Green and Open Space Planning for Urban Consolidation – a Review of the Literature and Best Practice

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Green and Open Space Planning for Urban Consolidation – a Review of the Literature and Best Practice Green and open space planning for urban consolidation – A review of the literature and best practice Author Byrne, Jason, Sipe, Neil Published 2010 Copyright Statement © The Author(s) 2010. The attached file is reproduced here with permission of the copyright owners for your personal use only. No further distribution permitted. For information about this monograph please refer to the publisher's website or contact the authors. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/34502 Link to published version https://www.griffith.edu.au/ Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Green and open space planning for urban consolidation – A review of the literature and best practice Jason Byrne and Neil Sipe Urban Research Program Issues Paper 11 March 2010 THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Green and open space planning for urban consolidation – A review of the literature and best practice Jason Byrne and Neil Sipe Urban Research Program Issues Paper 11 March 2010 The Urban Research Program acknowledges the generous support provided by Brisbane City Council in the production of the Urban Research Program publication series. © Jason Byrne and Neil Sipe Urban Research Program ISBN 978-1-921291-96-8 Griffith University Brisbane, QLD 4111 www.griffith.edu.au/urp All photographs copyright © and were taken by Jason Byrne unless otherwise indicated. Figures 3, 29 & 30 reproduced courtesy of Daniel O’Hare, Bond University. Copyright protects this material. Except as permitted by the Copyright Act, reproduction by any means (photocopying, electronic, mechanical, recording or otherwise), making available online, electronic transmission or other publication of this material is prohibited without the prior written permission of the Urban Research Program. About the Urban Research Program The Urban Research Program (URP) was established in 2003 as strategic research and community engagement initiative of Griffith University. The strategic foci of the Urban Research Program are research and advocacy in an urban regional context. The Urban Research Program seeks to improve understanding of, and develop innovative responses to Australia’s urban challenges and opportunities by conducting and disseminating research, advocating new policy directions, and by providing training assistance. We aim to make the results of our research and advocacy work available as freely and widely as possible. Urban Research Program publication series URP Issues Papers tackle current problems and challenges, and advocate potential new directions in Australian urban policy. URP Research Papers impart findings and conclusions from our research program. The Issues Papers and Research Papers are edited by Stephen Horton, Centre Manager and Adjunct Research Fellow in the Urban Research Program. Email: [email protected]. All URP publications and can be downloaded from our website free of charge: www.griffith.edu.au/urp Hard copies are available for purchase. Contact via email, [email protected]. About the Authors Dr Jason Byrne is a lecturer in the Griffith School of Environment and an academic member of the Urban Research Program. Associate Professor Neil Sipe is head of the planning discipline in the Griffith School of Environment and an academic member of the Urban Research Program. Email: [email protected] [email protected] Acknowledgements This issues paper is based on work completed in a report that was commissioned and funded by the Queensland Department of Infrastructure and Planning. THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 Study area .................................................................................................................................................1 What types of spaces are being considered? .......................................................................................2 Scope and purpose of the review .........................................................................................................3 Greenspace research .............................................................................................................3 Density and greenspace interactions....................................................................................................3 Higher density residents and their greenspace needs...................................................................................4 No two parks are the same ..............................................................................................................................5 How built environments affect greenspace use............................................................................................7 Reasons to provide greenspace.............................................................................................................7 Ecological benefits ............................................................................................................................................9 Social benefits.....................................................................................................................................................9 Economic benefits.............................................................................................................................................9 Synopsis....................................................................................................................................................9 A typology of urban green/open spaces............................................................................. 10 Parks........................................................................................................................................................10 Plazas ......................................................................................................................................................14 A typology of plazas........................................................................................................................................16 Urban trails/greenways ........................................................................................................................16 Streets .....................................................................................................................................................17 Synopsis..................................................................................................................................................19 Planning standards .............................................................................................................20 Standards vs. needs...............................................................................................................................20 Factors affecting park and green and open space use .....................................................................22 Safety .................................................................................................................................................................22 Cultural differences .........................................................................................................................................22 Aesthetics..........................................................................................................................................................22 Time, transport, attitudes, preferences & ability ........................................................................................22 Needs-based assessments ....................................................................................................................23 Best practice in needs-based greenspace planning.....................................................................................24 Synopsis..................................................................................................................................................24 Best planning practice in green/open space assessment ..................................................24 Greenspace needs assessment in inner Brisbane..............................................................................26 Walking and cycling distance.........................................................................................................................26 Characterising greenspace in the study area................................................................................................26 Socio-demographic characteristics of the study area.................................................................................26 Synopsis..................................................................................................................................................27 Australian case studies........................................................................................................27 East Perth, WA .....................................................................................................................................27 Darling Harbour, Sydney, NSW .........................................................................................................28 Federation Square, Melbourne, VIC..................................................................................................29 Southbank, Brisbane,
Recommended publications
  • Urban Parks, Urban Icons? the Case of Bicentennial Park in Sydney
    U H P H 2 0 1 6 I c o n s : T h e M a k i n g , M e a n i n g a n d U n d o i n g o f U r b a n I c o n s a n d I c o n i c C i t i e s | 505 Urban Parks, Urban Icons? The case of Bicentennial Park in Sydney Catherine Evans Faculty of the Built Environment, UNSW [email protected] This paper explores the question of how urban parks function as urban icons. It examines Bicentennial Park in Homebush Bay, 12 km west of the Sydney Central Business District (CBD) as a case study. Bicentennial Park was planned and designed between 1983 and 1988, a time when Australia, and its cities in particular, grappled with tensions between celebrating achievements of two hundred years of European settlement and redressing the cultural and ecological harm wrought by those achievements. The research focuses on a review of material related to the design and promotion of the park, and early reviews of the park. The discussion explores the influence of specific ideas about the city and ecology on the transformations of use, materiality, and physical form of the land that became Bicentennial Park. Findings reveal that Bicentennial Park at Homebush Bay was conceived as an awkwardly scripted design, which in turn reflects a convergence of urban planning initiatives, intensifying environmental awareness and ideological tensions within the then nascent Australian- based profession of landscape architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Trip to Australia March 4 to April 3, 2014
    TRIP TO AUSTRALIA MARCH 4 TO APRIL 3, 2014 We timed this trip so that we'd be in Australia at the beginning of their fall season, reasoning that had we come two months earlier we would have experienced some of the most brutal summer weather that the continent had ever known. Temperatures over 40°C (104°F) were common in the cities that we planned to visit: Sydney (in New South Wales), Melbourne* (in Victoria), and Adelaide (in South Australia); and _____________________________________________________________ *Melbourne, for example, had a high of 47°C (117°F) on January 21; and several cities in the interior regions of NSW, Vic, and SA had temperatures of about 50°C (122°F) during Decem ber-January. _______________________________________________________________ there were dangerous brush fires not far from populated areas. As it turned out, we were quite fortunate: typical daily highs were around 25°C (although Adelaide soared to 33°C several days after we left it) and there were only a couple of days of rain. In m y earlier travelogs, I paid tribute to m y wife for her brilliant planning of our journey. So it was this time as well. In the months leading up to our departure, we (i.e., Lee) did yeoman (yeowoman? yo, woman?) work in these areas: (1) deciding which regions of Australia to visit; (2) scouring web sites, in consultation with the travel agency Southern Crossings, for suitable lodging; (3) negotiating with Southern Crossings (with the assistance of Stefan Bisciglia of Specialty Cruise and Villas, a fam ily-run travel agency in Gig Harbor) concerning city and country tours, tickets to events, advice on sights, etc.; and (4) reading several web sites and travel books.
    [Show full text]
  • Insider Influences on Urban Consolidation Policies in Melbourne
    Property Ownership and Planning Regulation: Insider Influences on Urban Consolidation Policies in Melbourne A thesis in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Elizabeth Taylor BUPD (Hons.) School of Global Studies, Social Science and Planning (GSSSP) RMIT University February 2011 i ii Declaration I certify that, except where due acknowledgement has been made, the work is that of the author alone; the work has not been submitted previously, in whole or in part, to qualify for any other academic award; the content of the thesis is the result of work that has been carried out since the official commencement date of the approved research program; any editorial work, paid or unpaid, carried out by a third party is acknowledged; and that ethics procedures and guidelines have been followed. Elizabeth Taylor February 2011 iii Acknowledgements Many thanks to my primary and secondary supervisors, Professor Gavin Wood and Associate Professor Robin Goodman. I would especially like to thank them both for always making time to help with this thesis. Particular thanks to Gavin for his input on the design of the models, and to Robin for helping bring together the main arguments. Valuable feedback on the submitted version of the thesis was given by the two external examiners. I have also received valuable technical input and guidance at different points from: Michael Ball, Melek Cigdem, Christian Nygaard, Ashton de Silva and Dag Einar Sommervoll. Customised data was supplied for the research by the Office of the Victorian Valuer General, and the Victorian Department of Planning and Community Development.
    [Show full text]
  • Playing in the Bush Recreation and National Parks in New South Wales
    Playing in the bush Recreation and national parks in New South Wales Edited by Richard White and Caroline Ford Published 2012 by Sydney University Press SYDNEY UNIVERSITY PRESS University of Sydney Library sydney.edu.au/sup © Individual authors 2012 © Sydney University Press 2012 Reproduction and Communication for other purposes Except as permitted under the Act, no part of this edition may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or communicated in any form or by any means without prior written permission. All requests for reproduction or communication should be made to Sydney University Press at the address below: Sydney University Press Fisher Library F03 University of Sydney NSW 2006 AUSTRALIA Email: [email protected] National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Playing in the bush : recreation and national parks in New South Wales / edited by Richard White and Caroline Ford. ISBN: 9781743320020 (pbk.) Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Wilderness area users--New South Wales--Attitudes Wilderness areas--Recreational use--New South Wales Natural areas--Public use--New South Wales--History National parks and reserves--New South Wales--Management Outdoor recreation--New South Wales--Management. Other Authors/Contributors: White, Richard Ford, Caroline M Dewey Number: 333.7809944 Cover design by Miguel Yamin, the University Publishing Service Printed in Australia Contents Foreword 5 Acknowledgements 7 Notes on contributors 9 Introduction 13 Richard White and Caroline Ford 1. The recreational rationale in NSW national parks 17 Richard White 2. Flirting with the picturesque: the effects of Romanticism and romance 41 Ella Barnett 3. It’s not all fun and games: rules, regulations and bad behaviour 73 Justine Greenwood 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2001-2002 (PDF
    2001 2002 Annual report NSW national Parks & Wildlife service Published by NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service PO Box 1967, Hurstville 2220 Copyright © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2002 ISSN 0158-0965 Coordinator: Christine Sultana Editor: Catherine Munro Design and layout: Harley & Jones design Printed by: Agency Printing Front cover photos (from top left): Sturt National Park (G Robertson/NPWS); Bouddi National Park (J Winter/NPWS); Banksias, Gibraltar Range National Park Copies of this report are available from the National Parks Centre, (P Green/NPWS); Launch of Backyard Buddies program (NPWS); Pacific black duck 102 George St, The Rocks, Sydney, phone 1300 361 967; or (P Green); Beyers Cottage, Hill End Historic Site (G Ashley/NPWS). NPWS Mail Order, PO Box 1967, Hurstville 2220, phone: 9585 6533. Back cover photos (from left): Python tree, Gossia bidwillii (P Green); Repatriation of Aboriginal remains, La Perouse (C Bento/Australian Museum); This report can also be downloaded from the NPWS website: Rainforest, Nightcap National Park (P Green/NPWS); Northern banjo frog (J Little). www.npws.nsw.gov.au Inside front cover: Sturt National Park (G Robertson/NPWS). Annual report 2001-2002 NPWS mission G Robertson/NPWS NSW national Parks & Wildlife service 2 Contents Director-General’s foreword 6 3Conservation management 43 Working with Aboriginal communities 44 Overview Joint management of national parks 44 Mission statement 8 Aboriginal heritage 46 Role and functions 8 Outside the reserve system 47 Customers, partners and stakeholders
    [Show full text]
  • Regulating Urban Densification: What Factors Should Be Used? Buildings and Cities, 2(1), Pp
    Regulating urban SPECIAL COLLECTION: densification: what factors URBAN DENSIFICATION should be used? EDITORIAL JACQUES TELLER HIGHLIGHTS CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Jacques Teller Urban densification is increasingly accepted as a necessity and is important for no-net Department of Urban and land take. Densification occurs in many places, especially fast-growing cities with a Environmental Engineering, combination of demographic change, economic pressure and large transport infrastructure University of Liège, Liege, projects. The costs and benefits of density require a nuanced understanding: potential Belgium direct, indirect and cumulative effects (environmental, economic and social), both on- [email protected] and off-site. The optimisation of densities implies a need to identify the conditions that can create the most value for the city, specify the places most appropriate for future inhabitants and activities, and promote spatial justice. The papers published in this special KEYWORDS: issue converge in depicting urban densification as a complex, nonlinear process, which affordable housing; cities; has to be addressed at various scales. Multifactorial metrics of density are superior to density; land take; land aggregated ones because they offer a better understanding of the urban forms and how use; social practices; urban densification; urban planning they are experienced by inhabitants and users. Both hard and soft densification have to be duly monitored and regulated if cities are to avoid overcrowding of places and buildings, which can be detrimental to urban resilience. The relation between urban densification TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Teller, J. (2021). Regulating and housing affordability is a critical factor that policymakers must address. urban densification: what factors should be used? Buildings and Cities, 2(1), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Kit
    Great West Walk: Information kit Contents Overview ................................................................................................................. 2 Public transport ....................................................................................................... 4 Vehicle access ........................................................................................................ 7 Parking .................................................................................................................... 9 Food and drink ........................................................................................................ 9 Water and toilets ................................................................................................... 10 Maps ..................................................................................................................... 12 Ascent/ descent graphs ......................................................................................... 14 Great West Walk highlights ................................................................................... 15 1 Overview This 65-kilometre stretching from Parramatta to the foot of the Blue Mountains, crosses a kaleidoscope of varying landscapes, including protected Cumberland Plain woodland, local river systems, public parklands, some of Australia’s oldest architecture and Western Sydney’s iconic urban landscapes. While the terrain is relatively flat and an abundance of shared paths make for easy walking, it is the scenery that
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction As Proponents of Urban Consolidation and Conso
    Urban Consolidation Factors and Fallacies in Urban Consolidation: Introduction As proponents of urban consolidation and consolidated living continue to manifest in our society, we must ensure that our acknowledgment of its benefits, and the problems of its agitator (sprawl), do not hinder our caution over its continually changing objectives. Definition Like much urban policy, the potential benefits that urban consolidation and the urban village concept seek to offer are substantially undermined by ambiguous definition. This ambiguity, as expressed through a general lack of inter-governmental and inter-professional cohesion on this policy, can best be understood in terms of individual motives (AIUSH,1991). * State Government^s participatory role in the reduction of infrastructure spending. * Urban Professional^s recognition of the increased variability, robustness, and interest in both the urban area and their work. * Conservation Activist^s commendation of the lower consumption of resources, and reduced pressure on sensitive environment areas, suggestive of a reduction in urban sprawl. * The Development Industry^s equations of profit established through better and higher levels of land use. Essentially urban consolidation proposes an increase of either population or dwellings in an existing defined urban area (Roseth,1991). Furthermore, the suburban village seeks to establish this intensification within a more specific agenda, in which community is to be centred by public transport nodes, and housing choice is to be widened with increased diversity of housing type (Jackson,1998). The underlying premise of this swing towards urban regeneration, and the subsequent debate about higher-density development, is the reconsideration of the suburban ideal and the negative social and environmental implications inherent in its continuation (Johnson, 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Urban Growth
    Managing Urban Growth Commission 2 Report 2011 Commission 2 Managing Urban Growth Presidency: Melbourne Vice-Presidency: Cairo Chair: The Hon. Justin Madden, MLC, Former Minister for Planning, Government of Victoria Vice-chair: HE Mr Ahmed El-Maghraby, Minister of Housing, Utilities and Urban Development, Egypt Coordinator: Mary Lewin, Manager International Affairs, Department of Planning and Community Development, Government of Victoria Participating Cities: Addis Ababa, Agra, Ahmedabad, Bamako, Bangalore, Barcelona, Belo Horizonte, Berlin, Cairo, Dakar, Douala, Isfahan, Guarulhos, Gyeonggi Province, Istanbul, Jamshedpur, Kolkata, Madrid, Manila, Mashhad, Melbourne, Mexico (State of), Moscow, New Delhi, Pune, Shiraz, São Paulo, Tabriz, Tehran, Udaipur, Vancouver Other Organizations: Global Cities Research Institute (RMIT University), UN Global Compact Cities Programme, Regional Vancouver Urban Observatory (RVu), National Institute of Urban Affairs (India), UN-Habitat, Urban Age Institute, ARUP Australia, IBM Acknowledgements: Mary Lewin, David Wilmoth, Christine Oakley, Meg Holden, Paul James, Lyndsay Neilson, Stephanie McCarthy, Matthew Snow, Peter Sagar, Art Truter Authors: See acknowledgements Managing Urban Growth Table of Contents 4 { INTRODUCTION 5 01. { URBANISATION AND GOVERNANCE 1.1. { Defining urbanisation and urban growth 5 1.2. { Responses to the challenges of urbanisation 10 23 02. { INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE 2.1. { The good management of urban infrastructure 23 2.2. { The scale of the infrastructure challenge 26 2.3. { Responses 28 44 03. { INEQUITIES AND SOCIAL INCLUSION 3.1. { Defining positive social inclusion 44 3.2. { Positive responses 46 54 04. { LOCAL, REGIONAL AND GLOBAL ECONOMIES 4.1. { Issues and challenges 54 4.2. { Responses in the economic domain 57 61 05. { THE ENVIRONMENT 5.1. { Issues and challenges 62 5.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Centennial Parklands Rejuvenation Lone Xanthorrhoea Fights for Life
    THE MAGAZINE OF CENTENNIAL PARKLANDS VOLUME 32 • SPRING 2005 VOLUME Plan of Management on exhibition Cycles of renewal– Centennial Parklands rejuvenation Lone Xanthorrhoea fights for life Directions Parkbench In the winter Despite a low risk to public health, the Location demands that Area 2 must edition of Centennial Park and Moore Park Trust continue to be made available for Parklands, I decided to close the area until further intermittent on-grass parking, while the wrote about investigations, in consultation with the Trust explores alternative long-term The EQ is OK Golf Driving Range relaunch the challenges Environment Protection Authority parking solutions. The Entertainment Quarter (EQ) is the new The Hon Sandra Nori MP, Minister for Tourism and Sport and Recreation, of reconciling and WorkCover. In addition to implementing the RAP, name for the retail/entertainment area was guest of honour at the relaunch of Moore Park Golf Course driving issues of As part of the detailed investigation the Trust plans to undertake landscaping formerly part of Fox Studios. Entertainment is range in July 2005. The refurbished long-term process other contaminants, polycyclic and design work to reinstate Area 2 as a EQ’s aim with over 20 restaurants, cafes and driving range was not the only cause for sustainability aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), were robust green space for the community to bars and more than a dozen retail stores. celebration. A number of associated with the discovered below the surface. But we enjoy for unstructured leisure or events, There is no better cinema experience than works around the Golf House and growing reopened Area 2 notwithstanding, on as well as intermittent on-grass parking.
    [Show full text]
  • 2025 Vision Macedonia2025's Research Newsletter Winter 2017-18
    2025 Vision Macedonia2025's Research Newsletter Winter 2017-18 Welcome to the second edition of '2025 Vision', Macedonia2025's Research Newsletter! This issue looks at the diaspora in Australia, scratching beneath the surface to see who Macedonian-Australians really are. We also look at the highlights from our sixth annual Summit, which like a fine wine it is getting even better with age. Interviews this month cover the economic outlook for Macedonia from Dimitar Bogov, Governor of the National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia; and telecommunications in Macedonia from Ivan Skenderoski, Founder and Director of Salience, Dubai. We also have our regular look at the quarterly Country Dashboard data and economic news as well as the open calls to our executive education and development programs. Wishing you a great year! Brendan Filipovski, Research manager, Macedonia2025 [email protected] To view the content in pdf. please click HERE Q3 2017: A modest return to growth but 2017 still looking low Macedonia Country Dashboard - 2017 Q2 update: After last quarter's decrease in real growth, Macedonia's economy returned to modest growth in the third quarter of 2017 (0.17 per cent increase in real GDP, year-ending). However, without a big increase in the fourth quarter, real GDP is likely to be well down for 2017. To continue reading please click HERE Who are the Macedonian-Australians? Australia has one of the largest Macedonian Diasporas. Data released from the 2016 census allows us to scratch beneath the surface to see who the Macedonian Australians are. To continue reading please click HERE Macedonia2025 Summit 2017 Highlights There are three main problems that more than 160 countries are facing: Education, Rural development and Poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • Density and Outer Urban Development in Melbourne
    City Structures 07 Density and Outer Urban Development in Melbourne Michael Buxton Jan Scheurer RMIT University, Melbourne Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT For decades, Australian planners generally have accepted the conventional position that increasing the density of urban settlement on the urban fringe will reduce the quality of suburban living but achieve negligible land savings (Bunker 1986, Braby, 1989, McLoughlin, 1991, Gutjahr, 1991, and Lewis, 1999). McLoughlin, for example, argued that increasing outer urban density would not significantly restrict outward urban growth because the amount of land required for roads and utility infrastructure, retail and service centres, schools and other community facilities and public open space must remain constant regardless of the area devoted to residential dwellings and the population. This paper analyses this conventional position, related policy positions of Australian governments, and current practice. It analyses the assumptions and values inherent in the position and shows that the amount of land required for non-residential purposes is not a constant. The paper demonstrates that increased residential densities and a reduced area devoted to non-residential purposes may improve residential amenity and save significant amounts of land. The issue of residential density is once again an important issue in strategic land use planning in Australia. Most major cities have completed or are completing new strategic plans. These generally seek to increase residential densities. The paper examines the relationships between density and other components of urban form and the relationships between these elements and the notion of sustainability. The paper reviews the approach advocated in the Melbourne strategic plan, Melbourne 2030, to planning for outer urban development in Melbourne.
    [Show full text]