Trafford Salford Manchester

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Trafford Salford Manchester S0210 G S0138 S0148 S0143 S0174 S0097 S0107 S0184 I L S0391 D S0382 S0428 North A B S0222 R S0137 O O S0112 S0178 K S0393 S0101 S0427 S0202 S0414 S0102 S0426 L L S0375 S0109 E W R I S0140 Y E R G 398000 Salford S0119 B L A NA S0111 CA HIP S0182 R S STE HE NC S0139 S0013 MA S0179 C M ED Manchester L OC S0128 K T U N S0415 S0127 N S0012 E L S ROCHDALE CANAL S0113 S0124 Trafford S0014 S0117 S0116 D S0122 S0017 S0120 S0118 M ED K S0016 M0042 L OC S0115 T0463 S0133 S0125 S0135 S0126 S0136 T0463 S0130 S0005 T0333 S0129 S0392 T0332 397000 S0114 S0123 Council Boundary Ashton, Bridgewater and T0467 Rochdale Canals S0132 T0322 Canal Overtop Hazard Zone Manchester Ship Canal / Grey Irwell T0471 Canal Overtop Hazard Zone S0121 Other Waterbodies S0131 Canal Breach Hazard Zone T0154 S0134 T0365 Main Rivers (V8.0) S0381 T0472 T0155 T0167 Canal Breach Zone A T0469 T0145 Culverted T0158 T0435 T0164 Canal Breach Zone B T0164 Open T0143 T0165 Oldham SFRA Canal Hazard Zone T0159 T0462 Digitised River Lines BRIDGEWATER CANAL T0149 T0147 Potential Development Sites / Locations Culverted T0321 Employment Open T0468 T0229 T0233 T0232 Housing C T0153 O T0162 R Mixed Use N B R T0234 O O K Other T0235 T0152 T0329 T0142 396000 T0440 T0320 Regional Centre Boundary T0228 T0227 T0352 T0146 This map has been produced in accordance with PPS25: Development and Flood Risk. T0151 T0160 Two indicative "Canal Hazard Zones" have been created for the Bridgewater, Ashton and Rochdale T0460 T0445 Canals. These have been generated using broadscale 2D modelling to show areas that could potentially be affected by flooding in the event of LONGF T0349 T0455 T0438 •Canal Overtop Hazard Zone ORD BR OOK T0163 •Canal Breach Hazard Zone. T0359 T0323 T0470 T0170 The potential breach locations / areas were sub-divided into two Canal Breach Zones: •Canal Breach Zone A. A walkover survey of the canal was undertaken to identify the embankments T0226 T0408 more likely to breach, based on their height and width. This zone shows those areas that would be T0161 affected by a breach of one of these embankments. In this zone a detailed examination of canal T0358 breach flood risks is required in a site specific FRA. •Canal Breach Zone B. Less likely breach locations, such as at wide, low or very low embankments, were identified by a walkover survey of the canal. At such locations it is more likely that this source of risk could be scoped out within any site specific FRA. T0169 T0225 T0328 It should be noted that these outlines are based on broadscale modelling techniques and T0144 T0157 should only be taken as an indication of areas that might be at risk and inform Flood Risk Assessments. There are a number of uncertainties associated with the simulation of flooding from T0148 canals in either overtopping or breach conditions. The assumptions behind the modelling should be considered when using and reviewing the hazard zones that have been produced. Full details of the methodology used to derive Canal Hazard Zones is provided in Chapter 3 of the Level 2 SFRA and T0299 T0350 T0357 T0351 guidance on the use of the Canal Hazard Zones is provided in Chapter 3 of the SFRA User Guide. T0356 T0404 T0454 T0325 T0298 T0297 T0150 T0325 The Canal Hazard Zone resulting in a breach from the Rochdale Canal in Oldham has also been T0456 included on the map and has been taken from the Oldham SFRA (2010). This was based on a similar broadscale methodology. 395000 T0324 Interactions between the Bridgewater Canal and the River Medlock in Castlefield may result in overtopping of the Canal during severe weather events, as shown elsewhere in the SFRA. For further information please see the Level 2 SFRA Chapter 3. T0174 T0348 The Main River information shown in the SFRA is provided by the Environment Agency; the centreline data may deviate from that shown on basemapping due to inherent differences in data resolution. T0307 Further information on Main Rivers is provided on the Environment Agency’s website. The mapping of culverted sections of watercourse is a strategic screening only based upon Ordnance Survey 1:10,000 mapping and should be confirmed for more detailed studies such as site specific Flood Risk Assessment. The canals layer does not necessarily cover all the canal arms, but the modelled T0224 overtopping/breaching and hydraulic interactions with rivers and other waterbodies is complete and T0175 accurate as appropriate for a Strategic Flood Risk Assessment. T0330 T0432 T0310 The River Irwell between Victoria Station and Pomona Island is not shown as a Main River on the T0452 T0392 Environment Agency's Flood Map although Flood Zones related to the river are. The same approach T0331 T0309 has been taken in this SFRA. T0182 T0457 T0433 T0473 The map should be considered when applying the Sequential Test and used to scope the inclusion of T0308 T0156 T0396 canal flood risk within a site specific FRA. OK T0326 A BR O T0443 D EE T0166 OL T0354 www.jeremybenn.co.uk T0361 t 01925 570876 f 0845 8627772 e [email protected] T0360 T0355 Bank Quay House Sankey Street 394000 T0327 M0038 Warrington WA1 1NN T0353 United Kingdom Other offices at Atherstone, Doncaster, Edinburgh, Haywards Heath, Limerick, T0464 Newcastle upon Tyne, Newport, Northallerton, Saltaire, Skipton, Tadcaster & T0223 Wallingford for LOW VERF MERSEY O Manchester City, Salford City and Trafford Y E S R Councils Level 2 Hybrid SFRA M E Canal Hazard Zones Y E S R E M Drawn by: J Cheetham Date: 15/03/2011 This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller CH Checked by: Date: of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. ORLTON J Dimelow 01/02/2011 B PLATT GOR E Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and A R may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence R O Approved by: Date: number: 100019568 2011. W J Cooper 01/02/2011 B R O O File Name: K ...ArcView\Mapping\Level2\MST_Canal_Hazard_V1.3.mxd T0128 Drawing Number: Status: Scale: 0 0.5 1 393000 Kilometre 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MM_3.2C FINAL 1:10,000 0 MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 O OR 0 T R D 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 S B 8 9 0 1 2 3 7 RO 7 7 8 8 8 8 3 O 3 3 3 3 3 3 Original @ A1 K.
Recommended publications
  • A Beginner's Guide to Boating on Inland Waterways
    Ti r A Beginner’s Guide To Boating On Inland Waterways Take to the water with British Waterways and the National Rivers Authority With well over 4,000 km (2,500 miles) of rivers and canals to explore, from the south west of England up to Scotland, our inland waterways offer plenty of variety for both the casual boater and the dedicated enthusiast. If you have ever experienced the pleasures of 'messing about on boats', you will know what a wealth of scenery and heritage inland waterways open up to us, and the unique perspective they provide. Boating is fun and easy. This pack is designed to help you get afloat if you are thinking about buying a boat. Amongst other useful information, it includes details of: Navigation Authorities British Waterways (BW) and the National Rivers Authority (NRA), which is to become part of the new Environment Agency for England and Wales on 1 April 1996, manage most of our navigable rivers and canals. We are responsible for maintaining the waterways and locks, providing services for boaters and we licence and manage boats. There are more than 20 smaller navigation authorities across the country. We have included information on some of these smaller organisations. Licences and Moorings We tell you everything you need to know from, how to apply for a licence to how to find a permanent mooring or simply a place for «* ^ V.’j provide some useful hints on buying a boat, includi r, ...V; 'r 1 builders, loans, insurance and the Boat Safety Sch:: EKVIRONMENT AGENCY Useful addresses A detailed list of useful organisations and contacts :: : n a t io n a l libra ry'& ■ suggested some books we think will help you get t information service Happy boating! s o u t h e r n r e g i o n Guildbourne House, Chatsworth Road, W orthing, West Sussex BN 11 1LD ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 1 Owning a Boat Buying a Boat With such a vast.range of boats available to suit every price range, .
    [Show full text]
  • Screening Opinion on the Impact of the Oldham MBC Air Quality
    HABITAT REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT OF THE ROCHDALE LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Prepared by The Greater Manchester Ecology Unit Council Offices Wellington Road Ashton-under-Lyne Manchester OL6 6DL For Rochdale Council September 2013 CONTENTS 1 Introduction 2 Brief description of the Plan 3 Identification of European designated sites concerned 4 The Nature Conservation Interest of the South Pennine Moors SAC/SPA and the Rochdale Canal SAC 5 Screening Opinion 6 Consideration of ‘in combination effects’ 7 Conclusions and Recommendations 8 Changes to Rochdale’s Strategy for Flood Risk Management in response to the recommendations of the Habitats Regulations Assessment References Figure 1: Map Showing Location of European Sites within Rochdale APPENDIX 1: European designated sites within the North West Region and possible effects from development within Rochdale APPENDIX 2: Screening Summary of European designated sites within the North West Region and possible impacts from development within Rochdale APPENDIX 3: List of Other Plans and Projects Considered within the Assessment 1 Introduction 1.1 Article 6(3) of the European Habitats Directive dealing with the conservation of European protected sites states that: ‘Any plan or project not directly connected with or necessary to the management of the site but likely to have a significant effect thereon, either individually or in combination with other plans and projects, shall be subject to assessment of its implications for the site in view of the site’s conservation objectives. In light
    [Show full text]
  • Waterway Dimensions
    Generated by waterscape.com Dimension Data The data published in this documentis British Waterways’ estimate of the dimensions of our waterways based upon local knowledge and expertise. Whilst British Waterways anticipates that this data is reasonably accurate, we cannot guarantee its precision. Therefore, this data should only be used as a helpful guide and you should always use your own judgement taking into account local circumstances at any particular time. Aire & Calder Navigation Goole to Leeds Lock tail - Bulholme Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom - 6.3m 2.74m - - 20.67ft 8.99ft - Castleford Lock is limiting due to the curvature of the lock chamber. Goole to Leeds Lock tail - Castleford Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom 61m - - - 200.13ft - - - Heck Road Bridge is now lower than Stubbs Bridge (investigations underway), which was previously limiting. A height of 3.6m at Heck should be seen as maximum at the crown during normal water level. Goole to Leeds Lock tail - Heck Road Bridge Length Beam Draught Headroom - - - 3.71m - - - 12.17ft - 1 - Generated by waterscape.com Leeds Lock tail to River Lock tail - Leeds Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom - 5.5m 2.68m - - 18.04ft 8.79ft - Pleasure craft dimensions showing small lock being limiting unless by prior arrangement to access full lock giving an extra 43m. Leeds Lock tail to River Lock tail - Crown Point Bridge Length Beam Draught Headroom - - - 3.62m - - - 11.88ft Crown Point Bridge at summer levels Wakefield Branch - Broadreach Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom - 5.55m 2.7m - - 18.21ft 8.86ft - Pleasure craft dimensions showing small lock being limiting unless by prior arrangement to access full lock giving an extra 43m.
    [Show full text]
  • Source 12 AW.Indd
    Words Deborah Mulhearn Photographs Ian Lawson, Walter Menzies and courtesy British Waterways Cheshire’s beautiful and fascinating canals are at the forefront of the nation’s canal renaissance. Cheshire’s canals are perhaps the most diverse in the ago – to young and distinctly urban The Peak Forest Canal touches country. From the fascinating industrial heritage of the landlubbers are negotiating the locks. Boating Cheshire only briefl y, but has one of mighty Manchester Ship Canal, which cuts across the holiday companies are doing great business. its most spectacular features: the Northern edge of the county, to the dramatic Pennine The Cheshire Ring, a 97 mile long circular Marple Aqueduct and the fl ight of 16 scenery of the Macclesfi eld Canal in the east, and the route which is made up from parts of the locks that lift the canal 46m above serene beauty of the Llangollen Canal in the south-west Macclesfi eld Canal, the Peak Forest Canal, the Goyt Valley. The Trent & Mersey corner, they not only cover most of the county but also the Bridgewater Canal and the Trent & Mersey Canal, built to link the River Trent span the history of British canal building. Canal, has never been busier. and the River Mersey, was one of the Cheshire’s proximity to Liverpool and Manchester, “There’s a weird and wonderful mix of earliest canals to be completed, in the hub and heart of the industrial revolution, and to the features specifi c to Cheshire’s canals,” 1777. It runs for 92 miles and has River Mersey, meant that it was quickly criss-crossed explains Peter Birch of British Waterways even more locks – one section with by canals in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment – Thematic Policies and Strategic Sites
    Habitats Regulations Assessment (draft) of the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework Consultation Report – Thematic Policies and Strategic Sites December 2018 3 Prepared by The Greater Manchester Ecology Unit Clarence Arcade Stamford Street Clarence Arcade Ashton-under-Lyne OL6 6DL [email protected] For: GM Combined Authority December 2018 4 [Type text] TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction 2 Brief Description of the Plan 3 Identification of European designated sites concerned 4 The Nature Conservation Interests of the “Screened In” European Sites 5 Initial Screening Opinion – Policies and Strategic Sites 6 Assessment of Impacts and Available Mitigation – Policies 7 Assessment of Impacts and Available Mitigation – Strategic Sites 8 Consideration of ‘In Combination’ Effects with Other Plans and Proposals 9 Overall Conclusions and Recommendations For Further Screening / Appropriate Assessment References APPENDIX 1: Other Plans considered in this Assessment as part of in-combination Assessment HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT OF THE GREATER MANCHESTER SPATIAL FRAMEWORK – THEMATIC POLICIES AND STRATEGIC SITES 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Paragraph 6(3) of the European Habitats Directive dealing with the conservation of European protected sites states that: 6(3).—(1) A competent authority, before deciding to undertake, or give any consent, permission or other authorisation for, a plan or project which— (a) is likely to have a significant effect on a European site or a European offshore marine site (either alone or in combination with other plans or projects), and (b) is not directly connected with or necessary to the management of that site, must make an appropriate assessment of the implications of the plan or project for that site in view of that site’s conservation objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • English Nature Research Report 75
    4 CANALS AS AQUATIC CORRIDORS 4.1 INTRODUCTION The term 'corridor' can be used to describe two different situations. In the first, the corridor is simply a passage along which organisms travel. or along which propagules are dispersed. Thus, one can imagine a butterfly or a bird passing from one wood to another along a hedge, or a seed floating along a stream from one lake to another. The second situation is the corridor as a linear habitat in which organisms live and reproduce. This section of the report considers British canals as linear habitats for submerged and floating vascular plants. A study of the plants which have colonized canals is of interest for two reasons. Canals are of intrinsic importance, as they contain significant populations of many scarce or rare aquatic macrophytes. They are unstable habitats: if neglected they gradually become overgrown by emergent vegetation but if maintained and intensively used by boat traffic they also lose much of their botanical diversity (Murphy & Eaton 1983). The restoration of canals for pleasure boating has been a controversial issue in recent years, and the management of the Basingstoke Canal. in particular, has been a subject of heated debate (see Byfield 1990). Proposals to use canals as part of a national water grid may also need to be evaluated by conservationists, and a knowledge of the dispersal behaviour and colonizing ability of both native and alien species will be essential if the consequences of linking canals are to be predicted. 4.2 REPRODUCTION AND DISPERSAL IN THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT In considering aquatic corridors, an important feature of aquatic plants must be borne in mind: the prevalence of vegetative reproduction in many genera.
    [Show full text]
  • Boats on the Huddersfield Narrow Canal
    Huddersfield Narrow Canal Fact File Did you know? The Huddersfield Narrow Canal cuts right through the Pennines, a mountain range that runs down the centre of Northern England. canalrivertrust.org.uk/explorers Why not print this page out on A3 and see if you can spot the tunnel, reservoirs and Huddersfield? This picture was taken in Huddersfield. What do you think the path next to the canal was for? Timeline 1794 Work starts on building the canal. 1797 The first section of canal is finished and opened. 1810 First boat passes through Standedge Tunnel. 1811 The Huddersfield Narrow Canal officially opens. 1833 Official leggers hired to work in the tunnel. 1845 Canal joins with Huddersfield Railway Co. 1847 Canal and Railway Company taken over by the London & North Western Railway Company. 1921 Last working boat goes through Standedge Tunnel. 1944 Canal abandoned by Act of Parliament. 1951 Most of the locks are removed and replaced with concrete weirs. 1974 Huddersfield Canal Society formed to restore the canal. 2001 After years of surveys, fundraising, hard work and meetings, the canal is brought back to life. Once again boats can navigate the whole 20 mile length of the canal. 2001 Standedge Tunnel and visitor canalriverexplorers.org.uk Map of the Huddersfield Narrow Canal. centre are officially opened. A Canal through the Pennines When the idea for a canal crossing the Pennines was thought up, it must have seemed a strange idea to many people. In order to travel up or down hill by boat locks are needed. However, demand for a canal to link the east and west of the country was so great that 3 were eventually built across this bleak and difficult land.
    [Show full text]
  • Openness & Accountability Mailing List
    Openness & Accountability Mailing List AINA Amateur Rowing Association Anglers Conservation Association APCO Association of Waterway Cruising Clubs British Boating Federation British Canoe Union British Marine Federation Canal & Boat Builder’s Association CCPR Commercial Boat Operators Association Community Boats Association Country Landowners Association Cyclist’s Touring Club Historic Narrow Boat Owners Club Inland Waterways Association IWAAC Local Government Association NAHFAC National Association of Boat Owners National Community Boats Association National Federation of Anglers Parliamentary Waterways Group Rambler’s Association The Yacht Harbour Association Residential Boat Owner’s Association Royal Yachting Association Southern Canals Association Steam Boat Association Thames Boating Trades Association Thames Traditional Boat Society The Barge Association Upper Avon Navigation Trust Wooden Canal Boat Society ABSE AINA Amber Valley Borough Council Ash Tree Boat Club Ashby Canal Association Ashby Canal Trust Association of Canal Enterprises Aylesbury Canal Society 1 Aylesbury Vale District Council B&MK Trust Barnsley, Dearne & & Dover Canal Trust Barnet Borough Council Basingstoke Canal Authority Basingstoke Canal Authority Basingstoke Canal Authority Bassetlaw District Council Bath North East Somerset Council Bedford & Milton Keynes Waterway Trust Bedford Rivers Users Group Bedfordshire County Council Birmingham City Council Boat Museum Society Chair Bolton Metropolitan Council Borough of Milton Keynes Brent Council Bridge 19-40
    [Show full text]
  • Site Improvement Plan Rochdale Canal
    Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 Sites (IPENS) Planning for the Future Site Improvement Plan Rochdale Canal Site Improvement Plans (SIPs) have been developed for each Natura 2000 site in England as part of the Improvement Programme for England's Natura 2000 sites (IPENS). Natura 2000 sites is the combined term for sites designated as Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Special Protected Areas (SPA). This work has been financially supported by LIFE, a financial instrument of the European Community. The plan provides a high level overview of the issues (both current and predicted) affecting the condition of the Natura 2000 features on the site(s) and outlines the priority measures required to improve the condition of the features. It does not cover issues where remedial actions are already in place or ongoing management activities which are required for maintenance. The SIP consists of three parts: a Summary table, which sets out the priority Issues and Measures; a detailed Actions table, which sets out who needs to do what, when and how much it is estimated to cost; and a set of tables containing contextual information and links. Once this current programme ends, it is anticipated that Natural England and others, working with landowners and managers, will all play a role in delivering the priority measures to improve the condition of the features on these sites. The SIPs are based on Natural England's current evidence and knowledge. The SIPs are not legal documents, they are live documents that will be updated to reflect changes in our evidence/knowledge and as actions get underway.
    [Show full text]
  • Canal Restrictions by Boat Size
    Aire & Calder Navigation The main line is 34.0 miles (54.4 km) long and has 11 locks. The Wakefield Branch is 7.5 miles (12 km) long and has 4 locks. The navigable river Aire to Haddlesey is 6.5 miles (10.4 km) long and has 2 locks. The maximum boat size that can navigate the full main line is length: 200' 2" (61.0 metres) - Castleford Lock beam: 18' 1" (5.5 metres) - Leeds Lock height: 11' 10" (3.6 metres) - Heck Road Bridge draught: 8' 9" (2.68 metres) - cill of Leeds Lock The maximum boat size that can navigate the Wakefield Branch is length: 141' 0" (42.9 metres) beam: 18' 3" (5.55 metres) - Broadreach Lock height: 11' 10" (3.6 metres) draught: 8' 10" (2.7 metres) - cill of Broadreach Lock Ashby Canal The maximum size of boat that can navigate the Ashby Canal is length: There are no locks to limit length beam: 8' 2" (2.49 metres) - Safety Gate near Marston Junction height: 8' 8" (2.64 metres) - Bridge 15a draught: 4' 7" (1.39 metres) Ashton Canal The maximum boat length that can navigate the Ashton Canal is length: 74' 0" (22.5 metres) - Lock 2 beam: 7' 3" (2.2 metres) - Lock 4 height: 6' 5" (1.95 metres) - Bridge 21 (Lumb Lane) draught: 3' 7" (1.1 metres) - cill of Lock 9 Avon Navigation The maximum size of boat that navigate throughout the Avon Navigation is length: 70' (21.3 metres) beam: 12' 6" (3.8 metres) height: 10' (3.0 metres) draught: 4' 0" (1.2 metres) - reduces to 3' 0" or less towards Alveston Weir Basingstoke Canal The maximum size of boat that can navigate the Basingstoke Canal is length: 72' (21.9 metres) beam: 13'
    [Show full text]
  • Walks & Cycle Routes
    Dainewell Woods Carrington Walks & Cycle Routes Works Moss Glazebrook Cadishead Sinderland Brook Bollin Valley Way Glaze & Footpath Junctions Brook 245* B5212 Trans Pennine Trail (NCN 62) 247 Cheshire Ring Canal Walk A57 Broadheath Dunham Circular Cycle Ride Sinderland 247 N. Tatton Cycle Trail 'A' PARTINGTON Green Dairy- house Bridleway P R T i 245 A6144 Farm * Permissive Bridleway Redbrook Crematorium Higher House Other Public Footpaths 247 247 Permissive Footpaths Hollins P R Green T Red House Farm P KEY Mosshall Black Moss Farm Farm 13 Roads Peterhouse Oldfield Brow 1ml Fences/Hedges B5159 Farm Bridgewater 1.6km Canals / Rivers Canal 13 Altrincham Toll B M Lakes / Reservoirs Bridge A57 5 B5160 National Trust Properties 38 38 P Golf Course Railway Mossbrow Higher Carr N Warburton Green Farm Built-up Area 5 Buildings Manchester Dunham Town Ship Canal 38 Forest / Woodland Dunham Woodhouses 38 B5160 Bowdon B5160 Picnic Site 37, 37A River Bollin , P Parking Dunham 38, 289 Aqueduct Dunham Park Country Pub Bollin P R T i R Other Refreshment Point T Toilets Heatley 37, 37A, 289 i Information Little Train Station B5159 Bollington B5161 A56 M Metro Link A6144 B Bus Station 5 New Farm 38 38 Bus Services Agden 37, 37A See overleaf for details Bridge A56 P R T i 1 km Access Involves Steps LYMM P © Crown copyright. All rights reserved. 289 M56 1 mile Cheshire County Council Licence No.100019582.2004 A56 Tatton Park 5mls. A556 Jn 8 The Bollin Valley Way and other recreational routes between Bowdon and Partington, including Dunham Massey. they are reasonably level – please ring and check.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Grand Junction Canal in Berkhamsted, 1760-1825 This
    Development of Grand Junction Canal in Berkhamsted, 1760-1825 This step in the national transport revolution was conducted under the shadow of the French Revolutionary War in 1793 when coastal shipping became vulnerable and movement of goods was brought inland. Earlier successful canal- building ventures had captured the attention of investors and speculators; canal mania was underway and local aristocracy and gentry were in the forefront, influencing decisions about transport, either to exploit mineral wealth or to ensure that traffic was diverted outside their estates (unless they could see advantages with allowing passage across their land). The Grand Junction Canal was particularly versatile in handling full size narrow boats and barges; it was the longest wide-gauge canal in Britain and traders benefited from lower transport costs for non-time-dependent and bulky items. Before the canal Whereas there was a usable road before the turnpike, the River Bulbourne was not commercially viable for bulk carriage of freight prior to the canal. It was referred to as a winterbourne river in the upper reaches because it often dried out during the summer.1 An analysis of peat deposits has revealed that an undeveloped area adjacent to the river was waterlogged and boggy from early times, probably due to the construction of the millpond at Upper Mill which was one of two mills recorded in Domesday.2 It was this tendency to flood that caused severe problems for the town that were alleviated only with the arrival of the canal. The Bridgewater family was influential in the affairs of the turnpike trust, but the Duke of Bridgewater was better known as the “father of inland navigation”.3 The Bridgewater Canal connected his coal mines at Worsley with the river Mersey and opened up new markets for his coal.
    [Show full text]