix F: Section 368 Corridor Parameters Appendix G: Sensitive Resource Areas That Would Be Intersected by Proposed West-wide Energy Corridors Appendix H: Geographic Information System Data Appendix I: Summary of WWEC PEIS Webcasts for Corridor Review and Revision, 6/19/06 to 4/24/07
    [Show full text]
  • Type Locality for the Great Blue Limestone in the Bingham Nappe, Oquirrh Mountains, Utah
    Type Locality for the Great Blue Limestone in the Bingham Nappe, Oquirrh Mountains, Utah by Mackenzie Gordon, Jr1 , Edwin W. Tooker2 and J. Thomas Dutro, Jr.3 Open-File Report OF 00-012 2000 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Deceased, 2Menlo Park, CA, and 3Washington, D.C. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract. ............................................ 4 Introduction ......................................... 5 Regional Geologic Setting of the Bingham Nappe .......... 8 The Type Section of the Great Blue Limestone. ............ 9 Location ....................................... 9 General Lithologic Characteristics of the Great Blue Limestone ..................................... 10 Silveropolis Limestone Member of Tooker and Gordon, (1978). ....................... 11 Long Trail Shale Member. ................... .11 Mercur Limestone Member of Tooker and Gordon (1978). ........................ 12 Fossils and Age of the Great Blue Limestone. ........ 14 Regional Lithologic and Faunal Correlations of the Great Blue Limestone .......................................... 16 East Tintic Mountains ............................. 17 Southern Oquirrh Mountains Fivemile Pass Nappe ... 18 Northern Oquirrh Mountains Rogers Canyon Nappe . .18 Wasatch
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Canyon Near Provo, Utah County
    Figure 2. Looking down Rock Canyon to the west toward Utah Lake. The prominent folded rocks shown here are Mississippian Humbug Formation, Deseret Limestone,Rock and Canyon Gardison Formation. near Photo is courtesyProvo, of Beau Walker.Utah County: A Geologic Field Laboratory Bart J. Kowallis and Laura C. Wald Department of Geological Sciences, Brigham Young University Provo, Utah 84604 [email protected] Utah Geosites 2019 Utah Geological Association Publication 48 M. Milligan, R.F. Biek, P. Inkenbrandt, and P. Nielsen, editors Figure 3. Headline and part of the article from the Provo Daily Her- ald, 29 July 1936, p. 1, reporting on the flood out of Rock Canyon Figure 4. Flood waters flowing out of Rock Canyon along Temple the previous day. Rain had begun in the mountains in the early af- View Drive in Provo in early June 1983. Photo by Bart Kowallis. ternoon. Lewis Richards, who was at his homesteadCover Image: inLooking the canyon down Rock Canyon to the west toward Utah Lake. heard the roaring of the flood at about 2 p.m. and reported that, “It looked like the whole mountain had begun to move.” Flooding also occurred from similar storms in other central Utah communities the same day. 2 M. Milligan, R.F. Biek, P. Inkenbrandt, and P. Nielsen, editors 2019 Utah Geological Association Publication 48 Presidents Message I have had the pleasure of working with many diff erent geologists from all around the world. As I have traveled around Utah for work and pleasure, many times I have observed vehicles parked alongside the road with many people climbing around an outcrop or walking up a trail in a canyon.
    [Show full text]
  • Type Locality for the Great Blue Limestone in the Bingham Nappe, Oquirrh Mountains, Utah
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) Depository) 2000 Type Locality for the Great Blue Limestone in the Bingham Nappe, Oquirrh Mountains, Utah United States Geological Survey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/govdocs Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation United States Geological Survey, "Type Locality for the Great Blue Limestone in the Bingham Nappe, Oquirrh Mountains, Utah" (2000). All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository). Paper 57. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/govdocs/57 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2 T OLE OF O. 'TENT Pag e l1USGS . ~ Abstrn.ct. , " ... , .....................• , ....•..... ,. 4 sClonco fa.,. 3 ch3ngmq world Introducti on .... , ...... .. .... , .... , . .. 5 Regional Geologic Selling of the Bingham Nappe , . , ... , . ,. 8 The Type Section of the Great Bluc Limestone ... , .. , .. , . '. 9 Local ion .................. , , . .. ,. ......... , 9 Type Locality for the General Lithologic Charncteristics of the Great Bluc Ltmestone. , , ..... .. ...... ' ........ , , .. , .. , , 10 Great Blue Limestone Silveropolis Limestone Member of Tooker and Gordon. ( 1978)....... , ................ II in the Bingham Nappe, Long Trail Shale Member. ...... , ........ .... 11 Mcrcur Limestnne Member of Tooker and Gordon (1978)................ ... , . 12 Oquirrh Mountains, Fossils and Age of the Great Blue Limes.one, . , ...... 14 Regional Lithologic anli Faunal Correlations of the Great Bluc Utall Limestone ... .... .. , . , .... , ...... , ... , , ....... , . 16 East Tintic Mountains ........ , .. , ...... , . , ... , . , . 17 Southern Oquirrh Mountains-Fivemile Pass appe ..
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map Compilation of the Malad City 30 X 60 Minute Quadrangle, Idaho Sean P
    IDAHO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TECHNICAL REPORT 07-1 MOSCOW-BOISE-POCATELLO LONG AND LINK Project supported in 2006 by NSF EAR #0331174, to Paul Link. Map compiled by spl (6/06) redrafted and edited by pkl (9/06) This Technical Report is a reproduction of independent compilation by Sean P. Long and Paul K. Link of Idaho State University, Pocatello, This map has not been externally edited. The authors made Idaho. Its content and format may not conform to agency standards. minimal changes to map units and fault locations. Please address any comments to Paul Link [email protected] Geologic Map Compilation of the Malad City 30 x 60 Minute Quadrangle, Idaho Sean P. Long and Paul K. Link 2007 Salt Lake Formation, tuff (Pliocene? to Upper Miocene) Includes several Oquirrh Group unit b (Late to Early? Pennsylvanian) Interbedded sandy Brigham Group, undifferentiated (Lower Cambrian to Neoproterozoic) Shown Kellogg, K.S., Harlan, S.S., Mehnert, H.H., Snee, L.W., Pierce, K.L., Hackett, W.R., Description of Map Units Tt tuff units mapped in Sublett and Deep Creek mountains; includes white to gray, PobI to silty limestone and calcareous sandstone to siltstone, with rare bioclastic CZb only in northeast corner of map area, includes strata of the Camelback Mountain adn Rodgers, D.W., 1994, Major 10.2 Ma rhyolitic volcanism in the eastern vitric air-fall tuff and water-lain tuff, pink to gray vitric ash-flow tuff, pink to limestone; lithology identical to unit c, 1600-2750 ft (490-840 m) thick. Quartzite, Mutual Formation, Inkom Formation, Caddy Canyon Quartzite, and Papoose Snake rvier Plain, Idaho--Isotopic age and stratigrpahic setting of the Arbon Map units were generally taken from previous geologic maps; some units were gray, rhyolitic welded tuffs, and a 10.4-10.8 Ma (K-Ar age) (Armstrong et al, Creek Formation, with combined thickness of 4300 ft (1310 m).
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Northern Stansbury Range, Tooele County, Utah
    GEOLOGGEOLOGYY OOFF THTHEE NORTHERNORTHERNN STANSBURSTANSBURYY RANGERANGE,, TOOELTOOELEE COUNTYCOUIif.PY,, UTAUTAHH bbyy DwighDwightt EllswortEllsworthh ArnoldArnold A, thesisthesis submittedsubmitted toto thethe facultyfaculty ooff thethe UniversityUniversity ofof UtahUtah inin partialpartial fulfillmentfulfillment ofof thethe requirementsrequirements forfor thethe degreedegree ofof l-1asterMaster ofof ScienceScience DepartmentDepartment ofof GeologyGeology LIBRARLIBRARYY UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OFOF UTAHUTAH UniversityUniversity ofof UtahUtah JJune, 1956 37%.ZiZ ^e5 1956 This Thes is for the E .. So d eg::cee by DHight Eo Arnold has been approved by � --dr�Chairman, SUP0 visor pommittee upervisory Committee , Supervisory Committee--- �� Head� Major Department 368566 TABLTABLEE OOFF CONTENTCON TENTSS Page INTRODUCTIOINTRODUCTIONN •. o 0 0 • • 0 ~ • 0 • • 0 • G 0 o 0 () 0 soo 1 LocatioLocationn .• »0 .• .• • • 0 0 • c • • 1 G © e O * & • 0 PreviouPr eviouss WorWorkk anandd ExplorationExploration co•• o 0 • c • • 1 PurposPurposee o0 ©0 o0 o0 o•• o o• o0 •••• • * • • • 0 2 Field.d WorWorkk c0 »0 «0 .9 •G •(J «0 .• .0 " • " • G • 0 • 0 2 AcknowledgementAcknowledgementss • 0 0 • • o 0 o 0 O O STRATIGRAPHSTRATIGRAPHYY ......• OOOO . O O U .o .0 •. o • • · . 5 CambriaCambriann SystemoSystem, 0 o 0 • 0 o • .. O O 0 O 0 • • • 5 Opex Formation 0 •0 0 • 0 0 0 • 0 o .. 6 Opex Formation 0 o o o o • o UnnameUnnamedd CambriaCambriann (?(?)) FormationFormation .. .. 0 o 0 9 OrdoviciaOrdoviciann SystemoSystem 0 0 .00 11 " 0 • • • • 0 . " Garden City Limestone 0 • 0 • • • • Garden City Limestone Oo O O o a « 12 SwanSwan PeaPeakk (?(?)) FormationoFormation o ...o o 0o o0 6 " 15 FisFishh HaveHavenn DolomiteDolomite O0 •O O0 o0 0o •o e• 0 • o. 18 DevoniaDevoniann System.System, " • . • . • 0 o 0 • • ~ e 20 0 0 • ~ 0 0 0.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PALEOECOLOGY of MISSISSIPPIAN CORALS in the WESTERN CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES Aside from Scattered, Mostly Generalized Stat
    ACT A PAL A E 0 N T 0 LOG I CAP 0 LON ICA ----- Vol. 25 1980 No. 3-3 WILLIAM J. SANDO THE PALEOECOLOGY OF MISSISSIPPIAN CORALS IN THE WESTERN CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES SANDO, W. J.: The paleoecology of Mississippian corals in the western conter­ minous United States. Acta Palaeont. Polonica, 25, 314, 619-631, January 1981. In the Mississippian (Early Carboniferous) of the Rocky Mountain and Great Basin regions of the United States, colonial Rugosa occur exclusively in shallow­ -water lithofacies. Tabulates occur in both deep- and shallow-water lithofacies. Among the solitary Rugosa, which occur in both deep- and shallow-water litho­ facies, deep-water forms are predominantly nondissepimented. Most taxa that occur in both deep- and shallow-water lithofacies first appeared in deep water, then migrated to shallow water later in geologic time. Corals lived predominantly in deep water during Kinderhookian (early and middle Tour­ naisian) time, despite the existence of large areas of shallow-water deposition. A marked shift in coral occurrence to predominantly shallow-water environ­ ments took place·'i11 latest Kinder+tooldan (middle Tournaisian) time, and this trend toward shallow-water continued to the end of the Mississippian (early Na­ murian). Key w 0 r d s: paleoecology, corals, Lower Carboniferous, North America. WilHam J. Sando, U.S. Geological Survey, E-501 U.S. National Museum Wa­ shington, D. C. 20244 USA, Received: September 1979. INTRODUCTION Aside from scattered, mostly generalized statements, little information has been published on the paleoecology of Early Carboniferous corals (Hill 1938; Hubbard 1966; Sando 1960, 1969; Kachanov 1970; Vassiljuk 1974; Altmark 1975; Armstrong 1975).
    [Show full text]
  • 1994 Fall Gregson Joe.Pdf (5.363Mb)
    THESIS NORTH-NORTHWEST SHORTENING ACROSS LARAMIDE STRUCTURES IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UINTA MOUNTAINS, COLORADO AND UTAH Submitted by Joe Denny Gregson Department of Earth Resources In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Fall, 1994 COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY September 28, 1994 WE HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER OUR SUPERVISION BY JOE D. GREGSON ENTITLED NORTH-NORTHWEST SHORTENING ACROSS LARAMIDE STRUCTURES IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UINTA MOUNTAINS, COLORADO AND UTAH BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING IN PART REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE. Committee on Graduate Work ii ABSTRACT OF THESIS NORTH-NORTHWEST SHORTENING ACROSS LARAMIDE STRUCTURES IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UINTA MOUNTAINS, COLORADO AND UTAH The Rocky Mountain foreland consists of a series of anastomosing structural arches that vary greatly in trend. Several previous studies of Laramide faulting document predominantly northeast-southwest shortening that is independent of arch orientation. Laramide faults and folds in the southeastern Uinta arch, however, suggest a north­ northwest shortening direction. Laramide structures in the Dinosaur National Monument area were examined to investigate the possibility of north­ northwest shortening. Eigenvector, M-plane, conjugate fracture, octahedra, and direct stress inversion analyses of 1206 slickensided minor faults give slip and a 1 trends averaging N22°W. Although the slip and a 1 trends are nearly perpendicular to individual structural trends, suggesting local control of stress and strain fields by the structures, a consistent component of northwesterly slip indicates north-northwest compression. To test this unusual Laramide a 1 direction, a 3-D restoration of the compressional Yampa graben area was iii constructed.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Southern Lakeside Mountains, Utah
    GEOLOGY OF THE SOUTHERN LAKESIDE MOUNTAINS, UTAH by John C. Young A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of Utah in parti3.1 fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Scie nce Department of Geology University of Utah August 1953 Approved: Chairman, Supervisory Committee / LIBHARY UNIVERSITY O� :ur� TABLE OF CONTENTS PPagea g e ,I INTRODUCTIOINTRODUCTIONN ••••• • • . •.. • • • • • • • • • 11 FIELFIELDD WORWORKK ANANDD ACKNOWLEDGEMENTACKNOWLEDGEMENTSS • • • • • • • • • • 3 STRATIGRAPHSTRATIGRAPHYY • • • • • • • • • • • • •••. •• .• 4 IntroductioIntroduction.n • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• 4:4 CambriaCambriann SysteSystemm ...........• • • • • • • • • • •. • • • • • • • • 5 TintiTinticc QuartzitQuartzitee • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• 6 OphiOphirr ShalShale;e • • • • • • • • • • · • .. • • • • 6 HartmanHartmannn (?(?)) LimestonLime stonee • • • • • .• .• .• .• . • 7 BowmaBowmann (?{?}) LimestonLimestonee • • • • • • • •••· • • • • • 8 LyncLynchh (?(?)) DolomitDolomitee •.. • . • •••••• · • · • • • • • • • • 8 Ordovician System • • • • • • · . .. • • 11 Garden City Limestone · . .. • • • • • • • • 12 Swan Peak Formation. • • • • • • • • • • • 12 Fish Haven Dolomite • • • • • • • • • • • 13 Silurian Systen'1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 14 , . Laketown Dolomite • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 14 Devonian Systeul • • • • • • • • • 15 • • • • • • • • • •• • Water Canyon Formation • • • • • • • • • 15 Jefferson Dolomite •••••••••• • • • • 16 :Mlssissippian System • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • •
    [Show full text]