Presentación Del Curso

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Presentación Del Curso i Presentación del Curso Biología de Campo es un curso diseñado especialmente para estudiantes de grado de la Escuela de Biología de la Universidad de Costa Rica. Este tiene como principal objetivo introducir a los estudiantes al trabajo de campo en los trópicos. La metodología radica en enseñar al estudiante a formular preguntas, enfrentándolo al desarrollo adecuado de diseños experimentales, así como al análisis e interpretación de la información. La filosofía del curso es el desarrollo de proyectos cortos en historia natural sin dejar de lado el diseño de estudios a largo plazo. Por sexta vez se desarrolla en la región de Golfito, desde el 5 de enero al 2 de febrero del 2001. Golfito se convierte en una zona de mucho provecho para este tipo de actividades puesto que permite tanto la realización de proyectos dirigidos al ambiente terrestre como al marino, sin dejar por fuera las facilidades y lo que representa estar en uno de los centros de población de la zona sur de Costa Rica. En total hubo 16 estudiantes; 8 del grado, de los que dos son de la del Intercambio de Estudiantes de Alemania en la Universidad, y el mismo número del Sistema de Estudios de Posgrado en Biología. Participaron 12 profesores visitantes todos de la Escuela de Biología. Antes del viaje a Golfito se realizaron algunas actividades que involucraron dos conferencias introductorias a la zona y una pequeña capacitación en el uso de hojas electrónicas y paquetes estadísticos realizada en el Laboratorio de Cómputo de la Escuela. Las conferencias fueron: “Diversidad Marina” por Jorge Cortés de la Escuela de Biología y “Geología de la Zona Sur del País” por Percy Denyer de la Escuela de Geología. En Golfito la mayoría de los profesores invitados brindaron una conferencia sobre aspectos biológicos de su interés. También contamos con la participación de Claudio Barrantes, quien ofreció la charla “Historia de la Compañía Bananera en la Zona Sur”. Se contó con cuatro periodos de tres días para realizar los proyectos de grupo, dirigidos por los profesores invitados, el coordinador o los asistentes, y el resto del tiempo para que los estudiantes realizaran su proyecto individual. La mayoría de los proyectos se hicieron en el día, pero dos proyectos de grupo y tres individuales fueron realizados en horas de la noche. En este tipo de cursos son muchas las personas que colaboran, y es por lo que deseamos agradecer a quienes hicieron posible que éste se realizara. Muy especialmente a Hernán Camacho y la Escuela de Biología por apoyar y financiar el curso. A los profesores visitantes, sin los que no se podría lograr el resultado que aquí vemos. A Claudio Barrantes, Margarita Silva y a todo el personal de la Universidad y FUNDEVI en Golfito que hacen posible que el curso cuente con áreas para alojamiento, alimentación y trabajo apropiadas para el buen desarrollo. A la sección de transportes que facilita la entrada y salida de profesores visitantes como de todo el grupo al principio y al final, así como del transporte en el campo. La mayoría del equipo es de la Escuela, sin embargo el Centro de Investigaciones Marinas y el programa de la Universidad de Kansas facilitaron parte de éste. Muy especialmente a Doña Olga y a Piano; y a la maravillosa cuchara de Marta, gran amiga y compañera en todo el tiempo de estadía en Golfito. ii Índice Presentación del Curso ...........................................................................................................i Índice .....................................................................................................................................ii Estudiantes ............................................................................................................................v Profesores Visitantes .............................................................................................................v Coordinador............................................................................................................................v Asistentes...............................................................................................................................v Frases Célebres .....................................................................................................................vi Fotografías ...........................................................................................................................vii El Grupo .................................................................................................................................vii Eduardo, Olman, Marco y Compañía......................................................................................... viii Marta y Familia....................................................................................................................... viii William, Monika y Jorge.............................................................................................................ix José, Álvaro y Margarita ............................................................................................................ix Ana, Federico y José Manuel...................................................................................................... x Lauro, Rodolfo, Andrea y Daniel.................................................................................................x Pablo.......................................................................................................................................xi Silvia .......................................................................................................................................xi Katya......................................................................................................................................xii Esteban ..................................................................................................................................xii Melvin.................................................................................................................................... xiii Tania..................................................................................................................................... xiii Ramsa ................................................................................................................................... xiv Erik ....................................................................................................................................... xiv Eunice ....................................................................................................................................xv Loretta....................................................................................................................................xv Branko................................................................................................................................... xvi Ivonne................................................................................................................................... xvi Jorge.................................................................................................................................... xvii Jorge Arturo.......................................................................................................................... xvii Licidia.................................................................................................................................. xviii Katja ................................................................................................................................... xviii Algunos Dormían con Derecho ................................................................................................. xix Otros No................................................................................................................................ xix Dibujos .................................................................................................................................xx Proyectos de Grupo................................................................................................................1 Efecto de velocidad de corriente y disponibilidad de alimento sobre el comportamiento de hemípteros patinadores............................................................................................................. 3 Pablo Esteban Allen Monge........................................................................................................ 3 Efecto de la especie de planta, forma, distancia y presencia de epífilos en la colección de hojas por Atta colombica (Attini, Formicidae)........................................................................................... 11 Silvia Álvarez Clare.................................................................................................................. 11 Movimiento del polen en flores de Pseudobombax septenatum .................................................. 17 Katya Barrantes Salas ............................................................................................................. 17 Factores que influyen sobre el desplazamiento y preferencia de percha de Hetaerina sp. (Zygoptera: Calopterygidae) ...................................................................................................................... 23 Esteban Bermúdez R............................................................................................................... 23 Uso del espacio por comunidades vegetales.............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Spiders of the Hawaiian Islands: Catalog and Bibliography1
    Pacific Insects 6 (4) : 665-687 December 30, 1964 SPIDERS OF THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS: CATALOG AND BIBLIOGRAPHY1 By Theodore W. Suman BISHOP MUSEUM, HONOLULU, HAWAII Abstract: This paper contains a systematic list of species, and the literature references, of the spiders occurring in the Hawaiian Islands. The species total 149 of which 17 are record­ ed here for the first time. This paper lists the records and literature of the spiders in the Hawaiian Islands. The islands included are Kure, Midway, Laysan, French Frigate Shoal, Kauai, Oahu, Molokai, Lanai, Maui and Hawaii. The only major work dealing with the spiders in the Hawaiian Is. was published 60 years ago in " Fauna Hawaiiensis " by Simon (1900 & 1904). All of the endemic spiders known today, except Pseudanapis aloha Forster, are described in that work which also in­ cludes a listing of several introduced species. The spider collection available to Simon re­ presented only a small part of the entire Hawaiian fauna. In all probability, the endemic species are only partly known. Since the appearance of Simon's work, there have been many new records and lists of introduced spiders. The known Hawaiian spider fauna now totals 149 species and 4 subspecies belonging to 21 families and 66 genera. Of this total, 82 species (5596) are believed to be endemic and belong to 10 families and 27 genera including 7 endemic genera. The introduced spe­ cies total 65 (44^). Two unidentified species placed in indigenous genera comprise the remaining \%. Seventeen species are recorded here for the first time. In the catalog section of this paper, families, genera and species are listed alphabetical­ ly for convenience.
    [Show full text]
  • Records of the Hawaii Biological Survey for 1996
    Records of the Hawaii Biological Survey for 1996. Bishop Museum Occasional Papers 49, 71 p. (1997) RECORDS OF THE HAWAII BIOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR 1996 Part 2: Notes1 This is the second of 2 parts to the Records of the Hawaii Biological Survey for 1996 and contains the notes on Hawaiian species of protists, fungi, plants, and animals includ- ing new state and island records, range extensions, and other information. Larger, more comprehensive treatments and papers describing new taxa are treated in the first part of this Records [Bishop Museum Occasional Papers 48]. Foraminifera of Hawaii: Literature Survey THOMAS A. BURCH & BEATRICE L. BURCH (Research Associates in Zoology, Hawaii Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, HI 96817, USA) The result of a compilation of a checklist of Foraminifera of the Hawaiian Islands is a list of 755 taxa reported in the literature below. The entire list is planned to be published as a Bishop Museum Technical Report. This list also includes other names that have been applied to Hawaiian foraminiferans. Loeblich & Tappan (1994) and Jones (1994) dis- agree about which names should be used; therefore, each is cross referenced to the other. Literature Cited Bagg, R.M., Jr. 1980. Foraminifera collected near the Hawaiian Islands by the Steamer Albatross in 1902. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 34(1603): 113–73. Barker, R.W. 1960. Taxonomic notes on the species figured by H. B. Brady in his report on the Foraminifera dredged by HMS Challenger during the years 1873–1876. Soc. Econ. Paleontol. Mineral. Spec. Publ. 9, 239 p. Belford, D.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas
    Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas Neal L. Evenhuis, Lucius G. Eldredge, Keith T. Arakaki, Darcy Oishi, Janis N. Garcia & William P. Haines Pacific Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817 Final Report November 2010 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish & Wildlife Office Honolulu, Hawaii Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 2 BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai’i 96817–2704, USA Copyright© 2010 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Contribution No. 2010-015 to the Pacific Biological Survey Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 5 Background ..................................................................................................................... 7 General History .............................................................................................................. 10 Previous Expeditions to Pagan Surveying Terrestrial Arthropods ................................ 12 Current Survey and List of Collecting Sites .................................................................. 18 Sampling Methods ......................................................................................................... 25 Survey Results ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Populations 501
    CHAPTER 19 | THE EVOLUTION OF POPULATIONS 501 19 | THE EVOLUTION OF POPULATIONS Figure 19.1 Living things may be single-celled or complex, multicellular organisms. They may be plants, animals, fungi, bacteria, or archaea. This diversity results from evolution. (credit "wolf": modification of work by Gary Kramer; credit "coral": modification of work by William Harrigan, NOAA; credit "river": modification of work by Vojtěch Dostál; credit "fish" modification of work by Christian Mehlführer; credit "mushroom": modification of work by Cory Zanker; credit "tree": modification of work by Joseph Kranak; credit "bee": modification of work by Cory Zanker) Chapter Outline 19.1: Population Evolution 19.2: Population Genetics 19.3: Adaptive Evolution Introduction All life on Earth is related. Evolutionary theory states that humans, beetles, plants, and bacteria all share a common ancestor, but that millions of years of evolution have shaped each of these organisms into the forms seen today. Scientists consider evolution a key concept to understanding life. Natural selection is one of the most dominant evolutionary forces. Natural selection acts to promote traits and behaviors that increase an organism’s chances of survival and reproduction, while eliminating those traits and behaviors that are to the organism’s detriment. But natural selection can only, as its name implies, select—it cannot create. The introduction of novel traits and behaviors falls on the shoulders of another evolutionary force—mutation. Mutation and other sources of variation among individuals, as well as the evolutionary forces that act upon them, alter populations and species. This combination of processes has led to the world of life we see today.
    [Show full text]
  • Spider Community Composition and Structure in a Shrub-Steppe Ecosystem: the Effects of Prey Availability and Shrub Architecture
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2012 Spider Community Composition and Structure In A Shrub-Steppe Ecosystem: The Effects of Prey Availability and Shrub Architecture Lori R. Spears Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Spears, Lori R., "Spider Community Composition and Structure In A Shrub-Steppe Ecosystem: The Effects of Prey Availability and Shrub Architecture" (2012). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 1207. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/1207 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPIDER COMMUNITY COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE IN A SHRUB-STEPPE ECOSYSTEM: THE EFFECTS OF PREY AVAILABILITY AND SHRUB ARCHITECTURE by Lori R. Spears A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Ecology Approved: ___________________________ ___________________________ James A. MacMahon Edward W. Evans Major Professor Committee Member ___________________________ ___________________________ S.K. Morgan Ernest Ethan P. White Committee Member Committee Member ___________________________ ___________________________ Eugene W. Schupp Mark R. McLellan Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2012 ii Copyright © Lori R. Spears 2012 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Spider Community Composition and Structure in a Shrub-Steppe Ecosystem: The Effects of Prey Availability and Shrub Architecture by Lori R.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring Within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘I: Synthesis Report
    Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Prepared by Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Hawaii Biological Survey Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817 USA Prepared for EKNA Services Inc. 615 Pi‘ikoi Street, Suite 300 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96814 and State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Airports Division Bishop Museum Technical Report 58 Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i Copyright 2012 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1085-455X Contribution No. 2012 001 to the Hawaii Biological Survey COVER Adult male Hawaiian long-horned wood-borer, Plagithmysus kahului, on its host plant Chenopodium oahuense. This species is endemic to lowland Maui and was discovered during the arthropod surveys. Photograph by Forest and Kim Starr, Makawao, Maui. Used with permission. Hawaii Biological Report on Monitoring Arthropods within Kahului Airport Environs, Synthesis TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents …………….......................................................……………...........……………..…..….i. Executive Summary …….....................................................…………………...........……………..…..….1 Introduction ..................................................................………………………...........……………..…..….4
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae (Spider) Photos
    Araneae (Spider) Photos Araneae (Spiders) About Information on: Spider Photos of Links to WWW Spiders Spiders of North America Relationships Spider Groups Spider Resources -- An Identification Manual About Spiders As in the other arachnid orders, appendage specialization is very important in the evolution of spiders. In spiders the five pairs of appendages of the prosoma (one of the two main body sections) that follow the chelicerae are the pedipalps followed by four pairs of walking legs. The pedipalps are modified to serve as mating organs by mature male spiders. These modifications are often very complicated and differences in their structure are important characteristics used by araneologists in the classification of spiders. Pedipalps in female spiders are structurally much simpler and are used for sensing, manipulating food and sometimes in locomotion. It is relatively easy to tell mature or nearly mature males from female spiders (at least in most groups) by looking at the pedipalps -- in females they look like functional but small legs while in males the ends tend to be enlarged, often greatly so. In young spiders these differences are not evident. There are also appendages on the opisthosoma (the rear body section, the one with no walking legs) the best known being the spinnerets. In the first spiders there were four pairs of spinnerets. Living spiders may have four e.g., (liphistiomorph spiders) or three pairs (e.g., mygalomorph and ecribellate araneomorphs) or three paris of spinnerets and a silk spinning plate called a cribellum (the earliest and many extant araneomorph spiders). Spinnerets' history as appendages is suggested in part by their being projections away from the opisthosoma and the fact that they may retain muscles for movement Much of the success of spiders traces directly to their extensive use of silk and poison.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited
    Literature Cited References having one or two authors appear alphabetically by author and then by year. Citations having three or more authors appear alphabetically by first author and then are ordered by year, not alphabetically by subsequent authors. Foreign literature from languages having non-Roman scripts (Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Russian) are transliterated into Roman script. For these articles, titles trans- lated into English are frequently provided in the original. These are used whenever provided. Otherwise, I provide a translation of the title and place it in brackets to indicate that it is not from the original publication. For many of these articles, English summaries are also provided. I make note of that when applicable; other- wise, I simply note the original language of the article. For languages using Roman script, I don’t make note of the original language, presuming that will be self-evident. Abarca, J., and A.M. Monge. 2007. Geographic distribution: Hemidactylus mabouia. Herpetological Review 38: 351–352. Abbott, S.R. 1922. The horned lizard or toad (Phrynosoma cornutum). Maine Naturalist 2: 167–169. Achaval, F., and E. Gudnyas. 1983. Hallazgo de Tarentola mauritanica (L., 1758) (Lacertilia, Gekkonidae), en el Uruguay. Boletín de la Sociedad Zoologica del Uruguay, segunda epoca 1: 7–10. Achor, K.L., and P.E. Moler. 1982. Geographic distribution: Anolis equestris. Herpetological Review 13: 131. Acosta-Galvis, A.R. 2000. Ranas, salamandras y caecilias (Tetrapoda: Amphibia) de Colombia. Biota Colombiana 1: 289–319. Adams, C.K. 2007. Geographic distribution: Hemidactylus turcicus. Herpetological Review 38: 352. Adams, M.J. 1999. Correlated factors in amphibian decline: exotic species and habitat change in western Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrates Recorded from the Northern Marianas Islands Status 2002
    INVERTEBRATES RECORDED FROM THE NORTHERN MARIANAS ISLANDS STATUS 2002 O. BOURQUIN, CONSULTANT COLLECTIONS MANAGER : CNMI INVERTEBRATE COLLECTION CREES - NORTHERN MARIANAS COLLEGE, SAIPAN DECEMBER 2002 1 CONTENTS Page Introduction 3 Procedures 3 Problems and recommendations 5 Acknowledgements 11 Appendix 1 Policy and protocol for Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas (CNMI) invertebrate collection 12 Appendix 2 Taxa to be included in the CNMI collection 15 Appendix 3 Biodiversity of CNMI and its representation in CNMI collection 19 References 459 2 INTRODUCTION This report is based on work done under contract from March 1st 2001 to December 1st, 2002 on the CNMI Invertebrate collection, Northern Marianas College, Saipan. The collection was started by Dr. L.H. Hale during 1970, and was resurrected and expanded from 1979 due to the foresight and energy of Dr “Jack” Tenorio, who also contributed a great number of specimens. Originally the collection was intended as an insect collection to assist identification of insects affecting agriculture, horticulture and silviculture in the Northern Marianas, and to contribute to the ability of pupils and students to learn more about the subject. During 2001 the collection was expanded to include all terrestrial and freshwater invertebrates, and a collection management protocol was established (see Appendices 1 and 2). The collection was originally owned by the CNMI Department of Land and Natural Resources , and was on loan to the NMC Entomology Unit for curation. During 2001 it was transferred to the NMC by agreement with Dr. “Jack” Tenorio, who emphasized the need to maintain separate teaChing material as well as identified specimens in the main collection.
    [Show full text]
  • IV. Die Insel Guam
    MASTERARBEIT / MASTER’S THESIS Titel der Masterarbeit / Title of the Master’s Thesis „Biologische Invasionen und ihre Auswirkungen auf insulare Ökosysteme: Das Beispiel Guam” verfasst von / submitted by Birgit Kaiserlehner, BA angestrebter akademischer Grad / in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (MA) Wien, 2018 / Vienna, 2018 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt / A 066 805 degree programme code as it appears on the student record sheet: Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt / Masterstudium Globalgeschichte und degree programme as it appears on Global Studies the student record sheet: Betreut von / Supervisor: ao. Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Friedrich Edelmayer, MAS Ich möchte mich bei meinem Betreuer Prof. Mag. Dr. Friedrich Edelmayer, MAS für seine Unterstützung bedanken. Ferner gilt mein Dank meiner Mutter Ernestine, die mir mit Rat und Tat zur Seite stand. Ich widme diese Masterarbeit meinem Freund Patrick. Inhaltsverzeichnis I. Einleitung .................................................................................................... 5 II. Grundlagen .............................................................................................. 12 1. Biologische Invasionen: Definitionen und Begriffe.............................. 12 a) Die vielfältige Benennung fremder Spezies ....................................... 12 b) Das Problem der Grenzziehung zwischen „heimischen“ und „fremden“ Arten ................................................................................ 14 c) Der Vorwurf eines ökologischen
    [Show full text]
  • Su Yong Chao Dissertation.Ready to Submit0517
    A gang of thieves — evolution of cooperative kleptoparasitism in the subfamily Argyrodinae (Araneae: Theridiidae). By Yong-Chao Su University of Kansas, 2012 Submitted to the graduate degree program in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Chairperson : Deborah R. Smith ________________________________ Member : Rafe M. Brown ________________________________ Member : Bruce Cutler ________________________________ Member : Mark T. Holder ________________________________ Member : Paul A. Selden ________________________________ Member : Matthew Buechner Date Defended : May 14th , 2012 The Dissertation Committee for Yong-Chao Su certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: A gang of thieves — evolution of cooperative kleptoparasitism in the subfamily Argyrodinae (Araneae: Theridiidae). ________________________________ Chairperson : Deborah R. Smith Date approved: May 16th, 2012 ii Abstract This is the first comprehensive study of group-living behavior in kleptoparasitic Argyrodinae, and the first species level molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Argyrodinae (Araneae: Theridiidae). I included four research chapters in this dissertation. In Chapter 2, I showed the first empirical study of cooperative kleptoparasitism in Argyrodes miniaceus. The results showed that, at least at the level of foraging, group- living behavior has adaptive
    [Show full text]
  • Estimate of the Daily Catch of Prey by the Wasp Spider Argiope Bruennichi (Scopoli) in the Field: Original Data and Minireview
    Estimate of the daily catch of prey by the wasp spider Argiope bruennichi (Scopoli) in the field: Original data and minireview Martin nyffeler ABSTRACt Contrib. Nat. Hist. 12: 1007–1020. Prey capture by the large orb-weaving spider Argiope bruennichi (Scopoli) (aranei- dae) was investigated in uncut grassland (heavily infested with flowering weeds and shrubs) in the outskirts of Zurich, switzerland, on three consecutive days in early august (between 09:00 and 18:00 hours). A. bruennichi was found to be a predomin- antly diurnal predator of larger-sized grassland insects (Hymenoptera and ortho- ptera composing approx. 90% of the total prey biomass). on average, 38% of the encountered spiders were feeding. it is estimated that adult female A. bruennichi captured, on average, approx. 90 mg (fresh weight) prey web-1 day-1, which is the equivalent of the weight of a worker honey bee. My results were compared with the published estimates of other researchers. Keywords: Wasp spider, Argiope bruennichi, Araneidae, feeding frequency, prey cap- ture rate, uncut grassland, Zurich, Switzerland. introduction In recent years, orb-weaving spiders have become popular model systems to address questions in various fields of biology such as evolutionary biology, ecology, ethology, neurobiology, physiology, and even silk and venom chem- istry (e.g., Craig 1994; Elgar & al. 2000; Herberstein & al. 2005; Blackledge & Hayashi 2006; Schneider & al. 2005, 2006; Blamires & al. 2007, 2008; Brooks & al. 2008; Foellmer 2008), which makes it necessary to keep/breed these spiders under laboratory conditions (Zschokke & Herberstein 2005). "…Natural prey capture rates may provide helpful starting points when design- ing feeding regimes in the laboratory…" (Zschokke & Herberstein 2005).
    [Show full text]