<<

arXiv:2006.01123v1 [astro-ph.EP] 30 May 2020 eua eoacscue ytegsdpein hl semi- while depletion, gas the by caused resonances secular lntsml.Hwvr h rgno ihobtlinclina orbital high of cond origin different the under However, collision planetesimals. planetesimal of process the 2 1 yr 3 a nteSlrNbl.A ne deo h a a oigout moving was gas the of edge inner An Nebula. Solar the in gas Ida & Tanaka impacts. t hyper-velocity hi indicates under MBAs have inclination inclination orbital orbital high for high distribution a as with 2.0 th MBAs than that between shallower considered be was MBAs) to (hereafter derived main-belt were asteroids or Itoh the & high Takahashi Terai, of a most with asteroids of 656 axes imag detected optical they deep Telescope, and wide Subaru using By latitudes. ecliptic high Iwai Aya Inclination Orbital High a Main-Belt of Photometry and Optical Astrophys. Astron. in Research 4 5 eevd21 xxx;acpe 05xx xx xxxx 2015 accepted xx; xxxx 2015 Received seod ihahg ria nlnto r outlier. are inclination orbital high a with Asteroids INTRODUCTION 1 tp/wwrajunloghttp://www.iop.org/journa http://www.raa-journal.org − ihgih,Sy,Hoo6951,Japan; 679-5313, Hyogo Sayo, Astron Nishigaichi, for Center Observatory, Astronomical Nishi-Harima Tech Japan and 305-8563, Science Ibaraki Industrial Advanced of Institute National ainlAtooia bevtr fJpn 5 ot Aoho North 650 Japan, of Observatory Astronomical National ne-nvriyCnr o srnm n srpyis G Astrophysics, and Astronomy for Centre Inter-University eateto hsc,AsmUiest,Slhr7801 I 001, 788 Silchar University, Assam Physics, of Department 1 h iedsrbto fhg ria nlnto asteroid inclination orbital high of distribution size The twsrvae htteecnrct n nlnto fth of inclination and eccentricity the that revealed was It . e words: Jupit Key by t perturbated then within were formed and were Jupiter, and asteroids belt D-type main of the part a that consider Abstract -yeatris rcin fDtp seod are asteroids D-type of eig Fractions them, Among asteroids. 2.2 asteroids. D-type 38 m Hawaii of 2 types of spectral Astrophysics University the and termined the Astronomy Using for catalog. Centre Inter-University 4 selecte are SDSS-MOC They the orbit. highly-inclined in a have which of most anbl seod and asteroids main-belt 1 ociItoh Yoichi , ( 2000 ecridotlwrslto pia pcrsoyo 1ma 51 of spectroscopy optical low-resolution out carried We io lnt,atris eea ehius spectrosc techniques: — general asteroids: planets, minor acltdteobtleouino seod.Te consi They asteroids. of evolution orbital the calculated ) ( 2 2013 sysiTerai Tsuyoshi , 2015 on httecmltv iedsrbto ftehg orb high the of distribution size cumulative the that found ) 7 . 3 Vol. ± 2 X . 0 No. o ihobtliciainmi-etatris We asteroids. main-belt inclination orbital high for % 3 XX ajnGupta Ranjan , [email protected] 000–000 , ls/raa ea Itoh & Terai a ag oyhsahge irpiestrength disruptive higher a has body large a hat 3 tosfo hs flwobtlinclination orbital low of those from itions . inatrisi tl uncertain. still is asteroids tion stknwt urm-a one nthe on mounted Suprime-Cam with taken es to h o ria nlnto Bs tis It MBAs. inclination orbital low the of at 0 ao xso h seod i o change. not did asteroids the of axis major 4 hcliinlvlcte.Tesalwsize shallow The velocities. collisional gh rvdsu ihifrainregarding information with us provides s ooy --,Ueoo Tsukuba, Umezono, 1-1-1, nology, ± seod nrae u otemto of motion the to due increased asteroids e nskid ue4107 India 007, 411 Pune aneshkhind, m,Uiest fHoo 407-2, Hyogo, of University omy, ia nlnto.Teobtlsemi-major orbital The inclination. bital sk Sen Asoke , ndia 1 uPae ioHwi 62,USA 96720, Hawaii Hilo Place, ku . 1 rnmcluis(U n . AU. 3.3 and (AU) units tronomical tatriswr lsie as classified were asteroids ht candidates D-type the from d ada eoiyof velocity a at ward er. o o ria inclination orbital low for % ( 2011 eelpi einbetween region ecliptic he eecp nIda ede- we India, in telescope uvydsalatrisat asteroids small surveyed ) eecp n the and telescope m 5 u Takahashi Jun , opic nbl asteroids, in-belt ee h elto of depletion the dered A A R tlinclination ital 1 strophysics and stronomy sac in esearch × Nagasawa, with s 2 10 − 5 AU 2 A. Iwai and Y. Itoh

Ida & Makino (1993) investigated the orbital evolution of planetesimals near to a proto-planet. Their numerical simulations showed that the planetesimals moved inward or outward with increasing orbital inclinations and/or eccentricities due to the gravitational perturbation of the proto-planet. In this paper, we focus on D-type asteroids. D-type asteroids are abundant in the and main- belt population with the semi-major axis beyond ≃ 3 AU. Optical reflectance of the D-type asteroids increases significantly with . Such optical reflectance and low of the D-type - oids are similar to those of some nuclei. Many properties of the D-type asteroids, including its spatial distribution and optical reflectance, have been discussed in the context of cometary evolution and asteroid populations. Detail discussion on the D-type asteroids are found, e.g., in Fitzsimmons et al. (1994). We conducted low-resolution optical spectroscopy of main-belt asteroids. Most of these asteroids have a highly-inclined orbit and optical consistent with spectral type D. Comparison of D-type ratio in high and low inclination populations will help us to understand the formation and evolution pro- cess of high inclination asteroids. However, we cannot directly apply the D-type ratio from large volume photometric catalogs, e.g., the SDSS-MOC 4 catalog, because the classification using multi- pho- tometry is not certain (Carvano et al. 2010, DeMeo & Carry 2013, DeMeo & Carry 2014). Therefore we carried out the spectroscopic observations of confirming the D-type candidates and estimating the real D-type ratio. Hereafter we define low orbital inclination MBAs as the asteroids with the semi-major axis between 2.1 AU and 3.3 AU and with the inclination less than 10 ◦, and high orbital inclination MBAs as the asteroids with the same semi-major axis range with the inclination equal to or larger than 10 ◦.

2 OBSERVATIONS

We carried out low-resolution optical spectroscopy of MBAs using the Wide Field Grism Spectrograph 2 (WFGS2) mounted on the University of Hawaii (UH) 2.2 m telescope. The data were obtained on October30 and 31, 2008and October19 and 20, 2011with the low-dispersiongrism 1 and the 1′′. 4 width slit. These instrument settings achieved a coverageof 440 – 830 nm and a spectral resolution of ∼ 410 at 650 nm. Slit orientations have been fixed in the north-south direction. The telescope was operated in the non-sidereal tracking mode. The integration time for each object was between 180 s and 600 s. Facilities of Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics (IUCAA) were also used. We employed the IUCAA Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera (IFOSC) mounted on the 2 m telescope at the IUCAA Girawali Observatory (IGO), India. The data were obtained on December 28 and 29, 2008 with the IFOSC 5 grism and the 1′′. 5 width slit. The wavelength coverage was 520 – 1030 nm with a spectral resolution of ∼ 650 at 650 nm. Slit orientations have been fixed in the north-south direction. The telescope was operated in the non-sidereal tracking mode. The integration time for each object was between 300 s and 600 s. Several criteria were used to select the targets. First, we selected asteroids with an orbital semi- major axis of between 2.1 AU and 3.3 AU, and with an orbital inclination greater than 10 ◦. We selected high orbital inclination asteroids because lack of the high inclination samples in the previous studies. One may consider that definition of the high and low orbital inclination asteroids should be based on the ν6 resonance. Because the orbital inclination of the ν6 resonance varies with the semi-major axis, clas- sification based on the ν6 resonance may complicate the discussion on the selection bias of the targets. Instead, we simply define the high and low orbital inclination asteroids based on their inclinations. Most of the selected asteroids are listed in the SDSS-MOC 4 catalog and their optical magnitudes are given. We constructed an optical color-color diagram of the selected asteroids using the SDSS magnitudes, and classified those objects with g − r ≥ 0.5 mag and r − i ≥ 0.2 mag as candidates for D-type asteroids (Ivezic et al. 2001). Because we selected the targets on the gri color-color diagram, we considered the selection bias also on the gri color-color diagram (section 4). We were not able to completely fill the observing time whilst searching for D-type asteroids. Therefore, when we could not find any suitable candidates, we observed high orbital inclination as- teroids instead, even if their SDSS colors were unknown. As a result, we observed a total of 48 high Highly-Inclined Asteroids 3

orbital inclination asteroids. We also observed three low orbital inclination asteroids for reference. The optical spectra of dwarfs with a spectral type of G were also taken as spectral standards. After the observations of this work, DeMeo & Carry (2013) proposed a new method for the taxon- omy with using the SDSS g-,r-,i-, and z-band filters. They claimed that the asteroid types are identified with the gri slope and i − z color. The D-type asteroids are classified as the group with the reddest gri slope and the reddest i − z color. The targets in this paper were classified into the D-type, L-type, or the S-type with the large i − z magnitudes by the classification of DeMeo & Carry (2013). Efficiency of the discovery of the D-type asteroids would increase, if we used the classification method of DeMeo & Carry (2013). This will be attempted in future. Additional photometric observations were carried out on November 7, 8, and 9, 2012 with the Multiband Imager for Nayuta Telescope (MINT) mounted on the Nayuta Telescope at Nishi-Harima Observatory, Japan. We observed 4 asteroids whose SDSS magnitudes were unknown. We used SDSS g−, r−, and i−band filters. The field of view was 10 ′× 10 ′with a pixel scale of 0′′. 3. The full width at half maximum of the point spread functions was typically 2′′. 0or2′′. 5. The integration time was between 30 s and 600 s for each object. Since an asteroid rotates and its brightness may vary over time, we repeatedly observed an asteroid in the r−band. The objects we investigated are summarized in table 1. We reduced the spectroscopic data with the following steps: overscan subtraction, bias subtraction, flat fielding, removal of scattered caused by the telescope and/or the instrument, extraction of a spectrum, and wavelength calibration. For the wavelength calibration, we used the O I and Na I lines of the sky for the UH data, and the emission lines of the Ne-Ar lamp for the IUCAA data. The spectra of the asteroids were then divided by the dwarf spectra. Thus, the spectra indicate the reflectivity of the asteroid. The spectrum of each asteroid was normalized to unity at 550 nm. We reduced the photometric data with the following steps: overscan subtraction, bias subtraction, and flat fielding with twilight flat frames. We used aperture photometry to measure the fluxes of the asteroids and several background stars imaged in the same. The aperture radius varied between 6 and 12 pixels, depending on the seeing size. Magnitudes of the asteroid were calculated using relative photom- etry with those of the background stars (SDSS DR9 catalog; Ahn et al. 2012). We used IRAF packages for all data-processing.

3 RESULTS

Figure 1 shows the spectra of the asteroids and table 2 lists their magnitudes and colors. The signal-to- noise ratios of the spectra in wavelengths between 660 nm and 740 nm ranged from 20 to 350 with a median value of 60. Bus & Binzel (2002a) and Bus & Binzel (2002b) defined 26 . From the low-resolution optical spectra of thousands of asteroids, they calculated the average reflectivities of nine wavelength regions between 435 nm and 925 nm for each spectral type. We made temperate spectra of C-, S-, X-, D-, and V-type asteroids by interpolating the average reflectivities for each asteroid spectral type. The temperate spectra were then normalized to unity at 550 nm. The template spectrum of a C-type asteroid is almost constant, whereas the spectra of S-type and V-type asteroids peak at approximately 700 nm. The template spectrum of an X-type asteroid increases gradually with wavelength, and that of a D-type asteroid increases significantly with wavelength. Individual asteroid spectra differ even if the asteroids are classified into the same spectral type. The standard deviation of the spectra among the same spectral type of asteroids is approximately 0.02. We calculated the residuals between the observed spectra and five template spectra. We then assigned a spectral type to an asteroid if the residuals were at a minimum and were smaller than 0.07. As a result, we classified 38 asteroids; 9 asteroids were clas- sified as S-type, 16 as C-type, 5 as X-type, 8 as D-type, and none as V-type. Among them, the spectral types of six asteroids have been previously assigned in Bus & Binzel (2002b) and the spectral type of one asteroid was assigned in Lazzaro et al. (2004). The spectral-type assignments in this work are consistent with the previous assignments for 6 assignments out of 7 assignments. Carvano et al. (2010) assigned spectral types for 63468 asteroids based on the SDSS photometric data. Among them, 22019 asteroids have two or more observations. Of these, 14962 show taxonomic variations. They employed 9 4 A. Iwai and Y. Itoh

Table 1 Targets and Assigned Spectral Type Asteroid number a [AU] i [◦] APmag∐ UT Date sec z Ref. star (sec z) Telescope Spectral Type this work previous work 171 3.13 2.55 13.61 2008/10/31 1.07 SAO 128811 (1.08) UH C C† 556 2.46 5.24 12.56 2008/10/31 1.03 SAO 75211 (1.00) UH S S† 729 2.76 18.00 14.27 2011/10/20 1.07 SAO 111802 (1.03) UH D D† 1241 3.19 23.55 14.53 2008/11/01 1.16 SAO 109922 (1.04) UH C 1264 2.86 25.00 14.09 2008/12/28 1.66 SAO 41806 (1.74) IUCAA C C† 1266 3.37 17.10 14.59 2011/10/20 1.03 SAO 75098 (1.03) UH D D‡ 1406 2.70 12.40 14.88 2011/10/21 1.09 SAO 145806 (1.19) UH Ld† 2023 2.88 22.40 14.80 2011/10/21 1.15 SAO 38934 (1.12) UH X 3139 3.20 20.53 15.52 2008/11/01 1.18 SAO 73774 (1.30) UH C C‡ 3346 3.19 21.50 15.60 2008/11/01 1.11 SAO 109922 (1.04) UH C 4423 3.39 19.30 16.80 2008/11/01 1.26 SAO 111908 (1.25) UH D B† 5222 2.77 34.58 15.69 2008/11/01 1.39 SAO 111908 (1.25) UH C 5889 3.05 19.18 16.88 2008/11/01 1.12 SAO 130080 (1.07) UH X 6052 3.24 21.70 15.88 2008/12/29 1.80 SAO 115381 (1.32) IUCAA C 6148 2.28 22.70 17.77 2011/10/21 1.12 SAO 145806 (1.19) UH 7290 2.56 24.76 15.13 2008/11/01 1.02 SAO 109922 (1.04) UH C 7331 3.12 22.35 15.88 2008/10/31 1.08 SAO 75211 (1.00) UH 8250 3.13 17.05 16.60 2008/11/01 1.10 SAO 109922 (1.04) UH S 8882 2.36 23.10 16.24 2011/10/21 1.13 SAO 145806 (1.19) UH D 13617 2.65 22.10 17.56 2011/10/21 1.23 SAO 38934 (1.12) UH S 13810 3.15 17.04 16.81 2008/11/01 1.06 SAO 130080 (1.07) UH D 15213 3.14 21.54 17.50 2008/10/31 1.11 SAO 93158 (1.08) UH C 15410 3.11 17.15 16.91 2008/11/01 1.26 SAO 111908 (1.25) UH C 15976 2.98 10.00 16.94 2011/10/20 1.03 SAO 75098 (1.03) UH S 17435 2.37 22.10 17.58 2011/10/21 1.44 SAO 130166 (1.52) UH 21552 2.60 22.10 17.34 2011/10/21 1.24 SAO 130166 (1.52) UH 25572 2.59 22.90 17.00 2011/10/20 1.08 SAO 111802 (1.03) UH S 25850 3.12 17.65 16.90 2008/11/01 1.10 SAO 130080 (1.07) UH D 26571 2.79 15.20 17.47 2011/10/20 1.42 SAO 75098 (1.03) UH 33750 2.80 32.70 17.15 2008/10/31 1.15 SAO 128811 (1.08) UH C 37977 3.13 20.17 15.84 2011/10/21 1.11 SAO 145806 (1.19) UH D 43142 2.59 14.40 16.13 2011/10/21 1.22 SAO 147902 (1.27) UH S 43815 3.17 24.11 15.23 2008/11/01 1.08 SAO 109922 (1.04) UH X 44215 2.58 12.40 17.22 2011/10/20 1.03 SAO 75098 (1.03) UH 45411 2.63 12.10 16.56 2011/10/21 1.16 SAO 38934 (1.12) UH S 46564 3.19 17.17 17.05 2008/10/31 1.12 SAO 128811 (1.08) UH X 47334 2.63 13.80 16.28 2011/10/20 1.04 SAO 75098 (1.03) UH 49591 3.22 17.68 16.40 2008/11/01 1.05 SAO 109922 (1.04) UH C 54750 3.22 17.26 16.85 2008/11/01 1.25 SAO 111908 (1.25) UH C 57036 2.34 23.80 17.76 2011/10/20 1.22 SAO 111802 (1.27) UH S 64969 2.29 24.30 16.28 2011/10/21 1.30 SAO 145806 (1.19) UH D 70104 3.17 22.95 16.70 2008/11/01 1.31 SAO 111908 (1.25) UH S 73506 3.20 18.33 16.69 2008/10/31 1.10 SAO 93158 (1.08) UH classes for the spectral assignments, and found the transition between dissimilar classes, e.g., D to S, X to S, X to S, and C to S. They proposed extreme space weathering, contamination by metal, the coexis- tence of different mineralogies in the same body, or phase reddening. We consider that one inconsistent assignment between this work and the previousstudy may be attributed to inhomogeneity of the asteroid surface, or ambiguity on the assignments.

4 DISCUSSION

We discuss the spatial distribution of D-type asteroids. D-type asteroids are abundant in the ecliptic plane between the main belt and the orbit of Jupiter (∼ 50%, DeMeo & Carry 2013). The number of asteroids that have been categorized as spectral type D is too small for a statistical discussion of the spa- Highly-Inclined Asteroids 5

Asteroid number a [AU] i [◦] APmag∐ UT Date secz Ref. star (sec z) Telescope Spectral Type this work previous work 93751 2.37 25.60 16.48 2011/10/21 1.37 SAO 148719 (1.22) UH 94030 2.61 28.05 16.60 2008/10/31 1.06 SAO 75211 (1.00) UH C 99202 3.20 22.24 17.02 2008/11/01 1.07 SAO 130080 (1.07) UH C 163943 2.53 17.30 18.05 2011/10/21 1.21 SAO 148719 (1.22) UH 193488 2.58 20.36 16.48 2008/11/01 1.11 SAO 75874 (1.07) UH 198575 2.66 29.47 17.16 2008/10/31 1.03 SAO 75211 (1.00) UH C 213177 2.38 24.20 17.80 2011/10/20 1.02 SAO 75438 (1.00) UH 307783 3.09 17.73 16.54 2008/11/01 1.07 SAO 109922 (1.04) UH X

∐: APmag is calculated on the JPL small body Database browser. †: Bus & Binzel (2002b) ‡: Lazzaro et al. (2004)

Table 2 Magnitudes and colors of the Asteroids Asteroid number g-mag g − r [mag] r − i [mag] 729 15.55±0.07 0.89±0.09 0.19±0.09 5222 16.54±0.04 0.75±0.10 −0.04 ± 0.06 7290 17.40±0.05 0.54±0.07 0.17±0.07 94030 17.88±0.09 0.53±0.13 0.15±0.08

tial distribution of these asteroids. We used photometric data from the SDSS-MOC4 catalog, as well as the results of the spectroscopic studies (Bus & Binzel 2002b, Lazzaro et al. 2004, this work). Because the selection of our targets was based on the color-color diagram, we carefully combined the photomet- ric studies and the spectroscopic studies against the selection bias. In the SDSS-MOC4 catalog, 67,921 low orbital inclination MBAs are listed and 31,400 high orbital inclination MBAs are listed (Table 3). Ivezic et al. (2001) claimed that the SDSS g − r and r − i colors could be used to classify the spectral types of asteroids. We defined candidates for D-type asteroids as the objects with g − r ≥ 0.5 mag and r − i ≥ 0.2 mag. A total of 26,261 low orbital inclination MBAs and 11,786 high orbital inclina- tion MBAs have been identified as D-type candidates. Among them, optical spectra of 103 low orbital inclination candidates and 67 high orbital inclination candidates have been obtained (Bus & Binzel 2002b, Lazzaro et al. 2004, this work). Eight and thirteen objects were spectroscopically assigned as D-type for low orbital inclination candidates and high orbital inclination candidates, respectively. We calculated the fraction of D-type asteroids. For low orbital inclination MBAs, the fraction of D-type asteroids is (26, 261/67, 921) · (8/103) = 3.0 ± 1.1%. For high orbital inclination MBAs, the fraction is (11, 786/31, 400) · (13/67) = 7.3 ± 2.0%. In this calculation, the uncertainty of the D-type fraction is controversial. The uncertainty involves ambiguity of taxonomy, accuracy of the orbital inclination, and many other factors. We do not fully examine these factors. Instead, we simply took square root of the number of the asteroids as the uncertainty of the number of the asteroids. We conclude that the frac- tion of D-type asteroids is higher in the high orbital inclination MBAs than in the low orbital inclination MBAs. D-type asteroids are abundant in the ecliptic plane between the main belt and the orbit of Jupiter. We propose that a number of D-type asteroids were formed near to the ecliptic plane between the main belt and the orbit of Jupiter, and that a part of D-type asteroids then migrated inward via gravitational scattering by Jupiter and gained a high inclination orbit. One may consider whether the D-type fraction changes if we apply the D-type candidates criteria of DeMeo & Carry (2013) to our targets. However, we selected the targets based on the gri color-color diagram following Ivezic et al. (2001). Among our targets, only 4 asteroids match the D-type criteria of DeMeo & Carry (2013). This small number of the sample prevent us from statistical discussion on the spatial distribution of the D-type asteroids. DeMeo & Carry (2013) deduced that the D-type mass ratio in the main-belt is ∼ 2%, or ∼ 4.4% if the largest four asteroids are removed. The D-type number ratio in the main-belt deduced in this work is ∼ 4%, if combining the high inclination and low inclination samples. This ratio seems consistent with DeMeo and Carry result of 4.4 % of mass in the main-belt belong to the D-type asteroids. However, 6 A. Iwai and Y. Itoh

Fig. 1 Optical spectra of the high orbital inclination asteroids. The reflectance are normal- ized to unity at 550 nm. Asteroids 171, 556, and 15123 are low orbital inclination asteroids. Spike patterns appear in the spectra are artifacts due to telluric absorptions and photospheric absorptions of the standard stars.

DeMeo & Carry (2013) assumed that the D-type asteroids have bulk density of 1 g cm−3, roughly half of the density of the S- and C-type asteroids. Therefore, one may think that the D-type asteroids number ratio should be ∼ 8%, which is higher than the result that this work presents. DeMeo & Carry (2013) calculate an average albedo of each asteroid type. We noticed that the albedo of the D-type asteroids is low among all types and that they have very low albedo especially in the short wavelengths in the optical. This low reflectivity may cause the inconsistency between the number ratio and the mass ratio. We consider the false-negative rate of the broad-band photometry D-type selection. For the low orbital inclination asteroids in the SDSS MOC 4 catalog, 41660 asteroids were not selected as the D-type candidates, based on the color-color diagram. Among this sample, 3281 asteroids are actually classified as the D-type asteroids, according to the classification of DeMeo & Carry (2013). Thus, the Highly-Inclined Asteroids 7

Fig. 1 continued false-negative rate is (3281/41660) = 7.9%, and the ”true” D-type fraction of the low orbital inclination asteroids is (26261/67921)(8/103)+(41660/67921)*7.9%= 7.8%. In the same manner, the false-negative rate of the high orbital inclination asteroids is 1752/(31400-11786) = 8.9%, and the ”true” D-type frac- tion is (11786/31400)(17/63)+(19614/31400)*8.9% = 12.8%. The false-negative rates are high, so that the rates may effect the results. However, because the false-negative rates for the low orbital inclination asteroids and the high orbital inclination asteroids are similar, we think that the result of higher D-type ratio in the high orbital inclination asteroids is still hold. We next investigated the spatial distribution of C-type asteroids. C-type asteroids with a low orbital inclination are mainly distributed in the outer part of the main belt (a > 2.5 AU). If C-type asteroids were also perturbed by Jupiter, a fraction of the C-type asteroids should also have moved inward and acquired a high inclination. We calculated the fraction of C-type asteroids with a semi-major axis be- tween 2.1 AU and 2.5 AU. The spectral classifications of Bus & Binzel (2002b) and Lazzaro et al. (2004) were used. Spectral types were assigned to 438 asteroids with a low orbital inclination and 131 8 A. Iwai and Y. Itoh

Fig. 1 continued

asteroids with a high orbital inclination. Among them, 46 low orbital inclination asteroids and 20 high orbital inclination asteroids were classified as C-type asteroids. For simplicity, B-type asteroids were also classified as C-type. For low orbital inclination asteroids with a semi-major axis of between 2.1 AU and 2.5 AU, the fraction of C-type asteroids is (61/438) = 13.9 ± 1.8%. For high orbital inclination as- teroids with a semi-major axis of between 2.1 AU and 2.5 AU, the fraction is (20/131) = 15.3 ± 3.4%. The difference in the fractions of C-type asteroids between the low orbital inclination asteroids and the high orbital inclination asteroids is not identified. We also calculated the fractions of the S-type asteroids. For the low orbital inclination asteroids with the semi-major axis between 2.1 AU and 2.5 AU, the fraction of the S-type asteroids is (273/438) = 62.3 ± 3.8%. For the high orbital inclination asteroids with the semi-major axis between 2.1 AU and 2.5 AU, the fraction of the S-type asteroids is (82/131) = 62.6 ± 6.9%. Difference between the low orbital inclination asteroids and the high orbital inclination asteroids is not identified also for the S-type Highly-Inclined Asteroids 9

Fig. 1 continued asteroids. We consider that the orbits of asteroids located far from Jupiter have not been significantly perturbed by Jupiter. Ida & Makino (1993) calculated the orbital evolution of planetesimals perturbed by a proto-planet. They indicated that planetesimals near the planet move with conserving Jacobi energy. The planetes- imal’s eccentricity and/or inclination increases once its semi-major axis increases or decreases. As a result, the planetesimals are distributed in a V-shape on the semi-major axis versus the (e2 + i2)1/2 (called the relative velocity) plane, with the apex of the V-shape located at the position of the proto- planet. The following studies extend numerical calculations of gravitational perturbation to the case of planetesimals with migrating planets (e.g. Gomes et al. 2005), or to the case of trans-Neptunian objects (e.g. Lykawka & Mukai 2008). It is considered that a protoplanetary disk still contains a large amount of gas during the early stages of planetary formation. Adachi, Hayashi & Nakazawa (1976) calculated the accretion time of planetesimals. They found that the accretion time of a 10 km-sized planetesimal onto the Sun exceeds 10 A. Iwai and Y. Itoh

Fig. 1 continued

109 yr. The radii of the asteroids observed in this work are estimated to be several tens of kilometers, with an average radius of 30 km. Thus, we consider that the gas drag in the protoplanetary disk did not significantly change the orbital semi-major axis of the asteroids. Figure 2 shows the inclination and eccentricity of asteroids as a function of the orbital semi-major axis. The D-type asteroids show two distinct distribution. One is the asteroids with the semi-major axis of 5.2 AU. Those objects are called Trojan asteroids, resonant asteroids to Jupiter. Another distribution is the D-type asteroids in the inner main-belt but with the high relative velocity. Carvano et al. (2010) classified asteroids based on the SDSS MOC 4 colors. They indicated that the D-type asteroids are evenly distributed in the main-belt, but those are not seen in the outer belt with the inclinations greater than 20 ◦. On the other hand, DeMeo & Carry (2013) and DeMeo & Carry (2014) found evidence for the D-type asteroids in the inner- and mid-belts. Our result is consistent with the results of DeMeo & Carry (2013) and DeMeo & Carry (2014). Highly-Inclined Asteroids 11

Table 3 Fractions of the asteroids in the SMASSII catalog (Bus & Binzel 2002b) Inclination Type 2.1

However, these results are not consistent with the influx of primitive material from Nice model like migration. For example, Levison et al. (2009) investigated orbital migration of trans-Neptunian objects. They focused on bodieswith the size largerthan 40 km and conclude that a significant fraction of objects in the main-belt are captured primordial trans-Neptunian objects. They also find that the D-type and P- type material do not come closer than 2.6 AU. This result of the numerical simulation is not consistent with the result of the observation in this work. Walsh et al. (2011) proposed a dynamical model of the early , so-called a ”grand tack model”. In this model, Jupiter first migrated inward by gas drag of the protoplanetary disk. When Jupiter reached at ∼ 1.5 AU from the Sun, Saturn grew to 60 M⊕, then migrated inward. At the same time, Jupiter tacked and migrated outward. The moving Jupiter initially scattered most of the planetesimals in the main-belt, but then repopulates the main-belt, where inner-belt asteroids originate between 1 and 3 AU and outer-belt asteroids between and beyond the giant planets. This distribution is consistent with the two separate populations of the asteroids, if the planetesimals from the inner disk are considered to be the S-type and those from the outer regions the C-type. The model indicates that both types of the asteroids share similar distributions of eccentricity and inclination; most of the outer disk objects on planet-crossing orbits have high eccentricity, while many of the objects from between the giant planets were scattered earlier and damped to lower-eccentricity planet-crossing orbits. We revealed the D-type asteroids in the inner main-belt but with high relative velocity. Such a population is not predicted by Walsh et al. (2011). Ida & Makino (1993) indicated that the planetesimals were distributed in a V-shape with the apex at Jupiter in this diagram, if they were formed near to Jupiter and were subsequently scattered. For D- type asteroids with a semi-major axis smaller than 5 AU, those asteroids with a smaller semi-major axis tend to have a large (e2 + i2)1/2 value. This distribution of D-type asteroids might trace the left-side of the V-shaped structure. Further identification of D-type asteroids based on spectroscopic observations is required to confirm the gravitational perturbation of Jupiter on planetesimals.

5 CONCLUSIONS

We obtained low-resolution optical spectra of 51 asteroids. Most of these were main-belt asteroids with a high orbital inclination. We assigned spectral types to 38 asteroids. Eight asteroids were classified as D-type. We confirmed the existence of the inner main-belt D-type asteroids. We also revealed that the inner main-belt D-type asteroids have higher relative velocity.

1. For the asteroids with a semi-major axis of between 2.1 AU and 3.3 AU and with a high orbital inclination, the fraction of D-type asteroids was higher than that of the asteroids with the same range of semi-major axis and with a low orbital inclination. 2. The fractions of C- and S-type asteroids are comparable between those asteroids with a semi-major axis of between 2.1 AU and 2.5 AU and a high orbital inclination and asteroids with a low orbital inclination. 3. An abundant population of D-type main-belt asteroids with a high orbital inclination indicates that a fraction of the high orbital inclination asteroids were formed near Jupiter, and then migrated inward obtaining a highly-inclined orbit. 12 A. Iwai and Y. Itoh

Fig. 2 Distribution of asteroids. The vertical axis represents relative velocity of the asteroids. The filled squares indicate D-type asteroids, and the dots indicate asteroids other than D-type. Data were compiled from Bus & Binzel (2002b), Lazzaro et al. (2004),and this work. D-type asteroids in the inner main-belt region do not have small relative velocity.

Acknowledgements We thank the members of staff and operators at the UH 2.2 m telescope and the IGO 2 m telescope. This research is partially supported by ”the Japan-India Cooperative Science Program” carried out by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) and the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India.

References

Adachi, I., Hayashi, C., Nakazawa, K., 1976, PThPh, 56, 1756 Ahn, C. P., et al., 2012, ApJS, 203, 21 Bus, S. J., Binzel, R. P., 2002a, Icarus, 158, 106 Highly-Inclined Asteroids 13

Bus, S. J., Binzel, R. P., 2002b, Icarus, 158, 146 Carvano, J. M., et al., 2010, A&A, 510, 43 DeMeo, F. E., Carry, B., 2013, Icarus, 226, 723 DeMeo, F. E., Carry, B., 2014, Nature, 505, 629 Fitzsimmons, A., et al., 1994, A&A, 282, 634 Gomes, R., et al., 2005, Nature, 435, 466 Ida, S., Makino, J., 1993, Icarus, 106, 210 Ivezic, Z., et al., 2001, AJ, 122, 2749 Lazzaro, D., et al., 2004, Icarus, 172, 179 Levison, H. F., et al., 2009, Nature, 460, 364 Lykawka, P. S., Mukai, T., 2008, AJ, 135, 1161 Nagasawa, M., Tanaka, H., Ida, S., 2000, AJ, 119, 1480 Terai, T., Itoh, Y., 2011, PASJ, 63, 335 Terai, T., Takahashi, J., Itoh, Y., 2013, AJ, 146, 111 Walsh, K. J. et al., 2011, Nature, 475, 206