DOCSLIB.ORG

Management of Pinyon Pine Forests

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Management of Pinyon Pine Forests Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program PROJECT NUMBER 09-425 Habitat Use at Multiple Scales by Pinyon- Juniper Birds on Department of Defense Lands: Landscape Scale Kristine Johnson, Lynn Wickersham, Teri Neville, John Wickersham, Jacqueline Smith, Matthew Baumann, and Carol Finley Natural Heritage New Mexico Publication 11-GTR-360 5 January 2011 PUBLIC RELEASE STATEMENT (OPTIONAL) (arial 12 pt) Habitat Use at Multiple Scales by Pinyon-Juniper Birds on Department of Defense Lands: Landscape Scale Project Year 1 Kristine Johnson, Lynn Wickersham, Teri Neville, John Wickersham, Jacqueline Smith, Matthew Baumann, and Carol Finley Natural Heritage New Mexico Publication 11-GTR-360 5 January 2011 Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Abstract .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 6 Pinyon-Juniper Habitats and Wildlife ........................................................................................................ 6 Gray Vireo ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Pinyon Jay.................................................................................................................................................. 8 The Project ................................................................................................................................................. 8 Study Areas .................................................................................................................................................... 9 Camel Tracks Training Area (CTTA) ........................................................................................................ 9 Kirtland Air Force Base (KAFB) ..............................................................................................................10 White Sands Missile Range (WSMR) ......................................................................................................11 Methods .........................................................................................................................................................13 Gray Vireos...............................................................................................................................................13 KAFB and CTTA .................................................................................................................................13 Pinyon Jays ...............................................................................................................................................14 KAFB ...................................................................................................................................................14 WSMR .................................................................................................................................................15 KAFB and WSMR ...............................................................................................................................16 Habitat Modeling ......................................................................................................................................16 Results ...........................................................................................................................................................17 Map Units for Landscape-scale Models ...................................................................................................17 Vegetation Map Units ..........................................................................................................................17 Ponderosa Pine Woodland ...................................................................................................................17 Pinyon Pine Woodland ........................................................................................................................17 Pinyon-Juniper Woodland....................................................................................................................17 Juniper Woodland and Savanna ...........................................................................................................18 Juniper Woodland and Savanna on Volcanic Hills............................................................................18 Juniper Savanna on Lava Plains ........................................................................................................18 Shrubland .............................................................................................................................................18 Grassland .............................................................................................................................................18 Other ....................................................................................................................................................19 Gray Vireos CTTA ...................................................................................................................................19 Banding ................................................................................................................................................19 Territories.............................................................................................................................................19 GIS Habitat Model ...............................................................................................................................20 Distance to Military Infrastructure and Activities ................................................................................20 Gray Vireos KAFB ...................................................................................................................................20 Banding ................................................................................................................................................20 Territories.............................................................................................................................................21 GIS Habitat Model ...............................................................................................................................23 Distance to Military Infrastructure and Activities ................................................................................23 Pinyon Jays KAFB ...................................................................................................................................24 Banding/Transmitters ...........................................................................................................................24 Flock Size ............................................................................................................................................24 Home Ranges .......................................................................................................................................24 Breeding ............................................................................................................................................25 Nonbreeding ......................................................................................................................................25 Combined Breeding and Nonbreeding ..............................................................................................26 Caching Areas ......................................................................................................................................28 GIS Habitat Model ...............................................................................................................................28 Distance to Military Infrastructure and Activities ................................................................................29 Pinyon Jays WSMR ..................................................................................................................................29 Banding ................................................................................................................................................29 Flock Size ............................................................................................................................................30 Location Data .......................................................................................................................................30 Home Ranges .......................................................................................................................................30 Breeding ............................................................................................................................................30 Nonbreeding ......................................................................................................................................30 Combined Breeding and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Field Guide for Managing Rabbitbrush in the Southwest
    United States Department of Agriculture Field Guide for Managing Rabbitbrush in the Southwest Forest Southwestern Service Region TP-R3-16-31 February 2015 Cover Photos Top left: Green rabbitbrush, USDA Forest Service Top right: Green rabbitbrush flowers, Mary Ellen Harte, Bugwood.org Bottom left: Rubber rabbitbrush flowers, USDA Forest Service Bottom right: Rubber rabbitbrush, USDA Forest Service The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on recycled paper Green Rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus) Rubber Rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus nauseosus, syn. Ericameria nauseosa) Sunflower family (Asteraceae) Green and rubber rabbitbrush are native shrubs that grow Some species are widespread geographically, and some are widely across western U.S. rangelands. Though they can restricted to a limited area. The specific rabbitbrush species appear as a weedy monoculture (especially following of concern should always be known before proceeding with disturbance), they are early colonizers and their presence management.
    [Show full text]
  • Pines in the Arboretum
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MtJ ARBORETUM REVIEW No. 32-198 PETER C. MOE Pines in the Arboretum Pines are probably the best known of the conifers native to The genus Pinus is divided into hard and soft pines based on the northern hemisphere. They occur naturally from the up­ the hardness of wood, fundamental leaf anatomy, and other lands in the tropics to the limits of tree growth near the Arctic characteristics. The soft or white pines usually have needles in Circle and are widely grown throughout the world for timber clusters of five with one vascular bundle visible in cross sec­ and as ornamentals. In Minnesota we are limited by our cli­ tions. Most hard pines have needles in clusters of two or three mate to the more cold hardy species. This review will be with two vascular bundles visible in cross sections. For the limited to these hardy species, their cultivars, and a few hy­ discussion here, however, this natural division will be ignored brids that are being evaluated at the Arboretum. and an alphabetical listing of species will be used. Where neces­ Pines are readily distinguished from other common conifers sary for clarity, reference will be made to the proper groups by their needle-like leaves borne in clusters of two to five, of particular species. spirally arranged on the stem. Spruce (Picea) and fir (Abies), Of the more than 90 species of pine, the following 31 are or for example, bear single leaves spirally arranged. Larch (Larix) have been grown at the Arboretum. It should be noted that and true cedar (Cedrus) bear their leaves in a dense cluster of many of the following comments and recommendations are indefinite number, whereas juniper (Juniperus) and arborvitae based primarily on observations made at the University of (Thuja) and their related genera usually bear scalelikie or nee­ Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, and plant performance dlelike leaves that are opposite or borne in groups of three.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcclinton Unr 0139M 13052.Pdf
    University of Nevada, Reno Habitat preferences, intraspecific variation, and restoration of a rare soil specialist in northern Nevada A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Natural Resources and Environmental Science by Jamey D. McClinton Dr. Elizabeth A. Leger/Thesis Advisor December, 2019 Copyright by Jamey D. McClinton 2019 All Rights Reserved We recommend that the thesis prepared under our supervision by Jamey D. McClinton Entitled Habitat preferences, intraspecific variation, and restoration of a rare soil specialist in northern Nevada be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Elizabeth Leger, Ph.D., Advisor Paul Verburg, Ph.D., Committee member Thomas Parchman, Ph.D., Graduate School Representative David W. Zeh, Ph.D., Dean, Graduate School December-2019 i Abstract Edaphic specialization in plants is associated with the development of novel adaptations that frequently lead to speciation, causing unique edaphic environments to be associated with rare and endemic plant species worldwide. These species contribute significantly to global biodiversity, but are especially vulnerable to disturbance and climate change because of their inherently patchy distributions and locally adapted populations. Successful conservation of these species depends upon understanding their habitat requirements and the amounts and distributions of genetic and phenotypic diversity among populations. Little is known about the habitat requirements or
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Pinyon-Juniper Woodlands
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Chapter 6 Pinyon-Juniper Woodlands Gerald J. Gottfried, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Flagstaff, Arizona Thomas W. Swetnam, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona Craig D. Allen, USDI National Biological Service, Los,Alamos, New Mexico Julio L. Betancourt, USDI Geological Survey, Tucson, Arizona Alice L. Chung-MacCoubrey, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Albuquerque, New Mexico INTRODUCTION system management generally is accepted, the USDA Forest Service, other public land management agen­ Pinyon-juniper woodlands are one of the largest cies, American Indian tribes, and private landown­ ecosystems in the Southwest and in the Middle Rio ers may have differing definitions of what constitutes Grande Basin (Fig. 1). The woodlands have been desired conditions. important to the region's inhabitants since prehis­ Key questions about the pinyon-juniper ecosys­ toric times for a variety of natural resources and tems remain unanswered. Some concern the basic amenities. The ecosystems have not been static; their dynamics of biological and physical components of distributions, stand characteristics, and site condi­ the pinyon-juniper ecosystems. Others concern the tions have been altered by changes in climatic pat­ distribution of woodlands prior to European settle­ terns and human use and, often, abuse. Management ment and changes since the introduction of livestock of these lands since European settlement has varied and fire control. This relates to whether tree densi­ from light exploitation and benign neglect, to attempts ties have been increasing or whether trees are invad­ to remove the trees in favor of forage for livestock, and ing grasslands and, to a lesser extent, drier ponde­ then to a realization that these lands contain useful re­ rosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Long Walk National Historic Trail Feasibility Study / Environmental Impact Statement Arizona • New Mexico
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Draft Long Walk National Historic Trail Feasibility Study / Environmental Impact Statement Arizona • New Mexico DRAFT LONG WALK NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Thanks to the New Mexico Humanities Council and the Western National Parks and Monuments Association for their important contributions to this study. DRAFT LONG WALK NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Apache, Coconino, Navajo Counties, Arizona; Bernalillo, Cibola, De Baca, Guadalupe, Lincoln, McKinley, Mora, Otero, Santa Fe, Sandoval, Torrance, Valencia Counties, New Mexico The purpose of this study is to evaluate the suitability and feasibility of designating the routes known as the “Long Walk” of the Mescalero Apache and the Navajo people (1862-1868) as a national historic trail under the study provisions of the National Trails System Act (Public Law 90-543). This study provides necessary information for evaluating the national significance of the Long Walk, which refers to the U.S. Army’s removal of the Mescalero Apache and Navajo people from their homelands to the Bosque Redondo Reservation in eastern New Mexico, and for potential designation of a national historic trail. Detailed administrative recommendations would be developed through the subsequent preparation of a comprehensive management plan if a national historic trail is designated. The three criteria for national historic trails, as defined in the National Trails System Act, have been applied and have been met for the proposed Long Walk National Historic Trail. The trail routes possess a high degree of integrity and significant potential for historical interest based on historic interpretation and appreciation.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinyon Jay Movement, Nest Site Selection, Nest Fate
    PINYON JAY MOVEMENT, NEST SITE SELECTION, NEST FATE, AND RENESTING IN CENTRAL NEW MEXICO By MICHAEL COULTER NOVAK Bachelor of Science in Zoology University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara, California 2010 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December, 2019 PINYON JAY MOVEMENT, NEST SITE SELECTION, NEST FATE, AND RENESTING IN CENTRAL NEW MEXICO Thesis Approved: Dr. Loren M. Smith Thesis Adviser Dr. Scott T. McMurry Dr. Craig A. Davis ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to thank my advisor, Dr. Loren Smith, for his expert assistance guiding me through my thesis. Through his mentorship I learned to be a more effective writer and scientist. Thank you to my committee members, Dr. Scott McMurry and Dr. Craig Davis, for their valuable input on my research. Much thanks to Oklahoma State University for providing excellent academic resources and being a great place to develop professional skills required for today’s workforce. I want to thank my parents, Michael Novak and Kathleen Murphy, who have always encouraged me to work hard and be happy. I’m especially grateful for their understanding and encouragement throughout my transient career as a seasonal field biologist. Thanks, Dad, for encouraging me to find a job where they pay me to travel. Thanks, Mom, for encouraging me to pursue higher education and for keeping me on track. Thanks to my sister, Marisol Novak, for her siblingship and being a willing ear to vent my problems to. My family has always believed in me and they inspire me to continue putting one foot in front of the other, even when things are difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Hazard Map, Gila-Las Cruces BLM Dispatch Zone - 2015
    Flight Hazard Map, Gila-Las Cruces BLM Dispatch Zone - 2015 Gila - Las Cruces Dispatch Zone A1 Atlas Page60 Name Index Quemado General Legend 60 Springerville Datil Socorro US Forest Service Fish and Wildlife Service Major Reservoir Aragon Luna B1 B2 380 Reserve FS Wilderness Tribal Lands Major Stream 25 Ruidoso FS Primitive Area National Park Service Interstate Winston 54 Glenwood Truth or 70 191 Consequences Bureau of Land Mgmt. Private U.S. Highway 180 C1 C2 Cliff Kingston Alamogordo Silver Mimbres City BLM Wilderness State State Highway 70 70 BLM WSA State Game and Fish District Office Las Lordsburg D1 Cruces Deming D2 10 Bureau of Reclamation State or Local Park Forest Service Facility Dept. of Agriculture Other Federal Agency Supervisors Office El Paso 62 Socorro E1 E2 Dept. of Defense Mexico Dept. of Energy Urban Area Flight Hazards Legend Helipad/Heliport Visual Route Leg Identifier Wind Hazard Atlas Page Scale Lookout Visual Route Windfarm > 200 ft AGL 1:400,000 Repeater Visual Route Outer Boundary Military Operations Area (MOA) 1 inch = 6.3 miles Local Airstrip Slow Route Leg Identifier Prohibited, Restricted or Warning Area (Printed on 11" x 17" landscape layout) Civil Heliport Slow Route Air Refueling Route (AFR) 0 5 10 20 Civil Airport w/Facilities Slow Route Outer Boundary AFR Airspace Miles Civil Airport w/o Facilities Instrument Route Leg Identifier Parachute Jumping Area Military Airport Instrument Route Dispatch Area Tower/Building < 200 ft AGL Instrument Route Outer Boundary Tower/Building > 200 ft AGL Major Power Transmission
    [Show full text]
  • Features of the Tularosa Basin Place Names in New Mexico, As You Might Imagine, Often Derive from Native American, Spanish, and Anglo Words and Family Names
    National Park Service White Sands Department of the Interior White Sands National Monument Features of the Tularosa Basin Place names in New Mexico, as you might imagine, often derive from Native American, Spanish, and Anglo words and family names. The Tularosa Basin is no exception—the word “tularosa” is Spanish for “reddish reeds.” Like much of the American Southwest, the basin is full of such colorful place names. Below you’ll find a description of the most significant features, arranged to correspond with the accompanying map. The Chupadera Mesa is an upland rising at the north end of the Tularosa Basin. Chupadera probably refers to “sinkholes”—although geographer T. M. Pearce says that it could also refer to “sucking insects.” Chupadero The Oscura Mountains form the northwest border of the Tularosa Mesa basin. Oscura means “dark” in Spanish, and with their piñon and juniper forested tops, the Oscura Mountains can appear darker than the neighboring San Andres Mountain range to the south. The highest elevation in the range is Oscura Peak at 8,732 feet high. The San Andres Mountains border the Tularosa Basin on the west. The range extends approximately 75 miles north to south. The highest Oscura point is Salinas Peak, with an elevation just under 9,000 feet. The Mountains southern San Andres Mountains are home to a wildlife refuge of the same name. However, the San Andres National Wildlife Refuge and the San Andres Mountains are within the boundaries of the White * Carrizozo Sands Missile Range and therefore closed to public access. The Oscura Mountains to the north are separated from the San Andres range at Mockingbird Gap, while the Organ Mountains to the south are separated from the San Andres by San Augustin Pass.
    [Show full text]
  • Dye Plant of the Month: Rabbitbrush, Rubber Rabbitbrush, Chamisa (Ericameria Nauseosa, Formerly Chrysothamnus Nauseosus)
    Dye Plant of the Month: Rabbitbrush, rubber rabbitbrush, chamisa (Ericameria nauseosa, formerly Chrysothamnus nauseosus) Plant Family: Asteraceae (Compositae) Description: Perennial; rounded shrubs or subshrubs, 12 – 90” tall, with yellow flower clusters in late summer – early fall. When crushed, gives off a foul-smelling odor. Origin and Current Range: Native to western half of U.S. and Canada. Found in most counties in Colorado. Habitat: Full sun; dry, sandy, gravelly, or heavy clayey and alkali soils. Often found on poorly managed rangelands, in disturbed areas along roadways and on abandoned agricultural land. Reproduction and Cultivation: Reproduces from seeds and root sprouts. Can be pruned back to several inches in spring to improve its ornamental value. Dye Color and Parts Used for Dye: Yellow dyes produced from flower clusters and twigs in wool mordanted with alum. Other Information: Flowers and stems used by the Navajo and Zuñi as a dye source; the stems also used to make baskets. Useful as forage for wildlife, especially during winter months when the chemical compounds in the plants are less potent. First plant to be tested during WW I and again during WWII as a source of rubber. Possible source of bio-fuel. Gaining popularity as a xeriscaping shrub. References: 1. Bliss, Anne. 1976. Rocky Mountain Dye Plants. Published by Anne Bliss. 2. Krochmal, Arnold and Connie. 1974. The Complete Illustrated Book of Dyes from Natural Sources. Doubleday and Company, N.Y. 3. Bryan, Nonabah G., Stella Young and Charles Keetsie Shirley. 1940. US Dept. of the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs Division of Education. 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho's Special Status Vascular and Nonvascular Plants Conservation Rankings
    Idaho's Special Status Vascular and Nonvascular Plants Conservation Rankings 1 IDNHP Tracked Species Conservation Rankings Date USFS_ USFS_ USFS_ 2 Scientific Name Synonyms Common Name G-Rank S-Rank USFWS BLM Ranked R1 R4 R6 Abronia elliptica dwarf sand-verbena G5 S1 Feb-14 Abronia mellifera white sand-verbena G4 S1S2 Feb-16 Acorus americanus Acorus calamus var. americanus sweetflag G5 S2 Feb-16 Agastache cusickii Agastache cusickii var. parva Cusick's giant-hyssop G3G4 S2 Feb-14 Agoseris aurantiaca var. aurantiaca, Agoseris lackschewitzii pink agoseris G4 S1S2 4 S Feb-16 A. aurantiaca var. carnea Agrimonia striata roadside agrimonia G5 S1 Feb-16 Aliciella triodon Gilia triodon; G. leptomeria (in part) Coyote gilia G5 S1 Feb-20 Allenrolfea occidentalis Halostachys occidentalis iodinebush G4 S1 Feb-16 Allium aaseae Aase's Onion G2G3+ S2S3 2 Oct-11 Allium anceps Kellogg's Onion G4 S2S3 4 Feb-20 Allium columbianum Allium douglasii var. columbianum Columbia onion G3 S3 Feb-16 Allium madidum swamp onion G3 S3 S Allium tolmiei var. persimile Sevendevils Onion G4G5T3+ S3 4 S Allium validum tall swamp onion G4 S3 Allotropa virgata sugarstick G4 S3 S Amphidium californicum California amphidium moss G4 S1 Feb-16 Anacolia menziesii var. baueri Bauer's anacolia moss G4 TNR S2 Feb-20 Andreaea heinemannii Heinemann's andreaea moss G3G5 S1 Feb-14 Andromeda polifolia bog rosemary G5 S1 S Andromeda polifolia var. polifolia bog rosemary G5T5 S1 Feb-20 Anemone cylindrica long-fruit anemone G5 S1 Feb-20 Angelica kingii Great Basin angelica G4 S1 3 Mar-18 Antennaria arcuata meadow pussytoes G2 S1 Mar-18 Argemone munita ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Intermountain Native Plants Cooperative
    Report of the Intermountain Native Plants Cooperative Volume 1 December 2009 An annual report of research and extension activities for members of WERA-1013, Intermountain Regional Evaluation and Introduction of Native Plants Report of the Intermountain Native Plants Cooperative Number 1 – December 2009 Forward The Intermountain Native Plants Cooperative, initiated in 2007, is a group of researchers who share an interest in utilizing native plants in arid urban landscapes, sharing research-based information, and exchanging superior germplasm. All are members of WERA-1013, Intermountain Regional Evaluation and Introduction of Native Plants, an officially recognized Western Education/Extension and Research Activity. The Report of the Intermountain Native Plants Cooperative is published annually and contains announcements of studies in progress by members and updates of germplasm evaluations. Some of the various research reports include work on such diverse topics as the selection criteria of native plants for urban landscapes, sexual and asexual propagation techniques of unique plants, native plant breeding techniques, native plant genetic diversity studies, evaluations on weediness of native plants in the urban landscapes and many other native plant related studies. Cover: The photo on the cover was taken by Mikel R. Stevens and is of Penstemon petiolatus Brandegee in the Mojave Desert of Washington Co. Utah. TABLE OF CONTENTS NPC REPORT 1, 2009 Table of Contents Forward .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountains
    MONARCH NECTAR PLANTS Rocky Mountains Left to right: Monarch on swamp milkweed, littleflower penstemon, and Rocky Mountain blazing star. The Rocky Mountains region spans large sections of Idaho, it is important to protect and restore habitat across their entire Montana, Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, and New Mexico. range. Adult monarchs depend on diverse nectar sources for It is characterized by some of the tallest mountains in the food during all stages of the year, from spring and summer continental U.S. and is home to diverse forests, serpentine breeding to fall migration and overwintering. Inadequate river canyons, and high alpine zones. A huge variety of plants milkweed and nectar plant food sources at any point may and wildflowers, from tiny alpine blooms to large stands of impact the number of monarchs that successfully arrive at rabbitbrush and goldenrod, can be found in this region. These overwintering sites in the fall. plant communities support numerous pollinators and other Providing milkweeds and other nectar-rich flowers wildlife, including summer-visiting monarch butterflies. that bloom where and when monarchs need them is one of Each spring, monarchs leave overwintering sites in the most significant actions you can take to support monarch central Mexico and along the California coast and fan out butterfly populations. This guide features Rocky Mountain across the North American landscape to breed and lay eggs native plants that have documented monarch visitation, on milkweed, the monarch’s host plant. Several generations bloom during the times of year when monarchs are present are likely produced during this time. In the fall, adults migrate in this region, are commercially available, and are known to back to the overwintering sites, where they generally remain be hardy.
    [Show full text]