DOCSLIB.ORG

Montezuma Castle National Monument/Tuzigoot National

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Montezuma Castle National Monument/Tuzigoot National Montezuma Castle National Monument National Park Service Tuzigoot National Monument U.S. Department of the Interior Arizona MONTEZUMA CASTLE MONTEZUMAWELL TUZIGOOT GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN /ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT General Management Plan / Environmental Assessment MONTEZUMA CASTLE NATIONAL MONUMENT AND TUZIGOOT NATIONAL MONUMENT Yavapai County, Arizona January 2010 As the responsible agency, the National Park Service prepared this general management plan to establish the direction of management of Montezuma Castle National Monument and Tu- zigoot National Monument for the next 15 to 20 years. The general management plan pro- vides comprehensive, integrated guidance for preserving cultural resources, perpetuating natural systems, providing opportunities for visitor enjoyment and understanding, and estab- lishing the organizational mechanism to accomplish the plan. The previous general management plan for Montezuma Castle and Tuzigoot national mo- numents was completed in 1975. Since then, much has changed, including visitor use pat- terns, land uses in the Verde Valley outside the monuments, and area populations. These changes affect how visitors access and use the national monuments, the facilities needed to support those uses, management of resources, and how the National Park Service manages its operations. Therefore, a new plan is needed to allow the monuments to achieve desired conditions that implement goals of the National Park Service and the public for management and preservation of cultural and natural resources. The environmental assessment that was prepared to determine the impacts of the general management plan considered three alternatives: • Alternative A, the no-action alternative; • Alternative B, which is the National Park Service preferred alternative and emphasizes opportunities to connect the monuments, including Montezuma Well (a detached unit of Montezuma Castle National Monument), with improved regional orientation to the Verde Valley; and • Alternative C, which emphasizes self-discovery of the monuments’ resources. The environmental assessment was prepared in compliance with the National Environmen- tal Policy Act to provide the decision-making framework that 1) analyzes a reasonable range of alternatives to meet objectives of the proposal, 2) evaluates potential issues and impacts to the monuments’ resources and values, and 3) identifies mitigation measures to lessen the de- gree or extent of these impacts. Resource topics included in this document because impacts may be greater than minor include cultural resources, natural resources, visitor use and expe- rience, socioeconomics, and monument operations. Other resource topics were dismissed because the plan would result in negligible or minor effects. No major effects are anticipated as a result of this plan. Public scoping was conducted to assist with the development of this document, and comments received during scoping are to a great extent reflected in the con- tent of this document and were considered in the development of the action alternatives. U.S. Department of the Interior ● National Park Service i HOW TO COMMENT ON THIS PLAN If you wish to comment on the environmental assessment, you may post comments online at http://parkplanning.nps.gov/moca. You may mail comments to Montezuma Castle and Tuzigoot National Monuments General Management Plan National Park Service Denver Service Center Attn: Cynthia Nelson P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225 You may also hand deliver comments to Montezuma Castle and Tuzigoot National Monu- ment Headquarters, 527 South Main Street, Camp Verde, Arizona. This environmental assessment will be on public review for 30 days. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment – including your personal identify- ing information – may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. ii SUMMARY PURPOSE AND NEED FOR A changes affect how visitors access and use GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN the national monuments, the facilities needed to support those uses, manage- The purpose of this general management ment of resources, and how the National plan is to establish a clear vision for the Park Service (NPS) manages its opera- direction of management of Montezuma tions. Therefore, a new plan is needed to: Castle and Tuzigoot national monuments for the next 15 to 20 years. The general • Set forth the basic management phi- management plan will provide compre- losophy or vision for Montezuma Cas- hensive and integrated guidance for pre- tle and Tuzigoot national monuments serving cultural resources, perpetuating and provide strategies for achieving natural systems, providing opportunities identified management objectives for visitor enjoyment and understanding, (“desired future conditions”). and establishing the organizational me- • Clearly define resource conditions chanism to accomplish the plan. and visitor use and experience to be Montezuma Castle National Monument achieved in the monuments. was established in 1906 under the authori- • Identify the kinds of resource protec- ty of the Antiquities Act. Since then, Con- tion, management, use, and develop- gress passed legislation in 1937, 1959, ment that will be appropriate in 1978, and 2003 expanding the boundary of achieving and maintaining those con- the monument to better protect the natu- ditions. ral and cultural resources adjacent to the cliff dwellings. • Identify future partnerships and colla- borative planning efforts that would Montezuma Well was added as a detached facilitate the realization of the monu- unit of Montezuma Castle National Mo- ments’ goals. nument by an Act of Congress in 1943. Congress expanded the boundary of the • Provide a framework for the monu- well site in 1959 to protect resources adja- ments’ managers to use to make deci- cent to the well and for administrative sions about protecting Montezuma purposes. Castle and Tuzigoot national monu- ments’ resources, provide quality visi- Tuzigoot National Monument was estab- tor use and experience, manage visitor lished by presidential proclamation on use, and determine the kinds of facili- July 25, 1939, to protect the prehistoric ties, if any, to develop in and near the structures. The boundary was expanded monuments. by an Act of Congress in 1965 and again in 1978. Additional lands were conveyed through a land exchange in 2005. The last comprehensive planning effort (general management plan) for Montezu- ma Castle and Tuzigoot national monu- ments was completed in 1975. Since then, much has changed, including patterns and types of visitor use, land uses in the Verde Valley outside the monu- ments, and area populations. These iii • Ensure that the basic foundation for tions and visitor facilities would remain in decision-making has been developed place. Opportunities for close contact be- in consultation with interested stake- tween visitors and the natural and cultural holders and adopted by the NPS lea- resources at the sites would continue to be dership after an adequate analysis of limited. The interpretive emphasis would the benefits, impacts, and economic continue to focus on the three primary costs of alternative courses of action. sites within the monuments, with little connection among the sites in terms of • Investigate the potential for boundary interpretation. modifications. At Montezuma Castle, resource activities ALTERNATIVES AND would continue to focus on stabilizing the THEIR IMPACTS primary site, with intensive preservation treatment and regular cyclic maintenance. This General Management Plan and Envi- Visitor opportunities would continue to ronmental Assessment presents three alter- focus on viewing the Castle and visiting natives for management of Montezuma the visitor center. Existing administration Castle and Tuzigoot national monuments. facilities would remain the same. They include: At Montezuma Well, resource activities • Alternative A, the no-action alterna- would continue to focus on monitoring tive (continue current management); water quantity. Visitor opportunities • Alternative B, the National Park Ser- would continue to focus on viewing Mon- vice preferred alternative, which em- tezuma Well and visiting the well outlet. phasizes opportunities to connect the The picnic area would continue to be a three sites with improved regional major draw for local visitation. orientation to the Verde Valley; and At Tuzigoot, resource activities would • Alternative C, which emphasizes self- continue to focus on stabilizing the prima- discovery of the monuments’ re- ry site, with intensive preservation treat- sources. ment and regular cyclic maintenance. Visi- tor opportunities would continue to focus The alternatives, which are based on the on exploring the pueblo and visiting the monuments’ mission, purpose, and signi- visitor center/museum. ficance, present different ways to manage resources and visitor use and improve fa- Although the no-action alternative may cilities and infrastructure. Additional ac- not meet all goals set forth for this general tions and alternatives were considered but management plan, it serves as the baseline were dismissed for the reasons described against which the action alternatives are in chapter 2. evaluated. The important impacts of con- tinuing existing management conditions Alternative A: The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2010 General Management Plan
    Montezuma Castle National Monument National Park Service Mo n t e z u M a Ca s t l e na t i o n a l Mo n u M e n t • tu z i g o o t na t i o n a l Mo n u M e n t Tuzigoot National Monument U.S. Department of the Interior ge n e r a l Ma n a g e M e n t Pl a n /en v i r o n M e n t a l as s e s s M e n t Arizona M o n t e z u MONTEZU M A CASTLE MONTEZU M A WELL TUZIGOOT M g a e n e r a l C a s t l e M n a n a g e a t i o n a l M e n t M P o n u l a n M / e n t e n v i r o n • t u z i g o o t M e n t a l n a a t i o n a l s s e s s M e n t M o n u M e n t na t i o n a l Pa r k se r v i C e • u.s. De P a r t M e n t o f t h e in t e r i o r GENERAL MANA G E M ENT PLAN /ENVIRON M ENTAL ASSESS M ENT General Management Plan / Environmental Assessment MONTEZUMA CASTLE NATIONAL MONUMENT AND TUZIGOOT NATIONAL MONUMENT Yavapai County, Arizona January 2010 As the responsible agency, the National Park Service prepared this general management plan to establish the direction of management of Montezuma Castle National Monument and Tu- zigoot National Monument for the next 15 to 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Free PDF Download
    ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST CONTINUE ON TO THE NEXT PAGE FOR YOUR magazineFREE PDF (formerly the Center for Desert Archaeology) is a private 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization that explores and protects the places of our past across the American Southwest and Mexican Northwest. We have developed an integrated, conservation- based approach known as Preservation Archaeology. Although Preservation Archaeology begins with the active protection of archaeological sites, it doesn’t end there. We utilize holistic, low-impact investigation methods in order to pursue big-picture questions about what life was like long ago. As a part of our mission to help foster advocacy and appreciation for the special places of our past, we share our discoveries with the public. This free back issue of Archaeology Southwest Magazine is one of many ways we connect people with the Southwest’s rich past. Enjoy! Not yet a member? Join today! Membership to Archaeology Southwest includes: » A Subscription to our esteemed, quarterly Archaeology Southwest Magazine » Updates from This Month at Archaeology Southwest, our monthly e-newsletter » 25% off purchases of in-print, in-stock publications through our bookstore » Discounted registration fees for Hands-On Archaeology classes and workshops » Free pdf downloads of Archaeology Southwest Magazine, including our current and most recent issues » Access to our on-site research library » Invitations to our annual members’ meeting, as well as other special events and lectures Join us at archaeologysouthwest.org/how-to-help In the meantime, stay informed at our regularly updated Facebook page! 300 N Ash Alley, Tucson AZ, 85701 • (520) 882-6946 • [email protected] • www.archaeologysouthwest.org ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST SPRING 2014 A QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF ARCHAEOLOGYmagazine SOUTHWEST VOLUME 28 | NUMBER 2 A Good Place to Live for more than 12,000 Years Archaeology in Arizona's Verde Valley 3 A Good Place to Live for More Than 12,000 Years: Archaeology ISSUE EDITOR: in Arizona’s Verde Valley, Todd W.
    [Show full text]
  • National Parks of the Southwest October 27-November 5, 2021
    National Parks of the Southwest October 27-November 5, 2021 10 days for $3,995 total price from Boston This tour is provided by Odysseys Unlimited, six-time honoree Travel & Leisure’s World’s Best Tour Operators award. An Exclusive Small Group Tour for Alumni, Family, and Friends of Tufts University Dear Alumni, Parents, and Friends of Tufts, We invite you to join us on an exclusive 10-day tour through the scenic Southwest, experiencing breathtaking natural scenery at every turn. Begin your journey in Phoenix, Arizona, with leisure time to explore the capital city as you wish. Head north to stunning Sedona and tour the Honanki Heritage Site. Then, a highlight of the tour, the Grand Canyon! Next head to Page, Arizona, to visit Upper Antelope Canyon. Starting at the base of imposing Glen Canyon Dam, float down the smooth waters of the Colorado River on a motorized rafting excursion. Depart for southern Utah to explore both stunning Bryce Canyon National Park. The tour ends with a celebratory final dinner and overnight in Las Vegas. There’s limited availability for this small-group Tufts journey, so seize the moment and make your reservations now. Your deposit is fully refundable up until 95 days before departure. Call our tour operator, Odysseys Unlimited, Inc., at 888-370-6765 to book risk-free! Warmly, Online: go.tufts.edu/travel_learn E-mail: [email protected] Mary Ann R. Hunt @tuftsalumni Associate Director, Tufts Travel-Learn Program @tuftsalumni #TuftsTravelLearn P.S. Even though non-essential travel is discouraged at the time of printing this brochure, we remain very hopeful we will be able to travel again by the time of departure.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3. Management Areas
    Chapter 3. Management Areas Introduction to Management Areas Management areas are areas that have similar management intent and a common management strategy that are more specific than forestwide guidance provided in Chapter 2. This direction does not substitute for or repeat forestwide direction, but rather provides additional direction for the applicable area. In the event that a plan decision in this section and the forestwide component in another section conflict, the more restrictive plan decision generally prevails. A project or activity-level evaluation, however, may be required to resolve the conflict; generally, however, the more restrictive plan decision prevails. Some management areas are special areas that have been designated by Congress or an office of the Executive Branch. They are managed to protect the special features or character for which they were designated and must be managed in accordance with relevant law, regulation, and policy and any area- specific management plan, such as the Verde River Comprehensive River Management Plan. Because of the complication of carrying forward direction from the previous forest plan there are two management areas that overlay the Sedona-Oak Creek Management Area (MA). The Oak Creek Canyon and House Mountain-Lowlands MAs are both subject to direction for the Sedona-Oak Creek MA and have unique direction that applies only to these overlay areas. In addition, there are several guidelines in the Sedona-Oak Creek MA to which the House Mountain-Lowlands MA is an exception. Scenery desired conditions (desired landscape character) for wilderness and wild and scenic rivers is described in the MA direction. For other management areas, see the Landscape Character Zones for this direction.
    [Show full text]
  • A General Historic Properties Treatment Plan for Archaeological Investigations Associated with FCC Cell Tower Construction Projects on Private Lands in Arizona
    A General Historic Properties Treatment Plan for Archaeological Investigations Associated With FCC Cell Tower Construction Projects on Private Lands in Arizona Prepared for: Verizon Wireless Tempe, Arizona Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. Tempe, Arizona Terracon Project No. 65157582 August 2018 ABSTRACT Report Title: A General Historic Properties Treatment Plan for Archaeological Investigations Associated with FCC Cell Tower Construction Projects on Private Lands in Arizona Report Date: August 2018 Agencies: Federal Communications Commission, Arizona State Historic Preservation Office Project Sponsor: Verizon Wireless (Verizon) Project Description: Verizon constructs and collocates telecommunications facilities in Arizona. Due to the involvement of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the projects, they are considered federal undertakings subject to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The Arizona State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) reviews FCC-licensed undertakings pursuant to two nationwide programmatic agreements. Some of Verizon’s proposed undertakings may be found by the FCC and SHPO to have an adverse effect on historic properties listed in, or eligible for listing in, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The purpose of this General Historic Properties Treatment Plan (General HPTP) is to streamline the resolution of adverse effects to historic properties listed in, or eligible for listing in, the NRHP by Verizon-sponsored undertakings on private lands in Arizona. This streamlined resolution will also include the preparation of a project-specific addendum to the General HPTP. The General HPTP does not apply to state, county, municipal, or Tribal lands including private lands within tribal reservation boundaries, or to lands under federal jurisdiction. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1.
    [Show full text]
  • KIVA INDEX: Volumes 1 Through 83
    1 KIVA INDEX: Volumes 1 through 83 This index combines five previously published Kiva indexes and adds index entries for the most recent completed volumes of Kiva. Nancy Bannister scanned the indexes for volumes 1 through 60 into computer files that were manipulated for this combined index. The first published Kiva index was prepared in 1966 by Elizabeth A.M. Gell and William J. Robinson. It included volumes 1 through 30. The second index includes volumes 31 through 40; it was prepared in 1975 by Wilma Kaemlein and Joyce Reinhart. The third, which covers volumes 41 through 50, was prepared in 1988 by Mike Jacobs and Rosemary Maddock. The fourth index, compiled by Patrick D. Lyons, Linda M. Gregonis, and Helen C. Hayes, was prepared in 1998 and covers volumes 51 through 60. I prepared the index that covers volumes 61 through 70. It was published in 2006 as part of Kiva volume 71, number 4. Brid Williams helped proofread the index for volumes 61 through 70. To keep current with our volume publication and the needs of researchers for on-line information, the Arizona Archaeological and Historical Society board decided that it would be desirable to add entries for each new volume as they were finished. I have added entries for volumes 71 through 83 to the combined index. It is the Society's goal to continue to revise this index on a yearly basis. As might be expected, the styles of the previously published indexes varied, as did the types of entries found. I changed some entries to reflect current terminology.
    [Show full text]
  • Q. What Is a Docent? a Docent Is Someone Who Interacts with the Public at the Forest Service Heritage Sites in the Sedona Area
    Cultural Resources / Becoming a Docent FAQ September 2018 Q. What is a docent? A docent is someone who interacts with the public at the Forest Service heritage sites in the Sedona area. The goal is to provide interpretation of the site for a greater visitor experience, education on site etiquette for these sites and any other sites that the visitor may encounter on their own, and protect the site by monitoring for inappropriate behavior by visitors. Q. Where do docents volunteer? Volunteers have a choice of working at the three Heritage sites in the Red Rock district of the Coconino National Forest: Palatki, V-Bar-V, or Honanki. You can elect to volunteer at any or all of these sites. Website: http://www.fs.usda.gov/detailfull/coconino/recreation/?cid=stelprdb5299994&width=full Q. Why are docents needed? We receive 25,000 visitors at each site each year. Due to past (and recent) issues with graffiti and ongoing threat of abuse, these sites are only open to the public on fixed days and hours. Specific areas are viewable only if there is a docent present to monitor, interpret, and educate. Q. What are the working hours? Palatki and V-Bar-V are open from 9:30 am until 3:30 pm. Honanki is open from 9:30 am until 4:00 pm. It is usually recommended that a volunteer spend an entire day at Palatki. V-Bar-V is conducive to full day or half day shifts. Q. What days can I volunteer? Palatki is open 363 days a year (Closed for Thanksgiving and Christmas) V-Bar-V is open Friday through Monday.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet Overview
    southwestlearning.org MONTEZUMA WELL Prehistory FACTOVERVIEW SHEET USGS/R.H. JOHNSON Montezuma Well, located in the Verde Valley of north-central Arizona, is a natural sinkhole that formed some 11,000 years ago when the limestone roof above collapsed. The Well was long the home of first Hohokam, Sinagua, and later, Yavapai and Apache people, and remains a source of irrigation water for the Verde Valley to this day. The Well is also a unique habitat in which several species are endemic (found nowhere else in the world), having adapted to the Well’s distinctive wa- ter chemistry. Environment The water in Montezuma Well has unusually high levels of dissolved carbon dioxide (nearly 100 times higher than most aquatic environments) and arsenic, as well as calcium and other chemicals. This combination prevents fish from living Looking south across Montezuma Well. within the Well, but is also responsible for the evolution of the five endemic species found within the Well: a diatom Gom( - allela montezuma), a leech (Motobdella montezuma), a water phonema montezumense), an amphipod (side-swimmers; Hy- scorpion (Ranatra montezuma), and a spring snail (Pyrgulop- sis montezuma), as well as several other species suspected of being endemic, but not yet formally described as such. Phytoplankton serve as the base of the Well’s simple food chain. These are eaten by the amphipods, which in turn, are eaten by the leeches. Each day at sunset, the amphipods rise to the surface to feed on algae, and the leeches follow, hunting the amphipods in the dark of the night (Govidich and Bain 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • 100 AZ Arch Sites to Visit
    100 AZ Arch Sites to Visit Archaeological Site Site Area Closest City Culture Site Type Land Manager Website Agua Fria National Bureau of Land https://foursquare.com/v/agua-fria-national-monument-1891-school- 1 1891 School House Monument Cordes Lakes Territorial Historic ranching Management house/4f26dda3e4b04d36e04be1f3 Roy P. Drachman, Agua Archaic, Pima County Natural Fria Caliente Regional Hohokam, Prehistoric; historic Resources, Parks 2 Agua Caliente Ranch Park Tucson Territorial ranching and Recreation http://www.pima.gov/nrpr/parks/agua_caliente/ 3 American Flag Mine Oracle-American Flag Oracle Territorial Historic mining City of Oracle http://oracletown.com/history.html Arivaca Pima, Protohistoric, 4 Arivaca Townsite Arivaca Townsite Territorial Historic mining City of Arivaca http://www.arivaca.net/ Agua Fria National Black Canyon Perry Mesa Prehistoric Bureau of Land 5 Badger Springs Monument City Complex petroglyphs Management http://www.blm.gov/az/st/en/prog/recreation/hiking/badger-springs.html Besh-Ba-Gowah 6 Besh-ba-gowah Archaeological Park Globe Salado Prehistoric pueblo City of Globe http://www.jqjacobs.net/southwest/besh_ba_gowah.html Tohono O'odham; Native American Mexican and Mexican colonial; settlement; historic ??? Santa Cruz 7 Calabasas Rio Rico Ranch Nogales territorial ranching County http://www.ghosttowns.com/states/az/calabasas.html Native Kingman Arizona Historic American; Prehistoric and 8 Camp Beale Springs Distric Kingman territorial historic springs City of Kingman http://www.mohavemuseum.org/beale.htm
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination Form Location Of
    Form No. 10-306 (Rev. 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS STREET & NUMBER Tuzigoot National Monument - P. 0. Box 68 —NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Clarkdale JL VICINITY OF Third STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Arizona 86324 04 Yavapai 025 QCLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE X.DISTRICT ^puBLIC J&CCUPIED —AGRICULTURE -2MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) _PRIVATE .^UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL _2S>ARK —STRUCTURE __BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _ IN PROCESS —YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED _^ES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION — NC} —MILITARY —OTHER: REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS. (If applicable) Western Regional Office - National Park Service CITY. TOWN San Francisco VICINITY OF LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF DEEDS,ETC. Montezuma Castle National Monument STREET& NUMBER c/o Tuzigoot National Monument, P. 0. Box 68 CITY. TOWN STATE Clarkdale AZ 86324 TITLE Western Archeplogical Center - National Park Service DATE 1946-50, 1952, 1960 X_FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS CITY. TOWN STATE . 0, Bnv 41058 Tucson AZ 85717 CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED X-UNALTERED X_ORIGINAL SITE _GOOD .XRUINS 2LALTERED _MOVED DATE_______ _FAIR —UNEXPOSED 5 sites excavated and stabilized; 4 sites stabilized: excellent state of preserve-inn. DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Montezuma Castle National Monument, situated in the Middle Verde drainage in central Arizona, consists of two separate parcels: (1) the Castle Unit, a 564 acre (.88 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Resources Specialist Report
    Forest Plan Revision DEIS Heritage Resources Specialist Report FINAL Submitted by: __/s/ _________________________ Peter J. Pilles, Jr., Coconino National Forest, Forest Archaeologist Preparers and Contributors section: Peter J. Pilles, Jr. Education: BA, Arizona State University, 1967 Years of Experience: 45 for: Coconino National Forest Date: June 30, 2011 Revised: Sept. 9, 2013 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) Preface The information in this specialist report reflects analysis that was completed prior to and in conjunction with the completion of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the revision of the 1987 Coconino National Forest Land Management Plan (the Plan). The primary purpose of specialist reports associated with the DEIS is to provide detailed information to assist in the preparation of the DEIS. As the DEIS was prepared, review-driven edits to the broader DEIS resulted in modifications to some of the information contained in some of the specialist reports. As a result, some reports no longer contain information and analysis that was updated through an interdisciplinary review process and is included in the DEIS in its entirety.
    [Show full text]
  • Montezuma Castle NM: a Past Preserved in Stone
    Montezuma Castle NM: A Past Preserved in Stone Montezuma Castle National Monument A Past Preserved in Stone: A History of MONTEZUMA CASTLE National Monument Josh Protas ©2002, Western National Parks Association file:///C|/Web/MOCA/protas/index.htm (1 of 2) [9/7/2007 10:44:24 AM] Montezuma Castle NM: A Past Preserved in Stone CONTENTS A Past Preserved in Stone: A History of Montezuma Castle National Monument ©2002, Western National Parks Association protas/index.htm 27-Nov-2002 file:///C|/Web/MOCA/protas/index.htm (2 of 2) [9/7/2007 10:44:24 AM] Montezuma Castle NM: A Past Preserved in Stone (Contents) Montezuma Castle National Monument Contents List of Figures Cover Foreword Acknowledgments Introduction Chapter 1. EXPLORATIONS, IMPRESSIONS, AND EXCAVATIONS The Prehistoric Ruins of the Verde Valley in the Nineteenth Century Chapter 2. THREATS AND RESPONSES The Preservation and Protection of Ruins in the Verde Valley Chapter 3. A CHALLENGE IN PRESERVATION The Early Management of the Monument Chapter 4. THE JACKSON YEARS The Protection, Development, and Promotion of Montezuma Castle National Monument Chapter 5. MOVING ON UP The Modern Development of the Monument Chapter 6. WITHIN A CHANGING LANDSCAPE Managing the Natural Resources of the Monument Chapter 7. FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS Cultural Resource Management at the Monument file:///C|/Web/MOCA/protas/contents.htm (1 of 5) [9/7/2007 10:44:25 AM] Montezuma Castle NM: A Past Preserved in Stone (Contents) Appendix A. Montezuma Castle National Monument Annual Recreational Visitation Appendix B. 1906 Establishment Proclamation Appendix C. 1937 Proclamation Expanding Monument Boundaries Appendix D.
    [Show full text]