DOCSLIB.ORG

State and Local Ad Valorem Taxation of Mineral Interests Working Paper WP15CK1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State and Local Ad Valorem Taxation of Mineral Interests Working Paper WP15CK1 State and Local Ad Valorem Taxation of Mineral Interests Working Paper WP15CK1 Calvin A. Kent Ph.D. AAS Marshall University January 2016 The findings and conclusions of this Working Paper reflect the views of the author(s) and have not been subject to a detailed review by the staff of the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Contact the Lincoln Institute with questions or requests for permission to reprint this paper. [email protected] © 2015 Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Abstract Since subsurface minerals are usually severed from the surface (land) estate, unique problems are created for establishing the value of minerals for ad valorem taxation. All states having significant production of minerals levy either severance or property taxes (or both). The unique character of minerals makes valuation one of the most difficult processes for the assessor. The methods used vary by state. Because of the complexity, in many states the state government or private consultants determine value for local jurisdictions. The legal environment which governs the relationship between subsurface and surface owners influences the value and use of the land and the mineral. When full consideration is given, it is unlikely that the ad valorem taxation of mineral interests meets the criteria established by economists for what constitutes a “good tax”. This paper explores the ways used to value mineral interests, the legal environment and what this implies for tax policy. Keywords: Property taxes, ad valorem, severance, minerals, oil, gas, coal, state and local taxes, appraisal, assessment, tax incidence and shifting Conclusions 1. Most subsurface mineral interests have been split from the surface estate creating a separate legal taxable entity for ad valorem purposes. 2. Like surface land, minerals are fixed in geographic location and are not affected by the rate of property taxation. 3. Two methods are used for the ad valorem taxation of mineral interests: the severance approach and the reserves approach. 4. There is no single model which explains taxation of mineral interests in the states studied. 5. Valuation of mineral interests provides unique problems in the process of valuation. 6. Subsurface mineral interests have dominance over surface interests in that surface owners may not “unreasonably’ restrict the development of subsurface mineral rights. 7. While the exploitation of mineral interests predominates over surface interests under the rule of capture there are certain protections of surface owners’ rights including: correlative rights, negligence and trespass. 8. Most states have adopted “accommodations” legislation which further protects surface owners. 9. The presence of mineral interests influences the value of the surface land. 10. The unique features of mineral rights make valuation more difficult than for other types of property. 11. There have been no appraisal standards developed for use in mass appraisal of mineral property. 12. Of the three approaches to valuation (cost, comparative sales and income) the last is the principal method used for ad valorem taxation of mineral estates. 13. Among the states there are two methods for applying the income approach: “severance” and “reserves”. Under the former current or average income and production is used. Under the latter, mineral reserves in the ground is the base. 14. Among the most difficult steps in using the income approach is determining the discount rate. 15. In using the income approach adequate consideration must be given to determining allowable costs. 16. The question of “who pays the property tax on minerals?” is not settled as the taxes may or may not be shifted. 17. Ad valorem taxes on minerals do not conform to either the benefits received or capitalization theories of incidence. 18. Since there are insufficient sales of mineral interests in most cases, it is not possible for assessors to use statistical tools for assessment validation. 19. The ad valorem taxation of mineral interests does not conform to any of the established standards for a “good” tax. About the Author Calvin A. Kent PhD. AAS is Lewis Distinguished Professor of Business at Marshall University, Huntington WV and a former College of Business Dean and University Vice President. He is a member of the West Virginia Property Valuation Commission. For the International Association of Assessing Officers (IAAO) he is on the Leadership Council, Committee on Excellence in Assessment Administration in addition to being a nationally certified instructor for advanced appraisal courses and holder of the Assessment Administration Specialist (AAS) designation. Marshall/CBER 1 John Marshall Drive Huntington WV 25755 E-mail [email protected] Phone 304 5287228 Acknowledgements The author expresses his deep appreciation to the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy who awarded him a David C. Lincoln Fellowship under which this work was completed. The state and local officials below gave their time to explain the details of their tax systems. Alaska • Ronald Brown, State Assessor, Anchorage AK • Jim Greeley, State Oil & Gas Assessor, Anchorage AK Arkansas • Robert McGee, Division Administrator, Assessment Coordination Department, Little Rock AR 7/30/2014 California • Andrew Johnson, Supervising Appraiser, Oil and Gas Division, Kern Co. CA • Elizabeth Johnson, Geothermal Officer, Department of Conservation, State of California Colorado • Rick Davis, Senior Appraiser, El Pasco County Assessor’s Office, Colorado Springs CO • Christopher M. Woodruff, Weld County Assessor, Greely CO Ohio • Rebecca Luck, Division Council, Tax Equalization Division, Ohio Department of Revenue, Columbus OH Pennsylvania • John Frazier, CPE Chief Assessor, Green County. Waynesburg PA • Jeffrey Kern, President, Resource Technology Corporation, University Park PA Louisiana • Conrad T Comeaux, Lafayette Parish Tax Assessor, Lafayette LA • Celeste Moss, Public Service Assistant Director, Louisiana Tax Commission, Baton Rouge LA Texas • Rodney Kert, Director of Mineral Appraisals, Pritchard and Abbott, Ft. Worth TX 7/28/2014 • Angie Ballard, Jefferson County Appraisal District, Beaumont TX West Virginia • Mark Muchow, Deputy Secretary, Department of Revenue, State of West Virginia, Charleston WV • Kris Pinkerman, Assistant Director, Property Tax Division WV Department of Taxation and Revenue. Charleston WV Wyoming • Craig Grenvik, Administrator, Mineral Tax Division, Wyoming Department of Revenue, Cheyenne WY Also to commend Ayokunle Aanuoluwapo for his work as research assistant. Lisa Christopher provided excellent administrative assistance. Table of Contents Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 2 Land Value Taxation and Ad Valorem Taxation of Mineral Interests ........................................... 4 Severance Funds ............................................................................................................................. 5 Development of Mineral Resources ................................................................................................ 6 Severed Mineral Interests ............................................................................................................... 8 Use of the Surface Land ................................................................................................................ 10 Rule of Capture ......................................................................................................................... 11 Correlative Rights ..................................................................................................................... 11 Accommodation Doctrine ......................................................................................................... 12 Negligence by Mineral Operator ............................................................................................... 14 Trespass ..................................................................................................................................... 14 Adjacent Property ...................................................................................................................... 15 Pooling or Unitizing .................................................................................................................. 15 Coal and other Hard Rock Minerals .......................................................................................... 16 Subsidence ................................................................................................................................. 17 Site Value Taxation and Mineral Rights ....................................................................................... 18 Approaches to Ad Valorem Taxation of Mineral Interests ........................................................... 19 Severance Approach .................................................................................................................. 19 Reserves Approach .................................................................................................................... 19 Unique Features of Minerals ..................................................................................................... 19 Appraisal Standards .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Provided, That the Foregoing Shall Not Restrict Seller from Taking
    policy or arrangement providing for severance or termination payor benefits (provided, that the foregoing shall not restrict Seller from taking any such action so long as Parent or Buyer, as applicable, will not be bound by any such action (including as it may relate to the terms ofany offer to any Employee pursuant to Section 5.8(a) hereof) ifany Employee covered thereby becomes employed by Parent or Buyer in connection with the Transaction), or (vii) engage in any hiring practices that are not in the Ordinary Course ofBusiness; (k) not make any material loans, advances or capital contributions to, or investments in, any other Person (other than, to the extent not in violation of applicable Law, customary loans or advances to employees in amounts not material to the maker of such loan or advance and other than to any Subsidiary of Seller in the Ordinary Course); (I) not settle any claims, actions, arbitrations, disputes or other proceedings that would result in Seller or any of its Affiliates being enjoined in any respect material to the Transaction or any Specified Business or that would affect any Specified Business after the Closing (other than in a de minimis manner); (m) not make any material change in any method of accounting, keeping ofbooks of account or accounting practices or in any material method ofTax accounting of Seller or any of its Subsidiaries unless required (i) by a concurrent change in GAAP or applicable Law or (ii) upon prior written notice to Buyer, in order to comply with any GAAP requirements or FASB interpretations
    [Show full text]
  • Colony Capital Q1 2017 Supplemental Financial Presentation
    Supplemental Financial Report First Quarter 2017 May 9, 2017 NYSE:CLNS | A Diversified Equity REIT Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements This presentation may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” or “potential” or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words or phrases which are predictions of or indicate future events or trends and which do not relate solely to historical matters. You can also identify forward-looking statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and contingencies, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, and may cause the Company’s actual results to differ significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statement. Factors that might cause such a difference include, without limitation, our failure to achieve anticipated synergies in and benefits of the completed merger among NorthStar Asset Management Group Inc., Colony Capital, Inc. and NorthStar Realty Finance Corp., Colony NorthStar’s liquidity, including
    [Show full text]
  • The Process of Gentrification: Ä, Comparative Analysis
    The Process of Gentrification: Ä, Comparative Analysis by Donna A" Fedora A thesis presented to the University of Manitoba in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Masters of City Planning l-n Department of City Planning Faculty of .A,rchitecture Winnipeg, Manitoba (c) Donna A. Fedora, L989 Bibtiothèque nationate ffi@ffi |¡8'*1,ouo.,',n du Canada Canadian Theses Service Service des thèses canadiennes Otlawa. Can¿da KI A ON4 The author has granted an ¡nevocable non- L'auteur a accordé une l¡cence inévocable et exclusive licence allowing the NationalUbrary non exclus¡ve permettant à la Bibliothèque of Canada to reproduce, toan, distibute or sell nationale du Canada:de reproduire, prêter, cop¡es of his/her thesis by any means and in distribuer ou vendre des copies de sa thèse any fo{m or format, mak¡ng this thesis ava¡lable de quelque man¡ère et sous quelque forme to interested persons. que ce so¡t pour mettre des exemplaires de cette thèse à la disposition des personnes intéressées. The author retains ownership of the copyright L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit in his/her thesis. Neither d'auteur the thesis nor qui prot{¡e sa thèse. Ni la thèse nides extraits substantial extracts from it may be printed or substantiels de celle-ci ne doivent être othenruise reproduced without per- his/her imprimés ou autrement reproduits sans son mission. autorisation. r SBftt 0-315*71.7Ë7_4 Canada THE PROCESS OF GENTRIFICATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BY DONNA A. FEDORA ^A thesis subnitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of the University of Manitoba in partial fulfillnent of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF CITY PLANNING (c) 1ee0 Pennission has been granted to the LIBR.ARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MÄNITOBA to lend or selL copies of this thesis, to the NATIONAL LIBRÄRY OF CANADÀ to nicrofilm this thesis and to lend or se1l copies of the film, and UNIVERSITY MICROFILMS to publish an abstract of this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for Objecting to a Minor Variance And/Or a Land Severance
    GUIDE FOR OBJECTING TO A MINOR VARIANCE AND/OR A LAND SEVERANCE Prepared by Frank G. Oakes, Barrister & Solicitor, May 16, 2011 The following is offered as a brief guide for persons wishing to object to an Application to the Committee of Adjustment (the Committee) for a minor variance of a zoning bylaw and/or division or severance of land. OBJECTING TO A MINOR VARIANCE Sub-section 45(l) of the Planning Act (PA) sets out four Statutory Tests which must be considered by the Committee and satisfied by the applicant, before an Application for zoning variance can succeed. If the Application fails any one of the four Tests, while passing the other three, then the PA requires that the Application must fail. These Tests, being created by statute, are mandatory and all must be met. Notwithstanding that a proponent may satisfy all four Tests, the Committee may in its discretion refuse relief. The following are the four Tests to be applied; 1. Is the variance minor? A variance can be held to be not minor for two reasons, that it is too large or too important to be considered minor. The latter reason can be resolved by determining the extent of the impact on neighbouring properties in the immediate and general area. The primary issues raised for abutting owners are related to loss of sunlight, privacy, views, spacing and openness which may result from the mass, height and bulk of the proposed development. There may also be issues related to access, trees, parking, drainage, traffic and noise. The issues that may arise related to the general area are that the development is incompatible with the established built form and character of the neighbourhood and that it erodes the aesthetics of the streetscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Colony Northstar Announces First Quarter 2018 Financial Results
    Colony NorthStar Announces First Quarter 2018 Financial Results May 10, 2018 LOS ANGELES & NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 10, 2018-- Colony NorthStar, Inc. (NYSE:CLNS) and subsidiaries (collectively, “Colony NorthStar,” or the “Company”) today announced its financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2018 and the Company’s Board of Directors declared a second quarter 2018 cash dividend of $0.11 per share of Class A and Class B common stock. First Quarter 2018 Financial Results and Highlights First quarter 2018 net loss attributable to common stockholders of $(72.7) million, or $(0.14) per share, and Core FFO of $115.1 million, or $0.20 per share The Company’s Board of Directors declared and paid a first quarter 2018 dividend of $0.11 per share of Class A and B common stock During the first quarter 2018, the Company raised approximately $2.0 billion of third-party capital (including amounts representing its share related to affiliates) from institutional clients The Company, in partnership with Digital Bridge, established a digital real estate infrastructure vehicle with $1.95 billion of capital raised as of March 31, 2018, inclusive of a $162 million capital commitment by certain subsidiaries of the Company During the first quarter 2018, the Company completed $60 million of Other Equity and Debt asset monetizations During the first quarter 2018, the Company invested and agreed to invest $113 million in Other Equity and Debt primarily with an objective of creating investment management structures around these investments The Company repurchased approximately 48.2 million shares of its Class A common stock at an average price of $5.79 per share, or $279 million, year-to-date 2018 Listed Colony NorthStar Credit Real Estate, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit 99.2 2017 Q2 Supplement
    Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements This presentation may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward- looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” or “potential” or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words or phrases which are predictions of or indicate future events or trends and which do not relate solely to historical matters. You can also identify forward-looking statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and contingencies, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, and may cause the Company’s actual results to differ significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statement. Factors that might cause such a difference include, without limitation, our failure to achieve anticipated synergies in and benefits of the completed merger among NorthStar Asset Management Group Inc. ("NSAM"), Colony Capital, Inc. ("Colony") and NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. ("NRF"), Colony NorthStar’s liquidity, including its ability to complete identified monetization transactions and other
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1: Evaluating Borrower Income Chapter 4
    HB-1-3550 CHAPTER 4: BORROWER ELIGIBILITY 4.1 OVERVIEW Ensuring that all applicants served are eligible and receive the correct amount of assistance is a significant responsibility of Loan Originators and Loan Approval Officials. A borrower must be income-eligible, demonstrate a credit history that indicates ability and willingness to repay a loan, and meet a variety of other program requirements. This chapter provides guidance for each of these areas. • Section 1: Evaluating Borrower Income provides instructions for calculating and verifying annual, adjusted, and repayment income. • Section 2: Evaluating Borrower Assets discusses Agency requirements for cash contributions to the purchase and methods for computing income from assets. • Section 3: Credit History identifies indicators of acceptable and unacceptable credit and provides instructions for reviewing an applicant’s credit history. • Section 4: Other Eligibility Requirements addresses a variety of other requirements applicants must meet to be eligible for the program. • Section 5: Processing the Certificate of Eligibility provides policies and procedures for processing Form FD 1944-59, Certificate of Eligibility. SECTION 1: EVALUATING BORROWER INCOME 4.2 OVERVIEW [7 CFR 3550.53(a) and (g), 7 CFR 3550.54] Loan Originators use income information to: (1) help determine whether an applicant is eligible for a loan; (2) calculate the applicant’s ability to repay a loan; and (3) determine the amount of the loan and the amount of payment subsidy the household can obtain. When reviewing an applicant’s repayment income, the Loan Originator must determine whether the income is stable and dependable. This will typically be accomplished by reviewing information provided in the application, paystubs, tax returns, and oral verifications.
    [Show full text]
  • Severance Consent Application B21/2021 and Zoning Amendment
    Staff Report Meeting Date: 08 Jun 2021 To: Mayor and Members of Council From: Liz Stillman, Planning Coordinator Report No./Subject: PLN-2021-39 re: Severance Consent Application B21/2021 and Zoning Amendment Application C12/2021, Concession 5, Part of Lot 2, 6th Line West, former Township of Seymour - Kevin Little / Ron Little Staff Recommendation: __ Receive for Information X Action Required Be it resolved that Staff Report PLN-2021-39, Liz Stillman, Planning Coordinator re: Severance Consent Application B21/2021 and Zoning Amendment Application C12/2021, Concession 5, Part of Lot 2, 6th Line West, former Township of Seymour - Kevin Little / Ron Little, be received for information. Severance Consent Application B21/2021 That Severance Consent Application B21/2021, Kevin Little / Ron Little, with respect to property located in Concession 5, Part of Lot 2, 6th Line West, Roll # 14 35 134 010 13900 0000, former Township of Seymour, for application to sever one (1) new parcel, being approximately 2.0 acres (vacant land) for residential building purposes, from approximately 98 acres, in which the retained portion is vacant land and will be eligible for residential building purposes, be approved with the following conditions: 1. That $1,000.00 for each new vacant building lot created, is paid cash-in-lieu of parkland pursuant to Section 53 of the Planning Act, RSO 1990, as amended, and the Municipality of Trent Hills By-law 2001-47. 2. That all taxes on the subject properties be paid in full, including any tax installment(s) due within the month of receipt of the severance consent deed(s) for processing at the municipal office.
    [Show full text]
  • Gentrification and the Ethics of Home Katherine Joanne Nopper
    † Designated as an Exemplary Final Project for 2017-18 Gentrification and the Ethics of Home Katherine Joanne Nopper Faculty Advisor: Joseph Richard Winters Religious Studies African and African American Studies April 2018 This project was submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Graduate Liberal Studies Program in the Graduate School of Duke University. Copyright by Katherine Joanne Nopper 2018 Abstract Gentrification is the subject of a recent wave of books and scholarship, continuing debates regarding the responsibilities of the “gentrifiers” and the impact of gentrifying landscapes on marginalized communities. This project looks in a different direction, using a multi-media approach to investigate the ethics of home in relation to aesthetics, architecture, capitalism and the culture industry. Strongly informed by the critical thought of Theodor Adorno, five essays bring multiple disciplines and theories together: Marxist geography (David Harvey, Neil Smith), architecture (Sarah Goldhagen, Lester Walker), philosophy and history (Walter Benjamin, Adorno), African American literature (Octavia Butler, Toni Morrison, Pauli Murray), and decolonial literature and thought (Ousmane Sembène, Franz Fanon, Aimé Césaire). Incorporating citations and literary passages, as well as the author’s own photography and linocut prints, the project images the contradictions inherent in the idea of home and emphasizes the impossibility of living an ethical life under capitalism. iii Contents Introduction………………………………...………………………………….1 Chapter One: Accumulation………………………………………………………....7 Chapter Two: Environment…………………………………...……………………30 Chapter Three: Proximity…………………………………………………….52 Chapter Four: Fetish…………………………………………………….……67 Chapter Five: Gentrifier…………………………………………………..….90 Bibliography…………………………………………………..……………103 iv Acknowledgments In my first weeks at Duke I was fortunate to meet my advisor, recognizing even then that my studies here would be profoundly influenced by our conversations and his enthusiasm.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal Severance and the Exclusion of Time in Determining the Economic Value of Regulated Property
    Temporal Severance and the Exclusion of Time in Determining the Economic Value of Regulated Property By CARLA BoYD* THE RIGHT TO OWN property and do with it as one chooses is a cherished right of every United States citizen. At the same time, this individual liberty must be tempered with protection of the environ- ment and society as a whole. The law of regulatory takings sits in the balance of these often conflicting purposes. This Comment focuses on one specific area of regulatory takings jurisprudence-conceptual sev- erance in general and temporal severance in particular. A regulatory taking occurs when the government regulates in such a way that it unduly interferes with the bundle of rights associated with a land- owner's property.' A regulatory taking requires compensation when it goes "too far."2 A critical question in determining whether this has 3 occurred is what portion of the landowner's property is considered. Should the courts consider the regulation's impact on the entire par- cel of land or only the land directly affected by the regulation? The latter approach, known as "conceptual severance," severs the portions 4 of land affected by the regulation from the unaffected portions. The related approach of "temporal severance" involves a tempo- rary rather than permanent regulation.5 In determining whether a regulation has gone "too far" in this instance, it is necessary to ask whether the courts should examine the impact of the regulation on * Class of 2003. The author would like to thank her grandparents Herb and Widgie Hastings for their unconditional love and support, and Professor Alice Kaswan for her valuable assistance in the development of this Comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Responding to the Business Impacts of COVID-19
    Responding to the Business Impacts of COVID-19 Navigating legal issues across 80+ territories Report on key legal considerations, including answers to common questions relating to Labour Law, Contract Law, Insolvency Law, Cybersecurity & Privacy Laws and Corporate Law VOLUME 1 - Americas, Asia-Pacific, Middle East & Africa 5 November 2020 back to territories index COVID-19: PwC Global Legal Network 1 Introduction COVID-19: Global Legal Report 5 May 2020 Dear Reader, In a constantly changing environment, COVID-19 is continuing to present significant challenges to both people and organisations around the globe. Many of you will be facing potentially significant business challenges to which you need to respond rapidly. To help you navigate through the complexity, PwC’s team of legal specialists have collaborated to create a resource covering some of the most relevant legal considerations for businesses. That information has been brought together in Volumes 1 and 2 of this Report and includes answers to common questions relating to: ● Labour Law, ● Contract Law, ● Insolvency Law, ● Cybersecurity & Privacy Laws; and ● Corporate Law. Reflecting commentary from more than 80 territories across our Global Legal Network, this Report is one of the most geographically comprehensive legal resources currently available on these topics. The hyperlinks in the ‘Territories Index’ will allow you to easily navigate across the two Volumes and access information for countries that are of most interest to you in a print-ready format. Alternatively, you can navigate this information, together with key insights regarding tax, economic and other government measures, using our online navigation tool: https://pwc.to/2QUBeCA If you would like further assistance on these issues, please either reach out to your usual PwC contact or the relevant Territory Contact listed in the Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Severance Town Center Redevelopment Plan
    PROPOSAL FOR: Severance Town Center Redevelopment Plan ADDITIONAL PROJECT INFORMATION NOVEMBER 1, 2019 RELEVANT PLANNING EXPERIENCE RELERELEVANTVANT PLPLANNINGANNING EXPERIENCE PROJECT RELEVANCE TO SEVERANCE REDEVELOPMENT Under- Greyfield Maximizing Integrated Applied Performing Mixed-Use Community Sustainable Market Based Redevelop- Investment Financial Urbanism PROJECT / RELEVANCE Shopping Program Engagement Objectives Study ment Potential Approach Principles Centers The Collection X X X X X X Normandale Town Center X X X X X X X The Esplanade X X X X X X X X Northfield Stapleton Town Center X X X X X Ninth and Penn X X X X X X X X Wilkinsburg Master Plan X X X X X X Tanglewood Mall Redevelopment Plan X X X X X X X X Dayton Mall Redevelopment Strategy X X X X X X Civic Point X X X X X X The Landmark Mall X X X X X X Assembly Square/Row X X X X X X X Bridge Street Development X X X X X X X X East Franklinton Innovation District X X X X X X X X Confidential Mall Development X X X X X X The Shops at Hudson Yards X X X X X X Miami Worldcenter X X X X X X Heartland Town Square X X X X X X Hilltown Stapleton X X X X X X Severance Town Center Redevelopment Plan 3 RELEVANT PLANNING EXPERIENCE THE COLLECTION Confidential Project Type: Master Plan To do this, AE7 created unique retail themed ‘clusters’ such Project Size: 24.5 Acres as luxury home goods, foodie market district, and electric Client: Confidential car showplace.
    [Show full text]