Honors Research Trip December 2008 By: Chelsea Robinson

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Honors Research Trip December 2008 By: Chelsea Robinson Honors Research Trip December 2008 By: Chelsea Robinson In December of 2008, five undergraduates traveled to Oahu with Dr. Thomas Gillespie as part of a research group studying the deciduous forests, continuing his study of this forest type on islands of the Pacific. The trip was centered on several re-vegetation sites on the island as well as invasive species removal. We removed non-natives and planted at a site within Koko Crater as well as in a backyard of a graduate student that was on state land. The group included Dr. Gillespie and five undergraduates who had all been in the course Geography 111, Forest Ecosystems, at UCLA. Tropical dry forests are among the most endangered ecosystems worldwide and the Hawaiian forests of this type are especially threatened. The island of Oahu once was inhabited by many endemic and native species but has suffered an exceptional loss of habitat, primarily due to colonial powers. The islands were colonized by two separate powers, by the Polynesians around 300 BC and by the British Captain Cook in 1778. More than 25% of the endangered plant taxa in the entire Hawaiian flora are from dry forest or dry scrub ecosystems and approximately 20% of taxa from these habitats are known to be extinct (Sakai et al. 2002). Despite its extremely endangered status, this ecosystem has been studied very little and there is a lack of information regarding the feasibility of reforestation of native vegetation. With more than 98% of the original forest extent removed, it is important that Hawaiian tropical dry forests Clearing invasive species from Diamond Head receive more attention to begin the re-introduction of native flora. We arrived the evening of December 12, to our first Hawaiian rainstorm. Because we arrived late at night, we could not begin our research work until the following day. Instead, we checked into our hotel and got some rest. On Saturday, 12/13, we went to different botanical gardens around the island of Oahu. The first place we visited was the Foster‟s Botanical Garden. While many of the plants there were unique and beautiful, we had a hard time finding any natives! Finally we found several trees from the native genera Pritchardia. The next botanical garden we visited was Lili'uokali botanic garden. This garden had many different native species, including several of the species I had Diospyros sandwicensis previously ordered for my study site, including Lama (Diospyros sandwicensis), Naio (Myoporum sandwicensis), and two species of native hibiscus. While these native plants were planted and did not occur unassisted at this site, they were still some of the only natives we saw that day. Next, we tried to visit the Lyon Arboretum, managed by the University of Hawaii at Manoa. However, while it had only been Myoporum sandwicensis sprinkling that morning, as we made our way up the hill to the arboretum it began to pour. We stopped in the visitor office, and we talked to the man who worked there, who said they closed in under 10 minutes! We were able to do a quick trip through the start of the arboretum, but we did not get to explore too much. The trails were narrow and steep and with the rain were slightly precarious. After spending the morning visiting various botanical gardens, we stopped at the National Memorial Cemetery found in the Punchbowl crater. Here we were able to see down the outside 2 of the crater on the dry side, where dry forest would naturally occur. Instead, we saw a lot of invasive Leucaena leucocephala, also known as haole koa, which we ended up seeing much more on the trip at different sites. This species, native to Mexico, is particularly invasive because it can grow quickly into dense thickets which crowd out native vegetation. As we left Punchbowl Crater, we decided to head to Koko Crater to look for a suitable site for my native revegetation project. On our way, we saw some street vendors selling Filipino and Hawaiian food. We jumped at the chance to try roadside native food, so we stopped. We received pork adobo with rice and macaroni salad for the Filipino food, and green squid mush, glass noodles, salmon salad, and pudding for the Hawaiian food. We all thought it was pretty tasty, until a few hours later, we all became a little nauseated. We then continued on our way to Koko crater. The rain had eased up, luckily, so we began on the easy hike through the crater. Our luck with the weather, however, turned sour 30 minutes into our hike. We were able to experience our first true tropical storm in the best way ever- in shorts and sandals! We had not quite found the place to plant for my study yet, so we continued on our way, walking almost 45 minutes in the rain. On Sunday, 12/14, the Honolulu marathon was conducted right outside our hotel. While exciting, it meant there was no way possible to take a car out for the day to explore other sites. Instead, we decided to hike to the Diamond Head crater, the symbol of Oahu. We were staying relatively close to the site. Before heading into the visitor area in the interior of the crater, we scouted some possible re-vegetation sites on the Dr. Gillespie on the outer outside of the crater. We found some suitable spots that looked like rim of Diamond Head 3 they might have once been a riparian area, near a stream. After doing some scouting, we continued our hike around the exterior of Diamond Head to the tunnel which allows entry to the interior of the crater. Once inside, there are informational signs discussing the history of the crater as a military base, the formation of the carter, and the fauna we would expect to see on the hike to the peak. The hike from the base to the peak was 1.6 miles round-trip. The hike up allowed us to see many non-native plants, including haole koa and buffalo grass. Both of these invasives covered the interior and exterior of the crater. Diamond Head crater was used as a restricted military reservation from 1906 to 1976. In 1976, a portion or the interior of the crater was opened for recreational use, and one trail up to the peak was opened. Over a million visitors each year come to hike up the old military trail to the peak, where a military bunker still sits. While the public is allowed in some of the crater, much of it is off limits. The restricted areas are used by Civil Defense, FAA, and Hawaii National Guard. Diamond Head was declared a National Monument in 1968. Monday December 15, we met with Matt Schirman, the owner of the Hui Ku Maoli Ola native plant nursery on the windward side of the island. I had previously corresponded with him through email and had ordered about 100 native plants for our re-vegetation purposes. At his nursery, we saw more native Hui Ku Maoli Ola Nursery Hawaiian plants together than the rest of the trip. After Matt showed us around the native plants he was growing, he took us to a 20-acre plot he had recently purchased adjacent to his nursery. He was calling it the “Papa hana Kuola” 4 and was converting it to a cultural center. They were fortunate enough to have a natural spring that even had fish living in it, with water fresh enough to drink. With the water from this spring, Matt was planting Taro plants there as a cultural education center. While not a plant native to Hawaii, Taro is considered naturalized as it was introduced by the Polynesians around 300 BC. We settled on picking up some of our ordered plants the folowing day since we had a meeting to get to. We had an appointment to meet with the Park Coordinator for the Diamond Head state monument, named Yara Lamdrid-Rose. We were hoping to get her permission to have a re- vegetation site for our project within the crater. Yara had a very pessimistic view of our chances with a site there, as many projects have failed in the past. She explained to us that many fail without proper maintenance in the long term. She also drove us through several restricted areas to show us past failed projects. One of the „failed‟ sites still had a good population of several native species, including Gossypium tomentosum, also known as Mao and Hawaiian native cotton. While she did not allow us to begin a new re-vegetation project there, she did eventually agree to letting us clear the invading grasses and haole koa of the site with native cotton, so we spent Wednesday there. The following day, we decided on planting for the project at the Koko crater site. We picked up 30 plants from Matt‟s nursery: Diospyros sandwicensis – Lama 8 plants Myoporum sandwicensis – Naio 5 plants Hibiscus brackenridgei – Ma‟o hau hele – 5 plants Psydrax odorata - Alahe'e 7 plants Reynoldsia sandwicensis – Ohe 5 plants Koko Crater Study Site 5 We decided on a site within the Koko crater that was on a slope near a ravine, with plenty of soil and shade. Native species were growing nearby including Wiliwili, Lama, and several native hibiscus species. From the direction and incline of the slope, we determined which side would be moister. The plants that we had that did better in moister soil were the Diospyros and the Psydrax. In contrast, the plants that needed drier soil were the Reynoldsia, Myoporum, and Hibiscus brackenridgei.
Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment
    PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A, NORTH KONA, HAWAII Prepared by: Jon G. Giffin Forestry & Wildlife Manager August 2003 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. ii GENERAL SETTING...................................................................................................................1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 Land Use Practices...............................................................................................................1 Geology..................................................................................................................................3 Lava Flows............................................................................................................................5 Lava Tubes ...........................................................................................................................5 Cinder Cones ........................................................................................................................7 Soils .......................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for Tyoj5llllt . I-Bland Plants
    Recovery Plan for tYOJ5llllt. i-bland Plants RECOVERY PLAN FOR MULTI-ISLAND PLANTS Published by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: Date: / / As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most ofour nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use ofour land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values ofour national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interests ofall our people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island Territories under U.S. administration. DISCLAIMER PAGE Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance ofrecovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Costs indicated for task implementation and/or time for achievement ofrecovery are only estimates and are subject to change. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval ofany individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, otherthan the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position ofthe U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Relationships in Afro-Malagasy Schefflera (Araliaceae) Based on Nuclear and Plastid Markers
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2010 Evolutionary relationships in Afro-Malagasy Schefflera (Araliaceae) based on nuclear and plastid markers Morgan Gostel Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/122 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Morgan Robert Gostel 2010 All Rights Reserved ii EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIPS IN AFRO-MALAGASY SCHEFFLERA (ARALIACEAE) BASED ON NUCLEAR AND PLASTID MARKERS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of M.S. Biology at Virginia Commonwealth University. by MORGAN ROBERT GOSTEL B.S. Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University, 2008 Director: DR. GREGORY M. PLUNKETT AFFILIATE RESEARCH PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY, VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY AND DIRECTOR, CULLMAN PROGRAM FOR MOLECULAR SYSTEMATICS, THE NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN Co-Director: DR. RODNEY J. DYER ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia July 2010 iii Acknowledgements I have been tremendously fortunate in my life to be taught by truly gifted teachers – assets that are simultaneously the most important and undervalued in our world. I would like to extend my deepest gratitude to my friend and advisor, Dr. Gregory M. Plunkett, who has taught me that patience and diligence together with enthusiasm are necessary to pursue what we are most passionate about and who has provided me with the most exciting opportunities in my life.
    [Show full text]
  • Replacement of Reynoldsia Qiu & Bouché, 1998 (Preocc.) With
    Replacement of Reynoldsia Qiu & Bouché, 1998 (preocc.) with Norealidys Blakemore, 2008 (Oligochaeta : Lumbricidae) by R.J. Blakemore c/- YNU, Yokohama, Japan [date:- 12 th February, 2008 ] Under ICZN (1999: Art. 52-54, 60), a new substitute anagrammatic genus-group name, Norealidys Blakemore, 2008: 1 (nom. nov. ), is herein provided for the primary homonym Reynoldsia Qiu & Bouché, 1998: 102 (Oligochaeta : Lumbricidae) [non Malloch, 1934: 230 (Diptera : Muscidae)]. Its feminine gender is retained to comply with type (and only currently know species), Reynoldsia andaluciana Qiu & Bouché, 1998: 103 that now becomes Norealidys andaluciana (Qiu & Bouché, 1998) (comb. nov .) [misspelt “ andalousia ” by Bouché et al. , (2004: 386)]. Note: the botanical genus “Reynoldsia ” of flowering plant family Araiaceae is not homonymous. Previously, Blakemore (2006; 2007: pages 5, 60) formally noted replacement was required for Reynoldsia Qiu & Bouché, 1998 [misspelt as “Reynodsia ” by Qiu & Bouché (1998: 1) and as “Reynolsia ” by Qiu & Bouché (1998: 2) – both “incorrect original spellings” since stated to be a patronym for Dr J. Reynolds, therefore “ Reynoldsia ” as per Qiu & Bouché (1998: 102)]. Dr Cs. Csuzdi (21.x.2005 pers. comm.) notified Dr M. Bouché this genus name was preoccupied, and the current author made further contact attempts, but no response has been forthcoming from the original authors and the name is not known to have been replaced nor validated until now. Under ICZN (1999: Art. 8.6) a permanent and public record is provided with intention to provide identical copies and to deposit the current work in CD-ROM format [dated as above], not least in the publicly accessible libraries of institutions listed below:- 1/.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Inventory of the Proposed Ta'u Unit of the National Park of American Samoa
    Cooperative Natiad Park Resou~cesStudies Unit University of Hawaii at Manoa Department of Botany 3 190 Made Way Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 (808) 956-8218 Technical Report 83 BOTANICAL INVENTORY OF THE PROPOSED TA'U UNIT OF THE NATIONAL PARK OF AMERICAN SAMOA Dr. W. Arthur Whistler University of Hawai'i , and National Tropical Botanical Garden Lawai, Kaua'i, Hawai'i NatidPark Swice Honolulu, Hawai'i CA8034-2-1 February 1992 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author would like to thank Tim Motley. Clyde Imada, RdyWalker. Wi. Char. Patti Welton and Gail Murakami for their help during the field research catried out in December of 1990 and January of 1991. He would also like to thank Bi Sykes of the D.S.I.R. in Chtistchurch, New Zealand. fur reviewing parts of the manuscript, and Rick Davis and Tala Fautanu fur their help with the logistics during the field work. This research was supported under a coopemtive agreement (CA8034-2-0001) between the University of Hawaii at Man08 and the National Park !&mice . TABLE OF CONTENTS I . INTRODUCTION (1) The Geography ...........................................................................................................1 (2) The Climate .................................................................................................................1 (3) The Geology............................................................................................................... 1 (4) Floristic Studies on Ta'u .............................................................................................2 (5) Vegetation
    [Show full text]
  • Flowering Plants of Samoa
    FLOWERING PLANTS OF SAMOA BY ERLING CHRISTOPHERSEN HONOLULU, HAWAII PUBLISHEDBY THE MUSEUM February 21, 1935 KRAUS REPRINT CO. New York 1971 CONTENTS PAGS Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Mono~otyledon~ae.......................................................................................................................... 6 Family 1. Pandanaceae ........................................................................................................ 6 Family 2. Hydrocharitaceae 6 Family 3. Gramineae ............................................................................................................ 6 Family 4. Cyperageae .......................................................................................................... 15 Family 5. Palmae .................................................................................................................. 25 Family 6- Araceae ................................................................................................................ 39 Family 7. Lemnaceae ............................................................................................................ 44 Family 8. Flagellariaceae 44 Family g. Bromeliaceae ...................................................................................................... 47 Family lo. Commelinaceae .................................................................................................. 48 . Family
    [Show full text]
  • Honolulu, Hawaii 96822
    COOPERATNE NATIONAL PARK FEmFas SIUDIES UNIT UNIVERSI'IY OF -1 AT MANQA Departmerrt of Botany 3190 Maile Way Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 (808) 948-8218 --- --- 551-1247 IFIS) - - - - - - Cliffod W. Smith, Unit Director Professor of Botany ~echnicalReport 64 C!HECXLI:ST OF VASaTLAR mANIS OF HAWAII VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK Paul K. Higashino, Linda W. Cuddihy, Stephen J. Anderson, and Charles P. Stone August 1988 clacmiIST OF VASCULAR PLANrs OF HAWAII VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK The following checMist is a campilation of all previous lists of plants for Hawaii Volcanoes National Park (HAVO) since that published by Fagerlund and Mitchell (1944). Also included are observations not found in earlier lists. The current checklist contains names from Fagerlund and Mitchell (1944) , Fagerlund (1947), Stone (1959), Doty and Mueller-Dambois (1966), and Fosberg (1975), as well as listings taken fram collections in the Research Herbarium of HAVO and from studies of specific areas in the Park. The current existence in the Park of many of the listed taxa has not been confirmed (particularly ornamentals and ruderals). Plants listed by previous authors were generally accepted and included even if their location in HAVO is unknown to the present authors. Exceptions are a few native species erroneously included on previous HAVO checklists, but now known to be based on collections from elsewhere on the Island. Other omissions on the current list are plant names considered by St. John (1973) to be synonyms of other listed taxa. The most recent comprehensive vascular plant list for HAVO was done in 1966 (Ihty and Mueller-Dombois 1966). In the 22 years since then, changes in the Park boundaries as well as growth in botanical knowledge of the area have necessitated an updated checklist.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Araliaceae: a Phylogenetic Analysis Based on ITS Sequences of Nuclear Ribosomal DNA
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Lincoln University Research Archive Systematic Botany (2001), 26(1): pp. 144±167 q Copyright 2001 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists The Evolution of Araliaceae: A Phylogenetic Analysis Based on ITS Sequences of Nuclear Ribosomal DNA JUN WEN Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Current address: Department of Botany, Field Museum of Natural History, Roosevelt Rd at Lake Shore Dr., Chicago, Illinois 60605-2496 GREGORY M. PLUNKETT Department of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23284-2012 ANTHONY D. MITCHELL Ecology and Entomology Group, Soil, Plant and Ecological Sciences Division, PO Box 84, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand STEVEN J. WAGSTAFF Landcare Research, P.O. Box 69, Lincoln 8152, New Zealand Communicating Editor: Alan Whittemore ABSTRACT. Phylogenetic analyses of ITS sequence data from 70 species and 40 genera of Araliaceae (representing all major lineages within the ``core group'' of the family) do not support the widely used traditional division of Araliaceae into three tribes. Tribe Aralieae (characterized by imbricate petals) is found nested within a paraphyletic Schef¯erieae (whose taxa have valvate petals). There are, however, two large monophyletic groups comprising most araliad genera: the ''Aralia-Polyscias-Pseudopanax group'' (which in- cludes Aralia, Meryta, Munroidendron, Panax, Pentapanax, Polyscias, Pseudopanax, Reynoldsia, Sciadodendron, Tetra- plasandra, and their close allies), and the ''Eleutherococcus-Dendropanax-Schef¯era group'' (including Brassaiopsis, Dendropanax, Eleutherococcus, Fatsia, Hedera, Oreopanax, Schef¯era, Sinopanax, and their close allies). The ITS trees also permit a re-evaluation of several taxonomically important morphological characters (e.g., petal aestivation, leaf architecture, carpel number, and habit), and provide the opportunity to assess traditional generic delimitations in the family.
    [Show full text]
  • Reynoldsia Sandwicensis Gray the Soft Whitish Wood Is Not Presently Used
    Common Forest Trees of Hawaii (Native and Introduced) 5 ‘Ohe makai, Fruits (berries) rounded about ⁄16 inch (8 mm) in Hawaiian reynoldsia diameter, with stigmas at apex, purplish, juicy, bitter, becoming dry with ridges. Seeds (nutlets) 10 or fewer, 3 elliptical, flattened, ⁄16 inch (5 mm) long. Reynoldsia sandwicensis Gray The soft whitish wood is not presently used. The Hawaiians made stilts from it for a game. The resin or Ginseng or aralia family (Araliaceae) gum was also used. Scattered in dry lowland areas, especially aa or rough Native species (endemic) lava fields, to 2600 ft (792 m) elevation; becoming rare. This distinctive deciduous tree of dry forests is easily Special areas recognized by its stout smooth, light gray trunk with Waimea Arboretum, Wahiawa, Volcanoes. spreading crown of stout crooked branches, clear yel- low brown tasteless resin, and large pinnate leaves with Champion 7–11 ovate wavy margined leaflets heart-shaped at base. Height 48 ft (14.6 m), c.b.h. 6.7 ft (2 m), spread 23 ft (7 Also, many small greenish flowers in large branched m). Puuwaawaa, Kailua-Kona, Hawaii (1968). clusters are conspicuous mostly in early spring while the tree is leafless. Range A tree 15–50 ft (4.6–15 m) high with stout trunk This genus is found on Niihau, Oahu, Molokai, Lanai, 1 1 ⁄2–2 ft (0.5–0.6 m) in diameter, leafless from late fall Maui, and Hawaii, but is absent from Kauai. until after spring rains. Bark light gray, smooth, becom- ing slightly warty and fissured. Inner bark light brown Other common names or whitish streaked, slightly bitter, yielding yellow brown ‘ohe-kukuluae‘o, ‘ohe tasteless gum.
    [Show full text]
  • Tetraplasandra Lydgatei (Araliaceae): Taxonomic Recognition of a Rare, Endemic Species from O'ahu, Hawaiian Islands1
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarSpace at University of Hawai'i at Manoa Tetraplasandra lydgatei (Araliaceae): Taxonomic Recognition of a Rare, Endemic Species from O‘ahu, Hawaiian Islands1 Timothy J. Motley2 Abstract: Tetraplasandra is a genus of seven species endemic to the Hawaiian Archipelago. Recent field studies in the Ko‘olau Mountains on the island of O‘ahu have led to a taxonomic reevaluation of a rare species, Tetraplasandra lydgatei. The species, originally described in the late 1800s, was placed into the widespread, polymorphic species T. oahuensis in a subsequent treatment of the genus. Several morphological characters and varying ecological habitats distin- guish the two species. Based on these differences T. lydgatei deserves formal taxonomic recognition. Furthermore, T. lydgatei was an uncommon species even when it was originally described. This may be due to the early human alteration of the dry and mesic Hawaiian forests for housing and agriculture and also that the species was always only an occasional component of the mesic ecosystem. Regardless of the reasons, the rarity of this species has been accelerated. Cur- rently, only six individuals of T. lydgatei are known to exist, and conservation efforts to protect it are needed. The Hawaiian endemic genus Tetrapla- in which many of the more than 82 species, sandra A. Gray as currently circumscribed subspecies, and varieties described in, and contains seven species (Lowry 1990, Lowry subsequent to, Sherff’s (1955) revision of the and Wood 2000). Tetraplasandra lydgatei genus were synonymized. However, extensive (Hillebr.) Harms was first described by Hill- field investigations by botanists John Obata ebrand (1888) as Triplasandra lydgatei; the and Ron Fenstemacher over many years have genus Triplasandra Seem.
    [Show full text]
  • Maui County Planting Plan Third Edition
    MAUI COUNTY PLANTING PLAN THIRD EDITION Maui County Arborist Committee MAUI COUNTY PLANTING PLAN—THIRD EDITION IT’S ALL ABOUT SHADE! UH Maui College Science Parking Lot, E. H. Rezents photograph, taken January 2011. This document has been researched, written and coordinated for the Maui County Arborist Committee By Ernest H. Rezents Professor Emeritus Agriculture, University of Hawaii Maui College Certified Arborist, International Society of Arboriculture Registered Consulting Arborist, American Society of Consulting Arborists September 1, 1991, First Edition July 20, 1994, Second Edition December 2000, Second Edition Reprinted March 9, 2016, Third Edition Maui County Planting Plan—Third Edition MAUI COUNTY ARBORIST COMMITTEE – 2016 Kimberly Thayer, Chair Heather A. K. Heath, Vice Chair Jackie Brainard Casey A. Foster, ISA* Certified Arborist Alex Haller William G. Jacintho, ISA* Certified Arborist William R. Myrter Jean A. Pezzoli, PhD Chris Reynolds Ex-Officio Members Maui County Corporation Council Maui County Parks and Recreation Department Maui County Planning Department Maui County Public Works Department Maui County Water Department Maui County Arborist *International Society of Arboriculture Maui County Planting Plan—Third Edition MAYOR'S MESSAGE Maui County Planting Plan—Third Edition ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to thank the following individuals and organizations for their support and contributions that made possible the publication of the Maui County Planting Plan. Robert (Bob) Hobdy for his assistance with plant scientific names and characteristics, exceptional tree research, and the Maui County Island maps with planting zones. Philip Thomas, a former Database Administrator with the Hawaii Ecosystems at Risk project (HEAR), for assisting with plant database storage and formatting chapter tables.
    [Show full text]