DOCSLIB.ORG

Black Bean Aphid Infestation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Black Bean Aphid Infestation Black bean aphid Aphis fabae EXOTIC PEST EXOTIC What crops does it affect? This aphid is a major pest of bean crops where it colonises in large numbers, but it has a very broad host range with over 80 host species including potato, cabbage, cauliflower, radish, celery, capsicum, eggplant, cucumber, beets, cucurbits, chilli, and grain. In addition to the direct damage that aphid feeding – does to plants, aphids can transmit plant viruses CALL THE EXOTIC PLANT PEST HOTLINE IF SUSPECTED IF HOTLINE PEST PLANT EXOTIC THE CALL (many species including potato virus Y), making its potential arrival in Australia a problem for many plant industries, including potatoes. Black bean aphids. What does it look like? Mourad Louadfel, Bugwood.org Black bean aphid is <4mm long, is completely black (or very dark green) in appearance and is usually found clustered together in large numbers. Which part of the plant will be damaged? Whole plant. Along with some feeding damage and secretion of honeydew that causes sooty mould, the main harm that this aphid would bring to potato growers is that it transmits viruses, including potato virus Y (PVY), potato leaf roll virus (PLRV) and potato virus A (PVA). What should I look for? Black bean aphid infestation. Ansel Oommen, Bugwood.org Black bean aphids are usually noticed on plants because of their contrasting colour and the presence of ants. Aphids feed by sucking plant sap, so infested growth is often yellowed and curled. How does it spread? Within a crop the pest spreads by flying. Long distance transport is likely to occur through the movement of infested plants, plant tops, soil or packaging. The aphid overwinters on European spindle plants (commonly found in Australia) and winged aphids spread to host plants in the warmer months. DISCLAIMER: The material in this publication is for general information only and no person should act, or fail to act on the basis of this material without first obtaining professional advice. Plant Health Australia and all persons acting for Plant Health Australia expressly disclaim liability with respect to anything done in reliance on this publication. PHA18-024.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aphis Fabae Scop.) to Field Beans ( Vicia Faba L.
    ANALYSIS OF THE DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE BLACK BEAN APHID ( APHIS FABAE SCOP.) TO FIELD BEANS ( VICIA FABA L.) BY JESUS ANTONIO SALAZAR, ING. AGR. ( VENEZUELA ) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON OCTOBER 1976 IMPERIAL COLLEGE FIELD STATION, SILWOOD PARK, SUNNINGHILL, ASCOT, BERKSHIRE. 2 ABSTRACT The concept of the economic threshold and its importance in pest management programmes is analysed in Chapter I. The significance of plant responses or compensation in the insect-injury-yield relationship is also discussed. The amount of damage in terms of yield loss that results from aphid attack, is analysed by comparing the different components of yield in infested and uninfested plants. In the former, plants were infested at different stages of plant development. The results showed that seed weights, pod numbers and seed numbers in plants infested before the flowering period were significantly less than in plants infested during or after the period of flower setting. The growth pattern and growth analysis in infested and uninfested plants have shown that the rate of leaf production and dry matter production were also more affected when the infestations occurred at early stages of plant development. When field beans were infested during the flowering period and afterwards, the aphid feeding did not affect the rate of leaf and dry matter production. There is some evidence that the rate of leaf area production may increase following moderate aphid attack during this period. The relationship between timing of aphid migration from the wintering host and the stage of plant development are shown to be of considerable significance in determining the economic threshold for A.
    [Show full text]
  • (Pentatomidae) DISSERTATION Presented
    Genome Evolution During Development of Symbiosis in Extracellular Mutualists of Stink Bugs (Pentatomidae) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Alejandro Otero-Bravo Graduate Program in Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology The Ohio State University 2020 Dissertation Committee: Zakee L. Sabree, Advisor Rachelle Adams Norman Johnson Laura Kubatko Copyrighted by Alejandro Otero-Bravo 2020 Abstract Nutritional symbioses between bacteria and insects are prevalent, diverse, and have allowed insects to expand their feeding strategies and niches. It has been well characterized that long-term insect-bacterial mutualisms cause genome reduction resulting in extremely small genomes, some even approaching sizes more similar to organelles than bacteria. While several symbioses have been described, each provides a limited view of a single or few stages of the process of reduction and the minority of these are of extracellular symbionts. This dissertation aims to address the knowledge gap in the genome evolution of extracellular insect symbionts using the stink bug – Pantoea system. Specifically, how do these symbionts genomes evolve and differ from their free- living or intracellular counterparts? In the introduction, we review the literature on extracellular symbionts of stink bugs and explore the characteristics of this system that make it valuable for the study of symbiosis. We find that stink bug symbiont genomes are very valuable for the study of genome evolution due not only to their biphasic lifestyle, but also to the degree of coevolution with their hosts. i In Chapter 1 we investigate one of the traits associated with genome reduction, high mutation rates, for Candidatus ‘Pantoea carbekii’ the symbiont of the economically important pest insect Halyomorpha halys, the brown marmorated stink bug, and evaluate its potential for elucidating host distribution, an analysis which has been successfully used with other intracellular symbionts.
    [Show full text]
  • Correlation of Stylet Activities by the Glassy-Winged Sharpshooter, Homalodisca Coagulata (Say), with Electrical Penetration Graph (EPG) Waveforms
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Journal of Insect Physiology 52 (2006) 327–337 www.elsevier.com/locate/jinsphys Correlation of stylet activities by the glassy-winged sharpshooter, Homalodisca coagulata (Say), with electrical penetration graph (EPG) waveforms P. Houston Joosta, Elaine A. Backusb,Ã, David Morganc, Fengming Yand aDepartment of Entomology, University of Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA bUSDA-ARS Crop Diseases, Pests and Genetics Research Unit, San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center, 9611 South Riverbend Ave, Parlier, CA 93648, USA cCalifornia Department of Food and Agriculture, Mt. Rubidoux Field Station, 4500 Glenwood Dr., Bldg. E, Riverside, CA 92501, USA dCollege of Life Sciences, Peking Univerisity, Beijing, China Received 5 May 2005; received in revised form 29 November 2005; accepted 29 November 2005 Abstract Glassy-winged sharpshooter, Homalodisca coagulata (Say), is an efficient vector of Xylella fastidiosa (Xf), the causal bacterium of Pierce’s disease, and leaf scorch in almond and oleander. Acquisition and inoculation of Xf occur sometime during the process of stylet penetration into the plant. That process is most rigorously studied via electrical penetration graph (EPG) monitoring of insect feeding. This study provides part of the crucial biological meanings that define the waveforms of each new insect species recorded by EPG. By synchronizing AC EPG waveforms with high-magnification video of H. coagulata stylet penetration in artifical diet, we correlated stylet activities with three previously described EPG pathway waveforms, A1, B1 and B2, as well as one ingestion waveform, C. Waveform A1 occured at the beginning of stylet penetration. This waveform was correlated with salivary sheath trunk formation, repetitive stylet movements involving retraction of both maxillary stylets and one mandibular stylet, extension of the stylet fascicle, and the fluttering-like movements of the maxillary stylet tips.
    [Show full text]
  • Differences in the Sugar Composition of the Honeydew of Polyphagous
    NOTE Eur. J. Entomol. 108: 705–709, 2011 http://www.eje.cz/scripts/viewabstract.php?abstract=1671 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Differences in the sugar composition of the honeydew of polyphagous brown soft scale Coccus hesperidum (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea) feeding on various host plants KATARZYNA GOLAN 1 and AGNIESZKA NAJDA2 1Department of Entomology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, LeszczyĔskiego 7, 20-069 Lublin, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Vegetable and Medicinal Plants, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, LeszczyĔskiego 58, 20-068 Lublin, Poland Key words. Coccoidea, Coccus hesperidum, brown scale insects, honeydew, host plants, soft scale, sugar composition Abstract. Plant chemical composition is an important determinant of host plant-insect interactions. For many insects sugars are the main factors determining the acceptability of a plant. This study investigated changes in plant chemical composition and differences in sugar composition of different host plants induced by the feeding of Coccus hesperidum L. (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoi- dea). Present in plant extracts and honeydew there were three monosaccharide sugars: glucose, fructose and arabinose, and one disaccharide – sucrose. Arabinose was only found in extracts of Ficus benjamina plants. The sugar content of the honeydew was greater than in the extracts of control plants and lower than that in the extracts of infested plants. The honeydew collected from C. hesperidum feeding on the three plant species differed significantly in sugar content. Extracts of coccid infested plants of the three species used in this study contained more sugar than the un-infested control plants. The results show that honeydew composition of scale insects differ and the differences reflect the chemical composition of the host plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty-Five Pests You Don't Want in Your Garden
    Twenty-five Pests You Don’t Want in Your Garden Prepared by the PA IPM Program J. Kenneth Long, Jr. PA IPM Program Assistant (717) 772-5227 [email protected] Pest Pest Sheet Aphid 1 Asparagus Beetle 2 Bean Leaf Beetle 3 Cabbage Looper 4 Cabbage Maggot 5 Colorado Potato Beetle 6 Corn Earworm (Tomato Fruitworm) 7 Cutworm 8 Diamondback Moth 9 European Corn Borer 10 Flea Beetle 11 Imported Cabbageworm 12 Japanese Beetle 13 Mexican Bean Beetle 14 Northern Corn Rootworm 15 Potato Leafhopper 16 Slug 17 Spotted Cucumber Beetle (Southern Corn Rootworm) 18 Squash Bug 19 Squash Vine Borer 20 Stink Bug 21 Striped Cucumber Beetle 22 Tarnished Plant Bug 23 Tomato Hornworm 24 Wireworm 25 PA IPM Program Pest Sheet 1 Aphids Many species (Homoptera: Aphididae) (Origin: Native) Insect Description: 1 Adults: About /8” long; soft-bodied; light to dark green; may be winged or wingless. Cornicles, paired tubular structures on abdomen, are helpful in identification. Nymph: Daughters are born alive contain- ing partly formed daughters inside their bodies. (See life history below). Soybean Aphids Eggs: Laid in protected places only near the end of the growing season. Primary Host: Many vegetable crops. Life History: Females lay eggs near the end Damage: Adults and immatures suck sap from of the growing season in protected places on plants, reducing vigor and growth of plant. host plants. In spring, plump “stem Produce “honeydew” (sticky liquid) on which a mothers” emerge from these eggs, and give black fungus can grow. live birth to daughters, and theygive birth Management: Hide under leaves.
    [Show full text]
  • Melon Aphid Or Cotton Aphid, Aphis Gossypii Glover (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aphididae)1 John L
    EENY-173 Melon Aphid or Cotton Aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aphididae)1 John L. Capinera2 Distribution generation can be completed parthenogenetically in about seven days. Melon aphid occurs in tropical and temperate regions throughout the world except northernmost areas. In the In the south, and at least as far north as Arkansas, sexual United States, it is regularly a pest in the southeast and forms are not important. Females continue to produce southwest, but is occasionally damaging everywhere. Be- offspring without mating so long as weather allows feeding cause melon aphid sometimes overwinters in greenhouses, and growth. Unlike many aphid species, melon aphid is and may be introduced into the field with transplants in the not adversely affected by hot weather. Melon aphid can spring, it has potential to be damaging almost anywhere. complete its development and reproduce in as little as a week, so numerous generations are possible under suitable Life Cycle and Description environmental conditions. The life cycle differs greatly between north and south. In the north, female nymphs hatch from eggs in the spring on Egg the primary hosts. They may feed, mature, and reproduce When first deposited, the eggs are yellow, but they soon parthenogenetically (viviparously) on this host all summer, become shiny black in color. As noted previously, the eggs or they may produce winged females that disperse to normally are deposited on catalpa and rose of sharon. secondary hosts and form new colonies. The dispersants typically select new growth to feed upon, and may produce Nymph both winged (alate) and wingless (apterous) female The nymphs vary in color from tan to gray or green, and offspring.
    [Show full text]
  • Bushhopper Stalk-Eyed Fly Coconut Crab Periodical Cicada
    PIOTR NASKRECKI PHOTO BANNERS HANGING IN CHANGING EXHIBIT GALLERY Bushhopper Stalk-Eyed Fly Phymateus viridipes Diasemopsis fasciata Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique A nymph of the bushhopper from Mozambique Like antlers on a deer’s head, the long can afford to be slow and conspicuous thanks eyestalks on this fly’s head are used in maleto- to the toxins in its body. These insects feed male combat, allowing the individual with on plants rich in poisonous metabolites, the largest stalks to win access to females including some that can cause heart failure, so most predators avoid them. Coconut Crab Periodical Cicada Birgus latro Magicicada septendecim Guadalcanal, Solomon Islands Annandale, Virginia The coconut crab is not just another land Periodical cicadas spend seventeen years crab; it is the largest living terrestrial underground, feeding on the roots of plants. invertebrate, reaching a weight of nine After that time they all emerge at the same pounds and a leg span of over three feet. time, causing consternation in people and Their lifespan is equally impressive, and the a feeding frenzy in birds. A newly emerged largest individuals are believed to be forty to (eclosed) periodical cicada is almost snow sixty years old. white, but within a couple of hours its body darkens and the exoskeleton becomes hard. BIG BUGS • Dec. 31, 2015 - April 17, 2016 Virginia Living Museum • 524 J. Clyde Morris Blvd. • Newport News, VA 23601 • 757-595-1900 • thevlm.org PIOTR NASKRECKI PHOTO BANNERS HANGING IN CHANGING EXHIBIT GALLERY Dung Beetles Lappet Moth Kheper aegyptiorum Chrysopsyche lutulenta Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique Dung beetles are very important members of At the beginning of the dry season in Savanna communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Alfalfa Aphid and Leafhopper Management for the Low Deserts
    ALFALFA APHID AND LEAFHOPPER MANAGEMENT FOR THE LOW DESERTS Eric T. Natwick U.C. Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor, Imperial County, California APHIDS Spotted Alfalfa ~ The spotted alfalfa aphid (Therioaphis maculata) was introduced into New Mexico in 1953 and by 1954 had spread westward into California. This aphid is small pale yellow or grayish in color with 4 to 6 rows of black spots bearing small spines on its back. The adults mayor may not have wings. Spotted alfalfa aphid is smaller than blue alfalfa aphid or pea aphid arid will readily drop from plants when disturbed. The aphids are common on the underside of leaves where colonies start on the lower part of the plants, but also infest stems and leaves ~s colonies expand. These aphids produce great Quantities of honeydew. Severe infestations can develop on non-resistant varieties of alfalfa and reduce yield, stunt growth and even kill plants. Feed Quality and palatability are also reduced by sooty molds which grow on the honeydew excrement. In most desert growing areas introduction of resistant varieties (e.g., CUF101) along with the activity of predacious bugs, lady beetles, lacewings, syrphid fly larvae and introduced parasites has reduced this aphid to the status of a minor pest. If susceptible varieties are planted and beneficial insect populations are disrupted, then severe infestations can occur from late July through September. Because spotted alfalfa aphid has developed resistance to organophosphorus compounds, the best way to avoid aphid problems is the planting of a resistant variety. In fields where a susceptible variety is planted the field should be checked 2 to 3 times per week during July through September.
    [Show full text]
  • Aphids and Their Control on Orchids
    APHIDS AND THEIR CONTROL ON ORCHIDS Paul J. Johnson, Ph.D. Insect Research Collection, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007 Aphids are among the most obnoxious of orchid pests. These insects are global and orchid feeding species are problematic in tropical growing areas as well as in commercial and hobby greenhouses in temperate regions. Rabasse and Wyatt (1985) ranked aphids as one of three most serious greenhouse pests, along with spider mites and whiteflies. These pernicious insects can show themselves on orchids year-around in warm climates, but seem to be mostly autumn and winter problems in temperate regions. Like most other orchid pests the most common routes into plant collections is through either the acquisition of an infested plant or the movement of plants from outdoors to indoors. However, certain reproductive stages of pest species do fly and they will move to orchids from other plants quite readily. Because of their propensity for rapid reproduction any action against aphids should be completed quickly while their populations are still small. An aphid infestation is often detected by an accumulation of pale-tan colored “skins” that fall beneath the developing colony. These “skins” are the shed integument from the growing and molting immature aphids. All of the common pest species of aphid also secrete honeydew, a feeding by-product exuded by the aphid and composed of concentrated plant fluids, and is rich in carbohydrates. This honeydew drips and accumulates beneath the aphid colony. Because of the carbohydrates honeydew is attractive to ants, flies, bees, other insects including beneficial species, and sooty mold.
    [Show full text]
  • 080052-12.042.Pdf
    -0€ - wlvJFllaMurB o sqss otoqdI rPl)au Jopaal P tu!,tofua I laoo vlapoutals aoaaqlar!^at aqJ .?yaBrI uPuqro,lurf - olorld 'Funo^ rraql.rojarpl ol stJasutMaJ aql Jo I auosr ArMreaalpua, aq1:1r761taooqy I t4t'lvJFllaMlrr8 sqs8- oloqd 'ds d' I DuuollsoJalaaq lamat aq1 I a6odsnonatd I auo pue 'slapaaluoulpf, {lureur are sallaaqa^ou sta^oJ tur&paua oqslraql ol anp sallaaqueql sarrueaalrt alout '(apprull{qdEs {ool uPl qtrq^ ^lruil) sallaaqa^or puno] aq osleIIr^ apMpl dUaql Fuourelng paalpue ur a^rl ol sloa3?u^U loJ luauruolr^ualuallaJxa ue apr^ordsd?aq lsodtuoJ pala^olun 'pllorv\ pasutaql Jo stasodruo3ap aql roj slErqeqralJo ritlnu pu€sdpaq lsoduof, 'luauruorr^ua l?lnl?uaql ur palJ^lal a.rpralleu f,ru?Alopup lalllt JealsV dVSHJSOdWOC 3HJ 'punojaq upt sdnol? paUrssplJtot?u.I aWJo lsoru ;urluasardal 'ruaql ,pue spasur ulqlro\ pllo,{ Ietnlpu aql Jo rxsof,orlllxp luasaldalsuaplpa rno sleurueupup spllq ,qsq,salrldal 'sFurrup turpnl3ur Jo a8uelapu e loj sa^lasuaqlpooJ tulaq ol usrlrs?lpdpue uorleparduo{ 's.la,1oU uaa4aq uallodJo Uodsuprlaql ol aspasrpJo uorssrursupll aql uro{ 'a^rsualxaosle alp sruals{so)a s,lau€ldsrql ulrlll,rsllasurJo alor aqJ :tellaupue sa^Pal 'poo/r lupld ol poolqpu?.rrpq Ieurup uro{ ',ldn3ro[aq] splrqeqaql sepaue^ puPasra^rp se sr pooJtraqJ .s.ra^upup lsoruIaqI'?tlp4snvol a^rleualp sarf,ads ,,(Ure3aur^ uoruruot ,d€aq 'spuod'sueal}s aql lsoduoJ sa{el Josralp/vr qsarJ aq} s.pFo/{aqlJo arxos (eraldeurac lsaSPI eJoluauodruof, ? srlrnlJ Eur{map JI papeur a^€qpu?suasap lsaup aql ur a^rl rapro) sarir€a aql ar€{.req asool lo xan€urEuritplap
    [Show full text]
  • Arab Journal of Plant Protection
    Under the Patronage of H.E. the President of the Council of Ministers, Lebanon Arab Journal of Plant Protection Volume 27, Special Issue (Supplement), October 2009 Abstracts Book 10th Arab Congress of Plant Protection Organized by Arab Society for Plant Protection in Collaboration with National Council for Scientific Research Crowne Plaza Hotel, Beirut, Lebanon 26-30 October, 2009 Edited by Safaa Kumari, Bassam Bayaa, Khaled Makkouk, Ahmed El-Ahmed, Ahmed El-Heneidy, Majd Jamal, Ibrahim Jboory, Walid Abou-Gharbieh, Barakat Abu Irmaileh, Elia Choueiri, Linda Kfoury, Mustafa Haidar, Ahmed Dawabah, Adwan Shehab, Youssef Abu-Jawdeh Organizing Committee of the 10th Arab Congress of Plant Protection Mouin Hamze Chairman National Council for Scientific Research, Beirut, Lebanon Khaled Makkouk Secretary National Council for Scientific Research, Beirut, Lebanon Youssef Abu-Jawdeh Member Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon Leila Geagea Member Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Holy Spirit University- Kaslik, Lebanon Mustafa Haidar Member Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon Walid Saad Member Pollex sal, Beirut, Lebanon Samir El-Shami Member Ministry of Agriculture, Beirut, Lebanon Elia Choueiri Member Lebanese Agricultural Research Institute, Tal Amara, Zahle, Lebanon Linda Kfoury Member Faculty of Agriculture, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon Khalil Melki Member Unifert, Beirut, Lebanon Imad Nahal Member Ministry of Agriculture, Beirut,
    [Show full text]
  • Sucrose Triggers Honeydew Preference in the Ghost Ant, Tapinoma Melanocephalum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) A
    Sucrose triggers honeydew preference in the ghost ant, Tapinoma melanocephalum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) A. M. Zhou1, 2,*, B. Q. Kuang2, Y. R. Gao2, and G. W. Liang2 Abstract Honeydew produced by hemipterans mediates mutualistic interactions between ants and hemipterans. Previous studies demonstrated that the mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) produce abundant honeydew and attract a large number of tending ants. Ghost ants, Tapinoma melanocephalum (F.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), show a significant preference for mealybug honeydew over aphid honeydew. Although many studies have indicated that the honeydew produced by hemip- terans plays an important role in ant–hemipteran interactions, we know little about what triggers ants’ foraging preferences. Our results showed that the honeydew produced by both mealybugs and aphids contained fructose, sucrose, trehalose, melezitose, raffinose, and rhamnose. There were no significant difference in the concentrations of the various sugars between mealybugs and aphids, except sucrose. Xylose was present only in mealy- bug honeydew, and glucose was present only in aphid honeydew. We also found no substantial difference in the excretion frequency and the total weight of honeydew produced per 24 h between mealybugs and aphids. Ghost ants preferred sucrose. In addition, attractiveness of sucrose solutions increased significantly with increasing concentration. These results suggest that sucrose is the trigger for ghost ants’ honeydew preference. Key Words: ant–hemipteran mutualism; sugar composition; sugar concentration Resumen La mielcilla producida por hemípteros regula las interacciones mutualistas entre las hormigas y los hemípteros. Los estudios anteriores demostraron que la cochinilla harinosa Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) y el áfido Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) producen mielcilla abundante y atraen a un gran número de hormigas que atienden.
    [Show full text]