Exploring Jogja Geoheritage: the Lifetime of an Ancient Volcanic Arc in Java

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Exploring Jogja Geoheritage: the Lifetime of an Ancient Volcanic Arc in Java EXPLORING JOGJA GEOHERITAGE: THE LIFETIME OF AN ANCIENT VOLCANIC ARC IN JAVA C. Prasetyadi Geology Department – UPN “Veteran” Yogyakarta ([email protected]) Abstract In addition to their art and cultural heritages, Jogja and surrounding areas have also an important and interesting geoheritage. In areas not far from Jogja, within radius around 40 km and only one day visiting, there are characteristic and important rock exposures that can be reached easily because their locations are nearby the asphalted roads. These exposures are very special due to geological informations they contain. The informations include a whole story of the lifetime of an ancient volcanic arc of Java known as the Oligo-Miocene Arc or called the Old Andesite Formation (AOF), “the backbone of Java Island”, which forms the southern part of Java Island. The story is a polyhistory consisting of periods with different geological events. These events consist of pre-OAF, syn-OAF and post-OAF. The pre-OAF period is a non-volcanic period as shown by the outcrops of Pre-Tertiary basement and Paleogene carbonate and silisiclastic rocks in Bayat areas. The syn-OAF period comprises three phases, namely early phase (or monogenetic volcanism, indicated by the pillow lava of Berbah Village), constructing phase (or polygenetic volcanism, marked by the sequence of volcanic breccia and aglomerate of Nglanggran Formation), and destructing phase (or explosive volcanism, as evidenced by thick layer of volcanic ash of the Semilir Formation). The post-OAF period is indicated by the widespread exposures of Miocene-Pliocene carbonate rock which is well-known as the reefal limestone of Wonosari Platform to the south of Jogja. This paper is aimed to introduce some easily reachable outcrops along with the route or traverse where we can explore them in order to find out the whole geological history of Java as the main volcanic arc in western Indonesia region. There is no other route or traverse of this kind in Java so it is appropriate enough to considered it as Jogja geoheritage. 1. INTRODUCTION Java island is one of the largest volcanic island, beside Sumatera Island, in western Indonesia region. As the main island with its highly dense population, Java island has a high potential of geological hazard due to the presence of active volcanoes and high seismic activity. The years of 2006 and 2010 are years that have been noted and memorized by most people of Jogja and surrounding areas as years of disaster because of the occurrences of Jogja earthquake and Merapi eruption. Both geological hazard events are traumatic for most people, especially for ordinary people. Facing and coping all the consequences of the disasters, most people were shocked and unprepared mentally. This is due to the lack of basic knowledge and awareness that they live in a region with highly geological hazard prone. Therefore in the future it is urgent to disseminate among ordinary people the informations associated with geological hazard and, more basic and important, informations about how the Java island they occupy are formed. To achieve this purpose, namely to inform and help ordinary people in Java to get the very basic knowledge of the geological evolution of their island, we need to find a simple way or method. Just by exploring the areas surrounding Jogja (Figure-1) we have found the method, and we called it as “introduction to Jogja geoheritage” and described as follows: In areas surrounding Jogja, such as Berbah, Candi Ijo Prambanan, Bayat and neigboring areas, we can find field evidences in the form of rock exposures that contain informations on geological history back to a hundred million years ago. The geological informations contained by the series of outcrop construct a complete history of the lifetime of Java as the main volcanic island arc in western Indonesia. The informations include the lifetime of an ancient volcanic arc of Java known as the Oligo-Miocene Arc or called the Old Andesite Formation (AOF), “the backbone of Java Island”, which forms the southern part of Java Island (Figure-2). The story is a polyhistory that consists of periods with different geological events. These events consist of pre-OAF, syn-OAF and post-OAF. The pre-OAF period is a non-volcanic period as shown by the outcrops of Pre-Tertiary basement and Paleogene carbonate and silisiclastic rocks. The syn-OAF period comprises three phases, namely early phase (or monogenetic volcanism), constructing phase (or polygenetic volcanism), and destructing phase (or explosive volcanism). The post-OAF period is indicated by the widespread exposures of Miocene-Pliocene carbonate rock which is well-known as the reefal limestone of Wonosari Platform to the south of Jogja. This paper is aimed to introduce some easily accessible outcrops along with the route or traverse where we can explore them in order to find out the whole geological history of Java as the main volcanic arc in western Indonesia region. There is no other route or traverse of this kind in Java therefore it is appropriate enough to considered it as Jogja geoheritage. With the dissemination and socialization of this geoheritage through some ways and method, espcially through a one-day fieldtrip, it is hope that more people in Jogja, and generally in Java, will improve their knowledge and awareness to the fact that Java island is a highly geohazard prone region. 2. BRIEF GEOLOGICAL HISTORY OF JAVA The following is a brief geological history of the eastern part of Java since Late Cretaceous to Miocene summarized from Prasetyadi (2007) (Figure-3): Late Cretaceous – Paleocene (Figure-3 A) The occurrence of Cretaceous Luk-Ulo Melange Complex in Karangsambung area, north of Kebumen, Central Java indicate that during Late Cretaceous the area was part of subduction zone of Indo- Australian Plate northwestward beneath the Sundaland continental plate. This subduction zone extends to the west to Ciletuh area in West Java and to the NE to Meratus Mountain area in the SE tip of Kalimantan. In Late Cretaceous in its movement to the west East Java microcontinent collided with the subduction zone of Karangsambung-Meratus resulted in subduction termination and forming the suture zone of Meratus Mountain. Middle Eocene (Figure-3 B) During 54 to 45 million years ago plate interactions in Indian Ocean region were marked by a significant decrease of northward movement of India Continent. This sudden drop of India movement to the north resulted in the slow down of convergent rate of Indo-Australian plate and causing an extension phase to take place in eastern region of Indian Ocean. This extension regime was a period of massive basin formations in some areas such as Karangsambung, Nanggulan, and Bayat in Central Java, and in East Java. In Nanggulan and Bayat areas the sediments were deposited ini a shallow marine environment and interpreted to be located in the eastern shelf area of East Java microcontinent and adjacent to the west with deep basin of Karangsambung. Most of Eocene rocks in Java is free from volcanic material. Late Eocene – Early Oligocene (Figure-3 C) Most of upper Eocene sediments have an unconformable contacts with the younger Oligocene rock units above it. The unconformity was probably associated with a deformation that took place at that time. The deformation was also related with the northward movement of Australia continent. The increasing movement of Australia continent caused a higher rate of convergence of Indo-Australian Plate in Java trench and pushing East Java microcontinent to the northwest. This microcontinent convergence resulted in the deformation of Paleogen formations ini Karangsambung, Nanggulan, and Bayat. Oligocene – Miocene (Figure-3 D) The increase of movement rate of Australia continent northward might continue until Middle Oligocene time. This event triggered a volcanic activity associated with the emerging of volcanic zone in the southern part of Java known as the Old Andesite Formation (OAF) and its area is called as the Southern Mountain zone. This volcanic activity did not reach regions to the north of Java where carbonate and silisiclastic sedimentation took place continuously in this area. When Australia continent was approaching the subduction zone of Java-Banda in Late Miocene, there was a massive tectonic compression occurring in SE Asia region. This compression regime inversed most of older sediments. In southern Java because of the arrival of Australia continent in Banda Arc, the volcanic activity became inactive and the area underwent uplift. The uplift of the area was marked by the widespread sedimentation of reefal limestone in southern part of Java. The reefal complexes are well- known as Punung formation in East Java, and as Wonosari, Sentolo, and Kalipucang Formations in Central Java. The above geological history in general can be divided into periods as follows (Figure-4): 1. Period of modern volcano 2. Period of post-OAF (Period of inactive Oligo-Miocene Volcanic Arc) 3. Period of OAF (Period of active Oligo-Miocene Volcanic Arc) 4. Period of pre-OAF (Period of non-volcanic arc) 5. Period of Pre-Tertiary Geology or Initial formation of Java Island (Period of microcontinent amalgamation) 3. THE SITES OF JOGJA GEOHERITAGE EXPOSURES There are eigth sites or locations where the rock exposures can be observed very closely because their high accessibilities (Figure-5). This series of outcrop contain complete informations concerning the geological polyhistory of Java. Site 1. Pillow Lava – Berbah Village (Figure-5 A) Based on stratigraphic correlation, the age of Berbah pillow lava is about Oligosen (approximately 30 Million years ago). Its age and basaltic composition indicate that this pillow lava was a product of monogenetic volcanism, an initial stage of volcanism in a volcanic arc. In the next stage this monogenetic volcanism will develop into a polygenetic volcanism forming strato volcanoes in which their composition turn into andesitic.
Recommended publications
  • The Future of North American Geoparks
    The Future of North American Geoparks Heidi Bailey and Wesley Hill Introduction Geoparks have proven to be highly successful in other parts of the world, particu- larly in Europe and China. The greatest strength of the geopark initiative is the attention it brings to earth heritage resources and the resulting socioeconomic development that occurs in rural areas. The future of the North American geoparks has yet to be decided. Because the geopark idea differs from other park concepts in North America, land managers and the pub- lic will likely have many questions about the program. This article addresses some of these questions and is intended to help further the discussion about the future of North American geoparks. What would be the structure of a North American geopark? A geopark is a destination identity similar in concept to a national heritage area. Geoparks are defined by the underlying geology of the landscape and transcend the boundaries of parks and other protected areas. A geopark operates as a partnership of people and land managers working to promote earth heritage through education and sustainable tourism. A North American geopark will not be a new category of protected area. The land remains entirely in the hands of local people and existing land management systems. Local, state, or national governments retain control of the public lands within a geopark. Private land remains in the hands of private owners. When an area is designated a geopark, it is man- aged through a bottom-up partnership approach. Does a geopark only focus on geology? A geopark is not just another geology park.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoconservation in Protected Areas Principal Authors: CONTENTS Roger Crofts and John E
    Chapter 18 GeoconserVation in Protected Areas Principal authors: CONTENTS Roger Crofts and John E. Gordon • Introduction • The need for geoconservation in protected areas Supporting author: Vincent L. Santucci • Managing geoconservation in protected areas • Conclusion • References Principal AUTHORS ROGER CROFTS is an International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) Emeritus, was Founding CEO of Scottish Natural Heritage (1992– 2002), WCPA Regional Vice-chair for Europe (2000–08), and is Chair of the Royal Scottish Geographical Society. JOHN E. GORDON is a Deputy Chair of the WCPA Geoheritage Specialist Group, and an honorary professor in the School of Geography & Geosciences, University of St. Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom. Supporting AUTHOR VINCENT SANTUCCI is Senior Geologist and Palaeontologist with the US National Park Service, USA. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are grateful for helpful comments on the draft text from: Jay Anderson, Australia; Tim Badman, IUCN, Switzerland; José Brilha, University of Minho, Portugal; Margaret Brocx, Geological Society of Australia, Australia; Enrique Díaz-Martínez, Patrimonio Geológico y Minero (IGME), Spain; Neil Ellis, Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC), United Kingdom; Lars Erikstad, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Norway; Murray Gray, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom; Bernie Joyce, University of Melbourne, Australia; Ashish Kothari, Kalpavriksh, India; Jonathan Larwood, Natural England, United Kingdom; Estelle Levin, Estelle Levin Limited, United Kingdom; Sven Lundqvist, Geological Survey of Sweden, Sweden; Colin MacFadyen, Scottish Natural Heritage, United Kingdom; Colin Prosser, Natural England, United Kingdom; Chris Sharples, University of Tasmania, Australia; Kyung Sik Woo, Kangwon National University, Korea and, Graeme Worboys, The Australian National University, Australia. Citation Crofts, R.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genealogy of UNESCO Global Geopark: Emergence and Evolution Yi Du, Yves Girault
    A Genealogy of UNESCO Global Geopark: Emergence and Evolution Yi Du, Yves Girault To cite this version: Yi Du, Yves Girault. A Genealogy of UNESCO Global Geopark: Emergence and Evolution. In- ternational Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, Darswin Publishing House, 2018, 6 (2), pp.1-17. 10.17149/ijgp.j.issn.2577.4441.2018.02.001. hal-01974364 HAL Id: hal-01974364 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01974364 Submitted on 5 Feb 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks. 2018, 6(2): 1-17 DOI: 10.17149/ijgp.j.issn.2577.4441.2018.02.001 © 2018 Darswin Publishing House A Genealogy of UNESCO Global Geopark: Emergence and Evolution Yi Du, Yves Girault National Museum of Natural History, Paris, France The creation, in late 2015, of the UNESCO Global Geopark (UGG) label, as part of UNESCO’s patrimonialization system, was the outcome of a long process of negotia- tion between the United Nations Education Science and Culture Organization (UNESCO), an epistemic community (the International Union of Geological Sciences, IUGS) and the NGO Global Geopark Network (GGN). Today UNESCO Global Geo- parks are defined as “single, unified geographical areas where sites and landscapes of international geological significance are managed with a holistic concept of protection, education and sustainable development”.
    [Show full text]
  • IUGS Geoheritage Task Group
    IUGS GeoHeritage Task Group Annual Report 2011 Plan of action for 2012 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES (IUGS) 1. TITLE OF CONSTITUENT BODY IUGS Geoheritage task group 2. OVERALL OBJECTIVES Through the leadership of individuals and organizations with background in this particular issue, the IUGS Task Group on GeoHeritage works to facilitate the development of national and international awareness and understanding of the underlying concepts. The Task Group also helps to understand and recognize the various types of geosites (educative, recreative, protective …) around the world and to promote in developing countries the will to develop their own geoheritage. The Task Group works mainly through modern means of communication including discussions, meetings and information exchange via email and teleconferences, although some meetings may be required from time to time to anchor some decisions. As a consequence this group will function at little cost to IUGS and member organizations. Three main objectives addresses: 1- To develop an inventory of geoheritage sites. The large majority of these sites are isolated (a quarry, a single outcrop) and probably will never belong to any kind of geopark but they are valuable for education and for testimony of the history of the earth. Several organizations (national, disciplinary i.e. palaeontologists) are working or have the will to work on them. Their list and content should be available from any computer. 2- To compile the regulations on trade of ex-situ objects (fossils, mineral, meteorites) existing in different countries, which are usually difficult to obtain. The availability of this information on a website would be of a great help to geologist and other kind of people who have to deal with that matter (customs, …).
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions About UNESCO Global Geoparks – General Information, Definitions, Governance and Framing Issues
    FAQs general public Frequently asked questions about UNESCO Global Geoparks – General information, definitions, governance and framing issues What is a UNESCO Global Geopark? • Definition • What are the aims of a UNESCO Global Geopark? • What are the essential factors to be considered before creating a UNESCO Global Geopark? • How are UNESCO Global Geoparks established and managed? • Has a UNESCO Global Geopark a required minimum or a maximum size? • Is a UNESCO Global Geopark a new category of protected area? • Is there a limited number of UNESCO Global Geoparks within any one country? • What are typical activities within a UNESCO Global Geopark? • Do UNESCO Global Geoparks do scientific research? • What does community involvement and empowerment entail in a UNESCO Global Geopark? • How does a YNESCO Global Geopark deal with natural resources? • Can industrial activities and construction projects take place in a UNESCO Global Geopark? • Is the selling of any original geological material (e.g. rocks, minerals, and fossils) permitted within a UNESCO Global Geopark? • What to do if a National Geoparks Network exists in a country? • What is the Global Geoparks Network? UNESCO Global Geoparks among UNESCO designations and the role of UNESCO • What is the difference between UNESCO Global Geoparks, Biosphere Reserves and World Heritage Sites? • What is the role of UNESCO? • Does UNESCO provide training courses? What is a UNESCO Global Geopark? • Definition UNESCO Global Geoparks are single, unified geographical areas where sites and landscapes of international geological significance are managed with a holistic concept of protection, education and sustainable development. A UNESCO Global Geopark comprises a number of geological heritage sites of special scientific importance, rarity or beauty.
    [Show full text]
  • Informed Geoheritage Conservation: Determinant Analysis Based on Bibliometric and Sustainability Indicators Using Ordination Techniques
    land Article Informed Geoheritage Conservation: Determinant Analysis Based on Bibliometric and Sustainability Indicators Using Ordination Techniques Boglárka Németh, Károly Németh * and Jon N. Procter School of Agriculture and Environment, Volcanic Risk Solutions, Turitea Campus, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand; [email protected] (B.N.); [email protected] (J.N.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +64-27-479-1484 Abstract: Ordination methods are used in ecological multivariate statistics in order to reduce the number of dimensions and arrange individual variables along environmental variables. Geoheritage designation is a new challenge for conservation planning. Quantification of geoheritage to date is used explicitly for site selection, however, it also carries significant potential to be one of the indicators of sustainable development that is delivered through geosystem services. In order to achieve such a dominant position, geoheritage needs to be included in the business as usual model of conservation planning. Questions about the quantification process that have typically been addressed in geoheritage studies can be answered more directly by their relationships to world development indicators. We aim to relate the major informative geoheritage practices to underlying trends of successful geoheritage implementation through statistical analysis of countries with the highest trackable geoheritage interest. Correspondence analysis (CA) was used to obtain information on how certain indicators bundle together. Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was used Citation: Németh, B.; Németh, K.; to detect sets of factors to determine positive geoheritage conservation outcomes. The analysis Procter, J.N. Informed Geoheritage Conservation: Determinant Analysis resulted in ordination diagrams that visualize correlations among determinant variables translated Based on Bibliometric and to links between socio-economic background and geoheritage conservation outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoheritage and Resilience of Dallol and the Northern Danakil Depression in Ethiopia
    Geoheritage (2020) 12: 82 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00499-8 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Geoheritage and Resilience of Dallol and the Northern Danakil Depression in Ethiopia Viktor Vereb1,2 & Benjamin van Wyk de Vries2 & Miruts Hagos3 & Dávid Karátson1 Received: 22 November 2019 /Accepted: 29 July 2020 /Published online: 26 September 2020 # The Author(s) 2020 Abstract The Danakil Depression, located in the northern segment of the Afar rift, is a world-class example of active rifting and the birth of a new ocean. The unique, yet only partially interpreted geothermal system of Dallol in northern Danakil is currently receiving renewed attention by researchers and visitors despite its extreme climate since the recent improvements of infrastructure and the stabilisation of Ethio-Eritrean political relations. Previous studies focused on the general geological description, the economic exploitation of potash reserves and interpretation of the complex hydrothermal processes. Continuing monitoring of geothermal activity has not yet been carried out, and the valorisation of local geoheritage has not accompanied the increased interest of tourists. Here, we present a three-step study in order to demonstrate the unique geological environment and international geoheritage significance of Dallol and Danakil. A three-year-long remote sensing campaign has been done to provide informa- tion on improving the resilience of visitors through interpreted, monthly hazard maps, and on following up the changes of geothermal activity. Over the same time, the first geoheritage assessment of the region for 13 geosites was carried out along with a comparative analysis of three quantitative methods (to evaluate the scientific importance and the geotouristic development potential of the area).
    [Show full text]
  • This Issue of the Newsletter of the IUCN-WCPA Geoheritage Specialist Group (GSG) Reports on Activities During 2015 and 2016 and Looks Forward to Future Developments
    Huanjiang Karst, Guangxi Province, China. The geodiversity of the fengcong (cone) karst supports a pristine, subtropical, humid-climate, mixed-forest ecosystem with vertical differentiation of forest types between the depressions and valleys and the tops of the hills. Numerous endemic plant and animal species are present. The karst landscape also has high cultural values. The 1st International Conference on Geoheritage, held in the city of Huanjiang in June 2015, celebrated the inscription of Huanjiang Karst as part of the South China Karst World Heritage Site in 2014 (Photo: John Gordon). This issue of the Newsletter of the IUCN-WCPA Geoheritage Specialist Group (GSG) reports on activities during 2015 and 2016 and looks forward to future developments. Among the highlights, the GSG helped to organize the 1st International Conference on Geoheritage held in Huanjiang County, Guangxi Province, China, in June 2015, while in September 2016, various Steering Committee members represented the GSG at the IUCN World Conservation Congress (WCC) in Hawaiʻi (USA), the 35th IUGS International Geological Congress (IGC) in Cape Town (South Africa) and the 7th International Conference on UNESCO Global Geoparks in Torquay (UK). The final declaration from the WCC, the 'Hawaiʻi Commitments', recognises geodiversity and the value of nature as a whole, while the IUCN Programme 2017-2020 offers opportunities to link geodiversity to the wider nature conservation agenda. In addition, a resolution on moveable geological heritage was approved at the WCC. The Newsletter also reports on activities among partner organisations, including the Global Geoparks Network, and the establishment of a new IUGS Commission on Geoheritage. Following publication of a chapter on geoconservation in IUCN’s Protected Area Governance and Management book (2015), the GSG is now preparing an IUCN Best Practice Guideline on Geoheritage Conservation in Protected Areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 18. Geoheritage and Geoparks
    Provided for non-commercial research and educational use only. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use. This chapter was originally published in the book Geoheritage, published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author's benefit and for the benefit of the author's institution, for non-commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues who know you, and providing a copy to your institution's administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution's website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier's permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial From José Brilha, Geoheritage and Geoparks. In: Emmanuel Reynard and José Brilha, editors, Geoheritage. Chennai: Elsevier, 2018, pp. 323-336. ISBN: 978-0-12-809531-7 Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. Elsevier. Author’s personal copy CHAPTER GEOHERITAGE AND GEOPARKS 18 Jose´ Brilha University of Minho, Braga, Portugal 18.1 GEOPARKS: THE DAWN OF AN INNOVATIVE CONCEPT For all geoconservationists, the geopark is the striking concept that in less than 20 years has gained a worldwide recognition and has taken geoheritage outside the limited and small world of geoscientists. The original concept of geopark was developed in Europe in the late 1980s. It refers to a territory with a particular geological heritage and a sustainable territorial development strategy (EGN, 2000). In order to understand the context in which the geopark concept was developed, it is necessary to travel back to the early 1970s, when the world began to be concerned about the protection of natural and cultural assets.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOHERITAGE and GEODIVERSITY
    GEOHERITAGE and GEODIVERSITY Geoheritage is an important part of natural heritage which must be preserved for the benefit of future generations. Many geological elements are of special interest for science, education or tourism. These are the subjects of research in geoconservation, a discipline recently incorporated to the Earth sciences. This booklet attempts to be an easy reference document for those new to the field of geoconservation, as well as for those ready to delve deeper. It provi- des the basic concepts needed to understand the significance of geological heritage and geodiversity, as well as their assessment and proper management for sustainable use. PanAfGeo edition. May 2019 Authors: Luis Carcavilla, Enrique Díaz-Martínez, GEODIVERSITY AND GEOLOGICAL HERITAGE Ángel García-Cortés, Juana Vegas. Geodiversity and geoheritage are amongst the most As a collection of the most representative, unique Instituto Geológico y Minero de España (IGME) recent study areas incorporated into the Earth and interesting elements of the geological record, geoheritage is a legacy that we must pass on to Sciences. Their investigation was born out of a new future generations, and our duty in the name of way of understanding our relationship with the social and scientific progress. This booklet is for free distribution and may be reproduced only if proper reference to the original Earth. Over time, society has changed its is made: Carcavilla et.al. (2019). Geoheritage and geodiversity. Instituto Geológico y Minero de perception of nature. Nowadays, it is Geoheritage may also be an important España. 24 p. resource for the sustainable deve- considered a right, a necessity PanAfGeo edition.
    [Show full text]
  • International Commission on Geoheritage
    International Commission on Geoheritage SUMMARY REPORT 2017-2020 October 2020 INDEX 1. New structure and main goals of the International Commission on Geoheritage 2021 – 2024 2. Report of activities of the Sub-Commission on Sites and Collections. 2017 – 2020. 3. Report of activities of the Sub-commission on Heritage stones 2017 – 2020 Information compiled by: Dr. Asier HIlario. Chair, International Commission on Geoheritage. IUGS Dr. Juana Vegas, Secretary General, International Commission on Geoheritage. IUGS Prof. Benjamin Van Vyk de Vries, Chair. Subcommission on Sites and colections Prof. Gurmeet Kaur. Chair, Subcommission on Heritage Stones New IUGS Commission on Geoheritage IUGS Commision on Geoheritage was created in 2016 with two sub-commission: • Sub-Commission on Sites and Collections. • Sub-Commission on Heritage Stones The IUGS Executive Committee has recently dissolved the International Commission on Geoheritage, to create a more robust and workable structure. New commission structure Dr. Asier Hilario Orús, Scientific director of the Basque Coast UNESCO Global Geopark, has been appointed as Chair of the IUGS International Commission on Geoheritage. Joining Dr. Hilario on the executive of the new Commission are Dr. Juana Vegas, Secretary General, who leads the geoheritage program at the Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, Madrid; Dr. Angela Ehling, Vice Chair, who leads the geoheritage program in the Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe in Berlin; and Prof. Zhang Jianping of Beijing, Vice Chair, who leads the Geoheritage Reseach Center in China University of Geosciences. Prof. Ben Van Vyk de Vries from Clermont Auvergne University, will chair teh Sub-commsion on Sites and Collections and Prof. Kaur Gurmeet will chair the Sub-commision on Heritage Stones.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article (PDF)
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 231 5th International Conference on Community Development (AMCA 2018) Coastal Tourism Management to Support Economic Community Development in Bantul Regency, Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Problems and Solutions Istiana Rahatmawati Sri Muryantini University of Pembanganan Nasional “Veteran” University of Pembanganan Nasional “Veteran” Yogyakarta Yogyakarta [email protected]. [email protected] Abstract. Indonesia is the archipelago state. depth in amount of meters to thousands meter below Indonesia comprise more than 17 thousand (Banda trough). The physical characteristics are islands with beautiful panorama especially the various concerning with such as, ebb and flow, the magnificent of coastal tourist areas. Arief Yahya temperature, the stream, the diverse and seabed. The the minister of Tourism of Indonesia (2016) said beautiful scenery down the sea within the variety of Indonesia got 1 Million USD from coastal tourism sea habitants, flora and fauna, beautiful coasts, calm or one percent of total foreign exchange. It shows sea, or even big waves are big potency for marine that the government’s policy on coastal tourism and coastal tourism that can contribute national and its services sector are not yet fully income significantly. However, Mr. Arief Yahya the implemented. Bantul regency have 13 coastal minister of Tourism said (2016), coastal and marine tourist areas which are not well managed yet, and tourism contribute only 1 percent foreign exchange four of them are not handed yet by government. from Indonesia’s total foreign exchange [1]. The This research is conducted in the field of research President had declared strategic location Indonesia in and library research.
    [Show full text]