DOCSLIB.ORG

JOHN and the BOOK of SIGNS (8) the RAISING of LAZARUS John 11:1-44 Jeffrey S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JOHN and the BOOK of SIGNS (8) the RAISING of LAZARUS John 11:1-44 Jeffrey S JOHN AND THE BOOK OF SIGNS (8) THE RAISING OF LAZARUS John 11:1-44 Jeffrey S. Carlson March 18, 2018 SCRIPTURE 1A man named Lazarus was sick. He lived in Bethany with his sisters, Mary and Martha. 2This is the Mary who later poured the expensive perfume on the Lord’s feet and wiped them with her hair. Her brother, Lazarus, was sick. 3So the two sisters sent a message to Jesus telling him, “Lord, your dear friend is very sick.” 4But when Jesus heard about it he said, “Lazarus’s sickness will not end in death. No, it happened for the glory of God so that the Son of God will receive glory from this.” 5So although Jesus loved Martha, Mary, and Lazarus, 6he stayed where he was for the next two days. 7Finally, he said to his disciples, “Let’s go back to Judea.” 8But his disciples objected. “Rabbi,” they said, “only a few days ago the people in Judea were trying to stone you. Are you going there again?” 9Jesus replied, “There are twelve hours of daylight every day. During the day people can walk safely. They can see because they have the light of this world. 10But at night there is danger of stumbling because they have no light.” 11Then he said, “Our friend Lazarus has fallen asleep, but now I will go and wake him up.” 12The disciples said, “Lord, if he is sleeping, he will soon get better!” 13They thought Jesus meant Lazarus was simply sleeping, but Jesus meant Lazarus had died. 14So he told them plainly, “Lazarus is dead. 15And for your sakes, I’m glad I wasn’t there, for now you will really believe. Come, let’s go see him.” 16Thomas, nicknamed the Twin, said to his fellow disciples, “Let’s go, too—and die with Jesus.” 17When Jesus arrived at Bethany, he was told that Lazarus had already been in his grave for four days. 18Bethany was only a few miles down the road from Jerusalem, 19and many of the people had come to console Martha and Mary in their loss. 20When Martha got word that Jesus was coming, she went to meet him. But Mary stayed in the house. 21Martha said to Jesus, “Lord, if only you had been here, my brother would not have died. 22But even now I know that God will give you whatever you ask.” 23Jesus told her, “Your brother will rise again.” 24“Yes,” Martha said, “he will rise when everyone else rises, at the last day.” 25Jesus told her, “I am the resurrection and the life. Anyone who believes in me will live, even after dying. 26Everyone who lives in me and believes in me will never ever die. 1 Do you believe this, Martha?” 27“Yes, Lord,” she told him. “I have always believed you are the Messiah, the Son of God, the one who has come into the world from God.” 28Then she returned to Mary. She called Mary aside from the mourners and told her, “The Teacher is here and wants to see you.” 29So Mary immediately went to him. 30Jesus had stayed outside the village, at the place where Martha met him. 31When the people who were at the house consoling Mary saw her leave so hastily, they assumed she was going to Lazarus’s grave to weep. So they followed her there. 32When Mary arrived and saw Jesus, she fell at his feet and said, “Lord, if only you had been here, my brother would not have died.” 33When Jesus saw her weeping and saw the other people wailing with her, a deep anger welled up within him, and he was deeply troubled. 34“Where have you put him?” he asked them. They told him, “Lord, come and see.” 35Then Jesus wept. 36The people who were standing nearby said, “See how much he loved him!” 37But some said, “This man healed a blind man. Couldn’t he have kept Lazarus from dying?” 38Jesus was still angry as he arrived at the tomb, a cave with a stone rolled across its entrance. 39“Roll the stone aside,” Jesus told them. But Martha, the dead man’s sister, protested, “Lord, he has been dead for four days. The smell will be terrible.” 40Jesus responded, “Didn’t I tell you that you would see God’s glory if you believe?” 41So they rolled the stone aside. Then Jesus looked up to heaven and said, “Father, thank you for hearing me. 42You always hear me, but I said it out loud for the sake of all these people standing here, so that they will believe you sent me.” 43Then Jesus shouted, “Lazarus, come out!” 44And the dead man came out, his hands and feet bound in graveclothes, his face wrapped in a headcloth. Jesus told them, “Unwrap him and let him go!” (John 11:1-44 NLT). INTRODUCTION The last and greatest of the seven signs in the Book of Signs within the Gospel of John is the raising of Lazarus. It constitute the high point of Jesus’ work in the world. It also foreshadows Jesus’ own death and resurrection as well as triggers his opposition’s resolve to take official action to kill him. Some object to this story of Lazarus because they claim it cannot be historical since the synoptic gospels do not mention it. (The term “synoptic gospels” refers to Matthew, Mark and Luke which tend to chronicle the same events in much the same order.) However, the synoptic gospels tend to focus on Jesus’ Galilean ministry. Only one of their miracle stories takes place anywhere near Jerusalem (Bartimaeus in Jericho). John, 2 on the other hand, is mostly concerned about Jesus’ Judean ministry. Lazarus lived in Bethany – a village only 2 miles from Jerusalem in Judea. Furthermore, there is more than just one resurrection-like miracle in the gospels. There are three. Two take place in Galilee and so it makes sense they are found in the synoptic gospels (Mk 5:21-43; Lk 7:11-17). One takes place in Judea and so it makes sense that it is found in John (11:1-44). The synoptics are somewhat vague about the historical causes of Jesus’ death, but John offers a detailed and plausible account of the political considerations that led to Jesus’ execution. There are four scenes to this story, the fourth of which deals with the plot to kill Jesus. For our purposes this morning we will be looking at the first three scenes as they have to do with the miraculous sign itself. Each of these three scenes has a misdirect – a conditional statement that, even if it were true, totally misses the point. 1. SCENE ONE: JESUS EAST OF THE JORDAN The first scene has Jesus east of the Jordan River. The misdirect is this: “If Lazarus is sleeping then that means he is getting better and we don’t need to visit him.” John identifies Jesus’ location by saying it was where John the Baptist had been baptizing (10:40; 1:28). He could have just given the name of the location but that may have confused some of his readers. Jesus is in Bethany. His friends, Lazarus, Mary and Martha live in Bethany. Lazarus became sick and so the sisters send a message to Jesus – a journey that would take a messenger at least a day to make. Did I mention that Jesus is in Bethany? The messenger came from Bethany. Are you confused? In order to help you through this I am going to make you more confused. How many of you know I was born in Portage? I was actually born in Portage. However, I did not grow up there – I grew up in a town about 16 miles away called “Wisconsin Dells.” Some of you are thinking, “Now hold on a minute. Wisconsin Dells is in Wisconsin and it’s a heck a lot farther than 16 miles from Portage to Wisconsin Dells.” No, it’s not. The confusion lies in the fact we are talking about two towns with the same name. You know about Portage, Michigan. I was born in Portage, Wisconsin. In Jesus’ day there were two towns named Bethany – Bethany of Perea, and Bethany of Judea. Lazarus, Mary and Martha lived in Bethany of Judea. Mary and Martha sent word of Lazarus’ illness to Jesus who was in Bethany of Perea. 3 There are two men named Lazarus in the gospels. The other is mentioned in one of Jesus’ parables – the parable of Lazarus and the rich man (Lk 16:19-31). Both deal with an experience of death but beyond that and the name they are dissimilar. Lazarus was a popular name in the first century taken from Eleazar (ehl-ee-AY-zer) meaning “God is my help.” It is clear that Lazarus, Mary and Martha are close friends of Jesus. John assumes his readers already know of Mary and Martha from reading the other gospels (Lk 10:38-42) or from Mary’s reputation for having “poured the expensive perfume on the Lord's feet and wiped them with her hair (11:3; Mk 14:3-9). There are two facts here that seem to be in opposition to each other. Fact one, Jesus loved Lazarus, Mary and Martha. Fact two, he deliberately delayed two days before starting off to see Lazarus. This does not make sense unless he knew Lazarus was already dead. Let me point out that when Jesus does arrive, Lazarus has been in his tomb four days.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lamb of God" Title in John's Gospel: Background, Exegesis, and Major Themes Christiane Shaker [email protected]
    Seton Hall University eRepository @ Seton Hall Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs) Fall 12-2016 The "Lamb of God" Title in John's Gospel: Background, Exegesis, and Major Themes Christiane Shaker [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/dissertations Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Shaker, Christiane, "The "Lamb of God" Title in John's Gospel: Background, Exegesis, and Major Themes" (2016). Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs). 2220. https://scholarship.shu.edu/dissertations/2220 Seton Hall University THE “LAMB OF GOD” TITLE IN JOHN’S GOSPEL: BACKGROUND, EXEGESIS, AND MAJOR THEMES A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN THEOLOGY CONCENTRATION IN BIBLICAL THEOLOGY BY CHRISTIANE SHAKER South Orange, New Jersey October 2016 ©2016 Christiane Shaker Abstract This study focuses on the testimony of John the Baptist—“Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!” [ἴδε ὁ ἀµνὸς τοῦ θεοῦ ὁ αἴρων τὴν ἁµαρτίαν τοῦ κόσµου] (John 1:29, 36)—and its impact on the narrative of the Fourth Gospel. The goal is to provide a deeper understanding of this rich image and its influence on the Gospel. In an attempt to do so, three areas of concentration are explored. First, the most common and accepted views of the background of the “Lamb of God” title in first century Judaism and Christianity are reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Gospel of John the Gospel of John Is the Fourth Gospel
    Life & Teachings of Jesus Lecture 36, page 1 Introduction to the Gospel of John The Gospel of John is the fourth Gospel in our Bible and probably the fourth to be written, around A.D. 75-90, when the apostle John was an older man, perhaps finishing up his life’s work. Each Gospel has a theme-statement in the beginning or the end. The theme-statement of Luke, in chapter 4, is that Jesus came to preach the good news to the poor and all sorts of people and to release the captives. Mark tells us that his book is “the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.” Matthew, at the end of his Gospel, tells us that Jesus’ disciples should make disciples of all the nations. John’s purpose is given in chapter 20, verse 30: “Jesus did many other miraculous signs in the presence of his disciples, which are not recorded in this book. But these are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and by believing, you may have life in his name.” This is a familiar statement, but a study of the original Greek language offers some insights. John says his Gospel was written so that you might believe. In the Greek it is not clear whether he is writing in order that people might begin to believe or that people might continue to believe and be strengthened in their faith. You may have heard that John is an evangelistic Gospel written to lead people to believe for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • A Message from Pastor Gwen
    A Message from Pastor Gwen Let the words of my mouth and the mediation of my heart be acceptable to you, O Lord, my rock and my redeemer. AMEN Our reading today was a long one. It is the last, greatest sign and the most significant one in John’s Gospel. Since his writings are often referred to as “The Book of Signs”, there are many “signs” that point to God and can be seen only with eyes of faith. The first sign is Jesus changing water into wine at the wedding in Cana. Then came the healing of the official’s son in Chapter 4, which is followed by the healing of a paralytic in the next chapter. A big sign comes when Jesus feeds the five thousand with a few loaves of bread and a few fish. Continuing on, Jesus walks on water and gives sight to a blind man. And then comes our story of Lazarus, the greatest of signs and longest telling of a story. This story of raising Lazarus from the dead is very important, as it is a foretaste of what is to come for Jesus. Interestingly, if we follow the location of these signs we notice something happening there. The first two took place in Cana. Then the stories of signs moves to Jerusalem. The fourth and fifth sign take place in Galilee. And now today’s reading, this sign is the only one that takes place in Bethany. And if you know your geography of 1st century, you remember that Bethany is only about 2 miles from Jerusalem.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Reading
    Fifth Sunday of Lent 29.03.2020 By Pádraig Ó Tuama Introduction We speak about conflicts within ourselves, and also conflicts between individuals and communities. However, it is also true to recognise that conflict can be part of the human condition. Conflict can be the source of art and ache. Conflict can be the source of change and human transformation. It can be what calls us into our deepest yearning and our greatest endeavour. The text for this week, from the gospel of John (and towards the end of what theologians call John’s first 12 chapters “The Book of Signs”) brings us great themes of humanity: misunderstanding; grief; death; emotion; change; risk. One can approach this particular text as part of the Christological depiction of Jesus of Nazareth through the writings of the fourth gospel. One can also approach it, as we will do in this reflection, as a narrative that gathers in some of the existential crises of being human. How are we when we are in pain? How can we understand our selves and each other? We so often misunderstand each other and are unsure what to do. In our bodies, we are sites of great desire and emotion. The Jesus of John’s gospel, it is true, arrives on the scene a fully developed person, conscious and confident of his mission and identity as the Son of God. However, the Jesus of John is also depicted as a man of emotion, a man who loved his friends, and upon whom his friends depended and called, as Mary and Martha do when their brother Lazarus is on the brink of death.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicodemus: an Encounter
    Lumen et Vita ~ Vol. 3 ~ 2013 Nicodemus: An Encounter Joshua Johnson Boston College INTRODUCTION This paper offers an exegesis and interpretation of John 3:1-15, Jesus' encounter with Nicodemus, one of the gospel's most memorable characters. Central to this discussion will be the significance of the symbol of rebirth. I will conclude by synthesizing the themes that appear in the exegesis and interpretation section. We shall see that the Nicodemus story offers the reader a reconfiguration of reality as Nicodemus is invited to be born again by receiving Jesus. METHODOLOGY I will start by briefly discussing the methodology and philosophy behind my exegesis and LQWHUSUHWDWLRQ6SXUQLQJSKLORVRSK\PRVWRIWHQHQGVQRWLQ³QRSKLORVRSK\EXWXQFRQVFLRXV SKLORVRSK\DQGDOOWRRHDVLO\EDGSKLORVRSK\´1 Broadly, this reading is primarily literary and theological. That is, it reflects on how John's gospel reveals divine reality through the vehicle of narrative. This reading is more specifically hermeneutical, influenced by Paul Ricoeur and his interlocutors. Like Ricoeur, I take Aristotle's understanding of narrative as foundational: it is mythos-mi mesi s. Mythos³WKHDFWLYHVHQVHRIRUJDQL]LQJHYHQWVLQWRDV\VWHP´2 Mimesis: not merely a replica of an action, but an active recreation that produces events by emplotment.3 Reading a text involves threHOHYHOVRIPRYHPHQWVRIPLPHVLVWKH³SUHILJXUDWLRQ´RIWKHUHDGHU ZKRKDVQRWHQWHUHGLQWRWKHWH[WWKH³FRQILJXUDWLRQ´WKDWWKHWH[WZRUNVRQWKHUHDGHUE\LWV HPSORWPHQWDQGWKH³UHILJXUDWLRQ´RIWKHUHDGHUZKRVHZRUOGLVFKDQJHGE\UHDGLQJWKHWH[W4 The aim of exegesis is to clarify the intended configurational sense of the text. The text's work of configuration is not complete until this move has happened. Its intelligibility lies in the real world, it creates a world of its own, and it makes claims on the reader in the real world.
    [Show full text]
  • Thru the Bible: the Gospel of John: Introduction Lindisfarne Gospels
    Thru the Bible: The Gospel of John: Introduction Lindisfarne Gospels Authorship: Who wrote the Gospel of John – the Apostle, son of Zebedee (and brother of James), who was one of the Twelve, or another John? Or, to put it another way, what is the identity of the “beloved disciple”? In the closing editorial verses of the Gospel, it is this “beloved disciple” who is stated to be the witness and author of the events of the Gospel: “This is the disciple who is testifying to these things and has written them, and we know that his testimony is true.” John 21:24. Other passages that mention the ‘beloved disciple’ are 13:23-24; 18:15-16?; 19:26-27; 20:2-8; 21:7, 20, 23-24. 1. Traditional Authorship: John the Apostle, the son of Zebedee, one of Jesus’ original twelve disciples. In early church tradition, this became the most common attribution after the second century A.D., and is a commonly held view among laypeople and churches today. It is one that seems to be naturally suggested by the first mention of the “beloved disciple” reclining next to Jesus at the Last Supper in John 13:23-24, and the impression in the other gospels that Jesus ate the Passover meal with the “twelve” (Matt. 26:17-20; Mark 14:12-17). Some of the earliest external evidence comes from Irenaeus and Jerome: Gospel of John Folio • “Since, therefore, the tradition from the apostles does thus exist in the Church, and is permanent among us, let us revert to the Scriptural proof furnished by those apostles who did also write the Gospel, in which they recorded the doctrine regarding God, pointing out that our Lord Jesus Christ is the truth, and that no lie is in Him.”[cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Signs of God in the Gospel of John a Note to Teachers
    Signs of God in the Gospel of John A Note to Teachers Hopefully, the lessons speak for themselves, but I thought it might be helpful to offer some quick thoughts on the goals and overarching themes of this series on Jesus’s miracles in John’s Gospel. In this series, I want to take seriously John’s choice to use the word “sign” when presenting Jesus’s miracles. For John, the miracles point to something, and we can’t do justice to John’s Gospel without exploring what they’re pointing to. It’s often assumed that the signs point to the identity of Jesus. They reveal his power and, thereby, affirm his identity as Son of God and Messiah. That’s certainly true, and John tells us as much in his conclusion (John 20:30). But, within John’s theology, we can’t stop there. John tells us in his introduction that the Word has come into the world to reveal God. And throughout the gospel, Jesus will tell people that the Son speaks and acts as the Father speaks and acts. To see the Son is to see the Father. Thus, if the signs point to Jesus’s identity, they also at the same time point to God’s identity. The signs provide one way that the Word fulfills his mission to reveal God. Therefore, as we study the various signs in John’s Gospel, we’ll spend time appreciating the details of each story; but we’ll always come back to the overriding question, “What is Jesus showing us about God through this sign?” That’s the main question to ponder as you prepare your lessons, and that’s the main question to discuss in class.
    [Show full text]
  • The Symbolism of the Seven Miraculous Signs in John Greek
    8/24/2018 The Symbolism of the Seven Miraculous Signs in John THE WORD MADE FLESH: JESUS CHRIST IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN Eric D. Huntsman, Education Week 2018 Carl Bloch, Healing at the Pool of Bethesda Amazing Grace https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2arm5ydeJc Master the Tempest Is Raising https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ef2xgL45qX4 Greek Words for Miracle The English word miracle comes from the Latin miraculum, an object or action causing wonder. The three most common words used in Greek are: Greek English KJV Rendering References dynamis “powerful deed or work” “mighty work” Mark 6:2, 5; Matth 11:20–21, 23; 13:54, 58; 14:2; Luke 19:37 “miracle” Mark 9:39 (“miracle” in 6:52 understood by translators) “power” Luke 5:17 “virtue” Mark 5:30; Luke 6:19; 8:46 sēmeion “sign,” miraculous sign “miracle” Luke 23:8; John 2:11, 23; 3:2; 4:54; 6:2, 14; 9:16; 10:41; 11:47; 12:18, 37 John 20:30 “sign” ergon “work” “work” Matthew 11:2; John 5:20, 36; 7:21; 9:3; 10:25, 32; 14:10–11 Other Greek words used include endoxon, paradoxon, and thaumasion but never thauma or sēmeia kai terata. 2. The Symbolism of the Seven Miraculous Signs 8/24/2018 2 2. The Symbolism of the Seven Miraculous Signs 1 8/24/2018 Gospel Portrayals of Miracles • Mark (19 stories; 4 summaries; 1 report): Miracles as powerful deeds (dynameis) are the signs that Jesus is the Son of God • Miracles, rather than explicit teachings, open Jesus’ ministry (see Mark 1:21–45) • Marcan miracles are described in detail and very dramatically (remember this is the “Harry Potter gospel!”) • Matthew (21 stories; 10 summaries; 4 reports): Miracles are secondary to Jesus’ authoritative teaching • With the exception of a passing summary of healings (Matt 4:23–24), mention of specific miracles (Matt 8:1–17) is delayed until after the Sermon on the Mount (Matt 5–7) • Miracles are not portrayed so magically .
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing the Gospel of John
    Introducing the Gospel of John FPCF Christian Education January 2018 1. The Strange World of the Gospel of John 1. No birth narrative 2. No temptation 3. No baptism 4. Almost no 1. The Strange kingdom sayings World of the 5. No Parables Gospel of John 6. No Exorcisms 7. A jumbled timeline 8. Long teaching units, lengthy dialogue What in the world is The Gospel of John and who wrote this? 2. The Basics 1. Anonymous 2. Traditionally attributed to “John the Apostle”, the 2. The Basics son of Zebedee, known here as “the one whom Jesus Loved” 3. Dated between 90-110CE 4. Written probably within a Jewish Christian church trying to sever ties 2. The Basics with Judaism. (cont.) 5. Most likely, the last gospel to be written. 6. Written purposefully to be different. 3. Structure 1. Prologue (1:1-18) 2. Book of Signs (1:19-12:51) 3. Structure 3. Book of Glory (13:1-20:34) 4. Epilogue (21) The Prologue 1:1-18 1. An Ancient Christian Hymn 2. Connections to The Prologue “Genesis” 3. “THE LOGOS” 4. The Gospel in Summary The Book of Signs 1:19-12:50 The Book of 1. Seven Signs Signs 2. Seven Teachings 3. Seven I AM Sayings 1. Water into Wine 2. The Official’s Son 3. Healing of the Paralytic Seven Signs 4. Feeding of the 5000 5. Walking on Water 6. Man Born Blind 7. Raising of Lazarus 1. Nicodemus 2. Woman at the Well 3. On “The Sabbath” Seven Teachings 4. Bread of Life 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Wanted: Jesus of Nazareth Կը Փնտռուի Յիսուս Նազովրեցին
    Wanted: Jesus of Nazareth Կը Փնտռուի Յիսուս Նազովրեցին John 11: 45-57 John 12:1-11 Last Sunday badveli Kevin covered an important section from the Gospel of John, the resurrection of Lazarus. It is the last sign out of the seven signs that John recorded in his Gospel. Each sign is important, and each sign has its explanation (NIV commentary calls it “sign and explanation” or “miracle and discourse”). Signs are not enough to produce faith. People saw that Lazarus was risen and alive. Some believed in Jesus and some did not. Signs alone cannot provoke faith. Miracles do not of themselves transform lives. E.G. In the Gospel of Luke, there is the parable of the rich man and Lazarus (Luke 16). Both died. The rich man wanted help form Abraham. The rich man was not a believer, and he urged Abraham to warn his five brothers about what would happen after the end of life. Abraham said, “Let your brothers listen to Moses and the Prophets.” The rich man says, “No, let someone from dead go to them, and they will repent.” The Abraham’s reply is interesting: “If they do not listen to Moses and the prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.” This brings me to our passage: 45 Therefore many of the Jews who had come to visit Mary, and had seen what Jesus did, believed in him. 46 But some of them went to the Pharisees and told them what Jesus had done. 47 Then the chief priests and the Pharisees called a meeting of the Sanhedrin.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Gospel According to Luke
    Introduction to the Gospel according to John Where is it in the Bible? John is the fourth book in the New Testament and the last of the four Gospels. It is found between Luke and Acts. Who wrote it? According to John 21:20-24, this Gospel was based on the testimony of “the disciple whom Jesus loved.” This person is not identified, and, other than that vague description, the book itself does not say anything about its author. From the late second century, the belief in the Church was that this gospel had been written by John, the son of Zebedee. This has been questioned for many years and numerous proposals have been made regarding the identity of the “beloved disciple”; for example, Martin Luther thought it might have been Lazarus. Most scholars feel that the gospel was written by one of Jesus’ disciples, who might have been John. But in spite of the difficulties and questions, the traditional and most popular opinion is that the author was John. When was it written? Many scholars feel that the gospel that we have today is an edited version of the original. This makes it very difficult to date its composition. Most feel that it was completed during 90’s, not long after Matthew and Luke were written. What is it about? The Gospel itself says that it was written so that those who read or heard it “might believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God.” The prologue shows the place that the story of Jesus occupies in the wider history of salvation.
    [Show full text]
  • Donald Guthrie, "The Importance of Signs in the Fourth Gospel,"
    Donald Guthrie, “The Importance of Signs in the Fourth Gospel,” Vox Evangelica 5 (1967): 72-83. The Importance of Signs in the Fourth Gospel Donald Guthrie [p.72] The special use of the Greek word shme‹on in John is well known, but this study is intended to bring into focus several important aspects of ‘signs’ as a major contribution to the purpose for which the Gospel was written. It makes good sense to begin with John’s own statement of purpose in xx. 30, 31, although this is the final occurrence of the word in the Gospel. There are several important implications to be drawn from this statement. (a) John’s account of the signs which Jesus did is intentionally selective. He mentions many other signs (poll¦ shme‹a) of which he must have had detailed knowledge. In fact, he is specifically referring to those performed in the presence of the disciples. They were observable phenomena which evidently possessed particular significance. Some indication of what that significance was is contained in the concluding half of the statement (verse 31). (b) The purpose of the selection was theological. The signs were designed to produce faith of a particular kind. The verb ‘believe’ (pisteÚw) is frequent in John, although the noun p…stij is lacking.1 It is important to note how often in this gospel believing is connected with seeing as well as hearing and this will be brought out in the course of our enquiry. (c) The theological purpose is stated in a twofold form―(i) that Jesus is the Christ and (ii) that He is the Son of God.
    [Show full text]