A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme TR010036 5.2 Annex A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Taunton Campus Travelling by Bus to College Information & Timetables
www.btc.ac.uk TAUNTON CAMPUS TRAVELLING BY BUS TO COLLEGE INFORMATION & TIMETABLES From September 2018 TRAVELLING BY BUS TO COLLEGE All buses providing routes to the Taunton campus are public service buses. Please note this timetable is not exclusive of all services that operate in and around Taunton, therefore for further and up to date information please visit www.traveline.info As such timetables and rules of carriage for public transport apply at all times. In addition to students from the College, fare paying members of the public will use the same buses. Like any other passenger, any student using a bus is required to have a valid ticket for each journey. WHICH PASS? 1. College students can chose to purchase a ticket and pay the driver for each journey or; 2. Make use of any special tickets issued by individual bus operators or; 3. Purchase the Somerset County Council County Ticket (Love the Bus). Careful research and planning is required to ensure the chosen ticket provides the best value for money for each individual student. This will depend on, for example, the number of journeys a student will make each week, location of work placement, availability of public transport at other times. The Somerset County Ticket allows unlimited use within Somerset from 1st September to 31st August, the pass needs to be ordered in advance to gain maximum value. Whilst it is possible to order a pass during term time, once term has started students will need to purchase a bus ticket for each journey while waiting for the pass application to be processed by Somerset County Council, this can take up to 2 weeks during busy times. -
Somerset's Common Works Programme 2015/16
Somerset's Common Works Programme 2015/16 - Q3 Progress The Common Works Programme shows the flood risk and water management works Somerset's Flood Risk Management Authorities are doing, funded from their own budgets. The last section, labelled joint, is for projects that are joint funded, including those that SRA funds are contributing to Flood Risk For removed For removed Project Management Timescale for schemes - schemes - Ref Project Name District Parish Description Flood Risk Source Progress Comments/Issues Stage Authority Implementation Reason for Further (Funder) removal Action 1. Improvement Schemes - Environment Agency Joint Programme of Work attracting either Government Grant in Aid or Local Levy (WRFCC) funding (see map for EA schemes) www.somersetriversauthority.org.uk/about-us/board-and-partners/board-meetings-and-papers/?entryid108=97703 Carry out repairs to defence wall and reinstate flood bank to Initial site visit has taken place. EA 1 Brue Glastonbury to Cripps Mendip Wedmore Design EA Main River 2015-16 defence level G = on course for delivery in 15/16 Works are ongoing Picked up on IDB Enhanced EA 1 Brue Glastonbury to Cripps Mendip Wedmore Desilt and pull banks on River Brue EA Main River 2015-16 R = no longer proposed for delivery in 15/16 by maintenance EA programme None Lewis Drove Tilting Weir - Gate major mechanical maintenance, This work is being carried out by EA 2 North Drain Mendip Burtle EA Main River 2015-16 repair motor and gearbox G = on course for delivery in 15/16 MEICA Funding for EA 3 Burnham - Highbridge -
JOINT AREA COMMITTEES in SOUTH SOMERSET Officer Report on Planning Application: 09/01766/FUL
JAE JOINT AREA COMMITTEES IN SOUTH SOMERSET Officer Report On Planning Application: 09/01766/FUL Proposal : The erection of a temporary agricultural dwelling for equestrian and agricultural purposes (GR 360644/127291) Site Address: Land OS 8041 Sparkford Road Sparkford Parish: Sparkford CAMELOT Ward (SSDC Mr M. Lewis (Cllr) Member) Division (SCC Member) Mr B Little (Cllr) Recommending Case Nicholas Head Officer: Tel: (01935) 462167 Email: [email protected] Target date : 10th July 2009 Applicant : Mr William G M Turner Agent: Bill Lowe Ltd (no agent if blank) 43 Alexandra Road Frome Somerset BA11 1LX Application Type : Minor Dwellings 1-9 site less than 1ha Background and Reason for Referral to Committee The proposal is referred to the Committee at the request of the Ward Member for reasons of public interest, and in the light of the objection raised by the Parish Council. The request has been agreed by the Vice-chairman, as the Chairman is the Ward Member. Members will recall that this application was previously considered by the Committee on 11 November 2009, and that the matter was deferred in order to allow clarification to be sought on the nature of the business and whether or not the agricultural consultant is supportive of the scheme. Further Information Requested The applicant's agent has supplied the following details setting out the exact nature of the business under consideration in this application, attached as Annex A to this report. Appended to the report as Annex B is a letter from Peter J Williams, of Reading Agricultural Consultants, confirming that it is his assessment of the application that a temporary dwelling for a period of three years is warranted (as measured against the criteria set out in Annex A to PPS7). -
6Th Feb 2019
Yeovil Town RRC Committee Meeting Minutes Location: St John’s Ambulance, St John’s House, Memorial Road, Houndstone Business Park, Yeovil BA22 8WA Date: 6th Feb 2019 Time: 18:30 Attendees: Steve Warren, Phil MacQuaid, Denise Byrd, Mel Dodge, Anita Rufus, June Moule, Lynne Thumpston, Lesley Nesbitt, Adam Hawkins, Guy Williams Tim Hawkins, Simon Rowbottom, John Curtis, Louise Ward, Fez Parker, Daniel McFarlane Agenda items 1. Apologies for absence – Malcolm Maxted, Catherine Thompson, Lindsay Saunders 2. Minutes of last meeting These were accepted as a true and accurate record. Matters Arising Draft Role Descriptions The Chairman has proposed that all draft descriptions and any other relevant material should be forwarded to him as soon as possible so that they can be finalized by a small sub-committee who will hopefully, have them on the website by early April ready to be presented at the AGM in May. The date of the Annual Awards Night for 2019 is 29th November. This was omitted from the January meeting minutes. The Commodore at RNAS Yeovilton has given permission for our events there to go ahead. Our MOD License expires in March and the renewal requires an up to date Risk Assessment, EA Race License, and a copy of UKA Insurance documents. 3. Officer’s reports: Vice Chairman: Steve Warren Took the opportunity to thank Nathan Gardiner &Graham Still for their training efforts for club members Thanked everyone who attended Pete Jakeman’s funeral. Secretary/Data Officer: Catherine Thompson (absent) Due to other commitments Catherine has tendered her resignation forthwith. We thank her for all the hard work she has done as Club Secretary and especially with GDPR. -
Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme in This Edition Newsletter – Summer 2019
If you need help accessing this or any other Highways England information, please call 0300 123 5000 and we will help you. A303 Sparkford to Ilchester dualling scheme In this edition Newsletter – summer 2019 Project update Scheme timeline Ecology surveys Highways England motorway campaign Corridor update Welcome to the A303 Sparkford to Ilchester dualling scheme newsletter. This provides a project update, information about ongoing work and detail about the A303/A358 corridor. Project update Since we last provided an update in the winter 2018 newsletter, the A303 Sparkford to Ilchester dualling scheme has been progressing through the Examination period of the Development Consent Order (DCO) process. This is the planning process required for the scheme, where the DCO application must be approved before the scheme construction can commence. On 12 June 2019 the DCO Examination for the A303 Sparkford to Ilchester dualling scheme closed. The next step in the DCO process will be for the Planning Inspectorate to write a report about the Examination for the Secretary of State for Transport. This report will include a recommendation on whether to refuse or grant the DCO. The report from the Planning Inspectorate will be issued to the Secretary of State for Transport by the end of September 2019. A three-month period will then commence enabling the Secretary of State to decide whether to grant or refuse the DCO. This means a decision should be announced by the end of 2019. The decision will be published alongside the Planning Inspectorate report on the National Infrastructure Planning website. If you would like any more information on the DCO process the project is going through please visit the National Infrastructure Planning website 1 Scheme timeline The timeline below shows the key milestones for the project and the next steps for the scheme now the Examination has closed. -
Somerset Parish Map CC
Shipham Norton St. TellisfordPhilip Brean Compton Lympsham Bishop Stome Rode Priddy Litton Hemington Axbridge Easton Badgworth Cheddar Berrow Brent East Kilmersdon Lullington Brent Beckington Knoll Weare Chewton Mendip Buckland Dinham Burnham-on-Sea Chilcompton Chapel Coleford Great Berkley Allerton Holcombe Elm EmboroughBinegar Stratton on the Fosse Mells Burnham Rodney Stoke without Minehead without Ashwick Leigh Westbury -on- Frome Stoke Mendip Selworthy Mark Wedmore St Michael Whately West Wookey Wells Downhead Nunney Oare Porlock Huntspill Selwood MINEHEAD East Huntspill Trudoxhill Crosscombe Shepton Doulting Stringston Stogursey Godney St. Cuthberts Out Mallet Cranmore Burtle Wanstrow Wootton East Kilve Pawlett Woolavington Quantoxhead Otterhampton Luccombe Courtenay Dunster Watchet Stockland Bristol Puriton Meare North Wootton Carhampton Old Williton Pilton Cleeve West Fiddington Witham Friary Cossington Timberscombe Quantoxhead Nether Cannington Batcombe Withycombe Holford Stowey Bawdrip Chilton Polden Edington Bridgwater without West Pylle Samford Brett Chitton Catcott Shapwick Glastonbury Evercreech Exmoor Cutcombe Trinity Pennard Upton Noble Exford Bicknoller Sharpham Wembdon East Luxborough Over Stawell Pennard Milton Clevedon Monksilver Stowey Chedzoy West Bradley Nethercombe Spaxton Durleigh Bridgwater Ashcott Street Stogumber Crowcombe Moorlinch Brewham Treborough Baltonsborough Ditcheat Lamyatt Bruton Enmore Walton Bagborough Greinton West West Winsford Goathurst Westonzoyland Butleigh Exton Elworthy Bradley Withypool -
Minutes of Parish Council (PC) Meeting Held As a Consultative Virtual Meeting Via Zoom Software on Wednesday 28Th October 2020 at 7.00Pm
North Cadbury & Yarlington Parish Council Clerk: Mrs Rebecca Carter, Portman House, North Barrow, Somerset, BA22 7LZ Tel: 01963 240226 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.northcadbury.org.uk “Draft” Minutes of Parish Council (PC) Meeting held as a consultative virtual meeting via Zoom software on Wednesday 28th October 2020 at 7.00pm Councillors Present (remotely): Malcolm Hunt (Chairman) Alan Bartlett (Vice Chairman) Sue Gilbert Karen Harris Roger House Andy Keys-Toyer Bryan Mead Archie Montgomery Alan Rickers John Rundle Katherine Vaughan In Attendance (remotely): C.Cllr M Lewis, D.Cllr H Hobhouse, D.Cllr Kevin Messenger, the Clerk, Mr A Tregay, Boon Brown and nineteen members of the public. Public Session There were no comments from the public. Clare Field, Ridgeway Lane, North Cadbury – Presentation of Initial Plans for Development Presentation by Mr A Tregay, Boon Brown to PC of initial conceptual plans on scheme at Ridgeway Lane prior to formal consultation with PC, neighbours/residents. The Chairman informed residents that the presentation by Mr Tregay would not constitute a formal consultation. Mr Tregay had given his assurance to the Chairman that the PC and neighbours/residents would have the opportunity to comment and ask questions during the formal consultation process at pre- application and post-application stages, which would be held at a later date, which was also confirmed by Mr Tregay. Mr Tregay stated that this was the start of a constructive dialogue with the PC in order to give an indication of the proposed development during the early stages and to hopefully receive feedback. The aim was to keep the PC and neighbours informed as much as possible. -
A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme TR010036 5.15 Annex N: Tables Evidencing Regard Had to Consultation Responses
A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme .0 5 TR010036 5.15 Annex N: Tables Evidencing Regard had to Consultation Responses Volume APFP Regulation 5(2)(q) Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 July 2018 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Consultation Report Annex N Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Development Consent Order 201[x] ANNEX N: Tables Evidencing Regard had to Consultation Responses Regulation Number: Regulation 5(2)(q) Planning Inspectorate Scheme TR010036 Reference Application Document Reference 5.15 Author: A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme, Project Team, Highways England Version Date Status of Version Rev 0 July 2018 Application Issue Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010036 Application Document Ref: TR010036/APP/5.15 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester dualling scheme Consultation Report ANNEX N: Tables evidencing regard had to consultation responses (in accordance with s49 of the Planning Act 2008) Tables evidencing regard had to consultation responses (in accordance with s49 of the Planning Act 2008) The tables provided below evidence the regard had to responses received to Highways England’s statutory consultation in accordance with s49 of PA 2008. Each table summarises responses received, sets out whether a change has been made in response to it, and details Highways England’s response, including the regard had to the consultation response. It should be noted that where multiple responses containing the same comment have been received, these are addressed at the same time in tables below. A separate table is included for each individual strand of statutory consultation (s42(a), s42(b), s42(d) and s47 and s48) as presented below. -
North Cadbury Neighbourhood Plan Heritage Assessment on Behalf of North Cadbury and Yarlington Parish Council August 2020
North Cadbury Neighbourhood Plan Heritage Assessment on behalf of North Cadbury and Yarlington Parish Council August 2020 kim sankey │ architect angel architecture │ design │ interiors Angel Architecture Ltd Registered in England at Unit 4, Herringston Barn, Herringston, Dorchester, Dorset DT2 9PU _____________________________________________________________________ North Cadbury Neighbourhood Plan Heritage Assessment August 2020 NORTH CADBURY Key Features The special interest of North Cadbury lies in its origins as a rural estate village (formerly Cadbury Estate) of mixed farmland demarked by ancient enclosed hedgerows with some C17 and C18 modification. On the edges are C19 historic orchards, bounded by mature hedgerows, and several farmsteads. The orchards are a particularly strong landscape feature in terms of social history and culture as they represented an intensively productive use of land, providing cider for the labouring classes while also allowing the grazing of sheep and poultry. There are many listed buildings but most prominent are the Church and Cadbury Court at the historic core around which development is concentrated. The southern edge of the Conservation Area is characterised by the parkland setting of the Court. Under the ownership of Sir Archibald & Lady Langman the estate introduced scientific methods of farming in the 1930’s. The Langman’s prosperity, as a result of this innovation, is evident in the provision of the new village hall opposite Glebe House on Woolston Road. Although most of the other farms have been converted to residential use, Manor Farm remains the manufacturing base for renowned Montgomery Cheddar and Ogleshield cheeses. The River Cam, which rises in Yarlington, runs along the western edge of North Cadbury and through Brookhampton. -
Long, W, Dedications of the Somersetshire Churches, Vol 17
116 TWENTY-THIKD ANNUAL MEETING. (l[ki[rk^. BY W, LONG, ESQ. ELIEVING that a Classified List of the Dedications jl:> of the Somersetshire Churches would be interesting and useful to the members of the Society, I have arranged them under the names of the several Patron Saints as given by Ecton in his “ Thesaurus Kerum Ecclesiasticarum,^^ 1742 Aldhelm, St. Broadway, Douiting. All Saints Alford, Ashcot, Asholt, Ashton Long, Camel West, Castle Cary, Chipstaple, Closworth, Corston, Curry Mallet, Downhead, Dulverton, Dun- kerton, Farmborough, Hinton Blewitt, Huntspill, He Brewers, Kingsdon, King Weston, Kingston Pitney in Yeovil, Kingston] Seymour, Langport, Martock, Merriot, Monksilver, Nine- head Flory, Norton Fitzwarren, Nunney, Pennard East, PoLntington, Selworthy, Telsford, Weston near Bath, Wolley, Wotton Courtney, Wraxhall, Wrington. DEDICATION OF THE SOMERSET CHURCHES. 117 Andrew, St. Aller, Almsford, Backwell, Banwell, Blagdon, Brimpton, Burnham, Ched- dar, Chewstoke, Cleeve Old, Cleve- don, Compton Dundon, Congresbury, Corton Dinham, Curry Rivel, Dowlish Wake, High Ham, Holcombe, Loxton, Mells, Northover, Stoke Courcy, Stoke under Hambdon, Thorn Coffin, Trent, Wells Cathedral, White Staunton, Withypool, Wiveliscombe. Andrew, St. and St. Mary Pitminster. Augustine, St. Clutton, Locking, Monkton West. Barnabas, St. Queen’s Camel. Bartholomew, St. Cranmore West, Ling, Ubley, Yeovilton. Bridget, St. Brean, Chelvy. Catherine, St. Drayton, Montacute, Swell. Christopher, St. Lympsham. CONGAR, St. Badgworth. Culborne, St. Culbone. David, St. Barton St. David. Dennis, St. Stock Dennis. Dubritius, St. Porlock. Dun STAN, St. Baltonsbury. Edward, St. Goathurst. Etheldred, St. Quantoxhead West. George, St. Beckington, Dunster, Easton in Gordano, Hinton St. George, Sand- ford Bret, Wembdon, Whatley. Giles, St. Bradford, Cleeve Old Chapel, Knowle St. Giles, Thurloxton. -
Scoping Report and Project Plan
North Cadbury and Yarlington Neighbourhood Plan Initial Scoping Report and Project Plan SCOPING REPORT – INITIAL FILE NOTE Prepared on behalf of North Cadbury and Yarlington Parish Council SEPTEMBER 2019 1. INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared by Jo Witherden BSc(Hons) DipTP DipUD MRTPI of Dorset Planning Consultant Ltd, for North Cadbury and Yarlington Parish Council. The Parish Council is the qualifying body authorised to act in preparing a neighbourhood development plan in relation to the North Cadbury and Yarlington Neighbourhood Plan area. The purpose of this report is to identify at an early stage what issues that relate to development are likely to be most important to the community, and are something that the Neighbourhood Plan can potentially influence. This will then guide the early stages of evidence gathering and consultation, and initial project plan, to ensure that the time and resources spent on preparing the Neighbourhood Plan are focused on achieving the desired outcomes. NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANS A Neighbourhood Plan, when made, becomes part of the development plan for the area, alongside the Local Plan. Together they set out the policies that are used to decide what types of building work or other development will generally be allowed, and what should be refused. They can also say what buildings or places should be protected, and why. Having a Neighbourhood Plan won’t change the area overnight. Its key influence is on decisions made by on planning applications. Landowners (or developers) will still need to make planning applications to the District Council, who will consult on these before making a decision to permit or refuse the proposed development. -
Dear Secretary of State for Transport, A303 CONSULTATION
From: To: A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Cc: [email protected] Subject: A303 Consultation Ilchester to Sparkford Date: 01 September 2020 20:25:34 Dear Secretary of State for Transport, A303 CONSULTATION – ILCHESTER/PODIMORE TO SPARKFORD We live in the village of West Camel immediately south of the section under consideration for upgrade. Having lived in the village for over 30 years we have been involved in previous consultations and do appreciate all the complexities. The initial advice given locally for this consultation was that as Option 2 appeared to be such an obvious choice that is was – “a no brainer” because: It is cheaper, quicker to build and safer as requires little in the way of entrance and exits…..so why would anyone looking at the options choose Option 1 ? Unfortunately the consultation process allowed for votes worldwide and it appeared a successful Facebook campaign from the smaller community north of the A303 called in votes from as far away as Australia to “Save our Vale”, not realising that almost as much ‘new land’ would be carved up to dual along the (broadly) existing route for Option 1 but causing abject misery and chaos for the whole build, particularly past the new primary school in Queen Camel, which Highways England didn’t initially know had been recently built. Option 1 appears to be the only section of the A303 not bypassing local communities. Ilminster, Wincanton, Sparkford and Mere to name just a few. Over time we have raised a number of concerns about process with those running the consultation –it appears that the planners can flex the area they consider as ‘local’ and in this case, they chose to flex the local boundary to as far away as 7 miles from the planned route.