DOCSLIB.ORG

Darwin's Tea Party

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Darwin's Tea Party Darwin’s Tea Party Evolution, Genetics and Human Nature prepared for Humanities 345-101-MQ “Darwin’s Tea Party” Dawson College Fall 2019 by Gabriel Tordjman contents 1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 About Darwin’s “Dangerous Idea” .................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Overview of the book ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.3. What is Biological Knowledge?........................................................................................................ 6 1.4 Darwin’s Tea Party Website ............................................................................................................. 7 2. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY (2.5 mya-1859) ................................................................ 8 2.1. Prehistoric Biological Knowledge in the Paleolithic Era ............................................................... 8 2.1.1 Cultural Evolution and Human Uniqueness ............................................................................. 9 2.1.2 Physical Knowledge in the Paleolithic Era ............................................................................ 12 2.1.3 Biological Knowledge in the Paleolithic Era ......................................................................... 14 2.1.4 Hunter-gatherer Society ......................................................................................................... 17 2.1.5 Summary of Prehistoric Biological Knowledge in the Paleolithic era .................................. 19 2.1.6 Questions on Prehistoric Biological Knowledge in the Paleolithic era .................................. 20 2.2 Biological Knowledge in the Neolithic Era: The Agricultural (or Neolithic) Revolution .......... 21 2.2.1 What was the Agricultural Revolution? ................................................................................. 21 2.2.2. Consequences of the Agricultural Revolution on Human Society ........................................ 23 2.2.3. Consequences of Agricultural Revolution on the Environment ............................................ 25 2.2.4. The Birth of Civilization and the End of Prehistory .............................................................. 27 2.2.5 Biological and Cultural Evolution (again) ............................................................................. 28 2.2.5 Questions to Prehistoric Biological Knowledge in the Neolithic Era .................................... 29 2.2.6 Prehistoric Biological Knowledge Puzzle .............................................................................. 30 2.3. Biological Knowledge and Ancient Civilizations .......................................................................... 31 2.4 Ancient Greek Civilization .............................................................................................................. 34 2.4.1 Background: Geography and Culture ..................................................................................... 34 2.4.2. A New Chapter in the Development of Knowledge: The Invention of Philosophy .............. 34 2.4.3. Ancient Greek Physical Knowledge: The Atomic Theory .................................................... 36 2.4.4. The Philosophy of Materialism ............................................................................................. 36 2.4.5 Ancient Greek Biological Knowledge: Aristotle ................................................................... 37 2.4.6 Aristotle’s Critique of Materialism ....................................................................................... 37 2.4.7 Aristotle’s “Three Souls Concept” ......................................................................................... 38 2.4.8 Aristotle’s Classification of Life ............................................................................................ 39 2.4.9. Aristotle, Men, Women and Slaves ....................................................................................... 42 2.4.10 Philosophy: Accurate Explanation of Reality or Excuse for Social Inequality? .................. 43 2.4.11 The End of the Ancient Period ............................................................................................. 44 2.4.12 Ancient Biological Knowledge Puzzle................................................................................. 46 2.4.13 Questions to Ancient Biological Knowledge ....................................................................... 47 2.5 Religion, Science and Philosophy in The Middle Ages ................................................................. 48 2.5.1. Revealed Theology and Natural Theology ............................................................................ 48 2.5.2 Humanity’s Central Place in the Cosmos According to the Geocentric Theory .................... 49 2.5.3 The Great Chain of Being ...................................................................................................... 51 2.5.4 The Great Chain and Medieval Society ................................................................................. 53 2.5.5 Medieval Biological Knowledge Puzzle ................................................................................ 56 2.5.6 Study Questions to Medieval Biological Knowledge ............................................................ 57 2.6. The Modern Period and the Birth of Science (1450-1650) .......................................................... 58 2.6.1 Birth of the Modern Period (1450-1650) ............................................................................... 58 2.6.2. Francis Bacon and Induction ................................................................................................. 58 2.6.3 The Revival of Mechanism: The Universe as a Machine (1650-1850) .................................. 61 2.6.4. Triumph of the Heliocentric Theory and the Scientific Revolution ...................................... 62 2.6.5 The Philosophical Impact of the Scientific Revolution .......................................................... 64 2.6.6 The Birth of the Scientific Community .................................................................................. 65 2.6.7 What is Science? .................................................................................................................... 66 2.6.8 The Scientific Revolution Puzzle ........................................................................................... 68 2.6.9 Study Questions to the Modern Period and the Scientific Revolution ................................... 69 ii 3. DARWIN AND EVOLUTIONARY THEORY (1859-1885) ... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.1. Introduction ......................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.2. Natural Selection ................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.2.1 Geometrical Population increase. ........................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.2.2 Variation. ............................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.3 Deep Time. ............................................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.4. Some Common Problems in Understanding Evolution by Natural Selection.... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.5. Arguments for Evolution .................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.5.1. Deductive and Inductive Arguments for Evolution in Darwin’s Origin .... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.5.2. The Inductive Arguments for Evolution: Facts Supporting Premises of Natural Selection ........................................................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.5.3 Geological Evidence of Changes to the Earth ........................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.5.3 Fossil Evidence ...................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.5.4. Embryology ........................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.5.6 Homologous Parts .................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.5.7 Vestigial Parts ........................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.5.8. Geographical Distribution of Species ................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.5.9 Other Inductive Evidence for Evolution ................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.5.10 Critique of the Fossil Evidence for Evolution ...................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.5.11 Problems with the Inductive Evidence for Evolution ........... Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.6 Summary of Chapter 3 ........................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.7 Biological Evolution Puzzle ................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.8. Study and Discussion Questions to Chapter 3 .................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 4. EVOLUTION AND SOCIETY 1: EVOLUTION AND RELIGION (1859-1925) ...... Error! Bookmark not defined. 4.1 Introduction
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 607638.Pdf (8.865Mb)
    T.C. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ ANTROPOLOJİ BÖLÜMÜ ÇORAKYERLER HYENALARININ SİSTEMATİK PALEONTOLOJİ İLE İNCELENMESİ DOKTORA TEZİ ALPER YENER YAVUZ ANKARA – 2019 T.C. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ ANTROPOLOJİ BÖLÜMÜ ÇORAKYERLER HYENALARININ SİSTEMATİK PALEONTOLOJİ İLE İNCELENMESİ DOKTORA TEZİ ALPER YENER YAVUZ DANIŞMAN: PROF. DR. AYLA SEVİM EROL ANKARA – 2019 TEZ ONAY SAYF,ASI rünxiru crınıguniynri ANKARA üişivgnsiı:gşi sosyAı, giıirvrınn uxsrirüsü ANTRopoıo.ri ananiıiıt DALI pALBoANTRopoLOıi giıiu DALI ÇORAKYERLER HYğNAI"&RININ sİsrEMErİx rır,uoNroıoıİ İın iışcrr,gNMEsi DoKToRa rrzi Tez Danrşmanı ; Prcf. Dr. Ayla SEVLllr EROL Tez Jürisi [,ıyeleri Adı ve soyadı Prot, Dr. Ayla SEVIM EROL Prtıf. Dr. Timur CÜLTEKIN Prof, Dr. Tiiınel 'Ianju KAYA Doç. Dr. Yeşiın DOĞAN Dr. Ögıt, [I1,esi Serdar MAYDA Tez Sınavı T'arihi O.'3 i;|.Jo|*q rünriyB cuvrrruniynri ANKAna üNivrnsirpsi so syAL gilivlrnn nNsrirüsü ıvıüıünrüĞüNr Bu belge ile, bu tezdeki bütün bilgilerin akademik kurallara ve etik davranış ilkelerine uygun olarak toplanıp sunulduğunu beyan ederim. Bu kural ve ilkelerin gereği olarak, çalışmada bana ait olmayan tüm veri, düşünce ve sonuçları andığımı ve kaynağını gösterdiğimi ayrıca beyan ederim.(. .. ...l ......l20...) T ezi Hazırlayan Ö ğrencinin Adı ve Soyadı Alper Yener YAYUZ imzası {i"üı' ÖNSÖZ Çorakyerler fosil lokalitesi her geçen yıl giderek artan fosil sayısı ve yeni türlerle birlikte Dünya’da oldukça önemli bir omurgalı fosil lokalitesi konumuna gelmiştir. Çorakyerler lokalitesiyle tanıştığım 2003 yılından günümüze dek kazı sezonunun her sabahı yaşadığım heyecan ile arkama dönüp baktığımda koca bir 17 yıl geçmiş. Bu geçen sürede en büyük destekçim, yol göstericim olan ve hem akademik hem de özel hayatımda her daim yardımlarını sonuna kadar hissettiren çok değerli, kıymetli hocam Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Felis' Pamiri Ozansoy, 1959 (Carnivora, Felidae) from the Upper Miocene Of
    1 Re-appraisal of 'Felis' pamiri Ozansoy, 1959 (Carnivora, Felidae) from the upper Miocene of 2 Turkey: the earliest pantherin cat? 3 4 Denis GERAADS and Stéphane PEIGNE 5 Centre de Recherche sur la Paléobiodiversité et les Paléoenvironnements (UMR 7207), Sorbonne 6 Universités, MNHN, CNRS, UPMC, CP 38, 8 rue Buffon, 75231 PARIS Cedex 05, France 7 8 Running head: 'Felis' pamiri from Turkey 9 10 Abstract 11 Although the divergence of the Panthera clade from other Felidae might be as old as the 12 earliest middle Miocene, its fossil record before the Pliocene is virtually non-existent. Here we 13 reassess the affinities of a felid from the early upper Miocene of Turkey, known by well-preserved 14 associated upper and lower dentitions. We conclude that it belongs to the same genus 15 (Miopanthera Kretzoi, 1938) as the middle Miocene 'Styriofelis' lorteti (Gaillard, 1899), and that 16 this genus is close to, if not part of, the Panthera clade. 17 18 Keywords: Carnivora – Felidae – Pantherini – Phylogeny – Upper Miocene – Turkey 19 20 Introduction 21 The Felidae can be divided in two subfamilies (Johnson et al. 2006; Werdelin et al. 2010) 22 Felinae (= Pantherinae, or big cats, plus Felinae, or smaller cats, in e.g., Wilson and Mittermeier 23 2009) and Machairodontinae, although their monophyly is hard to demonstrate, the second one 24 being extinct. The Neogene fossil record of the Machairodontinae, or saber-toothed felids, is 25 satisfactory, but that of other members of the family, conveniently called conical-toothed felids 26 (although several of them have compressed, flattened canines) is much more patchy.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Late Miocene of Thermopigi (Serres, N.Greece), and the Relationships of the Genus Denis Geraads, Nikolaï Spassov, Evangelia Tsoukala
    A skull of Ancylotherium (Chalicotheriidae, Mammalia) from the Late Miocene of Thermopigi (Serres, N.Greece), and the relationships of the genus Denis Geraads, Nikolaï Spassov, Evangelia Tsoukala To cite this version: Denis Geraads, Nikolaï Spassov, Evangelia Tsoukala. A skull of Ancylotherium (Chalicotheriidae, Mammalia) from the Late Miocene of Thermopigi (Serres, N.Greece), and the relationships of the genus. Journal of Vertebrate Palaeontology, 2007, 27 (2), pp.461-466. halshs-00158253 HAL Id: halshs-00158253 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00158253 Submitted on 28 Jun 2007 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. A SKULL OF ANCYLOTHERIUM (CHALICOTHERIIDAE, MAMMALIA) FROM THE LATE MIOCENE OF THERMOPIGI (SERRES, N.GREECE), AND THE RELATIONSHIPS OF THE GENUS DENIS GERAADS 1, EVANGELIA TSOUKALA 2 and NIKOLAÏ SPASSOV 3 1 UPR 2147 CNRS, 44 rue de l'Amiral Mouchez, 75014 Paris, France, [email protected] (corresponding author) 2 School of Geology, Aristotle University, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece, [email protected] 3 National Museum of Natural History, Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd 1, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria, [email protected] RH: relationships of Ancylotherium 1 ABSTRACT The locality of Thermopigi in northern Greece has yielded a well- preserved skull of Ancylotherium pentelicum, among a rich collection of late Miocene mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Upper Messinian Assemblages of Fossil Vertebrate Remains of Verduno (NW Italy): Another Brick for a Latest Miocene Bridge Across the Mediterranean
    N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh. 272/3 (2014), 287–324 Article E Stuttgart, June 2014 The upper Messinian assemblages of fossil vertebrate remains of Verduno (NW Italy): Another brick for a latest Miocene bridge across the Mediterranean Simone Colombero, Chiara Angelone, Edmondo Bonelli, Giorgio Carnevale, Oreste Cavallo, Massimo Delfino, Piero Giuntelli, Paul Mazza, Giulio Pavia, Marco Pavia, and Giovanni Repetto With 12 figures and 3 tables Abstract: A considerable amount of vertebrate remains have been found in the upper Messinian Cassano Spinola Conglomerates Formation, which crops out along the Tanaro River near Verduno (Piedmont). The fossil-bearing deposits were deposited during the third stage of the Messinian Sa- linity Crisis (5.55-5.33 Ma) in connection with the ‘Lago-Mare’ event. Sedimentological evidence indicates that the deposition of this Formation originated in a variety of fresh- and brackish-water environments. This is the most diverse Late Miocene faunal community found in NW Italy up to now, and includes remains of fish (cyprinodontiforms and putative lophiiforms), amphibians (bufo- nids, ranids), reptiles (testudinids, geoemydids, lacertids, anguids, varanids, agamids, amphisbae- nians, scolecophidians, colubrids), birds (galliforms, accipitriforms and strigiforms) and mammals (proboscideans, perissodactyls, artiodactyls, carnivores, insectivores, rodents and lagomorphs). The tetrapod assemblages are consistent with the late Turolian age inferred based on sedimentological evidence and indicative of an open, semi-arid woodland savanna with at least modest, sparse fresh and brackish water bodies. The Verduno fossil assemblages share faunal similarities with coeval ones of southwest, central, and eastern Europe, as well as of peninsular Italy. Located at the crossroads between the two sides of the Mediterranean, northwestern Italy witnessed faunal exchanges between the different corners of the European continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Georgia and Western Azerbaijan, South Caucasus)
    Synopsis of the terrestrial vertebrate faunas from the Middle Kura Basin (Eastern Georgia and Western Azerbaijan, South Caucasus) MAIA BUKHSIANIDZE and KAKHABER KOIAVA Bukhsianidze, M. and Koiava, K. 2018. Synopsis of the terrestrial vertebrate faunas from the Middle Kura Basin (Eastern Georgia and Western Azerbaijan, South Caucasus). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 63 (3): 441–461. This paper summarizes knowledge on the Neogene–Quaternary terrestrial fossil record from the Middle Kura Basin accumulated over a century and aims to its integration into the current research. This fossil evidence is essential in understanding the evolution of the Eurasian biome, since this territory is located at the border of Eastern Mediterranean and Central Asian regions. The general biostratigraphic framework suggests existence of two major intervals of the terrestrial fossil record in the area, spanning ca. 10–7 Ma and ca. 3–1 Ma, and points to an important hiatus between the late Miocene and late Pliocene. General aspects of the paleogeographic history and fossil record suggest that the biogeographic role of the Middle Kura Basin has been changing over geological time from a refugium (Khersonian) to a full-fledged part of the Greco-Iranian province (Meotian–Pontian). The dynamic environmental changes during the Quaternary do not depict this territory as a refugium in its general sense. The greatest value of this fossil record is the potential to understand a detailed history of terrestrial life during demise of late Miocene Hominoidea in Eurasia and early Homo dispersal out of Africa. Late Miocene record of the Middle Kura Basin captures the latest stage of the Eastern Paratethys regression, and among other fossils counts the latest and the easternmost occurence of dryopithecine, Udabnopithecus garedziensis, while the almost uninterrupted fossil record of the late Pliocene–Early Pleistocene covers the time interval of the early human occupation of Caucasus and Eurasia.
    [Show full text]
  • (Middle–Late Miocene), West Zanjan, Northwestern Iran
    Foss. Rec., 24, 101–116, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/fr-24-101-2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Extensive vertebrate tracksite from the Upper Red Formation (middle–late Miocene), west Zanjan, northwestern Iran Nasrollah Abbassi1, Masoumeh Khoshyar1, Spencer G. Lucas2, and Farid Esmaeili3 1Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, 45371-38791, Iran 2New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, 1801 Mountain Road N.W., Albuquerque, NM 87104-1375, USA 3Department of Surveying Engineering, Faculty of Technology and Engineering, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, 45156-58145, Iran Correspondence: Nasrollah Abbassi ([email protected]) Received: 3 March 2021 – Revised: 17 March 2021 – Accepted: 18 March 2021 – Published: 23 April 2021 Abstract. An extensive vertebrate tracksite from the middle– by their lithostratigraphic position around the Qom Forma- late Miocene Upper Red Formation in western Zanjan tion (Rupelian to Tortonian), so the LRF is considered early Province, northwestern Iran, provides new records of pale- Oligocene in age, and the URF is assigned to the middle obiogeographical significance. These are records of common to late Miocene (Rahimzadeh, 1994; Gansser, 1955; Aghan- footprints of felids referred to as Felipeda lynxi Panin and abati, 2004). Continental facies of the URF are a good can- Avram, canids referred to as Canipeda longigriffa Panin and didate for vertebrate tracksite studies (Amini, 2001; Rafiei et Avram and less common bird footprints referred to as Ira- al., 2011; Amini, 1997), and numerous vertebrate footprints nipeda abeli Lambrecht. The Canipeda record establishes have been reported from this formation (Abbassi, 2010; Ab- the late Miocene presence of canids on the Iranian Plateau as bassi and Amini, 2008; Abbassi and Shakeri, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • 01-Mcdonal FM 1..6
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266755142 Phylogeny and evolution of cats (Felidae) Chapter · January 2010 CITATIONS READS 52 35,030 4 authors, including: Lars Werdelin Nobuyuki Yamaguchi Swedish Museum of Natural History Universiti Malaysia Terengganu 168 PUBLICATIONS 4,315 CITATIONS 106 PUBLICATIONS 2,208 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Sytematics and evolution of Erinaceidae View project Wildlife diseases View project All content following this page was uploaded by Nobuyuki Yamaguchi on 13 October 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 1/5/2010, SPi CHAPTER 2 Phylogeny and evolution of cats (Felidae) Lars Werdelin, Nobuyuki Yamaguchi, Warren E. Johnson, and Stephen J. O’Brien Artist’s reconstruction of the sabre-toothed cat Megantereon cultridens stalking its prey. (Illustration courtesy of Mauricio Anto´n.) Introduction felid evolution, especially that of the living felids and their ecological and functional relationship to the Cats, wild as well as domestic, fossil as well as living, extinct sabre-toothed felids. are familiar to people around the world. The family In this discussion, we will synthesize the available Felidae has a worldwide distribution and has been data, distinguishing as far as possible monophyletic associated with humans in various ways throughout groups of taxa, suggesting the most likely interrela- history (Quammen 2004). Their functional mor- tionships of the fossil lineages, but also pointing out phology, ecology, and behaviour have been the sub- that there are many problem areas that need to be ject of intense scrutiny by scientists for over 200 resolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Miocene Carnivorans from the Vallès-Penedès Basin (NE Iberian Peninsula)
    Departament de Biologia Animal, de Biologia Vegetal i d’Ecologia Unitat d’Antropologia Biològica Miocene carnivorans from the Vallès-Penedès Basin (NE Iberian Peninsula) Josep Maria Robles Giménez Tesi Doctoral 2014 A mi padre y familia. INDEX Index .......................................................................................................................... 7 Preface and Acknowledgments [in Spanish] ....................................................... 13 I.–Introduction and Methodology ........................................................................ 19 Chapter 1. General introduction and aims of this dissertation .......................... 21 1.1. Aims and structure of this work .............................................................. 21 Motivation of this dissertation ................................................................ 21 Type of dissertation and general overview ............................................. 22 1.2. An introduction to the Carnivora ............................................................ 24 What is a carnivoran? ............................................................................. 24 Biology .................................................................................................... 25 Systematics and phylogeny ...................................................................... 28 Evolutionary history ................................................................................ 42 1.3. Carnivoran anatomy ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Musee Cantonal De Geologie Lausanne
    MUSEE CANTONAL DE GEOLOGIE LAUSANNE BULLETIN D’ACTIVITES 2006 MUSEE CANTONAL DE GEOLOGIE Quartier UNIL - Dorigny Bâtiment Anthropole 1015 LAUSANNE Téléphone : 021 692 44 70 Télécopie : 021 692 44 75 [email protected] www.unil.ch/mcg Expositions permanentes : Palais de Rumine Place de la Riponne 6 1005 Lausanne Ma - Je : 11h00 - 18h00 Ve - Di : 11h00 - 17h00 Lu : fermé Couverture : Plateosaurus engelhardti Photo : Stefan Ansermet EDITORIAL Une année remarquable : meilleure permanentes et offre quatre dépliants fréquentation des salles de l’ère thématiques facilitant la visite. Pas payante avec 28’165 visiteurs, les moins de 31’000 exemplaires des trois dinosaures ont débarqués à Rumine, premiers dépliants ont été écoulés Felis attica s’est remis à ronronner, au cours de cette année 2006. And les priapolites se sont dévoilées et last but not least, j’aimerais relever enfin les célébrations du centenaire de le remarquable travail dans le cadre nos murs ont ponctué l’année 2006, d’Ecole-Musées qui a été fourni par sans oublier une thèse de doctorat, la rédactrice et les conservateurs pour de nouveaux minéraux découverts et produire un dossier pédagogique sur le nommés par le Musée, des visites de Musée. Ce dossier comble une lacune chercheurs d’Australie, d’Argentine dans l’enseignement des Sciences et de France et un « International de la Terre et sa mise en circulation Award » pour les affiches de nos prévue pour février 2007 devrait expositions permanentes. encore favoriser la visite de nos salles par les écoles. Et les expositions temporaires ? Il est toujours agréable pour un Souvenons-nous que si les finan- directeur et son équipe de voir que les ces cantonales se portent bien options prises sont reconnues et bien aujourd’hui, leur redressement n’a accueillies par le public et les écoles.
    [Show full text]
  • Verstka Upo 11 Tezis.Qxp
    НАЦІОНАЛЬНА АКАДЕМІЯ НАУК УКРАЇНИ ІНСТИТУТ ГЕОЛОГІЧНИХ НАУК ПАЛЕОНТОЛОГІЧНЕ ТОВАРИСТВО ПРОБЛЕМИ СТРАТИГРАФІЇ І КОРЕЛЯЦІЇ ФАНЕРОЗОЙСЬКИХ ВІДКЛАДІВ УКРАЇНИ Матеріали XXXIII сесії Палеонтологічного товариства НАН України КИЇВ – 2011 УДК 56:551.73/.78.02(477) Проблеми стратиграфії і кореляції фанерозойських відкладів України: Матеріали XXXIII сесії Палеонтологічного товариства НАН України (Київ, 6>8 черв. 2011 р.). – К., 2011. – 124 c. ISBN 978>966>02>6021>4 Тема XXXIII сесії Палеонтологічного товариства НАН України пов’язана з необхідністю отримати надійне палеонтологічне підґрунтя для створення модернізованих стратигра> фічних схем фанерозойських відкладів України. Представлені у збірнику матеріали присвячені розгляду дискусійних питань біостратиграфії фанерозойських відкладів України. За виділеними біозональними підрозділами оцінений ступінь роздільної здат> ності стратиграфічних схем, обґрунтована кореляція віддалених одновікових розрізів. Порушені філогенетичні, номенклатурні та методичні питання. Описані знахідки нових викопних організмів (морські ссавці, рептилії), які доповнюють палеонтологічну базу даних України. Для палеонтологів, геологів, біологів, студентів. Редакційна колегія Редакційна колегія ІГН НАН України: Палеонтологічного товариства П.Ф. Гожик (голов. ред.) НАН України: О.Ю. Митропольський (заст. голов. ред.) П.Ф. Гожик (голов. ред.) Н.В. Маслун (відп. секретар) В.Ю. Зосимович (заст. голов. ред.) В.Х. Геворк’ян О.А. Сіренко (секретар) М.Г. Демчишин М.М. Іванік К.І. Деревська О.П. Ольштинська В.Ю. Зосимович В.І. Полєтаєв
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article in PDF Format
    Carnivora (Mammalia) from the late Miocene of Akkas ¸ dag ˘ ı, Turkey Louis de BONIS Laboratoire de Géobiologie, Biochronologie et Paléontologie humaine, UMR 6046 du CNRS, Faculté des Sciences, Université de Poitiers, 40 avenue du recteur Pineau, F-86022 Poitiers (France) [email protected] Bonis L. de 2005. — Carnivora (Mammalia) from the late Miocene of Akkas ¸ dag ˘ ı, Turkey, in Sen S. (ed.), Geology, mammals and environments at Akkas ¸ dag ˘ ı, late Miocene of Central Anatolia. Geodiversitas 27 (4) : 567-589. ABSTRACT Volcanic ashes in Akkas¸ dag˘ ı (Turkey) have yielded well preserved remains of late Miocene Carnivora belonging to three families. The Hyaenidae are the most abundant. Adcrocuta eximia , a very common large animal, and Ictitherium viverrinum were first described from the Greek locality Pikermi. The type specimen of Hyaenictitherium wongii has been found in China but KEY WORDS the species is also present in European or Western Eurasian localities. Mammalia, Carnivora, Thalassictis spelaea and cf. Thalassictis sp. are less common but they were Hyaenidae, recovered from several European localities. The felid Felis cf. attica is a cat Felidae, Mustelidae, which is similar in size to Leptailurus serval ; its type locality is Pikermi but it late Miocene, has also been found at some other sites in Europe and Asia. Another, larger Turolian, felid is known from some limb bones. Skunks are not very common in Asian Akkas¸ dag˘ ı, Central Anatolia, or European fossil localities. Nevertheless several species have been described. Turkey. The Akkas¸ dag˘ ı skunk belongs to Promephitis hootoni. RÉSUMÉ Carnivora (Mammalia) du Miocène supérieur d’Akkas¸ dag˘ ı, Turquie.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 January 2006 | $10 NUCLEICACID PROTEIN FUNCTION QUANTITATIVE SOFTWARE AMPLIFICATION CELL BIOLOGY CLONING MICROARRAYS ANALYSIS & ANALYSIS PCR SOLUTIONS
    6 January 2006 | $10 NUCLEICACID PROTEIN FUNCTION QUANTITATIVE SOFTWARE AMPLIFICATION CELL BIOLOGY CLONING MICROARRAYS ANALYSIS & ANALYSIS PCR SOLUTIONS Don’t just get ahead, leap ahead. SideStep™ Lysis and Stabilization Products for Quantitative PCR. Stratagene’s new SideStep™ lysis and stabilization product line ensures accurate gene expression data by eliminating sample loss, and allows • Provides comparable results to purified RNA you to go directly from cells to a real-time quantitative PCR analysis • Saves time and increases sample throughput without RNA purification. RNA is stable in SideStep cell lysates for up to 6 months, giving you flexibility to perform future analysis without • Ideal for QRT-PCR and siRNA knockdown analyses harming sample integrity. Need More Information? Give Us A Call: Ask Us About These Great Products: Stratagene USA and Canada SideStep™ Lysis and Stabilization Buffer (100 rxn) 400900 Order: (800) 424-5444 x3 SideStep™ Lysis and Stabilization Buffer (50 rxn) 400901 Technical Services: (800) 894-1304 x2 SideStep™ mRNA Enrichment Kit 400902 Brilliant® SYBR® Green SideStep™ QPCR Master Mixa 400904 Stratagene Japan K.K. Brilliant® SideStep™ QRT-PCR Probe Master Mix, 1-stepa,b 400907 Order: 03-5159-2060 Technical Services: 03-5159-2070 a. Purchase of this product is accompanied by a license under the foreign counterparts of U.S. Patents Nos. 4,683,202, 4,683,195 and 4,965,188 for use in the polymerase chain reaction Stratagene Europe (PCR) process, where such process is covered by patents, in conjunction with a thermal Order: 00800-7000-7000 cycler whose use in the automated performance of the PCR process is covered by the up-front license fee, either by payment to Applied Biosystems or as purchased, i.e., an authorized Technical Services: 00800-7400-7400 thermal cycler.
    [Show full text]