<<

SEPTEMBER 2012 | Vol. 35 | No. 9

You Can Take It to the Bank: The Role of Banking in Dealing with Distressed by Sorell E. Negro Sorell E. Negro is a lawyer in Robinson & Cole LLP’s Hartford, CT office, where she prac- tices , , and environmental law. She has a B.S. from Georgetown University, cum laude, and a J.D. from Cornell Law School, magna cum laude. Prior to joining Robinson & Cole, she was a law clerk to the Hon. Fernando M. Olguin, U.S. Magistrate Judge for the Central District of California.

I. The Housing Crisis them, including clean-up, , and polic- ing costs, are also significant.3 Furthermore, va- The mortgage crisis, followed by the Great cant and abandoned properties deter people from Recession, has resulted in widespread vacant, moving into or investing in a neighborhood. abandoned, and foreclosed properties through- There are a variety of ways to respond to dis- out the United States, a severe issue affecting both tressed properties and the housing crisis.4 Land residential and commercial properties. Over 14.2 banks have helped communities deal with serious, million year-round housing units were vacant in systemic problems of abandoned or foreclosed 2010, a 3.8 million increase from 2000.1 Not only properties, where market demand has failed to are vacant and abandoned properties eyesores, remedy the problem. This can occur when the but they negatively impact their communities by properties cost more to purchase and rehabilitate decreasing the value of surrounding , re- than they would be worth, for example. Thus, ducing tax revenue due to lower property values market forces of supply and demand alone would and delinquent taxes, and making neighborhoods not result in putting the property back to use. This less safe.2 The costs to to maintain article explains what land banks are, provides ex-

41176986 SEPTEMBER 2012 | Vol. 35 | No. 9 and Planning Law Report

amples of prominent land banks, and discusses how they can be effective.

II. 101

You Can Take It to the Bank: The Role of Land A. What It Is Banking in Dealing with Distressed Properties...... 1 Land banks are governmental, quasi-govern- I. The Housing Crisis ...... 1 mental, or nonprofit entities that acquire dis- II. Land Banking 101...... 2 tressed properties and then hold and manage III. Land Banks in Action ...... 3 them for future use or resale. They typically ac- IV. Concerns?...... 8 quire properties through tax , mort- V. Conclusions...... 9 gage foreclosure, market transfers, and dona- tions. They maintain properties and rehabilitate them through improvements, redevelopment, or demolition. A land bank is distinguishable from a land trust, generally a nonprofit organization that holds title to property indefinitely to ensure that it is used for a community purpose, such as preservation or affordable housing. Afford- able housing land trusts own the land while oc- cupants own or rent the structures. Land banks Editorial Director are different in that they repurpose and transfer Michael F. Alberti, Esq. Contributing Editors properties, throughout a wider geographic area, Patricia E. Salkin, Esq. to third parties.5 Publishing Specialist Robert Schantz Land banks first developed in St. Louis and Electronic Composition Ohio in the 1970s, followed by Atlanta and Specialty Composition/Rochester Desktop Publishing Louisville over a decade later, to deal with aban-

Zoning and Planning Law Report (USPS# pending) is issued monthly, ex- doned properties in tax foreclosure. While these cept in August, 11 times per year; published and copyrighted by Thomson rudimentary land banks dealt with repurpos- Reuters, 610 Opperman Drive, P.O. Box 64526, St. Paul, MN 55164-0526. Application to mail at Periodical rate is pending at St. Paul, MN. ing some properties, they lacked the capacity POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Zoning and Planning Law Report, to effectively deal with the systemic problem 610 Opperman Drive, P.O. Box 64526, St. Paul MN 55164-0526. of abandoned properties that each city faced.6 © 2012 Thomson Reuters Funding was lacking, and the tax foreclosure ISSN 0161-8113 Editorial Offices: 50 Broad Street East, Rochester, NY 14694 laws were not amended to allow the land banks Tel.: 585-546-5530 Fax: 585-258-3774 to efficiently acquire title and to make the prop- Customer Service: 610 Opperman Drive, Eagan, MN 55123 7 Tel.: 800-328-4880 Fax: 612-340-9378 erties marketable. Successful modern land banks, described below, came about after states This publication was created to provide you with accurate and authoritative information concerning the subject matter covered; however, this publication was not necessarily prepared by persons licensed streamlined tax foreclosure processes and gave to practice law in a particular jurisdiction. The publisher is not engaged in rendering legal or other professional advice and this publication is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. If you require land banks greater power. Modern land banks legal or other expert advice, you should seek the services of a competent attorney or other professional. can be more complex and play a greater role in land assembly and redevelopment.

2 © 2012 Thomson Reuters Zoning and Planning Law Report SEPTEMBER 2012 | Vol. 35 | No. 9

B. How It Works munity, reason for vacancy or abandonment, condition, and environmental contamination— There are many different organizational struc- to determine potential re-uses.11 tures of land banks. Municipalities are creatures States can enable and promote land banking of the state and, thus, their authority is granted by streamlining and shortening foreclosure pro- to them from state constitutions and enabling cesses and by authorizing funding mechanisms, statutes, including the authority to create land such as authorizing issuance of tax-free bonds banks. Some states have statutes that expressly or tax-increment financing (TIF). States can also authorize municipalities to create land banks authorize mechanisms by which local govern- and enable intergovernmental cooperation for ments can acquire, maintain, and transfer aban- regional goals such as redevelopment and af- doned properties, such as allowing land banks fordable housing, such as ’s Land Bank to waive back taxes or sell properties at below Enabling Law. market value, emphasizing community develop- Although enabling legislation is generally ment over profit. States may also provide fund- needed, in certain states municipalities may ing and tax incentives for land banks. have the authority to develop a land banking In the wake of the housing crisis, the fed- scheme without express statutory authority, eral government recognized land banks as a vi- such as through powers. A able tool. The Housing and Economic Recov- redevelopment authority or municipal housing ery Act of 2008 provided $4 billion to states development department may perform similar and local governments that could be used to functions as land banks, but their authority to establish land banks and to purchase and re- acquire and dispose of property is more limited habilitee properties in mortgage foreclosure.12 and their approach is often confined to a spe- These funds were part of the Neighborhood cific district or area.8 Stabilization Program (“NSP”), which was fur- Generally, following the state enabling stat- ther funded by $1 billion through the American ute, local governments adopt an ordinance to Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.13 The create a land bank authority. Land banks are Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer often nonprofit organizations or government Protection Act of 2010 gave another $1 billion entities that are run by a board of directors. to states and local governments with neighbor- Sometimes the board is elected; in other cases, hoods facing the highest rates of foreclosure it is appointed by the local government. They and subprime mortgages.14 acquire property through tax , mortgage foreclosures, intergovernmental As towns and cities throughout the country transfers, and market transfers. Once the prop- have differing needs and goals, land banks vary erty is acquired, depending on the enabling in their powers and functions. Some have been statute, land banks may have the authority to more successful at rehabilitating properties waive back taxes and clear titles. They rehabili- than others. tate the property—through improvements, re- development, or demolition—or maintain it for III. Land Banks in Action future use or resale.9 Land banks also maintain the properties and may demolish properties in A. Genesee County, MI appropriate circumstances.10 Land banks gen- erally look at the property’s characteristics— Michigan enables local jurisdictions to create including geography, relationship to the com- land bank authorities with broad powers and

© 2012 Thomson Reuters 3 SEPTEMBER 2012 | Vol. 35 | No. 9 Zoning and Planning Law Report

provides tax breaks to land banks to encourage mechanisms including borrowing, issuing tax- land banking. The Genesee County Land Reuti- exempt bonds or notes, TIF for brownfields and lization Council was created in 2002 through an demolition, receiving the interest and penalties inter-local agreement between the county and on delinquent tax liens, and receiving half of the Flint, and it became the Genesee County Land property taxes collected for the first five years Bank Authority (“GCLBA”) in 2004. This land after properties are transferred.24 Property of bank became a remarkable success and a model land banks in Michigan and their income are for other communities seeking to set up land exempt from all taxes and special assessments banks in response to the mortgage crisis and of the state and local governments.25 the Great Recession. Between 2004 and 2009, The GCLBA acquires most of its inventory 15 it repurposed 1,500 properties. According to through tax foreclosure. It may bid on foreclosed Dan Kildee, Founder of GCLBA and Co-Found- properties at public auctions, and any foreclosed er and President of the Center for Community property that is not sold at the auction automat- Progress, “organizing the land bank at the coun- ically transfers to the land bank.26 The GCBLA ty level creates the opportunity to utilize a more may also purchase private property, which it diverse inventory of real estate and to have re- may do if needed for planned development or gional cross-subsidy.” a public purpose, and may receive properties as Michigan’s Delinquent Fore- gifts.27 The GCLBA then demolishes, rehabili- closure Act of 1999 paved the way for the suc- tates, rents, or sells the properties.28 It receives 16 cessful land bank. This Act authorized coun- half of the property taxes that are collected on ties to acquire properties in bulk through tax the properties for the first five years after they foreclosure and to create a fund from the sale are transferred.29 It has complete authority to of the properties to manage their inventory.17 It determine the conditions under which it trans- stopped the practice of selling tax liens to pri- fers its property, including setting prices.30 This vate third parties, who had little incentive to put flexibility has allowed the GCLBA to set condi- properties back to use,18 and streamlined the tions and a sales price that are appropriate to foreclosure process by allowing a county to pull the demand of a given property. together all of its tax-delinquent properties into one foreclosure proceeding.19 The law reduced In addition, the GCLBA has a “side lot” pro- the foreclosure timeline to less than 3 years, gram where vacant properties are transferred to 31 down from 4-7 years.20 adjacent property owners for $1. It also per- In 2003, Michigan passed the progressive mits neighbors to use its vacant lots for com- Land Bank Fast Track Act, giving land banks munity gardens. These creative mechanisms ef- the authority to acquire all tax foreclosed prop- ficiently and affordably put property back to use 32 erties and quiet title, and establishing a state and maintain neighborhood property values. It land bank—the Michigan Land Bank Fast Track also pays neighborhood organizations to main- Authority.21 A county or qualified city may cre- tain its properties and works with both for-prof- 33 ate a land bank through an intergovernmental it and non-profit organizations. The GCLBA agreement with the state land bank.22 In stream- emphasizes working with residents as well as lining the tax foreclosure process, if taxes are the private sector in revitalizing communities. not paid after a hearing on tax delinquency, the Despite its lauded track record and hefty bur- property is soon transferred to the local govern- den of maintaining thousands of properties, ment, which can then transfer it to a land bank.23 GCLBA’s budget was recently cut by $1.3 mil- Michigan land banks have a variety of funding lion.34 Further, the city of Flint saw record fore-

4 © 2012 Thomson Reuters Zoning and Planning Law Report SEPTEMBER 2012 | Vol. 35 | No. 9

closures in 2011. Making matters more difficult, developing, or demolishing properties, and pri- the city of Flint saw record foreclosures in 2011, oritizing the disposition of properties.38 35 many of which will revert to GCLBA. In ad- In just over a year, CCLRC acquired 495 dition, TIF bonds were issued in 2005-2007 to properties, demolished 167 properties, and finance brownfields projects with the expecta- transferred 80 properties to cities or redevel- tion that the redevelopment would increase the opers.39 After CCLRC’s trial period, Ohio en- property values by 3% per year. As Doug Wei- acted a statewide land banking enabling statute land, Executive Director of GCLBA, explained, in 2010.40 CCLRC has become extraordinarily the subsequent mortgage crisis dashed these successful at acquiring and repurposing proper- projections. Consequently, GCLBA must use ties, now acquiring approximately 100 proper- some of the tax revenue on properties it sells to ties per month,41 and is a model for other com- pay down the bonds, although that money was munities throughout the country. intended to help finance GCLBA’s operations and property maintenance. “Brownfield TIF Like Michigan, leading up to the creation of is a useful tool,” Weiland said, “but its use in CCLRC, Ohio passed legislation that enabled the economic climate that came on its heels has CCLRC to be the highly effective land bank that changed the financial dynamics considerably.” it has become. Ohio streamlined and shortened According to Weiland, certain aspects of the state’s tax foreclosure proceedings, allowing Michigan’s enabling legislation must be amend- foreclosure of vacant or abandoned properties ed to address funding. “Currently, there is a $15 (not occupied) to proceed through an adminis- fee upon delinquency and a $175 fee upon for- trative hearing rather than requiring a less ef- feiture,” he said. “Splitting the fees and charging ficient judicial proceeding.42 In addition, any in- half at delinquency and half at forfeiture would terest in a property is extinguished upon transfer produce a substantially higher level of funds to the land bank from tax foreclosure.43 as there are about 3 times as many properties Importantly, Ohio created a scheme whereby that go delinquent.” An amendment should also the land bank is a private nonprofit corporation, clarify that these payments are strictly under the enjoying general corporate powers, but it also county treasurer’s control for use by the land has key public powers.44 Thus, CCLRC has the bank in maintaining properties. power to acquire, manage, , and transfer property; enforce codes and abate nuisances; B. Cuyahoga County, OH abate taxes and clear title; issue bonds; and con- 45 Cuyahoga County, in northeast Ohio, was tract, borrow, and lend. Gus Frangos, Presi- among the earliest and hardest hit in the fore- dent and General Counsel of CCLRC, explained closure crisis, facing approximately 13,000- that these powers distinguish CCLRC from a 15,000 foreclosures per year since 2005.36 The common municipal land bank, which is typical- Cuyahoga County Land Reutilization Corpo- ly “very passive.” According to Frangos, such ration (“CCLRC”) was established in 2009 as municipal land banks function as “a repository a nonprofit community corporation, following of last resort,” and they lack the corporate-like GCLBA as a model and upon legislation specifi- powers to transact and borrow money, for ex- cally authorizing a land bank in that county.37 ample, that CCLRC enjoys. If the land bank had CCLRC has entered into over a dozen Memo- to go through administrative review and multi- randa of Understanding with different munici- ple governmental approvals, “we would get one palities, setting forth means of maintaining, property done every month,” he stated.

© 2012 Thomson Reuters 5 SEPTEMBER 2012 | Vol. 35 | No. 9 Zoning and Planning Law Report

The final ingredient to CCLRC’s lauded suc- nered with the International Services Center to cess is its reliable and significant funding stream, match vacant homes with refugees who will fix which is approximately $7 million per year.46 them up to earn equity.53 CCLRC is primarily financed through the pay- According to Frangos, CCLRC is very well ment of interest and penalties on delinquent regarded in the community. “We send a demoli- property taxes and assessments.47 This reliable tion crew to a home that has been trashed, and funding stream is unique. While other land the neighbors come out and start cheering,” banks may have to rely on money from govern- Frangos stated, “and the moment you take it mental entities, whose budgets are consistently down, the neighbors’ property values immedi- strapped, CCLRC can count on its funding ately go up.” and can therefore plan and effectively operate. Kildee (who also helped establish CCLRC) and C. Fulton County, GA others support a similar, clear funding mecha- nism in Michigan so that fees assessed on de- The Fulton County/Atlanta Land Bank Au- linquent taxpayers pay for managing properties thority (“FCALBA”) is one of the oldest land that go through tax foreclosure, and “taxpayers banks. It was established in 1991 following that pay on time are not penalized by the tax Georgia’s 1990 enabling statute, which autho- foreclosure process.” rized one or more cities and the county contain- Most of CCLRC’s properties come from Fan- ing such cities to form a land bank authority by nie Mae, HUD and major lenders.48 It distinc- entering into an interlocal cooperation agree- tively has bulk agreements whereby ment.54 The state authorized land banks to ac- transfers distressed properties to CCLRC at quire and maintain tax delinquent properties, $3,500 each, and HUD sells it properties worth clear title, and transfer the properties. Georgia’s $20,000 or less for $100.49 CCLRC also has land banks are public corporate entities gov- agreements with Wells Fargo and Bank of Amer- erned by a board consisting of two members ica whereby the banks sell it foreclosed prop- for each city, appointed by each mayor, and two erties for $7,500 to avoid significant judicial members appointed by the county commission.55 and maintenance costs.50 These groundbreak- Georgia’s land banks are empowered to extin- ing agreements prevent the properties from be- guish all county and city taxes on a property, in- ing sold to speculators who have no interest in cluding school district taxes, when the property repurposing or maintaining the property in the is transferred.56 Moreover, the land banks have community’s interest.51 full discretion in determining the sales price and CCLRC continues to be forward-thinking as it may foreclose the right of redemption to prop- 57 considers how to deal with its inventory. It keeps erty acquired through a tax sale. They must track of, and maintains, its inventory through a maintain a publicly available inventory of their detailed property profile system, which tracks properties and classify them based on suitability the property from the time it is first inspected for use.58 until the land bank disposes of it.52 This allows FCALBA was established in 1991 as a non- the land bank to effectively manage its wide va- profit corporation and quasi-governmental en- riety of properties. The up-to-date property pro- tity,59 and it prioritizes transferring properties to files include pictures and maintenance informa- neighborhood nonprofit organizations or other tion such as when the grass was cut. CCLRC entities to develop affordable housing.60 Its is also open to nonconventional ways of repur- funding largely comes from local governments posing properties. For example, it recently part- and philanthropic entities with significant pro-

6 © 2012 Thomson Reuters Zoning and Planning Law Report SEPTEMBER 2012 | Vol. 35 | No. 9

grammatic funds from the federal government’s weekly asking if FCALBA can take over their NSP program.61 The NSP money is directed to- properties because they cannot afford the tax- ward the properties, however, and not the land es or maintenance. According to Norman, op- bank’s costs of operations and maintenance.62 erational constraints are more acute given the FCALBA does not automatically receive title severity of the foreclosure crisis, and FCALBA to properties that are not sold at a tax fore- has continued “to try to find creative ways to closure sale and primarily acquires properties expand capacity such as with partners.” through market purchases and transfers from Notably, FCALBA is working with Atlanta’s governmental and nonprofit entities.63 In 2009, community land trust initiative, a separate non- FCALBA began implementing a depository profit entity promoting permanent affordable agreement with such entities, primarily com- housing through shared equity ownership, as munity development corporations (“CDCs”). described above. This initiative is a unique and The CDCs transfer tax-delinquent properties innovative collaboration between the land bank to FCALBA, which clears the title and waives and the land trust to promote affordable hous- the back taxes.64 FCALBA can hold the prop- ing. As explained above, land trusts promote erty for 3-5 years and can transfer the prop- permanent affordable housing through shared erty back to the CDC anytime. It is expected equity ownership. The land trust owns the land that development of the property will begin so can ensure that it is perpetually used for af- immediately upon removal from FCALBA. fordable housing purposes, and the occupants The depository program has been very well re- own the structures. The FCALBA will assist the ceived by the land bank’s partners. According land trust with acquiring properties and clear- to Christopher Norman, Executive Director of ing title, and some of its current properties will 66 FCALBA, the land bank currently holds about be transferred to the land trust. The FCALBA’s 200 properties through this program. Some of partnerships may be instructive to other com- those properties are vacant lots, but most are munities seeking to promote affordable housing residential properties. and utilize land banks creatively. FCALBA’s inventory primarily consists of Along those lines, Georgia established the residential properties. However, it also assists Georgia Association of Land Bank Authorities Atlanta with creating parks and green spaces by (“Association”) in August 2011 to allow the acquiring properties, clearing title, and transfer- state’s land banks to share information, com- ring them to the Department of Parks, Recre- mon practices, and opportunities. The Associa- ation and Cultural Affairs. In addition, the land tion also serves as an advocate for the state’s bank is currently re-examining its strategic plan land banks and assists with launching new land and may choose to also acquire industrial and banks. FCALBA is involved in the Association commercial properties beginning in the next and recently assisted a neighboring county with 67 couple of years.65 launching its own land bank. FCALBA’s accomplishments are especially D. praiseworthy considering it has a staff of four. It works with companies New York passed legislation in July 2011 and consultants, but, as Norman explained, authorizing the creation of 10 land banks to it must balance the county’s large number of acquire tax delinquent, foreclosed, vacant, or vacant and foreclosed properties with its op- abandoned properties.68 F. Michael Tucker, erational constraints. Residents call Norman President and CEO of the Center for Economic

© 2012 Thomson Reuters 7 SEPTEMBER 2012 | Vol. 35 | No. 9 Zoning and Planning Law Report

Growth, a regional economic development or- as well as Erie County; (2) the City of Syra- ganization based in Albany, explained that New cuse and Onondaga County; (3) the City of York initially authorized 10 land banks as a pilot Schenectady, County of Schenectady, and City program, and if the state receives many applica- of Amsterdam; (4) Chautauqua County; and tions, which is anticipated, the legislature may (5) the City of Newburgh.77 Tucker highlights be encouraged to expand the program. New the importance of flexibility in any regional York “has recognized the value a land bank can scheme because communities have different ap- play in a local community,” he stated. proaches and concerns. According to Tucker, Any foreclosing governmental unit (“FGU”), attendees of recent sessions in Albany, held to defined as any tax district, may create aland educate public and private sector officials on bank, which shall be a type C not-for-profit land banks, were very excited about the poten- corporation, by adopting a local law, ordinance tial for land banking. or resolution specifying: the name of the land bank; the number of members of the board of IV. Concerns? directors (which may be 5, 7, 9, or 11); the ini- tial members and their qualifications and length Not all land banks have been as successful as of term; the manner of selection or appointment the land banks discussed above. For example, and terms of office; and the articles of - incor there have been ongoing complaints that the St. poration of the land bank.69 An FGU may join Louis land bank, the Land Reutilization Au- with one or more FGUs or with any municipal- thority (“LRA”), is holding onto properties for ity to create a land bank through an intergov- too long and has rejected many worthy offers ernmental cooperation agreement.70 Each land to purchase properties.78 The LRA was created bank must be approved by the state’s urban de- in 1971 and owns thousands of parcels for fu- velopment corporation.71 The land banks must ture development.79 It is organized for top-down maintain an inventory and are authorized to de- development and must keep an inventory of its velop, demolish, and rehabilitate acquired prop- properties and classify them according to poten- erties.72 They may not acquire property through tial use—whether they can be used for public eminent domain.73 Thus, to acquire a property or private use or whether they are presently us- through eminent domain, a would able or not.80 However, it is less powerful than first have to acquire the property through emi- the modern land banks created in recent years, nent domain and then transfer title to the land which may have more robust funding mecha- bank,74 a process that could be more expensive nisms and the ability to acquire more properties and less effective. Importantly, New York’s land according to the land banks’ plans and goals, banks have the right to all property that has such as the New York land banks. been seized for unpaid taxes, giving the land In addition, the Wayne County land bank in banks greater opportunity to acquire properties Michigan has recently undergone significant that will assist in their land redevelopment and scrutiny and reform following a scandal in- assemblage, rather than just coping with the left volving the county’s former chief development over properties that no investor wanted.75 officer, Turkia Awada Mullin, who ran the land Since only 10 will be authorized, some coun- bank from 2007 until October 2009.81 During ties and municipalities pooled together as re- that time, Mullin awarded no-bid contracts, gional applicants.76 As of May 2012, five land including to associates and political contribu- banks were approved in New York: (1) the Cit- tors, totaling $750,000.82 The county paid her ies of Buffalo, Lackawanna, and Tonawanda, a $200,000 when she left her posi-

8 © 2012 Thomson Reuters Zoning and Planning Law Report SEPTEMBER 2012 | Vol. 35 | No. 9

tion at the land bank to become CEO of the Land banking faces numerous challenges. county airport, from which she was fired a These include expanding successful land bank- month later.83 ing to other localities, which may require state While these cases are troublesome, these legislation streamlining tax foreclosures and problems do not seem to be ones that are innate giving land banks sufficient powers and funding to land banks, but rather to organizations that mechanisms. Moreover, as Frangos articulated, suffer from insufficient authority or mismanage- even where land banks exist, the problem of ment and lack of transparency. Furthermore, vacant and abandoned properties in urban cen- Frank S. Alexander, professor at Emory Law ters is not letting up. “The challenge is how do School and director of the Project on Afford- we continue to address the problem with that able Housing and Community Development, much surplus being thrown at us?” In addition, explains that “[l]and banking is not employed acquiring and rehabilitating or demolishing in- to formulate the large scale acquisition of prop- dustrial and commercial properties can be pro- hibitively expensive, especially because of envi- erties simply in order to hold a large public in- ronmental clean-up costs. However, larger land ventory of land[,]” but rather to reoccupy and banks in Michigan are taking on commercial repurpose them as soon as possible.84 As dem- property successfully, and, as Kildee explains, onstrated above, land banks can be successfully “there is no public entity better positioned to established and managed. deal with those properties.” Land banks have a public responsibility and the tools to repurpose V. Conclusions these properties in a manner consistent with Although certain land banks have been criti- their communities’ needs. cized for holding onto properties for too long Confronting these challenges, land bank lead- or inadequately maintaining them, land banking ers are asking, in Frangos’s words, “How do we has enabled communities to repurpose proper- keep the momentum going?” Not surprisingly, ties and increase affordable housing despite seri- the answer may be as varied as the geography of ous funding constraints and a nationwide hous- distressed properties, state and local laws, and ing crisis. Also, a land bank does not own every the needs and capacities of our communities. distressed property in its jurisdiction, but it often receives the worst ones. Successful land banks Notes have figured out how to prioritize properties for 1. See Table 982, Total Housing Inventory for the repurposing them in alignment with community United States: 1990 to 2010, U.S. Census Bureau development plans. The successful examples dis- (2012), available at http://tinyurl.com/82d7v2p. cussed above indicate that the first step to effec- 2. See, e.g., Econsult Corporation, et al., Vacant in : The Costs of tive land banking must often be state legislation the Current System and the Benefits of Reform, that streamlines the tax foreclosure process and 6-8 & 10-12 (Nov. 2010), available at http://ti- authorizes the creation of land banks with suffi- nyurl.com/7ragxq2 (vacant properties reduce cient powers and funding to be proactive and ef- property values by 6.5% throughout Philadel- fective. While not a silver bullet, land banks can phia, and up to 20% in certain neighborhoods, and owe at least $2 million/year in uncollected help stabilize neighborhood property values and property taxes). provide municipalities with a means of handling 3. See, e.g., Econsult Corporation, et al., Vacant the responsibilities and costs associated with va- Land Management in Philadelphia: The Costs cant and abandoned properties. of the Current System and the Benefits of Re-

© 2012 Thomson Reuters 9 SEPTEMBER 2012 | Vol. 35 | No. 9 Zoning and Planning Law Report

form, 6-8 & 9-10 (Nov. 2010), available at Land Banks and Land Banking, 20 (June 2011); http://tinyurl.com/7ragxq2 (although the city HUD, Revitalizing Foreclosed Properties with controls a minority of Philadelphia’s vacant Land Banks, 9 (2009). properties, its maintenance costs are over $20 18. Frank S. Alexander, Land Banks and Land Bank- million each year). ing, 20 (June 2011). 4. See Frank S. Alexander & Leslie A. Powell, 19. Frank S. Alexander, Land Banks and Land Bank- Neighborhood Stabilization Strategies for Vacant ing, 20 (June 2011). and Abandoned Properties, 34 Zoning & Plan- 20. HUD, Revitalizing Foreclosed Properties with ning Law Report 1 (2011); Jessica A. Bacher, Ad- Land Banks, 9 (2009). dressing Distressed Properties: Legal Tools, 39 R.E.L.J. 207 (2010); Dwight H. Merriam, Help- 21. See 2003 Mich. Pub. Act 258, §§ 124.754(4), ing Development in a Down Economy, 50 Mu- 124.755(1) & 124.765; Frank S. Alexander, Land nicipal Lawyer 14 (2009). Banks and Land Banking, 21 (June 2011). 5. Frank S. Alexander, Land Banks and Land Bank- 22. MICH. COMP. LAWS § 124.773(4)-(5) (2011); ing, 39-40 (June 2011). see MICH. COMP. LAWS § 124.753(n) (defin- ing “qualified city” as “a city that contains a first 6. Frank S. Alexander, Land Banks and Land Bank- class school district and includes any department ing, 18-19 (June 2011). or agency of the city.”). 7. Frank S. Alexander, Land Banks and Land Bank- 23. 2003 Mich. Pub. Act 258 § 124.773; Frank S. ing, 19-20 (June 2011). Alexander, Land Banks and Land Banking, 49 8. Frank S. Alexander, Land Banks and Land Bank- (June 2011). ing, 22 (June 2011). 24. See 2003 Mich. Pub. Act 258 §§ 124.754, 124.763 9. HUD, Revitalizing Foreclosed Properties with & 124.769(1); Frank S. Alexander, Land Banks Land Banks, 4 (2009) (depiction of general cre- and Land Banking, 50-52 (June 2011); EPA, ation and functions of land banks). Land Revitalization Fact Sheet: Land Banking 2, 10. HUD, Revitalizing Foreclosed Properties with http://tinyurl.com/6n8w9ns (last visited July 10, Land Banks, 3 (2009) (depiction of general cre- 2012); HUD, Revitalizing Foreclosed Properties ation and functions of land banks). with Land Banks, 11 (2009). 11. See Frank S. Alexander, Land Banks and Land 25. MICH. COMP. LAWS § 124.763 (2011). Banking, 28-29 (June 2011). 26. HUD, Revitalizing Foreclosed Properties with 12. See Julie A. Tappendorf & Brent O. Denzin, Turn- Land Banks, 10 (2009). ing Vacant Properties into Community Assets Through Land Banking, 43 Urban Lawyer 807- 27. See HUD, Revitalizing Foreclosed Properties with 08 (2011); EPA, Land Revitalization Fact Sheet: Land Banks, 10 (2009). Land Banking 1, http://tinyurl.com/6n8w9ns (last 28. HUD, Revitalizing Foreclosed Properties with visited July 10, 2012). Land Banks, 10 (2009). 13. See Julie A. Tappendorf & Brent O. Denzin, Turn- 29. See HUD, Revitalizing Foreclosed Properties with ing Vacant Properties into Community Assets Land Banks, 11 (2009). Through Land Banking, 43 Urban Lawyer 807- 30. See MICH. COMP. LAWS § 124.757(1); Frank 09 (2011). S. Alexander, Land Banks and Land Banking, 47 14. Julie A. Tappendorf & Brent O. Denzin, Turn- (June 2011). ing Vacant Properties into Community Assets 31. The adjacent property owner may also have to Through Land Banking, 43 Urban Lawyer 810 pay taxes if the property was foreclosed before (2011). 2004. See Genesee County Land Bank, Frequently 15. HUD, Revitalizing Foreclosed Properties with Asked Questions, www.thelandbank.org/faq.asp Land Banks, 10 (2009). (last visited July 10, 2012). 16. See 1893 Mich. Pub. Act 206, as amended by 32. HUD, Revitalizing Foreclosed Properties with 1999 Mich. Pub. Act 123. Land Banks, 3 (2009). 17. See 1893 Mich. Pub. Act 206, as amended by 33. Frank S. Alexander, Land Banks and Land Bank- 1999 Mich. Pub. Act 123; Frank S. Alexander, ing, 53 (June 2011).

10 © 2012 Thomson Reuters Zoning and Planning Law Report SEPTEMBER 2012 | Vol. 35 | No. 9

34. Kristin Longley, Genesee County Land Bank to ent, and Beyond, 2009-2011, 13 (2011) (through Take Record Foreclosures from Flint Amid Bud- November 2010, CCLRC obtained over $6 mil- get Cuts, mlive.com (Jan. 4, 2012), http://tinyurl. lion from interest and penalties on delinquent com/6oduekd. property taxes and assessments); Conversation 35. Kristin Longley, Genesee County Land Bank to with Gus Frangos, President and General Counsel Take Record Foreclosures from Flint Amid Bud- of CCLRC, on Jan. 5, 2012. get Cuts, mlive.com (Jan. 4, 2012), http://tinyurl. 47. EPA, Land Revitalization Fact Sheet: Land Bank- com/6oduekd. ing 2, http://tinyurl.com/6n8w9ns (last visited 36. See Sandra Livingston, New Foreclosure Filings July 10, 2012). in Cuyahoga County Remain High and Advance 48. W. Dennis Keating, Cuyahoga County Land Re- in the Suburbs (Feb. 1, 2010), http://tinyurl. utilization Corporation: The Beginning, the Pres- com/7g4venp (noting almost 14,800 foreclosures ent, and Beyond, 2009-2011, 16 (2011). for the county in 2009, “the fourth year in a row 49. W. Dennis Keating, Cuyahoga County Land Re- that new filings topped 13,800”); Kathryn W. utilization Corporation: The Beginning, the Pres- Hexter & Molly Schnoke, Responding to Fore- ent, and Beyond, 2009-2011, 15 (2011); Conver- closures in Cuyahoga County, 1 & 3 (Sept. 25, sation with Gus Frangos, President and General 2009), available at http://tinyurl.com/6urulfn Counsel of CCLRC, on Jan. 5, 2012. (Cuyahoga County is “at the epicenter of the fore- closure crisis”). 50. Conversation with Gus Frangos, President and General Counsel of CCLRC, on Jan. 5, 2012. 37. See Frank S. Alexander, Land Banks and Land Banking, 21 (June 2011). 51. W. Dennis Keating, Cuyahoga County Land Re- 38. W. Dennis Keating, Cuyahoga County Land Re- utilization Corporation: The Beginning, the Pres- utilization Corporation: The Beginning, the Pres- ent, and Beyond, 2009-2011, 15 (2011). ent, and Beyond, 2009-2011, 13 (2011). 52. Conversation with Gus Frangos, President and 39. W. Dennis Keating, Cuyahoga County Land Re- General Counsel of CCLRC, on Jan. 5, 2012. utilization Corporation: The Beginning, the Pres- 53. Rachel Teron, Northeast Ohio Organizations ent, and Beyond, 2009-2011, 16 (2011). Plan to Offer Abandoned Homes to Immigrants, 40. See Ohio H.B. 313, 128th Leg. Gen. Assem. (2010). newsnet5.com (Dec. 13, 2011), http://tinyurl. 41. Conversation with Gus Frangos, President and com/bm7jvly. General Counsel of CCLRC, on Jan. 5, 2012. 54. See O.C.G.A. § 48-4-61(a) (2011). 42. Conversation with Gus Frangos, President and 55. O.C.G.A. §§ 48-4-61(b) and 48-4-62(a) (2011). General Counsel of CCLRC, on Jan. 5, 2012; 56. O.C.G.A. § 48-4-64(c) (2011). Ohio H.B. 603, 117th Legis. Gen. Assem. (1988); 57. O.C.G.A. §§ 48-4-64(e) and 48-4-65 (2011). Ohio S.B. 294, 126th Leg. Gen. Assem. (2006). 58. O.C.G.A. § 48-4-63(b)(1)-(2) (2011). 43. Thomas J. Fitzpatrick IV, Understanding Ohio’s 59. See HUD, Revitalizing Foreclosed Properties with Land Bank Legislation, Federal Reserve Bank of Land Banks, 16 (2009). Cleveland 8 (Jan. 2009). 60. Interlocal Cooperation Agreement Establishing 44. Conversation with Gus Frangos, President and the Fulton County/City of Atlanta Land Bank General Counsel of CCLRC, on Jan. 5, 2012. Authority, Inc., Art. IX, § B(1) (1994). 45. W. Dennis Keating, Cuyahoga County Land Re- 61. See HUD, Revitalizing Foreclosed Properties with utilization Corporation: The Beginning, the Pres- Land Banks, 17 (2009). ent, and Beyond, 2009-2011, 9 (2011); Thomas J. Fitzpatrick IV, Understanding Ohio’s Land Bank 62. Conversation with Christopher Norman, Execu- Legislation, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland tive Director of the FCALBA (Jan. 10, 2012). 9-10 (Jan. 2009); Conversation with Gus Fran- 63. See HUD, Revitalizing Foreclosed Properties with gos, President and General Counsel of CCLRC, Land Banks, 17 (2009). on Jan. 5, 2012. 64. HUD, Revitalizing Foreclosed Properties with 46. W. Dennis Keating, Cuyahoga County Land Re- Land Banks, 17 (2009); Frank S. Alexander, Land utilization Corporation: The Beginning, the Pres- Banks and Land Banking, 17 (June 2011).

© 2012 Thomson Reuters 11 SEPTEMBER 2012 | Vol. 35 | No. 9 Zoning and Planning Law Report

65. Conversation with Christopher Norman, Execu- 77. Five Approved to Create Land Banks, Empire tive Director of the FCALBA (Jan. 10, 2012). State Future, http://tinyurl.com/88h9xb9. 66. Conversation with Christopher Norman, Execu- 78. Tim Logan, City’s Land Plan Has Successes, tive Director of the FCALBA (Jan. 10, 2012). Shortcomings (Feb. 25, 2012), http://tinyurl.com/ 67. Conversation with Christopher Norman, Execu- cpsy3ur. tive Director of the FCALBA (Jan. 10, 2012). 79. Tim Logan, City’s Land Plan Has Successes, 68. See N.Y. Not-for-Profit Corp. Law §§ 1600-1617. Shortcomings (Feb. 25, 2012), http://tinyurl.com/ 69. N.Y. Not-for-Profit Corp. Law §§ 1602(c), cpsy3ur (in the last four decades, St. Louis’s land 1603(a) & 1603(f). bank acquired over 11,000 properties, and it is 70. N.Y. Not-for-Profit Corp. Law § 1603(b)-(c). the largest land owner in the city). 71. N.Y. Not-for-Profit Corp. Law § 1603(g); Empire 80. MO. REV. STAT. § 92.900(2). State Development, Land Bank Approval Guide- 81. John Wisely, Turkia Awada Mullin Key in No-Bid lines (Nov. 2011), available at http://tinyurl. Land Bank Contracts that Went to Associates, com/7zoqghk. Contributors, Detroit Free Press (Nov. 13, 2011), 72. See N.Y. Not-for-Profit Corp. Law §§ 1607(a) http://tinyurl.com/7mkt4pm (last visited July 10, (13) & 1608(g) (2011); Empire State Develop- 2012). ment, Land Bank Approval Guidelines (Nov. 82. John Wisely, Turkia Awada Mullin Key in No-Bid 2011), available at http://tinyurl.com/7zoqghk. Land Bank Contracts that Went to Associates, 73. N.Y. Not-for-Profit Corp. Law § 1607(b) (2011). Contributors, Detroit Free Press (Nov. 13, 2011), 74. New York State Association of Counties, New http://tinyurl.com/7mkt4pm (last visited July 10, York’s Land Bank Act 4 (Nov. 2011), available at 2012). http://tinyurl.com/7qyvfnh. 83. John Wisely, Turkia Awada Mullin Doubles 75. Tim Logan, City’s Land Plan Has Successes, Amount She Says Nonprofit Paid Her to $150,000, Shortcomings (Feb. 25, 2012), http://tinyurl.com/ Detroit Free Press (May 6, 2012), http://tinyurl. cpsy3ur. com/6tlol5n (last visited July 10, 2012). 76. See Lauren Stanforth, State Holds Back on 84. Frank S. Alexander, Land Banking as Metropoli- Land Banks (Dec. 31, 2011), http://tinyurl. tan Policy, Blueprint for American Prosperity, 7 com/7bhvoka. (Oct. 2008).

Visit West on the Internet! store.westlaw.com

12 © 2012 Thomson Reuters