Terminal Evaluation Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Terminal Evaluation Report 2014 September Version: Final CBPF: Strengthening Globally Important Biodiversity Conservation through Protected Area Strengthening in Gansu Province GEF Project ID: 3864 UNDP PIMS ID: 4072 Region: Asia and the Pacific Focal Area: Biodiversity Funding Source: GEF Trust Fund Implementing Agency: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Executing Agency: Gansu Provincial Government (Gansu Forestry Department) Project Timeframe: January 2011 to January 2015 Photos by Li He and J. Lenoci, Sep 2014 Prepared by: Professor Li He, National Consultant James Lenoci, International Consultant / Team Leader Terminal Evaluation Report, 2014 September CBPF: Strengthening Globally Important Biodiversity Conservation Through Protected Area Strengthening in Gansu Province, China GEF Project ID: 3864; UNDP PIMS ID: 4072 Terminal Evaluation Opening Page: Project Name: CBPF: Strengthening Globally Important Biodiversity Conservation Through Protected Area Strengthening in Gansu Province GEF Project ID: 3864 UNDP PIMS ID: 4072 Country: China Region: Asia and the Pacific Funding Source: GEF Trust Fund Focal Area: Biodiversity PIF Approval: 02 April 2009 Approval Date: 12 November 2009 CEO Endorsement Date: 22 June 2010 Implementing Agency: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Management Arrangement: National Implementation Modality (NIM) Implementing Partner: Gansu Provincial Government (Gansu Forestry Department) Implementation Timeframe: January 2011 to January 2015 Project Cost, at endorsement: USD 9,348,000 (includes PPG costs) GEF Grant, at endorsement: USD 1,818,000 (includes USD 80,000 PPG grant) Co-Financing, Committed: USD 7,530,000 (includes USD 250,000 for PPG phase) Cash: USD 1,500,000 (for implementation phase) In-Kind: USD 5,780,000 + USD 250,000 for preparation phase Terminal Evaluation Timeframe: September-October 2014 Evaluation Team: Prof. Li He, National Consultant James Lenoci, International Consultant / Team Leader Language of Evaluation Report: English The evaluation team would like acknowledge the information and feedback provided by interviewed project stakeholders, including GFD staff, officials from other Gansu provincial agencies, staff at the four demonstration PA’s (Gahaizecha NR, Taohe NR, Lianhuashan NR, and Taizishan NR), local community representatives, and villagers. Special thanks are also extended to the CBPF program officer, UNDP Country Office Staff, the GEF Regional Technical Advisor, location consultants, the international business planning consultant. Finally, the evaluation team is grateful for the insight shared by the project manager, the support extended by the entire PMO and PMU teams, and the qualified assistance by the interpreter/translator. Gansu PIMS 4072 TE report 2014 Sep final Terminal Evaluation Report, 2014 September CBPF: Strengthening Globally Important Biodiversity Conservation Through Protected Area Strengthening in Gansu Province, China GEF Project ID: 3864; UNDP PIMS ID: 4072 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................i Abbreviations and Acronyms ........................................................................................................... vii 1. Introduction ...............................................................................................................................1 1.1. Purpose of Evaluation .................................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Evaluation Scope and Methodology ............................................................................................ 1 1.3. Structure of the Evaluation Report .............................................................................................. 1 1.4. Ethics ............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.5. Response to Review Comments ................................................................................................... 3 1.6. Limitations .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.7. Evaluation Ratings ........................................................................................................................ 4 2. Project Description ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.1. Project Start and Duration ........................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Problems that the Project Sought to Address ............................................................................. 5 2.3. Immediate and Development Objectives of the Project............................................................. 7 2.4. Baseline Indicators Established .................................................................................................... 7 2.5. Main Stakeholders ........................................................................................................................ 7 2.6. Expected Results ........................................................................................................................... 9 3. Findings .....................................................................................................................................9 3.1. Project Design / Formulation ....................................................................................................... 9 3.1.1. Analysis of Logical Results Framework .......................................................................................... 9 3.1.2. Assumptions and Risks ................................................................................................................ 12 3.1.3. Lessons from other Relevant Projects......................................................................................... 13 3.1.4. Planned Stakeholder Participation .............................................................................................. 13 3.1.5. Replication Approach .................................................................................................................. 14 3.1.6. UNDP Comparative Advantage ................................................................................................... 15 3.1.7. Linkages between Project and other Interventions .................................................................... 15 3.1.8. Management Arrangements ....................................................................................................... 16 3.2. Project Implementation ............................................................................................................. 17 3.2.1. Adaptive Management ................................................................................................................ 17 3.2.2. Partnership Arrangements .......................................................................................................... 17 3.2.3. Feedback from M&E Activities used for Adaptive Management ................................................ 18 3.2.4. Project Finance ............................................................................................................................ 18 3.2.5. Monitoring & Evaluation ............................................................................................................. 21 3.2.6. Implementing Agency (IA) and Implementing Partner (Executing Agency-EA) Execution ......... 25 3.3. Project Results ............................................................................................................................ 26 3.3.1. Overall Results (Attainment of Objective) .................................................................................. 26 3.3.2. Capacity Building ......................................................................................................................... 34 3.3.3. Knowledge Management ............................................................................................................ 35 3.3.4. Relevance .................................................................................................................................... 36 3.3.5. Efficiency ..................................................................................................................................... 37 3.3.6. Country Ownership ..................................................................................................................... 38 3.3.7. Mainstreaming ............................................................................................................................ 38 3.3.8. Sustainability ............................................................................................................................... 39 3.3.9. Catalytic Role ............................................................................................................................... 42 3.3.10. Impact ......................................................................................................................................... 43 4. Conclusions, Recommendations, Lessons, Good Practices .......................................................... 46 4.1. Conclusions ................................................................................................................................