Agrihoods: Development-Supported Agriculture

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Agrihoods: Development-Supported Agriculture !"#$%&$'("%)"*+,"-'*.%/'0"1,/*,$")%$"!##$%#$.'*,"2,3+/%0%&4""5""678997:;<7=6;9""5"">>>?'**$'?/3'*?%$& Agrihoods: Development-Supported Agriculture By Jef Birkby This publication introduces the concept of development-supported agriculture, also known as agrihoods. NCAT Smart Growth The recent growth of agrihoods in the United States is discussed. The major types of agrihoods are Specialist described, and the benef ts and challenges of agrihood development are discussed. Case studies of Published June 2016 agrihoods are presented, and further agrihood resources are included. ©NCAT IP515 Contents Introduction: What are Agrihoods? .................1 Types of Agrihoods ..........................2 Inf ll Development and Agrihoods ..................3 Benef ts of Agrihoods ..........................3 Challenges and Concerns of Agrihoods ..........................5 Conclusion .........................6 Appendix: 12 Agrihoods Taking Farm-to-Table Living Mainstream ..........7 References .........................9 Farmers Market at Willowsford Farms. Photo Credit: Molly Peterson Further Resources ...........9 Introduction—What are Agrihoods? he popularity of planned suburban Although this type of mass-produced subdivision home developments in the United States has been popular for decades, residents of these stretches back to the 1950s. Many sol- cookie-cutter housing developments often felt iso- Tdiers returning from World War II were anxious lated from their neighbors due to the subdivision ATTRA (www.attra.ncat.org) to acquire a home and start a family, and the GI design and lack of central gathering places and is a program of the National bill provided low-interest loans that helped kick- Center for Appropriate Technology walkable streets. But in the 21st century, many start the postwar housing boom. Many post-war (NCAT). The program is funded millennials, baby boomers, and retirees are seek- through a cooperative agreement subdivisions consisted of identical home designs with the United States Department ing out neighborhoods that have more direct packed within cul-de-sacs and along broad streets, of Agriculture’s Rural Business- relationship to the land and to local food. An Cooperative Service. Visit the often located far from a city center. Levittown, NCAT website (www.ncat.org) built between 1947 and 1951 in the state of New increasingly popular subdivision design, called an for more information on York, epitomized this type of subdivision. More agrihood, is helping to f ll this desire to connect our other sustainable agriculture and than 17,000 homes f lled the Levittown subdivi- more closely with their community, with nature, energy projects. sion by the early 1950s. and with their food supply. www.attra.ncat.org Page 1 (Serenbe, just outside Atlanta, was established in 2005; and Prairie Crossing, outside Chicago, was developed in 1995). But the real growth in agri- hoods has occurred in the past decade. Interest and growth in agrihood developments has been dramatic. Ed McMahon of the Urban Land Insti- tute estimates that, as of 2014, there are over 200 agrihoods either developed or in the planning stages in the United States (McColl, 2015). Types of Agrihoods Agrihoods typically feature a central working farm, which can include livestock, orchards, vineyards, and row crops. Agrihoods can vary Levittown subdivision in the 1950s. Photo: Courtesy of dramatically in total acreage, number of home Wiki Commons sites, and farm size. Unlike the thousands of golf-course developments T e smallest agrihoods are sometimes called Related ATTRA microhoods, which consist of less than a dozen in the nation, where homes are built around a Publications homes that surround a large community garden central golf course and club house, an agrihood www.attra.ncat.org or small farm. T e residents of these small agri- is built around a working farm, with much of the hoods may be much more active in farm man- Community Orchards land preserved for growing food or set aside in agement than larger agrihoods, with residents Community conservation easements. choosing what crops to plant and how to market Supported Agriculture the produce. Community T e most common agrihoods in the United States Gardening range in size from 100 to 1,000 home units, with Start a Farm in the City a signif cant portion of land set aside for the work- ing farm and protected areas. In many cases, these Tips for Selling through CSAs— agrihoods are built around farms that have been Community in the same family for generations, and the farm Supported Agriculture family is behind the development. At the largest end of the agrihood spectrum are new development-supported agriculture projects that may contain several thousand homes and have hundreds of acres set aside for farming or Golf course subdivisions, popular in the 1960s, land conservation. A large agrihood currently were built around a clubhouse and golf ng greens. under construction near Orlando, Florida, called Photo: Courtesy of Wiki Commons Lake Pickett South, will contain almost 3,000 homes. T is agrihood, which will cost about $1 In some agrihoods, the homeowners surround- billion to complete, will feature a 9-acre farm, ing the working farm own shares in the farm, almost 20 acres of community gardens, and a and can choose to be actively involved in the farm-to-table restaurant. T e developer estimates planting and harvesting of crops if they desire. it will take about 20 years to fully build out the agrihood. T e agrihood residents may also hire a farm manager to live onsite and manage the day-to- Agrihood developers also target dif erent income day operation. and age clientele in their home developments and locations. In some cases, high-end homes are More of cially called development-supported the norm, with million-dollar homes common, agriculture, the agrihood concept is fairly new to such as the Kukui’ula agrihood development in suburban developers. A few community-owned Hawaii. On the other end of the spectrum, some farmsteads were built in the past 20 years or so agrihoods target low-income and senior citizens, Page 2 Agrihoods: Development-Supported Agriculture as well as mixed-generation developments. T e Win6 development near Santa Clara California is an example of an agrihood that consciously targets a percentage of its homes for low-income and senior citizen residents. Inf ill Development and Agrihoods Inf ll development (using previously developed commercial land within an urban boundary) is often preferred over developing open space or agricultural land. But many of the agrihoods in the United States are based around existing rural farms on the outskirts of urban areas. However, some developers and city planners are viewing agrihoods as an option for inf ll development, using land available near aban- doned malls, shuttered factories, and demolished housing projects. The Win6 agrihood in downtown Santa Clara, California, will feature low-income housing. Source: Davis Studio Architecture + Design, http://davisstudioad.com Two examples of inf ll agrihoods are described below. Inf ill Example 2: Win6 Village Inf ill Example 1: The Cannery Santa Clara, California, is the site of a new 6-acre One of the f rst agrihoods to make use an aban- inf ll agrihood near a busy thoroughfare. Located doned commercial facility is the Cannery, located near two large shopping centers, the Win6 proj- near Davis, California. Concrete covering the site ect will feature a small organic farm, as well as of the abandoned Hunt-Wesson tomato-process- community and children’s gardens. Other fea- ing facility was removed, and the soil underneath tures include more than 150 housing units desig- was used to create a new farm-centered subdivi- nated for low-income or senior housing. Walkable sion. (Hickman, 2015) design will be incorporated, allowing residents to easily travel to nearby malls for shopping. Con- Opened in late 2015, the 100-acre development struction on the Win6 development is scheduled will eventually feature over 500 new homes sur- to start in January 2017 (Herron, 2015). rounding a 7.4-acre working farm. Almost f ve acres of public parks and other open space will Benef its of Agrihoods give community residents room for recreation. T e Cannery’s working farm will be managed by T e rise of agrihoods in the United States is linked the nonprof t Center for Land-Based Learning, to a variety of benef ts available to developers, which will also manage an educational facility farmers, and residents. Many of these benef ts are for beginning farmers. tangible, but some are psychological. Sustainable design will be used in all residential Perhaps the greatest attraction for land developers considering agrihoods are much lower develop- homes built in the Cannery, including solar pho- ment costs compared to similar amenity-centered tovoltaic systems on the rooftops, tankless water subdivisions. Over 16,000 golf communities have heaters, energy-ef cient design, and aging-in- been built in the nation since the 1960s. T ese place features for senior citizens. Home buyers communities usually provided developers with a can also choose to increase the energy features nice prof t premium when compared to standard in the homes to achieve a net-zero-energy status, subdivisions without the golf-course amenity. requiring no net energy to heat, cool, and light the home. A commerce district and town center is It’s easy to see why many developers have changed planned for retail and small business of ce space their mindset from a golf-course centered devel- (McGrath, 2015). opment to agrihoods, centered on a working farm. www.attra.ncat.org Page 3 “[Developers] f gured out they could charge a lot have been built on inf ll space or rehabilitated premium [of] anywhere from 15 to 25 percent, industrial brownf elds, and a variety of tax cred- [for golf-centered subdivisions],” says Ed McMa- its and other f nancial incentives are available to hon of the Urban Land Institute.
Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents
    City of Encinitas DRAFT SIXTH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT APPENDIX B Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................... i Appendix B: Housing Profile Report ...................................................................................... 1 1 Population Characteristics ............................................................................................... 1 1.1 Population Growth ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Age Characteristics ...................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Race/Ethnicity Characteristics ..................................................................................... 2 1.4 Employment ................................................................................................................. 4 1.5 Commuting Patterns .................................................................................................... 6 2 Household Characteristics ............................................................................................... 7 2.1 Household Type and Size ............................................................................................ 8 2.2 Household Income ......................................................................................................10 3 Housing Problems ...........................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 RESEARCH REPORT Build Well to Live Well WELLNESS LIFESTYLE REAL ESTATE and COMMUNITIES
    2018 RESEARCH REPORT Build Well to Live Well WELLNESS LIFESTYLE REAL ESTATE AND COMMUNITIES WWW.GLOBALWELLNESSINSTITUTE.ORG Build Well to Live Well Wellness Lifestyle Real Estate and Communities JANUARY 2018 Copyright © 2017-2018 by the Global Wellness Institute Quotation of, citation from, and reference to any of the data, findings, and research methodology from this report must be credited to “Global Wellness Institute, Build Well to Live Well: Wellness Lifestyle Real Estate and Communities, January 2018.” For more information, please contact [email protected] or visit www.globalwellnessinstitute.org. CONTENTS Executive Summary iii I. Wellness Lifestyle Real Estate and 1 Communities: Why Now? II. What Is Unwell in the Places We Call Home? 5 III. From Wellness Lifestyle Real Estate to 19 Wellness Community IV. The Business Case 29 V. The Wellness Case 53 VI. Regional Trends & Pipeline Lists 65 Appendix A: Detailed examples of infrastructure, design elements, and 93 amenities in wellness lifestyle real estate and communities Appendix B: Wellness-related rating/certification systems and design 99 principles Appendix C: Methodology for home sales price premium estimates 103 Appendix D: Detailed examples of operational and financial models for 107 community wellness facilities and services Appendix E: Impact studies and reports by wellness real estate 113 developers and operators Appendix F: Resources for measuring wellness impacts 117 Bibliography and Resource Guide 123 Acknowledgements 139 Photo Credits 143 Industry Research Sponsors 145 ABOUT ABOUT THE GLOBAL WELLNESS INSTITUTE The Global Wellness Institute (GWI), a non-profit 501(c)(3), is considered the leading global research and educational resource for the global wellness economy and is known for introducing major industry initiatives and regional events that bring together leaders and visionaries to chart the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultivating Development: Trends and Opportunities at the Intersection of Food and Real Estate
    CULTIVATING DEVELOPMENT Trends and Opportunities at the Intersection of Food and Real Estate Building Healthy Places Initiative On the cover: Investments in food-related enterprises within the context of real estate projects can support a developer’s bottom line, while also advancing health and sustainability goals. (© SeanShot/iStock) © 2016 by the Urban Land Institute 2001 L Street, NW Suite 200 Washington, DC 20036 Printed in the United States of America. All rights reserved. Reproduction or use of the whole or any part of the contents without written permission of the copyright holder is prohibited Recommended bibliographic listing: Urban Land Institute. Cultivating Development: Trends and Opportunities at the Intersection of Food and Real Estate. Washington, D.C.: Urban Land Institute, 2016. ISBN: 978-0-87420-394-3 CULTIVATING DEVELOPMENT Trends and Opportunities at the Intersection of Food and Real Estate Building Healthy Places Initiative ABOUT THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE The Urban Land Institute is a nonprofit research and education organization whose mission is to provide leadership in the responsible use of land and in creating and sustaining thriving communities worldwide. Established in 1936, the Institute today has more than 39,000 members and associates from 82 countries, representing the entire spectrum of the land use and development disciplines. ULI relies heavily on the experience of its members. It is through member involvement and information resources that ULI has been able to set standards of excellence in development practice. The Institute is recognized internationally as one of America’s most respected and widely quoted sources of objective information on urban planning, growth, and development.
    [Show full text]
  • FUTURE ENERGY EFFICIENT BUILDINGS: Visions and Challenges
    FUTURE ENERGY EFFICIENT BUILDINGS: Visions and Challenges PETER BUSBY C.M., AIA, FRAIC, MAIBC, MAAA, MOAA, BCID, LEED AP, DSc (Hon.) Managing Director, Perkins+Will San Francisco We are at a Tipping Point Comparative Energy Consumption 100% 100% 80% Building 60% 61% 50% 48% 1999 47% - 40% 42% 42% 40% 40% 38% 20% 25% ASHRAE 90.1 15% 0% -5% -5% -10% -15% -20% CIRS Van Dusen Telus Office BP+W Office BP+W Mount Pleasant Norman Maurice Dockside Balance Dockside Dockside Synergy Dockside Vento Residential -40% ASHRAE Prototype York Computer Science White Rock Operations Centre for Interactive Research on Sustainability (CIRS) 2030 Challenge Target for 2008 (50%) Labs 21 CUI:75.4 kg/m²/yr Zero Modeled CUI: 0 kg/m²/yr CIRS • 100% Daylit • Naturally ventilated • Under individual control • Healthy materials • Flexible skin • Reconfigurable • Beyond LEED Platinum • Meeting Living Building Challenge • Net zero energy • Carbon negative operation • Net zero water use • Net gain in landscaped areas Floor Plans • Organized into two wings linked by atrium • Houses 200 researchers who work collaboratively toward a common mission: to accelerate sustainability Social Space • Four-storey atrium serves as: • Building lobby • Entry to daylit 500-seat auditorium • 'Social condenser' space that builds academic community Daylighting Solar Energy Ventilation System Energy Exchange System Rainwater to Potable Water System Structural Systems Stormwater Reclaimed Water Landscape CIRS Systems Approach Carbon Neutral Construction Concrete Glass Aluminum Brick Tonnes
    [Show full text]
  • Working BB.Indd
    Builders Bulletin * Bid Date Bid Time Location Project Name Bidding This Week... JULY 27, 2020 3:00 PM 7/27/20 San Luis Obispo 2019-20 Asphalt Overlay Various North County Roads 10:00 AM Santa Cruz Rfq - Usgs Pacific Coastal & Marine Electrical Outlet Installation 7/27/20 2:30 PM 7/28/20 Cayucos Cayucos Fire Station Replacement: Material Testing/Inspection Services 7/28/20 2:00 PM Cayucos Cayucos Fs Replacement: Inspector Of Record (Ior) Services 7/28/20 3:00 PM Palo Alto Rfq On-Call Crane Services - City Of Palo Alto 7/28/20 2:00 PM Santa Cruz Walnut Avenue Sewer Replacement 7/28/20 2:00 PM Aptos Cathedral Drive Pm 1.21 2017 Storm Damage Repair 7/28/20 2:00 PM Soquel Soquel San Jose Rd Pms 3.97 & 5.67 Storm Damage Repair 7/28/20 2:00 PM Monterey Citywide Sidewalk Repair Phase 5 * 7/28/20 2:00 PM Hollister Measure G Road Maintenance Project At Southside Road 5000 Block, Fy 19-20 * 7/28/20 2:00 PM Marina Stockade Complex Hazardous Material Abatement And Building Removal 2:00 PM 7/28/20 Monterey City Elevator, Escalator, Wheelchair Lift, And Dumbwaiter Maintenance Services 2:00 PM Monterey Citywide Curb Ramp, Phase 3 7/28/20 2:00 PM 7/28/20 Santa Cruz Rfp - Electrical Power System Reconfiguration At The Wastewater Treatment Facility 10:00 AM San Jose Insomnia Cookies (Request For Sub Bids) 7/28/20 2:00 PM 7/29/20 San Jose San Jose City College (Sjcc) Theater Improvements Av/Lighting Upgrades 2:00 PM Los Osos South Bay Well Site Water Transmission Main To Main Zone 7/29/20 2:00 PM Santa Cruz Branciforte Drive Storm Damage Repair 7/29/20
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide for Governments on Building Local Food Economies
    A Guide for Governments on Building Local Food Economies A guide for planners, economic developers, and local government professionals Published by the Center for Environmental Farming Systems, 2016. The Center for Environmental Farming Systems is a partnership of North Carolina State University (NC State), North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (N.C. A&T), and the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDA&CS). Sustainable Farms. Local Foods. Healthy Communities. www.cefs.ncsu.edu | www.localfoodeconomies.org A Guide for Governments on Building Local Food Economies Food Local Building on Governments for A Guide 2 A Guide for Governments on Building Local Food Economies A guide for planners, economic developers, and local government professionals Authors: Emily Edmonds, Center for Environmental Farming Systems Rebecca Dunning, Center for Environmental Farming Systems Contributors: ABOUT THE CENTER FOR Taylor Smith, UNC-Chapel Hill, City & Regional Planning Reviewers: ENVIRONMENTAL Donald Belk, AICP, N-Focus Planning FARMING SYSTEMS Erin White, Community Food Lab Debbie Hamrick, North Carolina Farm Bureau Jonathan Morgan, UNC-Chapel Hill School of Government CEFS is one of the Notes on the previous publication: nation’s most important Portions of this publication were published in the 2013 Center for centers for research, Environmental Farming Systems publication, “A Community & Local extension, and Government Guide to Developing Local Food Systems.” Content has been updated to reflect current legislation, and additional content education in sustainable has been added. The 2013 version is available at agriculture and https://cefs.ncsu.edu/resources/a-community-and-local-government-guide- to-developing-local-food-systems-in-north-carolina-2013/.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Partnerships Growing a Stronger Economy
    Agenda Item No: 15.A STAFF REPORT Report To: Board of Supervisors Meeting Date: April 18, 2019 Staff Contact: Nancy Paulson, City Manager Agenda Title: For Discussion Only: Presentation and discussion regarding the Western Nevada Development District (WNDD), including an overview of WNDD, its mission and future activities. (Nancy Paulson, [email protected]) Staff Summary: Ed Lawson, WNDD Board President and Sheryl Gonzales, WNDD Executive Director, will provide an overview of the Western Nevada Development District. Agenda Action: Other / Presentation Time Requested: 15 mins Proposed Motion No action - presentation only Board's Strategic Goal Economic Development Previous Action N/A Background/Issues & Analysis N/A Applicable Statute, Code, Policy, Rule or Regulation N/A Financial Information Is there a fiscal impact? No If yes, account name/number: Is it currently budgeted? Explanation of Fiscal Impact: Alternatives Attachments: WNDD 2019 - CARSON CITY - 41819[2].pptx 1 Board Action Taken: Motion: _________________ 1) ________________ Aye/Nay 2) ________________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________________________________ (Vote Recorded By) 2 WESTERN NEVADA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT REGIONAL PARTNERSHIPS GROWING A STRONGER ECONOMY Sheryl Gonzales, WNDD Executive Director 3 WNDD - 2019 WESTERN NEVADAModern DEVELOPMENT Presentation DISTRICT Established in 1983 as the only Nevada Certified U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA) Development District. Founders included: Carson City, Douglas, Lyon and Storey Counties A multi-jurisdictional entity comprised of nine counties and five cities – 4 Associate Members. Funding provided through an annual EDA planning grant and membership dues. Board comprised of elected and appointed officials, staff and businesses identified by the member counties and cities. Associate members participate with the WNDD Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Reports and Meeting Minutes
    REGULAR MEETING AGENDA January 21, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. Pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order, Commissioners of the California Statewide Communities Development Authority or staff may participate in this meeting via a teleconference. In the interest of maintaining appropriate social distancing, members of the public may participate in the meeting telephonically. Members of the public may observe and offer comment at this meeting telephonically by dialing 623-404-9000, Meeting ID 240 338 9861 Passcode 747188. If you are an individual with a disability and need a reasonable modification or accommodation pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) please contact [email protected] or 1-800-531-7476 prior to the meeting for assistance. A. OPENING AND PROCEDURAL ITEMS 1. Roll Call. ____ Kevin O’Rourke, Chair ____ Brian Stiger, Member ____ Tim Snellings, Vice Chair ____ Marcia Raines, Member ____ Brian Moura, Secretary ____ Niroop Srivatsa, Alt. Member ____ Jordan Kaufman, Treasurer ____ Dan Mierzwa, Member 2. Consideration of the Minutes of the January 7, 2021 Annual Meeting. 3. Consent Calendar. 4. Public Comment. B. ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION AND ACTION 5. Consideration of the issuance of revenue bonds or other obligations to finance or refinance the following projects, the execution and delivery of related documents, and other related actions: a. Bayshore Affordable, LP (Gateway at Millbrae Apartments), City of Millbrae, County of San Mateo; issue up to $40,000,000 in multi-family housing revenue bonds. b. Winchester Sustainable, LP (Agrihood Senior Apartments), City of Santa Clara, County of Santa Clara; issue up to $60,000,000 in multi-family housing revenue bonds.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICE: Agenda Is Subject to Change up to 24 Hours Before Scheduled Meeting
    AGENDA HAYDEN PLANNING COMMISSION THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2020 7:00 P.M. HAYDEN TOWN HALL – 178 WEST JEFFERSON AVENUE, HAYDEN LIVE ATTENDANCE LIMITED PER STATE OF COLORADO COVID-19 PUBLIC HEALTH ORDERS AND MASKS ARE REQUIRED PER ROUTT COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH ORDER #3 ATTENDEES/PLANNING COMMISSIONERS MAY PARTICIPATE VIRTUALLY VIA ZOOM WITH THE INFORMATION BELOW: Join Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82998389167?pwd=TVJzOUZCSDEwWVZBZXk3a3RlVGVjUT09 Meeting ID: 829 9838 9167 Passcode: 930348 One tap mobile +16699009128,,82998389167#,,,,,,0#,,930348# US (San Jose) +12532158782,,82998389167#,,,,,,0#,,930348# US (Tacoma) THE TOWN WILL ALSO BROADCAST THIS MEETING ON FACEBOOK LIVE AT THE TOWN’S FACEBOOK PAGE AT https://www.facebook.com/coloradohayden/ *OFFICIAL RECORDINGS AND RECORDS OF MEETINGS WILL BE THE ZOOM RECORDING AND NOT FACEBOOK LIVE. FACEBOOK LIVE IS MERELY A TOOL TO INCREASE COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT AND IS NOT THE OFFICIAL RECORD.* REGULAR MEETING 1. CALL TO ORDER, MOMENT OF SILENCE & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES a. Review and Consider Approval of October 8, 2020 Minutes 4. WORK SESSION – HAYDEN MASTER PLAN a. Work Session for a presentation, review and discussion on the Hayden Master Plan 5. ADJOURNMENT NOTICE: Agenda is subject to change up to 24 hours before scheduled meeting. If you require special assistance in order to attend any of the Town’s public meetings or events, please notify the Town of Hayden at (970) 276-3741 at least 48 hours in advance of the scheduled event so the necessary arrangements can be made. Regular Meeting Hayden Planning Commission October 8, 2020 The regular meeting of the Hayden Planning Commission was called to order by Chair Amy Williams at 7:02 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Working BB.Indd
    Builders Bulletin BiddingBid Date Bid Time Location This Week...Project Name JULY 20, 2020 7/20/20 5:00 PM Monterey Presidio Of Monterey Buildings 220 And 233 7/20/20 3:00 PM Santa Clara County As Needed Glass And Door Repair - County Of Santa Clara 7/20/20 2:00 PM Atascadero Grease Trap Pumping Services * 7/20/20 11:00 AM Hollister Hollister Dollar General - Store #21261 (Sub Bids Only) 2:00 PM 7/21/20 San Luis Obispo Cal Poly - Building 19/19a Design Assist And Design Build (Sub Bids Only) 2:00 PM 7/21/20 Saratoga Saratoga High School Wing 900 Classroom Modernization - Los Gatos Saratoga Union High School District 10:00 AM Paso Robles Cuesta College North County Campus - Sitework Improvements 7/21/20 4:00 PM Los Altos Adobe Creek Sewer Main Replacement - City Of Los Altos 7/21/20 10:00 AM 7/21/20 Hollister Enterprise Road Maintenance Project At Best Road And Fairview Road, Fy 19-20 2:00 PM 7/21/20 Marina Stockade Complex Hazardous Material Abatement And Building Removal * 7/21/20 4:00 PM Hollister Rfsoq - San Benito County Campus Phase 1 7/22/20 3:00 PM Hollister Meditation Garden Renovation * 7/23/20 2:00 PM San Jose Roofing Replacements (4011c) - Sjusd * 7/23/20 2:00 PM King City King City High School Cafeteria Roof Repair * 7/23/20 1:00 PM San Jose Roofing Replacements (4002c) - Sjusd 11:00 AM 7/23/20 Cupertino Deer Hollow Farm White Barn Structural Stabilization Rancho San Antonio Open Space Preserve - Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 7/23/20 2:00 PM Monte Sereno 2020 Annual Pavement Improvement - City Of Monte Sereno 7/23/20
    [Show full text]
  • Brookings County Planning & Zoning Commission
    BROOKINGS COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF JULY 6, 2021 REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING MEETING The Brookings County Planning & Zoning Commission met at their regular meeting on Tuesday, July 6, 2021. Those in attendance were in person or via phone. The following members were present: Chad Ford, Mike Bartley, Brian Gatzke, Spencar Diedrich, Darrel Kleinjan, Kyle Vanderwal, Randy Jensen, and alternate and Dale Storhaug. Phoned in: Michael McHugh. Absent were: Neil Trooien and alternate Roger Erickson. Also present were: Deputy Director Richard Haugen and County Development Director/Emergency Manager Robert Hill. CALL TO ORDER Chair Ford called the meeting to order at 8:02 PM APPROVAL OF MINUTES (Vanderwal/Diedrich) Motion to approve the June 1, 2021 Meeting Minutes. Roll call vote: Bartley-aye, McHugh-aye, Gatzke-aye, Diedrich-aye, Kleinjan-aye, Vanderwal-aye, Jensen-aye, Storhaug-aye, Ford-aye. 9-aye, 0-nay. MOTION CARRIED. ITEMS TO BE ADDED TO AGENDA BY COMMISSION MEMBERS OR STAFF. None added. INVITATION FOR CITIZENS TO SCHEDULE TIME ON AGENDA FOR ITEM NOT LISTED. Time limited to 5 minutes per person to address the board. No one scheduled time to address the board. DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST None. APPROVAL OF AGENDA (Vanderwal/Kleinjan) Motion to approve the agenda for the July 6, 2021 Meeting. Roll call vote: McHugh-aye, Gatzke-aye, Diedrich-aye, Kleinjan-aye, Vanderwal-aye, Jensen- aye, Storhaug-aye, Ford-aye, Bartley-aye. 9-aye, 0-nay. MOTION CARRIED. CONVENE AS BROOKINGS COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION OF PLATS 2021PLAT008 For property described as “Plat of Block 1 of Seppanen Addition located in the S1/2 of the NW1/4 and N1/2 of the SW1/4 of Section 10, T112N, R50W of the 5 P.M., Brookings County, South Dakota.” Submitted by David Seppanen to combine two parcels of land they own.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Clara Agrihood Traffic Operations Analysis
    Santa Clara Agrihood Traffic Operations Analysis Prepared for: David J. Powers & Associates, Inc. March 29, 2018 Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Hexagon Office: 4 North Second Street, Suite 400 San Jose, CA 95113 Hexagon Job Number: 15GB42 Phone: 408.971.6100 Client Name: David J. Powers & Associates, Inc. Santa Clara Agrihood – Traffic Operations Analysis March 29, 2018 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... i 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................................... 9 3. Background Conditions .................................................................................................................. 16 4. Existing Plus Project Conditions .................................................................................................... 19 5. Background Plus Project Conditions .............................................................................................. 26 6. Other Transportation Issues .......................................................................................................... 32 7. Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]