sign in sign up
<<
Home , Ambulacraria, Coeloma, Deuterostome, Haikouella, Pikaia, Urbilaterian

ArXiv-Publication MICHAEL GUDO & TAREQ SYED Frankfurt am Main, 13.11.2008

100 of Deuterostomia (GROBBEN, 1908): Cladogenetic and Anagenetic Relations within the Notoneuralia

MICHAEL GUDO1 & TAREQ SYED2

Abstract

Results from molecular systematics and comparative developmental genetics changed the picture of meta- zoan and especially bilaterian radiation. According to this “new phylogeny” (introduced by ADOUTTE et al. 1999/2000), GROBBEN´S (1908) widely favoured - division of the can be upheld, but only with major rearrangements within these superphyla. On the cladogenetic level, the Protostomia are split into two unexpected subgroups, the and . The are split into the subgroups Chordata and , which is not novel since GROBBEN (1908) introduced the Deuterostomia in this way (together with the as a third line). However, many details of the new deuterostome phylogeny do not fit traditional, morphology-based reconstructions. As a consequence, three relatively unexpected proposals for early deuterostome evolution are favoured today: An ambulacraria-scenario, a xenoturbellid-scenario, and a -scenario. The first two proposals are often discussed in the literature, while the chordate-scenario is almost completely neglec- ted. Therefore, the paper presented focuses on the chordate scenario, i.e. the hypothesis of an acrania-like “ur-deuterostomian”. It is argued that the “acrania-hypothesis” is clearly preferable when biomechanic opti- ons of a polysegmented, hydroskeletal body plan are taken into account. The so called hydroskeleton hypo- thesis, rooted in the work of W. F. GUTMANN, is the most detailed anagenetic scenario which depicts an acrania-like ur-deuterostome. Moreover, it is the only morphology-based hypothesis which is in line with all of the unexpected molecular results of deuterostome evolution (i.e. pterobranchs, and tuni- cates as highly derived forms which secondarily lost the ancestral polysegmentation).

Zusammenfassung

Seit der wiederholten Bestätigung der “new animal phylogeny” (einer molekularsystematischen, von ADOUTTE et al. 1999/2000 ermittelten Großphylogenie des Tierreiches) ist klar geworden, dass innerhalb der traditionellen Großeinteilung der Bilateria in Proto- und Deuterostomia (GROBBEN 1908) einige Äınde- rungen vorgenommen werden müssen. Kennzeichnend für die Protostomia ist eine Neueinteilung in Ecdysozoa und Lophotrochozoa, kennzeichnend für die Deuterostomia eine Einteilung in Chordata und Ambulacraria – letztere wurde allerdings in sehr ähnlicher Form ebenfalls von GROBBEN (1908) postuliert. Viele Einzelresultate innerhalb dieser molekularsystematischen Großeinteilung widersprechen mor- phologischen Rekonstruktionen. Für die Rekonstruktion der Deuterostomier-Evolution hat dies zur Folge, dass nur noch von drei möglichen Szenarien ausgegangen wird, welche früher allesamt als Außenseiterpo- sitionen galten. Es sind dies ein “Ambulacraria-Szenario”, ein “Xenoturbelliden-Szenario” und ein “Chor- daten-Szenario”. Das Chordaten-Szenario ist dabei in der neueren Literatur kaum detailliert worden. Im vorliegenden Artikel wird dies mit Rückgriff auf die sogenannte Hydroskelett-Theorie getan, die auf Arbei- ten von W. F. GUTMANN basiert. Das dort ermittelte Szenario eines Acranier-artigen “Ur-Deuterostomiers” hat zwei beachtenswerte Vorteile: Erstens nimmt es sämtliche unerwarteten molekularbiologischen Einzel- resultate für die Deuterostomier vorweg (Hemichordaten, Echinodermen und Tunicaten als hochabgeleitete Formen), zweitens ist es im Laufe von über vierzig Jahren detaillierter ausgearbeitet worden als andere Modelle zur Deuterostomier-Evolution. Aus diesen Gründen ist es auch für eine Re-Interpretation fossiler Formen von Interesse (im Text exemplarisch für die Vetulicolia und frühe kambrische Chordaten demon- striert).

1) Dr. MICHAEL GUDO, Morphisto Evolutionsforschung und Anwendung GmbH, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Ger- many, e-mail: [email protected]

2) Dr. TAREQ SYED, Morphisto Evolutionsforschung und Anwendung GmbH, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Ger- many, e-mail: [email protected]

Hundred Years of Deuterostomia

1. Introduction

Since KARL GROBBEN introduced the superphylum Deuteros- tomia one hundred years ago (GROBBEN 1908), there have been intense debates about validity, members and the exact phylogenesis of this group. Today, molecular systematics and developmental genetics offer previously unavailable clues which, however, seem to conflict with almost all morphology- based interpretations of the Deuterostomia (for a review see GEE 2001, and also WINCHELL et al. 2002). The vast majority of these morphology-based reconstructions rely on compari- sons of isolated characters instead of functional character com- plexes. To resolve some of the ambiguities, the present paper aims at two goals. First, and most important, we will demon- strate that phylogenetic reconstructions accomplished by a function-focused approach called constructional morphology (German “Konstruktionsmorphologie”; SCHMIDT-KITTLER & VOGEL 1991; GUTMANN 1993; GUDO et al. 2002) are in much Fig. 1. A condensed view on the main cladogenetic and anagenetic better agreement with molecular data than results from struc- aspects of the new animal phylogeny (modified from PRUD´HOMME et ture-based, morphological analyses. Second, we will empha- al. 2003; added according to COOK et al. 2004, and size that methods which reconstruct anagenetic pathways (i.e. JIMÉNEZ-GURI et al. 2006). On the cladogenetic level, molecular syste- matics confirmed the traditional group of the Deuterostomia, however, successive morphological transformation steps during evolu- Chaetognatha (arrow worms, not shown) and (comp. tion; RENSCH 1972) should be based on independent structural- position of ) are now excluded from this taxon. Lophopho- functional approaches and not on mere character sorting – rata group within the new protostome-superphylum Lophotrochozoa. however sophisticated methodologically – as in cladistic The remaining are phyla of periodically moulting , reconstructions (pure genealogies). Such anagenetic step-by- the Ecdysozoa. On the anagenetic level, similarities in the genetic con- step reconstructions are potentially helpful to interprete fossile trol of body segmentation suggest a polysegmented and problematica (which will casually be demonstrated here with loss of this feature in all bilaterian groups except the Acoelomorpha, regard to the Vetulicolia (Deuterostomia incerta which represent an early and isolated side branch. sedis) and -). are closely related to deuterostomes nor do they represent basal 2. The “New Animal Phylogeny”: Results bilaterians (they are not even monophyletic, HALANYCH 2004, DUNN et al. 2008); (3) Annelida and Arthropoda can no longer and conflicts with traditional phylogenies be united in a taxon Articulata; (4) the bilaterian tree does not imply an overall increase of “morphological complexity”, i.e. gradual transformation lines such as acoelomate=>pseudocoe- Over the past ten years, molecular changed text- lomate=>coelomate (anagenesis of a secondary body cavity) or book views on metazoan bauplan evolution. In the "New Ani- amer=>oligomer=>metamer/polymer (anagenesis of a poly- mal Phylogeny" (NAP) introduced by ADOUTTE et al. (1999, segmented trunk; traditionally rated as parallel events in Chor- 2000), traditional major domains of the animal were data and Articulata) are not supported by the NAP (ADOUTTE rearranged, apparently well-established groups split, and com- et al. 1999). monly accepted evolutionary assumptions rejected (fig. 1). On the cladogenetic level, the bilateria were devided into three 2.1 Consequences of the new protostome phylogeny superphyla, the Deuterostomia, Ecdysozoa, and Lophotrocho- zoa; later, the Acoelomorpha were added as an early side The origin of the NAP can be traced back to the introduction of branch (COOK et al. 2004; JIMÉNEZ-GURI 2006). On the anage- the new protostome superphyla Lophotrochozoa and Ecdyso- netic level, the possibility of a polymer-segmented urbilaterian zoa in 1995 and 1997, respectively (comp. reviews in (probably growing by “terminal addition” during embryogene- ADOUTTE et al. 1999, 2000; and HALANYCH 2004). After the sis; JACOBS et al., 2005) gained increasing interest, mainly on exclusion from the Deuterostomia of the Chaetognatha, the basis of comparative studies of the Hox gene system (e.g. Pogonophora and the three lophophorate phyla (Phoronida, BALAVOINE et al. 2002; PRUD´HOMME et al. 2003; SEO et al. Brachiopoda, and ), there now are far more protostome 2004; DEROSA et al. 2005). This would imply that the last com- than deuterostome lines. GERHART (2006, p.678) recognizes 25 mon ancestor of deuterostomes, ecdysozoans and lophotrocho- protostome phyla, whereas deuterostomes consist of only 6 zoans can be envisaged as a coelomate -like animal, phyla (fig. 2b and next section). Here we refrain from explor- and that in many bilaterian lines as well as segments ing protostome radiation; molecular analyses of protostome became lost secondarily (BALAVOINE & ADOUTTE 2003). For relationships will be mentioned only if they bear on our subse- at least four reasons, this new view is in conflict with almost all quent discussion of deuterostome phylogeny. morphology-based phylogenies: (1) Platyhelminthes split in a Obviously, if the anagenetic scenario depicted in fig. 1 is quite unexpected way (Acoelomorpha very basal, all other Pla- correct, then an annelid-like body plan (gradually achieved tyhelminthes very derived; fig. 1); (2) Lophophorata neither from a common, unsegmented ancestor of acoelomorphs and

10

MICHAEL GUDO & TAREQ SYED, 13. November 2008

early , see also fig. 3) will be the key to early deutero- the Acrania and Craniota (notoneural condition). However, this stome evolution. Some supporters of the new phylogeny, argument is valid only if two currently existing body plans are though, doubt the significance of the annelid body plan (e.g. forced into a phylogenetic sequence (for example, by turning HALANYCH 2004, p.245). However, they neglect the striking annelids upside down to reach the chordate-condition), a pro- similarities in the structure and function of Hox-genes and cedure which is anti-evolutionistic and forms the root of count- other “segmentation genes” that function as developmental less misconceptions in evolutionary biology. In our reconstruc- regulators on a higher hierarchical level (see for example tion, we prefer to follow RUPPERT (2005, p.12) and explore the PRUD´HOMME et al. 2003 and DEROSA et al. 2005) without implications and consequences of the assumption that a com- offering an evolutionary explanation. Another reason for rejec- mon ancestor of Gastroneuralia and Notoneuralia was a poly- ting the hypothesis of a polysegmented urbilaterian is that this segmented animal without a highly specialized nervous scenario implies a multiple, “non-parsimonious” loss of seg- system. Also LOWE (2008: 1575) points out “that a hypotheti- mentation in several bilaterian lines (e.g. JENNER, 1999; comp. cal ancestor was not necessarily characterized by a central ner- also fig. 1). On the other hand, BALAVOINE & ADOUTTE (2003) vous system” (which of course does not exclude the possibility pointed out that many of these non-segmented phyla possess of a common ancestry of bilaterian centraliza- characters that can be interpreted as traces of a former segmen- tion, see DENES et al. 2007). Quite obviously, distinct architec- tation, and that comparative developmental genetics should be tures of the neural systems are possible at the end-points of dif- applied for further clarification (as in the case of the ferent anagenetic pathways that originate from this common widespread “terminal addition” mode of growing, JACOBS et ancestor (thus, by using HATSCHEK´S (1891) terms Gastro- al. 2005). neuralia and Notoneuralia we refer to existing groups rather A significant feature of the “polysegmented urprotosto- than their ancestors). In this case, the question of deuterostome mian” concept is that only in this case the classical anagenetic origins becomes linked to the question of the gradual evolution model of evolving from annelid-like precursors can of the notoneural condition. It can best be answered by discus- be upheld, despite the abolition of the taxon Articulata. The sing probable evolutionary advantages of a dorsal muscle con- “polysegmented urprotostomian” concept also implies the deri- centration in the line that leads to the earliest deuterostomes, vation of the Acrania and Craniota from annelid-like precur- which in turn requires sound biomechanical reconstructions of sors, an old idea which has often been critized by pointing at hypothetical ancestors (the constructional approach; see sec- the ventrally localized nervous system of annelids (gastro- tion 3). neural condition), which contrasts with the dorsal nerve tube of

Fig. 2. Two distinct but partly similar views on deuterostome cladogenesis and anagenesis. 2A. Karl GROBBEN introduced the term “Deuterosto- mia” for the subgroups Chordonia, Ambulacralia and Chaetognatha. Deuterostomia and Protostomia (not shown) originate from a common coelo- mate precursor (detail of a from GROBBEN 1908). 2B. Molecular systematics reanimated the often rejected idea of a Chordata- Ambulacraria dichotomy in the Deuterostomia. In contrast to 2.A., Chaetognatha are excluded from the Deuterostomia; instead, the monotypic Xenoturbellida is now regarded as a basal branch of the Ambulacraria. Following fig. 1A, a segmented, probably coelomate ur-deuterosto- mian is suggested. Gill slits are present in ur-deuterostomes, and are secondarily lost in the Xenoturbellida and recent echinoderms (carpoids are extinct echinoderms with gill slits). The double arrow indicates that the position of Tunicata (urochordates) and Acrania () has to be changed according to newer results. Independent of these modifications, the scheme implies a secondary loss of segmentation in , and also in xenoturbellids and echinoderms (modified from GEE 2001; Xenoturbellida added following BOURLAT et al. 2006).

11

Hundred Years of Deuterostomia

2.2 Consequences of the new deuterostome best candidates for relatively basal deuterostomes due to their phylogeny polysegmented body (chorda-myomere system). However, many developmental biologists favour an enteropneust-like Molecular systematics of the Deuterostomia unanimously sup- condition at the basis of the , arguing that the dorsoventral port the division of this superphylum into Chordata and Ambu- expression pattern of bmp and chordin genes is protostome- lacraria (fig. 2b; see HALANYCH 2004 for review). Together like in enteropneusts (e.g. GERHART 2006, LOWE 2008). If this with the exclusion of the lophophorate phyla from the deu- assumption is correct, the polysegmentation of the urbilaterian terostomes, this “new” picture somehow resembles became reduced during evolution of an enteropneust-like ur- GROBBEN´S (1908) introduction of the Deuterostomia (fig. 2a). deuterostomian, followed by a “re-polymerization”-process in However, GROBBEN´S inclusion of the Chaetognatha (arrow the line leading to the . In the alternative scenario, an worms) into the Deuterostomia is now refuted by molecular acrania-like ur-deuterostomian evolved from the polyseg- results (HALANYCH 2004; MARLÉTAZ et al. 2006, DUNN et al. mented urbilaterian, and polysegmentation vanished in the 2008). Instead, the -like bocki became a lines leading to the ambulacraria and tunicata (fig. 2b). This new member of the deuterostomes, probably as the basic would imply that the protostome-like bmp-chordin-axis of the ambulacrarian line; this rearrangement contradicts former enteropneusts is a case of evolutionary parallelism that proba- views of echinoderms as basal ambulacraria (comp. fig. 3b and bly occurred during a process of strong simplification and STACH et al. 2005; BOURLAT et al. 2006; DUNN et al. 2008, but modification. Both of these scenarios have their merits, at least also PERSEKE et al. 2007). Another surprise came with the from a developmental biologist´s point of view, and further molecular phylogeny of the , because here the studies must be awaited (see also section 5.3). For example, if appear as a highly derived line (CAMERON et al., a bmp-chordin-axis could be demonstrated in the xenoturbel- 2000) that probably originated from enteropneust-like precur- lids, with the located at the chordin side (as in cran- sors; this reverses the relationship favored by most morphol- iotes), this could weaken the view that the enteropneust condi- ogy-based phylogenies. Similarly, the division pattern along tion is ancestral in deuterostomes (obviously, this argument the Chordata-branch was rearranged (comp. fig. 2b). Instead of also depends on the systematic position of Xenoturbella, which the previously almost universally accepted Acrania/Craniota is relatively uncertain at the moment – comp. 5.1. for details). taxon, there now is support for a sister-group relationship There appears to be agreement regarding the ancestral between Tunicata and Craniota (PHILIPPE et al. 2005; BOUR- deuterostome organization in one crucial point: nearly all LAT et al. 2006; DELSUC et al. 2006; WADA et al. 2006, DUNN developmental genes so far studied in comparative analysis of et al. 2008; for a contradicting interpretation, see MALLATT & enteropneusts and acrania/craniota are not expressed in larval WINCHELL 2007). In any case, tunicates now are seen as a or juvenile stages; their activation starts when reaching the highly specialized side branch, and no longer as representa- adult condition. Thus, as GERHART (2006, p. 681) states, the tives of the ancestral chordates, due to their reduced genome ancestral is a poor candidate for ur-deuterostomian orga- size and dispersed Hox cluster (e.g. IKUTA et al. 2004; SEO et nization, compared with the ancestral adult. In consequence, al. 2004; HUGHES & FRIEDMAN 2005). The derived status of the various “neotene larva”-scenarios for deuterostome evolu- the Pterobranchia and Tunicata leaves Xenoturbellida, tion (e.g. SALVINI-PLAWEN 1998) are rejected (see also Enteropneusta, and Acrania as the only possible representa- LACALLI 2005), and anagenetic reconstructions have to focus tives of the earliest deuterostome line. In the context of the idea on stepwise biomechanical modifications of adult forms. of a polysegmented ancestor, the Acrania would appear the

Fig. 3. Functional design of the ur-deuterostomes and ur-protostomes. Here, the last common ances- tor of deuterostomes and protostomes is recon- structed as a worm-like animal with a metameric hydraulic skeleton functioning as force absorber ancestral bilaterian and force transmitter (evolving from a compact, with internal canals gelatinous bilaterian with inner canal systems). Left side: Through specific coordinations of the activity of circular and longitudinal muscles, lateral undulations could be generated which resulted in swimming movements. The cranial region of this ancestral animal was designed as a filtering device, giving rise to the branchial apparatus which is a common structure in deuterostomes (“filter coelo- mates”). Right side: The alternative design is pre- sented by creeping, benthic forms which developed a sucking for taking up particles from the substratum (“worm coelomates”). The pelagic forms developed a dorsally concentrated nervous system (innervation of muscles around the chorda dorsalis, comp. fig. 4), while in the benthic forms a filter-coelomates worm coelomates ventral concentration of nerves took place (proba- (Notoneuralia) (Gastroneuralia) bly in connection with parapodial movement).

12

MICHAEL GUDO & TAREQ SYED, 13. November 2008

3. Anagenetic reconstructions by anatomical and histological structures is described: It was an Konstruktionsmorphologie elongated worm-like animal with serially arranged coelomic cavities that served as a hydraulic skeleton (comp. fig. 3). Lat- eral undulations, one of several types of body movements pos- Anagenetic reconstructions should present evolutionary scena- sible in such a construction, were performed by muscular con- rios that show how the functional design of organismic body traction and antagonistic interaction transmitted by the fluid structures can be transformed without gaps in functionality. filling of the coelom. The coelom is one of several differentia- Plausible scenarios can be established by ruling out dysfunctio- tions of former fluid-filled canals lined with a ciliated epithe- nal intermediates, and by explaining how the proposed lium. One of these canals functioned as intestinal tract, others pathways of transformation are canalized and constrained. In functioned in the distribution of nutrients and the excretion of the quasi-engineering approach of “Konstruktionsmorpholo- metabolic products. Additional canals might have been present, gie“, the structures of living are treated as biotechni- but speculations about their number and function lies beyond cal units. This conceptualization of plausible reconstructions is the possibilities of our reconstruction. One specific longitudi- not comparable with anagenetic hypotheses established by the nal canal, located dorsally of the intestinal tract, will be of spe- mapping of characters on genealogies; it does not even require cial importance in the subsequent argumentation (shown in a cladogenetic working hypothesis. Instead, a detailed analysis fig 4). of the functional design of recent organisms is the starting Biomechanicly, the lateral, serial arrangement of hydrau- point for a “retro-engineering” evolutionary interpretation. lic cavities minimizes internal friction during body move- Here, an initial analytical dissection phase identifies and des- ments. When the body bends laterally, the fluid in these propo- cribes the structural elements and analyses their mechanical sed coelomic cavities is deformed by the muscles of one body roles and mutual interdependence. A subsequent integrative side and thereby stretches the muscles of the opposite side. The phase uses these data to create a mechanically coherent model tissues that separate the chambers of this segmented hydraulic of the organismic apparatus. It takes into account the biome- skeleton constrain the deformation of the fluid and permit chanical and material properties of the various tissues and fluid smooth movement. We will assume a state in which, similar to fillings which constitute every . Thus, organisms are living annelids, there were two types of internal walls that bor- interpreted as “hydraulic machines” in this approach. Kon- dered coelom chambers. First, there were the transverse septa struktionsmorphologie originated in a series of papers which oriented perpendicular to the long body axis, which are called aimed to reconstruct anagenesis from dissepiments. Second, septa along a plane parallel with the precursors (GUTMANN 1967a et mult.). The evolutionary modi- long body axis divided the serial body cavities into two lateral fications of hydroskeletal body plans are a central aspect in portions, thus establishing a truely bilateral biomechanic archi- invertebrate-vertebrate transformation models, and these ana- tecture without which it would be problematic to define lateral genetic models automatically affect the understanding of deu- undulation as a specific mode of motility (HERKNER 1991). terostome radiation. Such a longitudinally oriented septum is called mesenterium. It should be noted that while this hypothetical annelid-like urbila- 4. Evolutionary Scenario for Deuterostomes terian resembles modern annelids biomechanicly, there is no requirement for body tissues to be as highly differentiated as in recent annelids. Assuming that our urbilaterian originated from This section presents the basic reconstructions for the Noto- gelatinous early metazoa (fig. 3), the body can be assumed to neuralia domain, as elaborated by the approach of Konstruk- have consisted of relatively undifferentiated gelatinous tissues tionsmorphologie over the past fourty years. The hypothesis of with contractile cells and a grid of connective fibres (the latter a polysegmented hydroskeletal Urdeuterostomian, which gives being components of the extracellular matrix). The potential of rise to a chordate branch on the one hand and an ambulacrarian such “gelatinous fibrous tissues“ or, in German, “Gallertfaser- branch on the other, has been revised and detailed many times Gewebe“, for evolutionary differentiation has been discussed (e.g. GUDO & GRASSHOFF 2002). Central arguments of the elsewhere (GRASSHOFF & GUDO 2001, 2002). latest version are summarized in the following, offering a con- The fluid-filled body works as a hydrostatic skeleton clusive morphological interpretation of deuterostome molecu- (CLARK 1964), which means that forces exerted by contracting lar phylogeny. Moreover, we think that this is one of the most muscles are transmitted to antagonistic muscle groups by the detailed scenarios of deuterostome evolution. As such it is of volume-invariant deformation of fluid-filled cavities. In such a special interest for palaeontologists, because findings hydraulic softbody system performing lateral undulations, the can be interpreted with regard to the hypothetical intermediates hydraulic system transmits the muscular forces between the described in the step-by-step-reconstructions. left and right body side, which contract alternatingly. Under contraction of the longitudinal muscles alone, the body would 4.1 The Ur-Deuterostomian be shortened stepwise and increase in width, but circular mus- cles as well as contractile elements that might be present in the The first aspect we have to deal with is the body structure of dissepiments and mesenteria work against these forces the supposed deuterostome ancestor, i.e. the Ur-Deuterostome (HERKNER 1991) and so the body bends, and ultimately moves and the Ur-Bilaterian. The polysegmentation of these forms foreward. For physiological reasons it is necessary that each of was proposed by GUTMANN (1966, 1967a, 1972a,b), now gain- the hydraulic units (=segments) has its own excretory system ing support from developmental genetics (fig. 1). By the retro- such as the metanephria in existing annelids. These meta- engineering approach, the body structure of the deuterostome nephridia have their internal opening in one coelomic cavity ancestor can be outlined in more detail, i.e., the interaction of and their terminal end in the adjacent (caudal) segment (fig. 4).

13 Hundred Years of Deuterostomia

This organism moved by lateral undulations; a pelagial life made the active acquisition of food possible. Any morpho- coelome logical transformation that improved the efficiency of locomo-

proto-gills tion or reduced the amount of muscular activity required for the dynamic control of body shape during locomotion was advantegous at this comparatively unspecialized stage. In an engineering sense, the most efficient modification of this body internal canals structure would be a reduction of the mass of the circular transverse septum neural tube muscles, which only function to stabilize body length during undulating movements and enforce a more or less constant body diameter. Controling body shape by muscular action alone is energy-consuming and metabolicly costly, and it limits metanephridium the overall body size (GUTMANN 1972a; GUDO & GRASSHOFF 2002).

4.2 The Chordates

The evolutionary transformations leading to a reduction of the circular muscles have to be interpreted in the context of chorda dorsalis interactions between existing structures and of causal histoge- netics. If the body length is stabilized by circular muscle acti- vity, the tissues in the body can differentiate in specific ways. During swimming movements – performed by the lateral ben-

differentiated coelomic cavities ding of the body via longitudinal and circular muscles – tissues (dorsal parts become sclerocoels) are set under compressive and tensile stresses. Especially the tissues in the sagittal plane of the body have to absorb lateral and longitudinal forces (HERKNER 1991). The tissues react by

early acrania stage histological reorganization: the connective tissue fibres and contractile cells orientate perpendicularly to the working myoseptum forces. In interaction with the already existing fluid-filled canal myomere dorsal of the intestinal tract, force-absorbing structures developed in the sagittal plane of the body. The dorsal canal above the intestinal tract became the key structure for the evolving notoneuralian organization early craniote stage (GUDO & GRASSHOFF 2002). It provided a place for nervous fibres stimulating the longitudinal muscles on the left and right body flank. As a consequence, control and stimulation of loco- motive muscles is not disturbed by the generated mechanical forces. In a fluid-filled canal, bending forces are low and com- pressive forces are compensated by the internal liquor and the Fig. 4. Evolutionary scenario for the origin of chordates from polymer- segmented ancestors possessing a hydraulic skeleton. The sequence enveloping connective tissue. This effect is further enhanced starts with the hypothetical proto-deuterostome, an actively swimming, when the canal is closed at both ends. It represents a hydraulic filtrating organism. The evolution of the neural tube and the chorda system in the midline of the body, stabilizing body length at dorsalis are optimizations of the lateral undulating mode of swimming. least to a certain extent. As a consequence, radial muscles lose Thus, deuterostome radiation reflects different options of the noto- some of their importance as control elements of body width, neuralian and chordate organization. Due to the dorsal concentration of and can be gradually reduced. Moreover, the tissues between muscles, the coelom and excretory system (metanephridia) are rearran- the neural canal and the intestinal tract could develop additio- ged in the lineages leading to the acrania and craniota (modified from nal histological differentiations that enhanced their functiona- GUDO & GRASSHOFF 2002; see text for details). lity as a length-stabilising yet flexible structure. As mentioned before, these tissues formed a force-absorbing structure, pos- This makes sense hydromechanicly as no hydraulic fluid is lost sessing fibres orientated perpendicular to the working forces. in an uncontrolled way when muscular activity sets the fluid Finally, the resulted: a connective tissue enclosing a filling under pressure (CHAPMAN 1950; CHAPMAN 1958; QUIL- contractile system that provided length stability (HERKNER LIN 1998). 1991). The notochord can perform the function of length stabi- The front end of this polysegmented animal carries a fil- lization much better than the ancestral interaction of lateral tration apparatus; canals run from the foremost part of the gut muscles and the fluid-filled neural canal. Obviously, the to the lateral body wall so that water can flow in through the functional design which evolved by these transformations is mouth and out through lateral openings. Nutrition particles are the body structure of an early chordate (fig. 4, for more details collected and held by mucus, and transported to the pharynx see GUTMANN 1972a; GUTMANN 1997; GUDO & GRASSHOFF via a ciliated ridge (i.e. the putative endostyle, GUDO & GRAS- 2002). SHOFF 2002).

14 MICHAEL GUDO & TAREQ SYED, 13. November 2008

The histological configuration of such an early chordate served in the famous tadpole larvae. Among adults, only in the is represented by lanceolatum and other extant subgroup of the copelates which have no peribranchial acranians. Histological investigations show the notochord as a cavity, the tail persists; the copelates are an early tunicate side contractile hydraulic organ surrounded by the hydraulic sclero- branch (comp. GUDO 2004). The enigmatic Cambrian Vetuli- coels, which allow free gliding of the notochord in the muscle colia fossils (SHU et al. 2001) probably represent intermediates packages during lateral undulation (GUTMANN 1971; BONIK & between swimming chordates with enlarged peribranchial cav- GUTMANN 1978). With respect to the body cross-section, the ity and ascidia-like tunicate forms (comp. the predicted proto- notochord is positioned somewhat dorsal of the midpoint. This tunicate in fig. 5 and fig. 8). configuration leads to particular biomechanical problems for As an interim summary, we conclude that our postulated lateral undulations. Engineering considerations show: if (1) ancestral deuterostome gave rise to three major evolutionary muscle packages would be oriented in a way that the generated lineages: the acranians, the craniotes, and the tunicates. The forces work exactly parallel to the body axis, and (2) the length ancestral deuterostome was a swimming, filter-feeding chor- stabilizing, force absorbing structure would not be in the date construction. This mode of life led to the craniotes on one middle of the body diameter, then the horizontal undulation of hand and, as an alternative specialization, to the peribranchial- the body would include a slight dorso-ventral bending, causing chordates which divided early into the acranians and the tuni- inefficient locomotion. But in existing animals, muscle fibres cates, on the other (fig. 5). are arranged in a specific manner, viz. in a long elongated spi- ral that extends from the front to the hind end and the 4.3 Ambulacrarians notochord in its center. This orientation of muscle fibres is attained by a reorganisation of the dissepiments (which later The ambulacrarians (hemichordates plus echinoderms; will evolve into myosepta) which connect the several portions METSCHNIKOFF 1881) are commonly seen as primitive orga- of longitudinal muscles coherently with each other into the nisms and therefore assumed to be basal in evolutionary well known zig-zag pattern of recent chordates (BONIK & GUT- history. However, not alone the NAP implicates a different MANN 1978). However, an alternative solution is also possible: interpretation, but also biomechanical considerations make it an enlargement of the dorsal muscle packages, which results in plausible that ambulacrarians are highly derived animals. a midline position of the chorda over the entire body length and Starting again with the early chordate defined above, the allows the perpendicular orientation of the myosepta. This evo- following scenario can be reconstructed. In the ancestral chor- lutionary solution is shown by some fossil early chordates, date, the coelomic cavities of the metameric ancestor had been such as Haikouella lanceolatum or , found in early cam- preserved as sclerocoels around the notochord, facilitating brian sediments (BRIGGS & KEAR 1994; CHEN et al. 1995; practically friction-free gliding of the notochord past the lateral CHEN & LI 2000; MALLATT & CHEN 2003; SHU et al. 1999, muscle groups when the body undulated. This organism had a 2003). It can be interpreted as an ancestral functional design in peribranchial chamber, enabling a hemisessile life-style burro- the evolutionary field of chordates; however, these organisms wed in the sediment, as in recent acranians. Modern represent side branches. burrow by wriggling; they ‘hammer’ themselves into the sedi- The transverse septa can be reduced in the region of the ment by notochord-contractions, supported by intense lateral coelomic cavities when length stabilisation is achieved by the undulations of the trunk. However, this type of motility is ener- notochord, so that the coelomic fluid does no longer function getically costly, and is only applied for short, fast movements as part of a hydraulic skeleton for lateral movements. Conse- into sandy sediments. For a more persistent burrowing in softer quently, the tissue mass – which always comes at material and sediments, peristaltic body deformation would effectively sup- energetic costs for production and maintenance – is reduced. port the wriggeling movements. However, such quasi-peristal- The result is one large body coelom, containing the intestinal tic movements can be perfomed only by the front end of the tract and the internal organs. This fluid-filled cavity still func- ancestral chordate, when the longitudinal muscle fibres in the tions as a hydraulic skeleton for the dorsoventral bending oral region attain a plywood-like crisscross orientation, and driven by the epaxial and hypaxial musculature. From this when the sclerocoels around the notochord enlarge. During chordate animal, further improvements of lateral undulation these transformations, the cranial end of the chordate was open up the pathway to the craniotes (GUTMANN 1967b; GUT- transformed into an organ which allowed burrowing in fine MANN 1972a; GUTMANN 1972b). Another anagenetic pathway sediment by peristaltic movements. Finally, when the peristal- originating from the simple chordate construction defined tic organ differentiated into a proboscis and a collar, the wrig- above leads to the recent acranians which preserved features of geling movements of the hindpart of the body became redun- this ancestral structure, due to some physiological constraints. dant. As a consequence, the notochord and the massive longitu- As discussed by SCHMITZ et al. (2000), respiration through the dinal muscles could be reduced in caudo-cranial direction. The branchial gut contributes only up to 10 percent to the overall original peribranchial chamber behind the peristaltic organ respiratory activity of small acranians, while the bulk of the (that is, caudal of the collar), was dorsally opened, enforcing gas exchange takes place in the tissues of the peribranchial nerve fibres to rearrange in the way known from recent entero- chamber, over the entire body surface, and at the surfaces of pneusts. The gonads maintained their place in the “wings“ of the coelomic cavities. This explains why acranians have to pre- the peribranchial chamber. The result of this transformation serve their locomotory apparatus although they are hemisessile was an ancestral enteropneust-like organism (GUTMANN & organisms dwelling in sediments. The tunicates, on the other BONIK 1979). hand, represent an alternative: they enlarged their peribranchial This organism possessed an organisation of its coelomic cavity and perform respiration across its surface alone. As a cavities which became important not only for the functioning consequence, they were able to reduce their muscular tail, pre- of the enteropneust construction, but also for subsequent evo-

15 Hundred Years of Deuterostomia

ancestral chordate metameric ancestor

Tunicata (vetulicolia stage)

Craniota

Acrania

Fig. 5. Anagenetic relations of the chordate branch of the deuterostomes. According to biomechanical considerations, chordates appear basal, while tunicates (= urochordates) are derived from acrania-like intermediates. Note that the branching order of the Tunicata, Acrania and Craniota still remains unresolved in molecular phylogenies (comp. fig. 2b). lutionary transformations. A pair of trunk extended plete descriptions of the relatively straight-forward derivation along the mesenterium into the collar region. The burrowing of body-plans from enteropneust-like construc- enteropneust moves by peristaltic creeping, anchors its collar tions, see GUDO (2005) and GUDO & DETTMANN (2005). in the sediment and contracts the longitudinal muscles of the With this biomechanics-based evolutionary scenario, the trunk pulling it behind. In this way, the pressure in the trunk evolutionary history of the deuterostomes is complete. The coelom including its protrusions into the collar rises. The resul- ancestral deuterostome-construction offered the biomechanical ting stiffening of the collar supports its anchoring in the walls option to develop a peristaltic organ (consisting of proboscis of the burrowed tube (fig. 6). and collar) by simple morphological transformations. When The reconstruction of the next evolutionary steps star- these structures were fully developed, the typical chordate fea- ting from the enteropneust organization is straight-forward tures could be reduced and the body structure of an enterop- (comp. fig. 7). Extensions of the collar became tentacle-like neust evolved. Thus, pterobranchs and echinoderms are highly structures as found in recent pterobranchs (GUTMANN 1972a, derived hemichordates. However, it remains unclear at this BONIK et al. 1978, GUTMANN & BONIK 1979). The transition stage whether pterobranchs and echinoderms are widely sepa- to echinoderms occurred in a separate lineage in which not the rated (i.e. independently from enteropneust-like predecessors) gut and its terminal openings were shifted in the mesentery – as or whether they evolved from an ancestor with a body structure it happened in the pterobranchs – but in which the gut together quite similar to pterobranchs. with the mesentery became bent into a U-shaped structure. In this way the trunk coelom was enlarged, forming a hydraulic 5. Discussion capsule which could be pressurized continuously by muscular activity. Additional loops of gut and mesentery developed, pro- viding internal tethering structures. These tethering structures If the molecular reconstruction of deuterostome phylogeny as controlled the patterned bulging of the body wall when the shown in fig. 2b is accepted, then the anagenetic scenario of fluid filling was set under pressure. Due to the bending of the the hydroskeleton hypothesis, published in a comprehensive gut and to basic physical principles acting when hydraulic form as early as 1966 by W. F. GUTMANN, will be of high systems come into close contact, the trunk formed five bulges interest as it sheds light on the causes for the contradictions forcing the body into a overall pentaradial organisation. These between phylogenies based on structural characters as opposed bulges enlarged more and more and provided mechanical sup- to molecular ones. Provided that the cladogenetic and anagene- port for the tentacles that developed from the collar. Various tic implications of the NAP are correct, it appears that approa- complex transformations of the geometry of the coelom and ches based on morphological structures suffer from an inability the nervous system as well as histological transformations to identify secondary simplification events (JENNER, 2004). In occurred which we will not discuss in detail; for more com- our constructional morphology approach, this is not the case.

16 MICHAEL GUDO & TAREQ SYED, 13. November 2008

zing that on the basis of recent molecular findings, the lopho- phorate phyla do not seem closely related to the Deuterosto- mia. The taxon “Epineuralia” consisting of Lophophorata and Deuterostomia, which formed the basis of the – now fully refu- ted – cladogenetic and anagenetic proposals of V. SALVINI- PLAWEN (1998) and NIELSEN (2001), appears today to be arti- ficial. Lophophorates are highly derived protostomia, accor- ding to the hydroskeleton hypothesis; this probably is one of the most specific similarities between the hypothesis and the NAP, as noted by BALAVOINE & ADOUTTE (2003, p.142) with regard to the derivation model of GUTMANN et al. (1978). Furthermore, the hydroskeleton hypothesis interpretes the pelagic Copelata as an early branch within the Tunicata (mentioned in section 4.2), which is also supported by molecu- lar data (MALLATT & WINCHELL 2007). Thus, it now appears that a very first “total evidence model” is possible, i.e. a com- plete integration of molecular results and independently elabo- rated morphological reconstructions (SYED 2003; SYED et al. 2007). Concerning early deuterostome radiation, it has been stated that three competing models have to be discussed: an ambulacrarian model, a chordate model, and a xenoturbellid- model (SWALLA & SMITH 2008: 1565). It is quite surprising that the chordate model is completely ignored in the newer lite- rature, and that the scenario of the hydroskeleton-hypothesis is still the only detailed proposal here. Nevertheless, several pro- blematic aspects of the chordate model remain to be clarified, as discussed below.

5.1 The unresolved position of Xenoturbella bocki

The possible deuterostome relationship of xenoturbellids is a feature of current molecular phylogenies which has not been subjected so far to a rigorous retro-engineering analysis in the context of the hydroskeleton hypothesis. If Xenoturbellida are an early side branch of Ambulacraria as suggested by fig. 2b, then an enteropneust-like precursor would be the most obvious starting point for an anagenetic interpretation. We do not attempt to detail such a model here, because the notion of Xenoturbella as a basic ambulacrarian line (BOURLAT et al. 2006) has recently been challenged by PERSEKE et al. (2007), according to whom xenoturbellids are closest relatives of all other deuterostomes, or in some analyses even a sister group of the Protostomia + Deuterostomia-clade. However, the latest results from molecular systematics, including an analysis of their Hox-repertoire, support the inclusion of Xenoturbellida into Deuterostomia, and their branching as basal Ambulacraria (FRITZSCH et al. 2007, DUNN et al. 2008). These results imply Fig. 6. Evolutionary transformation from chordates to ambulacrarians that Xenoturbella has to be interpreted as a secondarily simpli- (modified from GUTMANN 1989; see text for details). fied animal, which lost coelomic cavities and trimeric segmen- tation from a -like stage. In support of this idea, it Decades ago, “Konstruktionsmorphologie” has interpreted has to be stressed that according to the NAP the vast majority tunicates, hemichordates, and echinoderms as highly derived of flatworm-like body plans has to be interpreted as “coeloma- forms featuring secondary losses of typical chordate charac- tes without a coelom” (BALAVOINE, 1998), i.e. as highly ters, which nicely fits the molecular results shown in fig. 1 and derived side branches, independent of their exact branching fig. 2b. Moreover, the exclusion of the lophophorate phyla, the position (comp. position of the platyhelminthes in fig. 1). Chaetognatha, and the Pogonophora from the Deuterostomia is in full agreement with the hydroskeleton hypothesis (GUT- 5.2 Echinoderms: Descendants of pterobranchs or MANN 1966 included the Pogonophora into the Deuterostomia, of enteropneusts? but corrected this in 1972 by describing them as derived ann- elids. The latter is now confirmed by molecular data, see The hydroskeleton hypothesis has been challenged on the HALANYCH 2004, p.239 f.). In particular, it is worth emphasi- grounds that the NAP does not support a Pterobranchia + Echi-

17 Hundred Years of Deuterostomia

ancestral enteropneust

pterobranch-like intermediate

Echinodermata

Enteropneusta

Pterobranchia

Fig. 7. Anagenetic relations of the ambulacrarians. According to the presented scenario (fig. 5), the functional design of enteropneusts can be derived from an ancestral chordate. From such a body structure, the recent enteropneusts, pterobranchs, and echinoderms developed as indepen- dent lineages. This does not necessarily imply that Echinodermata are the sister-group of the Pterobranchia, but rather that echinoderms have to be derived from ancestors that had a functional design similar to pterobranchs. nodermata-clade (WINCHELL et al. 2002, p.774). This argu- mon is that the tentacles of pterobranchs and echinoderms arise ment is not sound since the anagenetic model of echinoderm from extensions of the enteropneust collar (see also fig. 6). In evolution as given by GUTMANN (1972a) and, in more detail, general, the collar region of recent enteropneusts shows consi- by GUDO (2005), does not necessarily imply a sister group derable variability as demonstrated by the bizarre, enlarged relationship between Pterobranchia and Echinodermata. As collars of the former “Lophenteropneusts”, deep sea enterop- GUTMANN (1981, p.74) explained: neusts described by HOLLAND et al. (2005). Taken together, the reconstruction of the ambulacraria-domain does not imply one “Because the adult morphology of echinoderms is so pro- single cladogenetic tree, but rather an anagenetic scenario in foundly modified from that of typical acrania-like ancestors, it which echinoderms and pterobranchs are more derived than is difficult to suggest a reasonable transformation series and to enteropneusts. It cannot be overstressed that this long-time link possible intermediate stages with known groups. Most minority opinion is now fully supported by molecular phyloge- evidence suggests a very close link between echinoderms and netics. hemichordates so that I will assume that the pterobranchs or at least the enteropneusts represent the chordate construction from which echinoderms evolved.” 5.3 The basic deuterostome: pelagic or benthic mode of life?

In other words, an independent evolution of ptero- The swimming capacity of acranians now is widely accepted as branchs and echinoderms from an enteropneust-like ancestor is a plesiomorphic character of the Chordata (since Tunicata are not excluded (in fact, this possibility was explicitly demonstra- no longer regarded as ancestral forms), and this raises the que- ted by BONIK et al. 1978). In this scenario, which fits the stion whether early deuterostomes were capable of active results of the NAP, the tentacles of pterobranchs and echin- swimming, too. The idea usually is rejected by authors who oderms evolved independently. Our figs. 7 and 8 show both favour an enteropneust-like predecessor, and thus a fully possibilities: A close relationship of echinoderms and ptero- benthic mode of life for the ur-deuterostomia (e.g. LACALLI branchs in fig. 7fig. 1, and a probably independent evolution of 2005). As mentioned in section 2.2, developmental biologists these lines in fig. 8. What both reconstructions have in com- tend to support this notion because the localization of the ente-

18 MICHAEL GUDO & TAREQ SYED, 13. November 2008

Fishes metameric hydraulic system

head, jaws, scale-belts

Conodonts

pharyngeal- rostral filter system elements

Agnatha head notochord/somite system capsule

Acranians mouth tentacles

Tunicates branchial basket

Enteropneusts proboscis: burrowing Fig. 8. Combined evolutionary sce- nario (= anagenetic relations) of the deuterostomes. Biomechanical consi- derations strongly suggest that within tentacles the deuterostomes, two major linea- ges diverged very early: the lineage of Pterobranchia the ambulacraria (secondarily benthic forms) and the lineage of the chordata (primarily pelagic; the tunicates secondarily became benthic with the possible exception of the pelagic tuni- skeletal elements cate subgroup of the Copelata [syn. in the skin /Appendicularia]). For Echinoderms details, see text.

ropneust mouth at the chordin-side is protostome-like and thus plausible within the phylogenetic context of the NAP, especi- indicates that enteropneust are links between proto- and deute- ally with respect to the systematic position of the Chaetognatha rostomes (NÜBLER-JUNG & ARENDT 1999; GERHART 2006). (VARGAS & ABOITIZ 2005). As mentioned above, Chaetogna- However, newer evo/devo-studies realize that the enterop- tha appear unrelated to the deuterostomes in molecular phylo- neusts may represent a highly modificated deuterostome condi- genies, and group as an isolated protostome branch ancestral to tion. DENES et al. (2007, p. 285) offer an interpretation which the Ecdysozoa + Lophotrochozoa-clade. Therefore, VARGAS & perfectly fits the scenario of the hydroskeleton hypothesis ABOITIZ (2005) conclude that ancestral protostomes might well (compare fig. 6 & 7): have been pelagic organisms (as chaetognaths typically are), and that this also holds true for the ancestral deuterostomes “One possible explanation is that the enteropneust trunk has (even more so as Chaetognatha are “protostomes with deutero- lost part of its neuroarchitecture due to an evolutionary stome-like development”, MARLÉTAZ et al. 2006). Moreover, change in locomotion. While annelids and propel BOURLAT et al. (2006: 88) emphasize that the nearest proto- themselves through trunk musculature (and associated trunk stome-like relatives of the deuterostomes possess a centralized CNS), the enteropneust body is mainly drawn forward by nervous system rather than diffuse nerve nets, so that the for- means of the contraction of the longitudinal muscles in their anterior proboscis and collar (…). Possibly, enteropneusts mer is more likely to represent the condition of basal deutero- have partially reduced their locomotor trunk musculature con- stomes (comp. also DENES et al. 2007). Although both the comitant with motor parts of the CNS (while the peripheral swimming capacity and a centralized nervous system are in sensory neurons prevailed in “diffuse” arrangement).” agreement with the anagenetic scenario shown in fig. 4, we feel that this argumentation is problematic. For example, VARGAS This justifies the assumption of swimming organisms as & ABOITIZ (2005) do not discuss evidence provided by COOK protostome-deuterostome intermediates, as more as this seems et al. (2004) that Acoelomorpha represent the most basal bila-

19 Hundred Years of Deuterostomia

terian line. Defenders of the “benthic deuterostome ancestor”- ble derivation of the Xenoturbella body-plan from a clam-like hypothesis could interpret the epibenthic lifestyle and the organization forms a strong argument against the validity of basoepithelial nerve net of acoelomorphs as an ancestral condi- the molecular analyses that motivated the inclusion of Xenotur- tion, and this could also be claimed for the same features in bella in the molluscs. Evolution does not stand for a “mor- xenoturbellids (given that they group outside the Deuterosto- phing” of character patterns. Therefore we are skeptical when mia, as supposed by PERSEKE et al., 2007). This case exempli- for example GERHART (2006) presents a character-based body fies why instead of parsimony arguments, we prefer detailed inversion scenario leading from enteropneusts (turned upside anagenetic models to reconstruct the morphological organiza- down) to chordates. GERHART himself admits on p. 682 that tion and habitat of the urdeuterostomia. According to our argu- “this is, of course, a speculative >morphing< exercise”. In con- mentation in section 4.2, flatworm-like creeping forms or neo- trast, anagenetic reconstructions that are based on analyses of tenic larva of such benthic organisms can be ruled out as direct the biomechanics and physiological functioning of the orga- chordate ancestors. For example, it is entirely unclear how a nisms in question, are open to criticism of their physical plausi- well-regulated muscle/myosept-system could evolve gradually bility, and – speculative as they may be – can never be rated as in such forms. GUTMANN (1988, p.265) demonstrated this for mere “morphing exercises” (the latter being a purely statistical the tail of the tunicate larva: These larvae have been claimed to approach). We agree with BOCK (2000) who rated process-ori- represent chordate ancestors, although no explanation or model ented approaches as “nomological deductive explanations”; has ever been offered for a gradual evolution of myosepta in such explanations can always be critically evaluated in terms those organisms. This is also the case in the larva-hypothesis of causations and effects, because they deal with transformati- given by SALVINI-PLAWEN (1998, p.138): In his fig. 21, the ons of functional organisms, not with patterns of descriptive longitudinal muscles suddenly develop into a serial pattern, but characters. no indication of the causes and constructional consequences of In the case of the deuterostomes, detailed anagenetic this evolutionary step is provided. The hydroskeleton model reconstructions suggest that all phylogenetic trees are highly does not suffer from such shortcomings, as here the myosepta questionable which, for example, shift echinoderms to an ance- can be derived from the transverse septa of an annelid-like stral position, or which combine echinoderms or hemichorda- adult form without unexplained sudden ocurrences of novel tes with tunicates (known as the pharyngopneust-hypothesis). structures in the course of the anagenetic development. Similarly, assumptions of a xenoturbellid-like or an oligomeric (trimeric) ur-deuterostomian have to be rejected: The mechani- 5.4 Final Conclusions cal conditions for the development of a notochord and an efficient locomotory apparatus as known from recent acranians Anagenetic hypotheses are always present in phylogenetic and craniotes, are not given in any of these body structures. On trees but usually not revealed in full detail, especially in purely the other hand, trees are plausible that place echinoderms and cladistic approaches. Following the integration of molecular hemichordates together as Ambulacraria, as the sister group of data and results from the “Konstruktionsmorphologie”- the Chordata. Highly convincing are those phylograms which approach as given above for the deuterostome phyla, one can suggest a polysegmented ancestor for the deuterostomes (as for outline a simple, two-step method to evaluate “naked” clado- example fig. 1), because only in a polysegmented system the grams (i.e. pure genealogical schemes). The first step is to biomechanical conditions for the development of a notochord derive a scenario from the tree considered; the second step is to are present. compare this scenario with anagenetic models that are based on What does this imply regarding the Deuterostomia-phy- quasi-engineering investigations and reconstructions of the logenies (as shown in fig. 2b) of the NAP? Even though there functional designs of the evolutionary stages postulated. In still is some ambiguity in the cladogenetic model, the overall turn, molecular investigations are extremely helpful to deter- anagenetic implications appear quite plausible from a construc- mine starting points of anagenetic models, especially for tional morphologist´s point of view, especially when results highly modified or miniaturized forms. Above, we have men- from molecular systematics and developmental genetics are tioned xenoturbellids, echinoderms and the tunicate subgroup combined, as shown in fig. 1. In other words, the Deuterosto- of the copelates as examples how molecular genealogies sup- mia-phylogenies elaborated by newer molecular approaches port the determination of phylogenetic precursor stages. Howe- can be rated as being in the realm of possibility. If so, ver, secondary reductions and modifications also occur on the GROBBEN’S (1908) structure-based phylogeny, deriving deu- genetic level and are difficult to handle by molecular systema- terostomes from coelomates and deviding them into Ambulac- tics (which actually is a problem in the Tunicata, compare raria and Chordata implies one of the most favourable anage- MALLATT & WINCHELL 2007, p.1012). Waiting for robust netic models – however, a lot of details of this scenario still molecular phylogenies may require considerable patience in await plausible reconstructions. some cases, but it is wiser than accepting molecular trees too early, as totally artificial results are always possible. A warning 6. Acknowledgements example is the previous molecular-based classification of Xenoturbella as a mollusk, more specifically a nuculid clam (literature in PERSEKE et al. 2007). This finding immediately We are indebted to our colleagues and students at the Sencken- led some authors to suggest that body plan plasticity is nearly berg Institute for discussions of the topic. Special thanks to Dr. incalculable (e.g. LEROI 2000). This view ignores biomechani- MANFRED GRASSHOFF, who read the manuscript several times cal constraints and physiological limitations that canalize mor- and helped considerably to develop the argumentation presen- phological transformations. Contrarily, in the context of the ted, and to Dr. WINFRIED S. PETERS for improving the manus- “Konstruktionsmorphologie”-approach, the lack of any plausi- cript linguisticly.

20 MICHAEL GUDO & TAREQ SYED, 13. November 2008

7. Literature FRITZSCH, G., BÖHME, M.U., THORNDYKE, M., NAKANO, H., ISRAELS- SON, O., STACH, T., SCHLEGEL, M., HANKELN, T. & STADLER, P. F. (2007): PCR survey of Xenoturbella bocki Hox genes. J. Exp. ADOUTTE, A., BALAVOINE, G., LARTILLOT, N. & DE ROSA, R. (1999): Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 310B: 278-284. The end of intermediate taxa? Trends in Genetics 15: 104-108. GERHART, J. (2006): The deuterostome ancestor. Journal of Cellular ADOUTTE, A., BALAVOINE, G., LARTILLOT, N., LESPINET, O., Physiology 209: 677-685. PRUD´HOMME, B. & DE ROSA, R. (2000): The new animal phylog- GEE, H. (2001): Deuterostome phylogeny: the context for the origin eny: Reliability and implications. Proceedings of the National and evolution of the vertebrates. In: AHLBERG P.E. (ed.): Major Academy of Science, USA 97: 4453-4456. events in early vertebrate evolution. Taylor & Francis, London, BALAVOINE, G. (1998): Are Platyhelminthes coelomates without a New York: 1-14. coelom? An argument based on the evolution of Hox genes. Amer. GRASSHOFF, M. & GUDO, M. (2001): The evolution of animals – Zool. 38: 843-858. poster with explanations. Frankfurt am Main. BALAVOINE, G., DE ROSA, R. & ADOUTTE, A. (2002): Hox clusters and GRASSHOFF, M. & GUDO, M. (2002): The Origin of Metazoa and the bilaterian phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 24: Main Evolutionary Lineages of the Animal Kingdom – The Galler- 366-373. toid Hypothesis in the Light of Modern Research . Senckenber- BALAVOINE, G. & ADOUTTE, A. (2003): The segmented Urbilateria: A giana lethaea 82: 295-314. testable scenario. Integrative and Comparative Biology 43: 137- GROBBEN, K. (1908): Die systematische Einteilung des Tierreiches. 147. Verhandlungen der kaiserlich-königlichen zoologisch-botanischen BOCK, W. J. (2000): Explanations in a historical science. In: D. S. Gesellschaft in Wien 58: 491-511. PETERS & M. WEINGARTEN (eds.): Organisms, Genes and Evolu- GUDO, M. (2004): Der Generationswechsel der Tunikaten: Ein evolu- tion - Evolutionary Theory at the Crosscroads. Proceedings of the tionsbiologisches Erklärungsmodell. Senckenbergiana biologica 7th International Senckenberg Conference. Steiner, Stuttgart: 33- 84: 97-117. 42. GUDO, M. (2005): An Evolutionary Scenario for the Origin of Pentam- BONIK, K. & GUTMANN, W. F. (1978): Die Biotechnik der Doppel- eric Echinoderms – Implications from the Hydraulic Principles of Hydraulik (Chorda-Sklerocoelen-Myomeren-System) bei den form Determination. Acta Biotheoretica 53: 191-216. Acraniern. Senckenbergiana biologica 58: 275-286. GUDO, M. & DETTMANN, F. (2005): Evolutionsmodelle für die Entste- BONIK, K., GUTMANN, W. F. & HAUDE, R. (1978): Stachelhäuter mit hung der Echinodermen. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 79: 305-338. Kiemen-Apparat: Der Beleg für die Ableitung der Echinodermen GUDO, M. & GRASSHOFF, M. (2002): The Origin and Early Evolution von Chordatieren. Natur und Museum 108: 211-214. of Chordates: The ‘Hydroskelett-Theorie’ and New Insights BOURLAT, S. J., JULIUSDOTTIR, T., LOWE, C. J., FREEMAN, R., ARONO- Towards a Metameric Ancestor. Senckenbergiana lethaea 82: 325- WICZ, J., KIRSCHNER, M., LANDER, E. S., THORNDYKE, M., 346. NAKANO, H., KOHN, A. B., HEYLAND, A., MOROZ, L. L., COPLEY, GUDO, M., GUTMANN, M. & SCHOLZ, J. (2002): Concepts of Func- R. R. & TELFORD, M. J. (2006): Deuterostome phylogeny reveals tional, Engineering and Constructional Morphology: Introductory monophyletic chordates and the new phylum Xenoturbellida. Remarks. Senckenbergiana lethaea 82: 7-10. Nature 444: 85-88. GUTMANN, W. F. (1966): Coelomgliederung, Myomerie und die Frage BRIGGS, D. E. G. & KEAR, A. J. (1994): Decay of Branchiostoma: der Vertebraten-Antezedenten. Zeitschrift für zoologische Systema- implications for soft-tissue preservation in and other tik und Evolutionsforschung 4: 13-57. primitive chordates. Lethaia 26: 275-287. GUTMANN, W. F. (1967a): Die Entstehung des Coeloms und seine phy- CAMERON, C. B., GAREY, J. R. & SWALLA, B. J. (2000): Evolution of logenetische Abwandlung im Deuterostomier-Stamm. Zoolo- the chordate body plan: new insights from phylogenetic analyses of gischer Anzeiger 179: 109-131. deuterostome phyla. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- GUTMANN, W. F. (1967b): Das Dermalskelett der fossilen "Pan- ence, USA 97: 4469-4474. zerfische" funktionell und phylogenetisch interpretiert. Sencken- CHAPMAN, G. (1950): Of the movements of worms. Journal of Experi- bergiana lethaea 48: 277-283. mental Biology 27: 29-39. GUTMANN, W. F. (1971): Zu Bau und Leistung von Tierkonstruktionen CHAPMAN, G. (1958): The hydrostatic skeleton in the . 14. Was ist urtümlich an Branchiostoma? Natur und Museum 101: Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 33: 340-356. 338-360. GUTMANN, W. F. (1972a): Die Hydroskelett-Theorie. Aufsätze und CHEN, J. Y., DZIK, J., EDGECOMBE, G. D., RAMSKÖLD, L. & ZHOU, G. Reden der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 21: Q. (1995): A possible Early Cambrian chordate. Nature 377: 720- 1-91. 721. GUTMANN, W. F. (1972b): Vom Hydroskelett zum Skelettmuskelsys- CHEN, J. Y. & LI, C. W. (2000): Distant ancestor of mankind tem. Eine biotechnisch begründete Evolutions-Studie. Mitteilungen unearthed: 520 million -old -like fossils reveal early history des Institutes für leichte Flächentragwerke der Universität Stuttgart of vertebrates. Scientific Progress 83: 123-133. (IL) 4: 16-38. CLARK, R. B. (1964): Dynamics in the metazoan evolution. The origin GUTMANN, W. F. (1981): Relationships between invertebrate phyla of the coelom and segments. Clarendon, Oxford. based on functional-mechanical analysis of the hydrostatic skele- COOK C. E., JIMENEZ E., AKAM M. & E. SALO (2004): The Hox gene ton. American Zoologist 21: 63-81. complement of acoel , a basal bilaterian clade. Evolution GUTMANN, W. F. (1988): The hydraulic principle. American Zoologist and Development 6: 154-163. 28: 257-266. DELSUC, F., BRINKMANN, H., CHOURROUT, D. & PHILIPPE, H. (2006): GUTMANN, W. F. (1989): Die Evolution hydraulischer Konstruktionen Tunicates and not cephalochordates are the closest living relatives – organismische Wandlung statt altdarwinistischer Anpassung. of vertebrates. Nature 439 (7079): 965-968. Kramer, Frankfurt am Main. DENES, A.S., JÉKELY, G., STEINMETZ, P.R.H., RAIBLE, F., SNYMAN, GUTMANN, W. F. (1993): Organismic machines – The hydraulic prin- H., PRUD´HOMME, B., FERRIER, D.E.K., BALAVOINE, G. & ciple and the evolution of living constructions. In: K. KULL & T. ARENDT, D. (2007): Molecular architecture of annelid nerve cord TIIVEL (eds.): Lectures in theoretical biology – The Second Stage, supports common origin of nervous system centralization in Bilate- Estonian Academy of Sciences, Tallinn: 171-188 ria. Cell 129: 277-288 GUTMANN, W. F. (1997): Chordaten-Konstruktionen und ihre Evolu- DEROSA, R., PRUD´HOMME, B. & BALAVOINE, G. (2005): caudal and tion. Von der Kiemenreuse zur zahnbesetzten Kieferapparatur: 363- even-skipped in the annelid and the ancestry 389. In: W. K. ALT & J. C. TÜRP (eds.): Die Evolution der Zähne – of posterior growth. Evolution and Development 7: 574-587. Phylogenie, Ontogenie, Variation, Quintessenzverlag, Berlin. DUNN, C. W., HEJNOL, A., MATUS, D. Q., PANG, K., BROWNE, W. E., GUTMANN, W. F. & BONIK, K. (1979): Detaillierung des Acranier- und SMITH, S. A., SEAVER, E., ROUSE, G. W., OBST, M., EDGECOMBE, Enteropneusten-Modells. Senckenbergiana biologica 59: 325-363. G. D., SORENSEN, M. V., HADDOCK, S. H. D., SCHMIDT-RHAESA, GUTMANN, W. F., VOGEL, K. P. & ZORN, H. (1978): Brachiopods: A., OKUSU, A., KRISTENSEN, R. M., WHEELER, W. C., MARTIN- Biomechanical Interdependences Governing Their Origin and Phy- DALE, M. Q. & GIRIBET, G. (2008): Broad phylogenomic sampling logeny. Science 199: 890-893. improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452: 745-749.

21 HALANYCH, K. M. (2004): The new view of animal phylogeny. Annual PRUD´HOMME B., DE ROSA R., ARENDT D., JULIEN J. F., PAJAZITI R., review of ecology, evolution and systematics 35: 229-256. DORRESTEIJN A.W.C., ADOUTTE A., WITTBRODT J. & BALAVOINE, HATSCHEK, B. (1891): Lehrbuch der Zoologie. Third edition, Gustav G. (2003): -like expression patterns of engrailed and Fischer Verlag Jena. wingless in the annelid Platynereis dumerilii suggest a role in seg- HERKNER, B. (1991): Neue Betrachtungen zur Chordatenevolution. ment formation. Current Biology 13: 1876-1881. Natur und Museum 121: 193-203. QUILLIN, K. J. (1998): Ontogenetic scaling of hydrostatic skeletons: HOLLAND, N. D., CLAGUE, D. A., GORDON, D. P., GEBRUK, A., PAW- geometric, static stress and dynamic stress scaling of the earth- SON, D. L. & VECCHIONE, M. (2005): “Lophenteropneust” hypoth- worm Lumbricus terrestris. The Journal of Experimental Biology esis refuted by collection and photos of new deep sea 201: 1871-1883. hemichordates. Nature 434: 374-376. RENSCH, B. (1972): Neuere Probleme der Abstammungslehre. Verlag HUGHES, A.L. & FRIEDMAN, R. (2005): Loss of ancestral genes in the F. Enke, Stuttgart. genomic evolution of intestinalis. Evolution and Devolop- RUPPERT, E.E. (2005): Key characters uniting hemichordates and chor- ment 7: 196-200. dates: homologies or homoplasies? Canadian Journal 83: IKUTA T., YOSHIDA N., SATOH N. & SAIGA, H. (2004): Ciona intesti- 8-23. nalis Hox gene cluster: Its dispersed structure and residual colinear SALVINI-PLAWEN, L. V. (1998): The urochordate larva and archichor- expression in development. Proceedings of the National Academy date organization: chordate origin and anagenesis revisited. Journal of Science 101: 15118-15123. of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 36: 129-145. JACOBS D. K., HUGHES N. C., FITZ-GIBBON S. T. & WINCHELL, C. J. SCHMIDT-KITTLER, N. & VOGEL, K. P. (1991): Constructional Mor- (2005): Terminal addition, the cambrian radiation and the phanero- phology and Evolution. Springer. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, zoic evolution of bilaterian form. Evolution and Development 7: Tokyo. 498-514. SCHMITZ, A., GEMMEL, M. & PERRY, S. F. (2000): Morphometric par- JENNER, R. M. (1999): Metazoan phylogeny as a tool in evolutionary titioning of respiratory surfaces in Amphioxus (Branchiostoma lan- biology: Current problems and discrepancies in application. Bel- ceolatum Pallas). The Journal of Experimental Biology 203: 3381- gian Journal of Zoology 129: 245-262. 3390. JENNER, R. M. (2004): When molecules and morphology clash: recon- SEO, H.-C., EDVARDSEN, R. B., MAELAND, A.D., BJORDAL, M., ciling conflicting phylogenies of the Metazoa by considering sec- JENSEN, M. F., HANSEN, A., FLAAT, M., WEISSENBACH, J., ondary character loss. Evolution and Development 6: 372-378. LEHRACH, H., WINCKER, P., REINHARDT, R. & CHOURROUT, D. JIMÉNEZ-GURI, E., PAPS, J., GARCÍA-FERNÀNDEZ & SALÓ, E. (2006): (2004): Hox cluster disintegration with persistent anteroposterior Hox and ParaHox genes in , a basal bilaterian order of expression in Oikopleura dioica. Nature 431: 67-71. clade. International Journal of Developmental Biology 50: 675- SHU, D. G., LUO, H. L., MORRIS, S. C., ZHANG, X. L., HU, S. X., 679. CHEN, L., HAN, J., ZHU, M., LI, Y. & CHEN, L. Z. (1999): Lower LACALLI, T.C. (2005): Protochordate body plan and the evolutionary Cambrian vertebrates from south China. Nature 402: 42-46. role of larvae: old controversies resolved? Canadian Journal of SHU, D. G., CONWAY MORRIS, S., HAN, J., CHEN, L., ZHANG, X. L., Zoology 83: 216-224. LIU, H. Q., LI, Y. & LIU, Y. N. (2001): Primitive deuterostomes LEROI, A.M. (2000): The scale independence of evolution. Evolution from the Chengjiang Lagerstätte (lower cambrian, China). Nature and development 2: 67-77. 414: 419-424. LOWE, C. J. (2008): Molecular genetic insights into deuterostome evo- SHU, D., MORRIS, S. C., ZHANG, Z. F., LIU, J. N., HAN, J., CHEN, L., lution from the direct developing hemichordate Saccoglossus kow- ZHANG, X. L., YASUI, K. & LI, Y. (2003): A new species of yunna- alevskii. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 363: 1569-1578. nozoan with implications for deuterostome evolution. Science 299: MALLATT, J. & CHEN, J. Y. (2003): Fossil sister group of : 1380-1384. predicted and found. Journal of Morphology 258: 1-31. STACH, T., DUPONT, S., ISRAELSSON, O., FAUVILLE, G., NAKANO, H., MALLATT, J. & WINCHELL, C. J. (2007): Ribosomal RNA genes and KÄNNEBY, T. & THORNDYKE, M. (2005): Nerve cells of Xenotur- deuterostome phylogeny revisited: More cyclostomes, elasmo- bella bocki (phylum uncertain) and Harrimania kupfferi (Enterop- branches, , and a . Molecular Phylogenetics and neusta) are positively immunoreactive to antibodies raised against Evolution 43: 1005-1022. echinoderm neuropeptides. Journal of the Marine Biology Associa- MARLÉTAZ, F., MARTIN, E., PEREZ, Y., PAPILLON, D., CAUBIT, X., tion of the United Kingdom 85: 1519-1524. LOWE, C.J., FREEMAN, B., FASANO, L., DOSSAT, C., WINCKER, P., SWALLA, B. J. & SMITH, A. B. (2008): Decipherinmg deuterostome WEISSENBACH, J. & LE PARCO, Y. (2006): Chaetognath phyloge- phylogeny: molecular, morphological and palaeontological per- nomics: a protostome with deuterostome-like development. Current spectives. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 363: 1557-1568. Biology 16: R577-R578. SYED, T. (2003): Wie neu ist die "New Animal Phylogeny"? Eine METSCHNIKOFF, V. E. (1881): Über die systematische Stellung von mögliche Synthese morphologischer und molekularer Befunde zur . Zoologischer Anzeiger 4: 139-157. Bauplan-Evolution. Jahrbuch für Geschichte und Theorie der Biol- NIELSEN, C. (2001): Animal Evolution. Interrelationships of the living ogie 9: 33-76. phyla. Oxford University press. SYED, T., GUDO, M. & GUTMANN, M. (2007): Die neue Großphyloge- NÜBLER-JUNG, K. & ARENDT, D. (1999): Dorsoventral axis inversion: nie des Tierreiches: Dilemma oder Fortschritt? Denisia 20: 295- Enteropneust links invertebrates to chordates turned 312. upside down. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary VARGAS, A.O. & ABOITIZ, F. (2005): How ancient is the adult swim- Research 37: 93-100. ming capacity in the lineage leading to euchordates? Evolution and PERSEKE, M., HANKELN, T., WEICH, B., FRITZSCH, G., STADLER, P. F., Development 7: 171-174. ISRAELSSON, O., BERNHARD, D. & SCHLEGEL, M. (2007): The WADA, H., OKUYAMA, M. SATOH, N. & ZHANG, S. (2006): Molecular mitochondrial DNA of Xenoturbella bocki: genomic architecture evolution of fibrillar collagen in chordates, with implications for and phylogenetic analysis. Theory in Biosciences 126: 35-42. the evolution of vertebrate skeletons and chordate phylogeny. Evo- PHILIPPE, H., LARTILLOT, N. & BRINKMANN, H. (2005): Multigene lution and Development 8: 370-377. analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of Ecdys- WINCHELL, C. J., SULLIVAN, J., CAMERON, C. B., SWALLA, B. J. & ozoa, Lophotrochozoa and Protostomia. Molecular Biology and MALLATT, J. (2002): Evaluating hypotheses of deuterostome phy- Evolution 22: 1246-1253. logeny and chordate evolution with new LSU and SSU ribosomal DNA data. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 762-776.